Ethernet The Definitive Guide 2nd Edition Charles E. Spurgeon
Ethernet The Definitive Guide 2nd Edition Charles E. Spurgeon
Ethernet The Definitive Guide 2nd Edition Charles E. Spurgeon
Ethernet The Definitive Guide 2nd Edition Charles E. Spurgeon
1. Ethernet The Definitive Guide 2nd Edition
Charles E. Spurgeon pdf download
https://ebookfinal.com/download/ethernet-the-definitive-
guide-2nd-edition-charles-e-spurgeon/
Explore and download more ebooks or textbooks
at ebookfinal.com
2. We have selected some products that you may be interested in
Click the link to download now or visit ebookfinal.com
for more options!.
Automotive Ethernet the Definitive Guide 1.2 Edition Bob
Metcalfe
https://ebookfinal.com/download/automotive-ethernet-the-definitive-
guide-1-2-edition-bob-metcalfe/
Dictionary of e Business A Definitive Guide to Technology
and Business Terms 2nd Edition Francis Botto
https://ebookfinal.com/download/dictionary-of-e-business-a-definitive-
guide-to-technology-and-business-terms-2nd-edition-francis-botto/
Definitive Guide to Excel VBA 2nd Edition Michael Kofler
https://ebookfinal.com/download/definitive-guide-to-excel-vba-2nd-
edition-michael-kofler/
Managerial Accounting 2nd Edition Charles E. Davis
https://ebookfinal.com/download/managerial-accounting-2nd-edition-
charles-e-davis/
3. JavaScript The Definitive Guide Fourth Edition Flanagan
https://ebookfinal.com/download/javascript-the-definitive-guide-
fourth-edition-flanagan/
The Complete Guide to Online Stock Market Investing The
Definitive 20 Day Guide 2nd Edition Alexander Davidson
https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-complete-guide-to-online-stock-
market-investing-the-definitive-20-day-guide-2nd-edition-alexander-
davidson/
Cassandra The Definitive Guide 3rd Edition Jeff Carpenter
https://ebookfinal.com/download/cassandra-the-definitive-guide-3rd-
edition-jeff-carpenter/
Elasticsearch The Definitive Guide 1st Edition Clinton
Gormley
https://ebookfinal.com/download/elasticsearch-the-definitive-
guide-1st-edition-clinton-gormley/
The Seven Cs of Consulting The definitive guide to the
consulting process 2nd Edition Mick Cope
https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-seven-cs-of-consulting-the-
definitive-guide-to-the-consulting-process-2nd-edition-mick-cope/
5. Ethernet The Definitive Guide 2nd Edition Charles E.
Spurgeon Digital Instant Download
Author(s): Charles E. Spurgeon, Joann Zimmerman
ISBN(s): 9781449361846, 1449361846
Edition: 2
File Details: PDF, 19.42 MB
Year: 2014
Language: english
8. Charles E. Spurgeon and Joann Zimmerman
SECOND EDITION
Ethernet: The Definitive Guide
22. Preface
This is a book about Ethernet, the world’s most popular network technology, which
allows you to connect a variety of computers together with a low-cost and extremely
flexible network system. Ethernet is found on a wide variety of devices, and this wide‐
spread support, coupled with its low cost and high flexibility, are major reasons for its
popularity.
The Ethernet standard has grown to over 3,700 pages, and it covers a multitude of
Ethernet technologies designed for multiple environments. Ethernet is used to build
home networks, office and campus network systems, as well as wide area networks that
span cities and countries. There are Ethernet systems designed for networking a neigh‐
borhood, as well as Ethernets designed for networking inside automobiles to link the
multiple computers found there these days.
Thegoalofthisbookistoprovideacomprehensiveandpracticalsourceforinformation
on the most widely used Ethernet technologies in a single volume. This book describes
the varieties of Ethernet commonly used in homes, offices, and campus networks, as
well as several systems typically used in data centers and server machine rooms. These
include the most widely used set of Ethernet media systems: 10 Mb/s Ethernet, 100 Mb/s
Fast Ethernet, and 1000 Mb/s Gigabit Ethernet, as well as 10 Gigabit and 40 and 100
Gigabit Ethernet. We also describe full-duplex Ethernet, Ethernet Auto-Negotiation,
Power over Ethernet, Energy Efficient Ethernet, structured cabling systems, network
design with Ethernet switches, network management, network troubleshooting tech‐
niques, and more.
To provide the most accurate information possible, we referred to the complete set of
official Ethernet standards while writing this book. Our experience includes working
with Ethernet technology since the early 1980s, and many hard-won lessons in network
design and operation based on that experience have made their way into this edition.
xv
23. Ethernet Is Everywhere
Ethernet is the most widely used networking technology, and Ethernet networks are
everywhere. There are a number of factors that have helped Ethernet to become so
popular. Among these factors are cost, scalability, reliability, and widely available man‐
agement tools.
Cost
The rapid evolution of new capabilities in Ethernet has been accompanied by an equally
rapid decrease in the cost of Ethernet equipment. The widespread adoption of Ethernet
technology created a large and fiercely competitive Ethernet marketplace, which serves
to drive down the cost of networking components. The consumer wins out in the pro‐
cess, with the marketplace providing a wide range of competitively priced Ethernet
components to choose from.
Scalability
The first industry-wide Ethernet standard was published over 30 years ago, in 1980.
This standard defined a 10 megabits per second (Mb/s) system, which was very fast for
the time. The development of the 100 Mb/s Fast Ethernet system in 1995 provided a
tenfold increase in speed. Following on that success came the development of twisted-
pair Gigabit Ethernet in 1999. Network interfaces that can automatically support 10,
100, and 1000 Mb/s operation of twisted-pair media systems are widely available, mak‐
ing the support of high-performance networking easy to accomplish.
Applications tend to grow to fill all available bandwidth. To manage the constant in‐
crease in network usage, the 10 Gigabit Ethernet standard was developed in 2002, and
most recently the 40 and 100 Gigabit systems were standardized in 2010. All of this
progress in Ethernet capabilities makes it possible for a network manager to provide
high-speed backbone systems and connections to high-performance servers.
Desktop machines can be connected to an Ethernet link that can operate at 10 Mb/s
Ethernet, 100 Mb/s Fast Ethernet, or Gigabit Ethernet speeds, as required. Network
routers and switches can use 10 Gigabit and 40 or 100 Gigabit links for network back‐
bones, and data centers can connect to high-performance servers at 10, 40, or even 100
gigabits per second (Gb/s).
Reliability
Ethernet is simple and robust and reliably delivers data day in and day out at sites all
over the world. Ethernet based on twisted-pair media was introduced in 1987, making
it possible to provide Ethernet signals over a structured cabling system.
xvi | Preface
24. Structured cabling provides a data delivery system for a building that is modeled on
high-reliability cabling practices originally developed for the telephone system. This
makes it possible to install a standards-based cabling system for Ethernet that is highly
reliable and easy to manage.
Widely Available Management Tools
The widespread acceptance of Ethernet brings with it the wide availability of Ethernet
management and troubleshooting tools. Management tools based on standards such as
the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) make it possible for network ad‐
ministrators to keep track of an entire campus full of Ethernet equipment from a central
location. Management capabilities embedded in Ethernet switches and computer in‐
terfaces provide powerful network monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities.
Design for Reliability
Amajorgoalofthisbookistohelpyoudesignandimplementreliablenetworks,because
network reliability is of paramount importance to users and organizations. Access to
the Internet and information sharing between networked computers is an essential fea‐
ture of today’s world, and if the network fails, everything comes to a halt. This book
shows you how to design reliable networks, how to monitor them and keep them work‐
ing reliably, and how to fix them should something fail.
The wide range of Ethernet components and cabling systems available today provides
enormous flexibility, making it possible to build an Ethernet to fit just about any cir‐
cumstance. However, all this flexibility does have a price. The many varieties of Ethernet
each have their own components and their own configuration rules, which can make
the life of a network designer complex. Designing and implementing a reliable Ethernet
system requires that you understand how all the bits and pieces fit together, and that
you follow the official guidelines for the configuration of the media systems. To help
you with that task, this book provides the configuration guidelines for the widely used
media systems.
Downtime is Expensive
Avoiding network downtime is important for a number of reasons, not least of which
is the cost of a network outage. Some quick “back of the envelope” calculations can show
how expensive network downtime can be. Let’s assume that there are 1,000 network
users at the Amalgamated Widget Company, and that their average annual salary in‐
cluding all overhead (benefits, etc.) is $100,000. That comes to $100 million a year in
employee costs.
Let’s further assume that everyone in the company depends on the network to get their
work done, and that the network is used 40 hours a week, for about 50 weeks of the year.
Preface | xvii
25. That’s2,000hoursofnetworkoperation.Dividingtheannualemployeecostbythehours
of network operation shows that the network is supporting $50,000 per hour of em‐
ployee cost during the year.
Let’s further assume that when we total up all of the network outages over the period of
a year in our hypothetical corporation, we find that the network was down just 1% of
the time (99% uptime, or “two nines”). That sounds like really good uptime, but that
small fraction of 2,000 hours represents a total of 20 hours of network outage. Twenty
hours of network downtime at $50,000/hour is $1,000,000 in lost productivity due to
network outage.
Obviously,ourexampleisvery“quickanddirty.”Wedidn’tbothertocalculatetheimpact
of network outages during times when no one is around but when the network is still
nevertheless supporting critically important servers. Also, we’re assuming that a net‐
work failure brings all operations to a halt, instead of trying to factor in the varying
effects of localized failures that cause outages on only a portion of the network system.
Nordowetrytoestimatehowmuchotherworkpeoplecouldgetdonewhilethenetwork
is down, which would tend to lessen the impact.
However, the main point is clear: even relatively small amounts of network downtime
can cost quite a lot in lost productivity. That’s why it’s worth investing extra time, effort,
and money to create the most reliable network system you can afford.
How to Use This Book
The goal of this book is to provide the information needed for you to understand and
operate any Ethernet system. For example, if you are a newcomer to Ethernet and you
need to know how twisted-pair Ethernet systems work, then you can start with Part I.
After reading those chapters, you can go to the twisted-pair media chapters in Part II,
as well as the twisted-pair cabling information in Part III. Twisted-pair cables are con‐
nected together to form a network using switches, and these are described in Part IV.
Experts in Ethernet can use the book as a reference guide and jump directly to those
chapters that contain the information they need.
Organization of This Book
The purpose of this book is to provide a comprehensive and practical guide to the
Ethernet system and the Ethernet devices and components commonly used in office
and building networks. The emphasis is on practical issues, with minimal theory and
jargon. Chapters are kept as self-contained as possible, and many examples and illus‐
trations are provided. The book is organized into six parts to make it easier to find the
specific information you need.
xviii | Preface
28. Literary Jottings
HYLO-IDEALISM versus “LUCIFER,” and the “ADVERSARY.”
Under the head of Correspondence in the present number, two
remarkable letters are published. (See Text.) Both come from
fervent Hylo-Idealists—a Master and Disciple, if we mistake not—
and both charge the “Adversary,” one, of a “slighting,” the other,
of a “hostile notice” of Hylo-Idealism, in the September number
of “Lucifer.”
* *
Such an accusation is better met and answered in all sincerity;
and, therefore, the reply is, a flat denial of the charge. No slight
—nor hostility either, could be shown to “Hylo-Idealism,” as the
“little stranger” in the happy family of philosophies was hitherto
as good as unknown to “Lucifer’s” household gods. It was chaff,
if anything, but surely no hostility; and even that was concerned
with only some dreadful words and sentences, with reference to
the new teaching, and had nothing whatever to do with Hylo-
Idealism proper—a terra incognita for the writer at the time. But
now that three pamphlets from the pens of our two
correspondents have been received in our office, for review, and
carefully read, Hylo-Idealism begins to assume a more tangible
form before the reviewer’s eye. It becomes easier to separate
the grain from the chaff, the theory from the (no doubt)
scientific, nevertheless, most irritating, words in which it is
presented to the reader.
* *
This is meant in all truth and sincerity. The remarks which our
two correspondents have mistaken for expressions of hostility,
were as justified then, as they are now. What ordinary mortal,
we ask, before he had time (to use Dr. Lewins’ happiest
29. expressions) to “asself or cognose”—let alone intercranialise[121]
(!!)—the hylo-idealistic theories, however profound and
philosophical these may be, who, having so far come into direct
contact with only the images thereof “subjected by his own
egoity” (i.e. as words and sentences), who could avoid feeling
his hair standing on end, over “his organs of mentation,” while
spelling out such terrible words as “vesiculo-neurosis in
conjunction with medico-psychological symptomatology,” “auto-
centricism,” and the like? Such interminable, outlandish,
multisyllabled and multicipital, newly-coined compound terms
and whole sentences, maybe, and no doubt are, highly learned
and scientific. They may be most expressive of true, real
meaning, to a specialist of Dr. Lewins’ powers of thought;
nevertheless, I make bold to say, that they are far more
calculated to obscure than to enlighten the ordinary reader. In
our modern day, when new philosophies spring out from the
spawn of human overworked intellect like mushrooms from their
mycelium after a rainy morning, the human brain and its
capacities ought to be taken into a certain thoughtful
consideration, and spared useless labour. Notwithstanding Dr.
Lewins’ praiseworthy efforts to prove that brain (as far as we
understand his aspirations and teachings) is the only reality in
the whole kosmos, its limitations are painfully evident, on the
whole. As philanthropists and theosophists, we entreat the
founder of Hylo-Idealism and his disciples to be merciful to their
new god, the “Ego-Brain,” and not tax too heavily its powers, if
they would see it happily reign. For otherwise, it is sure to
collapse before the new theory—or, let us call it philosophy—is
even half appreciated by that “Ego-Brain.”
* *
By speaking as we do, we are only pursuing a life-long policy.
We have criticized and opposed the coinage of hard Greek and
Latin words by the New York Pantarchists; laughed at Hæckel’s
pompous tendency to invent thirty-three syllabled terms, and
speak of the perigenesis of plastidules, instead of honest
30. whirling atoms—or whatever he means; and derided the modern
psychists for calling simple thought transference “telepathic
impact.” And now, we tearfully beg Dr. Lewins, in the interests of
humanity, to have pity on his poor readers: for, unless he
hearkens to our advice, we shall be compelled, in dire self-
defence, to declare an open war to his newly-coined words. We
shall fight the usurper “Solipsism” in favour of the legitimate king
of the Universe—Egoism—to our last breath.
* *
At the same time, as we have hitherto been ignorant of the
latest philosophy, described by Mr. H. L. Courtney as “the
greatest change in human thought,” may we be permitted to
enquire whether it is spelt as its Founder spells it, namely, “Hylo-
Idealism,” or as his disciple, Mr. Courtney does, who writes Hylo-
Ideaism? Is the latter a schism, an improvement on the original
name, a lapsus calami, or what? And now, having disburdened
our heart of a heavy weight, we may proceed to give an opinion
(so far very superficial), on the three Hylo-Idealistic (or Ideaistic)
pamphlets.
Under the extraordinary title of “AUTO-CENTRICISM” and
“HUMANISM versus THEISM,” or “Solipsism (Egoism)=Atheism”
(W. Stewart & Co., 41, Farringdon Street, E.C.; and Freethought
Publishing Co., 63, Fleet Street, E.C.)—Dr. Lewins publishes a
series of letters on the subject of the philosophy of which he is
the founder. It is impossible not to feel admiration for the
manner in which these letters are written. They show a great
deal of sincere conviction and deep thought, and give evidence
of a most wide and varied reading. However his readers may
dissent from the writer’s conclusions, the research with which he
has strengthened his theory, cannot fail to attract their attention,
and smooth their way through the somewhat tortuous labyrinth
of arguments before them. But—
31. Dr. Lewins is among those who regard consciousness as a
function of the nerve-tissue; and in this aspect, he is an
uncompromising materialist. Yet, on the other hand, he holds
that the Universe, God, and thought, have no reality whatever,
apart from the individual Ego. The Ego is again resolvable into
brain-process. We thus arrive at the doctrine that Brain is the
workshop in which all our ideas of external things are originated.
Apart from brain there is no Ego, no external world. What, then,
is the Brain itself—this solitary object in a void universe? Hylo-
Idealism does not say. Thus, the author cannot escape the
confusion of thought which his unique working-union of
materialism and idealism involves. The oscillation between these
two poles is strikingly apparent in the subjoined quotations. At
one point Matter is discussed as if it were an objective reality; at
another, it is regarded as a mere “phantasm of the Ego.” The
Brain alone survives throughout in solitary state. We quote from
the two pamphlets—
Matter Asserted.
“Matter, organic and inorganic, is now fully known ... to perform all material
operations.”
—Auto-Centricism, p. 40.
“Man is all body and matter.”
—Do, p. 40.
“Abstract thought [is] neuropathy ... disease of the nervous centres.”
—Humanism versus Theism, p. 25.
“What we call mind ... is a function of certain nerve structures in the
organism.”
—Humanism v. Theism, p. 24.
Matter Denied.
“All discovery is ... a subjective phenomenon.”
—Humanism v. Theism, p. 17.
“All things are for us but modes of perception.”—[Mental figments].
The “celestial vault and garniture of Earth,” are “a mere projection of our
own inner consciousness.”
—Humanism v. Theism, p. 17.
“We get rid of Matter altogether.”
—Humanism v. Theism, p. 17.
32. “The whole objective world ... is phenomenal or ideal.”
—Auto-Centricism, p. 9.
“Everything is spectral” (i.e., unreal).
—Ibid, p. 13.
Matter is at one time credited with a real being, and again
resolved into a mere mental figment as circumstances demand.
If Matter is, as the author frequently states, unreal, it is, at least
clear that the brain, one of its many phases, goes with it!!
As to the learned doctor’s assertion that perception is relative,
a theory which runs through his whole work, we have but one
answer. This conception is, in no sense whatever, a monopoly of
Hylo-Idealists, as Dr. Lewins appears to think. The illusory nature
of the phenomenal world—of the things of sense—is not only a
belief common to the old Brahminical metaphysics, and to the
majority of modern psychologists, but it is also a vital tenet of
Theosophy. The latter distinctly realises matter as a “bundle of
attributes,” ultimately resolvable into the subjective sensations of
a “percipient.” The connection of this simple truth with the hylo-
idealistic denial of soul is not apparent. Its acceptance has, also,
no bearing on the problem as to whether there may not exist a
duality—within the limits of manifested being—or contrast
between Mind and the Substance of matter. This Cosmic Duality
is symbolised by the Vedantins in the relations between the
Logos and Mulaprakriti—i.e., the Universal Spirit and the
“material” basis (or root) of the objective planes of nature. The
Monism, then, of Dr. Lewins and other negative thinkers of the
day, is evidently at fault, when applied to unify the contrast of
mental and material facts in the conditioned universe. Beyond
the latter, it is indeed valid, but that is scarcely a question for
practical philosophy.
To close with a reference this once to Dr. Lewins’ letter (see
“Correspondence” in the text), in which he makes his
subsequent assertion to the effect that God is the “functional
(sic) image,” of the Ego, we should prefer to suggest that all
individual “selves” are but dim reflections of the universal soul of
33. the Kosmos. The orthodox concept of God is not, as he
contends, a myth or phantasm of the brain; it is rather an
expression of a vague consciousness of the universal, all-
pervading Logos. It is because Self pinions man within a narrow
sphere “beyond which mortal mind can never range,” that the
destruction of the personal sense of separateness is
indispensable to the Occultist.
“THE NEW GOSPEL OF HYLO-IDEALISM, or Positive
Agnosticism,” (Freethought Publishing Co., 73, Fleet Street, E. C.
Price 3d.), is another pamphlet on the same subject, in which Mr.
Herbert L. Courtney contributes his quota to the discussion of
the “Brain Theory of mind and matter.” He is, if we mistake not,
an avowed disciple of Dr. Lewins, and, perhaps, identical with
the “C. N.,” who watched over the cradle of the “new
philosophy.” The whole gist of the latter may be summed up as
an attempt to frame a working-union of Materialism and
Idealism. This result is effected on two lines (1) in the
acceptance of the idealistic theorem, that the so-called external
world only exists in our consciousness; and (2) in the
designation of that consciousness, in its turn, as a mere function
of Brain. The first of these contentions is unquestionably valid, in
so far as it concerns the world of appearances, or Maya; it is,
however, as “old as the hills,” and incorporated into the Hylo-
Ideal argument from anterior sources. The second is untenable,
for the simple reason that on the premises of the new creed
itself, the brain, as an object of perception, can possess no
reality outside of the Ego. Hegelians might reply that Brain is but
an i.e. of the Ego, and cannot hence determine the existence of
the latter—its creator.
Metaphysicism will, however, find much to interest them in Mr.
Courtney’s brochure, representative, as it is, of the new and
more subtle phase into which modern scepticism is entering.
34. Some expressions we may demur to—e.g., “That which we see
is not Sirius, but the light-wave.” So far from the light-wave
being “seen,” it is a mere working hypothesis of Science. All we
experience is the retinal sensation, the objective counterpart to
which is a matter of pure inference. So far as we can learn, Hylo-
Idealism is chiefly based upon gigantic paradoxes, and even
contradictions in terms. For, with regard to the speculations
anent the Noumenon (p. 8.) what justification can be found for
terming it “Matter,” especially as it is said to be “unknowable”?
Obviously it may be of the nature of mind, or—something Higher.
How is the Hylo-Idealist to know?
“LAYS OF ROMANCE AND CHIVALRY,” by Mr. W. Stewart Ross.
(Stewart and Co., Farringdon Street.) In this neat little volume
the author presents to the reader a collection of vigorous verse,
mostly of chivalrous character. Some of these pieces, such as the
“Raid of Vikings” and “Glencoe,” are of merit, despite an
occasional echo of Walter Scott, whose style seems to have had
a considerable modifying influence on the author’s diction. It is in
the “Bride of Steel” that this feature is most noticeable—
“I love thee with a warrior’s love,
My Sword, my Life, my Bride!
Dear, dear as ever knighthood bore,
Though yet no gout of battle-gore
Thy virgin blade hath dyed!”
Apart from this unconscious influence of the great Scottish
bard, the ring of originality and feeling which characterises Mr.
Stewart Ross’s poetry is most refreshing. The little volume
sparkles with the vein of romance, and after perusing it, in spite
of occasional anachronisms and other literary errors, we are not
surprised to hear of the favourable reception hitherto accorded
to it.
35. In the Secular Review for November 26th, Mr. Beatty makes an
attack upon a former article in Lucifer, entitled “The Origin of
Evil.” We find, however, Mr. Beatty exhibiting crass ignorance of
the ideas he criticises, as when, for instance, he speaks of the
“Buddhistic” Parabram (sic). To begin with, every tyro in Oriental
philosophy knows that “Parabrahm” is a Hindu Vedantic idea,
and has no connection whatever with Buddhist thought. If Mr.
Beatty wishes to become a serious critic, he must first learn the
a, b, c, of the subject with which he professes to deal. His article
is unfinished, but it seems only fair at the present stage to call
his attention to so glaring an error.
THE GNOSTICS AND THEIR REMAINS, ANCIENT AND
MEDIÆVAL. By C. W. King, M.A. Second Edition. David Nutt, 270
Strand, London, 1887. pp. 466, 8vo.
It would be unfair to the erudite and painstaking author of
“The Gnostics and Their Remains” for a reviewer to take the title
of his book as altogether appropriate, for it suggests too high a
standard of criticism. Mr. King says in the introduction that his
book is intended to be subsidiary to the valuable treatise of M.
Matter, adding: “I refer the reader to him for the more complete
elucidation of the philosophy of Gnosticism, and give my full
attention to its Archæological side.” The italics are the author’s,
and they disarm criticism as far as the philosophical side of
Gnosticism is concerned; for thus italicised, this passage is, at
the outset, as plain a confession as could, in conscience, be
expected of an author of a fact which the reader would probably
have found out for himself, before he closed the volume: namely,
that the work is chiefly valuable as an Archæological
compendium of “Gnostic Remains.” Unfortunately, the most
interesting point about the Gnostics is their philosophy, of which
their Archæological remains are, properly speaking, little more
than illustrations. But the fact is, that the hard-shelled
Archæologist is the last man in the world to appreciate the real
esoteric signification of symbolism. All true symbols have many
36. meanings, and for the purposes of descriptive Archæology the
more superficial of these meanings are sufficient. Ignorance of
the deeper meaning may indeed be bliss for the Archæologist,
for it necessitates an amount of ingenuity in the fitting together
of “remains,” that commands the admiration of the public, and is
productive in the Archæological bosom of that agreeable
sensation known as “fancying oneself.” As a laborious collector
and compiler, and an ingenious worker-up of materials into
interesting reading, too much can hardly be said in Mr. King’s
praise, and had he a greater intuitional power, and a knowledge
of esoteric religion, his great industry and erudition would make
his writings valuable even to students of Occultism.
Since the publication of the former edition of his work, twenty-
three years ago, Mr. King has come across and read the Pistis
Sophia. The discovery of this, the only remaining Gnostic Gospel,
or rather, Gospel fragment, is attributed to Schwartze, and the
Latin translation to Petermann (in 1853). But Mr. King does not
seem to be aware that as far back as 1843, another and ampler
copy than that in the British Museum was in the hands of a
Russian Raskolnik (dissident), a Cossack, who lived and married
in Abyssinia; and another is in the possession of an Englishman,
an Occultist, now in the United States, who brought it from
Syria. It seems a pity that in the interim Mr. King did not also
read Isis Unveiled, by H. P. Blavatsky, published by Bouton in
New York in 1876, as its perusal would have saved him a
somewhat absurd and ludicrous blunder. In his Preface, Mr. King
says:—“There seems to be reason for suspecting that the Sibyl
of Esoteric Buddhism drew the first notions of her new religion
from the analysis of the inner man, as set forth in my first
edition.”[122]
The only person to whom this passage could apply is
one of the Editors, the author of Isis Unveiled. And this, her first
publication, contains the same and only doctrine she has always,
or ever, promulgated. Isis Unveiled has passed through eight
editions, and has been read by many thousands of persons; and
not only they, but everyone who is not strangely ignorant of the
very literature with which it was Mr. King’s business to make
37. himself conversant, are perfectly aware that the two large
volumes which compose that work are entirely devoted to a
defence of the philosophy, science, and religion of the ancients,
especially of the old Aryans, whose religion can hardly be called
a “new” one, still less—“Esoteric Buddhism.” If properly spelt,
however, the latter word, or Buddhism, ought to be written with
one “d,” as in this case it means Wisdom. But “Budhism,” or the
wisdom-religion of the Aryans, was still less a religion, in the
exoteric sense, than is Buddhism, but rather a philosophy. In
that part of Isis Unveiled which treats of the Gnostics, Mr. King
will find a few quotations from his writings side by side with
quotations from other writers on the same subject; but he will
find no “new religion” there, or anywhere else, in the works of H.
P. Blavatsky. And, if anyone drew the “first notions” of their
religion from his “analysis of the inner man,” it must have been
the early Aryans, who, unfortunately, have neglected to
acknowledge the obligation. What makes Mr. King’s self-
complacency the more ridiculous, is that in his preface he
himself accuses someone else of “the grave error of representing
their (the Gnostics’) doctrines as novel, and the pure inventions
of the persons who preached them.” And in another place he
confesses that he owes to Matter the first idea which has now
become a settled conviction with him, that “the seeds of the
gnosis were originally of Indian growth.” If Matter “faintly
discerned” this truth, on the other hand Bailly, Dupuis, and
others had seen it quite clearly, and had declared it most
emphatically. So that Mr. King’s “discovery” is neither very new
nor very original.
Mr. King must be aware that of late years immense additions
have been made to western knowledge of eastern philosophies
and religions—a new region in ancient literature having, in fact,
been opened up by the labours of Orientalists, both European
and Eastern. A study of these Oriental systems throws a strong
though often a false light upon the inner meaning of Gnostic
symbolism and ideas generally, which Mr. King acknowledges to
have come from Indian sources; and certainly the reader has a
38. right to expect a little more knowledge in that direction from a
writer of Mr. King’s pretensions, than is displayed. For example,
in the section about Buddhism in the work before us: one is
tempted sometimes to ask whether it is flippancy or superficiality
that is the matter with the author—when he calls the ancient
Indian gymnosophists “fakirs,” and confounds them with
Buddhists. Surely he need hardly be told that fakirs are
Mahomedans, and that the Gymnosophists he mentions were
Brahmin Yogis.
The work, however, is a valuable one in its way; but the reader
should not forget that “there seems reason for suspecting” that
the author does not always know exactly what he is talking
about, whenever he strays too far from Archæology, on which he
is no doubt an authority.
THE JEWISH WORLD enters bravely enough (in its issue of the
11th November 1887) on its new character of professor of
symbology and History. It accuses in no measured terms one of
the editors of Lucifer of ignorance; and criticises certain
expressions used in our October number, in a foot-note inserted
to explain why the “Son of the Morning” Lucifer is called in Mr. G.
Massey’s little poem, “Lady of Light.” The writer objects, we see,
to Lucifer-Venus being called in one of its aspects “the Jewish
Astoreth;” or to her having ever been offered cakes by the Jews.
As explained in a somewhat confused sentence: “There was no
Jewish Astoreth, though the Syrian goddess, Ashtoreth, or
Astarte, often appears in Biblical literature, the moon goddess,
the complement of Baal, the Sun God.”
This, no doubt, is extremely learned and conveys quite new
information. Yet such an astounding statement as that the whole
of the foot-note in Lucifer is “pure imagination and bad history”
is very risky indeed. For it requires no more than a stroke or two
of our pen to make the whole edifice of this denial tumble on the
Jewish World and mangle it very badly. Our contemporary has
evidently forgotten the wise proverb that bids one to let
39. “sleeping dogs lie,” and therefore, it is with the lofty airs of
superiority that he informs his readers that though the Jews in
Palestine lived surrounded with (? sic) this pagan form of
worship, and may, at times, (?!) have wandered towards it, they
had nothing in their worship in common with Chaldean or Syrian beliefs
in multiplicity of deities? (!!)
This is what any impartial reader might really term “bad
history,” and every Bible worshipper describe as a direct lie given
to the Lord God of Israel. It is more than suppressio veri
suggestio falsi, for it is simply a cool denial of facts in the face of
both Bible and History. We advise our critic of the Jewish World
to turn to his own prophets, to Jeremiah, foremost of all. We
open “Scripture” and find in it: “the Lord God” while accusing his
“backsliding Israel and treacherous Judah” of following in “the
ways of Egypt and of Assyria,” of drinking the waters of Sihor,
and “serving strange Gods” enumerating his grievances in this
wise:
“According to the number of thy cities are thy gods, O Judah, (Jer. ii. 28.).
“Ye have turned back to the iniquities of your forefathers who went after
other gods to serve them (xi.) ... according to the number of the streets of
Jerusalem have ye set up altars to that shameful thing, even altars unto Baal”
(Ib.).
So much for Jewish monotheism. And is it any more “pure
imagination” to say that the Jews offered cakes to their Astoreth
and called her “Queen of Heaven”? Then the “Lord God” must,
indeed, be guilty of more than “a delicate expansion of facts”
when thundering to, and through, Jeremiah:—
“Seest thou not what they do in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of
Jerusalem? The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the
women knead their dough TO MAKE CAKES to the Queen of Heaven, and to pour
out drink offerings unto the gods.” (Jer. vii. 17-18).
“The Jews may AT TIMES” only (?) have wandered towards
pagan forms of worship but “had nothing in common in it with
Syrian beliefs in multiplicity of deities.” Had they not? Then the
40. ancestors of the editors of the Jewish World must have been the
victims of “suggestion,” when, snubbing Jeremiah (and not
entirely without good reason),they declared to him:
“As for the word that thou hast spoken unto us in the name of the Lord, we
will not hearken unto thee. But we will certainly do whatsoever thing goeth
forth out of our own mouth, to burn incense unto the Queen of Heaven[123] ...
as we have done, we, AND OUR FATHERS, our kings, and our princes, in the cities
of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem, for then had we plenty of victuals,
and were well, and saw no evil. But since we left off to burn incense to the
Queen of Heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto her ... and (to) make
her cakes to worship her ... we have wanted all things, and have been
consumed by the sword and by the famine....” (Jer. xliv. 16, 17, 18, 19).
Thus, according to their own confession, it is not “at times”
that the Jews made cakes for, and worshipped Astoreth and the
strange gods, but constantly: doing, moreover, as their
forefathers, kings and princes did.
“Bad history”? And what was the “golden calf” but the sacred
heifer, the symbol of the “Great Mother,” first the planet Venus,
and then the moon? For the esoteric doctrine holds (as the
Mexicans held) that Venus, the morning star, was created before
the sun and moon; metaphorically, of course, not astronomically,
[124]
the assumption being based upon, and meaning that which
the Nazars and the Initiate alone understood among the Jews,
but that the writers of the Jewish World are not supposed to
know. For the same reason the Chaldeans maintained that the
moon was produced before the sun (see Babylon—Account of
Creation, by George Smith). The morning star, Lucifer-Venus was
dedicated to that Great Mother symbolized by the heifer or the
“Golden Calf.” For, as says Mr. G. Massey in his lecture on “The
Hebrews and their Creations,” “This (the Golden Calf) being of
either sex, it supplied a twin-type for Venus, as Hathor or Ishtar
(Astoreth), the double star, that was male at rising, and female
at sunset” She is the “Celestial Aphrodite,” Venus Victrix
νιχηφόρος associated with Ares (see Pausanias i, 8, 4, 11, 25, 1).
We are told that “happily for them (the Jews) there was no
Jewish Astoreth.” The Jewish World has yet to learn, we see,
41. that there would have been no Greek Venus Aphrodite; no
Ourania, her earlier appellation; nor would she have been
confounded with the Assyrian Mylitta (Herod, 1, 199; Pausan., 1,
14, 7; Hesiod, Μυληταν την Ουρανιαν Ασσυριοι) had it not been
for the Phœnicians and other Semites. We say the “Jewish
Astoreth,” and we maintain what we say, on the authority of the
Iliad, the Odyssey, of Renan, and many others. Venus Aphrodite
is one with the Astarte, Astoreth, etc. of the Phœnicians, and
she is one (as a planet) with “Lucifer” the “Morning Star.” So far
back as the days of Homer, she was confounded with Kypris, an
Oriental goddess brought by the Phœnician Semites from their
Asiatic travels (Iliad, V, 330, 422, 260). Her worship appears first
at Cythere, a Phœnician settlement depôt or trade-establishment
(Odys., VIII. 362.; Walcker, griech. götterl. I, 666.) Herodotus
shows that the sanctuary of Ascalon, in Syria, was the most
ancient of the fanes of Aphrodite Ourania (I, 105): and
Decharme tells us in his Mythologie de la Grèce Antique, that
whenever the Greeks alluded to the origin of Aphrodite they
designated her as Ourania, an epithet translated from a semitic
word, as Jupiter Epouranios of the Phœnician inscriptions, was
the Samemroum of Philo of Byblos, according to Renan (Mission
de Phenicie). Astoreth was a goddess of generation, presiding at
human birth (as Jehovah was god of generation, foremost of all).
She was the moon-goddess, and a planet at the same time,
whose worship originated with the Phœnicians and Semites. It
flourished most in the Phœnician settlements and colonies in
Sicily, at Eryax. There hosts of Hetairae were attached to her
temples, as hosts of Kadeshim, called by a more sincere name in
the Bible, were, to the house of the Lord, “where the women
wove hangings for the grove” (II. Kings, xxiii, 7). All this shows
well the Semitic provenance of Astoreth-Venus in her capacity of
“great Mother.” Let us pause. We advise sincerely the Jewish
World to abstain from throwing stones at other peoples’ beliefs,
so long as its own faith is but a house of glass. And though
Jeremy Taylor may think that “to be proud of one’s learning is
the greatest ignorance,” yet, in this case it is but simple justice
42. to say that it is really desirable for our friends the Jews that the
writer in Lucifer of the criticised note about Astoreth should know
less of history and the Bible, and her unlucky critic in the Jewish
World learn a little more about it.
“Adversary.”
43. Theosophical
and Mystic Publications
THE THEOSOPHIST for October opens with the first of a series
of articles on the “Elohistic Cosmogony.” The views put forward
by the writer are certainly both striking and original, and,
although Dr. Pratt diverges very considerably from the
recognised standard of kabalistic orthodoxy, his interpretation of
the Jewish version of cosmic evolution will assuredly excite
considerable interest.
Following on Dr. Pratt’s learned article, come a few—
unfortunately, too few—pages of extremely interesting notes on
the Folk-lore of the Himalayan tribes, contributed by Captain
Banon. The Theosophist has often been indebted to Captain
Banon for similar notes respecting such little known tribes and
people; and it is much to be regretted that the many members
of the Theosophical Society who reside in or visit such out-of-
the-way places, do not make it a rule to collect these traditions
and send them for publication in the Theosophist or one of the
other Theosophical magazines.
Dr. Hartmann continues his series of “Rosicrucian Letters,” with
a number of extracts from the papers of Karl von Eckartshausen,
who died in 1792. Dr. Hartmann deserves the gratitude of all
students for rendering accessible these records and notes of past
generations of “seekers after the Truth.”
Dr. Buck contributes a pithy and thoughtful article on “The
Soul Problem,” and Mr. Lazarus continues his exposition of the
kabalistic doctrine of the Microcosm. Besides these there are
further instalments of two valuable translations from Hindu
works of great antiquity and authority; the “Crest Jewel of
44. Wisdom,” by Sankaracharya and the “Kaivalyanita.” It is much to
be desired that one of our Hindu brothers, who adds to a
knowledge of his own mystic literature, an acquaintance with
Western modes of thought and expression, would devote a
series of articles to the exposition of the fundamental standpoint
and ideas of such works as these. Such an article would add
enormously to the value of these translations to the Western
world.
In the November number, Dr. Pratt takes up the Jehovistic
cosmogony, which he contrasts and compares with the Elohistic
version already referred to. In his view, the Jehovistic teaching
embodies the conception of the world as “created” and “ruled”
by an extra-natural and personal deity, as opposed to the more
philosophical and pantheistic conception of the earlier Elohistic
writers.
Under the title of An Ancient Weapon, this issue contains an
instructive account of the evocation of certain astral forces
according to the ancient Vedic rites. As here described, the evil
intention, with which the rite is performed, transforms it into a
ceremony of Black Magic, but this does not render the account
any less valuable.
This is followed by the first of a series of articles on The
Allegory of the Zoroastrian Cosmogony, which promises to
furnish much food for thought and study.
Rosicrucian Letters contains this time an extract from an old
MS., headed The Temple of Solomon, which is well worthy of
careful attention.
Besides these we have a sketch of the life and writings of
Madvachary, the great teacher of Southern India, and some
further testimonies to the fact of “self-levitation” from eye-
witnesses. Rama Prasad gives some most valuable details of the
“Science of Breathing,” one of the most curious branches of
occult physics, while the remainder of the number is occupied by
an article on “Tetragrammaton,” which may be interesting to
students of the Kabbala, and continuations of the “Kabbala and
45. the Microcosm,” and of the translations from Indian books
mentioned in connection with the October number.
These two numbers contain much valuable matter and well
maintain the reputation which the Theosophist originally gained
for itself.
In THE PATH for October we notice especially the following
articles:
Nature’s Scholar, a most poetically-conceived and well-worked-
out Idyll, by J. C. Ver Plank, in which the underlying occult truth
is presented to the reader in a most attractive form.
Following this is a much needed warning against the dangers
of Astral Intoxication. Admirably expressed, it points out the
true, and indicates the false, path with great clearness; and we
desire to call the earnest attention of such of our readers as are
engaged in psychic development to its importance.
“Pilgrim” contributes some further Thoughts in Solitude, the
leading idea of which may be indicated by its concluding lines,
which are quoted from Sir Philip Sydney of heroic fame:
“Then farewell, World! thy uttermost I see,
Eternal Love, maintain thy life in me!”
Tea-Table Talk is even more interesting and suggestive than
usual, and, besides those above mentioned, this well-filled
number contains Part IV. of the series of articles on The Poetry
of Re-incarnation in Western Literature, which deals with the
Platonic Poets.
The November number opens with an able continuation of Mr.
Brehon’s article on The Bhagavat-Gita, commenced so long ago
as last April, of which we hope to peruse a further instalment.
Following this is a short article indicating the term “Medium”
from the loathsome connotations which phenomenal spiritualism
has attached to it. We then come to a paper on Goethe’s Faust,
read before one of the branches of the Theosophical Society in
46. America. It is of great interest to students of literature and will
furnish a clue to the real meaning of much of the poet’s writing.
Mr. Johnston makes some most suggestive remarks on Cain
and Abel; Harij speaks in no uncertain tones of Personalities and
Truth, while Hadji Erinn points out the Path of Action, and warns
the members of the T. S. that they must not expect their road to
become easier and plainer before them, while yet the society is
undergoing the trials of its education.
Zadok gives some able answers to questions on various points
of practical occultism and Julius, in Tea-Table Talk, points out
how many people are really entering on the path of Theosophy—
even though unconsciously.
LE LOTUS, for October and November, is even more interesting
than usual. In the October number are contained two very
valuable articles. The first of these is a paper on Paracelsus from
the pen of Dr. Hartmann, who is especially qualified to handle
the subject by his profound study of the work, and especially the
manuscripts, of that great occultist. M. “Papus” contributes a
most lucid and able exposition of some Kabbalistic doctrines, the
practical value of which has been hitherto but little realised even
by professed students of mysticism.
The opening article in the November issue is headed, The
Constitution of the Microcosm. It is written in a clear and
attractive style, and contains a most thorough and complete
explanation of the various classifications of the principles which
enter into the constitution of man.
“Amaravella” has evidently studied the whole subject very
deeply, and he shows the relation of these various classifications
to one another in a way which will clear up many of the
misconceptions which have arisen.
M. “Papus” writes on Alchemy in a manner which shows how
conversant he is with this little-understood topic. We therefore
look forward with great anticipations to the perusal of his book
47. “Traité élémentaire de science occulte,” the fourth chapter of
which contains the article referred to.
It is very evident that Theosophy is making great and rapid
progress in France, and this is in great measure due to the
untiring and unselfish devotion of the editor of Le Lotus, M.
Gaboriau, whom we congratulate most warmly on the success
which has attended his efforts.
L’Aurore for October contains an article on the so-called “Star
of Bethlehem,” which repeats the assurance that the world is
entering on a new and happier life-phase.
Unfortunately, it seems more than probable that before this
amelioration takes place, the world must pass through the valley
of the shadow of Death, and endure calamities far worse than
any it has yet seen. Lady Caithness continues her erudite and
interesting article on the lost ten tribes of Israel. Her thesis is put
forward in admirable language, and supported by a great wealth
of biblical quotations. Unfortunately, the task undertaken is an
impossible one. There never were twelve tribes of Israel—two
only—Judah and the Levites, having had a real existence in the
flesh. The remainder are but euhemerizations of the signs of the
Zodiac, and were introduced because they were necessary to the
Kabalistic scheme on which the “History” of the Jews was
written.
Lady Barrogill relates the well-known story of an English
bishop and the ghost of a Catholic priest, who haunted his
former residence in order to secure the destruction of some
notes he had taken (contrary to the rule of the Church) of an
important confession which he had heard.
Besides these articles we find the continuation of the serial
romance, “L’amour Immortel,” and Lucifer has to thank the
editor for the appreciative notice contained in this number.
58. S. Mark, iv. 11; Matthew, xiii. 11; Luke, viii. 10.
48. 59. So medicine is, in the Shakespearian use of the word, and also from its
Greek derivation, not to give drugs, but to cure or heal.
60. The discoverer of the new power now known as the Keeley-motor and
inter-etheric force.
61. Co-operative, that is to say, in the sense that the various sections and
individual members of society shall willingly co-operate, being fully conscious
of their interdependance.
St. George Lane Fox.
62. Socialists who consider their Christianity to supply them with sufficient
motives for their Socialism. They do not strictly form a sect either of Socialists
or of Christians.
63. This word, of course, is employed in the general sense, without any
reference to the physical character which the revolution may assume. It may
be attended with violence, or it may be as peaceful as, for instance, the
religious revolution accomplished by Constantine in the fourth century. All I
am postulating is a more or less sudden transformation of the existing social
order, effected by one of those impulses with which evolution seems to
complete its periods, and of which Theosophy may some day afford the
explanation.
64. The only kind to which T. B. H.’s remarks are in any way applicable.
65. I do not, of course, mean to predict that “sin” (or its Theosophical
equivalent) would die out. It is, after all, a relative matter to the capacities
and potentialities of the individual and his surroundings. Under Socialism,
sensuality, social or plutocratic pride, and other sins fostered by the present
order, would simply give way to ambition (to obtain popular distinction, e.g.,
as an artist or inventor) and perhaps to magic and other at present
unfashionable vices.
66. It is somewhat difficult to follow the argument of this passage, unless
the meaning of the words is explained. The Lion of the House of Judah is
equivalent to “the Lord” and to “the Victor” mentioned below. In the writer’s
phraseology “Victor is the symbol of the Trinity of Wisdom, Love, Truth.” Now
the Lion is symbolical of Wisdom; but, as it is impossible to sever one element
of the Trinity from another, it is necessary to remember that whenever the
word wisdom is used it carries with it the other two as well. The above
sentence would then seem to mean the conjunction of the male and female
principles to effect the purpose of the manifestation of the Trinity above
mentioned; by which manifestation all ignorance is dispelled. [Ed.]
49. 67. Judah means praised; the true idea being the Lord be praised. Too
much attention cannot be paid to the meanings of the words used in the
sacred writings of all nations and peoples.
68. i.e. the Queen, on whose lands the Sun never sets; it must be
remembered that—“neither is the woman without the man, nor the man
without the woman in the Lord.”—(1 Corinthians xi, 11.)
69. “And no man can say Jesus is Lord (i.e. Victor), but in the Holy Spirit.”—
(1 Corinthians xii., 3, Revised Version.) It is especially necessary to remember
that whenever allusion is made to Victoria, it is not Her Most Gracious Majesty
who is meant but the unseen Victoria whose outward manifestation the
Queen is alleged to be. It is as though the Queen is the mouth-piece of the
intelligence behind, as the Foreign Secretary may be the mouth-piece of the
Foreign policy of the Government. The language used is purely symbolical and
by using words as symbols an esoteric meaning is attached to the most
commonplace events in life. It is a truly occult argument, but one which
matter-of-fact people will regard as nonsensical. [Ed.]
70. According to the explanations of the writer (v. supra), The World
signifies a state of ignorance and darkness. Taken in this sense the above
sentence becomes a truism. [Ed.]
71. Ignorance is the equivalent of the Body, which is the Cross. By this light
the Wisdom means the life of the Spirit. [Ed.]
72. To say that Man was created ignorant for a great purpose would argue
the idea of a creator, according to orthodox ideas. But the writer is known to
repudiate this idea entirely. It is difficult, therefore, to see what he means,
unless it is that the man of flesh was ushered into existence by an evolution
which he has not yet completed—ignorant, to acquire knowledge gradually.
[Ed.]
73. This is a very optimistic view of the case, and we can only hope to see
it realised. The article “Signs of the Times” agrees with the views of the writer
of this article. There is a development going on, but the forces against which
it has to contend are too dense for an early realisation of this dreamlike
Golden Age. It is too good to be true; but that it is possible to help it is also
true. The Kingdom of Heaven may be taken by violence, and an entrance
effected in an instant, but the process of attaining the position whence the
attack may be delivered, is one extending over years. No student of occultism
needs to be told this. [Ed.]
50. 74. David means beloved; he was the first King of Israel, chosen of the
Spirit. Israel means one who strives with God—i.e. one who strives against
ignorance in order that he may be blessed together with his posterity. It was
a name given to Jacob when he wrestled with the Angel (Genesis xxxii., 28),
and applies to all who contend on the side of the Deity.
75. In the writer’s phraseology, Judah is the equivalent of Erin in this case.
It becomes exceedingly difficult to follow his meaning, for as everything is the
equivalent of everything else, we are landed in a hopeless maze of paradox.
On the principle that there is no truth without a paradox, there must be a
great truth in this article (as there is), but its disentanglement is a matter of
much labour and thought. The line of argument is the Judah meaning “be
praised”—certain people who praised or followed the Lord (or Wisdom) were
“oppressed and laid aside their harps.” There are people unjustly oppressed in
Ireland, not by the outer troubles, but by the causes of the undoubted misery
which prevails there. Consequently, the daughters of Judah and Erin are
equivalent terms and interchangeable as symbols. The fact is that the author
uses a peculiar cryptogram, as he himself states. [Ed.]
76. See “The Mother, the woman clothed with the Sun,” Vols. I. and II.; and
also the celebrated picture of “The Woman clothed with the Sun,” by Carl
Müller.
77. i.e., The Sceptre that endureth.
78. Revelation, xii.
79. The Queen of the South or Zenith (i.e. the most supreme point of the
Heavens) who shall rise in judgment with this generation (see Matthew xii,
42), She’ba represents two Hebrew words (Shebhā and Shebhȧ). The first of
these is an obscure term, compared by Gesenius with the Ethiopic for “man”;
the second signifies an oath or covenant.
80. i.e., The Christ, the Messiah.
81. i.e., The man of “Sol” or the Sun. Hence, Christians worship on Sunday
instead of on the Sabbath or on Saturday, as the Jews worship.
82. i.e., Theosophy, or the hidden outcome of the hidden wisdom of the
ages.
83. The word χρεών is explained by Herodotus (7. 11. 7.) as that which an
oracle declares, and τὸ χρεών is given by Plutarch (Nic. 14.) as “fate,”
“necessity.” Vide Herod, 7. 215; 5. 108; and Sophocles, Phil. 437.
51. 84. See Liddell and Scott’s Greek-Engl. Lex.
85. Hence of a Guru, “a teacher,” and chela, a “disciple,” in their mutual
relations.
86. In his recent work—“The Early Days of Christianity,” Canon Farrar
remarks:—“Some have supposed a pleasant play of words founded on it, as ...
between Chréstos (‘sweet’ Ps. xxx., iv., 8) and Christos (Christ)” (I. p. 158,
foot-note). But there is nothing to suppose, since it began by a “play of
words,” indeed. The name Christus was not “distorted into Chrestus,” as the
learned author would make his readers believe (p. 19), but it was the
adjective and noun Chréstos which became distorted into Christus, and
applied to Jesus. In a foot-note on the word “Chrestian,” occurring in the First
Epistle of Peter (chap. iv., 16), in which in the revised later MSS. the word was
changed into Christian, Canon Farrar remarks again, “Perhaps we should read
the ignorant heathen distortion, Chréstian.” Most decidedly we should; for the
eloquent writer should remember his Master’s command to render unto
Cæsar that which is Cæsar’s. His dislike notwithstanding, Mr. Farrar is obliged
to admit that the name Christian was first INVENTED, by the sneering, mocking
Antiochians, as early as A.D. 44, but had not come into general use before the
persecution by Nero. “Tacitus,” he says, “uses the word Christians with
something of apology. It is well known that in the N. T. it only occurs three
times, and always involves a hostile sense (Acts xi. 26, xxvi. 28, as it does in
iv. 16).” It was not Claudius alone who looked with alarm and suspicion on the
Christians, so nicknamed in derision for their carnalizing a subjective principle
or attribute, but all the pagan nations. For Tacitus, speaking of those whom
the masses called “Christians,” describes them as a set of men detested for
their enormities and crimes. No wonder, for history repeats itself. There are,
no doubt, thousands of noble, sincere, and virtuous Christian-born men and
women now. But we have only to look at the viciousness of Christian
“heathen” converts; at the morality of those proselytes in India, whom the
missionaries themselves decline to take into their service, to draw a parallel
between the converts of 1,800 years ago, and the modern heathens “touched
by grace.”
87. Justin Martyr, Tertullian, Lactantius, Clemens Alexandrinus, and others
spelt it in this way.
88. Vide Liddell and Scott’s Greek and English Lexicon. Chréstos is really
one who is continually warned, advised, guided, whether by oracle or
prophet. Mr. G. Massey is not correct in saying that “... The Gnostic form of
the name Chrest, or Chrestos, denotes the Good God, not a human original,”
for it denoted the latter, i.e., a good, holy man; but he is quite right when he
52. adds that “Chrestianus signifies ... ‘Sweetness and Light.’” “The Chrestoi, as
the Good People, were pre-extant. Numerous Greek inscriptions show that the
departed, the hero, the saintly one—that is, the ‘Good’—was styled Chrestos,
or the Christ; and from this meaning of the ‘Good’ does Justin, the primal
apologist, derive the Christian name. This identifies it with the Gnostic source,
and with the ‘Good God’ who revealed himself according to Marcion—that is,
the Un-Nefer or Good-opener of the Egyptian theology.”—(Agnostic Annual.)
89. Again I must bring forward what Mr. G. Massey says (whom I quote
repeatedly because he has studied this subject so thoroughly and so
conscientiously).
“My contention, or rather explanation,” he says, “is that the author of the
Christian name is the Mummy-Christ of Egypt, called the Karest, which was a
type of the immortal spirit in man, the Christ within (as Paul has it), the divine
offspring incarnated, the Logos, the Word of Truth, the Makheru of Egypt. It
did not originate as a mere type! The preserved mummy was the dead body
of any one that was Karest, or mummified, to be kept by the living; and,
through constant repetition, this became a type of the resurrection from (not
of!) the dead.” See the explanation of this further on.
90. Or Lydda. Reference is made here to the Rabbinical tradition in the
Babylonian Gemara, called Sepher Toledoth Jeshu, about Jesus being the son
of one named Pandira, and having lived a century earlier than the era called
Christian, namely, during the reign of the Jewish king Alexander Jannæus and
his wife Salome, who reigned from the year 106 to 79 B.C. Accused by the
Jews of having learned the magic art in Egypt, and of having stolen from the
Holy of Holies the Incommunicable Name, Jehoshua (Jesus) was put to death
by the Sanhedrin at Lud. He was stoned and then crucified on a tree, on the
eve of Passover. The narrative is ascribed to the Talmudistic authors of “Sota”
and “Sanhedrin,” p. 19, Book of Zechiel. See “Isis Unveiled,” II. 201; Arnobius;
Elephas Levi’s “Science des Esprits,” and “The Historical Jesus and Mythical
Christ,” a lecture by G. Massey.
91. “Christianus quantum interpretatione de unctione deducitas. Sed ut cum
perferam Chrestianus pronunciatus a vobis (nam nec nominis certa est notitia
penes vos) de suavitate vel benignitate compositum est.” Canon Farrar makes
a great effort to show such lapsus calami by various Fathers as the results of
disgust and fear. “There can be little doubt,” he says (in The Early Days of
Christianity) “that the ... name Christian ... was a nick-name due to the wit of
the Antiochians.... It is clear that the sacred writers avoided the name
(Christians) because it was employed by their enemies (Tac. Ann. xv. 44). It
only became familiar when the virtues of Christians had shed lustre upon it....”
This is a very lame excuse, and a poor explanation to give for so eminent a
53. thinker as Canon Farrar. As to the “virtues of Christians” ever shedding lustre
upon the name, let us hope that the writer had in his mind’s eye neither
Bishop Cyril, of Alexandria, nor Eusebius, nor the Emperor Constantine, of
murderous fame, nor yet the Popes Borgia and the Holy Inquisition.
92. Quoted by G. Higgins. (See Vol. I., pp. 569-573.)
93. In the days of Homer, we find this city, once celebrated for its
mysteries, the chief seat of Initiation, and the name of Chrestos used as a
title during the mysteries. It is mentioned in the Iliad, ii., 520 as “Chrisa”
(χρῖσα). Dr. Clarke suspected its ruins under the present site of Krestona, a
small town, or village rather, in Phocis, near the Crissæan Bay. (See E. D.
Clarke, 4th ed. Vol. viii. p. 239, “Delphi.”)
94. The root of χρητός (Chretos) and χρηστος (Chrestos) is one and the
same; χράω which means “consulting the oracle,” in one sense, but in another
one “consecrated,” set apart, belonging to some temple, or oracle, or devoted
to oracular services. On the other hand, the word χρε (χρεω) means
“obligation,” a “bond, duty,” or one who is under the obligation of pledges, or
vows taken.
95. The adjective χρηστὸς was also used as an adjective before proper
names as a compliment, as in Plat. Theact. p. 166A, “Ὁυτος ὁ Σωκράτης ὁ
χρηστός;” (here Socrates is the Chréstos), and also as a surname, as shown
by Plutarch (V. Phocion), who wonders how such a rough and dull fellow as
Phocion could be surnamed Chréstos.
96. There are strange features, quite suggestive, for an Occultist, in the
myth (if one) of Janus. Some make of him the personification of Kosmos,
others, of Cælus (heaven), hence he is “two-faced” because of his two
characters of spirit and matter; and he is not only “Janus Bifrons” (two-
faced), but also Quadrifrons—the perfect square, the emblem of the
Kabbalistic Deity. His temples were built with four equal sides, with a door and
three windows on each side. Mythologists explain it as an emblem of the four
seasons of the year, and three months in each season, and in all of the twelve
months of the year. During the mysteries of Initiation, however, he became
the Day-Sun and the Night-Sun. Hence he is often represented with the
number 300 in one hand, and in the other 65, or the number of days of the
Solar year. Now Chanoch (Kanoch and Enosh in the Bible) is, as may be
shown on Kabalistic authority, whether son of Cain, son of Seth, or the son of
Methuselah, one and the same personage. As Chanoch (according to Fuerst),
he is the Initiator, Instructor—of the astronomical circle and solar year,” as
son of Methuselah, who is said to have lived 365 years and been taken to
heaven alive, as the representative of the Sun (or god). (See Book of Enoch.)
54. Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and
personal growth!
ebookfinal.com