1. Farmers’ valuation of transgenic biofortified sorghum for nutritional improvement in Burkina Faso: A latent class approach. (2018). Speelman, Stijn ; Chinedu, Obi ; Tur-Cardona, Juan ; Gheysen, Godelieve ; Bartolini, Fabio ; Sanou, Edouard.
   In: Food Policy.
   RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:79:y:2018:i:c:p:132-140.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. Eco-certified contract choice among coffee farmersin Brazil. (2016). Lifran, Robert ; Jaeck, Melanie.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:lam:wpaper:09-16.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Use of Contingent Valuation to Assess Farmer Preference for On-farm Conservation of Minor Millets: Case from South India. (2012). Raghu, Prabhakaran ; Das, Sukanya ; Ravi, S. B. ; King, E. D. I. O, .
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:43348.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Use of Contingent Valuation to Assess Farmer Preference for On-farm Conservation of Minor Millets: Case from South India. (2012). Raghu, Prabhakaran ; Das, Sukanya ; Israel, E D ; Ravi, Bala S.
   In: Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics.
   RePEc:ags:inijae:204813.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. The Value of Improved Public Services : An Application of the Choice Experiment Method to Estimate the Value of Improved Wastewater Treatment Infrastructure in India. (2010). Das, Sukanya ; Birol, Ekin.
   In: Development Economics Working Papers.
   RePEc:eab:develo:23062.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

1. Adamowicz, W.L., J. Louviere and M. Williams. 1994. Combining stated and revealed preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 271-292.

2. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 121 (3): 211-221 Canales, Al. 2003. Mexican labor migration to the United States in the age of globalization. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 29(4): 741-761.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
3. Andrews, R.L., and IS. Currim. 2003. A comparison of segment retention criteria for finite mixture logit models. Journal of MarketingResearch 40(2): 235-243.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   
4. Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B., Hanemann, W.M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Ozdemiroglu, E., Pearce, D.W., Sugden, R. and S. Swanson. 2003. Guidelines for the use of stated preference techniques for the valuation ofpreferences for non-market goods. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

5. Bellon, M.R. 2004. Conceptualizing interventions to support on-farm genetic resource conservation. World Development 32 (1):159-172.

6. Bellon, M.R. and J. Berthaud. 2004. Transgenic maize and the evolution of landrace diversity in Mexico. The importance of farmers. Plant Physiology 134: 883-888.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

7. Bennett, J.J. and R.K. Blamey. 2001. The choice of modelling approach to environmental valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

8. Birol, E., A. Kontoleon and M. Smale. 2006b. Farmer demand for agricultural biodiversity in Hungarys transition economy: A choice experiment approach. In Valuing crop biodiversity on farms during economic change, ed. Smale, M. Wallingford: CAB International.
   Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
   

9. Boxall, P.C. and W.L. Adamowicz. 2002. Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach. Environmental andResource Economics 23: 421-446.

10. Brookfield, H. and M. Stocking. 1999. Agrodiversity: Definition, description and design, Global Environmental Change 9: 77-80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
11. Brush, SB. and H.R. Perales. 2007. A maize landscape: Ethnicity and agro-biodiversity in Chiapas Mexico.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

12. Dalton, R. 2001. Transgenic corn found growing in Mexico. Nature 412: 337.

13. Dyer, G. and A. Yunez-Naude. 2003. NAFTA and conservation of maize diversity in Mexico, paper prepared for the second North American symposium on assessing the environmental effects of trade, commission for environmental cooperation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
14. Fowler, C. and T. Hodgkin. 2004. Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture: Assessing global availability. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 29 (10): 1-37.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
15. Freeman, A.M. 2002. The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods. Second Edition. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
16. Greene, W.H. 1997. Econometric analysis. Third Edition. New York: Prentice Hall.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

17. Hanley, N., RE. Wright and W.L. Adamowicz. 1998. Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and Resources Economics 11(3-4): 4 13-428.

18. Harlan, JR. 1992. Crops and man. Madison, WI, American Soc. Agronomy.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

19. Hu, W., HUnnemeyer, A., Veeman, M., Adamowicz, W.L. and L. Srivastava. 2004. Trading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in food. European Review ofAgricultural Economics 31: 3 89-408.

20. Kloppenburg, JR. Ed. 1988. Seeds and sovereignty: The use and control of plant genetic resources. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
21. Kontoleon, A. 2003. Essays on non-market valuation of environmental resources: policy and technical explorations, Ph.D. Thesis, University College London, University of London.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

22. Kontoleon, A. and M. Yabe. 2006. Market segmentation analysis of preferences for GM derived animal foods in the UK, Journal ofAgricultural & Food Industrial Organization 4(1): Article 8. Accessed online, July 2007 at http ://www.bepress.comlj afio/vol4/iss 1/art8 Lancaster, K. 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 74:132-157.

23. Louviere, J.J., D.A. Hensher, J.D. Swait and W.L. Adamowicz. 2000. Stated choice methods: Analysis and applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

24. Luce, D. 1959. Individual choice behaviour. New York: John Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
25. McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In Frontiers in econometrics, ed. Zarembka, P. New York: Academic Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

26. Ndjeunga, J. and C. H. Nelson. 2005. Toward understanding household preference for consumption characteristics of millet varieties: a case study from western Niger, Agricultural Economics 32(2): 151-165.

27. Othman, J., Bennett, J. and R. Blamey. 2004. Environmental values and resource management options: A choice modelling experience in Malaysia. Environment and Development Economics 9: 803-824 Owen, K., Louviere, J. and J. Clark. 2005. Impact of genetic engineering on consumer demand. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Accessed online, July 2007 at http ://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/GLC/05-0 15 .pdf.

28. Roseland, CR. 2002. LMOS and the environment: Proceedings of an International Conference Paris: Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
29. Ruto, E. 2005. Valuing Animal Genetic Resources: A Choice Modelling Application to Indigenous Cattle in Kenya, Paper presented at the Seventh Annual BIOECON Conference Economics and the Analysis of Biology and Biodiversity, September 20-2 1, 2005, Kings College Cambridge Scarpa, R., A. Drucker, S. Anderson, N. Ferraes-Ehuan, V. Gomez, C. R. Risopatron and 0. Rubio-Leonel. 2003a. Valuing animal genetic resources in peasant economies: The case of the Box Keken Creole Pig in Yucatan. Ecological Economics 45(3): 427-443.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

30. Scarpa R., E.S.K. Ruto, P. Kristjanson, M. Radeny, AG. Drucker and J.E.O. Rege. 2003b. Valuing indigenous cattle breeds in Kenya: An empirical comparison of stated and revealed preference value estimates. Ecological Economics 45(3): 409-426.

31. Smale, M., R.M. Bellon and J.A. Aguirre Gomez. 2001. Maize diversity, variety attributes, and farmers choices in Southeastern Guanajuato, Mexico. Economic Development and Cultural Change 50(1): 201-225.

32. Taylor, J.E., and Martin, P.L. 2000. Human capital: Migration and rural population change. In Handbook of agricultural economics, ed. G. Rausser and B. Gardner. New York: Elsevier.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

33. Taylor, J.E., Yunez-Naude, A., and G. Dyer. 1999. Agricultural price policy, employment, and migration in a diversified rural economy: a village-town CGE analysis from Mexico. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics 8 1(3): 653-662.

34. Van Dusen, ME, and J.E. Taylor. 2005. Missing markets and crop diversity: Evidence from Mexico. Environment and Development Economics 10(4): 513-531.

35. Van Dusen, ME. 2006. Missing markets, migration and crop biodiversity in the Milpa system of Mexico: A household farm model. In Valuing crop biodiversity: On farm genetic resources and economic change, ed. M. Smale. Wallingford, Oxon: CAB International.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
36. Wedel, M. and W. Kamakura. 2000. Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodologicalfoundations. Boston: Kiuwer Academic Publishers.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    
37. Zeven, AC. 1998. Local crop varieties: a review of definitions and classifications, Euphytica 1. RECENT IFPRI DISCUSSION PAPERS For earlier discussion papers, please go to wwwJfprLorq/pubs/pubs.htm#dp. All discussion papers can be downloaded for free.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
    

1. Changing with the Tide: Semiparametric Estimation of Preference Dynamics. (2014). Koster, Paul ; Dekker, Thijs ; Brouwer, Roy.
   In: Land Economics.
   RePEc:uwp:landec:v:90:y:2014:i:4:p:717-745.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

2. The impact of policy elements on the financing costs of RE investment: The case of wind power in Germany. (2011). Giebel, Olaf ; Breitschopf, Barbara.
   In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
   RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s112011.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

3. Estimating the Value of Achieving ‘Good Ecological Status’ under the Water Framework Directive in the Boyne River Catchment: A Mixed Multinomial Logit Approach. (2011). Hynes, Stephen ; Hanley, Nick ; Campbell, Danny ; Stithou, Mavra.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:ags:semrui:148928.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

4. Consumers’ Stated Choices versus Purchasing Desires: Case of Hawaii Food Baskets. (2009). Hu, Wuyang ; Cox, Linda.
   In: Agricultural Economics Review.
   RePEc:ags:aergaa:56632.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

5. Testing Different Types of Benefit Transfer in Valuation of Ecosystem Services: New Zealand Winegrowing Case Studies. (2009). Cullen, Ross ; Colombo, Sergio ; Baskaran, Ramesh.
   In: 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia.
   RePEc:ags:aare09:48189.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

6. Alternative Approaches to Incorporating the Opportunity Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Models. (2008). Crooker, John ; Azevedo, Christopher.
   In: Working Papers.
   RePEc:umn:wpaper:0803.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

7. Natural disturbances and natural hazards in mountain forests: a framework for the economic valuation. (2008). Notaro, Sandra ; Paletto, Alessandro.
   In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
   RePEc:trn:utwpde:0808.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

8. Introducing a genetically modified banana in Uganda: Social benefits, costs, and consumer perceptions. (2008). Wesseler, Justus ; Falck Zepeda, José ; Falck-Zepeda, Jose ; Kilkuwe, Enoch.
   In: IFPRI discussion papers.
   RePEc:fpr:ifprid:767.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

9. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiments method?. (2007). Rambonilaza, Tina.
   In: MPRA Paper.
   RePEc:pra:mprapa:9225.

   Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

10. Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science. (2007). Whitehead, John ; Pattanayak, Subhrendu ; Van Houtven, George L. ; Gelso, Brett R..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:apl:wpaper:05-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

11. Curbside recycling: Waste resource or waste of resources?. (2006). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
    RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:25:y:2006:i:4:p:855-874.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

12. Using Expert Judgment to Assess Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change: Evidence From a Conjoint Choice Survey. (2006). Chiabai, Aline ; Alberini, Anna.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa06p292.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

13. Discrete Choice Survey Experiments: A Comparison Using Flexible Models. (2006). Siikamäki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: RFF Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-05-60.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

14. DOES THE CONSUMERS VARIETY-SEEKING BEHAVIOR CONDITION THE WILLINGNESS TO TRAVEL FURTHER?. (2006). Nicolau, Juan.
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

15. A NEW MARKETING SEGMENTATION APPROACH BASED ON MARGINAL INDIVIDUAL UTILITIES: APPLYING CRM IS NOT A CHIMERA ANYMORE. (2006). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie EC.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2006-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

16. Using Surveys to Compare the Public’s and Decisionmakers’ Preferences for Urban Regeneration: The Venice Arsenale. (2006). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2006.137.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

17. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. (2005). Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Bech, Mickael.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:14:y:2005:i:10:p:1079-1083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

18. Public Preferences for Land usesÂ’ changes - valuing urban regeneration projects at the Venice Arsenale. (2005). Longo, Alberto ; Alberini, Anna ; Riganti, Patrizia.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa05p756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

19. Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand. (2005). Herriges, Joseph ; Jeon, Yongsik.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:12473.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

20. Estimating nonuse values using conjoint analysis. (2005). Turner, Robert W. ; Noddin, Laura ; Giuda, Alita .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2005:i:7:p:1-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

21. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). (2004). Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:909-912.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

22. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. (2004). Savage, Elizabeth ; Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:13:y:2004:i:9:p:901-907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

23. Time is Money: Improved Valuation of Time and Transportation Costs. (2004). Earnhart, Dietrich.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:29:y:2004:i:2:p:159-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

24. Altruism and the Economic Values of Environmental and Social Policies. (2004). Vázquez Rodríguez, María Xosé.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:233-249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

25. A RANDOM PARAMETER LOGIT APPROACH TO THE TWO-STAGE TOURIST CHOICE PROCESS: GOING ON HOLIDAYS AND LENGTH OF STAY. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

26. STOCHASTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF TOURISM DESTINATIONS. (2004). Nicolau, Juan ; Mas, Francisco J..
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2004-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

27. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare - transportation of farm animals to slaughter versus the use of mobile abattoirs. (2004). Lagerkvist, Carl-Johan ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Frykblom, Peter .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0149.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

28. Heterogeneous preferences for marine amenities: A choice experiment applied to water quality. (2004). Eggert, Håkan ; Olsson, Bjorn .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

29. Experience, Expectations and Hindsight: Evidence of a Cognitive Wedge in Stated Preference Retrospectives. (2004). Bishop, Richard ; Bennett, Michael ; Provencher, Bill.
    In: Staff Paper Series.
    RePEc:ecl:wisagr:468.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

30. A choice modelling approach to investigate biases in individual and aggregated benefit estimates due to omission of distance. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

31. Effects of distance on non-use values. (2004). Concu, Giovanni.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:200411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

32. Curbside Recycling: Waste Resource or Waste of Resources?. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0310001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

33. Cheap Talk Revisited: New Evidence from CVM. (2003). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: Others.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0301001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

34. Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics. (2003). Wright, Robert ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:12:y:2003:i:1:p:3-16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

35. Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope. (2003). Mourato, Susana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:24:y:2003:i:2:p:141-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

36. SELF IMAGE AND CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: HYPOTHETICAL AND ACTUAL WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Johansson-Stenman, Olof ; Svedsater, Henrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0094.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

37. Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48. (2002). Lancsar, Emily.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:her:chedps:48.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

38. A COMPARISON OF STATED AND REVEALED PREFERENCE METHODS FOR FISHERIES MANAGEMENT. (2002). Hicks, Robert.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19853.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

39. ARE STATED PREFERENCES INVARIANT TO THE PROSPECT OF REAL-MONEY CHOICE?. (2002). Swallow, Stephen ; Newell, Laurienne Whinstanley.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

40. Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation. (2001). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0052.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

41. LOGIT MODELS FOR POOLED CONTINGENT VALUATION AND CONTINGENT RATING AND RANKING DATA: VALUING BENEFITS FROM FOREST BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION. (2001). Siikamäki, Juha ; Siikamaki, Juha ; Layton, David F..
    In: 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL.
    RePEc:ags:aaea01:20616.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

42. Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple‐format, stated‐preference approach. (2000). Desvousges, William H. ; JOHNSON, REED F. ; Banzhaf, Melissa Ruby.
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:295-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

43. Combining averting behavior and contingent valuation data: an application to drinking water treatment. (2000). Nunes, Luis ; Ducla-Soares, Maria M. ; ROSADO, MARCIA A. ; Cunha-e-Sa, Maria A., .
    In: Nova SBE Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp392.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

44. Comparing Ranking and Contingent Valuation for Valuing Human Lives, Applying Nested and Non-Nested Logit Models. (2000). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:17:y:2000:i:1:p:1-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

45. Binary Choice Valuation Studies with Heteregeneous Preferences Regarding the Program Being Valued. (2000). Huhtala, Anni.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:16:y:2000:i:3:p:263-279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

46. Preference Structures, Property Rights, and Paired Comparisons. (1999). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:13:y:1999:i:1:p:107-122.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

47. What do doctors want? developing incentives for doctors to serve in Indonesias rural and remote areas. (1998). Widiyarti, ; Ismail, Nusye ; Chomitz, Kenneth M. ; Setiadi, Gunawan ; Azwar, Azrul.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:1888.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

48. Willingness to Pay for Quality Improvements: Can Revealed and Stated Preferences Data be Combined?. (1997). Whitehead, John ; Haab, Tim ; Huang, Ju-Chin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:wop:eacaec:9704.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

49. Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Air Quality in Hamilton-Wentworth: A Choice Experiment. (1997). .
    In: Department of Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:mcm:deptwp:1997-04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

50. Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. (1996). Englin, Jeffrey ; Cameron, Trudy.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:7:y:1996:i:2:p:133-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Report date: 2025-09-24 11:59:54 || Missing content? Let us know