E-governance Models
Download as PPTX, PDF26 likes59,597 views
The document outlines various e-governance models including broadcasting, comparative analysis, critical flow, e-advocacy, and interactive service models, highlighting their characteristics, applications, merits, and demerits. Each model aims to enhance information accessibility, citizen participation, and governance efficiency through digital networks, while also facing challenges related to technology dependence and information flow. Case studies and examples illustrate the practical applications and potential impact of these models on governance practices.
E-governance Models
- 1. BY : KARISHMA GAWATE IT – 4th Year E-GOVERNANCE MODELS
- 2. The few generic models which have emerged and are being practiced have been identified as: • Broadcasting Model • Comparative Analysis Model • Critical Flow Model • E-Advocacy Model • Interactive Service Model
- 3. Differences: Each of these models exhibit several variations depending on the • Local situation • Governance activities being carried out by them Similarities : All these models share following common characteristics • Enabling equal access to information to anyone who is a linked to the digital network, and • De-concentration of information across the entire digital network
- 4. • The information does not reside at any one particular level (or node) in Digital Governance Models but gets distributed across all the nodes. • This opens up greater possibility of its exploitative use at all levels. • This distribution of information may happen through -direct access to an ICT node -public access -convergent modes
- 5. 1. Broadcasting Model • Based on mass dissemination of governance- related information which is already available in the public domain into the wider public domain using ICTs. • This raises awareness among the citizens about ongoing governance processes and government services that are available to them and how they can benefit from them • The application of this model using appropriate technologies, could reduce the "information failure situations”
- 7. Applications : · Putting governmental laws and legislations online · Making available the names, contact addresses, emails, mobile numbers of local/ regional/ national government officials online. · Make available information such as governmental plans, budgets, expenditures, and performance reports online. · Putting key judicial decisions which are of value to general citizens and create a precedence for future actions online. viz. key environmental decisions, state vs. citizen decisions etc.
- 8. Merits : • It enhances 'access' and 'flow' of information to all segments of the society. • Government can use this model to provide greater governance services to their constituencies, and to enhance the participation of citizens in governance processes. Demerits: The model can lose its effectiveness • In situation of optimal ignorance • In societies, where the free flow of information is not possible.
- 9. 2. Comparative Analysis Model • This model empowers people by comparing cases of bad governance with those of good governance and identifying specific aspects of bad governance, the reasons and people behind them, and how the situation can be improved. • The comparison could be made over a time scale to get a snapshot of the past and the present situation or could be used to compare the effectiveness of an intervention by comparing two similar situations. • The strength of this model lies in the infinite capacity of digital networks to store varied information and retrieve and transmit it instantly across all geographical and hierarchical barriers.
- 11. Applications • This model could be applied in the following possible ways: • To learn from past policies and actions and derive learning lessons for future policy-making. • To evaluate the effectiveness of the current policies and identify key learning in terms of strengths and flaws in the policies. • To effectively establish conditions of precedence, especially in the case of Judicial or legal decision-making (example for resolving patent-related disputes, public goods ownership rights), and use it to influence/ advocate future decision- making. • To enable informed decision-making at all levels by enhancing the background knowledge and also providing a rationale for action. • To evaluate the performance and track-record of a particular decision-maker/ decision-making body.
- 12. Merits : • Based on the existing sets of information • Watch-guard organizations and monitor-groups can use this model to continuously track the governance past record and performance and compare with different information sets. Demerits : • Requires the ability to analyze and bring out strong arguments • Ineffective in absence of a strong civil society interest and public memory which is essential to force decision- makers to improve existing governance practices
- 13. Examples : • Global : Human Development Indicators http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/ The Human Development Report of UNDP makes use of archived Statistical information pertaining to literacy, health, national income etc. as a benchmark to assess the progress made by different countries with regards to their Human Development Index and suggests policy recommendations based on that. • India: Comparative Learning from Disasters http://www.cddc.vt.edu/digitalgov/Latur-Gujarat.html In the wake of earthquake in Kutch in India (January 2001), there was a lot of comparative learning relating to disaster management drawn from a high intensity earthquake which shook Latur in India in 1993. Comparison of different Disasters can make people realize that damages to life and property incurred are not just a factor of intensity of the disaster but also dependent on the preparedness of the Government machinery and conducive government policies to handle that disaster.
- 14. 3. Critical Flow Model • The model is based on broadcasting information of 'critical' value (which by its very nature will not be disclosed by those involved with bad governance practices) to targeted audience using ICTs and other tools. Targeted audience may include media, affected parties, opposition parties, judicial bench, independent investigators or the general public. • Those who would divulge such information could include upright officials and workers, whistleblowers, affected parties and those who were themselves involved in bad governance practices but have now changed their minds or may wish to trade such information for lenient punishments
- 16. The use of this model requires a foresight of : • Understanding the "critical and use value" of a particular information set • How or from where this information could be obtained • How could the information be used strategically • Who are the best target group for such information- the users for whom the availability of this information will make a huge difference The strength of this model is that the concept of 'distance' and 'time' becomes redundant when information is hosted on a digital network. Once available on the digital network, the information could be used advantageously- by instantly transferring the critical information to its user group located anywhere or by making it freely available in the wider public domain.
- 17. Applications This model could be applied in the following possible ways : • Making available corruption related data about a particular Ministry / Division/ Officials online to its electoral constituency or to the concerned regulatory body. • Making available Research studies, Enquiry reports, Impact studies commissioned by the Government or Independent commissions to the affected parties. • Making Human Rights Violations cases violations freely available to Judiciary, NGOs and concerned citizens. • Making available information that is usually suppressed, for instance, Environmental Information on radioactivity spills, effluents discharge, information on green ratings of the company to concerned community.
- 18. Merits : • This model is more directed and evolved. • Different organizations can use it differently depending on the aspect of governance they situation they want to address. • The model corrects information failure, raising awareness about the bad governance practices, and acts as a hindrance to bad governance practices. • Also, the model exerts indirect pressure on the concerned governance institution / policy-making body to move away from optimal ignorance attitude to reform, and take into cognizance the interest and opinion of the masses in decision- making processes. Demerits : • The model may not work in cases where the governance mechanism does not allow public debates and opinions, and censures all information of critical nature.
- 19. Examples : • Global: Wikileaks www.wikileaks.org WikiLeaks is a not-for-profit media organization. It brings important news and information to the public. It publishes secret information, news leaks and classified media from anonymous sources to keep the public informed on cases of corruption, whistle blowing, and crimes. • Global: Transparency International -Daily Corruption News http://www.transparency.org/feed/dcn A service is being run by Transparency International called the "The Daily Corruption News" which reports on corruption from around the world. • India: Central Vigilance Committee http://cvc.nic.in The website provides free-access information to citizens about government officials who have been indicted on judicial charges relating to corruption and have been advised penalty. People can also file complaints against any public servant who fall within the jurisdiction of the Commission. India: Project VIGEYE http://www.vigeye.com/ • Vigeye (Vigilance Eye) is a citizen-centric initiative, wherein citizens join hands with the Central Vigilance Commission in fighting corruption in India. Project Vigeye is the platform through which vigilance information flows freely through common public, the government agencies and the vigilance commission.
- 20. 4. E-Advocacy Model Also known as Mobilization and Lobbying Model. • It is based on setting-up a planned, directed flow of information to build strong virtual allies to complement actions in the real world. • Virtual communities are formed which share similar values and concerns, and these communities in turn link up with or support real-life groups/ activities for concerted action. • It builds the momentum of real-world processes by adding the opinions and concerns expressed by virtual communities. • The strength of this model is in its diversity of the virtual community, and the ideas, expertise and resources accumulated through this virtual form of networking. • The model is able to mobilize and leverage human resources and information beyond geographical, institutional and bureaucratic barriers, and use it for concerted action.
- 21. •The strength of this model is in its diversity of the virtual community, and the ideas, expertise and resources accumulated through this virtual form of networking.
- 22. Applications • This model could be applied in the following possible ways: • Fostering public debates on issue of larger concerns, namely on the themes of upcoming conferences, treaties etc. • Formation of pressure groups on key issues to force decision- makers to take their concerns into cognizance. • Making available opinions of a suppressed groups who are not involved in the decision-making process into wider public domain. • Catalyzing wider participation in decision-making processes. • Building up global expertise on a particular theme in absence of localized information to aid decision-making.
- 23. Merits : • The model enhances the scope of participation of individuals and communities in debates which affect them and help them build a global alliance. • A community may no longer find itself isolated but may find an ally for mobilizing effective action through this model. • It also creates an effective deterrent for governments and decision-making bodies who are responsive to people's opinion to provide better governance. • The model could also be used favorably by the government in a positive manner to encourage public debates on issues where the opinion and expertise of civil society is of great importance and therefore could become a tool to enhance democratic practices and improve governance practices (especially in Developing Countries).
- 24. Examples : • Global: Drop The Debt Campaign http://www.jubileeusa.org/ The campaign spreads awareness of their activities through emails and mobilizes support of concerned individuals, and encourages them to directly express their concern to key decision-makers (by making available their email and other contact addresses). • India : PRS Legislative Research http://www.prsindia.org/billtrack/ Tracks parliamentary bills which have been introduced and are coming up for discussions. It analyses the bills, prepares summaries of reports of standing committees, puts forward its position, and engages in processes which allow them to voice their opinions.
- 25. 5. Interactive Service Models • It is a consolidation of the other digital governance models and opens up possibilities for one-to-one and self-serviced participation of individuals in governance processes. • the participation is direct and not through representatives. • It can bring greater objectivity and transparency in decision- making processes, and give a greater feeling of involvement and empowerment, provided that individuals are willing to engage in the governance processes. • Under this model, the various services offered by the government become directly available to its citizens by opening up an interactive Government to Consumer to Government (G2C2G) channel in various aspects of governance.
- 27. Applications This model could be applied in the following possible ways: • To establish an interactive communication channels with key policy-makers and members of planning commissions. • To conduct electronic ballots for the election of government officials and other office bearers. • To conduct public debates / opinion polls on issues of wider concern before formulation of policies and legislative frameworks. • Filing of grievances, feedback and reports by citizens with the concerned governmental body. • Establishing decentralised forms of governance. • Performing governance functions online such as revenue collection, filing of taxes, governmental procurement, payment transfer etc.
- 28. Demerits : • The model firmly relies on the interactive applications of ICT and therefore is a technology and cost intensive model • It would also require elemental familiarity of ICT among the citizens to fully benefit from this model Example : • India : Gyandoot http://www.gyandoot.net/gyandoot/intranet.html Gyandoot is an intranet in Dhar district connecting rural cyber cafes catering to the everyday needs of the masses. The site has following services to offer in addition to the hope that it has generated by networking, the first district in the state of Madhya Pradesh in India - Commodity/ Agricultural Marketing Information System - Copies of land maps - On-Line Registration of Applications - Grievance Redressal
- 29. THANK YOU