Modul 3.4: Design for Six Sigma
0 likes88 views
This document discusses Design for Six Sigma (DFSS), which is a methodology used to design products and processes so they will meet customer requirements and be robust to manufacturing and usage variations. It describes the IDDOV/DMADV process for DFSS, which includes identifying critical customer needs, defining specifications, designing concepts, optimizing the design, and validating and verifying the final design meets requirements. Tools used in each phase are also outlined, such as QFD, DOE, FMEA, and capability analysis. The document notes that while DMAIC projects focus on improving existing processes, DFSS is used to get new product and process designs right from the start and represents around 30% of Six Sigma projects.
Modul 3.4: Design for Six Sigma
- 1. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training Modul 3.4: Design for Six Sigma https://leanbase.de/onlineacademy
- 2. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma Design for Six Sigma – IDDOV Identify, Define, Design, Optimize, Validate &Verify or DMADV – Define, Measure, Analyse, Design, Verify
- 3. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma What ist Design for Six Sigma?
- 4. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma Get it the first time right!
- 5. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma P-Diagram of PEP – a meta view on DfSS Noise Product Engineering Process X (Input) Y (Product) Design • Needs • Requirements • Standards • Guidelines • Tools & methods • Communication • Specifications • Reviews & reports • Collaboration issues • Missalignment • Missunderstanding
- 6. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma Process • Customers • Understand and quantify customers‘ needs and requirements • Stakeholders • Corporate business goals, financial goals, business case • History • Evaluate historical external & internal data to find CTQs Tools • Customers – Surveys, VOC, Kano model – Tagushi loss function • Stakeholders – Stakeholder map, B/C – VOB, VOP, CTQ tree • History – 7 QC tools – Capability analysis – Regression analysis Identify
- 7. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma Process • Flow-down customer, stakeholder, gouvermental and historical critical to satisfaction Ys down to tangible CTQs and design Xs Tools • QFD • CTQ tree • Cause & Effect matrix • Tagushi loss function • Business Case • CTQ scorecard • Benchmarking • Product cost matrix (yield matrix) • Capability analysis Define
- 8. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma Process • Build concepts and evaluate them to CTQs and Xs • Simulate and explore product robustness to manufacturing and usage variation • Simulate and explore process robustness to product and manufacturing variation Tools • Pugh concept selection • Process mapping • Tagushi loss function • Simulations (lead times, yield, cost etc.) • FMEA (product, process, supply chain) • TRIZ • Robust engineering • DFM, DFA, DFT • Product cost matrix Design
- 9. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma • Run experiments • Analyze data • Set design and process parameters to optimize for robustness • DOE • Gauge R&R • Poka-Yoke • Capability analysis • ANOVA • TRIZ Process Tools • Robust engineering • DFM, DFA, DFT • Regression analysis • Fault trees • Product cost matrix • DMAIC Optimize
- 10. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma Process • Validate & verify product (and process) performance to CTQs and customer and stakeholder requirements • Set up appropriate product and process control mechanisms to establish long term quality assurance Tools • DOE • Gauge R&R • SPC • Poka-Yoke • Capability analysis • ANOVA • P-diagram • Regression analysis • Fault trees • DMAIC • Product cost matrix Validate & Verify
- 11. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma Validate vs. Verify = Effectivity vs. Efficiency
- 12. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma Effectivity will be validated Have we done the right thing? vs. Efficiency will be verified Have we done it right?
- 13. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma DMAIC ~ 70 % of all Six Sigma projects DFSS ~ remaining 30 % applicable in engineering, production, service, etc.
- 14. Lean Six Sigma White Belt Training — 3.4 Design for Six Sigma