Antenna System Guide

Law Enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
National Institute of Justice
Antenna System Guide
NIJ Guide 202–00

The National Institute of Justice is a component of the Office of Justice
Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the
Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime.
ABOUT THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CORRECTIONS
STANDARDS AND TESTING PROGRAM
The Law Enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program is sponsored by the Office of Science and
Technology of the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), U.S. Department of Justice. The program responds to the mandate
of the Justice System Improvement Act of 1979, which directed NIJ to encourage research and development to improve
the criminal justice system and to disseminate the results to Federal, State, and local agencies.
The Law Enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program is an applied research effort that
determines the technological needsofjustice systemagencies, sets minimumperformance standardsfor specific devices,
tests commercially available equipment against those standards, and disseminates the standards and the test results to
criminal justice agencies nationally and internationally.
The program operates through:
The Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Advisory Council (LECTAC), consisting of nationally
recognized criminal justice practitioners fromFederal, State, and local agencies, which assesses technological needs and
sets priorities for research programs and items to be evaluated and tested.
The Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which
develops voluntary national performance standards for compliance testing to ensure that individual items of equipment
are suitable for use by criminal justice agencies. The standards are based upon laboratory testing and evaluation of
representative samples of each item of equipment to determine the key attributes, develop test methods, and establish
minimumperformance requirements for eachessential attribute. In addition to the highly technical standards, OLES also
produces technical reports and user guidelines that explain in nontechnical terms the capabilities of available equipment.
The National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (NLECTC), operated by a grantee, which
supervises a national compliance testing program conducted by independent laboratories. The standards developed by
OLES serve as performance benchmarks against which commercial equipment is measured. The facilities, personnel,
and testing capabilities of the independent laboratories are evaluated by OLES prior to testing each item of equipment,
and OLES helps the NLECTC staff review and analyze data. Test results are published in Equipment Performance
Reports designed to help justice system procurement officials make informed purchasing decisions.
Publications are available at no charge from the National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center.
Some documents are also available online through the Internet/World Wide Web. To request a document or additional
information, call 800–248–2742 or 301–519–5060, or write:
National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center
P.O. Box 1160
Rockville, MD 20849–1160
E-mail: asknlectc@nlectc.org
World Wide Web address: http://www.nlectc.org

U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
Antenna System Guide
NIJ Guide 202–00
W.A. Kissick, W.J. Ingram, J.M. Vanderau, R.D. Jennings
Institute for Telecommunication Sciences
Boulder, CO 80305–3328
Prepared for:
Office of Science and Technology
Washington, DC 20531
April 2001
NCJ 185030

The technical effort to develop this guide was conducted
under Interagency Agreement 94–IJ–R–004,
Project No. 97–030–CTT.
This guide was prepared by the
Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES)
of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
under the direction of A. George Lieberman, Program
Manager, Detection, Inspection, and Enforcement
Technologies, and Kathleen M. Higgins, Director of OLES.
The work resulting in this guide was sponsored by the
National Institute of Justice, Dr. David G. Boyd,
Director, Office of Science and Technology.

iii
FOREWORD
The Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES) of the National Institute of Standards and
Technology furnishes technical support to the National Institute of Justice program to strengthen
law enforcement and criminal justice in the United States. OLES’s function is to conduct
research that will assist law enforcement and criminal justice agencies in the selection and
procurement of quality equipment.
OLES is: (1) subjecting existing equipment to laboratory testing and evaluation, and
(2) conducting research leading to the development of several series of documents, including
national standards, user guides, and technical reports.
This document covers research conducted by OLES under the sponsorship of the National
Institute of Justice. Additional reports as well as other documents are being issued under the
OLES program in the areas of protective clothing and equipment, communications systems,
emergency equipment, investigative aids, security systems, vehicles, weapons, and analytical
techniques and standard reference materials used by the forensic community.
Technical comments and suggestions concerning this document are invited from all interested
parties. They may be addressed to the Director, Office of Law Enforcement Standards, National
Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–8102.
Dr. David G. Boyd, Director
Office of Science and Technology

v
BACKGROUND
The Office of Law Enforcement Standards (OLES) was established by the National Institute of
Justice (NIJ) to provide focus on two major objectives: (1) to find existing equipment which can
be purchased today, and (2) to develop new law-enforcement equipment which can be made
available as soon as possible. A part of OLES’s mission is to become thoroughly familiar with
existing equipment, to evaluate its performance by means of objective laboratory tests, to
develop and improve these methods of test, to develop performance standards for selected
equipment items, and to prepare guidelines for the selection and use of this equipment. All of
these activities are directed toward providing law enforcement agencies with assistance in
making good equipment selections and acquisitions in accordance with their own requirements.
As the OLES program has matured, there has been a gradual shift in the objectives of the OLES
projects. The initial emphasis on the development of standards has decreased, and the emphasis
on the development of guidelines has increased. For the significance of this shift in emphasis to
be appreciated, the precise definitions of the words “standard” and “guideline” as used in this
context must be clearly understood.
A “standard” for a particular item of equipment is understood to be a formal document, in a
conventional format, that details the performance that the equipment is required to give and
describes test methods by which its actual performance can be measured. These requirements are
technical and are stated in terms directly related to the equipment’s use. The basic purposes of a
standard are (1) to be a reference in procurement documents created by purchasing officers who
wish to specify equipment of the “standard” quality, and (2) to objectively identify equipment of
acceptable performance.
Note that a standard is not intended to inform and guide the reader; that is the function of a
“guideline.” Guidelines are written in nontechnical language and are addressed to the potential
user of the equipment. They include a general discussion of the equipment, its important
performance attributes, the various models currently on the market, objective test data where
available, and any other information that might help the reader make a rational selection among
the various options or alternatives available.
Kathleen Higgins
National Institute of Standards and Technology
April 2001

vii
CONTENTS
FOREWORD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii
COMMONLY USED SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. LAND MOBILE RADIO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1 Users . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2 Frequency Bands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.3 Rules and Regulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. ANTENNA FUNDAMENTALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1 History of the Antenna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.2 Frequency and Wavelength . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.3 Radiation Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4. ANTENNA CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.1 Gain and Directivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.2 Radiation Pattern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.3 Antenna Polarization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.4 Antenna Terminal Impedance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.5 Voltage Standing Wave Ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.6 Effective Length and Effective Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.7 Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5. ANTENNA TYPES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.1 Dipoles and Monopoles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.2 Base-Station Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.3 Corner Reflector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.4 Yagi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5.5 Log-Periodic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
5.6 Arrays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5.7 Unusual Antennas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5.8 Active Antennas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
5.9 Diversity Antennas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
6. TRANSMISSION LINES AND OTHER COMPONENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
6.1 Transmission Line Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
6.2 Baluns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
6.3 Duplexers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
6.4 Combiners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
6.5 Intermodulation Suppression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
6.6 Multicouplers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

viii
7. RADIO WAVE PROPAGATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
7.1 Transmission Loss and the Power Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
7.2 Free-Space Basic Transmission Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
7.3 Terrestrial Propagation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
7.4 Co-Site Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
8. ANTENNA SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
8.1 Define System Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
8.2 Design System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
8.3 Select Appropriate Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
9. INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND SAFETY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
9.1 Vehicular Antenna Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
9.2 Fixed-Site Antenna Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
9.3 Lightning Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
9.4 During Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
9.5 Perform Routine Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
10. ANTENNA SYSTEM RESOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
10.1 Internet Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
10.2 Periodicals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
10.3 Manufacturers’ and Vendors’ Catalogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
11. PROFESSIONAL AND STANDARDS ORGANIZATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
12. ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
13. REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
FIGURES
Figure 1. Elements of a radio system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Figure 2. The propagation of a plane electromagnetic wave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Figure 3. The horizontal-plane and vertical-plane patterns of a vertical
half-wavelength dipole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Figure 4. Vertical-plane radiation patterns [12] showing increasing complexity of
lobes and nulls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Figure 5. The vertical dipole and its electromagnetic equivalent, the vertical
monopole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Figure 6. Typical monopole antennas for (a) base-station applications and (b) mobile
applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Figure 7. Omnidirectional base-station antennas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Figure 8. A monopole antenna horizontal-plane pattern, base-station application. The
uniform maximum gain corresponds to the outer line on the polar plot . . . . . . . . . . 18
Figure 9. A folded-dipole antenna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Figure 10. Typical mobile antennas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Figure 11. A mobile antenna horizontal-plane pattern [13] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

ix
Figure 12. Corner reflector antennas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Figure 13. A typical corner-reflector antenna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Figure 14. A corner-reflector antenna horizontal-plane pattern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Figure 15. The Yagi antenna — (a) three elements and (b) multiple elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Figure 16. A typical Yagi antenna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Figure 17. A Yagi antenna horizontal-plane pattern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Figure 18. A log-periodic antenna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Figure 19. A typical log-periodic antenna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Figure 20. A log-periodic antenna horizontal-plane pattern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Figure 21. A typical vertical array using folded dipoles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Figure 22. Vertical-plane radiation patterns for (a) single half-wave dipole,
(b) two-element array, and (c) three-element array . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Figure 23. A coaxial collinear array . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Figure 24. A vertical-plane radiation pattern without “tilt” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Figure 25. A vertical-plane radiation pattern with 8/ “tilt” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Figure 26. A slot antenna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Figure 27. A simple active antenna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Figure 28. Common types of transmission lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Figure 29. Coaxial cables commonly used for LMR — (a) base station applications
and (b) mobile applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Figure 30. A VHF duplexer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Figure 31. Typical types of combiners — (a) hybrid combiner and
(b) cavity combiner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Figure 32. Intermodulation suppression device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Figure 33. A multicoupler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Figure 34. Gains and losses as described in the power-budget equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Figure 35. A propagation path illustrating direct and reflected rays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Figure 36. An example of diffraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
TABLE
Table 1. Characteristics of selected coaxial cable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

x
COMMONLY USED SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS
A ampere H henry nm nanometer
ac alternating current h hour No. number
AM amplitude modulation hf high frequency o.d. outside diameter
cd candela Hz hertz S ohm
cm centimeter i.d. inside diameter p. page
CP chemically pure in inch Pa pascal
c/s cycle per second IR infrared pe probable error
d day J joule pp. pages
dB decibel L lambert ppm parts per million
dc direct current L liter qt quart
/C degree Celsius lb pound rad radian
/F degree Fahrenheit lbf pound-force rf radio frequency
dia diameter lbf•in pound-force inch rh relative humidity
emf electromotive force lm lumen s second
eq equation ln logarithm (base e) SD standard deviation
F farad log logarithm (base 10) sec. section
fc footcandle M molar SWR standing wave ratio
fig. figure m meter uhf ultrahigh frequency
FM frequency modulation min minute UV ultraviolet
ft foot mm millimeter V volt
ft/s foot per second mph miles per hour vhf very high frequency
g acceleration m/s meter per second W watt
g gram N newton 8 wavelength
gr grain N•m newton meter wt weight
area=unit2
(e.g., ft2
, in2
, etc.); volume=unit3
(e.g., ft3
, m3
, etc.)
PREFIXES
d deci (10-1
) da deka (10)
c centi (10-2
) h hecto (102
)
m milli (10-3
) k kilo (103
)
: micro (10-6
) M mega (106
)
n nano (10-9
) G giga (109
)
p pico (10-12
) T tera (1012
)
COMMON CONVERSIONS (See ASTM E380)
0.30480 m = 1 ft 4.448222 N = 1 lbf
2.54 cm = 1 in 1.355818 J = 1 ft•lbf
0.4535924 kg = 1 lb 0.1129848 N m = 1 lbf•in
0.06479891g = 1gr 14.59390 N/m = 1 lbf/ft
0.9463529 L = 1 qt 6894.757 Pa = 1 lbf/in2
3600000 J = 1 kW•hr 1.609344 km/h = 1 mph
Temperature: T°C = (T°F-32)×5/9
Temperature: T°F = (T°C×9/5)+32

1
1. INTRODUCTION
Radio communications are essential to the
operations of Federal, State, and local law
enforcement and correction agencies.
Effective and reliable communications
systems not only enable personnel to
perform their functions efficiently, but also
help ensure their safety. It is, therefore, very
important that all components of a radio
communications system be selected and
integrated to produce an effective design.
Understanding the capabilities and
limitations of a communications system
ensures that it is used most effectively and
that performance expectations are realistic.
This guide focuses on a key portion
(subsystem) of the radio communications
system—the antenna system. Although the
antenna itself may be the most visible
element of radio communications
equipment, it is often the least understood.
This guide defines and describes the
components of the antenna system as well as
the fundamentals and characteristics of the
antenna itself.1
1.1 Scope
The theory and empiricism upon which
antenna technology is based are very
complex. It is not the purpose of this guide
to tutor the reader in the study of
electromagnetic theory. Rather, it is to
provide the reader with sufficient
understanding of the fundamentals,
characteristics, and functions of antennas to
enable him or her to develop requirements
and discuss antennas with vendors,
installers, repair shops, etc. To this end, the
number of equations and references to
theory are kept to a minimum, and the
information is generally restricted to the
kind of antennas used by law enforcement
agencies.
This guide is intended for a wide audience.
It is written so that the reader can study only
those sections of interest. Cross-referencing
is provided where needed to direct the reader
to related, important information.
1.2 Organization
Section 2 of this guide provides the reader
with a brief description of land mobile radio
(LMR), which is the radio service used by
nearly all law enforcement agencies. The
frequency bands used by LMR are
described. The information provided on
antennas in this guide is generally limited to
LMR applications and the radio frequencies
used by LMR.
Section 3 begins with an overview of the
major elements of a radio communications
system. The function of the antenna
(sub)system is described. The remainder of
the section provides a brief history of the
antenna and an introduction to the
fundamentals of antennas and radio wave
propagation. Several of the subsections are
important to the understanding of antennas.
These are section 3.2 on frequency and
wavelength and section 3.3 on radiation
principles. The reader is encouraged to
review the simple, but important, concepts
1
Certain commercial companies and their products and
information are identified in this report to specify adequately the
technical concepts and principles being presented. In no case does
such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the
National Institute of Justice, or any other U.S. Government
department or agency, nor does it imply that the sources, products,
and information identified are necessarily the best available for the
purpose.

2
in these subsections to fully understand the
following sections.
Section 4 is the most important part of this
guide, as it presents the engineering, or
functional, characteristics of antennas. It
defines gain, directivity, and radiation
pattern and how these are used in a radio
communications system design. These and
other characteristics are also used to specify
an antenna. Section 5 contains descriptions
of common antennas including their
electrical and radiation characteristics as
well as their physical characteristics.
Although there are many different kinds of
antennas, the emphasis is on those antennas
commonly used for LMR.
Sections 6 and 7 relate to the use of antennas
within a radio communications system.
Section 6 describes the transmission lines
and related components needed to connect
an antenna to a transmitter or a receiver, and
section 7 describes the modes of radio wave
propagation commonly used for LMR
systems. Section 7 also discusses how an
antenna pattern and propagation effects are
used to achieve required geographical
coverage.
The next three sections (8, 9, and 10) cover
the practical aspects of developing and
expressing requirements for an antenna; the
installation, maintenance, and safety of
antennas; and examples of some of the
products and services available, respectively.
Section 11 provides the reader with a list of
the relevant regulatory, standards, and
professional organizations. The last two
sections (12 and 13) provide reference
material. Section 12 is a list of acronyms
used in this guide or related to antennas.
Section 13 contains the references cited in
this guide.

3
2. LAND MOBILE RADIO
The formal title of the type of radio service
used by law enforcement agencies for their
radio communications is “land mobile
service,” and the frequency bands reserved
for their use are labeled “public safety.”
Land mobile service is defined as “a mobile
radio service between base stations and land
mobile stations, or between land mobile
stations,” by the National Telecommuni-
cations and Information Administration
(NTIA) [1]2
and the Federal Communi-
cations Commission (FCC) [2]. Another
commonly used phrase for “land mobile
service” is “land mobile radio” (LMR).
2.1 Users
There are two general classes of users. One
class of users is radio common carrier
(RCC). RCC owners build and operate LMR
systems and charge a fee to third parties that
actually use the system. The other class of
users includes groups that meet specific
requirements for LMR use. These groups
include: Public Safety Radio Services,
Special Emergency Radio Services,
Industrial Radio Services, Land Transpor-
tation Radio Services, Radio Location
Services, and Specialized Mobile Radio
Services. The first group listed here, the
Public Safety Radio Services, is the category
that includes State and local governments,
law enforcement and corrections, fire,
emergency medical services, highway
maintenance, and forestry conservation.
Federal law enforcement and corrections
agencies also belong to this category of
LMR users. These Federal agencies may use
some of the same frequency bands and
channels as State and local agencies, but, in
many cases, they use frequency bands and
channel assignments unique to the Federal
Government.
Most LMR user groups maintain formal
associations that provide for the exchange of
information within their groups and
represent their members before the FCC and
other official or government bodies. Those
associations relevant to the law enforcement
community include the Association of
Public-Safety Communications Officials
(APCO), the National Association of State
Telecommunications Directors (NASTD),
and the Telecommunications Industry
Association (TIA). The first two of these
represent the users, and the last represents
the manufacturers of the equipment used for
LMR. More details on these associations and
other relevant organizations are presented in
section 11.
2.2 Frequency Bands
There are a number of frequency bands
allocated for use by LMR. The particular
frequency ranges for these bands have been
established at the international level, in
plenipotentiary conferences, by the
International Telecommunications Union
(ITU). Administration and assignment of
frequencies within the LMR bands in the
United States are performed by two different
government agencies. The FCC provides
frequency assignments and licenses for all
non-Federal users. Federal users obtain their
frequency assignments through NTIA.
The LMR bands described in the following
sections are subdivided for Federal use only,
shared Federal and non-Federal use, and
2
Numerals in square brackets refer to references identified in
section 13.

4
non-Federal use only. Portions of some
bands may be shared with other services
such as maritime mobile, mobile satellite,
and broadcast television.
2.2.1 VHF Low-Band
This band is located at 25 MHz to 50 MHz
and generally uses channels 20 kHz wide.
Communications ranges can be the greatest
in this band; however, the radio signals do
not reflect effectively off hills, buildings,
and other surfaces, so there may be dead
spots within the general area of coverage of
a base station. These frequencies, especially
at the lower end of the band, are subject to
ionospheric “skip,” which can carry a signal
very long distances (and cause interference
to other users). This band also has the
highest level of ambient noise, which
reduces the performance of receivers
operating in this band compared to other,
higher frequency-bands.
2.2.2 VHF High-Band
This band is located at 150 MHz to
174 MHz and uses channels 25 kHz or
30 kHz wide. Adjacent channels may be
separated by 12.5 kHz to 15 kHz for
geographically separated systems. Radio
signals in this band have a shorter
propagation range, experience less noise
than those in the VHF low-band, and are not
subject to ionospheric “skip.” Diffraction
over hills and around other obstacles reduces
dead areas of coverage.
2.2.3 UHF Bands
The first UHF band is located at 406 MHz to
420 MHz and is designated for Federal
usage. The second band is located at
450 MHz to 470 MHz and is designated for
non-Federal usage. The last band, from
470 MHz to 512 MHz, shares spectrum with
UHF television channels 14 through 20 in a
few major urban areas. Channels in all three
UHF bands are 25 kHz wide. The
propagation range in the UHF band is even
less than that found in the VHF high-band;
however, the radio signals easily reflect off
hills and buildings, so dead areas are
generally very small.
2.2.4 700 MHz Band
New bands from 764 MHz to 776 MHz and
794 MHz to 806 MHz have been proposed
by the FCC. These new channels would be
converted from TV channels 63–64 and
68–69 to Public Safety use. The channels
would be either narrowband for voice plus
low-speed data or wideband (up to 150 kHz)
for high-speed data.
2.2.5 800/900 MHz Band
The portion of the radio spectrum from
806 MHz to 940 MHz is apportioned among
many services, including cellular telephone,
paging, nonpublic safety, and conventional
and trunked public safety. Federal
Government users, however, have no
authorizations in this spectrum. Channels for
public safety are reserved in blocks that are
generally 25 kHz wide. These blocks reside
in several locations within this portion of the
radio spectrum. These radio signals reflect
off hills, buildings, vehicles, etc., well
enough that dead areas are nearly
nonexistent. The propagation range for this
band is shorter than for the UHF bands.

5
2.3 Rules and Regulations
2.3.1 General
In the United States, the FCC allocates
different bands of the radio-frequency
spectrum to different entities for a wide
variety of commercial and private
applications [2]. The NTIA performs this
function for the Federal Government. In
recent years, with the proliferation of
portable phones and other mobile
communications devices, the FCC and the
NTIA have received an increasing number
of requests for an ever-dwindling amount of
spectrum available for allocation.
One way that the FCC and NTIA attempt to
maximize spectrum usage is to assign the
right to transmit over the same channel to
different commercial or private groups that
are located in different geographic regions,
so that their signal coverage areas will not
overlap. Consideration is also given when
assigning adjacent channels, so signals from
one transmission channel will not affect
adjacent channels.
Further description of the allocation process
and the most recent listing of allocations can
be found in the NTIA Manual of Regulations
and Procedures for Federal Radio
Frequency Management [1] and the Code of
Federal Regulations [3] pertaining to
telecommunications.
2.3.2 Future Options
At the present time, LMR bands are crowded
and channel assignments can be difficult to
obtain in some areas of the country. For this
reason, work is underway to develop new,
spectrally efficient modulation and signal-
processing methods and improved
techniques to share existing channels.
Historically, this problem has been
addressed by making narrower channels
within a band. Frequency-modulation (FM)
systems have been improved to allow them
to operate in bandwidths as small as
12.5 kHz. Further improvement requires
different modulation methods, but care must
be taken in choosing and standardizing the
modulation method and channel widths to
ensure interoperability among different
systems and equipment from different
manufacturers.
New LMR systems conforming to the
“Project 25" standard [4] use narrowband
modulation techniques and channel-sharing
methods (called trunking). These new digital
modulation methods will be able to use
channels as narrow as 6.25 kHz. Trunking
techniques will accommodate two, three, or
more times as many users for a given
number of channels.

7
3. ANTENNA FUNDAMENTALS
The antenna is often the most visible
element of a radio system. The sizes and
shapes of the conductors that comprise the
antenna determine the directional
characteristics of the electromagnetic (radio)
waves it radiates. However, the antenna
cannot be considered independently.
Additional elements, such as the
transmission line, duplexers, matching
networks, etc., must be considered as part of
the antenna system.
The full description of the interaction of an
antenna with its surrounding environment is
based on very complex mathematics, but its
function in a radio system is quite simple.
Figure 1 shows the key elements of a radio
communications system. When an antenna is
used for transmitting, it converts electrical
signals, delivered by a transmission line,
from a transmitter into propagating
electromagnetic waves. When an antenna is
used for receiving, it converts
electromagnetic waves back into electrical
signals that are delivered by a transmission
line to a receiver for processing. In fact, the
same antenna (used for both transmitting
and receiving) is often attached to a
transmitter and a receiver using either a
duplexer or a transmit/receive (XMT/RCV)
switch. A duplexer allows one antenna to be
used by both the transmitter and receiver at
the same time (see sec. 6.3), and a
transmit/receive switch connects the antenna
to either the transmitter or receiver.
3.1 History of the Antenna
Over a century has elapsed since James
Clerk Maxwell [5] formulated his celebrated
equations that provide the foundation of
classical electromagnetism. By means of
these equations, Maxwell was able to predict
the existence of electromagnetic waves
which, 20 years later in 1887, were
confirmed experimentally by Heinrich Hertz
[6]. Hertz constructed a center-driven wire
about 60 cm long, terminated at each end by
a 40 cm square metal plate. Driven by a
spark-gap generator (broadband source), this
antenna resonated at about 50 MHz and
effectively generated and radiated
Figure 1. Elements of a radio system

8
electromagnetic waves. He detected those
waves using a loop of wire, 35 cm in radius,
with a very small gap where he could
observe a spark. Although a number of
researchers became interested in this new
phenomenon, it was Gugliermo Marconi
who, in 1897, described and then
demonstrated a complete system for the
transmission of signals. On December 12,
1901, the first transatlantic communication
was achieved. The transmitting antenna in
Cornwall, England, was a fan-like structure
of 50 copper wires supported by a horizontal
wire stretched between two poles about
45 m high and 65 m apart. The receiving
antenna in Newfoundland was comprised of
copper wires supported by kites. By 1907,
commercial, transatlantic telegraph services
had been established [7].
It is interesting to note that the original,
commonly used term for a signaling system
that uses the phenomenon of
electromagnetic waves was “wireless.”
Although the term “radioconductor” (a
contraction of radiation conductor) appears
as early as 1897, the term “radio” does not
emerge until later. The Radio Ship Act of
1910 contains the terms “radio” and “radio-
communication” but not “wireless.” In 1912,
the U.S. Navy directed the use of the term
“radio” in place of “wireless” [8].
3.2 Frequency and Wavelength
A propagating electromagnetic wave exists
because of the fundamental interdependence
of the electric and magnetic fields that
comprise it. An electric field that changes
with time produces a magnetic field whose
strength is determined by the rate of change
of the electric field. And, in complementary
fashion, a magnetic field that changes with
time produces an electric field whose
strength is determined by the rate of change
of the magnetic field. This means that the
energy contained in, and transmitted by, the
radio wave is shared by the two fields.
When transmitting, the electrical current on
an antenna produces the magnetic field, and
the voltage on that antenna produces the
electric field. Similarly, when receiving, an
electromagnetic wave incident on the
antenna produces electrical current and
voltage. If these currents and voltages have a
sinusoidal time dependence (sine or cosine
wave), then several very important,
fundamental phenomena occur. The first
derivative (rate of change) of a sine wave is
another sine wave shifted in time by one
quarter of the period of the first sine wave.
This means that if the changing electric field
in the radio wave is sinusoidal, then so is the
magnetic field. These two sinusoidal time-
varying fields, in effect, regenerate each
other as they travel. This is called wave
propagation.
The frequency of a sine wave is expressed as
the number of cycles per second or hertz.
The period of the wave is the reciprocal of
its frequency and is expressed in seconds.
The wavelength is the length of one cycle of
the traveling wave in space, or the distance
the wave travels during one period. The
relationship between frequency and
wavelength is
where 8 is the wavelength (m), c is the
speed of light (2.9979 × 108
m/s), and f is
the frequency (Hz). A practical, approximate
version of this equation is
(1)

9
where 8 is in meters and f is in megahertz.
3.3 Radiation Principles
The important characteristics of an antenna
are its radiation properties, such as gain,
directionality, and polarization; and the
electrical property, input impedance. These
and other characteristics can be determined
theoretically, or they can be obtained by
measurement. In practice, both theory and
measurement are used to design or evaluate
an antenna.
The remainder of this section is necessary to
the understanding and usefulness of
section 4, Antenna Characteristics. Although
based in electromagnetic theory, these
fundamental principles are not complicated
and they are essential to an understanding of
antennas.
3.3.1 What Is an Antenna?
An antenna is a device that provides suitably
localized and oriented paths for oscillating
electric currents. The sizes and shapes of the
conductors that comprise the antenna
determine the directional characteristics of
the radio waves it radiates. A transmitting
antenna converts electrical currents,
delivered by the transmission line from a
transmitter, into propagating radio waves,
and a receiving antenna converts radio
waves back into electrical currents that are
delivered by a transmission line to a
receiver.
3.3.2 Reciprocity
The theoretical determination of an
antenna’s characteristics is usually
accomplished by treating the antenna as a
transmitting device. However, under most
conditions, the antenna characteristics are
exactly the same when it is used as a
receiving device. If the antenna is linear
(i.e., it contains neither active elements nor
nonlinear components such as ferrites), then
the principle of reciprocity holds. This
principle was first described by the famous
mathematician Lord Rayleigh [9]. The
principle of reciprocity means that an
antenna will have exactly the same
characteristics whether it is used for
transmitting or receiving. So, if a particular
characteristic of an antenna is obtained by
measurement while using the antenna for
reception, then it is known that the same
antenna will have exactly the same
characteristic when used for transmission.
3.3.3 Radiated Waves and the Near
Field
The electromagnetic field produced by an
antenna is quite complex near the antenna,
and it can be described as having several
components. Only one of these actually
propagates, or travels though space. This
component is called the radiated field,
radiated wave, or radio wave. The
propagation of this radiated field, or radio-
wave propagation, is usually treated as a
separate topic. The strength of the radiated
field does decrease with distance, as it must,
since the energy must spread as it travels.
Some knowledge of propagation is useful in
understanding antennas or in choosing an
antenna to meet certain requirements, such
as coverage—the area over which a radio
wave has sufficient strength to be useful.
(2)

10
Section 7 presents a brief overview of radio-
wave propagation.
The other components of the electro-
magnetic field remain near the antenna and
do not propagate. There are generally two
other components: the static field and the
induction field. Even though they do not
propagate, their strength decreases very
rapidly with distance. The entire field—all
of the components—near the antenna is
called the near field. In this region,
approximately one wavelength in extent, the
field strength can be relatively high and pose
a hazard to the human body. See
section 9.5.4 for more information on this
radiation hazard.
3.3.4 Plane Waves
The radiated wave, as with all
electromagnetic waves including light, is
composed of an electric field and a magnetic
field. For most cases, the field lines, and the
vectors that are used to illustrate them, are at
a right angle to each other and to the
direction of propagation, as shown in
figure 2.
At large distances from the antenna, say
beyond ten wavelengths, the radiated field is
essentially a plane wave. This means that
there is no curvature of the field lines.
3.3.5 Wave Polarization
The polarization of a wave, by definition, is
simply the orientation of the electric field
vector. The plane wave depicted in the
illustration of figure 2 is vertically polarized.
For nearly all cases encountered in LMR, the
polarization of the wave does not change as
it propagates. This is called linear
polarization, and the two most common
examples in practice are vertical or
horizontal polarization. Other polarizations
include circular, where the electric field
vector (and the magnetic field vector) rotate
as the wave travels.
Figure 2. The propagation of a plane
electromagnetic wave

11
4. ANTENNA CHARACTERISTICS
In a radio communications system, an
antenna has two basic functions. The
primary function is to radiate, as radio
waves, the RF signals from the transmitter,
or to convert radio waves into RF signals for
processing by a receiver. The other function
is to direct the radiated energy in the desired
direction or directions, or to be “sensitive”
to reception from the desired direction or
directions. Another, often overlooked, aspect
of an antenna’s directional properties is the
suppression of radiation in undesired
directions, or the rejection of reception from
undesired directions.
The directional characteristics of an antenna
are fundamental to an understanding of the
antenna and how it is used in a radio
communications system. These interrelated
characteristics include gain, directivity,
radiation (antenna) pattern, and
polarization. Other characteristics such as
beamwidth, effective length, and effective
aperture are derived from the four listed
above. Terminal (input) impedance is one
other characteristic that is of fundamental
importance. It is necessary to know the
impedance of an antenna in order to
efficiently couple the transmitter’s output
power into it, or to efficiently couple the
power from it into the receiver. All of these
antenna characteristics are a function of
frequency.
4.1 Gain and Directivity
The gain of an antenna is the radiation
intensity3
in a given direction divided by the
radiation intensity that would be obtained if
the antenna radiated all of the RF power
delivered to it equally in all directions [10,
11]. Note that this definition of gain requires
the concept of an isotropic radiator; that is,
one that radiates the same power in all
directions. Examples of nondirectional
sources can be achieved (at least
approximately) with sound and light; these
are sometimes called point sources.
An isotropic antenna, however, is just a
concept, because all practical radio antennas
must have some directional properties.
Nevertheless, the isotropic antenna is very
important as a reference. It has a gain of
unity (g = 1 or G = 0 dB) in all directions,
since all of the power delivered to it is
radiated equally well in all directions.
Although the isotrope is a fundamental
reference for antenna gain, another
commonly used reference is the dipole. In
this case the gain of an ideal (lossless) half-
wavelength dipole is used. Its gain is 1.64
(G = 2.15 dB) relative to an isotropic
radiator.
The gain of an antenna is usually expressed
in decibels (dB). When the gain is
referenced to the isotropic radiator, the units
are expressed as dBi; but when referenced to
the half-wave dipole, the units are expressed
as dBd. The relationship between these units
is
Directivity is the same as gain, but with one
difference. It does not include the effects of
power lost (inefficiency) in the antenna
3
Radiation intensity is defined as the power density in terms of
power per unit solid angle.
(3)

12
itself. Recall that the definition of gain is
based on the power delivered to (and
accepted by) the antenna. In practice, some
of that power is lost in the antenna due to
ohmic losses (heating) in the elements,
leakage across insulators, etc. If an antenna
were lossless (100 % efficient), then the gain
and directivity (in a given direction) would
be the same.
4.2 Radiation Pattern
The radiation pattern (also called antenna
pattern) is a representation of the gain of an
antenna for all directions. Since this is a
three-dimensional description of the power
density, it is difficult to display or use. It is
common to display or plot cross-sections of
it. Figure 3 shows the radiation pattern of a
vertical half-wavelength dipole in the
horizontal plane and a vertical plane. As one
can see in this figure, the patten in the
horizontal plane has no structure. This
antenna has constant gain versus azimuth.
On the other hand, the pattern in a vertical
plane shows that the antenna has maximum
gain in the horizontal plane and no radiation
in the directions coincident with the axis of
the antenna. Therefore, one can now
visualize the three-dimensional pattern as a
torus (doughnut shaped).
Often, the direction is not specified when
referring to an antenna’s gain. In this case, it
is assumed that the gain’s direction is the
direction of maximum radiation—the
maximum gain for the antenna. An
associated pattern then will present values
relative to that maximum gain.
4.2.1 Lobes and Nulls
The regions of a pattern where the gain has
local maxima are called lobes, and those
places where the gain has local minima are
called nulls. The vertical plane “cut” for the
half-wave dipole (fig. 3b) has two lobes and
two nulls. Figure 4 shows several other
examples. A complex antenna pattern may
have many lobes and nulls in both the
horizontal-plane and vertical-plane patterns.
The lobe with the greatest gain is called the
main lobe or main beam of the antenna. If a
single value of gain is given for an antenna,
it is assumed to be the main lobe or main
beam gain.
Figure 3. The horizontal-plane and
vertical-plane patterns of a vertical half-
wavelength dipole

13
Figure 4. Vertical-plane radiation patterns [12] showing
increasing complexity of lobes and nulls
4.2.2 Beamwidth
Beamwidth is an angular measure of the
main lobe (or main beam) in either (or both)
the horizontal-plane or vertical-plane pattern
[11]. There are several definitions for
beamwidth, including: half-power or 3 dB
beamwidth, 10 dB beamwidth, and first-null
beamwidth. The 3 dB beamwidth is the
angular extent about the maximum value of
gain for which the gain is 3 dB below the
maximum. First-null beamwidth is the
angular extent about the maximum value of
gain of the first occurring local minima in
the pattern. The half-power, or 3 dB,
beamwidth is most commonly used.
4.3 Antenna Polarization
The term polarization has several meanings.
In a strict sense, it is the orientation of the
electric field vector E at some point in space.
If the E-field vector retains its orientation at
each point in space, then the polarization is
linear; if it rotates as the wave travels in
space, then the polarization is circular or
elliptical. In most cases, the radiated-wave
polarization is linear and either vertical or
horizontal. At sufficiently large distances
from an antenna, e.g., well beyond
10 wavelengths, the radiated, far-field wave
is a plane wave (see sec. 3.3.4).
The term polarization is often applied to the
antenna itself. In this sense, the polarization
of the antenna is the polarization of the
plane wave it radiates. Based on the
principle of reciprocity (see sec. 3.3.2), this
is true for a receiving antenna, as well. For
example, if a receiving antenna is vertically
polarized, this means that a vertically
polarized, incoming wave will produce
maximum output from that antenna. If the
incoming wave were polarized at some other
angle, only the vertical component would be
detected by the antenna. Ideally, a
horizontally polarized incoming wave would
not be detected at all by a vertically
polarized antenna. Vertical polarization is
used for most LMR applications.
4.4 Antenna Terminal Impedance
There are three different kinds of impedance
relevant to antennas. One is the terminal
impedance of the antenna, another is the
characteristic impedance of a transmission
line, and the third is wave impedance.
Antenna terminal impedance is discussed in
this section. Transmission line characteristic
impedance is discussed in section 6, and
wave impedance is the ratio of the electric
field strength to the magnetic field strength
of a propagating wave (see sec. 3.2 and
sec. 3.3.4).

14
(5)
Terminal impedance is defined as the ratio
of voltage to current at the connections of
the antenna (i.e., the point where the
transmission line is connected). The
complex form of Ohm’s law defines
impedance as the ratio of voltage across a
device to the current flowing through it. The
terminal impedance is expressed
mathematically as
where Z is the impedance, in ohms, V is the
voltage, in volts, and I is the current, in
amperes, at the antenna terminals for a given
frequency. Each of these variables can be
expressed as a complex number, each with
real and imaginary parts. Such complex
numbers can also be expressed by using a
magnitude and phase angle—this is called
phasor notation.
The real part of the impedance is called the
resistive component, and the imaginary part
is called the reactive component. This is
often expressed as
where R is the resistive (real) component, X
is the reactive (imaginary) component, and
j = .
−1
The most efficient coupling of energy
between an antenna and its transmission line
occurs when the characteristic impedance of
the transmission line and the terminal
impedance of the antenna are the same and
have no reactive component. When this is
the case, the antenna is considered to be
matched to the line.
Matching usually requires that the antenna
be designed so that it has a terminal
impedance of about 50 S or 75 S to match
the common values of available coaxial
cable. A half-wave dipole can be shortened
slightly to achieve this. For other antennas, it
can be difficult to remove (reduce to zero)
the reactive component. In these cases, a
matching network is often made part of the
antenna to change its complex terminal
impedance into something that better
matches a transmission line.
The resistive part R of the terminal
impedance is the sum of two components
and is expressed in ohms,
The radiation resistance Rr is the “effective
load” that represents the power radiated by
that antenna as radio waves, and the
dissipative resistance Rd is the “load” into
which power is lost. The efficiency of an
antenna is the ratio of the power radiated to
the total power delivered to the antenna. It
can be expressed as
As discussed in section 4.1, the dissipative
losses are due to ohmic losses (heating) in
the antenna elements, leakage across
insulators, and similar effects. Furthermore,
it should be noted that the efficiency of an
antenna can also be expressed as the ratio of
the gain to the directivity (for a given
direction).
(4)
(6)
(7)

15
4.5 Voltage Standing Wave Ratio
The standing wave ratio (SWR), also known
as the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR),
is not strictly an antenna characteristic, but is
used to describe the performance of an
antenna when attached to a transmission
line. It is a measure of how well the antenna
terminal impedance is matched to the
characteristic impedance of the transmission
line. Specifically, the VSWR is the ratio of
the maximum to the minimum RF voltage
along the transmission line. The maxima and
minima along the lines are caused by partial
reinforcement and cancellation of a forward-
moving RF signal on the transmission line
and its reflection from the antenna terminals.
If the antenna terminal impedance exhibits
no reactive (imaginary) part and if the
resistive (real) part is equal to the
characteristic impedance of the transmission
line, then the antenna and transmission line
are said to be matched. If this is true, then
none of the RF signal sent to the antenna
will be reflected at its terminals. There is no
standing wave on the transmission line and
the VSWR has a value of one. However, if
the antenna and transmission line are not
matched, then some fraction of the RF signal
sent to the antenna is reflected back along
the transmission line. This causes a standing
wave, characterized by maxima and minima,
to exist on the line. In this case, the VSWR
has a value greater than one.
The VSWR is easily measured with a device
called an SWR meter. It is inserted in the
transmission line and directly gives a value
for the VSWR. At a VSWR value of 1.5,
approximately 4 % of the power incident at
the antenna terminals is reflected. At a value
of 2.0, approximately 11 % of the incident
power is reflected. VSWR values of 1.1 to
1.5 are considered excellent, values of 1.5 to
2.0 are considered good, and values higher
than 2.0 may be unacceptable.
As stated above and elsewhere, an ideal
match between the antenna and transmission
line is desired; but this can often be achieved
only for a single frequency. In practice, an
antenna may be used for an entire frequency
band, and its terminal impedance will vary
across the band. In an antenna specification,
either the impedance versus frequency
across a band is given or the VSWR versus
frequency is given.
4.6 Effective Length and Effective Area
The effective length and the effective area
(also called effective aperture) are
alternative ways of expressing the gain of an
antenna. These characteristics are most
useful and meaningful when the antenna is
used for receiving. Of course, due to the
principle of reciprocity, these characteristics
are the same if the antenna is used for
transmitting.
The effective length defines the ability of an
antenna to produce a voltage at its terminals
from an incident electric field. It is defined
as
where Re is expressed in meters, V is the
open circuit voltage in volts, and E is the
electric field strength in volts/meter. This
definition assumes that the polarization of
the incident field and the antenna are the
same. The effective length can also be
computed from the gain and the radiation
resistance.
(8)

16
(10)
Effective area, or aperture, is more
commonly used than effective length. It is
defined as
where Pr is the power available at the
terminals of the antenna in watts, and p is
the power density of the incident wave in
watts per square meter. The relationship
between effective area and gain is
4.7 Bandwidth
Bandwidth is the difference between two
frequencies, or the frequency range, within
which the performance of an antenna is
acceptable. In other words, one or more
characteristics (e.g., gain, pattern, terminal
impedance) have acceptable values between
the bandwidth limits. For most antennas,
gain and pattern do not change as rapidly
with frequency as the terminal impedance
does, so the latter is often used to describe
the bandwidth of an antenna.
VSWR (see sec. 4.5) is a measure of the
effect of mismatch between an antenna’s
terminal impedance and the transmission
line characteristic impedance. Since the
transmission line characteristic impedance
hardly changes with frequency, VSWR is a
useful, practical way to describe the effects
of terminal impedance and to specify an
antenna’s bandwidth. For example, an
antenna specification may give a plot of the
VSWR across some frequency band. It will
likely have a minimum value at about the
middle of the band. Another way of
specifying the bandwidth is a statement of
the maximum VSWR within a band.
Half-wave dipoles, and similar antennas,
have a narrow bandwidth. Other antennas,
like the log-periodic, are designed
specifically to be broadband.
(9)

17
Figure 5. The vertical dipole and its
electromagnetic equivalent, the vertical
monopole
5. ANTENNA TYPES
Antennas can be classified in several ways.
One way is the frequency band of operation.
Others include physical structure and
electrical/electromagnetic design. The
antennas commonly used for LMR—both at
base stations and mobile units—represent
only a very small portion of all the antenna
types.
Most simple, nondirectional antennas are
basic dipoles or monopoles. More complex,
directional antennas consist of arrays of
elements, such as dipoles, or use one active
and several passive elements, as in the Yagi
antenna.
New antenna technologies are being
developed that allow an antenna to rapidly
change its pattern in response to changes in
direction of arrival of the received signal.
These antennas and the supporting
technology are called adaptive or “smart”
antennas and may be used for the higher-
frequency LMR bands in the future.
5.1 Dipoles and Monopoles
The vertical dipole—or its electromagnetic
equivalent, the monopole—could be
considered one of the best antennas for LMR
applications. It is omnidirectional (in
azimuth) and, if it is a half-wavelength long,
has a gain of 1.64 (or G = 2.15 dBi) in the
horizontal plane. A center-fed, vertical
dipole is illustrated in figure 5(a). Although
this is a simple antenna, it can be difficult to
mount on a mast or vehicle. The ideal
vertical monopole is illustrated in
figure 5(b). It is half a dipole placed in half-
space, with a perfectly conducting, infinite
surface at the boundary.
A monopole over an infinite ground plane is
theoretically the same (identical gain,
pattern, etc., in the half-space above the
ground plane) as the dipole in free space. In
practice, a ground plane cannot be infinite,
but a ground plane with a radius
approximately the same as the length of the
active element, is an effective, practical
solution. The flat surface of a vehicle’s trunk
or roof can act as an adequate ground plane.
Figure 6 shows typical monopole antennas
for base-station and mobile applications.

18
Figure 6. Typical monopole antennas for
(a) base-station applications and (b) mobile
applications
Figure 7. Omnidirectional base-station
antennas
Figure 8. A monopole antenna horizontal-
plane pattern, base-station application. The
uniform maximum gain corresponds to the
outer line on the polar plot
5.2 Base-Station Applications
For base-station installations (where an
omnidirectional pattern is desired), there are
two practical implementations of the vertical
dipole. The first type is the sleeve antenna,
as illustrated in figure 7(a). The sleeve
antenna is a vertical dipole with the feed
(transmission line) entering from one end of
a hollow element. The second type is a
monopole over a ground plane, as illustrated
in figure 7(b). The monopole in this illustra-
tion uses a set of four wire elements to
provide the ground plane. Figure 8 shows a
typical pattern for a base-station monopole.
A variation of the dipole antenna is the
folded dipole as shown in figure 9. Its
radiation pattern is very similar to the simple
dipole, but its impedance is higher and it has
a wider bandwidth.

19
Figure 10. Typical mobile antennas
5.2.1 Mobile Applications
Nearly all vehicular antennas are monopoles
mounted over a (relatively) flat body surface
(as described above). In this application, the
monopole is often called a “whip” antenna.
At VHF low-band, a quarter-wave monopole
can be 2.5 m (approximately 8 ft) long.
However, an inductor (coil) at the base of a
monopole adds electrical length, so the
physical length of the antenna can be
shorter. Although this kind of “loaded”
antenna will appear to be a quarter-wave
antenna, it will have a gain value somewhat
less than a true quarter-wave monopole. This
disadvantage can be somewhat offset,
however, by the ability to mount the
(shorter) antenna in the center of a surface
that will act as an acceptable ground plane
(e.g., the roof or trunk of the vehicle).
Figure 10(a) shows an illustration of this
kind of antenna.
Many of the vehicular antennas at VHF
high-band are quarter-wave monopoles. At
150 MHz, this would mean that a whip
antenna, approximately 0.5 m (1.5 ft) long,
is needed. Half-wave and 5/8 wave
monopoles also are used, but they require
some sort of matching network (i.e.,
inductors and/or capacitors) in order to
match the antenna impedance to that of the
transmission line. These longer antennas
have a gain of approximately 3 dBi.
At UHF, a quarter-wave whip is
approximately 15 cm (6 in) long. Since this
length is physically small, some design
considerations can be used to increase the
gain. For example, as shown in figure 10(b),
two 5/8 wave monopoles can be “stacked”
with a phasing coil between them. This is,
effectively, an antenna array (see sec. 5.5)
that provides a gain of approximately 5 dBi.
At 800 MHz, a quarter-wave monopole does
not perform well, so the approach of
stacking two monopoles, with a phasing coil
between, is used. Such an antenna,
illustrated in figure 10(c), looks much like a
mobile cellular phone antenna and has a gain
of approximately 3 dBi.
The azimuthal pattern of all monopoles is
ideally a circle. In other words, the gain
versus azimuth angle in the horizontal plane
is constant. In practice, the pattern in the
horizontal plane generally is not
omnidirectional, since the portion of the
vehicle used as a ground plane is not
symmetric, and usually there are other
obstructions. Figure 11 shows the horizontal
plane pattern for an 840 MHz whip located
in the center of the roof of a vehicle [13].
The dotted line in the figure shows the
effects, on the pattern, of a law-enforcement
Figure 9. A folded-dipole antenna

20
Figure 11. A mobile antenna horizontal-
plane pattern [13]
Figure 12. Corner-reflector antennas
light bar mounted on the roof ahead of the
antenna.
5.3 Corner Reflector
An antenna comprised of one or more dipole
elements in front of a corner reflector, called
the corner-reflector antenna, is illustrated in
figure 12. A photograph of a typical corner
reflector is shown in figure 13.
This antenna has moderately high gain, but
its most important pattern feature is that the
forward (main beam) gain is much higher
than the gain in the opposite direction. This
is called the front-to-back ratio and is
evident in the pattern shown in figure 14.
5.4 Yagi
Another antenna design that uses passive
elements is the Yagi antenna. This antenna,
illustrated in figure 15, is inexpensive and
effective. It can be constructed with one or
Figure 13. A typical corner-reflector
antenna
Figure 14. A corner-reflector antenna
horizontal-plane pattern

21
Figure 15. The Yagi antenna —
(a) three elements and (b) multiple
elements
more (usually one or two) reflector elements
and one or more (usually two or more)
director elements. Figure 16 shows a Yagi
antenna with one reflector, a folded-dipole
active element, and seven directors, mounted
for horizontal polarization.
Figure 17 is a typical pattern for a three-
element (one reflector, one active element,
and one director) Yagi antenna. Generally,
the more elements a Yagi has, the higher the
gain, and the narrower the beamwidth. This
antenna can be mounted to support either
horizontal or vertical polarization and is
often used for point-to-point applications, as
between a base station and repeater-station
sites.
5.5 Log-Periodic
A somewhat novel, but very useful, design is
the log-periodic antenna. This antenna is
based on the dipole element. As shown in
the illustration of figure 18, it is in fact
comprised of a set of dipoles, all active, that
vary in size from smallest at the front to
largest at the rear. Usually, this antenna is
constructed so the antenna terminals are
located at the front (on the shortest dipole).
Figure 19 shows a typical installation. The
key features of this antenna are, first of all,
its broadband nature, and second, its
relatively high front-to-back gain ratio. The
latter feature is evident in the typical
radiation pattern shown in figure 20.
Figure 16. A typical Yagi antenna
Figure 17. A Yagi antenna horizontal-
plane pattern

22
Figure 18. A log-periodic antenna
Figure 19. A typical log-periodic antenna
Figure 20. A log-periodic antenna
horizontal-plane pattern
5.6 Arrays
An antenna array (or array antenna) is,
much like it sounds, several elements
interconnected and arranged in a regular
structure to form an individual antenna. The
purpose of an array is to produce radiation
patterns that have certain desirable
characteristics that a single element would
not. A stacked dipole array, as shown in
figure 21, is comprised of vertical dipole
elements.
This dipole array has an omnidirectional
pattern like the element dipole does; but has
higher gain and a narrower main lobe
beamwidth in the vertical plane. Figure 22
shows how the vertical-plane gain of the
dipole element can be “enhanced” by
making an array of them. Figure 22(a)
represents the radiation pattern of one
element. Figure 22(b) is the pattern of two
elements, and figure 22(c) is for three
elements.

23
Figure 21. A typical vertical array using
folded dipoles
Figure 22. Vertical-plane radiation
patterns for (a) single half-wave dipole,
(b) two-element array, and (c) three-
element array
This is called a binomial or collinear array
[14]. As the number of elements is
increased, the gain increases and the
beamwidth decreases.
The omnidirectional coaxial collinear
antenna (often referred to as an “omni”) is a
very popular array design for base stations. It
is comprised of quarter-wave coaxial
sections with inner and outer conductors
transposed at each junction.
A conceptual illustration is shown in
figure 23. Although more complex than the
illustration, this antenna array behaves like a
series of vertical dipoles stacked one above
the other. The more stacked sections, the
greater the gain and the narrower the vertical
beamwidth. A vertical-plane pattern for this
type of antenna is shown in figure 24.
Variations in electrical design can produce a
downward tilt of the vertical-plane pattern as
shown in figure 25. This antenna often is
enclosed in a fiberglass sheath, called a
radome, and appears as a simple pole that
can be mounted off the side or on top of a
mast or tower.

24
Figure 23. A coaxial collinear array
Figure 25. A vertical-plane radiation
pattern with 8/
/ “tilt”
As with all antennas, the array is frequency-
dependent. The gain, directivity, and
radiation pattern are each a function of
frequency. Some antennas will work well
only for the design frequency, and their
performance will degrade as the operating
frequency is separated from the design
frequency.
5.7 Unusual Antennas
There are many other antenna types. Most of
these are beyond the scope of this report, but
knowledge about some may be useful for
LMR users.
While not as commonplace as wire or rod
antennas, aperture antennas are by no means
unusual. These antennas are implemented as
an opening in a relatively large, conductive
(metal) surface.
The simplest aperture antenna is the slot
antenna, which is equivalent to a dipole. As
shown in figure 26, it is a long, narrow
opening with terminals located at the middle
of the long sides of the slot. This simple slot
and more complex versions are well-suited
to covert operations. They can be located on
a vehicle surface and concealed behind a
cover of thin insulating material. Slot
antennas are common on aircraft and
missiles.
Figure 24. A vertical-plane radiation
pattern without “tilt”

25
Figure 26. A slot antenna
Figure 27. A simple active antenna
Not so much antenna types as antenna
features, broadband and multiband antennas
are the result of design efforts to make an
antenna perform well over a wide band of
channels. There may be a trade-off in
making an antenna broadband, such as a
reduction in gain or an increase in physical
size. The usual design goals for this type of
antenna are to make the gain and radiation
pattern, as well as the terminal impedance,
relatively constant over the frequency range
of operation. The log-periodic array is an
example of a broadband antenna.
Multiband antennas are designed to operate
on several bands, for example, at both VHF
high-band and UHF. These antennas often
involve clever designs where one part of the
antenna is active for one band, and another
part for a different band. Again, there will be
compromises. The antenna may have lower
average gain or may be physically larger
than an equivalent single-band antenna.
5.8 Active Antennas
An active antenna is one that contains some
electronic circuitry that can amplify a
received signal at the antenna and thus avoid
interference that may enter the system at the
transmission line. Figure 27 shows this
concept. The antenna “element” is connected
to the input of an amplifier. The output
terminals of the amplifier are the antenna
terminals for this active antenna. The
antenna element and the amplifier are
included in the “active antenna,” shown as a
dashed box in the figure.
Another purpose of an active antenna is to
transform an unusual antenna terminal
impedance to a constant value that matches
the characteristic impedance of the
transmission line. This function is useful for
some antenna designs in which a specific
pattern feature is desired, but cannot be
achieved without causing the antenna to
have an unusual terminal impedance. An
active antenna is nonreciprocal and cannot
be used for transmitting.
5.9 Diversity Antennas
Diversity is a technique that improves
reception of radio waves by taking
advantage of the fact that signals that vary
with time (e.g., fading) are not the same at
separated locations. In other words, the

26
fading of a signal may be quite different for
two locations separated by as little as one
wavelength. To take advantage of this, two
antennas, separated by some distance, are
used to receive the same signal. Of the two
signals, the one with the highest signal level,
at any given time, is automatically sent to
the receiver. This process is only useful for
reception. The electronics required for this
kind of signal processing are sometimes part
of the antenna system.
Adaptive antennas extend the concept of
diversity another step further. These
antennas usually incorporate more than just
two elements (i.e., individual antennas) in
the array. An adaptive antenna can modify
its radiation pattern (within limits) in real
time to ensure that the main lobe points in
the direction of greatest signal level.
Alternatively (or, possibly, simultaneously),
the same technique can be used to point a
null in the direction of an unwanted,
interfering signal.

27
6. TRANSMISSION LINES AND OTHER COMPONENTS
Transmission lines are conduits for
transporting RF signals (and the energy
contained in those signals) between elements
of a communications system (fig. 1).
Transmission lines are not simply
conductors that carry electrical current like
the power cord for an electrical appliance
does. Transmission line principles, derived
from electromagnetic theory, must be used
when the line exceeds a few tenths of a
wavelength.
On a transmission line, not only do currents
flow within and on the surfaces of the
conductors, but traveling electromagnetic
fields are also “guided” by the conductors.
Therefore, the geometry of the transmission
line is fundamental to its electrical
characteristics.
6.1 Transmission Line Types
Figure 28 shows the arrangement of
conductors for several common types of
transmission lines. The open, two-wire line,
shown in figure 28(a), is easy to construct
and its characteristics are readily adjusted by
changing the diameter and spacing of the
wires. However, the electromagnetic field
created between and around the conductor
extends far beyond the line, so radiation
losses become excessive at high frequencies.
For this reason, it is only practical for use
below several hundred megahertz. This line
is also called “ribbon,” “parallel,” or “twin-
lead” cable and was used extensively, from
the 1950s to the 1970s, to connect a home
television set to its antenna.
The most common transmission line in use
today is coaxial cable, which gets its name
from the coaxial arrangement of its
conductors, as shown in figure 28(b). The
center conductor may be held in position
with periodically-spaced dielectric
(insulating) beads or with a continuous,
Figure 28. Common types of transmission lines

28
Figure 29. Coaxial cables commonly used
for LMR — (a) base-station applications
and (b) mobile applications
solid dielectric that fills the space between
the conductors. The outer conductor can be
either solid or braided; the latter making a
more flexible cable. The coaxial cable is
effectively self-shielded and has no external
fields. For this reason, its losses are low and
it is useful for frequencies as high as 3 GHz.
Since the outer conductor of a coaxial line is
usually grounded, it is not a balanced line. In
other words, both conductors are not equally
isolated from ground as is the case with the
open, two-wire line. This distinction is an
important factor at the connection to the
antenna. A balun (see sec. 6.2) may be
needed at that point to “match” the
unbalanced line to an antenna.
A very wide variety of coaxial cable (often
called “coax”) is available to meet different
requirements. Generally available in only
two values of characteristic
impedance—50 S and 75 S—coaxial cable
is made in many sizes of various materials.
Figure 29 shows two common coax types.
The cable shown in figure 29(a) has a semi-
rigid, helical outer conductor, so it is less
flexible. This cable is commonly used for
base-station applications. The cable shown
in figure 29(b) has a braided outer
conductor. This type of cable is commonly
used in mobile applications and for less-
demanding base-station applications.
Coaxial cable is described by nomenclature
derived from military standards [15]. The
“JAN type” or “RG-“ number assigned to a
coaxial cable defines specific values for a
wide range of physical and electrical
characteristics. Selected characteristics for a
few of the several hundred types of cables
are given in table 1. Not shown in this table
are other physical and electrical
characteristics such as weight, tensile
strength, materials used for the dielectric and
sheath, maximum voltage, and attenuation.
There are many other transmission line
geometries. The shielded pair, shown in
figure 28(c), is not uncommon. It offers the
fully shielded characteristic of a coaxial line
and the balanced nature of a two-wire,
parallel line.
6.2 Baluns
Since the outer conductor of a coaxial line is
grounded, it is not a balanced line. In other
words, the voltage potential difference
between the inner conductor and ground is
different from the voltage potential
difference between the outer conductor and
ground. This distinction is an important
factor at the connection to the antenna.
Antennas such as dipoles are balanced. A
balun will be needed at the antenna
terminals to connect the unbalanced coaxial
transmission line to the antenna.
A balun is a device for transforming a load
on an unbalanced transmission line (coaxial)
or system to a balanced line or system. The
name balun is a contraction of the terms
balanced and unbalanced.

29
Figure 30. A VHF duplexer
6.3 Duplexers
In order for transmitters and receivers to
share a single antenna, a duplexer must be
used. The duplexer acts as two parallel,
frequency selective filters, directing
transmitted signals to the antenna,
preventing those signals from reaching and
overloading collocated receivers, and
routing all of the received signals from the
antenna to the receivers. Duplexers used in
the VHF and UHF bands are typically
constructed from mechanically tunable,
highly selective cavity filters, as depicted in
figure 30.
Type
Impe-
dance
Inner
Conductor
Outer
Conductor
Diameter
Max.
Power
Notes
RG-58/U 50 S 19×0.0071 in
(19×0.018
cm) stranded
(tinned
copper)
braid
(tinned
copper)
0.195 in
(0.49 cm)
200 W small,
flexible, low
loss
RG-55/U 50 S 0.032 in
(0.08 cm)
solid
(silvered
copper)
double
braid
(silvered
copper)
0.206 in
(0.52 cm)
200 W small,
flexible, low
loss
RG-11/U 75 S 7× #26 AWG
(tinned
copper)
braid
(copper)
0.412 in
(1.05 cm)
750 W medium
sized,
flexible
Table 1. Characteristics of selected coaxial cable

30
Figure 31. Typical types of combiners —
(a) hybrid combiner and (b) cavity
combiner
Figure 32. Intermodulation suppression
device
6.4 Combiners
In order to combine more than one
transmitter onto one antenna system,
combiners are used. Two typical
configurations, shown in figure 31, use
either hybrid combiners (commonly called
hybrids), or mechanically tuned, highly
selective cavity combiners that use cavity
filters quite similar to those used in
duplexers. Depending on a number of
factors, such as how close in frequency the
transmitters are to one another and how
many transmitters must be combined, one
approach will offer superior performance
over the others. Vendors and manufacturers
should be able to explain why they selected
one combining method as opposed to the
other for their design.
6.5 Intermodulation Suppression
Cavities and hybrids will likely not provide
sufficient attenuation to RF signals (from
other collocated transmitters) that could
cause intermodulation interference. Isolators
are used to provide additional protection
against intermodulation interference. These
devices provide very low attenuation to
signals passing through them in one
direction, while providing a high degree of
attenuation to signals passing through them
in the other direction. They are the principal
components of intermodulation suppression
devices (fig. 32).
6.6 Multicouplers
Just as multiple transmitters can share an
antenna, so can multiple receivers. Inbound
RF signals are “split” and routed to the
appropriate receivers. Because RF splitters
attenuate the signals passed through them, a
preamplifier precedes the splitter. Its
amplifier gain is carefully adjusted to
compensate for the splitter loss, but is not
set too high, as the resultant intermodulation

31
Figure 33. A multicoupler
interference signals would be detrimental to
proper receiver performance. These
preamplifiers and signal splitters are
combined into a single assembly known as a
multicoupler (fig. 33).

33
(11)
7. RADIO WAVE PROPAGATION
The propagation of radio waves through
space (and the atmosphere) is the essential
phenomenon exploited by a radio
communications system. As described
earlier (sec. 3), this phenomenon has been
studied extensively using theoretical and
empirical methods. The simplest mode of
propagation occurs between two point-
sources in free space—the ideal situation.
Radio-wave propagation, in realistic
situations, is affected by reflections from the
earth, scattering by particles, diffraction over
hills, and bending due to atmospheric
refractivity. The study of propagation has led
to models that can be used to predict the
field strength (and/or power density)
expected at a specific receiver location of a
radio wave radiated from a distant
transmitter location.
7.1 Transmission Loss and the Power
Budget
The concept of transmission loss is used to
quantify the effects of radio wave
propagation in the analysis and engineering
of radio communications systems. It is
defined as the ratio of power delivered to the
terminals of the transmitter antenna to the
power available at the terminals of the
receiver antenna. The transmitter and
receiver antenna gains are implicitly
included in this definition. In practice, this is
not useful, so the concept of basic
transmission loss is used. It does not include
the antenna gains. Basic transmission loss Lb
is defined as the ratio of the power delivered
to a lossless isotropic antenna at the transmit
location to the power available at the
terminals of a lossless isotropic antenna at
the receive location.
With this definition of basic transmission
loss, a power budget can be developed. This
is shown graphically in figure 34, which
shows the effects of the major elements in
the radio link.
It begins with the power output of the
transmitter Pt in decibels relative to some
reference (if referenced to 1 W, this is
expressed as dBW). The loss, in decibels,
due to the transmitter transmission line Lt is
subtracted from Pt. Then the transmitter
antenna gain Gt is added. The basic
transmission loss Lb is subtracted. Then at
the receive end of the link, the receive gain
Gr is added; and the receiver transmission
line loss Lr is subtracted to arrive at the
power delivered to the receiver input Pr.
Expressed as an equation, the power budget
is
The received power is in the same units as
those used to express the transmitted power.
Figure 34. Gains and losses as described
in the power-budget equation

34
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
For example, a transmit power of 25 W,
expressed in decibels, would be 10 log10 (25)
or 14 dBW. The result is that the power
available at the receiver input Pr is expressed
in the same units (dBW in this example).
7.2 Free-Space Basic Transmission Loss
The transmission loss between two lossless
isotropic antennas in free space4
is a
hypothetical, but very useful, propagation
model. It can be used as a “first estimate” in
radio link design or a “best case” value for
transmission loss over any real, terrestrial
path.
The free-space basic transmission loss Lbf is
very easy to calculate. Since the transmit
antenna is considered to be a lossless
isotrope (and the transmission line is
considered to be lossless as well), all of the
transmitter power is radiated equally in all
directions. At a distance d selected to be
much greater than the wavelength 8, the
radiated power density (expressed in watts
per square meter) is simply the transmitter
power divided by the area of a sphere with
radius d, as follows:
Now, looking at the receive side of the link,
the signal power output Pr in watts, of a
lossless, isotropic receive antenna can be
computed using equation 9. It is the product
of that antenna’s effective area Ae times the
power density p of the incident wave as
follows,
Using equation 10, the effective area, in
square meters, of a lossless isotropic antenna
(g = 1) is
Substituting equations 12 and 14 into
equation 13, the result is
Rearranging this equation to form the
definition of Lbf as the ratio of Pt to Pr (see
sec. 7.1),
In decibels, this equation becomes,
By converting wavelength to frequency
using equation 1 and taking the logarithm of
the terms in parentheses, a very practical
version of this equation results.
where d is expressed in kilometers and f is
expressed in megahertz.
This last equation is the propagation model
for free-space, basic transmission loss. It
predicts a value of basic transmission loss
under a set of assumptions (i.e., lossless
4
Free space is a theoretical concept of space devoid of all matter.
In practice, free space implies remoteness from material objects
that could influence the propagation of electromagnetic waves.

35
(19)
(20)
isotropic antennas located in free space). As
an example of how to use this model and the
power-budget equation, consider a radio link
10 km long operating at 400 MHz. For this
link, assume that the transmit antenna has a
gain of 10 dB, the receive antenna has a gain
of 3 dB, and that both transmit and receive
transmission line losses are 1 dB. The
transmitter power is assumed to be 20 W
(13 dBW).
The basic free-space transmission loss is
first computed as
Then, using the power budget equation 11,
we find that
This result shows a receive power of about
one one-hundredth of a microwatt, or about
nine orders of magnitude less than the
transmit power. At this level, it is a strong
receive signal. An actual radio link, over
varied terrain, may have a larger measured
transmission loss by 5 dB to 20 dB. The
transmission loss over a realistic link will
also vary with time.
7.3 Terrestrial Propagation
A variety of natural and man-made objects
and phenomena will affect the radio signal
as it propagates from the transmitter to the
receiver. Some of these effects are described
in the following subsections. Although it is
important for the reader to be familiar with
these concepts, it is unnecessary for the
reader to determine the exact extent that
each effect affects the antenna system.
Several computer models are available that
provide relatively accurate propagation
predictions. Such models are described in
section 7.4.
7.3.1 Effects of Earth
The Earth acts as a reflecting surface for
those waves that radiate from an antenna at
angles lower than the horizon. Waves that
strike the Earth are reflected along the same
direction of travel, at the same angle as the
angle of incidence. The illustration in
figure 35 shows how waves propagate over
both direct and reflected paths to reach a
distant location.
The reflected waves combine with the direct
waves with a variety of results (i.e., they
enhance or cancel each other to some
degree). Some of the factors that cause this
variety are the height of the antenna, the
orientation of the antenna, the length of the
antenna, and the characteristics of the
ground reflecting the wave. As part of the
wave strikes the ground and reflects
forward, that part of the wave will take a
slightly longer time to arrive at the receiver.
Figure 35. A propagation path illustrating
direct and reflected rays

36
At some reflection angles, the direct wave
and reflected wave will arrive almost in
phase (i.e., the amplitude of each wave will
be at its maximum at the same time). When
this happens, the power of the received wave
is approximately twice that of the direct
wave. At some angles, the reflected wave is
exactly out of phase with the direct wave,
essentially nullifying the wave. This is
known as cancellation. At other angles, the
resultant wave will be somewhere in
between.
As radio waves strike a radio-opaque object,
some of the signal will be reflected in
directions away from the receiver. Some of
the signal will be absorbed by the object.
The waves that strike the edges of the object,
however, will be diffracted into the shadow
of the object. To a receiver positioned within
such a shadow, the object’s edge will seem
like another source. This can cause
interference with the original signal or
provide signals to areas that should not
receive them. This phenomenon is shown in
figure 36.
7.3.2 Coverage
The area over which the signal can be
detected is called the coverage area for the
antenna. The coverage area is often
displayed as contours on a two-dimensional
drawing or on a map.
A radiation pattern is not the same thing as a
coverage area, although they are related. The
radiation pattern for an antenna is a gain
factor, in every direction away from the
antenna, and is a function only of the
antenna design.
The coverage area for an antenna is the area
over which a signal, of predetermined
strength (or greater), can be received. The
coverage area is a function of the transmit
power, antenna gain, radiation pattern, noise,
and propagation factors related to the
environment.
7.3.3 Noise and Interference
All things emit some radiation at all
frequencies. In most cases, for most objects,
the level of this continuous radiation, at any
given frequency, is small and of little
concern. This radiation is called noise. The
most common sources of noise for a radio
receiver are:
• Atmospheric and galactic noise.
• Noise from the first amplifier in the
receiver.
• Man-made noise (motors, flourescent
lights, etc.).
When a radio receiver is far enough away
from a transmitter (or in an antenna pattern
null where reception is difficult), the
strength of the transmitted signal is low
enough that ambient radiation noise from
other objects or transmissions in the area
Figure 36. An example of diffraction

37
can obscure the desired signal. When the
strength of a received signal is less than the
strength of the ambient noise for that
frequency, the signal is said to be “lost in the
noise.”
Ambient noise for a specific transmission is
usually measured at the transmission
frequency.
Interference is the term for unwanted
signals, generated from other transmitters,
that interfere with clear reception of the
intended signal. Interference is not
technically included under the definition of
noise, although slang usage of the term
“noise” includes any unwanted signals.
7.3.4 Terrestrial Propagation Models
Radio-wave propagation in the terrestrial
environment is an enigmatic phenomenon
whose properties are difficult to predict.
This is particularly true for LMR
applications where terrain features (hills,
trees, buildings, etc.) and the ever-changing
atmosphere provide scattering, reflection,
refraction, and diffraction obstacles with
dimensions of the same order of magnitude
as the wavelengths.
Some models are general and some are more
specialized. An example of the former is a
model that would predict radio coverage
areas in “generic” urban areas or “generic”
rural areas, without regard to specific terrain
profiles. One of these generalized models is
the Okumura-Hata model [16]. Models such
as the Okumura-Hata model are based on
extensive collections of empirical
measurements.
Other more sophisticated computer
programs predict transmission loss, and
account for the time and location variability
of that loss, over defined terrain profiles.
These terrain profiles are compiled from
terrain-elevation data tabulated by agencies
such as the Defense Mapping Agency and
the U.S. Geological Survey. One such
computer program, written and maintained
by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s
Institute for Telecommunication Sciences
(ITS), is the Communication Systems
Performance Model (CSPM) [17]. This
program is based on the ITS Irregular
Terrain Model [18].
Usually, manufacturers and vendors of radio
and antenna systems and components have
computer programs similar to CSPM to
assist customers in defining radio-coverage
areas. Private-industry radio-engineering
consultants also have computer programs
like CSPM to perform radio-coverage
analysis for customers. Alternatively,
agencies can access CSPM on a
fee-reimbursable basis through the ITS
Internet site5
.
7.4 Co-Site Analysis
Intermodulation (IM) interference (i.e.,
“intermod”) and receiver desensitization are
detrimental to the performance of co-sited
repeaters and base stations. There are several
different ways intermod interference can be
generated. One way is when sufficiently
large power from a transmitter enters into
the final output power stage of another
transmitter. This may occur when, for
example, the transmitters are connected to a
combiner junction and the combining
cavity/isolators of the affected transmitter do
5
http://flattop.its.bldrdoc.gov/tas.html.
For additional information, contact the Institute for
Telecommunication Sciences at 325 Broadway (ITS.E), Boulder,
Colorado 80305–3328, Telephone 303–497–5301.

38
not provide sufficient rejection between
transmitters.
Intermodulation may also arise when several
transmitting antennas are located in very
close proximity to each other, such as
multiple omni-directional antennas on a
building rooftop. In these situations, mixing
of signals may occur between the offending
transmitter(s) and the desired signal, thereby
generating new signals in the victim
transmitter, at frequencies determined by the
intermod products. These intermod signals
will be emitted by the victim transmitter.
Other ways that intermod can occur are by
the mixing of signals from two or more
transmitters in the front-end of a receiver.
Off-frequency signals strong enough to
overcome the suppression of bandpass
cavities and preselector filters may saturate
the nonlinear first or second intermediate
frequency (IF) mixers of the victim receiver,
creating intermod products which adversely
affect receiver performance.
External intermod can also be created in
elements such as corroded antenna guy
wires, anchor rods, and even chain link
fences. As strong signals impinge upon these
items, the corroded objects act as diodes and
detect the signals, mix them, and passively
reradiate the energy at the intermod product
frequencies.

39
8. ANTENNA SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AND DESIGN
The selection of a particular antenna system
for use in a radio communications system is
one of many interrelated decisions that must
be made to meet the system-level
requirements for a complete LMR system.
Other system-level decisions include the
number and locations of base and repeater
stations, the antenna heights, and the
transmitter powers.
Selecting the appropriate antennas for
vehicular and hand-held units is a much
simpler process than selecting the
appropriate antennas for fixed stations.
Although there are exceptions, the whip
antenna is, essentially, the only practical
antenna design for vehicular and hand-held
radios. The most important aspect for
vehicular antennas has to do with where it is
mounted on the vehicle. The best location
for vehicular antennas is in the middle of the
roof. This is the highest point and presents
the flattest and most symmetric ground plane
to the antenna, both important factors to
optimize communications range and
performance. Vehicular obstructions, such
as the light bar on law enforcement vehicles,
will, however, distort the radiation pattern
and/or alter the antenna’s terminal
impedance slightly.
Bumper mount installations for low-band
VHF, for example, may be selected based
more on the antenna installation structural
rigidity requirements than on ground plane
symmetry, radiation pattern distortion, and
other RF performance parameters.
Choices for hand-held radio antennas are, in
practice, limited to short whip antennas.
These antennas are physically very short, are
typically inductively or resistively loaded (to
simulate, electrically, a longer antenna
and/or to provide a better impedance match).
These features and attributes are
accomplished at the cost of decreased
antenna gain.
Selecting appropriate antennas for fixed
stations is more critical than selecting the
antennas for mobile and hand-held units.
This is because antennas for fixed stations
must be chosen to adequately receive signals
from the least-capable mobile/hand-held
units (those with low transmitter power, low
antenna gain, low antenna height, etc.).
When designing a radio system for LMR
use, a systematic development plan must be
created and followed:
• Define System Requirements.
• Design System.
• Select Appropriate Components.
• Procure and Install Components.
• Perform Routine Maintenance.
Each of these steps is dependent on the
previous step in the chain.
8.1 Define System Requirements
The design and deployment of an LMR
communications system, or the upgrade or
expansion of an existing system, generally
begins with some knowledge of what
geographic regions need to be “covered” by
the radio communications system. This is a
fundamental requirement that is determined
by the nature of an agency’s jurisdiction,
where population and transportation routes
are located, and so on. These requirements
must be developed by the agency itself.

40
Several other system-level requirements can
also be developed by the agency before
obtaining the services of a radio system
vendor or consultant. Larger law
enforcement agencies will have a
communications department that will
perform these services. The number of
mobile and handheld units, for example, is
usually determined by the number of users
that must be supported.
Next, some decisions must be made
regarding how many channels will be
needed. For example, one or more channels
may be needed for dispatch functions.
Additional channels may be needed for
mobile-to-mobile communications. Other
channels that might be needed could
include:
• A local command channel for
operations at an event site.
• A channel to interoperate with other
agencies in mutual-aid situations.
• A channel dedicated to tactical forces.
• Other channels to support the
operational and administrative
activities of the agency.
Other aspects that may affect system design
include:
• The typical length of messages for the
various channels and talk groups.
• Maximum level of activity for the
dispatch channel.
• The nature of operations that use the
local command channel.
• Geographic coverage requirements.
• The specific level of performance (i.e.,
speech intelligibility and/or data-
transmission throughput) required.
Having a working knowledge of these
system-level requirements will help ensure
efficiency in the system design process that
follows, and will help ensure the reliable
performance of the system when it is fully
deployed.
Begin by developing some initial system
requirements. Consider, for example, the
following:
• At what frequencies will you be
transmitting? Lower frequencies
require larger antennas. Higher
frequencies have more limited range.
A wide range of frequencies will
require multiple antennas, multiband
antennas, or broadband antennas.
• What is the maximum distance over
which your users must communicate?
Systems to support distant itinerant
users will require a combination of
higher-power transmitters and
antennas with greater gain.
• What is your coverage area? Required
antenna radiation patterns will be
dictated by the location of the fixed
site relative to the required coverage
area.
• Are there other nearby radio systems
operating in neighboring frequency
bands or on the same or adjacent
frequency channels? Your system
might cause interference to these other
users, or conversely, these systems
might cause interference to your new
system.
• What physical limits are there on your
design? Is there sufficient property to
construct a site, or is there sufficient
space on shared antenna towers for
your system? Will building code and
zoning ordinances impact the
construction of your system?

41
• What about standby/back-up systems
at this site or at another antenna site?
• What level of speech intelligibility is
required? How much noise and
distortion can be tolerated? For data
transmissions, what data-throughput
rates are required (how large is the
data file and how much time is
available for transmission)?
8.2 Design System
The decisions that must be made during the
design of a new system or the expansion of
an existing system include:
• The number of base and repeater
stations and their locations.
• Some initial choices of antennas and
antenna heights for those fixed sites.
The design process will require the
identification of:
• The availability of channels in the
various LMR frequency bands.
• Potential/alternative base and repeater
station locations.
• The potential for sharing fixed-station
infrastructure among multiple
agencies.
• The estimated cost of the system.
8.3 Select Appropriate Components
Once the system performance and system
design requirements have been ascertained,
the antenna characteristics that must be
considered are the antenna system gain and
radiation pattern. The process of identifying
the needed gain and pattern is usually an
iterative one. The process might proceed as
follows:
First, coverage predictions are made. Values
for transmitter power, operating frequency,
antenna system losses, antenna gain, antenna
height, antenna pattern, and minimum
acceptable received signal strength for some
specified level of speech intelligibility are
required in order to make these coverage
predictions.
Intermodulation interference analysis must
also be considered during the design phase,
particularly where multiple transmitters,
receivers, and/or repeaters are collocated.
Antenna system manufacturers and vendors
can assist agencies in predicting the
likelihood of IM interference or receiver
desensitization, either caused by or inflicted
upon the proposed new system. To mitigate
IM interference at repeater and base station
antenna sites, their designs will include
isolators, cavity filters, duplexers,
combiners, and multicouplers. The number
of collocated systems and the frequency
separations between them also influences the
choice of combiner and duplexer
components.
System design and component selection
continue by interactively trying different
antenna gains, patterns, and heights at each
potential site location until the desired
coverage is attained. Then, antenna system
installation at each fixed site needs to be
considered. Points to consider include:
• Antenna tower height—Will the
proposed antenna tower conform to
local building codes and zoning
ordinances?
• Environmental considerations—Will
the antenna system and supporting
structure survive expected wind
loading, ice loading, and other
anticipated environmental

42
performance factors? EIA/TIA
Standard 329-B [19], EIA/TIA
Standard 329-B(1) [20], NIJ Standard-
0204.02 [21], and
NIJ Standard-0205.02 [22] all provide
guidance regarding the minimum
environmental, as well as RF,
performance criteria required of all
antennas used in the law enforcement
and corrections arenas.
• Security—Is the site secure against
unauthorized intrusions, yet accessible
to maintenance personnel?
• Accessibility—Could inclement
weather (i.e., deep snow drifts,
washed-out dirt access roads) prevent
maintenance personnel from reaching
the site?
• Co-site analysis and IM
interference—Will retrofitting new
systems into existing infrastructures
introduce adjacent-channel
interference, co-channel interference,
IM interference, or receiver
desensitization upon other existing
systems or upon the new system? Will
other nearby users and systems
detrimentally affect the performance
of the new system because of these
problems? How will the vendor
mitigate predicted interference
problems? Does the vendor have a
plan to mitigate unforeseen
interference problems?
• Power source—Is commercial
electrical power available? Will
solar/battery power be required as
primary/backup power?
• Wireline/wireless link—Is telephone
service available? Is fiber optics
service available? Will microwave
radio be required?

43
9. INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND SAFETY
9.1 Vehicular Antenna Systems
The procurement and installation of
vehicular antenna systems are relatively
straightforward. If the design requirements
have been well thought out and adequately
described in the procurement documents, a
competitive procurement will deliver an
acceptable product.
When installing a vehicular antenna system,
care must be given to routing the coaxial
cable between the radio and antenna. The
cable should not be exposed to the elements
(wind, road salt and sand, rain, intense
sunlight, extreme heat, etc.) nor should it be
in a location where it could be severed or
pinched (by opening and closing vehicle
doors, for example) or where a vehicle’s
occupants might become entangled with it.
One preferred routing for a roof-mounted
antenna might be between the roof and
interior headliner of the vehicle, down
through a windshield pillar, and behind the
dashboard panel to the radio. Other
equipment, such as duplexers (to combine
multiple radios operating in different
frequency bands onto one multiband
antenna), should likewise be installed in
locations not readily accessible to vehicle
occupants. For example, they should be
installed under seats or in trunks where they
are “out of the way,” yet reasonably
accessible to maintenance personnel.
RF cable connections should be torqued to
the proper force recommended for the
particular connectors used, and the outer
grounded conductor of the antenna base
mount must be RF-bonded to the metal of
the roof or trunk deck. Trunk deck
installations also require excellent RF
bonding from the trunk lid to the main
vehicle body. One way to accomplish this is
by using a short length of low-impedance
copper grounding strap affixed to bare areas
of (interior) sheet metal on the underside of
the trunk deck and the main vehicle body,
using noncorrosive bolts, star washers, and
lock nuts. A poor ground connection will
detrimentally affect antenna operation,
resulting in erratic or unacceptable
performance.
9.2 Fixed-Site Antenna Systems
Most new installations of fixed-repeater and
base-station antenna systems will likely be
performed by contracted installers or
equipment suppliers. In many cases,
retrofitting new or upgraded components
into existing facilities will similarly be
performed by contracted installers or
equipment suppliers. Procuring agencies
should, nevertheless, ensure that the installer
observes sound installation practices. As
with vehicular grounding, proper ground
protection of fixed station antenna facilities
is important.
9.2.1 Fixed-Site Antenna System
Grounding and Bonding Practices
An effective grounding system is necessary
for every antenna tower. In addition to the
protection a grounding system offers from
lightning strikes, grounding also:
• Reduces the hazards of electrical
shock resulting from ground/neutral
power faults.
• Protects wiring and circuitry by
limiting extraneous over-voltages.

44
• Facilitates rapid discharge of faulted
power circuits.
• Reduces noise voltages.
• Provides a path to dissipate any stray
RF current present inside the
transmitter station; ungrounded RF
currents can contribute to equipment
malfunction, or create interference
with other receivers.
9.2.2 Fixed-Station RF Bonding
RF bonding is another important aspect of
fixed-station antenna systems. Simply
connecting each element of a transmitter
facility to a metal pipe stuck in the ground is
barely adequate to act as a grounding
system. The components of such a
grounding system are not perfect conductors
and each will have different, finite values for
resistance. The resistance and physical
design of the grounding system adds to the
overall resistance and reactance of the
antenna system and transmission line,
causing the system to have different voltage
potentials at different points within the
system, inducing stray currents to flow
between equipment chassis. These stray
currents can affect internal circuits of the
equipment and cause erratic operation and
unpredictable behavior.
A bonding system ensures that all equipment
grounding points are at the same electrical
potential. A good dc and RF bonding system
will use high-quality, low-impedance copper
strap or braid and attach all equipment
chassis to a low-impedance copper bus strap
installed on the walls throughout the station
facilities. The copper bus leaves the station
and is attached to the Earth using a copper
ground rod approximately 3 m long. The
point of egress for the facility ground should
be at the same entry point as RF cable,
telephone, and power connections.
9.3 Lightning Protection
The National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) publishes a guideline related to
lightning protection [23]. This guideline
details many additional practices for
protecting radio equipment from lightning
strikes.
Metal antennas and towers should be
connected to the building’s lightning
protection system. Wires and metallic
elements comprising an antenna tower’s
lightning protection system should be
electrically attached to the Earth. Towers
and guy wires anchored to concrete forms in
the ground are often assumed to be well
grounded, but concrete is a poor electrical
conductor. Tower legs should be electrically
attached to the Earth with a copper ground
stake approximately 3 m long. Lightning-
ground connecting leads connecting the
tower to the ground stake should be at least
AWG #10 copper, AWG #8 aluminum, or
3/4 in copper braid.
The transmission lines must be protected by
lightning arresters, protectors, and discharge
units. Arresters can be placed at both ends of
the transmission line for added protection.
9.4 During Installation
Be sure the installer knows exactly where on
the vehicle or on the antenna tower the
antenna components are to be installed.
Make sure they are installed in the correct
orientation and positioned correctly.
Make sure that the ends of the transmission
line cable have been prepared properly
before affixing RF connectors to the

45
transmission line. Make sure that the RF
connectors are properly installed on the
transmission line. Loose connector
assemblies will result in poor ground
connections between the outer connector
shell and the outer shield of the transmission
line. Make sure that the center pin is
securely affixed to the center conductor of
the coaxial transmission line and that the
center pin’s depth, relative to the connector
shell, is maintained at the correct distance,
or an impedance mismatch or connector
damage will result. Make sure that the
antenna and transmission line connectors
will mate properly before connection to
other equipment is attempted. Connectors
can be easily misaligned or over- or under-
torqued, resulting in degraded or erratic
overall RF performance. Make sure that the
transmission line has not been damaged in
any way, such as crushed, severed, or
pinched.
Check the VSWR as soon as possible after
installation, and, if possible, before the
installer leaves the job site. In addition to
VSWR measurements, time-domain
reflectometry (TDR), line-fault
measurements are helpful. Use a portable
transmitting unit if the radio transmitter is
not yet installed. Record the VSWR values
and TDR data for future reference.
Measure and record the ambient noise power
levels for future reference.
If possible, the installer should conduct
“over-the-air” RF power sensitivity
measurements immediately after installation,
and document the test configuration and
measurement results for future reference.
For example, a portable antenna mast, 7 m
to 10 m high, could be placed at a geological
survey marker that has unobstructed, clear,
visual line-of-sight to the repeater or base
station-antenna tower. A portable transmitter
could serve as the signal source. A similar
method could be used to measure the power
received by a portable radio service monitor
(such as an IFR1500 or Motorola R-2670)
located at the survey-marker point.
Make a physical inspection of the
installation. Be sure all connectors and
transmission lines are secured properly.
9.5 Perform Routine Maintenance
After a vehicular or repeater/base-station
antenna system has been installed, the
system will require periodic maintenance to
ensure optimum performance.
Agencies should practice three tiers of
maintenance. The first is performed by the
radio operators and consists of simple,
“common-sense” inspection of the
equipment. The second level of maintenance
is performed by site technicians and requires
the use of land mobile radio test equipment.
The third level of maintenance is performed
by factory-authorized technicians.
9.5.1 Local Inspection
Radio operators themselves can perform a
wide variety of simple aural and visual
inspections of their radio equipment and
antennas. For instance:
• Isolated problems noted with reception
or transmission in the field. Direct
comparison between two radios
(“I cannot hear the base station when I
am in this location.” “Oh, really? I can
hear the base station okay.”) gives an
excellent indication of a problem with
a subscriber unit.

46
• Loose or missing connectors—Over
time, temperature variations, shock,
vibration, exposure to the elements,
and handling can cause connections
and connector flanges to become loose
or missing altogether. Rubber O-ring
grommet seals may deteriorate,
allowing moisture to penetrate into
connectors or the transmission line,
altering their performance.
• Cracked or broken whip antenna base-
loading coils—Cracks in the plastic
housing of vehicular antenna base-
loading coils can permit moisture and
corrosive materials to penetrate into
the loading coil, altering the antenna’s
electrical performance. Weathering of
rubber grommet O-ring seals (where
the loading coil is affixed to the roof
or trunk deck of the vehicle) may
similarly permit moisture and
corrosive materials to penetrate into
the connector between the loading coil
and its attachment to the coaxial cable
connector, altering the antenna’s
electrical performance.
9.5.2 Site Technician
The site technician will often have an array
of RF test equipment at his or her disposal.
For example, a communications service
monitor can determine whether a radio is
transmitting on the proper frequency, at the
proper power level, with the proper
frequency bandwidth. A VSWR meter gives
an indication of how well RF energy is
coupled from the radio system into the
antenna. A time-domain reflectometer can
determine where faults or other
discontinuities exist along the length of a
transmission line. Portable field strength
meters can give an indication as to whether
the antenna radiates electromagnetic energy
as expected.
Vehicular antenna systems should be
periodically checked according to an
established maintenance schedule, typically
concurrent with the maintenance schedule of
the mobile radio (perhaps once or twice per
year). Performance values such as VSWR
should be recorded, compared to the
performance values measured just after
installation, and tracked over time in order
to assist in keeping the antenna system
functioning at an optimal performance level.
The above statements apply equally to fixed-
site repeaters and base stations.
Unfortunately, whereas problems with
mobile and portable radio systems can be
readily identified by direct performance
comparison at the operator level, such is not
necessarily the case for fixed sites. Because
performance degradation at the fixed site
affects all subscriber units equally, slowly
occurring degradation in performance,
caused by corrosion effects, weathering, etc.,
may go unnoticed for years until
catastrophic failure finally occurs.
Therefore, regularly scheduled site visits to
conduct maintenance performance
inspections must be a part of the site
technician’s routine. Recording a time
history of the RF performance, and
comparing it to the RF performance
measured immediately following the
repeater or base-station installation, will be
an invaluable maintenance aid.
Remote automated in-line diagnostic test
equipment can also provide indications of
needed maintenance. Several vendors of
antenna system equipment, such as Bird
Electronic Corp., Decibel Products, Sinclair
Technologies, Telewave, and many others,

47
manufacture remote in-line diagnostic
measurement equipment. This equipment
can report the health and status of a fixed
repeater/base-station site’s RF performance,
up to the point where the radio wave is
launched into space. For example,
conditions of low transmitter power and/or
excessive VSWR, which might result from
detuned combiner cavities or duplexers,
failing radios, weathering of components,
etc., can be sensed by the automated
diagnostic equipment. Alarm conditions can
automatically be reported to a computer by
preconfigured telephone dial-up to the
centralized maintenance facility.
9.5.3 Factory-Authorized Technicians
If an antenna system or radio problem is too
complicated for the local site technician to
repair, the manufacturer should be
contacted. Many large public safety
organizations have service contracts with
factory-authorized repair facilities to
maintain, repair, and replace equipment.
Even without a contract, contacting the
manufacturer about specific problems is
advised if the problems are beyond the
abilities of the agency to repair.
9.5.4 Antenna Tower Safety
Working on antenna towers can be
dangerous and potentially fatal. Serious
personal injury and equipment damage can
result from personnel falling, improperly
installed equipment, and RF radiation
exposure.
When maintenance personnel must work on
antenna towers, safety equipment should be
selected, used, and cared for as if their lives
depend on it—because they do! A list of
safety equipment should include:
• Safety belt.
• Safety glasses.
• Work boots with firm, nonslip soles
and well-defined heels.
• Hard hat.
It is recommended that antenna tower
installations have a personnel fall-arrester
system. These systems permit maintenance
personnel to attach their safety belts at
ground level, and remain attached during
tower ascent and descent, as well as while
working at height. Antenna tower
manufacturers, such as Rohn Tower, offer
fall arrester systems, which comply with
OSHA regulations.
In addition to personnel safety while
ascending, working on, or descending
antenna towers, maintenance personnel must
be cognizant to the danger of RF electrical
burns arising from direct contact with
energized antenna elements, and to exposure
to high levels of RF radiation. Industry
standards have been developed that specify
the levels of electromagnetic exposure to
which personnel can be “safely” exposed
[24]. Personnel working on transmitting
antenna towers must ensure that all antennas
that they are working on or near are
disconnected from their associated
transmitters, and that the transmitters are
routed into dummy loads (to prevent damage
to the transmitter final amplifier in the event
of inadvertent transmissions), or that some
sort of fail-safe mechanism for
disconnecting power to those transmitters
has been engaged.
Lastly, maintenance personnel should be
alert to weather conditions. It is ill-advised
to work on an antenna tower during an
electrical storm or in high winds.
Remember—safety first!

48
9.5.5 Vehicular Antenna Systems
The same precautions regarding RF
exposure on antenna towers should be
observed when operating or performing
maintenance on vehicular antenna systems.
For example, personnel should not stand
outside and next to their vehicle (where they
do not have the benefit of RF shielding
afforded by the vehicle’s roof that they
would have if they were inside the passenger
compartment of the vehicle) while operating
a 45 W (or greater) mobile radio transmitter,
nor should they touch the antenna when
transmitting.
9.5.6 The Importance of Maintaining
Your Radio System
It must be stressed that regularly scheduled,
periodic testing and preventive maintenance
of the entire radio system is of paramount
importance. Motor vehicles used by law
enforcement and corrections, fire,
emergency medical services, and other
public-safety agencies are maintained by
complying with strict maintenance
schedules. Weapons are maintained by
following regular preventive maintenance
schedules of cleaning, lubrication, and
inspection for worn or damaged parts. The
same must hold true for all parts of a radio
communications system—the lives of fire,
emergency medical services, and law
enforcement and corrections personnel may
depend on it.

49
10. ANTENNA SYSTEM RESOURCES
This section describes some of the resources
available to agencies to research information
about and identify pertinent products,
antenna systems and related components.
There are many qualified and conscientious
manufacturers and products available; only a
few are cited herein in order to provide a
sampling of what is available.
10.1 Internet Resources
As the World Wide Web (WWW or Web)
has grown in recent years, many antenna
manufacturers and suppliers have created
Web pages devoted to their products.
Most Web-page authors will register their
page with one or more of the major “search
engines” on the Web. A search engine is a
program that will use a search phrase
provided by a user (usually a single word or
simple phrase) to search hundreds of
thousands of Web pages looking for
occurrences of the phrase. The engine will
then return a list of those Web pages that
most closely match the search criteria (i.e.,
those that contain the search phrase). A few
search engines, such as Metacrawler
(http://www.metacrawler.com) conduct
searches by simultaneously querying more
than one search engine.
10.2 Periodicals
Several periodicals are written for the land
mobile radio industry. Most are free to
“qualified” subscribers. These periodicals
contain articles of technical interest related
to land mobile radio, and advertisements for
land mobile radio systems, components, and
services. These periodicals publish, as
special issues, buyers’ guides on an annual
or biannual basis. One such periodical that
does this is Mobile Radio Technology (URL:
http://mrtmag.com, telephone
1–913–341–1300). Another is APCO’s
monthly APCO Bulletin (URL:
http://www.apcointl.org/bulletin/, telephone
1–888–APCO–911). Public libraries may
maintain subscriptions to this and other
LMR-related periodicals, or they may be
able to obtain issues under interlibrary loan
agreements.
10.3 Manufacturers’ and Vendors’
Catalogs
Most antenna manufacturers and vendors
distribute free catalogs that describe
antennas, transmission lines, and related
components that they offer for sale. Most
catalogs provide useful technical
information such as antenna patterns,
operating frequencies, physical dimensions,
and costs. Frequently, these catalogs will
provide basic explanations about various
aspects of antenna systems, such as
collocated transmitter-combining
techniques, intermodulation interference,
transmission line theory, etc.
Many manufacturers have more than one
product line, e.g., antennas and duplexers.
Information about manufacturers’ offerings
can be identified and researched via the
Internet or through the periodicals and
buyers' guides discussed in the previous two
subsections.

51
11. PROFESSIONAL AND STANDARDS ORGANIZATIONS
The following subsections describe some of the various organizations that create and maintain
antenna and radio standards or are otherwise of interest to the law enforcement or corrections
officials interested in learning about antennas.
Most of the descriptive text in these subsections is taken directly from the Web site listed for
each subsection and edited slightly for format or clarity.
1–800–248–2742 http://www.nlectc.org/
The Justice Technology Information Network (JUSTNET) was created in 1995 at the National
Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (NLECTC) National Center in Rockville,
MD, and serves as a gateway to the products and services of the NLECTC System as well as
other technology information and services of interest to the law enforcement and corrections
communities. JUSTNET is a central element of the National Institute of Justice Office of Science
and Technology's information collection and dissemination mission. Through JUSTNET, users
have access to interactive bulletin boards on a variety of topics, a comprehensive database of law
enforcement products and technologies, and NLECTC publications.
1–606–244–8182 http://www.nastd.org
The National Association of State Telecommunications Directors (NASTD) is a member-driven
organization whose purpose is to advance and promote the effective use of telecommunications
technology and services to improve the operation of State government.
NASTD members represent telecommunications professionals from the 50 States, the District of
Columbia, the U.S. territories, and the private sector. State members are responsible for the
provision and management of State government communications facilities and systems for State
agencies and other public entities including hospitals, prisons, colleges, and universities. These
members also play a strategic role in planning and shaping their States’ telecommunications
infrastructures and policies. Corporate members represent companies that provide
telecommunications technology services and equipment to State government.

52
NASTD was founded in 1978 and has been an affiliate of the Council of State Governments
(CSG) since 1980, with its headquarters in Lexington, KY.
1–888–APCO–911 http://www.apcointl.org/
The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials International, Inc. (APCO
International), is the world's oldest and largest not-for-profit professional organization dedicated
to the enhancement of public safety communications.
With more than 13 000 members around the world, APCO International exists to serve the
people who manage, operate, maintain, and supply the communications systems used to
safeguard the lives and property of citizens everywhere.
APCO members come from many public safety organizations, including:
• Law Enforcement Agencies.
• Emergency Medical Services.
• Fire Departments.
• Public Safety Departments.
• Colleges and Universities.
• Military Units.
• Manufacturers.
APCO's mission is to:
• Foster the development and progress of the art of public safety communications by means
of research, planning, training, and education.
• Promote cooperation between towns, cities, counties, States, and Federal public safety
agencies in the area of communications.
• Represent its members before communications regulatory agencies and policy making
bodies as may be appropriate.
• Through its efforts strive toward the end that the safety of human life, the protection of
property, and the civic welfare are benefitted to the utmost degree.
• Aid and assist in the rapid and accurate collection, exchange, and dissemination of
information relating to emergencies and other vital public safety functions.

53
1–212–642–4900 http://web.ansi.org/
The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) has served in its capacity as administrator and
coordinator of the United States private sector voluntary standardization system for 80 years.
Founded in 1918 by five engineering societies and three government agencies, the Institute
remains a private, nonprofit membership organization supported by a diverse constituency of
private and public sector organizations.
Throughout its history, the ANSI Federation has maintained as its primary goal the enhancement
of global competitiveness of U.S. business and the American quality of life by promoting and
facilitating voluntary consensus standards and conformity assessment systems and promoting
their integrity. The Institute represents the interests of its nearly 1 000 company, organization,
government agency, institutional, and international members through its office in New York
City, and its headquarters in Washington, DC.
ANSI does not develop American National Standards (ANSs); rather, it facilitates development
by establishing consensus among qualified groups. The Institute ensures that its guiding
principles—consensus, due process, and openness—are followed by the more than 175 distinct
entities currently accredited under one of the Federation’s three methods of accreditation
(organization, committee, or canvass). In 1999 alone, the number of American National
Standards increased by nearly 5.5 % to a new total of 14 650. ANSI-accredited developers are
committed to supporting the development of national and, in many cases, international standards,
addressing the critical trends of technological innovation, marketplace globalization, and
regulatory reform.

54
1–800–678–IEEE http://www.ieee.org/
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) is the world's largest technical
professional society. Founded in 1884 by a handful of practitioners of the new electrical
engineering discipline, today's Institute is comprised of more than 320 000 members who
conduct and participate in its activities in 152 countries. The men and women of the IEEE are the
technical and scientific professionals making the revolutionary engineering advances that are
reshaping our world today.
The technical objectives of the IEEE focus on advancing the theory and practice of electrical,
electronics, and computer engineering, and computer science. To realize these objectives, the
IEEE sponsors technical conferences, symposia and local meetings worldwide: publishes nearly
25 % of the world's technical papers in electrical, electronics, and computer engineering;
provides educational programs to keep its members' knowledge and expertise state-of-the-art.
The purpose of all these activities is twofold: (1) to enhance the quality of life for all peoples
through improved public awareness of the influences and applications of its technologies; and (2)
to advance the standing of the engineering profession and its members.
The IEEE, through its members, provides leadership in areas ranging from aerospace, computers,
and communications to biomedical technology, electric power, and consumer electronics. For the
latest research and innovations in the many diverse fields of electrical and electronics
engineering, industry and individuals look to the IEEE.
1–703–907–7500 http://www.eia.org/
For more than 70 years, the Electronics Industry Alliance (EIA) has been the primary trade
organization representing the U.S. high technology community. EIA has created a host of
activities to enhance the competitiveness of the American producer including such valuable
services as technical standards development, market analysis, government relations, trade shows,
and seminar programs.

55
1–703–907–7700 http://www.tiaonline.org/
The Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) is a full-service national trade organization
with membership of 900 large and small companies that provide communications and
information technology products, materials, systems, distribution services, and professional
services in the United States and around the world. The association's member companies
manufacture or supply virtually all of the products used in the modern communications network.
TIA represents the telecommunications industry with its subsidiary, the MultiMedia
Telecommunications Association (MMTA), in conjunction with the Electronic Industries
Alliance (EIA).
The TIA seeks to provide its members a forum for the examination of industry issues and
information. The association serves as the voice of the manufacturers and suppliers of
communications and information technology products on public policy and international issues
affecting its membership. TIA supports and strives to further the growth of our economy, the
progress of technology, and the betterment of humankind through improved communications.
In 1924, a small group of suppliers to the independent telephone industry organized to plan an
industry trade show. Later, that group became a committee of the United States Independent
Telephone Association. In 1979, the groups split off as a separate affiliated association, the
United States Telecommunications Suppliers Association (USTSA), and became one of the
world's premier organizers of telecom exhibitions and seminars. TIA was formed in April 1988
after a merger of USTSA and the Information and Telecommunications Technologies Group of
EIA. EIA began as the Radio Manufacturers Association (RMA) in 1924.
TIA is a member-driven organization. Thirty-one board members are selected from member
companies to formulate policy, which is carried out by a staff of more than 50 in the Washington,
DC area. There are six issue-oriented standing committees:
• Membership Scope and Development.
• International.
• Marketing and Trade Shows.
• Public Policy and Government Relations.
• Small Company.
• Technical.
Each committee addresses the subject areas of major concern to TIA members. Each committee
is chaired by a board member.

56
TIA's five product-oriented divisions are:
• User Premises Equipment.
• Network Equipment.
• Wireless Communications.
• Fiber Optics.
• Satellite Communications.
Each division is concerned with legislative and regulatory issues of product manufacturers and
prepares standards dealing with performance testing and compatibility.
1–800–565–PSWN http://www.pswn.gov/
Everyone living within the United States expects government entities to respond, mitigate
damage, and provide emergency assistance during disasters. Emergency workers are trained to
respond to a variety of events, such as natural and technological disasters, terrorist actions, and
criminal activities, as well as to conduct other life-saving activities such as search and rescue
operations. To be effective before, during, and after their response, public safety officials,
throughout all levels of government, must be able to communicate with each other. Currently,
Federal, State, and local public safety entities compete for limited radio spectrum, have limited
public safety budgets, and face challenges in keeping pace with advances in technology.
Moreover, public safety officials operate separate tactical communications networks.
Upon these premises, PSWN’s mission is to provide seamless, coordinated, and integrated public
safety communications for the safe, effective, and efficient protection of life and property.
PSWN’s vision of improved communications is shared with local, State, and Federal agencies
whose missions encompass the protection of life and property.

57
12. ACRONYMS
AM Amplitude Modulation
ANSI American National Standards Institute
APCO Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials
CSG Council of State Governments
EIA Electronics Industry Alliance
FCC Federal Communications Commission
FM Frequency Modulation
IRAC Interdepartmental Radio Advisory Committee
IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
IF Intermediate Frequency
IM Intermodulation
ITS Institute for Telecommunication Sciences
ITU International Telecommunications Union
JAN Joint Army-Navy
JUSTNET Justice Technology Information Network
LMR Land Mobile Radio
MMTA MultiMedia Telecommunications Association
NASTD National Association of State Telecommunications Directors
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
NIJ National Institute of Justice
NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology
NLECTC National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center
NTIA National Telecommunications and Information Administration
OLES Office of Law Enforcement Standards
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PSWN Public Safety Wireless Network
RCC Radio Common Carrier
RF Radio Frequency
RG Radio Grade (very old term)
RMA Radio Manufacturers Association

58
SMR Specialized Mobile Radio
SWR Standing Wave Ratio
TDR Time-Domain Reflectometry
TIA Telecommunications Industry Association
UHF Ultra-High Frequency
USTSA United States Telecommunications Suppliers Association
VHF Very-High Frequency
VSWR Voltage Standing Wave Ratio
WWW World Wide Web

59
13. REFERENCES
[1] NTIA, Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Federal Frequency Management, U.S.
Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Washington, DC.
[2] FCC, “Private Land Mobile Services,” Title 47, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 90,
Oct. 1, 1997, U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents,
Washington, DC.
[3] FCC, “Private Radio Services Applications and Proceedings,” Title 47, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 1, Subpart F, Oct. 1, 1997, U.S. Government Printing Office,
Superintendent of Documents, Washington, DC.
[4] Telecommunications Industry Association, “Project 25, the TIA-Published 102–Series
Documents,” Jun. 1998, Arlington, VA.
[5] J.C. Maxwell, “A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field,” Proc. Royal Soc.
(London), Vol. 13, p. 531, 1864.
[6] H. Hertz, “Uber Sehr Schnelle Electrische Schwingungen,” Wied. Ann., Vol. 31, p. 421,
1887.
[7] W.L. Weeks, Antenna Engineering, Mc
Graw-Hill, 1968.
[8] W.F. Snyder and C.L. Bragaw, “Achievement in Radio,” NBS Sp. Pub. 555, Oct. 1986.
[9] V.H. Rumsey, “Reaction Concept in Electromagnetic Theory,” Phys. Rev., Vol. 94,
No. 6, pp. 1483–1491, Jun. 1954.
[10] IEEE, “Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms,” ANSI/IEEE Std.
100–1996.
[11] IEEE, “Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas,” IEEE Std. 145–1993.
[12] J.D. Kraus, Antennas, Mc
Graw-Hill, 1950, pp. 69, 81, and 83.
[13] W.A. Kissick and J.M. Harman, Communications Range Predictions for Mobile Radio
Systems, NIJ Rept. 201–88, Jan. 1988.
[14] E.C. Jordan, “Acoustic Models of Radio Antennas,” Ohio State Experiment Station,
Bulletin 108, 1938.
[15] Dept. of Defense, “RF Transmission Lines and Fittings,” MIL-HDBK-216, Jan. 1962.

60
[16] M. Hata, “Empirical Formula for Propagation Loss in Land Mobile Radio Services,”
IEEE Trans. on Veh. Tech., Vol. VT-29, No. 3, Aug. 1980, pp. 317–325.
[17] R.D. Jennings and S.J. Paulson, Communication System Performance Model for VHF and
Higher Frequencies, OT Rept. 77–128, Oct. 1977.
[18] G.A. Hufford, A.G. Longley, and W.A. Kissick, A Guide to the Use of the ITS Irregular
Terrain Model in the Area Prediction Mode, NTIA Rept. 82–100, Apr. 1982.
[19] Telecommunications Industry Association, “Minimum Standards for Communication
Antennas, Part I - Base Station Antennas,” EIA/TIA-329-B, Sep. 1989.
[20] National Institute of Justice, Mobile Antennas, NIJ Standard-0205.02, Oct. 1997.
[21] National Institute of Justice, Fixed and Base Station Antennas, NIJ Standard-0204.02,
Jun. 1998.
[22] Telecommunications Industry Association, “Minimum Standards for Communication
Antennas, Part II - Vehicular Antennas,” EIA/TIA-329-B-1, Sep. 1989.
[23] National Fire Protection Association, Lightning Protection Code, NFPA No. 78–1983,
Quincy, MA.
[24] IEEE, “IEEE Standard Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio
Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz,” ANSI/IEEE Std. C95.1-1991,
revised 1997.

61
14. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Numerous manufacturers have kindly granted permission for photographs and measured data for
certain of their products to be used in this report. As stated in Footnote 1 (sec. 1), these products
and data have been referenced as typical examples or to explain more clearly the technical
concepts and principles being presented. In no case does such reference to these sources, their
products, and their data imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of
Justice, or any other U.S. Government department or agency, nor does it imply that the sources,
products, or data identified are necessarily the best available for the selected purpose.
Those manufacturers who have granted permission for photographs of their products or plots of
their measured data to be included in this report and the World Wide Web references for the
information are the following:
P ©
Andrew Corporation
Orlando Park, IL
< Figure 29(a)—coaxial cable commonly used for LMR base-station applications.
Accessed at http://www.andrew.com/products/basestation/heliax/lowd.asp on 03/17/99.
P ©
Antenna Specialists
Cleveland, OH
< Figure 6(b)—a typical monopole antenna for mobile applications.
Accessed at http://www.decibelproducts.com/marketing/catalog/asp-701/pasp-701.html on 03/12/99.
< Figure 29(b)—coaxial cable commonly used for LMR mobile applications.
Accessed at http://allentele.com/antenna/lm_cat/lmrpg35.html on 03/09/99.
P ©
Bluewave Antenna Systems Ltd.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
< Figure 9 —a typical folded-dipole antenna.
Accessed at http://www.bluewave.ab.ca/bw421e.html on 03/16/99.
P ©
Decibel Products
Dallas, TX
< Figure 6(a)—a typical monopole antenna for base-station applications.
Accessed at http://www.allentele.com/antenna/lm_cat/lmrpg09.html on 03/15/99.
< Figure 8—a typical monopole antenna horizontal-plane pattern, base-station
application.
Accessed at http://www.decibelproducts.com/patterns/patterns.cfm?path=patterns/ASP682_Series
on 03/12/99.
< Figure 13—a typical corner-reflector antenna.
Accessed at http://www.decibelproducts.com/marketing/catalog/db252/pdb252.html on 03/13/99.

62
< Figure 14—a typical corner-reflector antenna horizontal-plane pattern.
on 03/09/99.
< Figure 16—a typical Yagi antenna.
Accessed at http://www.decibelproducts.com/marketing/catalog/asp-960/pasp-962.html on 03/12/99.
< Figure 17—a typical Yagi antenna horizontal-plane pattern.
on 03/12/99.
< Figure 20—a typical log-periodic antenna horizontal-plane pattern.
on 03/15/99.
< Figure 21—a typical vertical array using folded dipoles.
< Figure 24—a typical vertical-plane radiation pattern without “tilt.”
Accessed at http://www.decibelproducts.com/patterns/patterns.cfm?path=patterns/DB420_Series/420C
on 03/15/99.
< Figure 25—a typical vertical-plane radiation pattern with 8o
“tilt.”
Accessed at
http://www.decibelproducts.com/patterns/patterns.cfm?path=patterns/ASP975_Series/ASPD975
on 03/15/99.
< Figure 30—a VHF duplexer.
< Figure 31(a)—a hybrid combiner.
Accessed at http://www.decibelproducts.com/marketing/catalog/db43516/pdb4351-2.html on 03/17/99.
< Figure 31(b)—a cavity combiner.
Accessed at http://www.decibleproducts.com/marketing/catalog/db4360/pdb4360.html on 03/17/99.
< Figure 32—an intermodulation suppression device.
Accessed at http://www.decibelproducts.com/marketing/catalog/db47104/pdb4713ht.html on 03/17/99.
< Figure 33—a multicoupler.
P ©
R.N. Electronics Ltd.
Mountnessing, Essex, UK
< Figure 19—a typical log-periodic antenna.
Accessed at http://www.rfdesign.co.uk/mlpa30121.htm on 03/18/99.

Antenna System Guide

More Related Content

What's hot (8)

Similar to Antenna System Guide (20)

More from Huynh MVT (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Antenna System Guide