curriculum-development1.ppt

THE NATURE AND SCOPE
OF CURRICULUM
DEVELOPMENT
(PHILIPPINE CONTEXT)
BY:
PROF. RONNIE ESPERGAL PASIGUI

Definitions of Curriculum
• Some authors define curriculum as the total
effort of the school to bring about desired
outcomes in school and out-of-school
situations.
• It is also defined as a sequence of potential
experiences set up in school for the purpose of
disciplining children and youth in group ways of
thinking and acting.

Definition(s) of Curriculum
• Curriculum – is a structured set of
learning outcomes or task that
educators usually call goals and
objectives. ( Howell and Evans 1995)
• Curriculum – is the “what” of teaching.
• Curriculum – listings of subjects to be
taught in school.

CURRICULUM
• A document which describes a structured series
of learning objectives and outcomes for a given
subject matter area
• Includes a specification of what should be
learned, how it should be taught, and the plan
for implementing/assessing the learning

Curriculum Planning
• A curriculum Plan is the advance
arrangement of learning opportunities for a
particular population of learners.
• A Curriculum guide is a written curriculum.

Curriculum Planning
• A Curriculum Planning is the process
whereby the arrangement of curriculum plans
or learning opportunities are created.

Curriculum Planning
• It is the process of preparing for the duties of
teaching, deciding upon goals and
emphases, determining curriculum content,
selecting learning resources and classroom
procedures, evaluating progress, and looking
toward next steps.

Curriculum Development
• It is defined as the process of selecting,
organizing, executing, and evaluating
learning experiences on the basis of the
needs, abilities and interests of the learners
and the nature of the society or community.

Curriculum Laboratory
• Curriculum laboratory is a place or workshop
where curriculum materials are gathered or
used by teachers or learners of curriculum.
• Resource Unit is a collection or suggested
learning activities and materials organized
around a given topic or area which a teacher
might utilize in planning, developing, and
evaluating a learning unit.

TWO SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT ON
CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT

Two Schools of Thought Predominated
Throughout History of Curriculum
Development:
• The Essentialist School
• The Progressive School

The Essentialist School
• It considers the curriculum as something rigid
consisting of discipline subjects.
• It considers all learners as much as the same
and it aims to fit the learner into the existing
social order and thereby maintain the status
quo
• Its major motivation is discipline and considers
freedom as an outcome and not a means of
education.

• Its approach is authoritative and the
teacher’s role is to assign lessons and to
recite recitations.
• It is book-centered and the methods
recommended are memory work , mastery of
facts and skills, and development of abstract
intelligence.

• It has no interest in social action and life
activities.
• Its measurement of outcomes are standard
tests based on subject matter mastery.

Traditional Points of View of Curriculum
• Body of subjects or subject matter prepared
by the teachers for the students to learn.
• Synonymous to “course study”.
• “Permanent studies” where the rule of
grammar, reading, rhetoric, logic and
mathematics for basic education
emphasized.(Hutchins)
• Most of the traditional ideas view curriculum
as written documents or plan of action in
accomplishing goals.

The Progressive School
• It conceives of the curriculum as something
flexible based on areas of interest.
• It is learner-centered, having in mind that no
two persons are alike.
• Its factor of motivation is individual
achievement believing that persons are
naturally good.

• The Role of the teacher is to stimulate direct
learning process.
• It uses a life experience approach to fit the
student for future social life.

• Constant revision of aims and experimental
techniques of teaching and learning are
imperatives in curriculum development in
order to create independent thinking,
initiative, self-reliance, individuality, self-
expression and activity in the elarner.

• Its measurement of outcomes are now
devices taking into consideration subject
matter and personality values.

Progressive Points of View of Curriculum
• Listing of subjects, syllabi, course of study and
list of courses or specific discipline can only be
called curriculum if these written materials are
actualized by the learner.
• Total learning experiences of the individual.
• All experiences children have under the
guidance of teachers. – Caswell & Campbell
• Experiences in the classroom which are planned
and enacted by the teacher, and also learned by
the students. – Marsh and Willis

Different Theories
• Conflicting philosophies of education have influenced
curriculum principles and practices.
• A NUMBER OF “self-evident educational truths” in the
past are now seen to be rather educational myths; such
as teachers know, children or learners don’t; all learners
should be treated alike.

Different Theories
• The fundamental concepts of some curricula have
changed.
• In many areas, new methodologies: programmed
instruction, Computer Assisted Instruction, Tutorials,
Large and Small Group Instruction, and a variety of
individualized instruction procedures have been
developed.

Different Emphases
• There is the curricular emphasis on the subject
matter for the mind, with priority in value to literature,
intellectual history, ideas of religion, philosophy,
studies.
• There is the curricular emphasis on the observable
facts, the world of things.

Different Emphases
• Another curricular emphasis is the school’s
dependence on Scholasticism,
• Another curriculum stresses the importance of
experience – process.

Different Emphasis
• A recent curricular emphasis is that of existing
choice.
• The learner must learn skills, acquire knowledge,
and make decisions.

Ralph Tyler Model: Four Basic Principle
1. Purposes of the school
2. Educational experiences related to the
purpose
3. Organization of the experiences
4. Evaluation of the experiences

Hilda Taba : Grassroots Approach
1. Diagnosis of learners needs and
expectations of the larger society.
2. Formulation of learning objectives.
3. Selection of the learning content.
4. Organization of learning content.
5. Selection of the learning experiences.
6. Organization of learning activities.
7. Determination of what to evaluate and the
means of doing it.

Steps in Curriculum
Development
•Tyler’s Questions of Curriculum
Development will provide 4 steps:
•What educational purposes should the
school seek to attain?
•What educational experiences can be
provided that are likely to attain these
purposes?
•How can these educational experiences
be effectively organised?
•How can we determine whether these
purposes are being attained?

Steps...
• In answering Tyler’s questions, we arrive the following
basic steps of curriculum development:
• Selection of aims, goals and objectives;
• Selection of learning experiences and content;
• Organisation of learning experiences; and
• Evaluation of the extent to which the objectives have
been achieved.
• The 4 steps above are basic, because they can be more
than 4

1
• Selection of Aims
2
• Selection of Content &
Learning Experiences
3
• Organizsation of
content & Learning
Experiences
4
• Evaluation of Learning
outcomes
• Some curriculum
experts like Tyler say
that the steps are
followed in a sequence
or a straight line.
• This model that
assumes that
curriculum decision
making follows a
straight line is called
linear model

• Other scholars argue that
curriculum decision making
is not a simple linear
process that necessarily
starts with aims.
• One of them is Wheeler
(1978) who believes that
curriculum decision making
can start from any point and
can come back to any of the
points e.g. like a cycle
Aims, Goals
& Objectives
Selection of
Learning
Experiences
Selection of
Content
Organisation &
Integration of
Learning
Experiences &
Content
Evaluation

• Kerr (1968) also
believes that curriculum
process is a very
comlex set of activities
and decisions and they
interact a lot.
• Changes made in
content may
necessitate changes in
experiences, which
may again bring about
changes in evaluation
etc.
Objective
Content
Learning
Experience
Evaluation

Selection of Aims and Objectives
• Every curriculum is aimed at developing in the learners
certain competencies or abilities. The curriculum process
must therefore clearly identify the aims that the curriculum is
intended to achieve.
• Curriculum aims range from the very broad to the more
specific. In fact, that is why we use the terms aims, goals and
objectives to refer to them. Aims are broad statements which
cover all of the experiences provided in the curriculum; goals
are tied to specific subjects or group of contents within the
curriculum; while objectives describe the more specific
outcomes that can be attained as a result of lessons or
instruction delivered at the classroom.

Factors in Selecting Aims
• Analysis of our culture: we should take into account our cultural values,
norms and expectations when selecting aims,
• The present status of the learner: what has the learner already known?
What are his/her characteristics? What is he/she ready for?
• The state of our knowledge of the subject matter or content: We should
examine new developments in knowledge to see if they contain things
that are of real value to the learner and society.
• Relevance to school’s philosophy of education: each nation has its own
philosophy of education which its schools try to implement. Nigeria’s
philosophy of education is contained in its National Policy on Education.
We should ask whether the objectives we select are relevant to this
philosophy;
• Consistency with our theory of learning: at any time in any society, there
is a dominant conception of learning i.e. our understanding what
learning is and how it takes place. For instance, the National Policy on
Education anticipates that the Nigerian child is active, exploratory and
imaginative.

Selection of Content & Learning
Experiences
• Content is what we teach; learning experience is an activity
which the learner engages in which results in changes in his
behaviour;
• We should select those contents and learning experiences that
will in attaining the goals of the curriculum;
• There are some factors to consider in selecting both learning
experiences and content.
• We shall first examine those criteria for selecting learning
experiences

Factors in Selecting Learning
Experiences
• Validity: this refers to the relevance of the stated
learning experience to the stated goals of the
curriculum;
• Relevance to life: learning experience must be
related to the learner’s real life situations in and out
of school;
• Variety: learning experiences must cater to the
needs of different types of learners by providing
different types of experiences;
• Suitability: learning experiences must be suitable to
the learners present state of learning and
characteristics:

Selection of learning experiences…
• Cumulation: even though experiences provided may
be different, they should all lead to the attainment of
the same goal; subsequent experiences should build
on earlier ones;
• Multiple Learning: a single learning experience may
bring about multiple outcomes. Such learning
experiences are important because of their multiple
benefits.

Factors in Selecting Content
• Validity: means two things, is the content related to the
objectives, and is the content true or authentic;
• Significance: is the content significant or will lead it to the
more mastery or more understanding of the course or
subject;
• Utility: here the question is whether the content selected is
useful i.e. will lead to the acquisition of skills and
knowledge that are considered useful by society?
• Interest: is the content interesting to the learner? Or can
the content be made interesting to learners?
• Learnability: is the content selected such that learners can
learn and understand given their present level/

Curriculum Development in the Philippines
• Touched on the religion, economic, political, and social
influences and events that took place in the country.
• Colonial rules in the Philippines tailored the curriculum
to serve colonial goals and objectives.

The Need for Curriculum Framework
• What learning objectives should be included?
• What will be the bases for the choice of objectives?
• Will the choice be based on the learners’ needs and
interests, or rather on the needs of the society?
• Will the selection depend on tradition, the nature of
knowledge, or the learners’ characteristics?
• What philosophical and psychological theories regarding
the nature of learners as well as the learning process will
underpin the organization of the content?
• Will the choice of methodology be in line with accepted
teaching-learning principles?
• Will the evaluation procedure be able to measure the
learning that is taking place?

The result of lack of Framework
• Sari-sari (hodgepodge)
• Pira-piraso (piemal)
• Tagpi-tagpi (patchwork)
• Sabog (lack of focus)
• Malabo (vague)
• Lakas ng kutob (gutfeel)
• Hula-hula (hunches)
• Gaya-gaya (patterned from an existing model)
• Bahala na (by chance)
• Patama-tama (non-deliberate)

The Areas of Concern
• Cultural Values
• Knowledge of Learner
• Knowledge Of Teaching-Learning Theories
and Principles
• Body of Knowledge

Cultural Values
Visible
• Rules
• Food
• Dress
• Language
• Music
• Dance
• Means of Livelihood
• Political Behavior
• Family
• Community Norms
Non-Visible
• Philosophy
• Beliefs
• Value System

Knowledge of the Learner
• Program for
Decentralized
Educational
Development
(PRODED) - Content
Based (not on the
learner and learning
process)
• The Basic Education
Curriculum (BEC) and
Secondary Education
Development Program
(SEDP) – addresses
the learner and learning
process

Determinants of Learning in Philippines
• Educational
Development Project
Implementing Task
Force(EDPITAF) –
revealed that
community and home
variables have greater
impact on learning than
school factors.
Factors:
• Use of electricity
• Parental education
• Parents’ perception of
academic abilities and
interests of the children
• Parents’ attitude
• Geography (Region)
• School Type
• Socio economic status
of the Family

Knowledge of Teaching-Learning
Principles
• Behaviorism
• Cognitive
Development
Psychology
• Cognitive Field
Psychology
The New Elementary School
Curriculum (NESC) and New
Secondary Education
Curriculum (NSEC) -
demonstrate ample evidence
of the inclusion of behaviorist
psychological principles
through the use of behavioral
objectives, drills, practices,
and homeworks reinforces
learning.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT
• Before 1521 – Education before the coming of the
Spaniards
• 1521-1896 –Education during the Spanish Regime
• 1896 -1898 – Education during Philippine Revolution
• 1899 – 1935 – Education during the American
Occupation
• 1935 – 1941 – Education during the Philippine
Commonwealth
• 1941 – 1944 – Education during the Japanese
Occupation
• 1945 – 1946 – Education after WWII
• 1946 – present – Education under the Philippine
Republic

The Pre-Spanish Curriculum
• The Filipino possessed a culture of their own.
• They had contacts with other foreign peoples from
Arabia, India, China, Indo-China, and Borneo.
• The inhabitants were civilized people, possessing
their systems of writing, laws and moral standards in
a well organized government.

The Pre-Spanish Curriculum
• As shown in the rule of Barangays, their code of laws
–the code of Kalantiao and Maragtas, their belief in
Bathala, and the solidarity of the family were
obedience and respect had been practiced.

Pre-Spanish Devised-Cur
• The Spanish Missionaries aim to control of the
Filipinos, both body and soul.
• The curriculum then consisted of 3 R’s (reading,
writing and religion) to attain goals were the
acceptance of Catholicism and the acceptance of
Spanish rule.

The Spanish Devised Cur.
• The schools were parochial or convent schools.
• The main readings were the catecismo.
• The method of instruction was mainly individual
memorization.

AMERICAN Devised Cur.
• The motive of the Americans was to conquer the
Filipinos not only physically but also mentally.
• The curriculum was based on the ideals and
traditions of America and her hierarchy of values.
• English was the medium of instruction.

American Devised Cur.
• The primary curriculum prescribed for the Filipinos
consisted of three grades which provides training in
two aspects:
1. Body Training – physical education
2. Mental Training – English, Nature Study, and
Arithmetic.

Commonwealth Curriculum
• (1935-1946) considered as the period of expansion
and reform in the Philippine curriculum.
• The educational leaders expanded the curriculum by
introducing course in farming, domestic science, etc.

Commonwealth Curriculum
• Commonwealth Act 586, also known as educational
Act of 1940, recognized the elementary school
system.

Japanese Devised Curriculum
• They devised a curriculum for the Filipinos to suit
their vested interest.
• They introduced many changes in the curriculum by
including Nippongo, and abolishing English as the
medium of instruction and as a subject.

Japanese Devised Curriculum
• All textbooks were censored and revised.
• It caused a “black out” in Philippine education and
impeded the educational progress of the Filipinos.

Liberation Period Curriculum
• (1945) Steps were taken to improve the curriculum
existing before the war, some steps taken were to
restore grade VII, to abolish the double-single
session, and most especially to adopt the modern
trends in education taken from the U.S.

Liberation Period Curriculum
• The curriculum remained basically the same as
before and was still subject-centered.

Philippine Republic Cur.
• Great experiments in the community school and the
use of vernacular in the first two grades of the
primary schools as the medium of instruction were
some of them.

• An experiment worth mentioning that led to a change
in the Philippine Educational Philosophy was that of
school and community collaboration pioneered by
Jose V. Aguilar.
• Schools are increasingly using instructional materials
that are Philippine-oriented.

• Memorandum No. 30, 1966 sets the order of priority in
the purchase of books for use in the schools were as
follows:
• Books which are contributions to Phil. Literature
• Books on character education and other library
materials
• Library equipment and permanent features

Curriculum Approaches
• 1. Technical – Scientific Approaches
• 2. Behavioral-rational Approach
• 3. System-managerial Approach
• 4. Intellectual –Academic Approach
• 5. Non-Technician / Non-Scientific Approach
• 6. Humanistic – aesthetic Approach
• 7. Re-conceptualist Approach
• 8. Reconstructionism
• 9. Eclectic Models

Technical – Scientific Approach
• The curriculum developers which may
include specialists, superintendents,
principals and coordinators are likened to
engineers and architects who use
instruments and empirical methods in
preparing a blueprint with well defined
elements orderly-sequenced procedures, and
quality control measures to increase the
probability of success in its implementation

Bases of Technical Scientific Approach
• 1. The curriculum will improve as the professional
competence of teachers improves.
• 2. The competence of teachers will improve when they
participate in curriculum development
• 3. When teachers share in shaping the goals and
selecting the content and method of instruction as well as
evaluating results, their involvement is assured.
• 4. When people interact during face-to-face sessions,
they will better understand one another.

Behavioral-Rational Approach
• It is a means-end approach. Curricula
developed through this approach become
the actual blueprints which prescribe the
roles of key figures in the educative
process.
• Viewing the curriculum as the means and
instruction as the end is a behavioral
orientation.

Systems-Managerial Approach
• 1. Motivate interest of all stakeholders
• 2. Encourage participation and
involvement of all stakeholders
• 3. Synthesize divergent viewpoints
• 4. Monitor curriculum implementation
• 5. Create a climate of innovation and
change

Intellectual- Academic Approach
• Emphasizes the importance of theories and
principles in curriculum planning.
• This model is influenced by the philosophy of John
Dewey

Non-Technical / Non-Scientific Approaches
• Flexible and less structured without predetermined
objectives to guide the learning-teaching process
• Contends that not all ends of education can be
known nor indeed to be known in all cases.

Humanistic-Aesthetic Approach
• Argues that those who favor the rational approach miss
the artistic and personal aspects of curriculum and
instruction.
• It is rooted in progressive philosophy which promotes
the liberation of learners from authoritarian teachers.

Reconceptualist Approach
• Criticizes the technocratic – scientific models as not
sensitive to the inner feelings and experience of
individuals.
• Reflects on existentialist orientation.
• The aim of education is not to control instruction in
order to preserve existing order.

Reconstructionism
• The school is an institution of social reform.
• Criticizes the progressivists for putting too much
emphasis on the individual learner to the neglect of
the needs of society.

Eclectic Models
• Oftentimes, Filipino educators, in particular,
prefer eclectic models (halo-halo) which are
a combination of several approaches, rather
than commit themselves to one particular
approach only.
• Eclectic models are not mere patchwork
(pagtagpi-tagpi) but a synthesis. (pagbuo o
paghahabi) where desired features from
several models are selected and integrated
into a new whole.

Curriculum Design
• The Subject-Area Design
• The Integrated Design
• The Core-Curriculum Design
• The Child-Centered Design
• The Social Reconstruction Design
• The De-schooling Design

Subject – Centered Design
• FOCUS - A group of subjects or subject matter that
represent the essential knowledge and values of
society that have survived the test of time.
• PHILOSOPHICAL ORIENTATION – Essentialism
• PROPOENT / S – Adler, Hutchins

Integrated Design
• FOCUS - the integration of two or more subjects,
both within and across disciplines, into an integrated
course.
• PHILOSOPHICAL ORIENTATION –
Experimentalism
• PROPONENT / S – Broudy, Silberman

Core Curriculum Design
• FOCUS – a common body of curriculum content and
learning experience that should be encountered by
all students – The great books
• PHILOSOPHICAL ORIENTATION – Perennialism
• PROPONENT /S – Goodlad / Boyer

Child-Centered Design
• FOCUS – Learning activities centered around the
interests and needs of the child, designed to
motivate and interest the child in the learning
process.
• PHILOSOPHICAL ORIENTATION – Progressivism
• PROPONENT / S – Dewey , Eisner

Social Reconstructionist
• FOCUS – critical analysis of the political, social, and
economic problems facing society; future trends; social
action projects designed to bring about social change.
• PHILOSOPHICAL ORIENTATION – Social
Reconstruction
• PROPONENT / S – Shane , Bramald

Deschooling
• FOCUS – in-school experiences, primarily
in the social sciences, designed to
develop the child’s sense of freedom from
the domination of the political, social, and
economic systems; out of school
experiences of equal value.
• PHILOSOPHICAL ORIENTATION –
Social Reconstructionism
• PROPONENT /S - Freire , Goodman

IMPLEMENTATION MODELS
1. Overcoming Resistance to Change (ORC)
2. Leadership Obstacle Course (LOC)
3. Linkage Model
4. Organizational Development (OD)
5. Rand Change Agent Model

ORC
* Focuses on overcoming staff resistance to
change that is present immediately before, or
at the time of the introduction of the
innovation.

LOC
• Extends the ORC model and puts emphasis on the
gathering of data to determine the extent and nature
of the resistance in order to deal with it appropriately.

The Linkage Model
• The linkage process involves a cycle of diagnosis,
search, retrieval, formulation of solution,
dissemination and evaluation.

OD
• This model is an information-processing change
strategy that enables the system to improve its
operations and the quality of interactions among its
members to facilitate the introduction of change.

Rand Model
• The Rand Model is based on the assumption that the
success of the implementation of new program
depends on:
• A. The characteristics of the proposed change
• B. Competencies of the teaching and administrative
staff
• C. The support of the local community
• D. The School organizational structure

Factors Affecting the Choice of
Implementation Model
1. Level of Resistance
2. Type of desired change
3. Available expertise
4. Available resources
5. Urgency of the situation

DEFINITION OF EVALUATION
Curriculum evaluation is a systematic process of
determining whether the curriculum as designed and
implemented has produced or is producing the
intended and desired results.
It is the means of determining whether the program
is meeting its goals, that is whether the measures /
outcomes for a given set of instructional inputs
match the intended or pre-specified outcomes.
(Tuckman, 1979)

Types of Evaluation
1.Humanistic approach – goal
free
2.Scientific approach –
purpose driven

Objectives of Evaluation
1. Scope – (teaching –program-cost
effectiveness)
2. Timing – (formative, summative,
impact)
3. Method – ( quantitative, qualitative)
4. Level – (classroom, school, national)
5. Personnel involved – (individual
teachers, committees, consultants)

Role of Evaluation in Cur. Dev

Evaluation Studies in the Philippines
1. 1925 Monroe Survey
2. 1959 Swanson Survey
3. 1969 Presidential Commission to Survey Philippine
Education (PCSPE)
4. 1976 Survey of Outcomes of Elementary Education
(SOUTELE)
5. 1982 Household and School Matching Survey
6. 1991 Congressional Commission on Education
(EDCOM)
7. 1991 National Evaluation and Impact Study of
PRODED

MONROE SURVEY
1. Administrative organization and supervision
2. Elementary education
3. Secondary Education
4. Higher Education
5. Teacher education and training
6. Language of instruction
7. Private education
8. Finance
9. Education of the non-Christians

SWANSON SURVEY
1. Elementary education
2. Secondary education
3. Vocational education
4. Teacher training
5. Organization and administration
6. Financing the public schools
7. The report included a deterioration of performance
in reading, language and arithmetic due to poor
instructional methods, large class sizes, and
inadequate supervision

Presidential Commission to Survey
Philippine Education (PCSPE)
1. Analyze performance of the educational system and its
relevance to national developmental goals
2. Ascertain the efficiency of the system
3. Identify areas which need more detailed investigation.
4. The report included findings on :
a. Mismatch between educational services and manpower
requirements
b. Mismatch between education priorities and the national
development priorities
c. Inequitable distribution of educational facilities and
resources across the regions
d. Lack of systematic planning and evaluation

SURVEY OF OUTCOMES OF ELEM
EDUCATION (SOUTELE)
1. Battery of achievement tests designed to measure the
outcomes of elementary education
2. General mental ability test of non-verbal type designed
to measure association
3. Student’s attitude inventory aimed to measure affective
objectives
4. Questionnaires in order to establish the profiles of pupils,
teachers, school heads, etc.
5. The study revealed deficiencies of elementary education
in terms of inputs (resources), processes (curriculum and
instruction), and outputs (students’ achievement). These
are affected by socio economic, school types, quality of
teaching.

The Household and School Matching
Survey (HSMS)
1. The survey hypothesized that learning is predicated
on the antecedent academic, social, physiological
variables.
2. The findings of the investigation showed that home-
related and community related variables have
greater influences on learning than school related
factors such as cost per pupil and numbers of
textbooks per students.

The Congressional Commission on
Education Study (EDCOM)
1. Enhancing the internal capability of the system to
satisfactorily implement the constitutional
provisions on education
2. Providing the system with necessary financial and
other infrastructure support
3. Strengthening the system’s linkages with all sectors
concerned in human resource development
4. Assisting the system to achieve its sectoral goals
and targets through strategies that are consistent
with the nation’s development goals.

The National Evaluation and Impact
Study of PRODED
1. Teacher factor is crucial in the success of the
teaching-learning process
2. There is a need to improve the pre-service and in-
service training of teachers that should include the
development of skills in classroom management,
teacher-pupil interaction, and the use of
instructional aids, etc.

Monitoring and Evaluation of RBEC
1. Defines what levels of learning students of schools
and divisions meet at various stages of the basic
education cycle based on the national curriculum.
2. Setting of minimum national standards for
capabilities, structures, processes and output based
on a template for school improvement processes
from planning to implementation to monitoring and
evaluation
3. Nationally standardized student assessment,
outcomes measurement and reporting of basic
school statistics

Presidential Commission on Educational
Reform (PCER)
1. Created through E.O. in 1988 to define a budget
feasible program of reform, and identify executive
priority policy recommendations and items for a
legislative agenda on education.
2. Comprised of multi sectoral group
3. Proposed the establishment of National Education
Evaluation and Testing System (NEETS) that
assumes responsibility for educational assessment
of all levels, including technical and skills
development

BILINGUAL EDUCATION
1. Article 14, sect 7 of 1987 constitution – “for the
purposes of communication and instruction, the
official languages of the Philippines are Filipino and
until otherwise provided by law, English.”
2. DECS Order 52, s. 1987 – the policy of bilingual
education aims to make every Filipino competent in
both Filipino and English at the national level
3. DECS defines bilingual as “separate use of Filipino
and English as media of instruction in specific
subjects.”

Early Childhood Care and Development
(ECCD)
1. Art 15, Sec 2, 1987 Phil. Cons. – recognizes the
“right of children to assistance, including proper
care and nutrition, and special protection from all
forms of neglect, abuse, cruelty, exploitation and
other conditions prejudicial to their development.”
2. UN Convention on the Rights of Child
3. Education for All (EFA) agenda of DECS, 1990
envisioned 90% in 2000 of early childhood care and
development either home-based services or
kindergarten / nursery classes

Other issues
1. Access to pre-school education
2. Private Pre-school education
3. Global education
4. Environmental education

curriculum-development1.ppt

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to curriculum-development1.ppt (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

curriculum-development1.ppt