How does feasibility differ in an agile environment in comparison to.pdf
- 1. How does feasibility differ in an agile environment in comparison to a traditional environment? What is meant by the idea that "soft is harder than hard" in regards to commercial vs. in-house or outsourced software development? Solution Traditional development Agile development High quality adaptive software is Systems are fully specifiable, developed by small teams that Fundamental predictable and are developed use the principle of continuous hypothesis through extended and detailed improvement of design and planning testing based on fast feed-back and change Management style Command and control Leadership and collaboration Knowledge Explicit Tacit management Communication Formal Informal Life cycle model Development model (waterfall, spiral or modified Evolutionary-delivery model models)
- 2. Mechanic (bureaucratic, high Organic (flexible and Organizational participative, encourages social formalization), targeting large structure cooperation), targeting small and organization medium organizations Difficult planning and strict Permanent control or Quality control requirements, design and control. Difficult and late testing solutions. Permanent testing User requirements Detailed and defined before Interactive input coding/implementation Cost of restart High Low Development Fixed Easily changeable direction Testing After coding is completed Every iteration Client involvement Low High Additional abilities Interpersonal abilities and basic required from Nothing in particular
- 3. knowledge of the business developers Appropriate scale of Large scale Low and medium scale the project Oriented on plan, with adequate Agile, with advanced Developers abilities, access to external knowledge, co-located and knowledge cooperative With access to knowledge, Dedicated, knowledgeable, Clients cooperative, representative and cooperative, representative and empowered empowered Requirements Very stable, known in advance Emergent, with rapid changes Architecture Design for current and Design for current requirements predictable requirements Remodeling Expensive Not expensive Size Large teams and projects Small teams and projects Primary objectives High safety Quick value
- 4. Both of these software devlopment methodology have its own merits and demerits if we consider any one is simple approch than when we completely go through any of the methodology and later we find it some how harder than other approch. In-house software is basicallydeveloped by a team which is considered by you, it provides you knowledgeable support. Rather than dealing with any type of technicians who may not understand your customized software or unique situation, The support is provided by team who devloped your softwares. Also sometimes it also cheaper suppose that you have a staff of 4 software devlpoers then if there are any complex project comes then they doesnt demand you extra money as there salaries are fixed.But also it sometimes lack scalability, and upgrades can be troublesome. where as in outsourcing projects it Decreases coding/development burden on the IT staff. which some times may also cost you more money. Traditional development Agile development High quality adaptive software is Systems are fully specifiable, developed by small teams that Fundamental predictable and are developed use the principle of continuous hypothesis through extended and detailed improvement of design and planning testing based on fast feed-back and change Management style Command and control Leadership and collaboration Knowledge Explicit Tacit management