IRJET- An Improvement of the Power Quality of Power Distribution System using Modified IUPQC Controller

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 4587
An Improvement of the Power Quality of Power Distribution System
Using Modified iUPQC Controller
G SRINIVASARAO, M.TECH
---------------------------------------------------------------------***----------------------------------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT: This paper exhibitsanenhancedcontrollerfor
the double topology of the bound together power quality
conditioner (iUPQC) developing its appropriateness in
force quality pay, and in addition in micro grid
Applications. By utilizing this controller, past the
traditional UPQC powerqualityelements,includingvoltage
Sag/swell , the iUPQC will likewise give receptive force
backing to manage the heap transport voltage as well as
the voltage at the network side Transport. At the end of
the day, the iUPQC will function as a static synchronous
compensator (STATCOM) at the lattice side, while giving
likewise the traditional UPQC pay at the heap ormicrogrid
Side. Trial results are given to check the new Usefulness
of the hardware.
Index Terms: iUPQC, microgrids, power quality, Static
synchronous compensator (STATCOM), unified Power
quality conditioner (UPQC).
I. INTRODUCTION
Surely control hardware gadgets have brought about
Extra ordinary innovative enhancements.Be thatasitmay,
the expanding number of force hardware driven burdens
utilized by and large as a part of the business has realized
extraordinary force quality issues.
Interestingly, control gadgets driven loads by and large
require perfect sinusoidal supply voltage so as to
capacity appropriately, while they are the most capable
ones for unusual symphonious streams level in the
Dissemination framework. In this situation, gadgets that
can alleviate these disadvantages have been Produced
throughout the years. A portion of the arrangements
include an adaptable compensator, known as the bound
together power quality conditioner (UPQC) [1]–[7] and
the static synchronous Compensator (STATCOM) [8]–
[13].
The force circuit of an UPQC comprises of a blend of a
shunt dynamic channel and an arrangement dynamic
Channel associated in a consecutive setup. This blend
permits the concurrent remuneration of the heap
current and the supply voltage, so that the repaid
current drawn from the framework and the repaid
supply voltage conveyed to the heap are keptadjusted And
sinusoidal. The double topology of the UPQC, i.e., the
iUPQC, was introduced in [14]–[19], where the shunt
dynamic channel carries on as an air conditioner voltage
source and the arrangement one as an air conditioner
current source, both at the basic Recurrence. This is a
key point to better outline the control picks up, and in
addition to streamline the LCL channel of the force
converters, which permits enhancing fundamentally the
general execution of the Compensator [20].
The STATCOM has been utilized generally as a part of
transmission net attempts to direct the voltage by Method
for element receptive force remuneration. These days, the
STATCOM is to a great extent utilized for voltage direction
[9], while the UPQC and the iUPQC have been chosen
as answer for more Particular applications [21]. In
addition, these last ones are utilized just as a part of
specific cases, where their generally high expenses are
legitimized by the force quality change it can give, which
would be unfeasible By utilizing customary arrangements.
By joining the additional usefulness like a STATCOM inthe
iUPQC gadget, a moreextensivesituationofutilizationscan
be come to, especially if there should be an occurrence of
disseminated era in shrewd lattices and as the Coupling
gadget in network tied microgrids.
In [16], the execution of the iUPQC and the UPQC Was
looked at when functioning as UPQCs. The fundamental
distinction between these compensators is the kind of
source imitated by the arrangement and Shunt power
converters. In the UPQC approach, the arrangement
converter is controlled as a no sinusoidal voltage source
and the shunt one as a no sinusoidal Current source.
Subsequently, progressively, the UPQC controllerneedsto
decide and orchestrate precisely the Constant voltage and
current to be adjusted. Then again, in the iUPQC
approach, the arrangement converter carries on as a
controlled sinusoidal current source and the shunt
converter as a controlled Sinusoidal voltage source. This
implies it is not important to decide the consonant
voltage and current to be adjusted, since the symphonious
voltages show up actually over the arrangement current
source and the consonant streams stream normally into
the shunt Voltage source.
In genuine force converters, as the exchanging
recurrence in-wrinkles, the force rate capacity is
Decreased. Along these lines, the iUPQC offers better
arrangements if contrasted and the UPQC if there should
arise an occurrence of high-power applications, since the
iUPQC repaying references are immaculate sinusoidal
waveforms at the key recurrence. Additionally, the UPQC
has higher changing misfortunes because of its higher
exchanging recurrence.

Fig. 1 Example of applicability of iUPQC
This paper proposes an enhanced controller, which grows
the iUPQC functionalities. This enhanced adaptation of
iUPQC controller incorporates all functionalities of those
past ones, including the voltage direction at the heap side
transport, and now giving additionally voltage direction at
the framework side transport, similar to a STATCOMtothe
lattice. Exploratory results are given to accept the new
controller outline.
This paper is sorted out in five areas. After this
presentation, in Section II, the iUPQC appropriateness is
clarified, and in addition the novel component of the
proposed controller. Area III displays the proposed
controller and an investigation of the force stream in
consistent state. At last, Sections IV and V give the trial
comes about and the conclusions, individually.
II. EQUIPMENT APPLICABILITY:
Keeping in mind the end goal to elucidate the materialness
of the enhanced iUPQC controller, Fig. 1 portrays an
electrical framework with two transports in spotlight, i.e.,
transport An and transport B. Transport A will be a basic
transport of the force framework that supplies touchy
loads and serves as purpose of coupling of a micro grid.
Transport B is a transport of the micro grid, where
nonlinear burdens are associated, which requires
premium-quality force supply. The voltages at transports
An and B must be managed, with a specific end goal to
legitimately supply the touchy burdens and the
energy and power flow control between the grid
and the micro grid (imposed by a tertiary control
layer for the micro grid);
reactive power support at bus A of the power
system;
voltage/frequency support at bus B of the micro
grid;
harmonic voltage and current isolation between
bus A and bus B (simultaneous grid-voltage and
load-current active-filtering capability);
Voltage and current imbalance compensation. The
functionalities (d)–(f) beforehand recorded were broadly
clarified and checked through reproductions and test
investigation [14]–[18], though the usefulness © Involves
the first commitment of the present work.Fig.2delineates,
in subtle element, the associations and estimations of the
iUPQC between transport an and transport B.
As indicated by the customary iUPQC controller, the shunt
converter forces a controlled sinusoidal voltage at
transport B, which relates to the previously mentioned
usefulness (d). Subsequently, the shunt converter has no
further level of flexibility as far as remunerating dynamic
or responsive force variables to grow its usefulness. Then
again, the arrangement converter of an ordinary iUPQC
utilizes just a dynamic force control variable p, keeping in
mind the end goal to orchestrate a principal sinusoidal
current drawn from transport A, relating to the dynamic
force requested by transport B. In the event that the dc
connection of the iUPQC has no substantial vitality
stockpiling framework or even no vitality source, the
control variable p likewise serves as an extra dynamic
force reference to the arrangement converter to keep the
vitality inside the dc connection of the iUPQCadjusted.For
this situation, the misfortunes in the iUPQC and the
dynamic influence supplied by the shunt converter must
be immediately repaid as an extra dynamic influence
infused by the arrangement converter into the transport
B.TheiUPQC can serve as:
a) smart‖ circuit breaker and as b) power flow controller
between the grid and the microgrid only if the
compensating active- andreactive-power referencesofthe
series converter can be set arbitrarily. In this case, it is
necessary to provide an energy source (or large energy
storage) associated to the dc link of the iUPQC.
The last level of opportunity is spoken to by a receptive
force control variable q for the arrangement converter of
the iUPQC. Along these lines, the iUPQC will give receptive
force remuneration like a STATCOM to the transport an of
the network. As it will be affirmed, this usefulness can be
included into the controller without debasing all different
functionalities of the iUPQC.
Fig: 2. Novel iUPQC controller.
The last level of flexibility is spoken to by a receptive force
control variable q for the arrangement converter of the

iUPQC. Along these lines, the iUPQC will give responsive
force remuneration like a STATCOM to the transport An of
the lattice. As it will be affirmed, this usefulness can be
included into the controller withoutcorruptingall different
functionalities of the iUPQC.
III. IMPROVED IUPQC CONTROLLER A. Main
Controller:
Fig. 2 delineates the iUPQC equipment and the deliberate
units of a three-stage three-wire framework that are
utilized as a part of the controller. Fig. 3 demonstrates the
proposed controller. The controller inputs arethevoltages
at transports An and B, the current requested by transport
B (iL), and the voltage vDC of the normal dc join. Theyields
are the shunt-voltage reference and the arrangement
current reference to the beat width regulation (PWM)
controllers. The voltage and current PWM controllers can
be as basic as those utilized in [18], or be enhanced further
to better manage voltage and current lopsidedness and
sounds [23]–[28].
Initially, the streamlined Clark change is connected to the
deliberate variables. As case of this change, the matrix
voltage in the αβ-reference edge can be figured as
The shunt converter forces the voltage at transport B. In
this way, it is important to integrate sinusoidal voltages
with ostensible plentifulness and recurrence.
Subsequently, the signs sent to the PWM controller are the
stage bolted circle (PLL) yields with plentifulness
equivalent to 1 p.u. There are numerous conceivable PLL
calculations, which could be utilized as a part of this case,
as confirmed in [29]–[33]. In the first iUPQC approach as
displayed in [14], the shunt-converter voltage reference
can be the PLL yields or the crucial positive-grouping part
VA+1 of the framework voltage (transport An in Fig. 2).
The utilization of VA+1 in the controller is valuable to
minimize the flowing force through the arrangement and
shunt converters, under ordinary operation, while the
adequacy of the framework voltage is inside a worthy
scope of size. Be that as it may, this is not the situation
here, in the altered iUPQC controller, since now the
network voltage will be additionally managed by the
adjusted iUPQC. As it were, bothtransportswill bedirected
freely to track their reference values. The arrangement
converter blends the current drawn from the matrix
(transport A). In the first approach of iUPQC,thiscurrentis
computed through the normal dynamic force required by
the heaps PL in addition to the force PLoss. The heap
dynamic force can be assessed by
Where iL_α, iL_β are the heap streams, and V+1_α, V+1_β
are the voltage references for the shunt converter. A low-
pass channel is utilized to acquire the normal dynamic
force (PL).
The misfortunes in the influence converters and the
circling influence to give vitality parity inside the iUPQC
are figured in a roundabout way from the estimationofthe
dc-join voltage. At the end of the day, theforcesignal PLoss
is dictated by a proportional– indispensable(PI)controller
(PI obstruct in Fig. 3), by contrasting the deliberate dc
voltage VDC and its reference esteem.
The extra control circle to give voltage direction like a
STATCOM at the network transport is spoken to by the
control signal STATCOM in Fig. 3. This control sign is
acquired through aPI controller, in which the information
variable is the mistake between the reference esteem and
the genuine total voltageoftheframework transport,given
by
The sum of the power signals PL and P Loss composes the
active-power control variable for the series converter of
the iUPQC(p) describedinSectionII.Likewise,STATCOMis
the reactive power control variable q. Thus, the current
references i+1α and i+1β of the series converter are
determined by
B. Power Flow in Steady State:
The accompanying strategy, in light of the normal force
stream, is helpful for assessing the force appraisals of the
iUPQC converters. For joined series– shunt power
conditioners, for example, the UPQC and the iUPQC, just
the voltage hang/swell unsettling influence and the force
component (PF) pay of the heap create a flowing normal
force through the force conditioners [34], [35]. As
indicated by Fig. 4, the compensation of a voltage
hang/swell unsettling influence at transport B causes a
positive sequence voltage at the coupling transformer (V
series_= 0),since VA = VB. Besides, V series and iPB in the
transformer prompts a coursing dynamic powerPinnerin
the iUPQC. Moreover, the pay of the heap PF builds the
current supplied by the shunt converter. The following
analysis is substantial for iUPQC acting like a conventional
UPQC or including the additional pay like a STATCOM.
To begin with, the coursing force will be ascertained when
the iUPQC is working simply like a traditional UPQC.
Thereafter, the conditions will incorporate the STATCOM
usefulness to the lattice transport A. In both cases, it will
be expected that the iUPQC controller can constrain the
shunt converter of the iUPQC to create basic voltage

dependably in stage with the framework voltage at
transport A. For effortlessness, the misfortunes in the
iUPQC will be ignored. For the main case, the
accompanying normal forces in unfaltering state can be
resolved:
Where SA and QA are the evident and receptive force
infused in the transport A; PB and QB are the dynamic and
responsive force infused in the transport B; P shunt and Q
shunt are the dynamic and responsive force depleted by
the shunt converter; P series and Q series are the dynamic
and responsive force supplied by the arrangement
converter, separately.
Conditions (5) and (8) are gotten from the imperative of
keeping unitary the PF at transport A. For this situation,
the present going through the arrangement converter is
capable just to supply the heap dynamic power, that is, itis
in stage (or counter stage) with the voltages VA and VB.
Along these lines, (7) can be expressed. Subsequently, the
intelligence of the force stream is guaranteed through (8).
In the event that a voltage droop or swell happens, P series
and P shunt won't be zero, and in this way, an internal
circle current (inner) will show up.The arrangement and
shunt converters and the previously mentioned dynamic
force (P inner) stream inside the equipment. It is
advantageous to characterize the accompanying
droop/swell component.
Considering VN as the ostensible voltage
From (5) and considering that the voltage at bus B is kept
regulated, i.e., VB = VN, it follows that
The circulating power is given by
From (11) and (12), it follows that
In this manner, (14) exhibits that P inner relies on the
active power of the heap and the droop/swell voltage
aggravation. So as to check the impact on the force rate of
the arrangement and shunt converters, a
Full load framework SB with PF extending from 0to1was
considered. It was additionally considered the hang/swell
voltage unsettling influence at transport A going k
sag/swell from 0.5 to 1.5. Along these lines theforcerating
of the arrangement and shunt converters are gotten
through (6)–(8) and (14).Fig. 5 portrays the clear force of
the arrangement and shunt power converters. In these
figures, the k sag/swell-hub and the PF-hub are utilized to
assess the force stream in the series and shunt power
converters as indicated by the list/swell voltageunsettling
influence and the heap power utilization, separately. The
force stream in the arrangement converter demonstrates
that a high power is required if there should be an
occurrence of list voltage aggravation with high dynamic
force load Utilization. In this circumstance, an increased P
inner arises and high appraised power converters are
important to guarantee the unsettling influence
remuneration. Also, if there should be an occurrence of
compensating sag/swell voltage unsettling influence with
high receptive force load utilization, just the shunt
converter has high power demand, since P inner
diminishes. It is imperative to highlight that, for each PF
esteem, the sufficiency of the clear power is the same for
capacitive or inductive burdens. At the end of the day, Fig.
5 is the same for QB capacitive or inductive. In the event
that the iUPQC performs all unique UPQC functionalities
together with the STATCOM functionality, the voltage at
bus A is also regulated with the same phase and
magnitude, that is,˙ VA= ˙VB = ˙VN, and then, the positive
sequence of the voltageat the coupling transformer is zero
(VSeries = 0). Thus, in steady state, the power flow is
determined by
Where STATCOM is the receptive force that gives voltage
control at transport A In a perfect world, the STATCOM
usefulness mitigates the inward circle dynamic force
stream (P inner), and the force stream in the arrangement
converter is zero. Thusly,if the arrangement converter is

legitimately planned alongsidethecouplingtransformer to
integrate the controlled streams I+1_α and I+1β, as
demonstrated inFig. 3, thena lowerpowerconvertercanbe
utilized. Conflictingly, the shunt converter still needs to
give the full receptive force of the heap furthermore to
deplete the responsive force infused by the
Arrangement converter to direct the voltageattransport A
Fig: 5. Apparent power of the series and shunt
Converters respectively.
TABLEI: IUPQC PROTOTYPE PARAMETERS
IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS:
The enhanced iUPQC controller, as appeared in Fig. 3, was
checked in a 5-kVA model, whose parameters are
displayed in Table I. The controller was installed in a
Settled point advanced sign processor (TMS320F2812).
Keeping in mind the end goal to confirm all the force
quality issues portrayed in this Paper the iUPQC was
associated with a network with a voltage list framework,
as delineated in Fig. 6. The voltage droop framework was
made by an inductor (LS), a resistor (Rrm Sag), and a
breaker (S Sag). To bring about voltage droop at transport
A, S Sag is closed. At to begin with, the source voltage
direction was tried with no load connected to transport B.
For this situation, the iUPQC carries on as a STATCOM and
the breaker S Sagis shut to bring about the voltage sag. To
confirm the matrix voltage direction (see Fig. 7), the
control of the STATCOM variable is empowered to make
(4) at instant = 0 s. In this exploratory case, LS = 10 mH,
and R Sag=7.5 Ω. Before the STATCOM variable is
empowered, just the dclink and the voltage at transport B
are managed, and there is a voltage list at transport an as
appeared in Fig. 7. After t = 0s, the iUPQC starts to draw
receptive current from transport an expandingthevoltage
untilits reference esteem. As indicated in Fig. 7, the heap
voltage at transport B is kept up managedamidconstantly,
and the network voltage regulation of transport A has a
quick reaction.
Fig. 7 iUPQC response at no load condition: (a) grid
voltages VA, (b) load voltages VB, and (c) grid
currents
Fig 6: iUPQC experimental scheme.
Fig. 8.iUPQC transitory response during the
connection of a three-phase diode rectifier: (a) load
currents, (b) grid currents, (c) load voltages and (d)
grid voltages.

Next, the experimental case was carried out to verify the
iUPQC performance during the connection of a nonlinear
load with the iUPQC already in operation. The load is a
three-phase diode rectifier with a series RL load at the dc
link (R = 45 Ω and L = 22 mH), and the circuit breaker SSag
is permanently closed, with Ls=10 mH and a RSag = 15 Ω. In
this way, the voltage-sag disturbance is increased due to
the load connection. In Fig. 8, it is possible toverifythatthe
iUPQC is able to regulate the voltages at both sides of the
iUPQC, at the same time. Indeed, even after the heap
association, at t=0 s, the voltages are still controlled, and
the streams drawn from transport An are practically
sinusoidal. Thus, the iUPQC can play out all the force
quality pay, as said some time recently, including the
framework voltage control. The same method was
performed with the association of a two-stage diode
rectifier, so as to better confirm the alleviation of force
quality issues.
The diode rectifier has the same dc load(R = 45 Ω and L =
22 mH) and the same voltage hang (LS = 10 mH and
RrmSag = 15 Ω). Fig. 9 delineates the brief reaction of the
heap association. Regardlessofthetwo-stageloadstreams,
after the heap association at t = 0 s, the three-stage current
depleted from the lattice has a decreased uneven part. For
this situation, the uneven current of the heap could be
supplied by the shunt converter, and the voltage at the
transport B could be precisely the voltagecombined bythe
shunt converter. Consequently, without channel inductor,
there would be no unbalance voltage drop in it and the
voltage at transport B would stay adjusted.
Fig: 9. iUPQC transitory response during the
Connection of a two-phase diode rectifier: (a) load
currents, (b) source currents, (c) load voltages and
Source voltages
V. CONCLUSION:
In this paper, presented all the force quality pay
components of an ordinary UPQC or an iUPQC, this
enhanced controller additionally imitates a STATCOM to
the network transport. This new element upgrades the
materialness of the iUPQC and gives new arrangements in
future situations including brilliant networks and micro
grids, including circulated era and vitality stockpiling
frameworks to better manage the inborn variability of
renewable assets, for example, sunlight based and wind
power. Moreover, the enhanced iUPQC controller may
legitimize the expenses and advances the iUPQC
appropriateness in force quality issues of basic
frameworks, where it is important an iUPQC or a
STATCOM, as well as both, at the same time.
Notwithstanding the expansion of one morepowerquality
pay include, the network voltage control lessens the
internal circle coursing power inside the iUPQC, which
would permit lower power rating for the arrangement
converter. The test comes about checked the enhanced
iUPQC objectives. The framework voltage direction was
accomplished with no heap, and in addition when
supplying a three-stage nonlinear burden.Theseoutcomes
have shown a reasonable execution of voltage direction at
both sides of the iUPQC.
REFERENCES:
[1] K. Karanki, G. Geddada, M. K. Mishra, and B.K.Kumar, A
modified three-phase four-wire UPQC topology with
reduced DC-link voltage rat-ing,‖ IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron., vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 3555–3566, Sep. 2013.
[2] V. Khadkikar and A. Chandra, ―A new control
philosophy for a unified power qualityconditioner(UPQC)
to coordinate load-reactive power demand betweenshunt
and series inverters,‖ IEEE Trans.PowerDel.,vol.23,no. 4,
pp. 2522–2534, Oct. 2008.
[3] K. H. Kwan, P. L. So, and Y. C. Chu, ―An output
regulation-based uni-fied power quality conditioner with
Kalman filters,‖ IEEE Trans. Ind.Electron., vol. 59, no. 11,
pp. 4248–4262, Nov. 2012.
[4] A. Mokhtatpour and H. A. Shayanfar, ―Power quality
compensation as well as power flow control using of
unified power quality conditioner,‖in Proc. APPEEC,2011,
pp. 1–4.
[5] J. A. Munoz et al., ―Design of a discrete-time linear
control strategy for a multicell UPQC,‖ IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron., vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 3797– 3807, Oct. 2012.
[6] V. Khadkikar and A. Chandra, ―UPQC-S: A novel
concept of simulta-neous voltage sag/swell and load
reactive power compensations utilizing series inverter of
UPQC,‖ IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 26, no. 9, pp.
2414–2425, Sep. 2011.
[7] V. Khadkikar, ―Enhancingelectricpowerqualityusing
UPQC: A comprehensive overview,‖ IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 2284–2297, May 2012.
[8] L. G. B. Rolim, ―Custom power interfaces for
renewable energy sources,‖ in Proc. IEEE ISIE, 2007, pp.
2673–2678.
[9] N. Voraphonpiput and S. Chatratana, ―STATCOM
analysis and con-troller design for power system voltage
regulation,‖ in Proc. IEEE/PESTransmiss. Distrib. Conf.
Exhib.––Asia Pac., 2005, pp. 1–6.
[10] J. Sanchez-Gasca, N. W. Miller, E. V. Larsen, A. Edris,
and A. Bradshaw, ―Potential benefits of STATCOM

application toimprovegenerationstationperformance,‖in
Proc. IEEE/PES Transmiss. Distrib.Conf.Expo.,2001,vol.2,
pp. 1123–1128. topology with reducedDC-link voltagerat-
ing,‖ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 3555–
3566, Sep. 2013.
[9] V. Khadkikar and A. Chandra, ―A new control
philosophy for a unified power quality conditioner(UPQC)
to coordinate load-reactive power demand betweenshunt
and series inverters,‖ IEEE Trans. PowerDel.,vol.23,no. 4,
pp. 2522–2534, Oct. 2008.
[10] K. H. Kwan, P. L. So, and Y. C. Chu, ―An output
regulation-based uni-fied power quality conditioner with
Kalman filters,‖ IEEE Trans. Ind.Electron., vol.59, no. 11,
pp. 4248–4262, Nov. 2012.
[11] A. Mokhtatpour and H. A. Shayanfar, ―Power quality
compensation as well as power flow control using of
unified power quality conditioner,‖in Proc. APPEEC,2011,
pp. 1–4.
Author Details
G. Srinivasarao
Associate Professor, Department of
Electrical and Electronics Engineering,
MITK, Khammam, T.S - 507163, India.

IRJET- An Improvement of the Power Quality of Power Distribution System using Modified IUPQC Controller

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to IRJET- An Improvement of the Power Quality of Power Distribution System using Modified IUPQC Controller (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

IRJET- An Improvement of the Power Quality of Power Distribution System using Modified IUPQC Controller