ch06 Cust Value Metrics.ppt
- 1. Customer Relationship Management A Databased Approach V. Kumar Werner J. Reinartz Instructor’s Presentation Slides
- 2. Chapter Six Customer Value Metrics: Concepts and Practices
- 3. Topics Discussed • Popular Customer-based Value Metrics • Strategic Customer-based Value Metrics • Popular Customer Selection Strategies • Lift charts • Cases
- 4. Customer Based Value Metrics Customer based value metrics Popular Strategic RFM Past Customer Value LTV Metrics Size Of Wallet Transition Matrix Share of Category Reqt. Share of Wallet Customer Equity
- 5. Size-of-Wallet • Size-of-wallet ($) of customer in a category = Sj Where: Sj = sales to the focal customer by the firm j j = firm, = summation of value of sales made by all the J firms that sell a category of products to the focal customer Information source: Primary market research Evaluation: Critical measure for customer-centric organizations based on the assumption that a large wallet size indicates more revenues and profits Example: A consumer might spend an average of $400 every month on groceries across the supermarkets she shops at. Her size-of-wallet is $400 J j 1 J j 1
- 6. • SCR (%) of firm or brand in category = Vij / Vij j = firm, V = purchase volume, i = those customers who buy brand = summation of volume purchased by all the I customers from a firm j, = summation of volume purchased by all I customers from all j firms Information source: Numerator: volumetric sales of the focal firm - from internal records Denominator: total volumetric purchases of the focal firm’s buyer base- through market and distribution panels, or primary market research (surveys) and extrapolated to the entire buyer base Evaluation: Accepted measure of customer loyalty for FMCG categories, controls for the total volume of segments/individuals category requirements; however, does not indicate if a high SCR customer will generate substantial revenues or profits Share of Category Requirement (SCR) I i 1 I i 1 J j 1 I i 1 I i 1 J j 1
- 7. Computation of SCR Ratio - Example Total requirement of Notebook computers per customer A Total number of Notebook Computers purchased from ABC Computers per customer per period B Share of category requirement for ABC computers per customer per period B/A Customer 1 100 20 .20 Customer 2 1000 200 .20 Customer 3 1000 500 .50 Customer 3 has the highest SCR. Therefore, ABC Computers should identify customer 3 and target more of their marketing efforts (mailers, advertisements etc.) towards customer 3 Also, customer 3’s size-of-wallet (column A), is the largest
- 8. Share-of-Wallet (SW) • Individual Share-of-Wallet – Individual Share-of-Wallet of firm to customer (%) = Sj / Sj Where: S = sales to the focal customer, j = firm, = summation of value of sales made by all the J firms that sell a category of products to a buyer Information source: Numerator: From internal records Denominator: From primary market research (surveys), administered to individual customers, often collected for a representative sample and then extrapolated to the entire buyer base Evaluation: Important measure of customer loyalty; however, SW is unable to provide a clear indication of future revenues and profits that can be expected from a customer J j 1 J j 1
- 9. • Aggregate Share-of-Wallet (ASW) (brand or firm level) – Aggregate Share-of-Wallet of firm (%) = Individual Share-of- Walletji / number of customers = Si / Sij Where: S = sales to the focal customer, j = firm, i = customers who buy brand Information source: Numerator: From internal records Denominator: Through market and distribution panels, or primary market research (surveys) and extrapolated to the entire buyer Evaluation: Important measure of customer loyalty Share-of-Wallet (contd.) I i 1 J j 1 I i 1 I i 1
- 10. Applications of SCR and SW • SCR -for categories where the variance of customer expenditures is relatively small • SW - if the variance of consumer expenditures is relatively high • Share-of-wallet and Size-of-wallet simultaneously – with same share-of-wallet, different attractiveness as customers: Example: Share-of-Wallet Size-of-Wallet Absolute expenses with firm Buyer 1 50% $400 $200 Buyer 2 50% $50 $25 Absolute attractiveness of Buyer 1 eight times higher than buyer 2
- 11. Segmenting Customers Along Share of Wallet and Size of Wallet The matrix shows that the recommended strategies for different segments differ substantively. The firm makes optimal resource allocation decisions only by segmenting customers along the two dimensions simultaneously High Share-of-wallet Low Size-of-wallet Hold on Do nothing Target for additional selling Maintain and guard Small Large
- 12. Share of Wallet and Market Share (MS) • MS of firm = (Share-of-walleti * Size of wallet) / Sj Where: S = sales to the focal customer, j = firm, i = customers who buy the brand • Difference between share-of-wallet and market share: MS is calculated across buyers and non-buyers whereas SW is calculated only among buyers • MS is measured on a percent basis and can be computed based on unit volume, $ volume or equivalent unit volumes (grams, ounces) • Example: – BINGO has 5,000 customers with an average expense at BINGO of $150 per month (=share-of-wallet * size of wallet) – The total grocery sales in BINGO’s trade area are $5,000,000 per month BINGO’s market share is (5,000 * $150) / $5,000,000 = 15% I i 1 J j 1
- 13. Transition Matrix Brand Currently Purchased Brand Purchased next time A B C A 70% 20% 10% B 10% 80% 10% C 25% 15% 60% Characterizes a customer’s likelihood to buy over time or a brand’s likelihood to be bought. Example: -The probability that a consumer of Brand A will transition to Brand B and then come back to Brand A in the next two purchase occasions is 20% * 10% = 2%. - If , on an average, a customer purchases twice per period, the two purchases could be AA, AB, AC, BA, BB, BC, CA, CB, or CC. -We can compute the probability of each of these outcomes if we know the brand that the customer bought last
- 14. Strategic Customer Based Value Metrics • RFM • Past Customer Value • LTV Metrics • Customer Equity
- 15. RFM • Recency, Frequency and Monetary Value-applied on historical data • Recency -how long it has been since a customer last placed an order with the company • Frequency-how often a customer orders from the company in a certain defined period • Monetary value- the amount that a customer spends on an average transaction • Tracks customer behavior over time in a state-space
- 16. Computation of RFM Two common methods: • Method 1: Sorting customer data based on RFM, grouping and analyzing results • Method 2: Computing relative weights for R,F and M using regression techniques
- 17. RFM Method 1 • Example: – Customer base: 400,000 customers – Sample size: 40,000 customers – Firm’s marketing mailer campaign: $150 discount coupon – Response rate: 808 customers (2.02%) Recency coding: Analysis – Test group of 40,000 customers is sorted in a descending order based on the criterion of ‘most recent purchase date’. – The earliest purchasers are listed on the top and the oldest are listed at the bottom. The sorted data is divided into five equal groups (20% in each group) – The top most group is assigned a recency code of 1 and the next group a code of 2 and so on, until the bottom most group is assigned a code of 5 – Analysis of customer response data shows that the mailer campaign got the highest response from customers grouped in recency code 1 followed by code 2 etc
- 18. Response and Recency Recency Vs. Response 4.50% 2.80% 1.50% 1.05% 0.25% 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 1 2 3 4 5 Recency Code (1 - 5) Customer Response % Response % Graph depicts the distribution of percentage of those customers who responded fell within the recency code grouping of 1 through 5 Highest response rate (4.5%) for the campaign was from customers in the test group who fell in the highest recency quintile (recency code =1)
- 19. Response and Frequency Frequency Vs. Response 2.45% 2.22% 2.08% 1.67% 1.68% 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 1 2 3 4 5 Frequency Code 1-5 Response Rate % Response % Graph depicts the distribution of what % of those customers who responded fell within the frequency code grouping of 1 through 5 The highest response rate (2.45%) for the campaign was from customers in the test group who fell in the highest frequency quintile (frequency code =1)
- 20. Response and Monetary Value Monetary Value Vs. Response 2.35% 2.05% 1.95% 1.90% 1.85% 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 1 2 3 4 5 Monetary Value Code (1-5) Response Rate % Response % Customer data is sorted, grouped and coded with a 1 to 5 value The highest response rate (2.35%) for the campaign was from those customers in the test group who fell in the highest monetary value quintile (monetary value code =1).
- 21. Limitations • RFM method 1 independently links customer response data with R, F and M values and then groups customers, belonging to specific RFM codes • May not produce equal number of customers under each RFM cell since individual metrics R, F, and M are likely to be somewhat correlated – For example, a person spending more (high M) is also likely, on average, to buy more frequently (high F) • For practical purposes, it is desirable to have exactly the same number of individuals in each RFM cell
- 22. RFM Cell Sorting Example: • List of 40,000 test group customers is first sorted for Recency and grouped into 5 equal groups of 8000 each • The 8000 customers in each group is then sorted based on Frequency and divided into five equal groups of 1600 each- at the end of this stage, there will be RF codes starting from 11 through 55 with each group having 1600 customers • In the last stage, each of the RF groups is further sorted based on monetary value and divided into five equal groups of 320 customers each - RFM codes starting from 111 through 555 each having 320 customers • Considering each RFM code as a cell, there will be 125 cells ( 5 recency divisions * 5 frequency divisions * 5 monetary value divisions = 125 RFM Codes)
- 23. RFM Cell Sorting (contd.) 1 2 3 4 5 41 42 43 44 45 Customer Database R F 11 12 13 14 15 M Sorted Once Sorted five times per R quintile Sorted twenty five times per R quintile 131 132 133 134 135 441 442 443 444 445
- 24. Breakeven Value • Breakeven - net profit from a marketing promotion equals the cost associated with conducting the promotion • Breakeven Value (BE) = unit cost price/ unit net profit • BE computes the minimum response rates required in order to offset the promotional costs involved and thereby not incur any losses • Example: In mailing $150 discount coupons, - The cost per mailing piece is $1.00 - The net profit (after all costs) per used coupon is $45, Breakeven Value (BE) = $1.00/$45 = 0.0222 or 2.22%
- 25. Breakeven Index • Breakeven Index (BEI) = ((Actual Response Rate – BE)/BE)* 100 Example: If the actual response rate of a particular RFM cell was 3.5% BE is 2.22%, The BEI = ((3.5% - 2.22%)/2.22%)*100 = 57.66 • Positive BEI value some profit was made from the group of customers • 0 BEI value the transactions just broke even • Negative BEI value the transactions resulted in a loss
- 26. RFM and BEI 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 111 132 153 224 245 321 342 413 434 455 531 552 RFM Cell Codes BEI Break-Even Index
- 27. RFM and BEI (contd.) • Customers with higher RFM values tend to have higher BEI values • Customers with a lower recency value but relatively higher F and M values tend to have positive BEI values • Customer response rate drops more rapidly for the recency metric • Customer response rate for the frequency metric drops more rapidly than that for the monetary value metric
- 28. RFM & Profitability Test Full customer base RFM Selection Average response rate 2.02% 2.02% 15.25% # of responses 808 8080 2732.8 Average Net profit/Sale $45 $45 $45 Net Revenue $36360 $363600 $122,976 # of Mailers sent 40,000 400,000 17920 Cost per mailer $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 Mailing cost $40,000 $400,000 $17920 Profits ($3640) ($36400) $105056
- 29. RFM Method 2- Regression Method • Regression techniques to compute the relative weights of the R, F, and M metrics • Relative weights are used to compute the cumulative points of each customer • The pre-computed weights for R, F and M, based on a test sample are used to assign RFM scores to each customer • The higher the computed score, the more profitable the customer is likely to be in the future • This method is flexible and can be tailored to each business situation
- 30. Recency Score • 20 if within past 2 months; 10 if within past 4 months; 05 if within past 6 months; 03 if within past 9 months; 01 if within past 12 months; Relative weight = 5 Customer Purchases (Number) Recency (Months) Assigned Points Weighted Points 1 2 20 100 JOHN 2 4 10 50 3 9 3 15 SMITH 1 6 5 25 1 2 20 100 MAGS 2 4 10 50 3 6 5 25 4 9 3 15
- 31. Frequency Score • Points for Frequency: 3 points for each purchase within 12 months; Maximum = 15 points; Relative weight = 2 Customer Purchases(#) Frequency Assigned Points Weighted Points 1 1 3 6 JOHN 2 1 3 6 3 1 3 6 SMITH 1 2 6 12 1 1 3 6 MAGS 2 1 3 6 3 2 6 12 4 1 3 6
- 32. Monetary Value Score • Monetary Value: 10 percent of the $ Volume of Purchase with 12 months; Maximum = 25 points; Relative weight = 3 Customer Purchases (Number) Monetary Assigned Points Weighted Points 1 $40 4 12 JOHN 2 $120 12 36 3 $60 6 18 SMITH 1 $400 25 75 1 $90 9 27 MAGS 2 $70 7 21 3 $80 8 24 4 $40 4 12
- 33. Customer Purchases (Number) Total Weighted Points Cumulative Points 1 118 118 JOHN 2 92 210 3 39 249 SMITH 1 112 112 1 133 133 MAGS 2 77 210 3 61 271 4 37 308 RFM Cumulative Score • Cumulative scores: 249 for John, 112 for Smith and 308 for Mags; indicate a potential preference for Mags • John seems to be a good prospect, but mailing to Smith might be a misdirected marketing effort
- 34. • Computation of Customer Profitability • Past Customer Value of a customer Where I = number representing the customer, r = applicable discount rate n = number of time periods prior to current period when purchase was made GCin = Gross Contribution of transaction of the ith customer in the nth time period • Since products/services are bought at different points in time during the customer’s lifetime, all transactions have to be adjusted for the time value of money • Limitations: Does not consider whether a customer is going to be active in the future. Also does not incorporate the expected cost of maintaining the customer in the future Past Customer Value n n n in r GC 1 ) 1 ( *
- 35. Spending Pattern of a Customer The above customer is worth $302.01 in contribution margin, expressed in net present value in May dollars. By comparing this score among a set of customers a prioritization is arrived at for directing future marketing efforts Jan Feb March April May $ Amount 800 50 50 30 20 GC 240 15 15 9 6 302.01486 5 ) 0125 . 0 1 ( 240 4 ) 0125 . 0 1 ( 15 3 ) 0125 . 0 1 ( 15 2 ) 0125 . 0 1 ( 9 ) 0125 . 0 1 ( 6 Scoring Value Customer Past 0.3 Amount X Purchase (GC) Contribution Gross = + + + + + + + + + = ´ =
- 36. Lifetime Value metrics (Net Present Value models) • Multi-period evaluation of a customer’s value to the firm Recurring Revenues Recurring costs Contribution margin Lifetime of a customer Lifetime Profit Acquisition cost LTV Discount rate
- 37. Calculation of Lifetime Value: Simple Definition where LTV = lifetime value of an individual customer in $, CM = contribution margin, = interest rate, t = time unit, = summation of contribution margins across time periods • LTV is a measure of a single customer’s worth to the firm • Used for pedagogical and conceptual purposes Information source: CM and T from managerial judgment or from actual purchase data. The interest rate, a function of a firm’s cost of capital, can be obtained from financial accounting Evaluation: Typically based on past customer behavior and may have limited diagnostic value for future decision-making t T t t CM LTV 1 1 1
- 38. LTV: Definition Accounting for Varying Levels of Contribution Margin Where, LTV = lifetime value of an individual customer i in $, S = Sales to customer i, DC = direct cost of products purchased by customer i, MC = marketing cost of customer i Information source: Information on sales, direct cost, and marketing cost comes from internal company records Many firms installing Activity-Based-Costing (ABC) schemes to arrive at appropriate allocations of customer and process-specific costs t T t it it it MC DC S LTV 1 1 1 ) (
- 39. AC CM Rr LTV t T t it T t 1 1 1 1 LTV: Definition Accounting for Acquisition Cost and Retention Probabilities Where, LTV = lifetime value of an individual customer in $ Rr = retention rate П = Product of retention rates for each time period from 1 to T, AC = acquisition cost T = total time horizon under consideration Assuming that T and that the contribution margin CM does not vary over time, AC Rr CM LTVi 1
- 40. • Sum of the lifetime value of all the customers of a firm • Customer Equity, • Indicator of how much the firm is worth at a particular point in time as a result of the firm’s customer management efforts • Can be seen as a link to the shareholder value of a firm • Customer Equity Share, CESj = CEj / k, where, CE = customer equity , j = focal brand, k = all brands Customer Equity t T t it I i CM CE 1 1 1 1 k CE
- 41. 15006 Total customer equity 1179 9 16 131 0.131 0.85 20 36 0.3 120 4 1683 11 16 153 0.153 0.82 20 36 0.3 120 3 2244 12 16 187 0.187 0.75 20 36 0.3 120 2 3500 14 16 250 0.25 0.63 20 36 0.3 120 1 6400 16 16 400 0.4 0.4 20 36 0.3 120 0 11. Total Disctd. Profits per Period to the Manufact u-rer 10. Discounted Profit per Customer per Period to Manufactu- rer 9 Profit per Customer per period per Manu- facturer 8. Expected Number of Active Customer 7. Surviva l Rate 6. Actual Retention Rate 5. Mktg and Servicin g Costs 4. Manufac -turer Gross Margin 3. Manufa- cturer Margin 2 Sales per Customer 1 Year from Acquis- ition Customer Equity Calculation: Example
- 42. Popular Customer Selection Strategies • Decision Trees – Used for finding the best predictors of a 0/1 or binary dependent variable – Useful when there is a large set of potential predictors for a model – Decision tree algorithms can be used to iteratively search through the data to find out which predictor best separates the two categories of a binary target variable – Typically, this search is performed on two-thirds of the available data with one- third of the data reserved for later use for testing the model that develops – Problem with the approach: prone to over-fitting; the model developed may not perform nearly as well on a new or separate dataset
- 43. Decision Trees- Example Customer data for purchases of hockey equipment from a sporting goods catalog Step 1 Buyer Yes 1280 No 6720 Total 8000 Male Buyer Total Yes 1000 No 4000 Total 5000 Female Buyer Total Yes 280 No 2720 Total 3000 Gender
- 44. Decision Trees- Example (contd.) Female Buyer Total Yes 280 No 2720 Total 3000 Married Yes Buyer Total Yes 200 No 1400 Total 1600 No Buyer Total Yes 80 No 1320 Total 1400 Step 2
- 45. Decision Trees- Example ( contd.) Male Buyer Total Yes 1000 No 4000 Total 5000 Yes Buyer Total Yes 60 No 1140 Total 1200 No Buyer Total Yes 940 No 2860 Total 3800 Bought Scuba Equipment Step 2 (contd.) The process can be repeated for each sub-segment
- 46. Popular Customer Selection Strategies (contd.) • Logistic Regression – Method of choice when the dependent variable is binary and assumes only two discrete values – By inputting values for the predictor variables for each new customer – the logistic model will yield a predicted probability – Customers with high ‘predicted probabilities’ may be chosen to receive an offer since they seem more likely to respond positively
- 47. Logistic Regression- Examples • Example 1: Home ownership – Home ownership as a function of income can be modeled whereby ownership is delineated by a 1 and non-ownership a 0 – The predicted value based on the model is interpreted as the probability that the individual is a homeowner – With a positive correlation between increasing income and increasing probability of ownership, can expect results as • predicted probability of ownership is .22 for a person with an income of $35,00 • predicted probability of .95 for a person with a $250,000 income
- 48. Logistic Regression- Examples (contd.) • Example 2: Credit Card Offering – Dependent Variable-- whether the customer signed up for a ‘gold’ card offer or not – Predictor Variables--other bank services the customer used plus financial and demographic customer information – By inputting values for the predictor variables for each new customer, the logistic model will yield a predicted probability – Customers with high ‘predicted probabilities’ may be chosen to receive the offer since they seem more likely to respond positively
- 49. Linear and Logistic Regressions • In linear regression, the effect of one unit change in the independent variable on the dependent variable is assumed to be a constant represented by the slope of a straight line • For logistic regression the effect of a one-unit increase in the predictor variable varies along an s- shaped curve. This means that at the extremes, a one-unit change has very little effect, but in the middle a one unit change has a fairly large effect
- 50. Logistic Regression Transformation Steps Step 1: If p represents the probability of an event occurring, take the ratio Since p is a positive quantity less than 1, the range of this expression is 0 to infinity Step2: Take the logarithm of this ratio: This transformation allows the range of values for this expression to lie between negative infinity and positive infinity p p 1 p p 1 log
- 51. Logistic Regression Transformation Steps (contd.) • Step 3: The value can be considered as the dependent variable and a linear relationship of this value with predictor variables in the form z = can be written The and can be estimated • Step 4. In order to obtain the predicted probability p, a back transformation is to be done Since = z = , = Then calculate the probability p of an event occurring, the variable of interest, as p = p p 1 log e x s p p 1 log e x p p 1 z e z e 1 1
- 52. Techniques to Evaluate Alternative Customer Selection Strategies • Lift Charts – Lifts indicate how much better a model performs than the ‘no model’ or average performance – Can be used to track a model’s performance over time, or to compare a model’s performance on different samples – The lift will then equal (response rate for each decile) ÷ (overall response rate) ×100 – The cumulative lift = (cumulative response rate) ÷ (overall response rate) ×100 – The cumulative response rate = cumulative # buyers ÷ cumulative # customers
- 53. Lift Performance Illustration Decile # of Customers # of Buyers Response Rate Lift Cumulative Lift 1 5000 1759 35.18% 3.09 3.09 2 5000 1126 22.52% 1.98 5.07 3 5000 998 19.96% 1.75 6.82 4 5000 554 11.08% 0.97 7.80 5 5000 449 8.98% 0.79 8.59 6 5000 337 6.74% 0.59 9.18 7 5000 221 4.42% 0.39 9.57 8 5000 113 2.26% 0.20 9.76 9 5000 89 1.78% 0.16 9.92 10 5000 45 0.90% 0.08 10.00
- 54. Decile Analysis Decile Analysis 35.18% 22.52% 19.96% 11.08% 8.98% 6.74% 4.42% 2.26% 1.78% 0.90% 0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Deciles Response Rate The Decile analysis distributes customers into ten equal size groups For a model that performs well, customers in the first decile exhibit the highest response rate
- 55. Lift Analysis Lift Analysis 3.09 1.98 1.75 0.97 0.79 0.59 0.39 0.20 0.16 0.08 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Deciles Lift Lifts that exceed 1 indicate better than average performance Less than 1 indicate a poorer than average performance For the top decile the lift is 3.09; indicates that by targeting only these customers one can expect to yield 3.09 times the number of buyers found by randomly mailing the same number of customers
- 56. Cumulative Lift Analysis Cumulative Lift Analysis 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Decile Cumulative Lift The cumulative lifts for the model reveal what proportion of responders we can expect to gain from targeting a specific percent of customers using the model Choosing the top 30 % of the customers from the top three deciles will obtain 68% of the total responders
- 57. Lift Performance Comparison Comparison of Models 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Deciles Cumulative Lift Logistic Past Customer Value RFM No Model Logistic models tend to provide the best lift performance The Past Customer Value approach provides the next best performance The traditional RFM approach exhibits the poorest performance
- 58. Minicase: Catalina - Changing Supermarket Shopper Measurement • Catalina Inc. a Florida-based company that specializes in supermarket shopper tracking and coupon issuing • Built its business model on issuing coupons to grocery shoppers online when they checkout at the cashier • System consists of a printer connected to the cashier’s scanner as well as a database • The information on each shopping basket that checks out via the scanner is then stored in the database
- 59. Minicase: Catalina (contd.) • Using the person’s credit card number or check number, the database links individual shopping baskets over time • The system then allows both manufacturers and retailers to run individualized campaigns based on the information in the database • For customers who use Catalina as a secondary store.- the decision to allocate a gift of say $10, for shopping for 4 weeks in a row spending at least $40, per week in the store • Goal is to selectively target those shoppers where the store only captures a low share-of-wallet and to entice them to change their behavior
- 60. Minicase: Akzo Nobel, NV- Differentiating Customer Service According to Customer Value • One of the world's largest chemical manufacturers and paint makers • The polymer division, which serves exclusively the B-to-B market, established a “tiered customer service policy” in the early 2000’s • Company developed a thorough list of all possible service activities that is currently offered • To formalize customer service activities, the company implemented a customer scorecard mechanism to measure and document contribution margins per individual customer • Service allocation, differentiated as: – services to be free for all types of customers – services subject to negotiation for lower level customer groups – services subject to fees for lower level customers – services not available for the least valuable set of customers
- 61. Summary • Firms use different surrogate measures of customer value to prioritize their customers and to differentially invest in them • Firms can use information about size of wallet and share of wallet together for optimal allocation of resources • Transition matrix provides the probability that a customer will purchase a particular brand if what brand has been purchased the last time is known • The higher the computed RFM score, the more profitable the customer is expected to be, in the future • Firms employ different customer selection strategies to target the right customers • Lift analysis, decile analysis and cumulative lift analysis are various techniques firms use to evaluate alternative selection strategies • Logistic Regression is superior to Past Customer Value and RFM techniques