COMP 4010 Lecture10 AR/VR Research Directions
4 likes2,400 views
The document discusses research directions in augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technologies, highlighting key technologies such as visual displays, tracking, and user interaction. It outlines future visions for VR and AR, including advancements in display technology and improvements in interaction methods, while emphasizing the need for research in collaborative VR systems and social acceptance. The document concludes by identifying multiple areas requiring further study, including VR/AR teleconferencing and easier content creation tools.
![Augmented Reality
• Defining Characteristics [Azuma 97]
• Combines Real andVirtual Images
• Both can be seen at the same time
• Interactive in real-time
• The virtual content can be interacted with
• Registered in 3D
• Virtual objects appear fixed in space
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence, 6(4), 355-385.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/lecture10-futureresearchslideshare-181208231607/85/COMP-4010-Lecture10-AR-VR-Research-Directions-6-320.jpg)
COMP 4010 Lecture10 AR/VR Research Directions
- 1. LECTURE 10: RESEARCH DIRECTIONS IN AR AND VR COMP 4010 – Virtual Reality Semester 5 – 2018 Bruce Thomas, Mark Billinghurst University of South Australia October 30th 2018
- 2. Key Technologies for VR Systems • Visual Display • Stimulate visual sense • Audio/Tactile Display • Stimulate hearing/touch • Tracking • Changing viewpoint • User input • Input Devices • Supporting user interaction
- 3. Many Directions for Research • Research in each of the key technology areas for VR • Display, input, tracking, graphics, etc. • Research in the phenomena of VR • Psychological experience of VR, measuring Presence, etc.. • Research in tools for VR • VR authoring tools, automatic world creation, etc. • Research in many application areas • Collaborative/social, virtual characters, medical, education, etc.
- 4. Future Visions of VR: Ready Player One • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiK2fhOY0nE
- 5. Today vs. Tomorrow VR in 2018 VR in 2045 Graphics High quality Photo-realistic Display 110-150 degrees Total immersion Interaction Handheld controller Full gesture/body/gaze Navigation Limited movement Natural Multiuser Few users Millions of users
- 6. Augmented Reality • Defining Characteristics [Azuma 97] • Combines Real andVirtual Images • Both can be seen at the same time • Interactive in real-time • The virtual content can be interacted with • Registered in 3D • Virtual objects appear fixed in space Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence, 6(4), 355-385.
- 7. Future Vision of AR: IronMan • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1TEK2Wf_e8
- 8. Key Enabling Technologies 1. Combines Real andVirtual Images Display Technology 2. Registered in 3D Tracking Technologies 3. Interactive in real-time InteractionTechnologies Future research can be done in each of these areas
- 9. DISPLAY
- 10. • Past • Bulky Head mounted displays • Current • Handheld, lightweight head mounted • Future • Projected AR • Wide FOV see through • Retinal displays • Contact lens Evolution in Displays
- 11. Wide FOV See-Through (3+ years) • Waveguide techniques • Wider FOV • Thin see through • Socially acceptable • Pinlight Displays • LCD panel + point light sources • 110 degree FOV • UNC/Nvidia Lumus DK40 Maimone, A., Lanman, D., Rathinavel, K., Keller, K., Luebke, D., & Fuchs, H. (2014). Pinlight displays: wide field of view augmented reality eyeglasses using defocused point light sources. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2014 Emerging Technologies (p. 20). ACM.
- 14. Retinal Displays (5+ years) • Photons scanned into eye • Infinite depth of field • Bright outdoor performance • Overcome visual defects • True 3D stereo with depth modulation • Microvision (1993-) • Head mounted monochrome • MagicLeap (2013-) • Projecting light field into eye
- 15. Contact Lens (10 – 15 + years) • Contact Lens only • Unobtrusive • Significant technical challenges • Power, data, resolution • Babak Parviz (2008) • Contact Lens + Micro-display • Wide FOV • socially acceptable • Innovega (innovega-inc.com) http://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/bionics/augmented-reality-in-a-contact-lens/
- 16. TRACKING
- 17. Evolution of Tracking • Past • Location based, marker based, • magnetic/mechanical • Present • Image based, hybrid tracking • Future • Ubiquitous • Model based • Environmental
- 18. Model Based Tracking (1-3 yrs) • Track from known 3D model • Use depth + colour information • Match input to model template • Use CAD model of targets • Recent innovations • Learn models online • Tracking from cluttered scene • Track from deformable objects Hinterstoisser, S., Lepetit, V., Ilic, S., Holzer, S., Bradski, G., Konolige, K., & Navab, N. (2013). Model based training, detection and pose estimation of texture-less 3D objects in heavily cluttered scenes. In Computer Vision–ACCV 2012 (pp. 548-562). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- 20. Environmental Tracking (3+ yrs) • Environment capture • Use depth sensors to capture scene & track from model • InifinitAM (www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~victor/infinitam/) • Real time scene capture on mobiles, dense or sparse capture • Dynamic memory swapping allows large environment capture • Cross platform, open source library available
- 22. Fusion4D (2016) • Shahram Izhadi (Microsoft + perceptiveIO) • Real capture and dynamic reconstruction • RGBD sensors + incremental reconstruction
- 24. Wide Area Outdoor Tracking (5+ yrs) • Process • Combine panorama’s into point cloud model (offline) • Initialize camera tracking from point cloud • Update pose by aligning camera image to point cloud • Accurate to 25 cm, 0.5 degree over very wide area Ventura, J., & Hollerer, T. (2012). Wide-area scene mapping for mobile visual tracking. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2012 IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 3-12). IEEE.
- 25. Wide Area Outdoor Tracking https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZNN0NeXV6s
- 26. Outdoor Localization using Maps • Use 2D building footprints and approximate height • Process • Sensor input for initial position orientation • Estimate camera orientation from straight line segments • Estimate camera translation from façade segmentation • Use pose estimate to initialise SLAM tracking • Results – 90% < 4m position error, < 3 o angular error Arth, C., Pirchheim, C., Ventura, J., Schmalstieg, D., & Lepetit, V. (2015). Instant outdoor localization and SLAM initialization from 2.5 D maps. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 21(11), 1309-1318.
- 28. INTERACTION
- 29. Evolution of Interaction • Past • Limited interaction • Viewpoint manipulation • Present • Screen based, simple gesture • tangible interaction • Future • Natural gesture, Multimodal • Intelligent Interfaces • Physiological/Sensor based
- 30. Natural Gesture (2-5 years) • Freehand gesture input • Depth sensors for gesture capture • Move beyond simple pointing • Rich two handed gestures • Eg Microsoft Research Hand Tracker • 3D hand tracking, 30 fps, single sensor • Commercial Systems • Meta, MS Hololens, Occulus, Intel, etc Sharp, T., Keskin, C., Robertson, D., Taylor, J., Shotton, J., Leichter, D. K. C. R. I., ... & Izadi, S. (2015, April). Accurate, Robust, and Flexible Real-time Hand Tracking. In Proc. CHI (Vol. 8).
- 32. Example: Eye Tracking Input • Smaller/cheaper eye-tracking systems • More HMDs with integrated eye-tracking • Research questions • How can eye gaze be used for interaction? • What interaction metaphors are natural? • What technology can be used for eye-tracking • Etc..
- 33. Eye Gaze Interaction Methods • Gaze for interaction • Implicit vs. explicit input • Exploring different gaze interaction • Duo reticles – use eye saccade input • Radial pursuit – use smooth pursuit motion • Nod and roll – use the vestibular ocular reflex • Hardware • HTC Vive + Pupil Labs integrated eye-tracking • User study to compare between methods for 3DUI Piumsomboon, T., Lee, G., Lindeman, R. W., & Billinghurst, M. (2017, March). Exploring natural eye-gaze-based interaction for immersive virtual reality. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), 2017 IEEE Symposium on (pp. 36-39). IEEE.
- 34. Duo-Reticles (DR) Inertial Reticle (IR) Real-time Reticle (RR) or Eye-gaze Reticle (original name) A-1 As RR and IR are aligned, alignment time counts down A-2 A-3 Selection completed
- 35. Radial Pursuit (RP) B-1 Real-time Reticle (RR) B-2 B-3 B-4 𝑑"#$ = min 𝑑), 𝑑+, … , 𝑑- , 𝑑# = ∑ |𝑝(𝑖)5 − 𝑝′5 |$ 5859:9;9<=
- 36. Nod and Roll (NR) 36 C-2 C-1 Head-gaze Reticle (HR) Real-time Reticle (RR) C-3
- 37. Demo: Eye gaze interaction methods https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpCGqxkmBKE
- 38. Multimodal Input (5+ years) • Combine gesture and speech input • Gesture good for qualitative input • Speech good for quantitative input • Support combined commands • “Put that there” + pointing • Eg HIT Lab NZ multimodal input • 3D hand tracking, speech • Multimodal fusion module • Complete tasks faster with MMI, less errors Billinghurst, M., Piumsomboon, T., & Bai, H. (2014). Hands in Space: Gesture Interaction with Augmented-Reality Interfaces. IEEE computer graphics and applications, (1), 77-80.
- 39. HIT Lab NZ Multimodal Input https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSsrzMxGwcA
- 40. Intelligent Interfaces (10+ years) • Move to Implicit Input vs. Explicit • Recognize user behaviour • Provide adaptive feedback • Support scaffolded learning • Move beyond check-lists of actions • Eg AR + Intelligent Tutoring • Constraint based ITS + AR • PC Assembly (Westerfield (2015) • 30% faster, 25% better retention Westerfield, G., Mitrovic, A., & Billinghurst, M. (2015). Intelligent Augmented Reality Training for Motherboard Assembly. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25(1), 157-172.
- 41. COLLABORATION
- 42. Collaborative VR Systems • Directions for research • Scalability – towards millions of users • Graphics – support for multiple different devices • User representation – realistic face/body input • Support for communication cues – messaging, recording, etc • Goal: Collaboration in VR as good/better than FtF Altspace VR Facebook Spaces
- 45. Crossing Boundaries Jun Rekimoto, Sony CSL
- 46. Invisible Interfaces Jun Rekimoto, Sony CSL
- 47. Milgram’s Reality-Virtuality continuum Mixed Reality Reality - Virtuality (RV) Continuum Real Environment Augmented Reality (AR) Augmented Virtuality (AV) Virtual Environment
- 48. The MagicBook Reality VirtualityAugmented Reality (AR) Augmented Virtuality (AV)
- 49. The MagicBook • Using AR to transition along Milgram’s continuum • Moving seamlessly from Reality to AR to VR • Support for Collaboration • Face to Face, Shared AR/VR, Multi-scale • Natural interaction • Handheld AR and VR viewer Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). The MagicBook: a transitional AR interface. Computers & Graphics, 25(5), 745-753.
- 51. Invisible Interfaces Jun Rekimoto, Sony CSL
- 52. Example: Visualizing Sensor Networks • Rauhala et. al. 2007 (Linkoping) • Network of Humidity Sensors • ZigBee wireless communication • Use Mobile AR toVisualize Humidity Rauhala, M., Gunnarsson, A. S., & Henrysson, A. (2006). A novel interface to sensor networks using handheld augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 8th conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services(pp. 145-148). ACM.
- 54. • Humidity information overlaid on real world shown in mobile AR
- 55. Invisible Interfaces Jun Rekimoto, Sony CSL
- 56. UbiVR – CAMAR CAMAR Companion CAMAR Viewer CAMAR Controller GIST - Korea
- 57. ubiHome @ GIST ÓubiHome What/When/How Where/When Media services Who/What/ When/How ubiKey Couch SensorPDA Tag-it Door Sensor ubiTrack When/HowWhen/HowWho/What/When/How Light service MR window
- 59. Example:SocialAcceptance • People don’t want to look silly • Only 12% of 4,600 adults would be willing to wear AR glasses • 20% of mobile AR browser users experience social issues • Acceptance more due to Social than Technical issues • Needs further study (ethnographic, field tests, longitudinal)
- 60. TATAugmented ID
- 64. CONCLUSIONS
- 65. Research Needed in Many Areas • Collaborative Experiences • VR/AR teleconferencing • Social Acceptance • Overcome social problems with AR/VR • Cloud Services • Cloud based storage/processing • Authoring Tools • Easy content creation for non-experts for AR/VR • Etc..