SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Lecture Slides
Elementary Statistics
Twelfth Edition
and the Triola Statistics Series
by Mario F. Triola
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter 9
Inferences from Two Samples
9-1 Review and Preview
9-2 Two Proportions
9-3 Two Means: Independent Samples
9-4 Two Dependent Samples (Matched Pairs)
9-5 Two Variances or Standard Deviations
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Key Concept
In this section we develop methods for testing
hypotheses and constructing confidence intervals
involving the mean of the differences of the values from
two dependent populations.
With dependent samples, there is some relationship
where each value in one sample is paired with a
corresponding value in the other sample.
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Key Concept
Because the hypothesis test and confidence interval use
the same distribution and standard error, they are
equivalent in the sense that they result in the same
conclusions.
Consequently, the null hypothesis that the mean
difference equals 0 can be tested by determining
whether the confidence interval includes 0.
There are no exact procedures for dealing with
dependent samples, but the t distribution serves as a
reasonably good approximation, so the following
methods are commonly used.
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Dependent Samples
Example – Matched pairs of heights of U.S. presidents
and heights of their main opponents. Since there is a
relationship as a basis for matching the pairs of data,
this data consists of dependent samples.
Height (cm)
of
President
189 173 183 180 179
Height (cm)
of Main
Opponent
170 185 175 180 178
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Good Experimental Design
When designing an experiment or planning an
observational study, using dependent samples with
paired data is generally better than using two
independent samples.
The advantage of using matched pairs is that we reduce
extraneous variation, which could occur if each
experimental unit were treated independently.
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Notation for Dependent Samples
d = individual difference between the two values of a
single matched pair
µd = mean value of the differences d for the population of
all matched pairs of data
= mean value of the differences d for the paired
sample data
sd = standard deviation of the differences d for the paired
sample data
n = number of pairs of sample data
d
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Requirements
1. The sample data are dependent.
2. The samples are simple random samples.
3. Either or both of these conditions is satisfied: The number
of pairs of sample data is large ( n > 30) or the pairs of
values have differences that are from a population having
a distribution that is approximately normal.
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
where degrees of freedom = n – 1
Hypothesis Test Statistic for
Matched Pairs
d
d
d
t
s
n



Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
P-values and Critical Values
P-values: P-values are automatically provided by technology.
If technology is not available, use Table A-3.
Critical values: Use Table A-3 with degrees of freedom
df = n – 1
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Confidence Intervals for
Matched Pairs
Critical values of tα/2:
Use Table A-3 with df = n – 1 degrees of freedom.
d
d E d E

   
/ 2
d
s
E t
n


Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Example
Use the sample data below with a significance level of 0.05 to
test the claim that for the population of heights of presidents
and their main opponents, the differences have a mean
greater than 0 cm (so presidents tend to be taller than their
opponents).
Height (cm)
of
President
189 173 183 180 179
Height (cm)
of Main
Opponent
170 185 175 180 178
Difference
d
19 -12 8 0 1
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Example
Requirement Check:
1. The samples are dependent because the values are
paired.
2. The pairs of data are randomly selected.
3. The number of data points is 5, so normality should be
checked (and it is assumed the condition is met).
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Example
Step 1: The claim is that µd > 0 cm.
Step 2: If the original claim is not true, we have µd ≤ 0 cm.
Step 3: The hypotheses can be written as:
0
0
: 0 cm
: 0 cm
d
d
H
H




Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Example
Step 4: The significance level is α = 0.05.
Step 5: We use the Student t distribution.
The summary statistics are:
3.2
11.4
d
s


Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Example
Step 6: Determine the value of the test statistic:
with df = 5 – 1 = 4
3.2 0
0.628
11.4
5
d
d
d
t
s
n

 
  
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Example
Step 6: Using technology, the P-value is 0.282. Using the
critical value method:
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Example
Step 7: Because the P-value exceeds 0.05, or because the
test statistic does not fall in the critical region, we fail to reject
the null hypothesis.
Conclusion: There is not sufficient evidence to support the
claim that for the population of heights of presidents and their
main opponent, the differences have a mean greater than 0
cm.
In other words, presidents do not appear to be taller than their
opponents.
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Example
Confidence Interval: Support the conclusions with a 90%
confidence interval estimate for µd.
/2
11.4
2.132 10.8694
5
d
s
E t
n

  
3.2 10.8694 3.2 10.8694
7.7 14.1
d
d
d
d E d E



   
   
  
Section 9.4-‹#›
Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Example
We have 90% confidence that the limits of –7.7 cm and 14.1
cm contain the true value of the difference in height
(president’s height – opponent’s height).
See that the interval does contain the value of 0 cm, so it is
very possible that the mean of the differences is equal to 0
cm, indicating that there is no significant difference between
the heights.

More Related Content

PPT
Chapter 9 Section 5.ppt
PPT
Chapter 9 Section 3.ppt
PPT
Chapter 8 Section 5.ppt
PPT
Chapter 9 Section 1.ppt
PPT
Chapter 7 Section 3.ppt
PPT
Chapter 7 Section 4(1).ppt
PPT
Chapter 8 Section 3.ppt
PPT
Chapter 7 Section 2.ppt
Chapter 9 Section 5.ppt
Chapter 9 Section 3.ppt
Chapter 8 Section 5.ppt
Chapter 9 Section 1.ppt
Chapter 7 Section 3.ppt
Chapter 7 Section 4(1).ppt
Chapter 8 Section 3.ppt
Chapter 7 Section 2.ppt

Similar to Chapter 9 Section 4.ppt (20)

PPT
Chapter 9 Section 2.ppt
PPT
Chapter 1 Section 3.ppt
DOCX
Airlines.xlsxDATADestinationSouthwest Fare ($)US Airways Fare .docx
PPT
Chapter 10 Section 1.ppt
PPT
Sfs4e ppt 09
PPT
Chapter 3 Section 4.ppt
PPT
ch14.ppt
PPT
Chapter 8 Section 4.ppt
PPT
Chapter 10 Section 2.ppt
PPT
Chapter 3 Section 3.ppt
PPT
Chapter 8 Section 2.ppt
PPTX
12.1 Korelasi (1).pptx
PPT
Chapter8_central limit_theorem_presentation
PPTX
PDF
Day 12 t test for dependent samples and single samples pdf
PPT
Chap07 interval estimation
PPTX
Hypothesis testing
PPTX
Chi square analysis
PPT
Research in marketing MalhotraMR6e_8.ppt
PPT
Chapter 1 Section 4.ppt
Chapter 9 Section 2.ppt
Chapter 1 Section 3.ppt
Airlines.xlsxDATADestinationSouthwest Fare ($)US Airways Fare .docx
Chapter 10 Section 1.ppt
Sfs4e ppt 09
Chapter 3 Section 4.ppt
ch14.ppt
Chapter 8 Section 4.ppt
Chapter 10 Section 2.ppt
Chapter 3 Section 3.ppt
Chapter 8 Section 2.ppt
12.1 Korelasi (1).pptx
Chapter8_central limit_theorem_presentation
Day 12 t test for dependent samples and single samples pdf
Chap07 interval estimation
Hypothesis testing
Chi square analysis
Research in marketing MalhotraMR6e_8.ppt
Chapter 1 Section 4.ppt
Ad

More from ManoloTaquire (20)

PPT
Chapter 2 Section 3.ppt
PPT
Chapter 4 Section 3.ppt
PPT
Chapter 3 Section 2.ppt
PPT
Chapter 2 Section 4.ppt
PPT
Chapter 6 Section 7.ppt
PPT
Chapter 4 Section 2.ppt
PPT
Chapter 2 Section 1.ppt
PPT
Chapter 3 Section 1.ppt
PPT
Chapter 6 Section 5.ppt
PPT
Chapter 4 Section 1.ppt
PPT
Chapter 4 Section 5.ppt
PPT
Chapter 6 Section 3.ppt
PPT
Chapter 6 Section 1.ppt
PPT
Chapter 5 Section (5).ppt
PPT
Chapter 5 Section (3).ppt
PPT
Chapter 1 Section 2.ppt
PPT
Chapter 6 Section 2.ppt
PPT
Chapter 2 Section 2.ppt
PPT
Chapter 7 Section 1.ppt
PPT
Chapter 1 Section 1.ppt
Chapter 2 Section 3.ppt
Chapter 4 Section 3.ppt
Chapter 3 Section 2.ppt
Chapter 2 Section 4.ppt
Chapter 6 Section 7.ppt
Chapter 4 Section 2.ppt
Chapter 2 Section 1.ppt
Chapter 3 Section 1.ppt
Chapter 6 Section 5.ppt
Chapter 4 Section 1.ppt
Chapter 4 Section 5.ppt
Chapter 6 Section 3.ppt
Chapter 6 Section 1.ppt
Chapter 5 Section (5).ppt
Chapter 5 Section (3).ppt
Chapter 1 Section 2.ppt
Chapter 6 Section 2.ppt
Chapter 2 Section 2.ppt
Chapter 7 Section 1.ppt
Chapter 1 Section 1.ppt
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PDF
O5-L3 Freight Transport Ops (International) V1.pdf
PPTX
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
PPTX
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PDF
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
PDF
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PDF
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
PPTX
master seminar digital applications in india
PDF
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
PPTX
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
PDF
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
PDF
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
PDF
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
PDF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
PPTX
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
O5-L3 Freight Transport Ops (International) V1.pdf
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
master seminar digital applications in india
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis

Chapter 9 Section 4.ppt

  • 1. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition and the Triola Statistics Series by Mario F. Triola
  • 2. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 9 Inferences from Two Samples 9-1 Review and Preview 9-2 Two Proportions 9-3 Two Means: Independent Samples 9-4 Two Dependent Samples (Matched Pairs) 9-5 Two Variances or Standard Deviations
  • 3. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Key Concept In this section we develop methods for testing hypotheses and constructing confidence intervals involving the mean of the differences of the values from two dependent populations. With dependent samples, there is some relationship where each value in one sample is paired with a corresponding value in the other sample.
  • 4. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Key Concept Because the hypothesis test and confidence interval use the same distribution and standard error, they are equivalent in the sense that they result in the same conclusions. Consequently, the null hypothesis that the mean difference equals 0 can be tested by determining whether the confidence interval includes 0. There are no exact procedures for dealing with dependent samples, but the t distribution serves as a reasonably good approximation, so the following methods are commonly used.
  • 5. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Dependent Samples Example – Matched pairs of heights of U.S. presidents and heights of their main opponents. Since there is a relationship as a basis for matching the pairs of data, this data consists of dependent samples. Height (cm) of President 189 173 183 180 179 Height (cm) of Main Opponent 170 185 175 180 178
  • 6. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Good Experimental Design When designing an experiment or planning an observational study, using dependent samples with paired data is generally better than using two independent samples. The advantage of using matched pairs is that we reduce extraneous variation, which could occur if each experimental unit were treated independently.
  • 7. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Notation for Dependent Samples d = individual difference between the two values of a single matched pair µd = mean value of the differences d for the population of all matched pairs of data = mean value of the differences d for the paired sample data sd = standard deviation of the differences d for the paired sample data n = number of pairs of sample data d
  • 8. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Requirements 1. The sample data are dependent. 2. The samples are simple random samples. 3. Either or both of these conditions is satisfied: The number of pairs of sample data is large ( n > 30) or the pairs of values have differences that are from a population having a distribution that is approximately normal.
  • 9. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. where degrees of freedom = n – 1 Hypothesis Test Statistic for Matched Pairs d d d t s n   
  • 10. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. P-values and Critical Values P-values: P-values are automatically provided by technology. If technology is not available, use Table A-3. Critical values: Use Table A-3 with degrees of freedom df = n – 1
  • 11. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Confidence Intervals for Matched Pairs Critical values of tα/2: Use Table A-3 with df = n – 1 degrees of freedom. d d E d E      / 2 d s E t n  
  • 12. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Example Use the sample data below with a significance level of 0.05 to test the claim that for the population of heights of presidents and their main opponents, the differences have a mean greater than 0 cm (so presidents tend to be taller than their opponents). Height (cm) of President 189 173 183 180 179 Height (cm) of Main Opponent 170 185 175 180 178 Difference d 19 -12 8 0 1
  • 13. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Example Requirement Check: 1. The samples are dependent because the values are paired. 2. The pairs of data are randomly selected. 3. The number of data points is 5, so normality should be checked (and it is assumed the condition is met).
  • 14. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Example Step 1: The claim is that µd > 0 cm. Step 2: If the original claim is not true, we have µd ≤ 0 cm. Step 3: The hypotheses can be written as: 0 0 : 0 cm : 0 cm d d H H    
  • 15. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Example Step 4: The significance level is α = 0.05. Step 5: We use the Student t distribution. The summary statistics are: 3.2 11.4 d s  
  • 16. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Example Step 6: Determine the value of the test statistic: with df = 5 – 1 = 4 3.2 0 0.628 11.4 5 d d d t s n      
  • 17. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Example Step 6: Using technology, the P-value is 0.282. Using the critical value method:
  • 18. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Example Step 7: Because the P-value exceeds 0.05, or because the test statistic does not fall in the critical region, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Conclusion: There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that for the population of heights of presidents and their main opponent, the differences have a mean greater than 0 cm. In other words, presidents do not appear to be taller than their opponents.
  • 19. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Example Confidence Interval: Support the conclusions with a 90% confidence interval estimate for µd. /2 11.4 2.132 10.8694 5 d s E t n     3.2 10.8694 3.2 10.8694 7.7 14.1 d d d d E d E              
  • 20. Section 9.4-‹#› Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Example We have 90% confidence that the limits of –7.7 cm and 14.1 cm contain the true value of the difference in height (president’s height – opponent’s height). See that the interval does contain the value of 0 cm, so it is very possible that the mean of the differences is equal to 0 cm, indicating that there is no significant difference between the heights.