SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Cooperative Language Learning
Blessie Joe Mygel Baje
BACKGROUND
■ U.S. educator John Dewey is usually
credited with promoting the idea of
building cooperation in learning into
regular classrooms on a regular and
systematic basis.
■ Educators were concerned that
traditional models of classroom
learning were teacher-fronted, fostered
competition rather than cooperation,
and favored majority students.They
believed that minority students might
fall behind higher-achieving students
COLLABORATIVE LANGUAGE
LEARNING■ CLL is part of a more general instructional approach also
known as Collaborative Learning (CL)
■ Cooperative learning is group learning activity organized so
that learning is dependent on the socially structured
exchange of information between learners in groups and in
which each learner is held accountable for his or her own
learning and is motivated to increase the learning of others.
(Olsen and Kagan 1992:8)
■ It is an approach that makes maximum use of cooperative
activities involving pairs and small groups of learners in the
classroom.
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS
■ Raise of achievements of all students
■ Positive relationships among students
■ Experience on healthy social, psychological, and
cognitive development
■ Replace competition for cooperation
■ Replace teacher-fronted lessons for student-centered
■ Interactive pair and group activities
■ Development of learning and communication strategies
■ Reduce learner stress and create a positive affective
classroom climate
GOALS
■ To provide opportunities for naturalistic second
language acquisition through the use of
interactive pair and group activities
■ To provide teachers with a methodology to
enable them to achieve this goal and one that
can be applied in a variety of curriculum
settings (e.g., content-based, foreign language
classrooms)
GOALS
■ To enable focused attention to particular lexical
items, language structures, and communicative
functions through the use of interactive tasks
■ To provide opportunities for learners to develop
successful learning and communication strategies
■ To enhance learner motivation and reduce learner
stress and to create a positive affective classroom
climate
APPROACHE
S
■ Interactive and cooperative nature of language
■ Communication as a primary purpose of language
■ Most speech is organized as conversation
■ Communication takes place upon certain agreed-
upon set of cooperative rules
■ We learn these social rules in conversational
interaction
THEORY OF
LANGUAGE
■ Social interaction in learning: (Jean Piaget and
Vygotsky) by structure situation, interactive
structure, and Question Matrix (Bloom).
■ Development of critical thinking skills
■ Learning must emphasize on cooperation, not
on competition
■ Increase and variety of second language
practice
THEORY OF
LEARNING
■ Cognitive development and increased language
skills
■ Integration of language with content-based areas
■ Greater variety of materials to stimulate language
and concept learning
■ Mastering of professional skills that emphasize on
communication
■ Students act as resources of each other – a more
active role
THEORY OF
LEARNING
LEARNER ROLES
■ Work collaboratively on tasks with other group members.
■ Must learn teamwork skills.
■ Be directors of their learning (plan, monitor, and evaluate
their own learning)
■ Learning requires student’s direct and active involvement
and participation.
■ Alternate roles involve partners in the role of tutors,
checkers, recorders, and information sharers. “Pair tasks”
TEACHER ROLES
■ Create a highly structured and well organized
learning environment in the classroom:
– Setting goals, planning and structuring tasks,
establishing the physical arrangement of the
classroom, assigning students to groups and
roles, and selecting materials and time
(Johnson et al. 1994)
■ Be a facilitator of learning.
■ Move around the class and helping students and groups
as needs arise:
– During this time the teacher interacts, teaches,
refocuses, questions, clarifies, supports, expands,
celebrates, and empathizes.
– And facilitators are giving feedback, redirecting the
group with questions, encouraging the group to solve its
own problems, extending activity, encouraging thinking,
managing conflict, observing students, and supplying
resources. (Harel 1992: 169)
TEACHER ROLES
■ Teacher speaks less than in teacher fronted
class.
■ Provide broad questions to challenge thinking.
■ Prepare students for the task they will carry out.
■ Assist students with the learning tasks.
■ Give few commands, imposing less disciplinary
control (Harel 1992)
TEACHER ROLES
■ Restructuring lessons so that students can work
cooperatively. This involves the following steps
(Johnson et al. 1994: 9):
– Take your existing lessons, curriculum, and sources and
structure them cooperatively.
– Tailor cooperative learning lessons to your unique instructional
needs, circumstances, curricula, subject areas, and students.
– Diagnose the problems some students may have in working
together and intervene to increase learning groups’
effectiveness.
TEACHER ROLES
THE ROLE OF INSTRUCTIONAL
MATERIALS
■ Create opportunities for students to work
cooperatively.
E.g. If students are working in groups..
1. Each student might have a set of materials.
2. Groups might have different sets of materials.
3. Or, each member might need a copy of a text.
• Materials can be specially designed for CLL
learning, modified from existing materials, or
borrowed from other disciplines.
Procedure:
 Cooperative writing
 Editing pair
During the procedure
 Teacher’s role: he or she monitors the pairs or
group work
 Student’s role: active and cooperative
TYPES OF
LEARNING AND
TEACHING
ACTIVITIES
FORMAL
COOPERATIV
E LEARNING
GROUPS
These last from one
class period to several
weeks
Involve students
working together to
achieve shared learning
goals
INFORMAL
COOPERATIV
E LEARNING
GROUPS
These are adhoc groups
that last from a few
minutes to a class period.
To focus student
attention or to
facilitate learning
during direct teaching
COOPERATIV
E BASE
GROUPS
These are long term,
lasting for at least a year
and consist of
heterogeneous learning
groups with stable
membership
To allow members to give
each other the support,
help, encouragement, and
assistance they need to
succeed academically
K
E
Y
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
S
Positive Interdependence
Group Formation
Individual Accountability
Social Skills
Structuring and Structures
POSITIVE INTERDEPENDENCE
■ This occurs when group members feel that what helps one
member helps all and what hurts one member hurts all. It
is created by the structure of CL tasks and by
GROUP FORMATION
Factors involved in setting up groups:
 Deciding on the size of the group
 Assigning students to groups
 Student roles in groups
■ Everyone must learn the information, so everyone
can contribute to the project.
■ Group grade and individual grade.
– Group is graded on project.
– Individuals are graded on how well they perform
their role, responsibilities and know the information.
– Everyone has a job to do.
INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY
STRUCTURING AND STRUCTURES
■ This determines the way students interact with each
other as teammates.
SOCIAL SKILLS
■ This refer to ways of organizing student interaction
and different ways students are to interact such as
Three-step interview or Round Robin.
THREE MAJOR LEARNING
TASKS1. Team practice from common input
 skills development and mastery of facts
2. Jigsaw: differentiated but predetermined input
 evaluation and synthesis of facts and opinions
 Current communicative approaches
3. Cooperative projects: topics/resources selected by
students
 discovery learning
EXAMPLES OF CLL ACTIVITIES
(OLSEN & KAGAN)
■ Three- step interview:
1. Students are in pairs; one is interviewer and the other is
interviewee.
2. Students reverse roles.
3. Each shares with team member what was learned during the
two interviews.
■ Roundtable (Round Robin)There is one piece of paper and one
pen for each team.One student makes a contribution and
passes the paper and pen to the student of his or her left. Each
students makes contributions in turn.
■ Think- Pair- Share:Teacher poses a question. Students think of a
response. Students discuss their responses with a partner. Students
share their partner’s response with the class
■ Solve – Pair – Share: teacher poses a problem. Students work out
solutions individually. Students explain how they solved the problem
in interview or Round Robin structures
■ Numbered Heads: Students number off in teams.Teacher asks a
question. HeadsTogether – students literally put their heads together
and make sure everyone knows and can explain the answer.Teacher
calls a number and students with that number raise their hands to be
called on, as in traditional classroom.
EXAMPLES OF CLL ACTIVITIES
(OLSEN & KAGAN)
CONCLUSION
■ In Cooperative Learning, group activities are the
major mode of learning and are part of a
comprehensive theory and system for the use of
group work in teaching.
■ Group activities are carefully planned to maximize
students’ interaction and to facilitate students’
contributions to each other’s learning.
■ Proponents of CLL stress that it enhances both
learning and learners’ interaction skills.
Cooperative Language Learning

More Related Content

PPTX
Cooperative Language Learning
PPTX
Cooperative learning and some kagan structures
PPTX
Grammar translation method
PPTX
Introduction to sosiolinguistics
PDF
kagan-structures new.pdf
PPTX
Cooperative language learning
PPTX
Genre Based Approach
PPTX
Neurolinguistics
Cooperative Language Learning
Cooperative learning and some kagan structures
Grammar translation method
Introduction to sosiolinguistics
kagan-structures new.pdf
Cooperative language learning
Genre Based Approach
Neurolinguistics

What's hot (20)

PPTX
What is CLT?
PPTX
Competency-based language teaching
PPTX
Approaches & Methods in Language Teaching
PPTX
Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)
PPTX
The Post-Method era
PPTX
Communicative language teaching
PPTX
Communicative language teaching
PPTX
LEXICAL APPROACH
PPTX
The audio lingual method
PPTX
Content based instruction
PPTX
Audio lingual method
PPT
Desuggestopedia
PPTX
COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING
PPTX
Direct method
PPTX
Communicative language teaching
PPTX
The post method era
PPTX
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)
PPTX
The oral approach and situational language teaching
PPTX
Second Language Acquisition 631
PPTX
Competency based language teaching - approach and design
What is CLT?
Competency-based language teaching
Approaches & Methods in Language Teaching
Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)
The Post-Method era
Communicative language teaching
Communicative language teaching
LEXICAL APPROACH
The audio lingual method
Content based instruction
Audio lingual method
Desuggestopedia
COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING
Direct method
Communicative language teaching
The post method era
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)
The oral approach and situational language teaching
Second Language Acquisition 631
Competency based language teaching - approach and design
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Cooperative language learning
PPT
Cooperative Language Learning Approach
PPTX
Cooperative language learning
PPTX
Cooperative Language Learning-group I
PPTX
Cooperative Learning
PPTX
Cooperative language learning
PPT
Cooperative Learning
PPTX
Integrating Technology Into The Classroom
PPTX
Cooperative Language Learning
PPTX
TEFL - Cooperative Language Learning
PPT
TEFL - Cooperative Language Learning Teaching (2)
PPTX
Lexical approach
PPT
TEACHING APROACHES method
PPT
Lexical Approach To Second Language Teaching
PPT
The Natural Approach
PPT
Lexical approach Presentation
PPT
Lexical approach
PPT
Natural approach.pptx
PPTX
Cooperative Learning
Cooperative language learning
Cooperative Language Learning Approach
Cooperative language learning
Cooperative Language Learning-group I
Cooperative Learning
Cooperative language learning
Cooperative Learning
Integrating Technology Into The Classroom
Cooperative Language Learning
TEFL - Cooperative Language Learning
TEFL - Cooperative Language Learning Teaching (2)
Lexical approach
TEACHING APROACHES method
Lexical Approach To Second Language Teaching
The Natural Approach
Lexical approach Presentation
Lexical approach
Natural approach.pptx
Cooperative Learning
Ad

Similar to Cooperative Language Learning (20)

PPTX
collaborative-lang.-learning.pptx
PPTX
Collaborative learning
PPTX
COOPERATIVE LEARNING STRATEGY
PPT
cooperative learning Nalibaeva.ppt
PPT
Collaboration and co teaching strategies for effective classroom practice
PDF
teaching-strategies1.pdf
PPT
What is cooperating learning.ppt
PPT
Cooplearning mod
PPT
Cooperative Learning in Special Education
PPT
Co Operative Learning
PPTX
PROBLEM BASED LEARNING :student centered instructional strategies.pptx
PPT
Collaborative learning (1)
PPT
Collaborative learning inset
PPTX
Cooperative learning
PPTX
Classroom Management in overcrowded situations.pptx
PPT
Faculty of Economics Trisakti University - Problem Based Learning (7 Jump Step)
PDF
Collaboration.richmond.elem 2013 rt
PPT
Peer To Peer Learning 10 7 09f1
PPTX
Coteaching model1 nolan_eng
PPTX
Cooperative Learning a Beginning
collaborative-lang.-learning.pptx
Collaborative learning
COOPERATIVE LEARNING STRATEGY
cooperative learning Nalibaeva.ppt
Collaboration and co teaching strategies for effective classroom practice
teaching-strategies1.pdf
What is cooperating learning.ppt
Cooplearning mod
Cooperative Learning in Special Education
Co Operative Learning
PROBLEM BASED LEARNING :student centered instructional strategies.pptx
Collaborative learning (1)
Collaborative learning inset
Cooperative learning
Classroom Management in overcrowded situations.pptx
Faculty of Economics Trisakti University - Problem Based Learning (7 Jump Step)
Collaboration.richmond.elem 2013 rt
Peer To Peer Learning 10 7 09f1
Coteaching model1 nolan_eng
Cooperative Learning a Beginning

More from BeeJay Baje (16)

PPTX
Weary Heart By Jose Del Castillo
PPTX
The Sea by Natividad Mrquez
PPTX
Air Castles
PPTX
Confucianism
PPTX
Inductive Method
PPTX
Grammar translation approach
PPTX
Grammar translation activity
PPTX
Cognitive Theory
PPTX
Wastong Gamit ng Salita
PPTX
Vocabulary
PPTX
Syllabics
PPTX
Stress
PPTX
Kinds of Sentences
PPTX
Content-Based and Immersion Models for ESL and EFL Language Teaching
PPTX
Cognitive Strategies & Context Clues
PPTX
Agencies of Socialization
Weary Heart By Jose Del Castillo
The Sea by Natividad Mrquez
Air Castles
Confucianism
Inductive Method
Grammar translation approach
Grammar translation activity
Cognitive Theory
Wastong Gamit ng Salita
Vocabulary
Syllabics
Stress
Kinds of Sentences
Content-Based and Immersion Models for ESL and EFL Language Teaching
Cognitive Strategies & Context Clues
Agencies of Socialization

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
PPTX
Institutional Correction lecture only . . .
PDF
Business Ethics Teaching Materials for college
PPTX
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
PPTX
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
Renaissance Architecture: A Journey from Faith to Humanism
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
Abdominal Access Techniques with Prof. Dr. R K Mishra
PDF
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
PPTX
BOWEL ELIMINATION FACTORS AFFECTING AND TYPES
PDF
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
PDF
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
PDF
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
PDF
Physiotherapy_for_Respiratory_and_Cardiac_Problems WEBBER.pdf
PPTX
Week 4 Term 3 Study Techniques revisited.pptx
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
PPTX
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
PDF
Origin of periodic table-Mendeleev’s Periodic-Modern Periodic table
PPTX
master seminar digital applications in india
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
Institutional Correction lecture only . . .
Business Ethics Teaching Materials for college
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Renaissance Architecture: A Journey from Faith to Humanism
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
Abdominal Access Techniques with Prof. Dr. R K Mishra
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
BOWEL ELIMINATION FACTORS AFFECTING AND TYPES
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
Physiotherapy_for_Respiratory_and_Cardiac_Problems WEBBER.pdf
Week 4 Term 3 Study Techniques revisited.pptx
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
Origin of periodic table-Mendeleev’s Periodic-Modern Periodic table
master seminar digital applications in india

Cooperative Language Learning

  • 3. BACKGROUND ■ U.S. educator John Dewey is usually credited with promoting the idea of building cooperation in learning into regular classrooms on a regular and systematic basis. ■ Educators were concerned that traditional models of classroom learning were teacher-fronted, fostered competition rather than cooperation, and favored majority students.They believed that minority students might fall behind higher-achieving students
  • 4. COLLABORATIVE LANGUAGE LEARNING■ CLL is part of a more general instructional approach also known as Collaborative Learning (CL) ■ Cooperative learning is group learning activity organized so that learning is dependent on the socially structured exchange of information between learners in groups and in which each learner is held accountable for his or her own learning and is motivated to increase the learning of others. (Olsen and Kagan 1992:8) ■ It is an approach that makes maximum use of cooperative activities involving pairs and small groups of learners in the classroom.
  • 5. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS ■ Raise of achievements of all students ■ Positive relationships among students ■ Experience on healthy social, psychological, and cognitive development ■ Replace competition for cooperation ■ Replace teacher-fronted lessons for student-centered ■ Interactive pair and group activities ■ Development of learning and communication strategies ■ Reduce learner stress and create a positive affective classroom climate
  • 6. GOALS ■ To provide opportunities for naturalistic second language acquisition through the use of interactive pair and group activities ■ To provide teachers with a methodology to enable them to achieve this goal and one that can be applied in a variety of curriculum settings (e.g., content-based, foreign language classrooms)
  • 7. GOALS ■ To enable focused attention to particular lexical items, language structures, and communicative functions through the use of interactive tasks ■ To provide opportunities for learners to develop successful learning and communication strategies ■ To enhance learner motivation and reduce learner stress and to create a positive affective classroom climate
  • 9. ■ Interactive and cooperative nature of language ■ Communication as a primary purpose of language ■ Most speech is organized as conversation ■ Communication takes place upon certain agreed- upon set of cooperative rules ■ We learn these social rules in conversational interaction THEORY OF LANGUAGE
  • 10. ■ Social interaction in learning: (Jean Piaget and Vygotsky) by structure situation, interactive structure, and Question Matrix (Bloom). ■ Development of critical thinking skills ■ Learning must emphasize on cooperation, not on competition ■ Increase and variety of second language practice THEORY OF LEARNING
  • 11. ■ Cognitive development and increased language skills ■ Integration of language with content-based areas ■ Greater variety of materials to stimulate language and concept learning ■ Mastering of professional skills that emphasize on communication ■ Students act as resources of each other – a more active role THEORY OF LEARNING
  • 12. LEARNER ROLES ■ Work collaboratively on tasks with other group members. ■ Must learn teamwork skills. ■ Be directors of their learning (plan, monitor, and evaluate their own learning) ■ Learning requires student’s direct and active involvement and participation. ■ Alternate roles involve partners in the role of tutors, checkers, recorders, and information sharers. “Pair tasks”
  • 13. TEACHER ROLES ■ Create a highly structured and well organized learning environment in the classroom: – Setting goals, planning and structuring tasks, establishing the physical arrangement of the classroom, assigning students to groups and roles, and selecting materials and time (Johnson et al. 1994) ■ Be a facilitator of learning.
  • 14. ■ Move around the class and helping students and groups as needs arise: – During this time the teacher interacts, teaches, refocuses, questions, clarifies, supports, expands, celebrates, and empathizes. – And facilitators are giving feedback, redirecting the group with questions, encouraging the group to solve its own problems, extending activity, encouraging thinking, managing conflict, observing students, and supplying resources. (Harel 1992: 169) TEACHER ROLES
  • 15. ■ Teacher speaks less than in teacher fronted class. ■ Provide broad questions to challenge thinking. ■ Prepare students for the task they will carry out. ■ Assist students with the learning tasks. ■ Give few commands, imposing less disciplinary control (Harel 1992) TEACHER ROLES
  • 16. ■ Restructuring lessons so that students can work cooperatively. This involves the following steps (Johnson et al. 1994: 9): – Take your existing lessons, curriculum, and sources and structure them cooperatively. – Tailor cooperative learning lessons to your unique instructional needs, circumstances, curricula, subject areas, and students. – Diagnose the problems some students may have in working together and intervene to increase learning groups’ effectiveness. TEACHER ROLES
  • 17. THE ROLE OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS ■ Create opportunities for students to work cooperatively. E.g. If students are working in groups.. 1. Each student might have a set of materials. 2. Groups might have different sets of materials. 3. Or, each member might need a copy of a text. • Materials can be specially designed for CLL learning, modified from existing materials, or borrowed from other disciplines.
  • 18. Procedure:  Cooperative writing  Editing pair During the procedure  Teacher’s role: he or she monitors the pairs or group work  Student’s role: active and cooperative
  • 20. FORMAL COOPERATIV E LEARNING GROUPS These last from one class period to several weeks Involve students working together to achieve shared learning goals INFORMAL COOPERATIV E LEARNING GROUPS These are adhoc groups that last from a few minutes to a class period. To focus student attention or to facilitate learning during direct teaching COOPERATIV E BASE GROUPS These are long term, lasting for at least a year and consist of heterogeneous learning groups with stable membership To allow members to give each other the support, help, encouragement, and assistance they need to succeed academically
  • 21. K E Y E L E M E N T S Positive Interdependence Group Formation Individual Accountability Social Skills Structuring and Structures
  • 22. POSITIVE INTERDEPENDENCE ■ This occurs when group members feel that what helps one member helps all and what hurts one member hurts all. It is created by the structure of CL tasks and by GROUP FORMATION Factors involved in setting up groups:  Deciding on the size of the group  Assigning students to groups  Student roles in groups
  • 23. ■ Everyone must learn the information, so everyone can contribute to the project. ■ Group grade and individual grade. – Group is graded on project. – Individuals are graded on how well they perform their role, responsibilities and know the information. – Everyone has a job to do. INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY
  • 24. STRUCTURING AND STRUCTURES ■ This determines the way students interact with each other as teammates. SOCIAL SKILLS ■ This refer to ways of organizing student interaction and different ways students are to interact such as Three-step interview or Round Robin.
  • 25. THREE MAJOR LEARNING TASKS1. Team practice from common input  skills development and mastery of facts 2. Jigsaw: differentiated but predetermined input  evaluation and synthesis of facts and opinions  Current communicative approaches 3. Cooperative projects: topics/resources selected by students  discovery learning
  • 26. EXAMPLES OF CLL ACTIVITIES (OLSEN & KAGAN) ■ Three- step interview: 1. Students are in pairs; one is interviewer and the other is interviewee. 2. Students reverse roles. 3. Each shares with team member what was learned during the two interviews. ■ Roundtable (Round Robin)There is one piece of paper and one pen for each team.One student makes a contribution and passes the paper and pen to the student of his or her left. Each students makes contributions in turn.
  • 27. ■ Think- Pair- Share:Teacher poses a question. Students think of a response. Students discuss their responses with a partner. Students share their partner’s response with the class ■ Solve – Pair – Share: teacher poses a problem. Students work out solutions individually. Students explain how they solved the problem in interview or Round Robin structures ■ Numbered Heads: Students number off in teams.Teacher asks a question. HeadsTogether – students literally put their heads together and make sure everyone knows and can explain the answer.Teacher calls a number and students with that number raise their hands to be called on, as in traditional classroom. EXAMPLES OF CLL ACTIVITIES (OLSEN & KAGAN)
  • 28. CONCLUSION ■ In Cooperative Learning, group activities are the major mode of learning and are part of a comprehensive theory and system for the use of group work in teaching. ■ Group activities are carefully planned to maximize students’ interaction and to facilitate students’ contributions to each other’s learning. ■ Proponents of CLL stress that it enhances both learning and learners’ interaction skills.

Editor's Notes

  • #4: John Dewey (Building cooperation in learning into regular classrooms on a regular and systematic basis) It was more generally promoted and developed in the United States in the 1960’s and 1970’s as a response to the forced integration of public schools.
  • #5: In second language teaching, CLL has been embraced as a way of promoting communicative interaction in the classroom and is seen as an extension of the principles of Communicative Language Teaching. It is viewed as a learner-centered approach to teaching held to offer advantages over teacher-fronted classroom methods. build positive relationship teacher-students. give students experiences for different types of development. raise achivements to all students promote communicative interaction in the classroom
  • #6: Cooperative learning is where teams of students, with various abilities and skills, work together on different activities to learn about a subject. Groups will stay together for weeks, months or years. Groups should be 2-5 people in size.
  • #7: COOPERATION”, WORKING TOGETHER TO SHARE GOALS. LEARNERS WORK TOGETHER TO MAXIMIZE THEIR OWN AND EACH OTHER’S LEARNING.
  • #8: Objectives: To develop critical thinking skills and to develop communicative competence through socially structured interaction activities. 
  • #9: Cooperative Language Learning is founded on some basic premises about the interactive/cooperative nature of language and language learning.
  • #10: Premise 1: We are born to talk. (Communication is the primary purpose of language) Premise 2: Most talk is conversation. Premise 3: Conversation is based on rules/ maxims. Premise 4: One learns how these maxims are realized in L1 through casual everyday conversational interactions.
  • #11: Cooperative learning advocates on the theoretical work of developmental psychologists Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky. A central premise of CLL is that learners develop communicative competence in a language by conversing in socially or pedagogically structured situations. CLL also seeks to develop learners’ critical thinking skills. Integrating the teaching of critical thinking (Question Matrix) Devising the taxonomy of educational objectives One approach to integrating the teaching of critical thinking adopted by CLL advocates is called the Question Matrix (Wiederhold 1995). Wiederhold has developed a battery of cooperative activities built on the matrix that encourages learners to ask and respond to a deeper array of alternative question types. (The matrix is based on the well-known Taxonomy of Educational Objectives devised by Bloom, which assumes a hierarchy of learning objectives ranging from simple recall of information to forming conceptual judgments.)
  • #21: 1. one period to several weeks. (Specific task involve students working together to achieve share learning goal). Group assignment, Group projects, and some other similar tasks. 2. a few minutes to a class period (facilitate the direct teaching) Role play, Group Discussion. Overall, activities in one class session. 3. at least one year. Support each other to achieve academic goal
  • #22: Elements of Successful Group-Based Learning in CL (Olsen and Kagan) Achieving the successful group-based learning in CLKey
  • #23: Positive interdependence means you need each other to complete your task. fail one fail all, mutual support. Example, single product like score. Deciding on the size of the group: this will depend on the tasks they have to carry out, the age of the learners, and time limits for the lesson. Typical group size is from two to four. Assigning students to groups: Groups can be teacher-selected, random, or student-selected. Teacher selected is recommended. Student roles in groups: Each group member has a specific role to play in a group, such as noise monitor, turn-taker monitor, recorder, or summarizer.
  • #24: This involves both individual and group performance.
  • #25: Three-step interview: Students are in pairs; one is interviewer and one is interviewee. 2. Students reverse roles Each shares with team member what was learned during the two interviews.
  • #26: TEAM PRACTICE All students work on the same material. The task is to make sure that everyone in the group knows the answer to a question and can explain how the answer was obteined. This technique is good for review and for practice tests; The group takes the practice test together, but each student will eventually d25o an assignment or take a test individually. This technique is effective in situations where the composition of the groups is unstable. Students can form new groups every day Jigzaw Each group member receives a different piece of the information. Students regroup in topic groups (expert groups) composed of people with the same piece to master the material and prepare to teach it. Students synthesize the information through discussion. Each student produces an assignment of part of a group project. This method of organization may require team-building activities for both home groups and topic groups, long term group involvement, and rehearsal of presentation methods. This method is very useful in the multilevel class, allowing for both homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping in terms of English proficiency. COOPERATIVE Topics may be different for each group. Students identify subtopics for each member. Steering commitee may coordinate the work of the class as a whole. Students research the information using resources such as library reference, interviews, visual media, internet. Students synthesize their innformation for a group presentation Each group presents to the whole class.
  • #29: CLL improves both learning and learners interaction skills CLL activities can be used in collaboration with other teaching methods and approaches. CLL helps the teacher build positive relationships amone students