SURVEY
Survey 2015
Copyright © 2016 by Stairway Foundation, Inc.
and the Department of Education, Philippines
All rights reserved. This manual or any portion thereof
may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever
without the express written permission of the publishers
except for the use of brief quotations in a book review.
Printed in the Philippines
First Printing, 2016
Design and Layout: Magnus Peterson
Stairway Foundation, Inc.
Brgy Aninuan, Puerto Galera, Oriental Mindoro, Philippines
+63 917 8431922
www.stairwayfoundation.org
Introduction
Children today are native digital citizens, and CyberSpace is increasingly
becoming a more important part of their lives. It is imperative that we as
parents, teachers and caregivers understand the realms of the online world
and how children generally fare in this largely unchartered space. Only then
can we design the proper interventions to make the internet a safer place for
our children.
This CyberSafe survey is an attempt to understand how children live online.
We asked 1,268 children aged 7-12 and 1,143 children aged 13-16 how they
use the internet. All are school children and come from the areas of the
National Capital Region, the municipality of Silang in Cavite, the municipality
of Zamboanga Sibugay in Zamboanga, Bayawan City and Bacolod City in the
Negros province, Cebu City and the Municipality ofTuy in Batangas. Most of
the results presented are age group desegregated, while some cover both
groups. Throughout the conduct of the survey, facilitated via CyberSafe
sessions conducted by a number of“Break the Silence”partners, we made
sure to inform children on how to get help, if they are facing an online problem.
The survey presented is meant to address a gap in data concerning Child
Online Protection (COP) in the Philippines and serves as an update to a similar
research Stairway and the Break the Silence Network conducted in 2013.
Although we can not claim that the results are fully representative of the
whole age groups interviewed, they certainly offer important insights we
can learn from.
Stairway would like to thank UNICEF Philippines for supporting this study. We
would also like to thank the following“Break the Silence”partners for helping
us administer the survey: Food for the Hungry Philippines, the Municipal
Social Welfare and Development Offices of Silang, Cavite and Zamboanga
Sibugay, Katalingbanong Pagtagad Alang sa Kauswagan (KAPASKI), Bakyas
Community Development Center, Inc. (BCDCI), SPO2 Bill Felisan of Cebu City
and the Lipa Archdiocese Social Action Center (LASAC). Special thanks to the
Education Department of NCA-CEOP UK for providing valuable guidance in
crafting the survey questionnaires.
2
General Internet usage
9 out of 10 children are
using the Internet 90%
3
Top means for accessing the net are
4 out of 10:
through home connections
3 out of 10: through Mobile data
2 out of 10: through Internet Cafés
1 out of 10: through multiple connections
Where do children get money for net access?
5 out of 10
use their parents allowances
3 out of 10: do not need it (use net connection at home)
2 out of 10: get it from their food allowance
Primary uses of the internet for children
4 out of 10:
research (school assignments)
3 out of 10: Social Media
2 out of 10: video streaming, downloading and other activities
1 out of 10: online gaming
The top 3 choices for Social Media sites for children
8 out of 10:
Facebook
1 out of 10: Twitter
1 out of 10: Instagram
50%
40%
40%
80%
7-16 years
7-16 years
7-16 years
7-16 years
4
Privacy status of children’s Social Media Account
4 out of 10
had public accounts
2 out of 10 had private accounts
4 out of 10 did not know
5 out of 10
had public accounts
3 out of 10 had private accounts
2 out of 10 did not know
“Friending”online strangers
8 out of 10
did not add online strangers
1 out of 10 added online strangers
1 out of 10 added online strangers with mutual friends
5 out of 10
did not add online strangers
3 out of 10 added online strangers
2 out of 10 added online strangers with mutual friends
50%
40%
80%
Cyber Privacy
50%
7-12 years
13-16 years
7-12 years
13-16 years
5
Chatting with online strangers
8 out of 10
do not chat with online strangers
2 out of 10 chat with online strangers
6 out of 10
do not chat with online strangers
4 out of 10 chat with online strangers
Has anyone asked them to do an eyeball?
(to meet up with an online stranger)
9 out of 10
no one asked
1 out of 10 have been asked
8 out of 10
no one asked
2 out of 10 have been asked
80%
7-12 years
13-16 years
60%
90%
80%
7-12 years
13-16 years
7 out of 10 do not chat with online
strangers
70%
6
Posting personal information online
6 out of 10
did not post personal information online
3 out of 10 post personal information online
1 out of 10 post selective information only
Using check-in function on Facebook
7 out of 10
did not use this feature
2 out of 10 sometimes try it
1 out of 10 used this feature
6 out of 10
did not use this feature
3 out of 10 sometimes try it
1 out of 10 used this feature
60%
70%
60%
7-12 years
13-16 years
3 out of 10 post personal
information online 30%
7-16 years
7
Online Privacy, why is this a concern?
The internet presents a world of expanded opportunity for children.
However, like the offline world it presents certain risks if used in an
unsafe manner. We have to recognize that the internet (social media
in particular) is used by children as a“socialization tool”. They use it to
connect with their real world friends and to meet new online friends.
As a socialization tool, social media offer near limitless possibilities
for communication and interaction. However, we should be aware
of certain online behaviors that might put children at risk.
Some children prefer to have“public”social media profiles. A public
profile enables online strangers (anybody not in their friends list) to
see what they post online. Having a public profile increases the risk for
a child to be contacted by online child sex offenders, the information
they post being harvested or being subjected to unwanted online
interaction, like through comments in their photos or posts.
Aside from the privacy level of profiles themselves, some children also
have different views on what they consider as“private information”.
Information that they would generally not reveal to strangers offline,
would be freely given via their profiles in the online world.
Another risky behavior is adding up online strangers as friends. Children
might have a“private”social media profile, but if they add online
strangers in their social media friends list, the purpose of having a
“private”social media profile is defeated.
Thus, we should talk to children about the following aspects:
•	 Children should learn the privacy settings of their preferred
Social Media Sites. There are ways wherein they can restrict who
see what they post online.
•	 Talk to them about the concept of“private”digital information.
The information they will not be comfortable to give out offline,
should also be the kept private online.
•	 Children should be wary regarding who they add online. Online
friends might not really be who they say they are.
8
Online boyfriend/girlfriend
79%
had none
5% had one
16% said it was a secret
81%
had none
7% had one
12% said it was a secret
Do you know any child who has been asked to strip naked online?
9 out of 10
did not know anyone
1 out of 10 knew someone
Do you know any child who takes nude selfies?
9 out of 10
did not know anyone
1 out of 10 knew someone
Online relationships,
image and content sharing
7-12 years
13-16 years
90%
90%
79%
81%
7-16 years
7-16 years
9
Do you know any child who strips naked in front of the webcam
in exchange for money or load?
9 out of 10
did not know anyone
1 out of 10 knew someone
Have you seen pornographic links (advertisements, videos,
photos, posts, etc.) via Social Media?
7 out of 10:
Yes
3 out of 10: No
5 out of 10:
Yes
5 out of 10: No
90%
7-12 years
13-16 years
70%
50%
6 out of 10 have seen
pornographic links
via Social Media
60%
7-16 years
10
Online relationships and sexting
Since the internet is another“life sphere”for children, teenagers in particular,
online romantic relationships are common. This is not necessarily bad, but
the medium and whom they engage with online definitely poses a risk.
The concept of an online boyfriend/girlfriend is someone, whom they have
a romantic relationship with through the internet, but they have not met the
person in real life yet. Children should realize that they will not be 100% sure
if this online boyfriend/girlfriend is who they say they are.
As with any romantic relationship, teenagers might also be exploring their
sexuality through these online romantic relationships. Sexting or sex chats
– the act of sending sexualized messages or images through the internet
– is one of the primary methods of exploring sexuality online. Unfortunately,
once a child takes a nude image of him/herself using a digital device like a
mobile phone, he/she is already exposing himself/herself to great risk. By the
time the child sends or uploads the image over the internet, even though it
might be intended for personal purposes, he/she basically loses control of it.
It might get shared through:
•	 Private messaging
•	 Social Media pages
•	 Social Media groups
•	 Websites
•	 Downloaded
•	 Shared offline
All of the above might have immediate and long term consequences for the
child. Thus, we must teach children online protective behavior and encourage
them never to create such images, as they put themselves into high risk of
uncontrolled exposure and exploitation.
CYBERSA
FE
A
PP R O V ED
11
Do children know of any other children who have been a victim
of cyberbullying?
3 out of 10:
Yes
7 out of 10: No
4 out of 10:
Yes
6 out of 10: No
Cyberbullying usually happens
6 out of 10:
through social media
3 out of 10: through chatting
1 out of 10: through texting
8 out of 10:
through social media
2 out of 10: through chatting
Cyberbullying
60%
7-12 years
13-16 years
7-12 years
13-16 years
30%
40%
80%
12
Ways of cyberbullying
3 out of 10:
through threats
2 out of 10: through photo editing
1 out of 10: through exposing one’s secret conversation
1 out of 10: humiliation
3 out of 10: creation of poser account, exclusion and other
3 out of 10:
through photo editing
2 out of 10: through humiliation
2 out of 10: through threats
1 out of 10: through exposing one’s secret conversation
2 out of 10: creation of poser account, exclusion and other
Who are the usual cyberbullies?
3 out of 10:
classmates
2 out of 10: school mates
2 out of 10: people who obviously use fake profiles
1 out of 10: unknown people who do not seem to be using fake profiles
1 out of 10: children from other schools
1 out of 10: unspecified
2 out of 10:
classmates
2 out of 10: school mates
2 out of 10: people who obviously use fake profiles
1 out of 10: unknown people who do not seem to be using fake profiles
2 out of 10: children from other schools
1 out of 10: unspecified
30%
7-12 years
13-16 years
30%
30%
20%
13-16 years
7-12 years
13
2 out of 10 cyberbullies
obviously use fake profiles
20%
Understanding Cyberbullying
While there is not exactly any harmless form for bullying, cyberbullying is
particularly repugnant and complicated, as the medium magnifies the problem
in almost every aspect. It becomes an invasion of the home space, since it is
not bound by any location or time of the day. The offending posts or images
will be on the internet 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Bystanders – people who
witness the bullying – can range from a few people to hundreds or even
thousands, if the cyberbullying is done via public posts. Cyberbullies can remain
anonymous, as it is easy to create fake profiles in Social Media.
We must make children understand that cyberbullying should not be ignored,
and that it is never the victim’s fault. We have to teach how to proactively
prevent cyberbullying by practicing online privacy, by learning how to report
offending posts and how to block cyberbullies.
We should also know that cyberbullying is a school concern. In the Philippines,
schools are mandated to address the prevention and management of Cyber-
bullying via DepEd order no. 40, series of 2012 (the DepEd child protection
policy) and via the anti-bullying law (RA 10627).
14
Where do children often post their selfies?
9 out of 10:
Facebook
1 out of 10: Instagram or Twitter
Do they know of any other children who take“sexy”selfies?
3 out of 10:
Yes
7 out of 10: No
4 out of 10:
Yes
6 out of 10: No
Has anyone sent them a sexy selfie before?
9 out of 10:
No
1 out of 10: Yes
8 out of 10:
No
2 out of 10: Yes
40%
30%
90%
Selfies
90%
7-12 years
13-16 years
7-12 years
13-16 years
80%
7-16 years
15
If children have an online problem, who would be the first person they
would go to for help?
60%
would go to their parents
14% would go to their friends
6% would go to their siblings
5% would go their teachers
15% would not tell anyone about it
34%
would go to their parents
33% would go to their friends
10% would go to their siblings
1% would go their teachers
22% would not tell anyone about it
Do their parents know about their online activities?
7 out of 10:
parents know
2 out of 10: parents know a little bit
1 out of 10: parents have no idea at all
5 out of 10:
parents know
4 out of 10: parents know a little bit
1 out of 10: parents have no idea at all
7-12 years
13-16 years
Getting help
7-12 years
13-16 years
70%
50%
34%
60%
16
Are children comfortable to let their parents know about their
online activities?
5 out of 10:
ok that their parents know
2 out of 10: NOT ok that their parents know
3 out of 10: ok, but not for all things
4 out of 10:
ok that their parents know
1 out of 10: NOT ok that their parents know
5 out of 10: ok, but not for all things
Does anyone teach children about risks and dangers they might face online?
6 out of 10:
NO ONE has talked to them about it
4 out of 10: someone has talked to them about it
4 out of 10:
NO ONE has talked to them about it
6 out of 10: someone has talked to them about it
50%
40%
60%
7-12 years
13-16 years
7-12 years
13-16 years
40%
17
NO ONE
has talked to them about
risks and dangers online
50%
Cyber safe manual_2
19
Whom should we go to for help regarding an online child protection concern?
If our concern is with regard to Cyberbullying, the school is the primary
institution tasked to manage these cases under Philippine law.
However, if the online child protection concern is already criminal in nature
(e.g. leaked nude images, online threats, online grooming, child pornography,
etc.), then we should consider contacting the agencies below:
PNP Anti CyberCrime website: http://pnpacg.ph/main/
The Inter-Agency Council Against Child Pornography: www.iacacp.gov.ph
Stairway Foundation, Inc.: report@stairwayfoundation.org
As duty bearers, we should be actively engaging with children in order to find
out the issues that affect their lives, both offline and online.
Children should see us as trusted adults, so they will consult us, if they have
any online concerns.
CALL OR TEXT:
Philippine National Police (PNP) Patrol 117
Philippine National Police - Anti Cybercrime Group (PNP-ACG) - Project Angelnet:
Tel. No. (02) 723-0401, local 5354 Fax. No. (02) 414-1560
National Bureau of Investigation (NBI): (02) 523-8231 to 38 local 3454 to 3455
Department of Justice - Office of Cybercrime (DOJ-OCC): Tel. No. (02) 526-2747
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD):
Text DSWD <space> URL Adress and send to 2327
Text blockchildporn <space> URL Adress and send to 0918-9122813
Cyber safe manual_2
Main Office
Stairway Foundation, Inc
Barangay Aninuan, Puerto Galera
Oriental Mindoro 5203
Philippines
Telephone: +63 917 8431922
Manila Office
Ground Floor, Building 1, Emilio Aguinaldo College
1113-1117 San Marcelino St., Ermita, Manila 1000
Telephone: +63 2 516 3625
email: info@stairwayfoundation.org
Copyright © 2016 Stairway Foundation Inc.
All Right Reserved

More Related Content

PDF
Cyber safe manual_2_final_lowres
PDF
Cybersafe manual-1 lowres
PPTX
Digital Primary School Kids
PPT
Technology Influence
PPT
Digital life middle school presentation at Great Neck South Middle
PPTX
Internet safetypresentationghs
PPTX
Internet safetypresentation
PDF
Guia de ciberseguridad para menores de Europol:
Cyber safe manual_2_final_lowres
Cybersafe manual-1 lowres
Digital Primary School Kids
Technology Influence
Digital life middle school presentation at Great Neck South Middle
Internet safetypresentationghs
Internet safetypresentation
Guia de ciberseguridad para menores de Europol:

What's hot (20)

PDF
Girls Talk August 2016
PPTX
Cyberbullying Guide - Parents, Teachers & Children
PDF
Social networking leaflet
PDF
Parents in a Digital Age Report
PDF
Net Cetera: Chatting with Kids About Being Online 2014
PDF
Safer internet day mo i cpc 2 feb 2014sb
PDF
Eu Kids Online
PDF
Online safety
PDF
E safety-slide-presentation
PPTX
Protection of children over the internet
PDF
aw-trust-how-to-talk-to-your-children
PPT
Internet Safety for Families and Children
PDF
Cyberbullying. It's here.
PPT
Playing safe
PPTX
Aurora - Social media
PPTX
cyberbullying/social networks conversation
PPTX
Child online protection a collective responsibillity
PPTX
Web safety
PPT
Internet Safety
Girls Talk August 2016
Cyberbullying Guide - Parents, Teachers & Children
Social networking leaflet
Parents in a Digital Age Report
Net Cetera: Chatting with Kids About Being Online 2014
Safer internet day mo i cpc 2 feb 2014sb
Eu Kids Online
Online safety
E safety-slide-presentation
Protection of children over the internet
aw-trust-how-to-talk-to-your-children
Internet Safety for Families and Children
Cyberbullying. It's here.
Playing safe
Aurora - Social media
cyberbullying/social networks conversation
Child online protection a collective responsibillity
Web safety
Internet Safety
Ad

Similar to Cyber safe manual_2 (20)

PPTX
Children-safety-online-Presentation.pptx
PPTX
Social networks
PPTX
Social Media Safety for Parents
PPTX
4 1-1 of social networking safety
PPT
cyberworld
PPT
Slisn Pres1
PDF
Internet Safety
PPT
Eu kids online II key findings 11 april 2011
PPT
Social_Media_Presentation.ppt
PPT
Social_Media_Presentation.ppt
PDF
Exposed: Your Child's Digital Life
PDF
Social Media & Children's Safety 101
PPTX
Internet Safety for Parents
PPT
Internet Awareness10
PPT
Social media details.ppt
PPT
Eu kids online ii safer internet forum plenary, oct 2010Risks and safety on t...
PPT
Your Child's Digital Tattoo
PDF
Mc afee digital deception study 2013
PPTX
Perils of social media
PPT
Internet safety power_point
Children-safety-online-Presentation.pptx
Social networks
Social Media Safety for Parents
4 1-1 of social networking safety
cyberworld
Slisn Pres1
Internet Safety
Eu kids online II key findings 11 april 2011
Social_Media_Presentation.ppt
Social_Media_Presentation.ppt
Exposed: Your Child's Digital Life
Social Media & Children's Safety 101
Internet Safety for Parents
Internet Awareness10
Social media details.ppt
Eu kids online ii safer internet forum plenary, oct 2010Risks and safety on t...
Your Child's Digital Tattoo
Mc afee digital deception study 2013
Perils of social media
Internet safety power_point
Ad

More from EDITHA HONRADEZ (20)

PPTX
Nagagamit nang wasto ang pangngalan sa pagtukoy ng mga tao, lugar, bagay, at ...
PPTX
Filipino q4 week 3 naisakikilos ang napakinggang awit
PPTX
Epp he aralin 20
PPTX
Mapeh quarter 2 [autosaved]
PPTX
Health quarter 2 aralin 1
PPTX
Epp he aralin 20
PPTX
Epp he aralin 19
PPTX
Epp he aralin 15
PPTX
Epp he aralin 13
PPTX
Epp he aralin 12
PPTX
Epp he aralin 10
PPTX
Epp he aralin 9
PPTX
Epp he aralin 8 pagpapanatili ng maayos ang sariling tindig
PPTX
Epp he aralin 6
PPTX
Epp he aralin 5
PPTX
Epp he aralin 4
PPTX
Epp he aralin 3
PPTX
EPP HE ARALIN 2
PPTX
Ap aralin 6
PPTX
Ap yunit iii aralin 2
Nagagamit nang wasto ang pangngalan sa pagtukoy ng mga tao, lugar, bagay, at ...
Filipino q4 week 3 naisakikilos ang napakinggang awit
Epp he aralin 20
Mapeh quarter 2 [autosaved]
Health quarter 2 aralin 1
Epp he aralin 20
Epp he aralin 19
Epp he aralin 15
Epp he aralin 13
Epp he aralin 12
Epp he aralin 10
Epp he aralin 9
Epp he aralin 8 pagpapanatili ng maayos ang sariling tindig
Epp he aralin 6
Epp he aralin 5
Epp he aralin 4
Epp he aralin 3
EPP HE ARALIN 2
Ap aralin 6
Ap yunit iii aralin 2

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PDF
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PPTX
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
PDF
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
advance database management system book.pdf
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf

Cyber safe manual_2

  • 2. Copyright © 2016 by Stairway Foundation, Inc. and the Department of Education, Philippines All rights reserved. This manual or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the publishers except for the use of brief quotations in a book review. Printed in the Philippines First Printing, 2016 Design and Layout: Magnus Peterson Stairway Foundation, Inc. Brgy Aninuan, Puerto Galera, Oriental Mindoro, Philippines +63 917 8431922 www.stairwayfoundation.org
  • 3. Introduction Children today are native digital citizens, and CyberSpace is increasingly becoming a more important part of their lives. It is imperative that we as parents, teachers and caregivers understand the realms of the online world and how children generally fare in this largely unchartered space. Only then can we design the proper interventions to make the internet a safer place for our children. This CyberSafe survey is an attempt to understand how children live online. We asked 1,268 children aged 7-12 and 1,143 children aged 13-16 how they use the internet. All are school children and come from the areas of the National Capital Region, the municipality of Silang in Cavite, the municipality of Zamboanga Sibugay in Zamboanga, Bayawan City and Bacolod City in the Negros province, Cebu City and the Municipality ofTuy in Batangas. Most of the results presented are age group desegregated, while some cover both groups. Throughout the conduct of the survey, facilitated via CyberSafe sessions conducted by a number of“Break the Silence”partners, we made sure to inform children on how to get help, if they are facing an online problem. The survey presented is meant to address a gap in data concerning Child Online Protection (COP) in the Philippines and serves as an update to a similar research Stairway and the Break the Silence Network conducted in 2013. Although we can not claim that the results are fully representative of the whole age groups interviewed, they certainly offer important insights we can learn from. Stairway would like to thank UNICEF Philippines for supporting this study. We would also like to thank the following“Break the Silence”partners for helping us administer the survey: Food for the Hungry Philippines, the Municipal Social Welfare and Development Offices of Silang, Cavite and Zamboanga Sibugay, Katalingbanong Pagtagad Alang sa Kauswagan (KAPASKI), Bakyas Community Development Center, Inc. (BCDCI), SPO2 Bill Felisan of Cebu City and the Lipa Archdiocese Social Action Center (LASAC). Special thanks to the Education Department of NCA-CEOP UK for providing valuable guidance in crafting the survey questionnaires.
  • 4. 2 General Internet usage 9 out of 10 children are using the Internet 90%
  • 5. 3 Top means for accessing the net are 4 out of 10: through home connections 3 out of 10: through Mobile data 2 out of 10: through Internet Cafés 1 out of 10: through multiple connections Where do children get money for net access? 5 out of 10 use their parents allowances 3 out of 10: do not need it (use net connection at home) 2 out of 10: get it from their food allowance Primary uses of the internet for children 4 out of 10: research (school assignments) 3 out of 10: Social Media 2 out of 10: video streaming, downloading and other activities 1 out of 10: online gaming The top 3 choices for Social Media sites for children 8 out of 10: Facebook 1 out of 10: Twitter 1 out of 10: Instagram 50% 40% 40% 80% 7-16 years 7-16 years 7-16 years 7-16 years
  • 6. 4 Privacy status of children’s Social Media Account 4 out of 10 had public accounts 2 out of 10 had private accounts 4 out of 10 did not know 5 out of 10 had public accounts 3 out of 10 had private accounts 2 out of 10 did not know “Friending”online strangers 8 out of 10 did not add online strangers 1 out of 10 added online strangers 1 out of 10 added online strangers with mutual friends 5 out of 10 did not add online strangers 3 out of 10 added online strangers 2 out of 10 added online strangers with mutual friends 50% 40% 80% Cyber Privacy 50% 7-12 years 13-16 years 7-12 years 13-16 years
  • 7. 5 Chatting with online strangers 8 out of 10 do not chat with online strangers 2 out of 10 chat with online strangers 6 out of 10 do not chat with online strangers 4 out of 10 chat with online strangers Has anyone asked them to do an eyeball? (to meet up with an online stranger) 9 out of 10 no one asked 1 out of 10 have been asked 8 out of 10 no one asked 2 out of 10 have been asked 80% 7-12 years 13-16 years 60% 90% 80% 7-12 years 13-16 years 7 out of 10 do not chat with online strangers 70%
  • 8. 6 Posting personal information online 6 out of 10 did not post personal information online 3 out of 10 post personal information online 1 out of 10 post selective information only Using check-in function on Facebook 7 out of 10 did not use this feature 2 out of 10 sometimes try it 1 out of 10 used this feature 6 out of 10 did not use this feature 3 out of 10 sometimes try it 1 out of 10 used this feature 60% 70% 60% 7-12 years 13-16 years 3 out of 10 post personal information online 30% 7-16 years
  • 9. 7 Online Privacy, why is this a concern? The internet presents a world of expanded opportunity for children. However, like the offline world it presents certain risks if used in an unsafe manner. We have to recognize that the internet (social media in particular) is used by children as a“socialization tool”. They use it to connect with their real world friends and to meet new online friends. As a socialization tool, social media offer near limitless possibilities for communication and interaction. However, we should be aware of certain online behaviors that might put children at risk. Some children prefer to have“public”social media profiles. A public profile enables online strangers (anybody not in their friends list) to see what they post online. Having a public profile increases the risk for a child to be contacted by online child sex offenders, the information they post being harvested or being subjected to unwanted online interaction, like through comments in their photos or posts. Aside from the privacy level of profiles themselves, some children also have different views on what they consider as“private information”. Information that they would generally not reveal to strangers offline, would be freely given via their profiles in the online world. Another risky behavior is adding up online strangers as friends. Children might have a“private”social media profile, but if they add online strangers in their social media friends list, the purpose of having a “private”social media profile is defeated. Thus, we should talk to children about the following aspects: • Children should learn the privacy settings of their preferred Social Media Sites. There are ways wherein they can restrict who see what they post online. • Talk to them about the concept of“private”digital information. The information they will not be comfortable to give out offline, should also be the kept private online. • Children should be wary regarding who they add online. Online friends might not really be who they say they are.
  • 10. 8 Online boyfriend/girlfriend 79% had none 5% had one 16% said it was a secret 81% had none 7% had one 12% said it was a secret Do you know any child who has been asked to strip naked online? 9 out of 10 did not know anyone 1 out of 10 knew someone Do you know any child who takes nude selfies? 9 out of 10 did not know anyone 1 out of 10 knew someone Online relationships, image and content sharing 7-12 years 13-16 years 90% 90% 79% 81% 7-16 years 7-16 years
  • 11. 9 Do you know any child who strips naked in front of the webcam in exchange for money or load? 9 out of 10 did not know anyone 1 out of 10 knew someone Have you seen pornographic links (advertisements, videos, photos, posts, etc.) via Social Media? 7 out of 10: Yes 3 out of 10: No 5 out of 10: Yes 5 out of 10: No 90% 7-12 years 13-16 years 70% 50% 6 out of 10 have seen pornographic links via Social Media 60% 7-16 years
  • 12. 10 Online relationships and sexting Since the internet is another“life sphere”for children, teenagers in particular, online romantic relationships are common. This is not necessarily bad, but the medium and whom they engage with online definitely poses a risk. The concept of an online boyfriend/girlfriend is someone, whom they have a romantic relationship with through the internet, but they have not met the person in real life yet. Children should realize that they will not be 100% sure if this online boyfriend/girlfriend is who they say they are. As with any romantic relationship, teenagers might also be exploring their sexuality through these online romantic relationships. Sexting or sex chats – the act of sending sexualized messages or images through the internet – is one of the primary methods of exploring sexuality online. Unfortunately, once a child takes a nude image of him/herself using a digital device like a mobile phone, he/she is already exposing himself/herself to great risk. By the time the child sends or uploads the image over the internet, even though it might be intended for personal purposes, he/she basically loses control of it. It might get shared through: • Private messaging • Social Media pages • Social Media groups • Websites • Downloaded • Shared offline All of the above might have immediate and long term consequences for the child. Thus, we must teach children online protective behavior and encourage them never to create such images, as they put themselves into high risk of uncontrolled exposure and exploitation. CYBERSA FE A PP R O V ED
  • 13. 11 Do children know of any other children who have been a victim of cyberbullying? 3 out of 10: Yes 7 out of 10: No 4 out of 10: Yes 6 out of 10: No Cyberbullying usually happens 6 out of 10: through social media 3 out of 10: through chatting 1 out of 10: through texting 8 out of 10: through social media 2 out of 10: through chatting Cyberbullying 60% 7-12 years 13-16 years 7-12 years 13-16 years 30% 40% 80%
  • 14. 12 Ways of cyberbullying 3 out of 10: through threats 2 out of 10: through photo editing 1 out of 10: through exposing one’s secret conversation 1 out of 10: humiliation 3 out of 10: creation of poser account, exclusion and other 3 out of 10: through photo editing 2 out of 10: through humiliation 2 out of 10: through threats 1 out of 10: through exposing one’s secret conversation 2 out of 10: creation of poser account, exclusion and other Who are the usual cyberbullies? 3 out of 10: classmates 2 out of 10: school mates 2 out of 10: people who obviously use fake profiles 1 out of 10: unknown people who do not seem to be using fake profiles 1 out of 10: children from other schools 1 out of 10: unspecified 2 out of 10: classmates 2 out of 10: school mates 2 out of 10: people who obviously use fake profiles 1 out of 10: unknown people who do not seem to be using fake profiles 2 out of 10: children from other schools 1 out of 10: unspecified 30% 7-12 years 13-16 years 30% 30% 20% 13-16 years 7-12 years
  • 15. 13 2 out of 10 cyberbullies obviously use fake profiles 20% Understanding Cyberbullying While there is not exactly any harmless form for bullying, cyberbullying is particularly repugnant and complicated, as the medium magnifies the problem in almost every aspect. It becomes an invasion of the home space, since it is not bound by any location or time of the day. The offending posts or images will be on the internet 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Bystanders – people who witness the bullying – can range from a few people to hundreds or even thousands, if the cyberbullying is done via public posts. Cyberbullies can remain anonymous, as it is easy to create fake profiles in Social Media. We must make children understand that cyberbullying should not be ignored, and that it is never the victim’s fault. We have to teach how to proactively prevent cyberbullying by practicing online privacy, by learning how to report offending posts and how to block cyberbullies. We should also know that cyberbullying is a school concern. In the Philippines, schools are mandated to address the prevention and management of Cyber- bullying via DepEd order no. 40, series of 2012 (the DepEd child protection policy) and via the anti-bullying law (RA 10627).
  • 16. 14 Where do children often post their selfies? 9 out of 10: Facebook 1 out of 10: Instagram or Twitter Do they know of any other children who take“sexy”selfies? 3 out of 10: Yes 7 out of 10: No 4 out of 10: Yes 6 out of 10: No Has anyone sent them a sexy selfie before? 9 out of 10: No 1 out of 10: Yes 8 out of 10: No 2 out of 10: Yes 40% 30% 90% Selfies 90% 7-12 years 13-16 years 7-12 years 13-16 years 80% 7-16 years
  • 17. 15 If children have an online problem, who would be the first person they would go to for help? 60% would go to their parents 14% would go to their friends 6% would go to their siblings 5% would go their teachers 15% would not tell anyone about it 34% would go to their parents 33% would go to their friends 10% would go to their siblings 1% would go their teachers 22% would not tell anyone about it Do their parents know about their online activities? 7 out of 10: parents know 2 out of 10: parents know a little bit 1 out of 10: parents have no idea at all 5 out of 10: parents know 4 out of 10: parents know a little bit 1 out of 10: parents have no idea at all 7-12 years 13-16 years Getting help 7-12 years 13-16 years 70% 50% 34% 60%
  • 18. 16 Are children comfortable to let their parents know about their online activities? 5 out of 10: ok that their parents know 2 out of 10: NOT ok that their parents know 3 out of 10: ok, but not for all things 4 out of 10: ok that their parents know 1 out of 10: NOT ok that their parents know 5 out of 10: ok, but not for all things Does anyone teach children about risks and dangers they might face online? 6 out of 10: NO ONE has talked to them about it 4 out of 10: someone has talked to them about it 4 out of 10: NO ONE has talked to them about it 6 out of 10: someone has talked to them about it 50% 40% 60% 7-12 years 13-16 years 7-12 years 13-16 years 40%
  • 19. 17 NO ONE has talked to them about risks and dangers online 50%
  • 21. 19 Whom should we go to for help regarding an online child protection concern? If our concern is with regard to Cyberbullying, the school is the primary institution tasked to manage these cases under Philippine law. However, if the online child protection concern is already criminal in nature (e.g. leaked nude images, online threats, online grooming, child pornography, etc.), then we should consider contacting the agencies below: PNP Anti CyberCrime website: http://pnpacg.ph/main/ The Inter-Agency Council Against Child Pornography: www.iacacp.gov.ph Stairway Foundation, Inc.: report@stairwayfoundation.org As duty bearers, we should be actively engaging with children in order to find out the issues that affect their lives, both offline and online. Children should see us as trusted adults, so they will consult us, if they have any online concerns. CALL OR TEXT: Philippine National Police (PNP) Patrol 117 Philippine National Police - Anti Cybercrime Group (PNP-ACG) - Project Angelnet: Tel. No. (02) 723-0401, local 5354 Fax. No. (02) 414-1560 National Bureau of Investigation (NBI): (02) 523-8231 to 38 local 3454 to 3455 Department of Justice - Office of Cybercrime (DOJ-OCC): Tel. No. (02) 526-2747 Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD): Text DSWD <space> URL Adress and send to 2327 Text blockchildporn <space> URL Adress and send to 0918-9122813
  • 23. Main Office Stairway Foundation, Inc Barangay Aninuan, Puerto Galera Oriental Mindoro 5203 Philippines Telephone: +63 917 8431922 Manila Office Ground Floor, Building 1, Emilio Aguinaldo College 1113-1117 San Marcelino St., Ermita, Manila 1000 Telephone: +63 2 516 3625 email: info@stairwayfoundation.org Copyright © 2016 Stairway Foundation Inc. All Right Reserved