Tharindu Gunasiri
group 1
TUMORS OF THE
ESOPHAGUS
Benign Esophageal Tumors and
Cysts
• Benign tumors are rare (< 1 %)
• Classified in two groups
– Mucosal
– Extramucosal (intramural)
• More useful classification:
– 60% of benign neoplasms are leiomyomas
– 20% are cysts
– 5% are polyps
– Others (< 2 percent)
Leiomyomas
• Most common benign tumor of the esophagus
• Intramural in the circular muscle layer
• Average age at presentation is 38; twice as common in
males
• 90% occur in lower 2/3 of esophagus
• Obstruction and regurgitation may occur in large
lesions
• Dx:
– barium swallow is the most useful method
– CXR
– endoscopy
• Tx: majority can be removed by simple enucleation;
large tumors or those involving the GEJ may require
esophageal resection
Esophageal Cysts
• Arise as diverticula of the embryonic foregut of this
cyst present in childhood
• Over 60% are located along the right side of the
esophagus
• Enteric and bronchogenic cysts are the most
common
• 60% present in the first year of life with either
respiratory or esophageal symptoms
• Cyst found in the upper third of the esophagus
present in infancy while lower third lesions present
later in childhood
• Surgical excision by enucleation is the preferred
treatment
Pedunculated Intraluminal
Tumors (Polyps)
• Benign polyps are rare
• Usually occur in older men and may cause
intermittent dysphagia
• Are sometimes easily missed with barium
swallow and esophagoscopy
Malignant Tumors of the
Esophagus
• Usually are in advanced stages at the time of
diagnosis (involving the muscular wall and extending
into adjacent tissues)
• Alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking seem
to be the most consistent risk factors
• Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (95% of all
esophageal cancers) is a disease of men (5: 1)
• Squamous cell esophageal cancer occurs least
frequently in the cervical esophagus and
• Squamous cell esophageal cancer occurs most
often in the upper and midthoracic segments
Malignant Tumors of the
Esophagus
• Adenocarcinoma constitute approximate 8%
of primary esophageal cancers
• Most often occur in the distal third of the
esophagus in the 6th decade of life, but now
occurs not only more frequently but in younger
patients and is often detected at an earlier
stage
• Male to female ratio is 3:1
• Patients with Barretts metaplasia are 40 times
more likely to develop adenocarcinoma
• These tumors are aggressive as well
Clinical Presentation
• Dysphagia is the presenting complaint in 80-
90% of patients with esophageal carcinoma
• Early symptoms are sometimes nonspecific
retrosternal discomfort or indigestion
• As the tumor enlarges, dysphagia becomes
more progressive.
• Later symptoms include weight loss,
odynophagia, chest pain and hematemesis
Diagnosis
• Barium swallow has 92% accuracy
– Identify abn peristalsis, mucosal irregularity and annular
constructions
• Fiberoptic endoscopy with biopsy and washings is confirmatory
in 95% of cases
• Bronchoscopy with biopsyto r/o involvement of bronchus in
upper 2/3 tumors and synchronous lung primary
• Nasopharyngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy to r/o
synchronous head and neck lesions and vocal cord involvement
• CT scan of chest with extension to liver and adrenals to assess
tumor spread
Staging of Tumors
• Endoscopic ultrasound-to define the depth of
invasion and presence of paraesophageal
lymph nodes
• Chest x-ray ± abnormal findings
• CT scan (most widely used and now
standard radiographic means of a staging)
• Bronchoscopy for tumors which are proximal
to the trachea
The TNM classification
• (a) “T” (depth of invasion of the primary
tumor).
• (b) “N” (regional lymph involvement).
• (c) “M” (presence or absence of distant
metastases).
Primary Tumors (T)
• Tx Primary tumor cannot be assessed (cytologically
positive tumor not evident endoscopically or
radiographically)
• T0 No evidence of primary tumor (e.g., after treatment
with radiation and chemotherapy)
• Tis Carcinoma in situ
• T1 Tumor invades lamina propria or submucosa, but
not beyond it
• T2 Tumor invades muscularis propria
• T3 Tumor invades adventitia
• T4 Tumor invades adjacent structures (e.g., aorta,
tracheobronchial tree, vertebral bodies, pericardium)
Regional Lymph Nodes (N)
A. Nx Regional nodes cannot be assessed
B. N0 No regional node metastasis
C. N1 Regional node metastasis
Distant Metastasis (M)
1. M0 No metastasis
2. M1 Distal metastasis
Stage Grouping
STAGE T N M
Stage 0 Tis N0 M0
Stage I T1 N0 M0
Stage IIA T2
T3
N0
N0
M0
M0
Stage IIB T1
T2
N1
N1
M0
M0
Stage III T3
T4
N1
N1
M0
M0
Stage IV Any T Any N M1
Treatment
• Local tumor invasion or distant metastatic disease precludes
cure.
• Esophageal Ca is a systemic disease when it is diagnosed;
local therapy (radiation or operation) is simply unable to
eradicate this malignancy.
• The 5-year survival rate in Western countries from esophageal
Ca treated by either radiation or surgery is generally < 10%
• More than 80% of the patients die within 1 year of diagnosis.
Consequently, until very recently, the primary aim of therapy for
esophageal carcinoma has been palliation (restoring the
patient's ability to swallow).
• Esophageal Ca is notorious for its ability to spread in the
submucosal lymphatics well beyond the gross extent of the
tumor
• Resection to clear margins are therefore desirable to minimize
the possibility of recurrent tumor at the anastomotic suture line.
Surgery
• Resection provides the best palliation
for most patients with localized
carcinoma.
• Esophageal resection and reconstruction
remain formidable operations in patients
whose nutritional and pulmonary status
have been compromised by impaired
swallowing.
Surgery
Left thoracoabdominal incision
– Is the approach to distal esophageal Ca.
– Distal esophagus, proximal stomach, and adjacent LN-bearing
tissues are resected, and intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis
is performed.
IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY
– high intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis is performed. In
either case, a gastric drainage procedure (pyloromyotomy or
pyloroplasty) is recommended to prevent subsequent postvagotomy
gastric outlet obstruction due to pylorospasm.
– approach for higher thoracic esophageal tumors
Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy (limited exposure of the
intrathoracic esophagus and its blood supply and the risk of
hemorrhage and the inability to carry out a complete mediastinal
lymph node dissection ).
Laryngopharyngocesophagectomy. For treatment of Ca involving the
cervicothoracic esophagus (and frequently the larynx).
Transhiatal esophagectomy
without thoracotomy
• Cervical (arrowhead) and upper
abdominal midline (arrow)
incisions are made.
• Mobilization of the stomach for
esophageal replacement is performed
through a laparotomy with pyloroplasty.
• The esophagus is mobilized from
the back wall of the trachea
through the cervical incision.
• From below, the surgeon’s hand
passes through the widened hiatus.
Any remaining attachments of the
muscular esophageal tube are
avulsed from the esophageal wall.
Transhiatal esophagectomy
without thoracotomy
Disadvantages:
• limited exposure of the intrathoracic
esophagus & its blood supply
• the risk of hemorrhage
• the inability to carry out a complete
mediastinal lymph node dissection
Transhiatal esophagectomy without
thoracotomy (Orringer Technique)
• The cervical esophagus is clamped,
leaving adequate length for
reconstruction
• The esophagus is then extracted from
the mediastinum.
• The stomach is divided at the proximal
region with a stapler or clamp
Pyloromyotomy is performed at the
distal portion
• Remaining portion of the stomach is
advanced to the neck for
esophagogastric anastomosis.
Left thoracoabdominal
esophagectomy
• the approach to
distal esophageal Ca
• Distal esophagus,
proximal stomach,
and adjacent LN-bearing
tissues are
resected
• intrathoracic
esophagogastric
anastomosis is
performed.
IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY
• approach for higher
thoracic esophageal
tumors
• high intrathoracic
esophagogastric
anastomosis is
performed
• In either case, a
gastric drainage
procedure
(pyloromyotomy or
pyloroplasty) is
recommended to
prevent subsequent
postvagotomy gastric
outlet obstruction due
to pylorospasm.
Chemotherapy
• No data proved that chemotherapy alone provides improved
survival or palliation.
• Single-agent chemotherapy used to treat many patients with
esophageal Ca who present with distant disease, with cisplatin,
mitomycin, and 5-fluorouracil achieving reported response rates of
35%.
• Combination chemotherapy regimens such as: cisplatin, bleomycin,
and vindesine or methotrexate; cisplatin, mitoguazone, and
vindesine or vinblastine; and cisplatin and 5-fu used for metastatic
or unresectable esophageal Ca, with reported response rates of 11-
55% for 3-9 months.
• Combination chemotherapy has been used preoperatively in a
combined modality approach to esophageal Ca in hopes of
controlling occult metastatic disease and improving the resectability
rate.
Multimodality therapy
• Because most patients have systemic or locally invasive
disease that precludes cure, there is efforts to improve
survival with multimodality therapy.
• Experience with combined preoperative radiation
therapy and chemotherapy, as well as preoperative
chemotherapy and postoperative adjuvant radiation,
are encouraging.
• This therapy provide better local-regional control of
the tumor than can be achieved by radical resection of
the esophagus alone.
Transoral intubation
• Uses a variety of tubes (Souttar, Mackler, Mousseau, Fell,
and Celestin) and the Wilson-Cook and self-expanding
stents, have been used to provide palliation.
• Esophageal intubation carries an overall reported mortality
that ranges from 3-15% and a complication rate of 20%.
Complications:
• 1. perforation of the esophagus
• 2. migration of the tubes
• 3. obstruction of the tubes by food
• or tumor overgrowth.
• Endoscopic laser therapy improves dysphagia,
but multiple treatments are required and long-
term benefit is seldom achieved.
• Palliative internal bypass. Bypass of unresectable
Ca with colonic interposition, gastric tubes or
retrosternal gastric bypass as a method of
palliation.
• These procedures are of considerable magnitude
and carry a high mortality rate and survival in
these patients’ averages < 6 months.
Thank you !!!

More Related Content

PPTX
Management of Rectal Cancer
PPTX
Oesophageal carcinoma
PPTX
Management of pancreatic fistulas
PPT
Retroperitoneal mass
PPTX
Pancreatic Cancer.pptx
PPT
Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer
PPT
Carcinoid Tumour
Management of Rectal Cancer
Oesophageal carcinoma
Management of pancreatic fistulas
Retroperitoneal mass
Pancreatic Cancer.pptx
Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer
Carcinoid Tumour

What's hot (20)

PPTX
PERI-AMPULLARY CARCINOMA
PPTX
Management ca esophagus sneha
PPTX
Pancreatic carcinoma
PPTX
PPTX
CARCINOMA RECTUM MANAGEMENT
PPTX
Determining resectability in pancreatic cancer
PPT
Past present future - laparoscopic colorectal surgery
PPTX
Tumor small intestine
PPTX
pancreatic cancer management
PPTX
Colorectal polyps
PPT
D2 distal gastrectomy final
PPTX
MANAGEMENT OF CA COLON
PPTX
Cholangiocarcinoma
PPT
Anal cancer ppt
PPTX
Esophagectomy
PPTX
Evaluation and Management of Carcinoma Breast
PPT
Minimal invasive Surgery in Management of colorectal cancer
PPTX
Small bowel neoplasms neo
PPTX
Bariatric surgery 35
PPTX
ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
PERI-AMPULLARY CARCINOMA
Management ca esophagus sneha
Pancreatic carcinoma
CARCINOMA RECTUM MANAGEMENT
Determining resectability in pancreatic cancer
Past present future - laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Tumor small intestine
pancreatic cancer management
Colorectal polyps
D2 distal gastrectomy final
MANAGEMENT OF CA COLON
Cholangiocarcinoma
Anal cancer ppt
Esophagectomy
Evaluation and Management of Carcinoma Breast
Minimal invasive Surgery in Management of colorectal cancer
Small bowel neoplasms neo
Bariatric surgery 35
ILEAL POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS
Ad

Similar to Esophageal carcinoma (20)

PDF
Carcinoma esophagus
PPT
Cancer of the esophagus
PDF
Esophageal cancer .pdf
PPTX
Dysphagia.pptx
PPTX
Carcinoma oesophagus
PDF
Carcinoma oesophagus. cancer of the eosophagus
PPT
Esopageal cancer ,
PPTX
Esophageal cancer
PPT
Carcinoma esophagus
PPT
Carcinoma esophagus
PDF
esophagealca-180508170939.pdf
PPTX
esophagealca-180508170939.pptx
PPTX
Esophageal ca
PPTX
Ca esophagus 12th
PPTX
Carcinoma Esophagus new.pptx
PPT
11 esophageal cancer
PPTX
Esophageal cancer
PPTX
neoplasmsofoesophagus-230619112311-dfc34b23 (1).pptx
PPTX
esophagealca-180508170939 (1).pptx
PPTX
Esophagial carcinoma
Carcinoma esophagus
Cancer of the esophagus
Esophageal cancer .pdf
Dysphagia.pptx
Carcinoma oesophagus
Carcinoma oesophagus. cancer of the eosophagus
Esopageal cancer ,
Esophageal cancer
Carcinoma esophagus
Carcinoma esophagus
esophagealca-180508170939.pdf
esophagealca-180508170939.pptx
Esophageal ca
Ca esophagus 12th
Carcinoma Esophagus new.pptx
11 esophageal cancer
Esophageal cancer
neoplasmsofoesophagus-230619112311-dfc34b23 (1).pptx
esophagealca-180508170939 (1).pptx
Esophagial carcinoma
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
VITAL PULP THERAPY in pediatric dentistry
PPTX
Brucellosis. treatment in Uganda. Group II.pptx
PPTX
The Process of Infection by Windy Mesolas-Luzon.pptx
PPTX
Population growth (2)(1).11111111111pptx
PPTX
Symphosium Dr saurab ad Dr. Khushbu.pptx
PDF
Joint Commission EBPCD24_samplepages.pdf
PDF
Cellular Respiration-BIOLOGEYCHEMESTRY'S
PPTX
CLASS III MALOCCLUSION IN ORTHODONTICS
PDF
Indonesian Healthtech Innovation_11Sep2019_Industry_Geraldine Seow_1.pdf
PPTX
ATIBACTERIAL. PENICILLINS AND CEPHALOSPORINS.pptx
PDF
Key Updates for Pulmonary Tuberculosis Multiple Drug Resistance
PPTX
Seizures in paediatrics as a big cause of morbidity.pptx
DOCX
CASE PRESENTATION1.docx many type of disease make them.suffer .
PPTX
Case report session Apendisitis Akut people.pptx
PPTX
dr vivek orho post op pain.pptxhhhhhhhhhhh
PPT
NEPHROTIC SYNDROME POWER POINT PRESENTATION
DOCX
Advanced Nursing Procedures.....realted to advance nursing practice M.Sc. 1st...
PPTX
unit 1 community health nursing , community
PPT
toxicosis in pregnancy preeclampcia eclampcia.ppt
PPTX
Emotional Well Being & Conflict Resolution_VKV.pptx
VITAL PULP THERAPY in pediatric dentistry
Brucellosis. treatment in Uganda. Group II.pptx
The Process of Infection by Windy Mesolas-Luzon.pptx
Population growth (2)(1).11111111111pptx
Symphosium Dr saurab ad Dr. Khushbu.pptx
Joint Commission EBPCD24_samplepages.pdf
Cellular Respiration-BIOLOGEYCHEMESTRY'S
CLASS III MALOCCLUSION IN ORTHODONTICS
Indonesian Healthtech Innovation_11Sep2019_Industry_Geraldine Seow_1.pdf
ATIBACTERIAL. PENICILLINS AND CEPHALOSPORINS.pptx
Key Updates for Pulmonary Tuberculosis Multiple Drug Resistance
Seizures in paediatrics as a big cause of morbidity.pptx
CASE PRESENTATION1.docx many type of disease make them.suffer .
Case report session Apendisitis Akut people.pptx
dr vivek orho post op pain.pptxhhhhhhhhhhh
NEPHROTIC SYNDROME POWER POINT PRESENTATION
Advanced Nursing Procedures.....realted to advance nursing practice M.Sc. 1st...
unit 1 community health nursing , community
toxicosis in pregnancy preeclampcia eclampcia.ppt
Emotional Well Being & Conflict Resolution_VKV.pptx

Esophageal carcinoma

  • 2. Benign Esophageal Tumors and Cysts • Benign tumors are rare (< 1 %) • Classified in two groups – Mucosal – Extramucosal (intramural) • More useful classification: – 60% of benign neoplasms are leiomyomas – 20% are cysts – 5% are polyps – Others (< 2 percent)
  • 3. Leiomyomas • Most common benign tumor of the esophagus • Intramural in the circular muscle layer • Average age at presentation is 38; twice as common in males • 90% occur in lower 2/3 of esophagus • Obstruction and regurgitation may occur in large lesions • Dx: – barium swallow is the most useful method – CXR – endoscopy • Tx: majority can be removed by simple enucleation; large tumors or those involving the GEJ may require esophageal resection
  • 4. Esophageal Cysts • Arise as diverticula of the embryonic foregut of this cyst present in childhood • Over 60% are located along the right side of the esophagus • Enteric and bronchogenic cysts are the most common • 60% present in the first year of life with either respiratory or esophageal symptoms • Cyst found in the upper third of the esophagus present in infancy while lower third lesions present later in childhood • Surgical excision by enucleation is the preferred treatment
  • 5. Pedunculated Intraluminal Tumors (Polyps) • Benign polyps are rare • Usually occur in older men and may cause intermittent dysphagia • Are sometimes easily missed with barium swallow and esophagoscopy
  • 6. Malignant Tumors of the Esophagus • Usually are in advanced stages at the time of diagnosis (involving the muscular wall and extending into adjacent tissues) • Alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking seem to be the most consistent risk factors • Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (95% of all esophageal cancers) is a disease of men (5: 1) • Squamous cell esophageal cancer occurs least frequently in the cervical esophagus and • Squamous cell esophageal cancer occurs most often in the upper and midthoracic segments
  • 7. Malignant Tumors of the Esophagus • Adenocarcinoma constitute approximate 8% of primary esophageal cancers • Most often occur in the distal third of the esophagus in the 6th decade of life, but now occurs not only more frequently but in younger patients and is often detected at an earlier stage • Male to female ratio is 3:1 • Patients with Barretts metaplasia are 40 times more likely to develop adenocarcinoma • These tumors are aggressive as well
  • 8. Clinical Presentation • Dysphagia is the presenting complaint in 80- 90% of patients with esophageal carcinoma • Early symptoms are sometimes nonspecific retrosternal discomfort or indigestion • As the tumor enlarges, dysphagia becomes more progressive. • Later symptoms include weight loss, odynophagia, chest pain and hematemesis
  • 9. Diagnosis • Barium swallow has 92% accuracy – Identify abn peristalsis, mucosal irregularity and annular constructions • Fiberoptic endoscopy with biopsy and washings is confirmatory in 95% of cases • Bronchoscopy with biopsyto r/o involvement of bronchus in upper 2/3 tumors and synchronous lung primary • Nasopharyngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy to r/o synchronous head and neck lesions and vocal cord involvement • CT scan of chest with extension to liver and adrenals to assess tumor spread
  • 10. Staging of Tumors • Endoscopic ultrasound-to define the depth of invasion and presence of paraesophageal lymph nodes • Chest x-ray ± abnormal findings • CT scan (most widely used and now standard radiographic means of a staging) • Bronchoscopy for tumors which are proximal to the trachea
  • 11. The TNM classification • (a) “T” (depth of invasion of the primary tumor). • (b) “N” (regional lymph involvement). • (c) “M” (presence or absence of distant metastases).
  • 12. Primary Tumors (T) • Tx Primary tumor cannot be assessed (cytologically positive tumor not evident endoscopically or radiographically) • T0 No evidence of primary tumor (e.g., after treatment with radiation and chemotherapy) • Tis Carcinoma in situ • T1 Tumor invades lamina propria or submucosa, but not beyond it • T2 Tumor invades muscularis propria • T3 Tumor invades adventitia • T4 Tumor invades adjacent structures (e.g., aorta, tracheobronchial tree, vertebral bodies, pericardium)
  • 13. Regional Lymph Nodes (N) A. Nx Regional nodes cannot be assessed B. N0 No regional node metastasis C. N1 Regional node metastasis
  • 14. Distant Metastasis (M) 1. M0 No metastasis 2. M1 Distal metastasis
  • 15. Stage Grouping STAGE T N M Stage 0 Tis N0 M0 Stage I T1 N0 M0 Stage IIA T2 T3 N0 N0 M0 M0 Stage IIB T1 T2 N1 N1 M0 M0 Stage III T3 T4 N1 N1 M0 M0 Stage IV Any T Any N M1
  • 16. Treatment • Local tumor invasion or distant metastatic disease precludes cure. • Esophageal Ca is a systemic disease when it is diagnosed; local therapy (radiation or operation) is simply unable to eradicate this malignancy. • The 5-year survival rate in Western countries from esophageal Ca treated by either radiation or surgery is generally < 10% • More than 80% of the patients die within 1 year of diagnosis. Consequently, until very recently, the primary aim of therapy for esophageal carcinoma has been palliation (restoring the patient's ability to swallow). • Esophageal Ca is notorious for its ability to spread in the submucosal lymphatics well beyond the gross extent of the tumor • Resection to clear margins are therefore desirable to minimize the possibility of recurrent tumor at the anastomotic suture line.
  • 17. Surgery • Resection provides the best palliation for most patients with localized carcinoma. • Esophageal resection and reconstruction remain formidable operations in patients whose nutritional and pulmonary status have been compromised by impaired swallowing.
  • 18. Surgery Left thoracoabdominal incision – Is the approach to distal esophageal Ca. – Distal esophagus, proximal stomach, and adjacent LN-bearing tissues are resected, and intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis is performed. IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY – high intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis is performed. In either case, a gastric drainage procedure (pyloromyotomy or pyloroplasty) is recommended to prevent subsequent postvagotomy gastric outlet obstruction due to pylorospasm. – approach for higher thoracic esophageal tumors Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy (limited exposure of the intrathoracic esophagus and its blood supply and the risk of hemorrhage and the inability to carry out a complete mediastinal lymph node dissection ). Laryngopharyngocesophagectomy. For treatment of Ca involving the cervicothoracic esophagus (and frequently the larynx).
  • 19. Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy • Cervical (arrowhead) and upper abdominal midline (arrow) incisions are made. • Mobilization of the stomach for esophageal replacement is performed through a laparotomy with pyloroplasty. • The esophagus is mobilized from the back wall of the trachea through the cervical incision. • From below, the surgeon’s hand passes through the widened hiatus. Any remaining attachments of the muscular esophageal tube are avulsed from the esophageal wall.
  • 20. Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy Disadvantages: • limited exposure of the intrathoracic esophagus & its blood supply • the risk of hemorrhage • the inability to carry out a complete mediastinal lymph node dissection
  • 21. Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy (Orringer Technique) • The cervical esophagus is clamped, leaving adequate length for reconstruction • The esophagus is then extracted from the mediastinum. • The stomach is divided at the proximal region with a stapler or clamp Pyloromyotomy is performed at the distal portion • Remaining portion of the stomach is advanced to the neck for esophagogastric anastomosis.
  • 22. Left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy • the approach to distal esophageal Ca • Distal esophagus, proximal stomach, and adjacent LN-bearing tissues are resected • intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis is performed.
  • 23. IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY • approach for higher thoracic esophageal tumors • high intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis is performed • In either case, a gastric drainage procedure (pyloromyotomy or pyloroplasty) is recommended to prevent subsequent postvagotomy gastric outlet obstruction due to pylorospasm.
  • 24. Chemotherapy • No data proved that chemotherapy alone provides improved survival or palliation. • Single-agent chemotherapy used to treat many patients with esophageal Ca who present with distant disease, with cisplatin, mitomycin, and 5-fluorouracil achieving reported response rates of 35%. • Combination chemotherapy regimens such as: cisplatin, bleomycin, and vindesine or methotrexate; cisplatin, mitoguazone, and vindesine or vinblastine; and cisplatin and 5-fu used for metastatic or unresectable esophageal Ca, with reported response rates of 11- 55% for 3-9 months. • Combination chemotherapy has been used preoperatively in a combined modality approach to esophageal Ca in hopes of controlling occult metastatic disease and improving the resectability rate.
  • 25. Multimodality therapy • Because most patients have systemic or locally invasive disease that precludes cure, there is efforts to improve survival with multimodality therapy. • Experience with combined preoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy, as well as preoperative chemotherapy and postoperative adjuvant radiation, are encouraging. • This therapy provide better local-regional control of the tumor than can be achieved by radical resection of the esophagus alone.
  • 26. Transoral intubation • Uses a variety of tubes (Souttar, Mackler, Mousseau, Fell, and Celestin) and the Wilson-Cook and self-expanding stents, have been used to provide palliation. • Esophageal intubation carries an overall reported mortality that ranges from 3-15% and a complication rate of 20%. Complications: • 1. perforation of the esophagus • 2. migration of the tubes • 3. obstruction of the tubes by food • or tumor overgrowth.
  • 27. • Endoscopic laser therapy improves dysphagia, but multiple treatments are required and long- term benefit is seldom achieved. • Palliative internal bypass. Bypass of unresectable Ca with colonic interposition, gastric tubes or retrosternal gastric bypass as a method of palliation. • These procedures are of considerable magnitude and carry a high mortality rate and survival in these patients’ averages < 6 months.