Greater than the sum of its parts? Lessons from a collaborative, multi-actor, scenario-based approach for securing local tenure rights

Editor's Notes

• #6: Many indigenous people are expect to have have full rights Policy on reform implementation is from central In many cases, this is due to overlapping and conflicting mandates
• #14: Again, the slide is too busy. YWhat do you want the viewer to get out of this? you need to point it out since the slide has a lot on it. it seems to me that the top three drivers mentioned by women only and mixed groups are more or less the same in each district. so both men and women view [NAME THEM] as important factors influencing tenure security. in terms of differences, you need to state what is specific to women only and what is specific to men only. perhaps you can indicate that across all the three districts there was nothing that cut across that could be attributed only to women or though it does seem as though market access and NGO presence seems to be key for women at least in 2 of the districts. Might want to say why.
• #16: access, management, ownership, withdrawal, exclusion, alienation are these similiarites across countries in what the desired scenarios envision? i dont understand this slide. are these similarities? in what? Again too much text which is very hard to follow for someone reading/listening Collaboration: Peru: the communication and coordination (within and) between the government agencies and communities Indonesia: In Indonesia (especially Lampung) the collaboration is widened to consider all stakeholders in relation to forest management Uganda: involving all the stakeholders in policy and law formulation and coordination working mechanism Who take Lead: NGO in Uganda Customary people in Indonesia In Peru, the content of the rights are not specifically defined but there is land tenure security and communities are able to use the resources in a sustainable way and make economic gains, e.g. in Madre de Dios the fact that communities have been able to complete their recognition/titling processes. They are also able to claim their rights and they are being heard. In Indonesia, the traditional communities are recognized and respected. In Lampung region, the community support is not limited to granted rights but it also includes incentives to business activities. In Uganda, there seem to be full forest tenure security and clearly defined rights for women. In Lamwo, the cultural institutions are the ones giving the full rights. In Peru, Madre de Dios, budget is not specifically mentioned but the government is said to have capacity according to it functions so it probably means there is enough budget, knowledge, capacity etc. In Loreto, the institutions have enough budget, skills, knowledge etc. In Indonesia, there is adequate budget for the communities and capacity building/empowerment. In Uganda, there is adequate or even increased (Masindi) budget and skilled and enough workers in forestry sector.
• #17: the action plans are different from each country and there are many context and region specific actions. action plans are expected to be integrated into national or regional development program. Policy and governance: occurs in all regions: Addressing political will and interference, mismatch between national policy and local realities, roles of government agencies. Knowledge, skills & capacity:mentioned in 5/7 regions operational and technical capacity of communities management capacity of local authorities, human resources The community Participation/Empowerment (women) is also common in 6/7 regions (MdD). Community need to take in to account in decision-making. In negative scenarios, communities have little or no attention, which leads to conflicts.