Fuzzy-PI Torque and Flux Controllers for DTC with Multilevel Inverter of Induction Machines

International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive System (IJPEDS)
Vol. 5, No. 2, October 2014, pp. 268~282
ISSN: 2088-8694  268
Journal homepage: http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJPEDS
Fuzzy-PI Torque and Flux Controllers for DTC with Multilevel
Inverter of Induction Machines
N. M. Nordin1
, N. R. N. Idris2
, N. A. Azli3
, M. Z. Puteh4
, T. Sutikno5
1,2,3
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
4
MIMOS Berhad, Technology Park Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
5
Department of Electrical Engineering, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Article Info ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received Aug 19, 2014
Revised Sep 20, 2014
Accepted Oct 1, 2014
In this paper the performance of flux and torque controller for a Direct
Torque Control of Cascaded H-bridge Multilevel Inverter (DTC-CMLI) fed
induction machines are investigated. A Fuzzy-PI with fixed switching
frequency is proposed for both torque and flux controller to enhance the
DTC-CMLI performance. The operational concepts of the Fuzzy-PI with the
fixed switching frequency controller of a DTC-MLI system followed by the
simulation results and analysis are presented. The performance of the
proposed system is verified via MATLAB/Simulink©. The proposed system
significantly improves the DTC drive in terms of dynamic performance,
smaller torque and flux ripple, and lower total harmonic distortion (THD).
Keyword:
CMLI
Direct torque control
Fuzzy logic control
Induction machines
Multilevel inverter Copyright © 2014 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science.
All rights reserved.
Corresponding Author:
Nik Rumzi Nik Idris,
Departement of Electrical Power Engineering,
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,
81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia.
Email: nikrumzi@ieee.org / nikrumzi@fke.utm.my
1. INTRODUCTION
The superior performance of DTC in dynamic response and simple control configuration which is
originally introduced in [1], has made it one of the most popular research topics in electrical drive systems.
Since the application of high-power medium voltage in AC drives has shown rapid development, the use of
multilevel inverters in DTC scheme has become an important structure for further development and
improvement. Various technical papers have shown better performance of DTC scheme using multilevel
inverters [2-31].
By employing the multilevel inverter, the choices of voltage vectors that can be used to control the
torque and flux are increased. Different approaches have been proposed for DTC scheme using multilevel
inverter; hysteresis-based controller and non-hysteresis-based controller such as space vector modulation
(SVM)[8, 13, 16, 18, 22, 27-29, 31], predictive control strategy [10, 12, 30] and fuzzy logic controller
(FLC)[7, 9, 11, 22].
The implementation of the hysteresis-based control strategy has lead to a high torque ripple
especially in discrete implementation even with small hysteresis band. This is due to the delay in the
sampling time. On top of that, the variable switching frequency of the switching devices which leads to
unpredictable harmonics current is also produced by implementing the hysteresis-based control strategy.
As a result, some researchers have chosen to use non-hysteresis-based control strategies to overcome
these drawbacks. Significant improvements in terms of flux and torque ripple and switching frequency are
accomplished by using these control strategies; however the use of complex mathematical equations and

IJPEDS ISSN: 2088-8694 
Title of manuscript is short and clear, implies research results (First Author)
269
algorithms has led to the computational burden and complexity of the DTC-MLI scheme especially when the
level of voltage is increased.
In [6] the multilevel inverter in the DTC scheme employs a multilevel hysteresis controller.
Although the results have shown some significant improvements, as mentioned earlier, by using the
hysteresis-based controller the switching frequency of the power devices varies while the torque and flux
ripple can still be considered as high. A fuzzy-PI based controller for DTC was initially introduced in[32].
The controller has been used to replace the hysteresis controller while maintaining the use of a look-up table.
However the proposed controller has been applied to a 3-phase conventional inverter.
In this work a fuzzy-PI with the fixed switching frequency controller is utilized in the look-up table
based DTC drive. The proposed controller consists of a fuzzy logic controller and a triangular carrier
waveform. The fixed switching frequency is obtained by comparing the fuzzy logic output with the triangular
waveforms. A 5-level cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter (CMLI) is employed in this scheme. The
multiple isolated input DC sources of the CMLI are particularly suitable for electric vehicle (EV)
applications since the power source for an EV can be obtained from the battery modules. In the proposed
strategy, the fuzzy-PI with the fixed switching frequency controller will replace the multilevel hysteresis
controller for torque and flux control. Based on the proposed controller output together with the flux position,
an appropriate voltage vector can be selected from the look-up table. Figure 1 shows a proposed system block
diagram.
In this paper, the operational concepts of fuzzy-PI with the fixed switching frequency controller
followed by the simulation results and analysis on the performance of the proposed system are presented. The
results have shown that better dynamic performance, smaller torque and flux ripples, constant device
switching frequency and lower THD in the phase current are achieved.
Figure 1. Proposed system block diagram
2. BASIC PRINCIPLE OF DIRECT TORQUE CONTROL (DTC)
In Figure 2 the block diagram of DTC basic control which originally introduce by [1] is shown. By
having an instantaneous value of torque and flux which are calculated from the measured terminal variables
of induction machine (IM), both torque and flux errors can be determined. Based on the errors, an optimum
required voltage vectors are selected from the look-up tables to drive the IM.
The flux estimation is based on stator voltage vector equation in stationary reference frame which
can be written as
dt
d
iRv s
sss

 (1)
Over the small period of time, it is assumed that the voltage drop across the stator resistance can be
neglected. Therefore the equation can be rewrite as

 ISSN: 2088-8694
IJPEDS Vol. 5, No. 2, October 2014 : 268– 282
270
t
v s
s



 (2)
It’s clearly shows that the change in stator flux linkage vector, ∆ is directly affected by the
selection of stator voltage vector. Hence the stator flux locus can be controlled by selecting a suitable voltage
vectors.
As for the torque estimation, it based on the stator-rotor flux angle movement. The relationship
between stator-rotor flux angle and electromagnetic torque in stationary reference frame can be written as
srrssse PiPT  sin
2
3
2
3
 (3)
Where |ψs| and | ψr| are the magnitudes of stator flux and rotor flux linkages respectively and θsr is
the stator-rotor flux angle. When a voltage vector is applied, the stator flux linkage will move faster than
rotor flux linkage, where the rotor flux motion is lag behind the stator flux rotation. This is due to the to the
rotor and stator leakage inductances. Therefore the stator-rotor flux angle, θsr (hence torque) is affected by
the selection of appropriate voltage vector.
The abovementioned principle of both stator flux and stator-rotor angle movement are affected by
the variation of stator voltage is used in DTC scheme to achieve a desired flux trajectory and torque response.
Figure 2. Conventional DTC block diagram
3. 5 LEVEL CASCDED H-BRIDGE MULTILEVEL INVERTER
5-level CMLI consist of 2 H-bridge inverter (cell) connected in cascaded form with separated DC
source as shown in Figure 3. As for three-phase IM, each phase is fed by one 5-level CMLI. The
configuration of three-phase IM fed by 5-level CMLI is shown in Figure 4.
The number of voltage level, L for CMLI can be obtained by
(4)
Where n is a number of cell per phase. Each cell is connected in series. Therefore the total output
voltage of each phase can be determined by
∑ (5)
∑ (6)
∑ (7)

271
VaN, VbN and VcN is the phase output voltage with respect to the neutral, N. By considering each cell
produce {-VDC , 0 , VDC}, based on (5), (6) and (7), a 5-level output voltage for each phase is
, , , , (8)
The output voltages, VS generated by the inverter can be expressed in space phasor form as given in (9).
VS (t) = 2/3 (VaN (t) + aVbN (t) + a2
VcN (t) ) (9)
Where a = e j2π/3
and a2
= ej4π/3
. In d-q form, the output voltages can be defined as
(10)
√
(11)
Based on 5-level multilevel inverter, 53
= 125 combinations of phase voltage with 3L(L – 1) + 1 =
61 voltage vectors can be generated. This can give more degrees of freedom in choosing voltage vectors for
control purposes compared to the conventional 3-phase inverter. The higher the level of multilevel inverter,
the more the voltage vectors generated. Figure 5 illustrates the voltage vectors generated by 5-level CMLI on
a d-q plane.
Figure 3. 5-level cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter (CMLI) Figure 4. Three-phase IM fed by 5-level
CMLI

 ISSN: 2088-8694
272
Figure 5. Voltage vector generated by 5-level
CMLI
Figure 6. General structure of the Fuzzy-PI controller
4. THE PROPOSED CONTROLLER
The proposed controller is employed as an alternative to the hysteresis-based controller with the
benefit of operating at a fixed switching frequency with low torque and flux ripple. Prior knowledge of rotor
parameters is not required in designing a fuzzy-PI based controller. However, the fuzzy-PI performance is
highly affected by the normalization gain selection of a typical fuzzy logic controller.
The fuzzy-PI controller structure is based on the traditional PI controller [33]. The general structure
of the Fuzzy-PI controller is as shown in Figure 6. It has two inputs; system error, Err and the change of
system error, dErr , where Err = Yref – Yest and dErr = Err(t) – Err(t-Δt). Before these input values are fed into
the fuzzy controller, both values need to be normalized by using the input normalization gain (G0 and G1). As
for the fuzzy controller output, dOut , the value need to be denormalized using the output denormalization
gain, G2 before it can be used as a comparator input.
4.1 Fuzzy-PI torque controller
The proposed fuzzy-PI torque controller (FTC) consists of 6 triangular waveform generators, 6
comparators and a fuzzy-PI controller. The six triangular waveform generators generate 3 pairs of triangular
waveforms with the same magnitude but with different DC offset. Each pair (CUpper and CLower) is 180° out of
phase. In principle, the proposed controller will produce the same output as an 8-level hysteresis controller in
[6], which can be either one of the following torque error status; 3, 2, 1, +0.5, -0.5, -1, -2, -3. The number of
levels, however, must be realistic enough for implementation purposes. In other words, the higher the number
of levels, the faster in terms of processor requirement is needed for implementation. By comparing the
triangular waveforms with the fuzzy-PI controller output, a fixed switching frequency can be achieved.
Based on the general structure of fuzzy-PI controller, the FTC has two inputs; torque error, Terr and
the change of torque error, dTerr , where Terr = Tref – Test and dTerr = Terr(t) – Terr(t-Δt) and one output, dTO.
Figure 7 shows the block diagram of the FTC.
4.2 Fuzzy-PI flux controller
The proposed fuzzy-PI flux controller (FFC) consists of 4 triangular waveform generators, 4
comparators and a fuzzy-PI controller. The four triangular waveform generators generate 2 pairs of triangular
waveforms with the same magnitude but with different DC offset and similar to the FTC, each pair (CUpper
and CLower) is also 180° out of phase. In principle, the proposed controller will produce the same output as a
5-level hysteresis controller in [6], which can be either one of the following torque error status; 2, 1, 0, -1, -2.
Again, the number of levels chosen must be practical for implementation purposes.
Based on the general structure of fuzzy-PI controller, the FFC has two inputs; flux error, Flxerr and
the change of flux error, dFlxerr , where Flxerr = Flxref – Flxest and dFlxerr = Flxerr(t) – Flxerr(t-Δt) and one
output, dFlxO. Figure 8 shows a block diagram of FFC.

273
Figure 7. Fuzzy torque controller (FTC) block diagram Figure 8. Fuzzy flux controller (FFC) block
diagram
4.3 Fuzzification of inputs and outputs
Both FTC and FFC are using the same fuzzy control properties. The universe of discourse (UOD)
for the inputs and outputs are divided into 7 overlapping subsets, +3 to -3. Table 1 shows the definitions of
the fuzzy subsets in UOD.
Figure 9 shows the inputs and output membership functions of the fuzzy controller. Both inputs
and outputs are connected through the rules that emulate an ideal second order system response which is
expected to have good performance (response time, overshoot, damping factor and etc.) and system stability.
By using the IF-THEN rules, the inputs and outputs are connected using 49 rules since 7 overlapping subsets
are used. These rules are summarized and presented in the decision table as shown in Table 2.
Table 1. Fuzzy subsets definitions
Symbol Linguistic Terms Fuzzy Subsets
PL Positive Large +3
PM Positive Medium +2
PS Positive Small +1
Z Zero 0
NS Negative Small -1
NM Negative Medium -2
NL Negative Large -3
Table 2. Decision table of fuzzy control rules
Terr/Flxerr
dTerr/Flxerr
PL PM PS Z NS NM NL
PL PL PL PM PM PS PS Z
PM PL PM PM PS PS Z NS
PS PM PM PS PS Z NS NS
Z PM PS PS Z NS NS NM
NS PS PS Z NS NS NM NM
NM PS Z NS NS NM NM NL
NL Z NS NS NM NM NL NL

 ISSN: 2088-8694
274
Figure 9. Membership functions of the fuzzy controller
(a) First input variable (b) Second input variable (c) Output variables
4.4 Fuzzy controller gain selection
In order to get a smaller torque and flux ripple and fixed switching frequency, the fuzzy controller
gain must be properly selected to fulfill two main criteria of torque and flux controller:
i) Produce a good dynamics of flux and torque response.
ii) Absolute slope of the torque and flux controller output (TO and FlxO) must not exceed the absolute
slope of the triangular carrier to avoid multiple intersection and hence extremely high switching
frequency.
By using trial and error method, several combinations of gain (G0, G1, G2) have been found to
achieve the desired response. In general, lower values of G0 and G1 must be accompanied with a higher value
of G2 and vice versa.
The characteristic of each gain towards the system’s response can be clearly understood by
referring to Table 3. In this table, the changes of G0 and G1 will affect the torque and flux response time and
the controller output slope. Therefore the G2 value needs an opposite adjustment to compensate the
incremental or decremental effect produced by G0 and G1 in order to achieve the desired response. Fig. 10
shows an example of fuzzy controller output (TO or FlxO) with proper gain value.

275
Table 3. General response of fuzzy controller gain with the increasing and decreasing values of G0, G1 and
G2.
↑↑ and ↓↓ Denotes highly effected ↑ and ↓ Denotes moderately effected
Figure 10. Fuzzy controller output with proper gain
5. SIMULATION RESULTS
The proposed system and a hysteresis-based system have been simulated using
MATLAB/Simulink for validation purposes. Both systems use the same induction machines parameters as
shown in Table 4.
For the hysteresis-based system, the flux and torque hysteresis band is set to 10% of the rated
values. As for the Fuzzy-PI-based controller, the values of G0, G1 and G2 are set to 0.15, 0.01, 400 and 4,
0.008, 3000, for fuzzy torque and fuzzy flux controller respectively. The triangular carrier waveforms
frequencies for flux and torque fuzzy-PI based controller are 5 kHz and 10 kHz respectively.
5.1 Torque and flux step response
A step reference torque and flux at t = 0.01s has been applied to the DTC-CMLI system. Figure 11
and Figure 12 show a step response of flux and torque for both controllers respectively. It’s clearly indicated
that the proposed controller responds faster than the hysteresis controller where both torque and flux with
proposed controller achieved steady state at 0.0171s and 0.145s respectively while both torque and flux with
hysteresis controller achieved steady state at 0.0176s and 0.0151s respectively.
In the proposed controller (DTC-CMLI with fuzzy-PI controller), the designated fuzzy rules first
filtered and processed the error (torque and flux) to ensure the large error will appropriately trigger the
correct triangular. Consequently, the voltage vector with highest torque and flux increment (decrement) is
selected for large errors hence produce faster torque and flux response.
As for DTC-CMLI with hysteresis controller, the errors are directly controlled by hysteresis
controller which produces a slower response compared to proposed controller.
Gain
Torque & Flux Response Slope of TO
and FlxOResponse time Ripple
G0
Increasing ↑↑ ↑↑ ↑↑
Decreasing ↓↓ ↓↓ ↓↓
G1
Increasing ↓ ↓ ↑↑
Decreasing ↑ ↑ ↓↓
G2
Increasing ↑↑ ↑↑ ↑↑
Decreasing ↓↓ ↓↓ ↓↓

 ISSN: 2088-8694
276
Table 4. Parameter used in simulation
Induction Motor parameters Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter parameters
Nominal Power 1.5 kW VDC for each cell 120 V
Vline-line (rms) 400Vrms 50 Hz Power electronic device IGBT
Stator Resistance 3 Ω
Rotor Resistance 3.793 Ω Reference value
Stator Inductance 0.322188 H Torque reference 9 N.m
Rotor Inductance 0.330832 H Flux reference 0.9 Wb
Mutual Inductance 0.3049 H
Inertia 0.02799 kg.m2
Friction Factors 0.01025 N.m.s
Pole 2 pole
5.2 Torque and flux ripple
Figure 13 and Figure 14 show the flux and torque peak-to-peak ripples respectively for both
proposed controller and hysteresis controller. These figures clearly indicate the reduction of torque and flux
ripple as much as 10% in the proposed controller compared to the hysteresis controller.
Using the proposed controller in the system, the designated fuzzy rules for torque and flux
controller are properly monitored and corrected the level of errors to ensure that the output fuzzy controller
signals are within the appropriate triangle level hence appropriate voltage vector either to increase or
decrease torque or flux is selected and been applied consecutively within a triangle waveform period.
However by using the hysteresis controller in the system, the voltage vector is chosen based on the
comparison of raw error signal with the hysteresis band which the voltage vector for torque and flux
increasing or decreasing are applied for entire switching period.
Figure 11. Stator flux step response (a) Proposed controller (b) Hysteresis controller

277
Figure 12. Torque step response (a) Proposed controller (b) Hysteresis controller
Figure 13. Stator flux ripple (a) Proposed Controller (b) Hysteresis Controller

 ISSN: 2088-8694
278
Figure 14. Torque ripple (a) Proposed Controller (b) Hysteresis Controller
5.3 Switching frequency and THD in stator phase current
Figure 15 (a) and (b) show the frequency spectrum of the switching pattern, Sb23 for both proposed
controller and hysteresis controller respectively. DTC-CMLI with hysteresis controller suffers from the
varying device switching frequency. Variable switching frequency is undesirable since the switching
capability of the inverter is not fully utilized. Furthermore create an unpredictable harmonics in current flow.
Based on the spectrum in Figure 15 (b), the harmonics are widely distributed.
On the contrary, DTC-CMLI with proposed controller offers a constant switching frequency.
Based on the spectrum in Fig. 15(a), the harmonics are concentrated around the carrier frequency and it’s
multiple. The first harmonic for the proposed controller appear around 10 kHz which is the triangular
frequency of the torque loop controller. This is due to the torque switching is more dominant than flux
switching in DTC control scheme [32].
Figure 16 and Figure 17 show the stator phase current and stator phase current harmonic spectrum
respectively for both DTC-CMLI with proposed controller and DTC-CMLI with hysteresis controller. Based
on these figures, DTC-CMLI with proposed system with proposed controller produced a smoother sinusoidal
stator phase current with a lower current THD compared to the DTC-CMLI with hysteresis controller.

279
Figure 15. Frequency spectrum of the switching pattern, Sb23 (a) Proposed controller (b) Hysteresis controller
Figure 16. Stator phase current (a) Proposed controller (b) Hysteresis controller

 ISSN: 2088-8694
280
Figure 17. Stator phase current THD (a) Proposed controller (b) Hysteresis controller
6. CONCLUSION
A Fuzzy-PI with fixed switching frequency based torque and flux controller to enhance the DTC-
CMLI performance has been proposed. Its operational concept has been presented. The performance of the
proposed systems has been validated through simulations. From the results, with the proposed controller, the
torque and flux ripples have been reduced and is capable of producing good dynamic performance.
Regardless of the operating conditions, the devices’ switching frequency is able to be maintained at the
triangular frequency and producing low THD in stator phase current.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia for the financial
funding of this project with vote number 78590 and the Research Management Center (RMC) of Universiti
Teknologi Malaysia for their supports on research management and funding with vote number
Q.J1300002525.00H87.
REFERENCES
[1] I. Takahashi and T. Noguchi, "A new quick-response and high-efficiency control strategy of an induction motor,"
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, pp. 820-827, 1986.
[2] A. Alqudah, et al., "Control of variable speed drive (VSD) based on diode clamped multilevel inverter using direct
torque control and fuzzy logic," in Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (AEECT), 2013
IEEE Jordan Conference on, 2013, pp. 1-6.
[3] N. F. Alias, et al., "Improved performance of Direct Torque Control of Induction Machine with 3-level Neutral
Point Clamped multilevel inverter," in Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), 2013 International Conference
on, 2013, pp. 2110-2114.
[4] Y. Zhang, et al., "An improved direct torque control for three-level inverter-fed induction motor sensorless drive,"
Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 27, pp. 1502-1513, 2012.
[5] N. A. Azli, et al., "Direct Torque Control Of Multilevel Inverter-Fed Induction Machines – A Survey," Journal of
Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, vol. 41, pp. 060-070, 2012.

281
[6] N. M. Nordin, et al., "Direct Torque Control with 5-level cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter for induction
machines," in IECON 2011 - 37th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Melbourne, VIC
Australia, 2011, pp. 4691-4697.
[7] A. Mortezaei, et al., "Direct torque control of induction machines utilizing 3-level cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel
Inverter and fuzzy logic," in Applied Power Electronics Colloquium (IAPEC), 2011 IEEE Johor Bahru, Malaysia,
2011, pp. 116-121.
[8] Y. Zhang, et al., "An Improved Direct Torque Control for Three-Level Inverter-Fed Induction Motor Sensorless
Drive," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, p. 1, 2010.
[9] L. Youb, et al., "A new fuzzy logic direct torque control scheme of induction motor for electrical vehicles
application," in XIX International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), 2010 Rome, 2010, pp. 1-6.
[10] P. Urrejola, et al., "Direct torque control of an 3L-NPC inverter-fed induction machine: A model predictive
approach," in IECON 2010 - 36th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society Glendale, AZ, 2010,
pp. 2947-2952.
[11] S.-X. Liu, et al., "A novel fuzzy direct torque control system for three-level inverter-fed induction machine,"
International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 7, pp. 78-85, 2010.
[12] F. Khoucha, et al., "Hybrid cascaded H-bridge multilevel-inverter induction-motor-drive direct torque control for
automotive applications," Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 57, pp. 892-899, 2010.
[13] H. Alloui, et al., "A three level NPC inverter with neutral point voltage balancing for induction motors Direct
Torque Control," in XIX International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), 2010, Rome, 2010, pp. 1-6.
[14] H. F. A. Wahab and H. Sanusi, "Simulink Model of Direct Torque Control of Induction Machine," American
Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 1083-1090, 2008.
[15] R. Zaimeddine, et al., "An Improved Direct Torque Control Strategy for Induction Motor Drive," International
Journal of Electrical and Power Engineering, Medwell Journals, vol. 1, pp. 21 - 27, 2007.
[16] Y. Wang, et al., "Direct Torque Control with Space Vector Modulation for Induction Motors Fed by Cascaded
Multilevel Inverters," 2006, pp. 1575-1579.
[17] S. Kouro, et al., "Direct Torque Control With Reduced Switching Losses for Asymmetric Multilevel Inverter Fed
Induction Motor Drives," 2006.
[18] X. del Toro Garcia, et al., "New DTC Control Scheme for Induction Motors fed with a Three-level Inverter,"
AUTOMATIKA-ZAGREB-, vol. 46, p. 73, 2005.
[19] M. Bendyk, et al., "Investigation of direct torque control system fed by modified cascade of multilevel voltage
source inverter," IEEE Compatibility in Power Electronics, 2005, pp. 265-272, 2005.
[20] J. Rodríguez, et al., "Direct torque control with imposed switching frequency in an 11-level cascaded inverter,"
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 51, pp. 827-833, 2004.
[21] J. Rodr guez, et al., "Simple direct torque control of induction machine using space vector modulation," Electronics
Letters, vol. 40, 2004.
[22] X. del Toro, et al., "Direct torque control of an induction motor using a three-level inverter and fuzzy logic," in
Industrial Electronics, 2004 IEEE International Symposium on, 2004, pp. 923-927 vol. 2.
[23] M. A. M. Prats, et al., "A switching control strategy based on output regulation subspaces for the control of
induction motors using a three-level inverter," IEEE Power Electronics Letters, vol. 1, pp. 29-32, 2003.
[24] C. A. Martins, et al., "Switching frequency imposition and ripple reduction in DTC drives by using a multilevel
converter," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 12, pp. 286 -297, 2002.
[25] M. F. Escalante, et al., "Flying capacitor multilevel inverters and DTC motor drive applications," IEEE Transactions
on Industrial Electronics, vol. 49, pp. 809-815, 2002.
[26] Z. Tan, et al., "A direct torque control of induction motor based on three-level NPCinverter," 2001.
[27] U. Patil, et al., "Torque Ripple Minimization in Direct Torque Control Induction Motor Drive Using Space Vector
Controlled Diode-clamped Multi-level Inverter," Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 40, pp. 792-806,
2012.
[28] F. Khoucha, et al., "A comparison of symmetrical and asymmetrical three-phase H-bridge multilevel inverter for
DTC induction motor drives," Energy Conversion, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, pp. 64-72, 2011.
[29] G. Sheng-wei and C. Yan, "Research on torque ripple minimization strategy for direct torque control of induction
motors," in International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM), 2010 Taiyuan
2010, p. V1.

 ISSN: 2088-8694
282
[30] T. R. Obermann, et al., "Deadbeat-direct torque & flux control motor drive over a wide speed, torque and flux
operating space using a single control law," in Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2010 IEEE
Atlanta, GA 2010, pp. 215-222.
[31] S. Kouro, et al., "High-performance torque and flux control for multilevel inverter fed induction motors," IEEE
Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, pp. 2116-2123, 2007.
[32] F. Patkar, et al., "A New Fuzzy-PT-based Torque Controller for DTC of Induction Motor Drives," 2006, pp. 62-66.
[33] A. G. Perry, et al., "A design method for PI-like fuzzy logic controllers for DC–DC converter," Industrial
Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 54, pp. 2688-2696, 2007.

Fuzzy-PI Torque and Flux Controllers for DTC with Multilevel Inverter of Induction Machines

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Fuzzy-PI Torque and Flux Controllers for DTC with Multilevel Inverter of Induction Machines (20)

More from IJPEDS-IAES (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Fuzzy-PI Torque and Flux Controllers for DTC with Multilevel Inverter of Induction Machines