Altmetrics 2014-4-15-slideshare
- 1. Altmetrics: the movement, the tools, and the implications Kimberley R. Barker, MLIS Andrea Horne Denton, MILS Claude Moore Health Sciences Library University of Virginia Health System April 16, 2014 Creative Commons license: CC BY-NC-SA
- 2. Defining altmetrics • J. Priem (@jasonpriem), I like the term #articlelevelmetrics, but it fails to imply *diversity* of measures. Lately, I'm liking #altmetrics., 4:28 AM - 29 Sep 10, Tweet • “…the creation and study of new metrics based on the Social Web for analyzing, and informing scholarship.” – http://altmetrics.org/about/
- 4. Why should you care? Br J Sports Med doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092417
- 5. Before altmetrics… • Traditional products and measures of academic success – Publications – Conference presentations/posters – Committee work – Number of times your work was cited – Impact Factor and journal rank – H-index
- 6. From metrics to altmetrics Measures Traditional Research Products Traditional - Article - Chapter - Books Times Cited Impact Factor + Rank H-index
- 7. From metrics to altmetrics Measures Traditional New Research Products Traditional - Article - Chapter - Books Times Cited Impact Factor + Rank H-index Page Views Downloads
- 8. From metrics to altmetrics Measures Traditional New Research Products Traditional - Article - Chapter - Books Times Cited Impact Factor + Rank H-index Page Views New - Datasets - Blog post - Others None Downloads
- 9. What other additional scholarly contributions can you think of? • Blogs • Invited Interviews • Twitter • Facebook • Reddit
- 10. To recap: why the shift? • Academic work online – Articles - measured by page views, downloads, etc? – Academic work disseminated online, e.g. Figshare, SlideShare, etc. • Academic engagement on social platforms – i.e., serious discussion taking place on Twitter & Facebook In a nutshell, academics are engaging in non-traditional arenas and rightfully want credit for that engagement.
- 11. Other forces? • Additional scholarly contributions: – Data sets – Patents – Software – Copyrights NSF “Publications” broadened to “Products of Research” As of Jan 2013 “citable and accessible including but not limited to publications, data sets, software, patents, and copyrights."
- 12. How does “altmeasuring” work? • Altmetrics are measured, just as are more traditional metrics, such as published articles • New products require new measurements
- 13. Examples of new measurements • Downloads and page views • Track-backs • Tweets and retweets • Links from review services (e.g. Facultyof1000) • Sharing, social bookmarking
- 14. Tools
- 15. Old-ish tools • Google Analytics • Bit.ly • Spring Metrics (websites)
- 16. Emerging Tools • ImpactStory • Altmetric.com • PlumX
- 17. ImpactStory • Your impact profile on the web: we reveal the diverse impacts of your articles, datasets, software, and more • Jason Priem and Heather Piwowar • Free
- 19. Profile Details
- 20. Profile Details
- 21. Altmetric.com • London-based start-up • Funding from Digital Science (LabGuru, FigShare)
- 22. Altmetric’s widget (“donut”) • Used by publishers/journals • Nature Publishing, Cell Press • Royal Society of Chemistry as of Sept 2013 • BMJ specialty journals as of Oct 2013 • Springer • Etc • Etc
- 23. Altmetric Explorer • Subscription product – monitor, search and measure conversations about your publications and those of your competitors £45 a month
- 30. Altmetric Bookmarklet • Free • Reading a paper and want to find out its Altmetric details? Install the bookmarklet in your browser • When viewing the paper, “Altmetric it”
- 33. Plum Analytics • PlumX analysis tool • Bought by EBSCO, a provider of library subscription databases and journals
- 34. Plum Analytics • Plum Metrics – Usage (downloads, views, ILL) – Captures (favorites, bookmarks) – Mentions (blog posts, news, Wikipedia) – Social media (tweets, likes) – Citations (PubMed, Scopus, patents)
- 35. PlumX: the basics • Analysis tool aimed at helping institutions understand influence of researchers’ work through altmetrics • Compiles institutional repository data with other data sources • Works with customers to add initial data in bulk- individuals then claim info (can use ORCID ID) • Pitt PlumX “dashboard” https://plu.mx/pitt/g/ • Michael Pinsky, MD https://plu.mx/u/mpinsky
- 36. PlumX
- 37. Metrics Preview in Search Results
- 39. Artifact View
- 40. However…
- 41. The Debate… • Impact vs. attention • David C.’s Improbable Science… “Why you should ignore altmetrics and other bibliometric nightmares” http://www.dcscience.net/?p=6369 • Popular topics get higher counts, quickly, but then fade? How does this reflect quality?
- 42. The Debate… • Does social media help promote good science? Or not? (e.g. anti-vaccine)
- 43. Positives & Negatives • Positives – Speed of feedback – More complete picture of scholarly activities • Negatives – Not commonly recognized by scholars/administrators – Can be “gamed”
- 45. If you’re interested… • Some next steps: –Investigate use of measurement tools –Set up social media profiles and lurk –Experiment with low-commitment activities
- 46. See our LibGuide for further resources http://guides.hsl.virginia.edu/hsl-altmetrics