An Improved UPQC Controller to Provide Grid-Voltage Regulation

103 International Journal for Modern Trends in Science and Technology
Volume: 2 | Issue: 05 | May 2016 | ISSN: 2455-3778IJMTST
An Improved UPQC Controller to Provide
Grid-Voltage Regulation
Vijayraj Patel1
| Mr. Amit Agrawal2
| Dr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh3
1M.Tech. Scholar (Power Systems), Dept. of EEE, Dr. CVRU, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
2Assistant Professor, Dept. of EEE, Dr. CVRU, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
3HOD, Dept. of EEE, Dr. CVRU, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
In this paper presents an improved controller for the dual topology of the Unified Power Quality Conditioner
(UPQC) extending its capability in power quality compensation, as well as in micro-grid applications. By the
use of this controller, beyond the conventional UPQC power quality features including voltage sag/swell
compensation, the iUPQC will also compensate reactive power support to regulate not only the load-bus
voltage, but also the voltage at the grid-side bus. We can say, the iUPQC will work as a STATCOM at the grid
side, while providing also the conventional UPQC compensations at the load terminal or micro-grid side.
Experimental results are provided to verify the new functionality of the equipment.
KEYWORDS: UPQC, Micro-grid, Power quality, STATCOM, Unified Power Quality Conditioner
Copyright © 2015 International Journal for Modern Trends in Science and Technology
All rights reserved.
I. INTRODUCTION
Certainly, the devices which are used in
power-electronics have brought about great
technological improvements. However, the
increasing number of load which are driven by
power-electronic devices generally in the industry
has brought about uncommon power quality
problems. In contrast, the loads which are driven
by power-electronic devices generally require ideal
sinusoidal supply voltage for function properly,
whereas they are the most responsible ones for
abnormal harmonic currents level in the
distribution system. In this scenario, the devices
can mitigate these drawbacks have been developed
over the years. the solutions which is involve in this
flexible compensator, known as the Unified Power
Quality Conditioner (UPQC) [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
and the Static Synchronous Compensator
(STATCOM) [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13].In the power
circuit of a UPQC consists of a combination of a
shunt active filter and a series active filter
connected in a back-to-back configuration. This
combination allows the simultaneous
compensation of the load current and the supply
voltage, so that the compensated current drawn
from the grid and supply voltage delivered to the
load are compensated to keep balanced and
sinusoidal. The topology of the Unified Power
Quality Conditioner – the iUPQC – was presented
in[14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19],where the shunt active
filter behaves as an ac-voltage source and the
series one as an ac-current source, both at the
fundamental frequency This is a key point to
design a better control gains, as well as to optimize
the LCL filter of the power converters, which allows
improving significantly the overall performance of
the compensator [20].
The Static Synchronous Compensator
(STATCOM) has been used widely in transmission
networks to regulate the voltage with the help of
dynamic reactive-power compensation. Nowadays,
the STATCOM is largely used for voltage regulation
[9], while the UPQC and the iUPQC have been
selected as solution for more specific applications
[21]. Moreover, these last ones are used only in
specific cases, where their relatively high costs are
justified by the power quality improvement it can
provide, which would be not possible by using
conventional solutions. By joining the extra
functionality like a STATCOM in the iUPQC device,
then the applications of this can be used in wide
scenario, particularly in case of distributed
generation in smart grids and as the coupling
ABSTRACT

An Improved UPQC Controller to Provide Grid-Voltage Regulation
device in grid-tied micro-grid. In [16] the
performance of the iUPQC and the UPQC were
compared when working as unified power quality
conditioners. The main difference between these
compensators is the sort of source emulated by the
series and shunt power converters. In the UPQC,
the series converter is controlled as a
non-sinusoidal voltage source and the shunt one
as a non-sinusoidal current source. Hence, in
practical the UPQC controller has to determine and
synthesize accurately the harmonic voltage and
current to be compensated. On the another side, in
the iUPQC approach the series converter behaves
as controlled, sinusoidal, current source and the
shunt converter as a controlled, sinusoidal, voltage
source. This means that it is not necessary to find
out the harmonic voltage and current to be
compensated, since the harmonic voltages develop
naturally across the series current source and the
harmonic currents flow naturally into the shunt
voltage source.
In the power converters devices, as the
switching frequency has been increasing, the
power rate capability is reduced. Therefore, the
iUPQC offers better solutions if compare with the
UPQC in case of high-power applications, since the
iUPQC compensating references are pure
sinusoidal waveform at the fundamental
frequency. Moreover, the UPQC has higher
switching losses due its higher switching
frequency.
In this paper proposes an improved controller
which expands the iUPQC functionalities. This
modified version of iUPQC controller includes all
functionalities of those previous ones, including
the voltage regulation at the load-side bus, and
also providing voltage regulation at the grid-side
bus, like a STATCOM to the grid. Experimental
results are provided to validate the new controller
design. Paper has been prepared in five sections.
After this introduction, in section I, the iUPQC
applicability is explained as well as the novel
feature of the proposed controller. Section III
presents the proposed controller and an analysis of
the power flow in steady state. Finally, section IV
provides the experimental results and section V the
conclusions.
II. EQUIPMENT APPLICABILITY
In order to clarify the applicability of improved
iUPQC controller, Fig. 1 depicts an electrical
system with two buses in spotlight bus A and bus
B. Bus A is critical bus of the power system that
supplies sensitive loads and serves as point of
coupling of a micro-grid. Bus B is a bus of the
micro-grid where non-linear loads are connected,
which requires premium-quality power supply. The
voltages at bus A and bus B must be regulated in
order to supply properly the sensitive loads and the
non-linear loads. The effects caused by the
harmonic currents drawn by the non-linear loads
should be mitigated, avoiding harmonic voltage
propagation to bus A.
Figure 1 Example of applicability of iUPQC
The use of a STATCOM to guarantee the voltage
regulation at bus A is not enough, because the
harmonic currents drawn by the non-linear loads
are not mitigated. On the other hand, a UPQC or an
iUPQC between bus A and bus B can compensate
the harmonic currents of the non-linear loads and
compensate the voltage at bus B, in terms of
voltage harmonics, unbalance and sag/swell.
Nevertheless, this is still not enough to guarantee
the voltage regulation at bus A. Hence, to achieve
all the desired goals, a STATCOM at bus A and a
UPQC (or an iUPQC) between bus A and B should
be employed. However, the costs of this solution
would be unreasonably high. An attractive solution
would be the use of a modified iUPQC controller to
provide also reactive power support to the bus A,
beside all those functionalities of this equipment,
as presented in [16] and [18]. Note that the
modified iUPQC serves as an intertie between
buses A and B. Moreover, the micro-grid connected
to the bus B could be a complex system comprising
distributed generation, energy management
system and other control systems involving
micro-grid, as well as smart grid concepts [22].In
summary, the modified iUPQC can provide the
following functionalities.
“Smart” circuit breaker as an intertie between the
grid and the micro-grid.
Energy and power flow control between the grid
and the micro-grid (imposed by a tertiary control
layer for the micro-grid).
Reactive power support at bus A of the power
system.
Voltage/frequency support at bus B of the
micro-grid.

Harmonic voltage and current isolation between
bus A and bus B (simultaneous grid- voltage and
load-current active-filtering capability).
Voltage and current imbalance compensation.
The functionalities (d) to (f) listed above were
extensively explained and verified through
simulations and experimental analysis [14] [15]
[16] [17] [1 8], whereas the functionality (c)
comprises the original contribution of the present
work. Fig. 2 depicts in details the connections and
measurements of the iUPQC between bus A and
bus B.
Figure 2 A modified iUPQC configuration
According to the standard iUPQC controller, the
shunt converter imposes a controlled, sinusoidal
voltage at bus B, which corresponds to the
preceding functionality (d). As a result, the shunt
converter has no further degree of freedom in terms
of compensating active- or reactive-power variables
to expand its functionality. On the other hand, the
series converter of a conventional iUPQC uses only
an active-power control variable, p in order to
synthesize a fundamental, sinusoidal current
drawn from the bus A, corresponding to the active
power demanded by bus B. If the dc ink of the
iUPQC has no large energy storage system or even
no energy source, the control variable ̅also serves
as an additional active-power reference to the
series converter to keep the energy inside the dc
link of the iUPQC balanced. In this case, the losses
in the iUPQC and the active power supplied by the
shunt converter must be quickly compensated in
the form of an additional active power injected by
the series converter into the bus B. The iUPQC can
serve as (a) “smart” circuit breaker and as (b) Power
flow controller between the grid and the micro-grid
only if the compensating active- and reactive-power
references of the series converter can be set
arbitrarily. In this case, it is necessary to provide
an energy source (or large energy storage)
associated to the dc link of the iUPQC. The last
degree of freedom is represented by a
reactive-power control variable, q, for the series
converter of the iUPQC. During this method, the
iUPQC will provide reactive-power compensation
like a STATCOM to the bus A of the grid. As it will
be confirmed, this functionality can be added into
the controller without degrading all other
functionalities of the iUPQC.
III. IMPROVED IUPQC CONTROLLER
Fig. 2 depicts the iUPQC hardware and the
measured units of a three-phase three-wire system
that are used in the controller. Fig. 3 shows the
proposed controller. The controller inputs are the
voltages at bus A and B, the current demanded by
bus B, the current demanded by bus B, 𝑖 𝐿 and the
voltage 𝑣 𝐷𝐶 of the common dc link. The outputs are
the shunt-voltage reference and the series -current
reference to the PWM controllers. The voltage and
current PWM controllers can be as simple as those
employed in [18], or be improved further to better
deal with voltage and current imbalance and
harmonics [23] [24] [25]. Firstly, the simplified
Clark transformation is applied to the measured
variables. As example of this transformation, the
grid voltage in α β-reference frame can be
calculated as:
𝑉𝐴_𝛼
𝑉𝐴_𝛽
=
1 1/2
0 3
2
𝑉𝐴_𝑎𝑏
𝑉𝐴_𝑏𝑐
(1)
The shunt converter imposes the voltage at bus
B. Thus, it is necessary to synthesize sinusoidal
voltages with nominal amplitude and frequency.
Consequently, the signals sent to the PWM
controller are the Phase-Locked-Loop (PLL) outputs
with amplitude equal to 1 pu. There are many
possible PLL algorithms which could be used in
this case, as verified. In the original iUPQC
approach as presented in [14], the shunt-converter
voltage reference can be either the PLL outputs
or the fundamental positive-sequence
component 𝑉𝐴+1 of the grid voltage (bus A in Fig.
2).The use of 𝑉𝐴+1 in the controller is useful to
minimize the circulating power through the series
and shunt converters, under normal operation,
while the amplitude of the grid voltage is within an
acceptable range of magnitude. However, this is
not the case here, in the modified iUPQC controller,
since now the grid voltage will be also regulated by
the modified iUPQC. In other words, both buses
will be regulated independently to track their
reference values. The series converter synthesizes
the current drawn from the grid bus (bus A). In the

original approach of iUPQC, this current is
calculated through the average active power
required by the loads,𝑃𝐿 plus the power𝑃𝐿𝑂𝑆𝑆 . The
load active power can be estimated by:
𝑃𝐿 = 𝑉+1_ 𝛼
. 𝑖 𝐿_𝛼 + 𝑉+1_ 𝛽
. 𝑖 𝐿_𝛽
(2)
Where 𝑖 𝐿_𝛼 , 𝑖 𝐿_𝛽
are the load currents, and𝑉+1_ 𝛼
, 𝑉+1_ 𝛽
are the voltage references for the shunt converter.
A low pass filter is used to obtain the average active
power (𝑃𝐿). The losses in the power converters and
the circulating power to provide energy balance
inside the iUPQC are calculated indirectly from the
measurement of the dc-link voltage. In other
words, the power signal 𝑃𝐿𝑂𝑆𝑆 is determined by a
proportional-integral controller (PI block in Fig. 3),
by comparing the measured dc voltage,𝑉𝐷𝐶 , with its
reference value. The additional control loop to
provide voltage regulation like a STATCOM at the
grid bus is represented by the control signal in Fig.
3. This control signal is obtained through a PI
controller, in which the input variable is the error
between the reference value and the actual
aggregate voltage of the grid bus, given by:
𝑉𝑐𝑜𝑙 = √(𝑉𝐴+1_𝛼
2
+ 𝑉𝐴+1_𝛽
2
) (3)
The sum of the power signals 𝑃𝐿 and 𝑃𝐿𝑂𝑆𝑆
composes the active-power control variable for the
series converter of the iUPQC. P described in
section II. Likewise, 𝑄𝑆𝑇𝐴𝑇𝐶𝑂𝑀 is the reactive power
control variable q. Thus, the current references
𝑖 𝐿_𝛼 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑖 𝐿_𝛽
of the series converter are determined
by:
𝑖+1_𝛼
𝑖+1_𝛽
=
1
𝑉 𝐴_𝛼2+𝑉 𝐴_𝛽 2
𝑉𝐴+1_𝛼 𝑉𝐴+1_𝛽
𝑉𝐴+1_𝛽 −𝑉𝐴+1_𝛼
𝑃𝐿 + 𝑃𝐿𝑂𝑆𝑆
𝑄𝑆𝑇𝐴𝑇𝐶𝑂𝑀
(4)
The following procedure, based on the average
power flow, is useful for estimating the power
ratings of the iUPQC converters. For combined
series-shunt power conditioners, as the UPQC and
the iUPQC, only the voltage sag /swell disturbance
and the power factor compensation of the load
produce a circulating average power through the
power conditioners [34], [35].According to Fig. 4,
the compensation of a voltage sag/swell
disturbance at bus B causes a positive-sequence
voltage at the coupling-transformer the (𝑉𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 ≠ 0).
Since 𝑉𝐴 ≠𝑉𝐵 . Moreover 𝑉𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 and 𝑖 𝑃 𝐵
in the coupling
transformer leads to circulating active power,
𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 , in the iUPQC. Additionally, the
compensation factor increase the current supplied
by the shunt converter. The following analysis is
valid for an iUPQC acting like a conventional UPQC
or including the extra-compensation like a
STATCOM. Firstly, the circulating power will be
calculated when the iUPQC is operating just like a
conventional UPQC. Afterward, the equations will
include the STATCOM functionality to the grid bus
A. In both cases, it will be assumed that the iUPQC
controller is able to force the shunt converter of the
iUPQC to generate fundamental voltage always in
phase with the grid voltage at bus A. For simplicity,
the losses in the iUPQC will be neglected.
For the first case, the following average powers in
steady state can be determined.
𝑆𝐴 = 𝑃𝐵 (5)
𝑄𝑠ℎ𝑢𝑛𝑡 = -𝑄 𝐵 (6)
𝑄𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 𝑄 𝐴 = 0 var (7)
𝑃𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑢𝑛𝑡 (8)
Where 𝑆𝐴 and 𝑄 𝐴 are the apparent and reactive
power injected in the bus A; 𝑃𝐵 and 𝑄 𝐵 are the
active and reactive power injected to bus B. 𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑢𝑛𝑡
and 𝑄𝑠ℎ𝑢𝑛𝑡 are the active and reactive power
drained by the shunt converter. 𝑃𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 And 𝑄𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠
are the active and reactive power supplied by the
series converter. Equations (5) and (6) are derived
from the constraint of keeping unitary the power
factor at bus A.
Figure 3 iUPQC Power flow in steady-state
In this case, the current passing through the series
converter is responsible only for supplying the load
active power, that is, it is in phase (or counter-
phase) with the voltages 𝑉𝐴and 𝑉𝐵. Thus, (7) can be
stated. Consequently, the coherence of the power
flow is ensured through (8). If a voltage sag or
swell occurs𝑃𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 and𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑢𝑛𝑡 , be zero, and thus an
inner-loop current (𝐼𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 ) will appear. The series
and shunt converters and circulating active power
(𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 ) flows inside the equipment. It is convenient
to define the following sag/swell considering 𝑉𝑁as
the nominal voltage,
𝑘 𝑠𝑎𝑔 /𝑠𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙 =
𝑉𝐴
𝑉 𝑁
(9)
From (5) and considering that the voltage at bus B
is kept regulated, 𝑉𝐵=𝑉𝑁, it follows that
√3.𝑘 𝑠𝑎𝑔 /𝑠𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙 .𝑉𝑁.𝑖 𝑠 = √3.𝑉𝑁.𝑖 𝑃 𝐵
𝑖 𝑠=
𝑖 𝑃 𝐵
𝑘 𝑠𝑎𝑔 /𝑠𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙
= 𝑖 𝑃 𝐵
+𝐼𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 (10)

𝐼𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 = 𝑖 𝑃 𝐵
(
1
− 1) (11)
The circulating power is given by,
𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 = 𝑃𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑢𝑛𝑡 = 3(𝑉𝐵 − 𝑉𝐴) (𝑖 𝑃 𝐵
+ 𝐼𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 )(12)
From (11) and (12) it follows that
𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 = 3(𝑉𝐴 − 𝑉𝑁) (
𝑃 𝐵
3𝑉 𝑁
1
) (13)
𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 = 𝑃𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑢𝑛𝑡 =
1−𝑘 𝑠𝑎𝑔 /𝑠𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙
𝑃𝐵 (14)
Thus, (14) demonstrates that 𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 depends on the
active power of the load and the sag/swell voltage
disturbance. In order to verify the effect on the
power rate of the series and shunt converters, a full
load system 𝑆 𝐵 = √ (𝑃𝐵
2
+𝑄 𝐵
2
) = 1pu with power factor
ranging from 0 to 1 was considered the sag/swell
voltage disturbance at bus A ranging 𝑘 𝑠𝑎𝑔 /𝑠𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙 from
0.5 to 1.5.In this way, the power rating of the series
and shunt converter are obtained through (6), (7),
(8), and (14). Fig. 5 depicts the apparent power of
the series and shunt power converters. In these
figures, the axis and the power factor (PF) axis are
used to evaluate the power flow in the series and
shunt power converters according to the sag/swell
voltage disturbance and the load power
consumption, respectively. The power flow in the
series converter indicates that a high power is
required in case of sag voltage disturbance with
high active power load consumption. In this
situation, an increased 𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 arises and high
rated power converters are necessary to ensure the
disturbance compensation. Moreover, in case of
compensating sag/swell voltage disturbance with
high reactive power load consumption, only the
shunt converter has high power demand, since
𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 decreases. It is important to highlight that,
for each PF value, the amplitude of the apparent
power is the same for capacitive or inductive loads.
In other words, Fig. 5 is the same for 𝑄 𝐵 capacitive
or inductive. If the iUPQC performs all original
UPQC functionalities together with the STATCOM
functionality, the voltage at bus A is also regulated
with the same phase and magnitude, that is,
𝑉𝐴 = 𝑉𝐵 = 𝑉𝑁 and then the positive sequence of the
at the coupling transformer is zero (𝑉𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 0) Thus,
in steady state the power flow is determined by,
𝑆𝐴 = 𝑃𝐵 + j𝑄𝑆𝑇𝐴𝑇𝐶𝑂𝑀 (15)
𝑄𝑆𝑇𝐴𝑇𝐶𝑂𝑀 + 𝑄𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 𝑄𝑠ℎ𝑢𝑛𝑡 + 𝑄 𝐵 (16)
𝑄𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 0 var (17)
𝑃𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 = 0W (18)
Where 𝑄𝑆𝑇𝐴𝑇𝐶𝑂𝑀 is the reactive power that provides
voltage regulation at bus A. Ideally, the STATCOM
functionality mitigates the inner-loop active power
flow ( 𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 ) and the power flow in the series
converter is zero. Consequently, if the series
converter is properly designed along with the
coupling transformer to synthesize the controlled
currents 𝐼+1_𝛼and 𝐼+1_𝛽, as shown in Fig. 3, then a
lower power converter can be employed. Contrarily,
the shunt converter still has to provide the full
reactive power of the load and also to drain the
reactive power injected by the series converter to
regulate the voltage at bus A.
IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
The improved iUPQC controller as shown in Fig.
3 was verified in a 5 kVA prototype, In order to
verify all the power quality issues described in this
paper, the iUPQC was connected to a grid with a
voltage sag system, as depicted in Fig. 6. The
voltage sag system was composed by an inductor
(𝐿 𝑆), a resistor (𝑅𝑆𝐴𝐺 ) and a breaker (𝑆𝑆𝐴𝐺 ). To cause a
voltage sag at bus A, 𝑆𝑆𝐴𝐺 is closed.
Figure 4 Simulation Model
At first, the source voltage regulation was tested
with no load connected to bus B. In this case, the
iUPQC behaves as a STATCOM and the breaker
𝑆𝑆𝐴𝐺 is closed to cause the voltage sag. To verify the
grid voltage regulation, the control of the
𝑄𝑆𝑇𝐴𝑇𝐶𝑂𝑀 variable is enabled to compose the
equation (4) at instant t = 0s.In this experimental
case 𝐿 𝑆 = 10𝑚𝐻 , and 𝑅𝑆𝐴𝐺 =7.5Ω.Before the
𝑄𝑆𝑇𝐴𝑇𝐶𝑂𝑀 variable is enable, only the dc link and the
voltage at bus B are regulated, and there is 7.5.
Before the 𝑄𝑆𝑇𝐴𝑇𝐶𝑂𝑀 variable is enabled, only the dc
link and voltage at bus B are regulated, and there
is voltage sag at bus A, as shown in Fig8. After t =
0s, the iUPQC start to draw reactive power from
bus A, increasing the voltage value until the
reference value. As can be seen in Fig8, the load

voltage at bus B is maintained regulated during all
the time, and the grid- voltage regulation of bus A
has a fast response. Next experimental case was
carried out to verify the iUPQC performance during
the connection of non-linear load with the iUPQC
already in operation. The load is three phase diode
rectifier with a series RL load at the dc link (R =
45Ω and L = 22mH) and the circuit breaker is 𝑆𝑆𝐴𝐺
is permanently closed, with a𝐿 𝑠 = 10mH and a 𝑅𝑆𝐴𝐺
= 15Ω. In this way, the voltage sag disturbance is
increased due to the load connection. In this Fig7 is
possible to verify that the iUPQC is able to regulate
the voltage at both side of the iUPQC can perform
all power quality compensation as mentioned
before, including the grid voltage regulation. It is
important to highlight that the grid voltage
regulation is also achieved by means of the
improved iUPQC controller as introduced in section
III. Finally the same procedure was performed with
the connection of a two phase diode rectifier in
order to better verify the mitigation of power quality
issues. The diode rectifier has the same cd load(R =
45Ω and L = 22mH) and the same voltage sag (𝐿 𝑠 =
10mH and a 𝑅𝑆𝐴𝐺 = 15Ω).Fig 9 depicts the
transitory response of the load connection. Despite
the two phase load current, after the load
connection at t = 0s, the three phase current
drained from the grid has a reduced unbalanced
component. Likewise, the unbalance in the voltage
at bus A is negligible. Unfortunately, the voltage at
bus B has higher unbalance content. These
components could be mitigated if the shunt
compensator works as an ideal voltage source. i.e.
if the filter inductor could be eliminated. In this
case the unbalanced current of the load could be
supplied by the shunt converter and the voltage at
the bus B could be exactly the voltage synthesized
by the shunt converter. Therefore, without filter
inductor there would be no unbalance voltage drop
in it and the voltage at bus B would remain
balanced. However, in a practical case, this
inductor cannot be eliminated, and an improved
PWM control to compensate voltage unbalances, as
mentioned in section III, is necessary.
V. CONCLUSION
Here the Fig 5 and Fig 6 shows the simulation
result of UPQC when PI controller and ANN
controller are used respectively. The output
waveform of load voltage in Fig. 6 is more
sinusoidal and less harmonics in output.
Figure 5 Source & Load Voltage without load
using PI controller
Figure 6 Source & Load Voltage without load
using NN controller
Here we connect the load with UPQC by closing the
circuit breaker and Fig 7 and Fig 8 shows the
simulation result of UPQC when PI controller and
ANN controller are used respectively. In Fig 7 the
load voltage contain more harmonics compare to
the Fig 8 load voltage waveform. So concluded that
by using the ANN controller in UPQC can be
reduced the harmonics compare to the PI
controller.
Figure 7 Source and Load Voltage with load
using PI controller

Figure 8 Source and Load Voltage with load
using NN controller
REFERENCES
[1] K. Karanki, G. Geddada, M.K. Mishra, and B.K.
Kumar, "A Modified Three-Phase Four-Wire UPQC
Topology With Reduced DC-Link Voltage Rating,"
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 9, pp.
3555-3566, Sep. 2013.
[2] V. Khadkikar and A. Chandra, "A New Control
Philosophy for a Unified Power Quality Conditioner
(UPQC) to Coordinate Load-Reactive Power
Demand Between Shunt and Series Inverters,"
IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 23, no. 4, pp.
2522-2534, Oct. 2008.
[3] Kian Hoong Kwan, Ping Lam So, and Yun Chung
Chu, "An Output Regulation-Based Unified Power
Quality Conditioner With Kalman Filters," IEEE
Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 11, pp.
4248-4262, Nov. 2012.
[4] A. Mokhtatpour and H.A. Shayanfar, "Power
Quality Compensation as Well as Power Flow
Control Using of Unified Power Quality
Conditioner," in Power and Energy Engineering
Conference (APPEEC),2011 Asia-Pacific, 2011, pp.
1-4.
[5] J.A. Munoz et al., "Design of a Discrete-Time
Linear Control Strategy for a Multi-cell UPQC,"
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 10, pp.
3797-3807, Oct. 2012.
[6] V. Khadkikar and A. Chandra, "UPQC-S: A Novel
Concept of Simultaneous Voltage Sag/Swell and
Load Reactive Power Compensations Utilizing
Series Inverter of UPQC," IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2414-2425, 2011.
[7] V. Khadkikar, "Enhancing Electric Power Quality
Using UPQC: A Comprehensive Overview," IEEE
Trans. Power Electron., vol. 27, no. 5, pp.
2284-2297, 2012.
[8] L. G B Rolim et al., "Custom Power Interfaces for
Renewable Energy Sources," in Industrial
Electronics, 2007. ISIE 2007. IEEE International
Symposium on, 2007, pp. 2673-2678.
[9] N. Voraphonpiput and S. Chatratana, "STATCOM
Analysis and Controller Design for Power System
Voltage Regulation," in Transmission and
Distribution Conference and Exhibition: Asia and
Pacific, 2005 IEEE/PES, 2005, pp. 1-6.
[10] J. J. Sanchez-Gasca, N. W. Miller, E.V. Larsen, A.
Edris, and D. A. Bradshaw, "Potential benefits of
STATCOM application to improve generation
station performance," in Transmission and
DistributionConference and Exposition, 2001
IEEE/PES, vol. 2, 2001, pp. 1123--1128 vol.2.
[11] A.P. Jayam, N.K. Ardeshna, and B.H. Chowdhury,
"Application of STATCOM for improved reliability
of power grid containing a wind turbine," in Power
and Energy Society General Meeting – Conversion
and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st
Century, 2008 IEEE, 2008,1-7.
[12] C.A Sepulveda, J.A Munoz, J.R. Espinoza, M.E.
Figueroa, and P.E. Melin, "All-on-Chip dq-Frame
Based D-STATCOM Control Implementation in a
Low-Cost FPGA," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol.
60, no. 2, pp. 659-669, 2013.
[13] B. Singh and S.R. Arya, "Back-Propagation
Control Algorithm for Power Quality Improvement
Using DSTATCOM," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol.
61, no. 3, pp. 1204-1212, 2014.
[14] M. Aredes and R.M. Fernandes, "A dual topology of
Unified Power Quality Conditioner: The iUPQC," in
Power Electronics and Applications, 2009. EPE '09.
13th European Conference on, 2009, pp. 1-10.
[15] M. Aredes and R.M. Fernandes, "A unified power
quality conditioner with voltage SAG/SWELL
compensation capability," in Power Electronics
Conference, 2009. COBEP '09. Brazilian, 2009, pp.
218-224.
[16] B.W. Franca and M. Aredes, "Comparisons
between the UPQC and its dual topology (iUPQC)
in dynamic response and steady-state," in
IECON2011 - 37th Annual Conference on IEEE
Industrial Electronics Society, 2011, pp.
1232-1237.
[17] B.W. Franca, L.G.B. Rolim, and M. Aredes,
"Frequency switching analysis of an iUPQC with
hardware-in-the-loop development tool," in Power
Electronics and Applications (EPE 2011),
Proceedings of the 2011-14th European Conference
on, 2011, pp. 1-6.
[18] B.W. Franca, L.F. da Silva, and M. Aredes,
"Comparison between alpha-beta and DQ-PI
controller applied to IUPQC operation," in Power
Electronics Conference (COBEP), 2011 Brazilian,
2011, pp. 306-311.
[19] R.J. Millnitz dos Santos, M. Mezaroba, and J.C. da
Cunha, "A dual unified power quality conditioner
using a simplified control technique," in Power
Electronics Conference (COBEP), 2011 Brazilian,
2011, pp. 486-493.
[20] Yi Tang et al., "Generalized Design of High
Performance Shunt Active Power Filter With
Output LCL Filter," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol.
59, no. 3, pp. 1443-1452, Mar. 2012.

[21] H. Akagi, E. Watanabe, and M. Aredes,
Instantaneous Power Theory and Applications to
Power Conditioning. New York: Wiley-IEEE Press,
2007.
[22] J.M. Guerrero, Poh Chiang Loh, Tzung-Lin Lee,
and M. Chandorkar, "Advanced Control
Architectures for Intelligent Micro-grids-Part II:
Power Quality, Energy Storage, and AC/DC
Micro-grids," IEEE Trans.Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no.
4, pp. 1263-1270, Apr. 2013.
[23] S.R. Bowes and S. Grewal, "Novel harmonic
elimination PWM control strategies for three-phase
PWM inverters using space vector techniques," IEE
Proc. Electro. Power Appl., vol. 146, no. 5, pp.
495-514, 1999.
[24] M. Liserre, R. Teodorescu, and F. Blaabjerg,
"Multiple harmonics control for three-phase grid
converter systems with the use of PI-RES current
controller in a rotating frame," EEE Trans. Power
Electron., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 836-841, May. 2006.
[25] R. Teodorescu, F. Blaabjerg, U .Borup, and M.
Liserre, "A new control structure for rid-connected
LCL PV inverters with zero steady-state error and
selective harmonic compensation," in Applied
Power Electronics Conference and Exposition,
2004. APEC '04. Nineteenth Annual IEEE,vol. 1,
2004, pp.580--586 Vol.1.
BIOGRAPHIES
Vijayraj Patel has done B.E. in Electrical and
Electronics Engineering in O P Jindal Institute of
Technology, Raigarh currently pursuing his M. Tech. in
power system in CVRU, Kargi road, Kota, Bilaspur, C.G.,
India.
Mr Amit Agrawal has completed M.Tech.in Power
System in VJTI Pune and Currently Working as an
Assistant Professor in Electrical Dept. in Dr. C.V.R.U.
Dr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh has obtained M. Tech.
Degree in Electronics Design and Technology from
Tezpur University, Tezpur, Assam in the year 2003 PhD
in Electronics Engineering under the guidance of Prof A.
S.Zadgaonkar.

An Improved UPQC Controller to Provide Grid-Voltage Regulation

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Viewers also liked (16)

Similar to An Improved UPQC Controller to Provide Grid-Voltage Regulation (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

An Improved UPQC Controller to Provide Grid-Voltage Regulation