1. Evaluation and management of
open fractures
Dr. Bipul Borthakur
Professor And Head
Department of orthopaedics
Assam Medical College
Dibrugarh, Assam
2. Definition
• An open fracture is a fracture in which there is a break in the
skin and underlying soft tissues which leads to direct
communication of the fracture and its hematoma with the
outside environment
• When the wound occurs in the same limb segment as that of
the fracture , then it must be considered as an open fracture
until proven otherwise
3. Classification for open fractures
1. Gustilo and Anderson classification
2. AO classification
3. Ganga Hospital open injury score
5. • Gustilo and Anderson classification used for most open
fractures
• The wound classification should be done in the OT
• Advantages of classifying the wound in the OT
1. The complete extent of soft tissues injury and viability can be noted
2. Size of the skin injury can be adequately assessed
3. Periosteal stripping can be noticed
6. • Limitations of Gustilo and Anderson Classification
1. Inter observer variation
2. Lack of uniformity
3. Doesn’t address the question of salvaging the limb
4. Includes wide spectrum of injuries in Type IIIB
5. Depends on size of the skin wounds
7. AO classification
• Grade 1 - skin breakage from inside out
• Grade 2 – skin breakage from outside in , < 5 cm size with
contused edges
8. • Grade 3 – skin breakage from outside in , > 5 cm , skin
contusion with devitalised edges
• Grade 4 – full thickness contusion , abrasion , skin loss
10. Ganga Hospital open injury severity score
(GHOISS)
More commonly used for open tibia fractures
11. Aim of the initial treatment
1. Convert an open fracture to a closed fracture as soon as
possible
2. Create an environment suitable for fracture union
3. Not hinder secondary procedures
4. Avoid complications
5. Regain function
6. Get good cosmetic outcome as far as possible
12. Concept of Early Total Care
• Mostly reserved for patients who are hemodynamically
stable
• The idea is to definitively fix the bone as soon as possible
• The concept of ETC has taken a back foot now due to
complications .
• Newer concept of a staged treatment of patients is followed
now which is called Damage Control Orthopaedics
13. Damage control orthopaedics
• Basic strategies of DCO
1. Immediate and rapid stabilization of long bone fractures
2. Control hemorrhage
3. Release of tight soft tissue compartments
4. Reduction of dislocations
5. Surgical debridement of open wounds
6. Amputation in case of unsalvageable injuries
14. • Damage control orthopaedics employs staged treatment
1. Stage 1 – early temporary external fixation and stabilization
2. Stage 2 – resuscitation of the patient in the ICU
3. Stage 3 – delayed definitive management of the fracture
• DCO is mainly reserved for patients with severe injuries
who cannot tolerate long operations, blood loss , and
medullary canal manipulation without deterioration of
pulmonary function and hemostasis
15. Assessment of the patient
• On arrival , patient are assessed and ressucitated according
to ATLS protocols
• The injured limb is assessed for neurovascular injuries and
compartment syndromes
• Photographic documentation of wounds undertaken
whenever possible
16. • If immediate operative intervention planned then vigorous
debridement is discouraged
• On surgical delay of > 24 hours , irrigation with normal saline
done
• Gross contamination should be removed
• Wound is covered with saline soaked dressings
17. • Splintage
• Any skeletal trauma to be splinted with the best option
available at that moment .
• After temporary splintage , stabilization with external fixator
or definitive internal fixation is done
18. • Prevention of infection
• All open fracture wound should be considered as
contaminated
• Infection is enhanced by –
1. Bacterial contamination
2. Colonization of the wound
3. Presence of dead space with devitalised tissues
4. Foreign materials within the wound
• Practice of routine cultures from wound from pre or post
debridement is no longer advocated
19. • Antibiotic coverage for open fractures
1. Type I and II – first generation cephalosporin
2. Type III – first generation cephalosporin + aminoglycoside
3. Farm yard injuries – penicillins + aminoglycosides
• Antibiotics should be started as soon as possible
• Recent Studies shown no clear consensus about the type of
antibiotics to be used .
• Emphasis given on early start of systemic antibiotics with Gram
+ and Gram - coverage
20. • Guidelines for tetanus prophylaxis
• Tetanus prophylaxis to be given in the emergency
• Current dose of toxoid is 0.5 ml regardless of the age
• Toxoid and immunoglobulins given intramuscularly with two
different syringes in two different locations
• Dose of immunoglobulins
< 5 years of age – 75 IU
5 – 10 years of age – 125 IU
> 10 years of age – 250 IU
21. • The guidelines for prophylaxis depend on 3 factors
complete or incomplete vaccination history ( 3 doses )
Date of most recent vaccination
Severity of the wound
22. Wound management
• Assessment of the wound
1. What is the nature of the wound ?
2. What is the state of the skin around the wound ?
3. Is the circulation satisfactory ?
4. Are the nerves intact ?
23. • Irrigation and debridement
Adequate irrigation and debridement most important steps in open
fracture management
The most commonly used irrigant is normal saline
High pressure irrigation removes more bacteria and necrotic tissues but
might reduce bone healing
24. The current consensus leans more towards high
volume , low pressure lavage repeated adequate
number of times in pulsatile manner for better
healing and prevention of infection
25. • Technique of debridement
Wash and drape the wound as for normal surgical
procedures
Remove devitalized and contaminated tissues until
fresh bleeding occurs
Remove devitalized fats beneath the flaps
Look for 4 C’s – contraction of the muscle, consistency
of the muscle, capillary flow, colour of the muscle
26. Open the fascia to allow exposure of the muscles ,
tendons
Remove all devitalised muscles and tendons
Enlarge the wound for proper debridement and
exposure of the fracture
27. Retained avascular bone and small devitalised
fragments which are to be removed
Irrigate the wound with Normal Saline after removal of
dead tissues
Close the surgically created wound first
Loosely close the other wound with a corrugated
rubber drain insitu if needed
28. • Volume of fluid required for irrigation
For type I open fractures – 3 litres
For type II open fractures – 6 litres
For type III open fractures – 9 litres
29. • Serial debridement if needed , planned after 24 to
48 hours from first debridement
• Debridement is an urgent procedure
• Adequacy of the debridement is more important
•
• Timing of debridement depends on heamodynamic
stability of the patient
30. • Fracture stabilization
For type I fractures , any technique that is suitable for closed
fracture management is satisfactory
Upto type IIIA closed internal fixation can be done
The method of reduction and stabilization of the fracture
depends on
1. Bone that is involved
2. Type of fracture
3. The efficacy of the debridement
4. Patient’s general condition
5. Surgeons choice
32. • External fixators are mainly used as temporary stabilizers
• Used as definitive treatment when stable fracture
configuration with good reduction is achieved
• Pin tract infection is the most common complication with
external fixators
• External fixators are preferred for metaphyseal and
diaphyseal fractures
33. • Advantages of external fixators
1. Reasonable stability is obtained
2. Reasonable anatomical reduction is possible in most cases
3. Minimal additional soft tissue trauma
4. Chances of infection are minimised
5. Can easily be converted to internal fixation at the
appropriate time
6. Proper wound care is possible
34. Plate fixation
• Indications
1. Most open upper limb fractures
2. Femoral fractures involving periarticular and articular
regions
3. All intra articular and juxta articular fractures
• Disadvantage
• Needs increased soft tissue exposure and stripping of the
periosteum
35. Intra medullary nailing
• Often first choice for lower limb diaphyseal fractures
• Suited for type I and type II injuries and some type III injuries
with minimal contamination
• Role of unreamed nails
Advantages
1. Cause less devascularization
2. Shorter operating time
3. Lower incidence of fat embolism and thermal necrosis
Disadvantages
1. Increased rate of implant failure
2. Fracture disruption during surgery
3. Higher rate of non union and malunion
36. Wound closure
• Primary wound closure is controversial but in some cases it
has shown good results
• Indications
1. Type I , II and III A injuries of the limb
2. Wounds without primary skin loss or secondary skin loss after
debridement
3. Injury to debridement interval less than 12 hrs
4. Presence of bleeding wound margins which can be apposed without
tension
5. Stable fixation achieved with internal or external fixation
37. • Contraindications of primary closure
1. Delayed presentation >12 hours
2. Delayed administration of antibiotics >12 hours
3. Deep seated contamination
4. Immunocompromised patients
5. Nerve injuries
6. Inability to achieve tension free closure
7. High risk of anerobic contamination
38. • Concept of reconstruction ladder
• The traditional reconstruction ladder concept proposed the
reconstruction of tissues in a step wise pattern with
increasing complexity as we go up the ladder
39. • The older concept of reconstruction ladder was shown to
have drawbacks so a new concept has been developed in the
recent years which is called Reconstruction Elevator
40. • Skin grafting principles
1. Harvest skin from doner site to cover the defect
2. Split thickness skin graft – when the graft includes only
portion of the dermis
3. Full thickness skin graft - when a graft contains entire
dermis
• Split thickness skin grafts can survive in conditions with less
vascularity but can develop contracture
41. • Flap coverage
• Unlike grafts , flaps maintain its own blood supply
• Used for large wounds or to cover underlying bone and
tendons that may not be managed by graft alone
42. • Negative pressure wound therapy
• It is beneficial in the treatment of all injuries where soft
tissue coverage is not immediately possible and can be done
with Vacuum Assisted wound closure ( VAC )
43. • Advantages of VAC therapy
1. Promotes wound contracture and increases the chances of
delayed primary closure
2. Removes excess edematous fluid
3. Causes reactive increase in blood flow and promotes
wound healing
4. Decreases bacterial burden
5. Removes protein and electrolytes that are harmful for
healing
44. Limb salvage and Amputation
• Limb is not viable as evidenced by
1. Irrepairable vascular injury
2. Warm ischemia time > 8 hours
3. Severe crush injury with minimal viable soft tissues remaining
4. Severely damaged limb may constitute a threat to patient’s life
5. The severity of the injury would demand multiple operative procedures
and prolonged reconstruction time
6. ISS score > 20
45. • A Mangled extremity score ( MESS ) of > 7 accurately
predicts the need for amputation
• MESS
Developed to identify patients who will be benifited by primary
amputation
The outcome of the limb is either salvage or amputation
A score of >/= to 7 is predictive of amputation
47. Summary
• Assessment and classification of open fractures should be
done intra operatively based on the degree of bacterial
contamination , soft tissue damage and fracture
charcteristics
• To avoid complications the wound should be thoroughly
irrigated and debrided
• Tetanus toxoid and immunoglobulins should be given in
emergency department
• Early systemic , wide spectrum antibiotic therapy is to be
used to cover both gram positive and gram negative
organisms
48. • In the presence of extensive soft tissue loss and exposed
bone , coverage is accomplished with early transfer of free
or local muscle flaps
• Stable fracture fixation is important , the method chosen
depends on the bone and soft tissue characteristics
• Early bone grafting is indicated for bone defects , unstable
fractures treated with external fixation , and delayed union