Attitude scale

SUBMITTED TO:-
Dr. Hemantlata Sharma,
Dept. Of Education, M.D.U.
SUBMITTED BY: -
Gunjan Verma,
Ph.D - 704

 INTRODUCTION.
COMPONENTS OF ATTITUDE.
ATTITUDE SCALE.
DIMENSIONS OF ATTITUDE
SCALE.
THURSTONE SCALE.
LIKERT SCALE.
CONCLUSION.
REFERENCES.

 The word attitude has been derived from
Latin word ‘Aptus’. Which means ability.
 Attitude is an established way of thinking or
feeling reflected in a person’s behaviour
towards others.
 It is a tendency to respond positively or
negatively towards a certain idea, object,
person or situation.
 In influences a person’s choices of action.
 It is what a person believes in or what a
person feels.

 Attitude can not be
measured in absolute
terms.
It can be observed in
terms of opinion
which can be elicited
from an individual’s
overt behaviour- both
verbal and non verbal.

 Eysnck(1972), “An attitude is normally
defined as a perceptual orientation &
response readiness in relation to a particular
object or class of objects”.
 Frank Freeman,“ An attitude is a
dispositional readiness to respond to certain
situations, persons or objects in a consistent
manner which has been learned and becomes
one’s typical mode of response” .

Attitudes are learnt.
Attitudes have referents.
Attitudes are social learning.
Attitudes are effective.
Attitudes vary in intensity.
Attitudes have a time dimension.
Attitudes are evolutions.

Attitudes are adopted also.
Attitudes are formed due to the process of
differentiation.
Some attitudes are formed due to some shock or
tragedy.
Attitudes are inferred.
Attitudes are complex.
Attitudes have a duration factor.

 It has three components:-
 Affective component:- The feelings or
emotions towards objects.
Ex- I am scared of spiders.
 Behavioural component:-the way the
attitude we have influences how we act or
behave.
Ex- I will avoid spiders and scream if i see
one.

 COGNITIVE
COMPONENT:-
This involves a
person’s belief /
knowledge about
an attitude
object.
Ex- I believe
spiders are
dangerous.
o This model is also
known as ABC
model of attitude.

 The word ‘scale’ come from the Latin
word scala, meaning a ladder or flight of
steps, a scale represents a series of ordered
steps at fixed intervals used as a standard of
measurement.
 An attitude scale is a special type of
questionnaire designed to produce scores
indicating the intensity and direction (for or
against) of a person’s feelings about an
object or event.

 An attitude scale, is a tool prepared for the
purpose of measuring people's attitude to an
issue is called attitude scale.
 An attitude scale is designed to provide a
valid, or accurate measure of an individual’s
social attitude.

 DIRECTION: -
 It is a positive or
negative feeling
about something .
 It is an important
aspect of attitude.
 Ex- I like horses.
(Positive direction).
 I don’t like horses
(Negative direction.)

 It describes the amount of liking or disliking
attached to an attitude.
 Students may have different degrees of
liking, which can be measured from a
moderate to strong to very strong.
 The idea of degree can be applied to the
negative feelings towards an object also.

 It shows strength of feeling.
 At a high degree of intensity, some given kind
of behaviour is motivated.
 Also the comparison of strength of one
attitude to another may determine which
one becomes the basis of action.
 Ex – I am crazy about horses.
 This example shows high intensity of
attitude.

 Behaviour – she eats ice-cream.
 Affective reaction- she likes eating ice-
cream.
 Self – report – she tells us that she likes
eating ice-cream.
 Peer – report – her friends tells us.
 Physiological measure – heart rate.
 People may conceal their attitudes and
express socially acceptable opinions.
Ex- Politicians kissing a baby.
Is this behaviour a true affection towards
infants?

 It is the first formal method designed to measure
attitude.
 It was developed by Louis Leon thurstone in
1928.
 It is also known as method of equal appearing
interval.
 It is made up of statements about the particular
issues.
 consists of statements which have a range of
weights from high (usually 11) to low (usually 1).
 Subjects select the attitudinal statements they
agree with most.

 Selection of statement: -
1) 60 short statements regarding the issue
under study was collected. (historically,
130). Statements were short,
straightforward and unambiguous.
2) These statements should express opinions
not facts.
3) Statements should express all shades of
attitude from extremely favourable,
through neutral , to extremely non-
favourable.

 For this example, statements about same
sex marriage: -
 It’s should be against the law.
 There’s absolutely nothing wrong with it.
 Marriage is between a man and a woman.
 It should be a sin.
 It’s perfectly appropriate for two consenting
adults.
 It should be legalized.
 It can harm children.
 Same sex couples should have the same legal
rights as a male/female couple.
 It’s just horrible. It can’t do any harm.

 Selected statements were mimeographed on
separate slips of paper .
 Statements were sent out to about 30
judges( thurstone sent out to 300 judges) for
sorting into 11 or 9 piles. Each statement
should be put in one of the 11 or 9 piles.

 Categories starting from extremely
favourable to extremely unfavourable.

 After the judges have categorized the
statements, a frequency table to each
statement is drawn separately, showing the
number of judges put it in different
categories.

 For each statement, compute the Median and
the Interquartile Range.
 Median - is the value above and below which
50% of the ratings fall.
 The first quartile (Q1) - is the value below
which 25% of the cases fall and above which
75% of the cases fall - in other words, the
25th percentile.
 The median is the 50th percentile.
 The third quartile, Q3, is the 75th
percentile. The Interquartile Range is the
difference between third and first quartile,
or Q3 - Q1.

 If the judges cannot rate the item on its
favourability or show a high degree of
variability in their judgments, the item is
eliminated.
 The percentage of judges who placed each
statement in the different category
constitutes the basic data for computing the
scale value of a statement.
 The Median position (50th percentile or 2nd
quartile) assigned by the judges to the
statement is called the scale value of
statement.

 So, let’s assume that the average ratings
among our judges are as below:
 It’s should be against the law- 1.7
 There’s absolutely nothing wrong with it- 6.8
 Marriage is between a man and a woman-
2.4
 It should be a sin- 1.3
 It’s perfectly appropriate for two consenting
adults - 8.4
 It should be legalized - 9.1

 Arranged in random order and administered.
 Respondents tick mark the statements with
which they agree and leave the rest.
 The weights (favourability rating) for the
checked statements are summed and divided
by the number of statements checked.
 Example- the respondent selected #2, #3, #5-
his score will be- 6.8+ 2.4 + 8.4 / 3 = 5.8

 The most popular attitude scale type.
 It was given by Rensis Likert (1932).
 It is also known as Summated rating scale.
 Respondents indicate the extent to which
they endorse the statements (e.g., agree
/ disagree).

 Collect statement:-
This process does not require the
categorization of items by a group of judges.
Items (50 – 60) are selected on the basis of
the response of subjects to whom they are
administered in the course of developing the
test.
The statements are arranged randomly and a
have a five point rating scale- ‘strongly
agree’ , ‘agree’, ‘uncertain’, ‘Disagree’ ,
‘Strongly Disagree’.

After the respondents have finished with the list,
the statements are evaluated for the selection or
rejection in the final draft.
The list is printed and sent out to a sample of
about 200 members of the population concerned.
The criteria for this test is only ‘internal
consistency’.

o The number of favourable and unfavourable
statements should be approximately equal.
o The sum of the statements credits
represents the score of an individual.

Those statements for which the t-ratio is equal or greater
than 1.96 are suitable for selection.
Significance of difference is tested by t-ratio.
The mean scores and variances of each statement in the
top and bottom piles are computed separately.
Top 25 percent and bottom 25 percent scripts are taken
out.
Scripts are arranged in descending order of total scores.

Then top 10 to 15 favourable and
unfavourable statements are selected and
arranged randomly to shape the final
draft.
All the statements are sorted out and
arranged in descending order of numerical
value of t.

Final script administered.
Tick mark each of the statements.
Award marks- 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. ( reverse marks for reversal
items).
The sum of the scores of a respondent represents his
total score which can be interpreted in terms of
empirically established norms.

Thurstone scale Likert scale
 There is agreement or
disagreement among
a large number of
statement.
 Time consuming,
tiring and dissuading.
 Require judges.
 Usually five point
scale.
 Easy to explain and
develop.
 No need of judges.
 Designed to improve
the level of
measurement in
social research.

 Pathak, R.P (2012). Measurment and
Evaluation In Education. Noida: Dorling
Kindersley.
 Kochaar, S.K (2009). Guidance and
Counselling in Colleges and Universities.
New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
 Aggrawal, J.C (2011). Educational,
Vocational Guidance and Counselling. New
Delhi: Doaba House.
 Attitudes and Behaviour by Saul Mcleed,
2014.

Attitude scale

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Attitude scale (20)

More from Gunjan Verma (14)

Recently uploaded (20)

Attitude scale