SlideShare a Scribd company logo

How Meark as an enterprise leverages DSDM?

A
AgileNetwork

Meark Enterprise Private Limited, founded in February 2016 and ISO certified, focuses on providing consulting and IT services across various sectors including agriculture, education, and healthcare. The document details the application of the Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM) for iterative and incremental project development, emphasizing improved communication and prioritization through structured techniques. It outlines challenges, phase details, project roles, and performance measures to enhance effective delivery and quality within the enterprise framework.

Technology
1 of 42
Download to read offline
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
Presented by Meark Enterprise Private Limited  Consulting, IT Products and Services organization established in Feb 2016.  ISO 9001 (Quality) and ISO 27001 (Information Security) certified organization Meark’s Vision To provide significant value to our clients by architecting optimized processes and systems for efficient business functioning. Sectors  Agriculture  Education and Skilling  Public sector  Retail  Banking  Insurance  Healthcare  Manufacturing Our Focus Solutions devoted to users not technologies.
Nithya Subramaniam Managing Director Meark Enterprise Private Limited How Meark as an Enterprise Leverages DSDM? Nithya has more than 16 years of experience and is a recognized expert in the software business analysis and architecture field . She currently leads the Exploration and Engineering teams of Meark to deliver Consulting, IT Services and Products enabling clients to do business better by technology and process changes. Her earlier roles include Consultant and Senior Manager for Innovations, Campus Management Corp. Product Manager, NEC India Practice manager for Higher Education Sector , Wipro Multiple business analysis engagements in the retail sector, Wipro
How Meark as an Enterprise Leverages DSDM? © Meark Enterprise Private Limited Document Classification: Restricted Sharing Organizers and Participants
Presented by Agenda Why DSDM? Better Visibility Freedom to Choose Structured Reviews, No Surprises! Performance Concise Communication Going Forward © Meark Enterprise Private Limited Document Classification: Restricted Sharing Organizers and Participants
Why DSDM?
Presented by Our Challenges One Hero Analysis Paralysis Priority Anchor The right delivery guy Over-engineering Director The Expert of Options Safe Commitmen t Owner
Presented by Why DSDM Framework? Start-up Model to follow One ofAgile And a proven model Gain Compliance For ISO and CMMI Standards Easy to Communicate Less documentation Focus on Output DSDM (1994) Iterative and Incremental  To provide more discipline to the rapid application development . IT and Non-IT Projects Agile Manifesto (2001) Individuals and interactions  over processes and tools Working software  over comprehensive documentation Customer collaboration  over contract negotiation Responding to change  over following a plan
Presented by What is Dynamic Systems Development Method(DSDM) Focus on the business need Deliver on time Collaborate Never compromise quality Build incrementally from firm foundations Develop iteratively Communicate continuously and clearly Demonstrate control Principles Prioritisation Technique – MoSCoW Must Have 60% Should Have 20% Could Have 20 % Won’t Have Timebox Plan Iterative 4 Week Sprints Terms of Reference Benefit Assessment 8 6 Phases
Evolutionary Development : Exploration+ Engineering Sprints Team Structure
Presented by DSDM Timebox A DSDM structured timebox A free format timebox
Better Visibility
Presented by Exploration to Engineering Execution Prioritised Requirements List - Storyboard
Presented by Traceability to User Guide
Presented by Better Visibility Missed components and priorities due to definition misses. [ One board] Missed components and priorities due to definition misses. [ One board] Better visibility for planning. [Two boards – Exploration and Engineering] Better visibility for planning. [Two boards – Exploration and Engineering] PC Project Co-ordinator Before Before After After
Freedom to Choose within the boundary
Presented by Engineering then Exploration Sprints
Presented by DSDM - Prioritisation Technique Prioritisation Technique – MoSCoW Must Have - 60% Should have - 20% Could have - 20 % Won’t have
Presented by Freedom to Choose within the boundary Project Co-ordinator 1. Team’s identify component’s to built 1. Team’s identify component’s to built 1. Mark identified sprint components they choose to do for the day 1. Mark identified sprint components they choose to do for the day Before Before After After
Structured Reviews, No Surprises!
Meark – Exploration Sprint Sprint Exploration Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week 1 UI Story(PRL) and Wireframes SAT Meeting PA, Email TA _ _ _ UI Draft UI SAT, TL _ _ _ UI Refinement UI, SAT Meeting PA, Email TA DB Design TL/TA TL/TA UI Optimization UI, SAT Meeting PA, TA DB Review TL/TA PA Week 4 MoSCoW, Timeboxplan* PC, PA EmailTA, Developer,TL SRS Document SAT PA Engineering Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week1 Code with UI DEV, TL Prepare Test cases and Test Data SAT PA Code with SRS Document DEV, TL _ _ _ Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ _ _ Bug Fixing DEV, TL SAT Daily Buglist SAT DEV,TL Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ Test Report Draft User Guide SAT _ Retrospective Meeting, Next Sprint planning PC,ALL _ Timeboxreview record*/Project ReviewReport* SAT,PC _ Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Assemble Review Deploy to UAT TL,TA TA User Guide SAT PA Deploy to Prod/Demo TL,TA TA End User Training SAT, PA _ Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Business Case, Priortized Requirements List PA _ Solution Architecture Definition PA,TA PC DeliveryPlan, Management Approach Definition PC TA,PA Development Approach Definition TA PC Legend Reference for further reading: https://www.agilebusiness.org/ Feasibility Phase Foundations Phase Project Closure Meark - Dynamic Systems Development Method(DSDM) - SDLC Version 5.0 * represents Milestone Products SAT- Solution Analyst and Tester UI-UI Developer TL- Team Lead DEV-Developer PC- Project Co-ordinator PA- Process Architect TA- TechnicalArchitect Pre-Project Phase Terms of Reference* Feasibility Assessment (PC)* Foundation Summary(PC)* Deployment Phase Week4 Week2,3 Code Review per component by TL/Dev Weekly Code Optimization by TA Post - Project Phase Benefits Assessment DSDM Evolutionary Products (Optional) Week4 Week 2,3 Evolutionary Development Phase - Exploration + Engineering Draft Refinement Optimization Exploration States Sprint Exploration Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week 1 UI Story (PRL) and Wireframes SAT Meeting PA, Email TA _ _ _ UI Draft UI SAT, TL _ _ _ UI Refinement UI, SAT Meeting PA, Email TA DB Design TL/TA TL/TA UI Optimization UI, SAT Meeting PA, TA DB Review TL/TA PA Week 4 MoSCoWComponent List , Timeboxplan* PC, PA, TA TL, SAT Validations, Notiifcations, SRS Document SAT PA Week 2,3 Evolutionary Development Phase - Exploration + Engineering
Presented by Sample Tracking
Presented by 100+Components – Validation List is at One place
Presented by Structured Reviews, Yet in any Order! 1. UI multiple-changes as Issue 2. Developers work on changing UI 1. UI multiple-changes as Issue 2. Developers work on changing UI 1. UI in Exploration Sprint 2. 3 level UI reviews yield best possible design 3. Validations upfront 1. UI in Exploration Sprint 2. 3 level UI reviews yield best possible design 3. Validations upfront Before Before After After PA SAT UI
Meark – Engineering Sprint Sprint Exploration Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week 1 UI Story(PRL) and Wireframes SAT Meeting PA, Email TA _ _ _ UI Draft UI SAT, TL _ _ _ UI Refinement UI, SAT Meeting PA, Email TA DB Design TL/TA TL/TA UI Optimization UI, SAT Meeting PA, TA DB Review TL/TA PA Week 4 MoSCoW, Timeboxplan* PC, PA EmailTA, Developer,TL SRS Document SAT PA Engineering Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week1 Code with UI DEV, TL Prepare Test cases and Test Data SAT PA Code with SRS Document DEV, TL _ _ _ Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ _ _ Bug Fixing DEV, TL SAT Daily Buglist SAT DEV,TL Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ Test Report Draft User Guide SAT _ Retrospective Meeting, Next Sprint planning PC,ALL _ Timeboxreview record*/Project ReviewReport* SAT,PC _ Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Assemble Review Deploy to UAT TL,TA TA User Guide SAT PA Deploy to Prod/Demo TL,TA TA End User Training SAT, PA _ Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Business Case, Priortized Requirements List PA _ Solution Architecture Definition PA,TA PC DeliveryPlan, Management Approach Definition PC TA,PA Development Approach Definition TA PC Legend Reference for further reading: https://www.agilebusiness.org/ Feasibility Phase Foundations Phase Project Closure Meark - Dynamic Systems Development Method(DSDM) - SDLC Version 5.0 * represents Milestone Products SAT- Solution Analyst and Tester UI-UI Developer TL- Team Lead DEV-Developer PC- Project Co-ordinator PA- Process Architect TA- TechnicalArchitect Pre-Project Phase Terms of Reference* Feasibility Assessment (PC)* Foundation Summary(PC)* Deployment Phase Week4 Week2,3 Code Review per component by TL/Dev Weekly Code Optimization by TA Post - Project Phase Benefits Assessment DSDM Evolutionary Products (Optional) Week4 Week 2,3 Evolutionary Development Phase - Exploration + Engineering Code Review Release Engineering Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week 1 Code with UI DEV, TL Prepare Test cases and Test Data SAT PA Code with SRS Document DEV, TL _ _ _ Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ _ _ Bug Fixing DEV, TL SAT Daily Bug list SAT DEV,TL Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ Test Report Draft User Guide SAT _ Retrospective Meeting, Next Sprint planning PC,ALL _ Timeboxreview record*/Project ReviewReport* SAT,PC _ Week 4 Week 2,3 Code Reviewper component by TL/Dev Weekly Code Optimization by TA Engineering States
Presented by Structured Reviews, Yet in any Order! 1. Daily Dependency on Architect in Development 1. Daily Dependency on Architect in Development Only reviews and logic complexity requires intervention of technical architect. Only reviews and logic complexity requires intervention of technical architect. Before Before After After TA TL, DEV
Presented by Meark -Sample Monthly Sprint Planner and Tracker Sprint Items Responsible Duratio n in Hrs Planned Work Dates Responsible Person Completion Status Overall Status Tester Confirmatio n Technical Review and Dependency Functional Review and Dependency Organization Registration Public Page - Resolving Duplicate Registration Issue CR - SCR -USR- ORS-014 Dev A 4 7 Completed Completed Completed NA Completed Manage GST and Fee – SCR -USR- ORS-012 Dev A 6 7 Completed Open Completed Completed Completed Manage Subscription – SCR-VMS–SUB -002 Dev B 24 Open Open Completed Completed Completed View Subscription Packs – Public page - SCR-VMS–SUB -002 Dev A 24 15,22,29 Completed Open Completed Completed Completed Payment Registration and Integration for Sports 2. with Receipt Generation Dev C 8 8,15,22,1 Open Open Pending Completed Completed Website update – Inclusion of New content page SCR-WES–POR -034 Dev C 4 22 Completed Completed NA NA Completed Available duration for Sprint in hours starting 1st Dec 160
Performance
Presented by DSDM Principals
Presented by Meark – Performance - Sample View of a Month SN Key Performance Areas (KPA) Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Max Score Associate Score Associate Score Associate Score Associate Score Associate Score Sprint PerformanceProject Team Performance as determined by Quality of Sprint Deliverables or Opportunities created/capitalized. 50 30 49.5 30 42 49.5 1Deliver on Time 1a. Focus on business priorities. Guarantee Minimum Usable Subset. 1b.Always hit deadlines. Ability to stretch when work is incomplete/ required for business by self or as requested. 2a. For Dev and SAT: Occurrences of missing requirements as identified in testing/review. Pro-active scheduling of Review/UAT with Manger/customer and ensuring sign-off. Zero delays. 10 6 10 5 9 10 2Never Compromise Quality 1. Adherence to provided formats for Email Signature, Release emails. For Developer: Code Conventions, Quality of code as identified in review by TL/TA. For SAT : Quality of requirement and test document with coverage of scenarios, as reviewed by PA/PM/Client. 2. For Developer: Defects/unresolved issue re-opened by tester and manager. For SAT: Defect identified by manger/customer post system release. 10 8 10 8 8 9.5 3Embrace Change, Experiment and Learn 1a. Instances of Exploration and Implementation of new UI pattern/Technology component/ New Applications/ Application Improvements. 1b. Accept change positively and handle changing workloads in response to changing circumstances. 2a. Learning sessions participated at least 6 hrs. 2b. Learning conducted/showcased at least 1, min of 30 mins. Willingness to learn new skills, attend self-improvement training. 10 5 9.5 6 8 10 4Collaborate, Communicate Continuously and Clearly 1a. Participation is delayed/absent in meetings/ Sprint sessions. 1b. Pro-active scheduling of required reviews/meetings. Pro-active transparent communication of a) change in time, in case of delay, b) change in task from what is planned on daily/given task. Number of times follow-up email where received. 2a. Daily update in Kanban and email without follow-up. Appropriate Response for query post in email within 30 mins during work hours. Clear and independent communication without grammatical errors. When Associate/Manager is not available for immediate clarification for doubt, has mail been sent out immediately. For SAT includes: Presence in project kick-off call with TA. 2b. Early communication of leave request, permission requirement. Maximum of 2 permission per month. 10 7 10 7 8 10 5Initiatives Initiatives as recognized by the Manager 10 8 10 8 9 10 Total 100 64 99 64 84 99
Presented by Team Performance Ratings – In Sprint too! 1. 6 months feedback meetings on 10 competencies 2. Yearly appraisals 1. 6 months feedback meetings on 10 competencies 2. Yearly appraisals 1. Monthly Feedback Emails and Awards 2. Rated based on 5 points by PA/TA 3. Yearly appraisals 1. Monthly Feedback Emails and Awards 2. Rated based on 5 points by PA/TA 3. Yearly appraisals Before Before After After Team
Concise Communication
Presented by DSDM – Detailed in 2 Pages Our workplan and output for each week of the month sprint and increment RACI Matrix For each output Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed
Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Wireframes SAT Meeting PA, Email TA _ _ _ UI Draft UI SAT, TL _ _ _ UI Refinement UI, SAT Meeting PA, Email TA DB Design TL/TA TL/TA UI Optimization UI, SAT Meeting PA,Email TA DB Review TL/TA PA MoSCoW, Timeboxplan* SAT,PA EmailTA, Developer,TL _ _ _ Sprint In Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week 1 Code with UI DEV, TL SRS Document SAT PA Code with SRS Document DEV, TL Prepare Test cases and Test Data SAT PA Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ _ _ Bug Fixing DEV, TL SAT Daily Bug list SAT DEV,TL Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ Test Report Draft User Guide SAT _ Retrospective Meeting, Next Sprint planning PC,ALL _ Timeboxreview record*/Project ReviewReport* SAT,PC _ Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Assemble Review Deploy to UAT TL,TA TA User Guide SAT PA Deploy to Prod/Demo TL,TA TA End User Training SAT, PA _ Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Business Case, Priortized Requirements List PA _ Solution Architecture Definition PA,TA PC Delivery Plan, Management Approach Definition PC TA,PA Development Approach Definition TA PC Evolutionary Development Phase User Interface Post - Project Phase Benefits Assessment* DSDM Evolutionary Products (Optional) Week 4 Feasibility Phase Foundations Phase Project Closure Meark - Dynamic Systems Development Method(DSDM) - SDLC Version 4.0 Pre-Project Phase Terms of Reference* Feasibility Assessment (PC)* Foundation Summary (PC)* Deployment Phase Week 4 Week 2,3 Code Reviewper component by TL/Dev Weekly Code Database SN DSDM Phase Project Activities PC PA TA SAT UI TL/DEV 1 Pre-Project Phase Terms of Reference* I RA C I - - 2 Feasibility Phase Feasibility Assessment (PC)* RA C C C - - 3 Foundation Summary Foundation Summary (PC)* RA RA C C - - 4 Foundation Summary Provide Functional requirements I RA I C - - 5 Foundation Summary Delivery Plan RA C C C - - 6 Evolutionary Development Phase UI - Wireframes I A C R - - 7 Evolutionary Development Phase UI - Draft I I I AC R - 8 Evolutionary Development Phase UI- Refinement I C C AC R - 9 Evolutionary Development Phase UI - Optimization I C C AC R - 10 Evolutionary Development Phase DB Design I C RA C - - 11 Evolutionary Development Phase DB Review I C RA C - - 12 Evolutionary Development Phase Provide Component IDs (Screens/Reports/APIs) I C I RA - - 13 Evolutionary Development Phase SRS Document I C I RA - - 14 Evolutionary Development Phase Review SRS I RA I C - - 15 Evolutionary Development Phase Write SRS Requirements with DB Table names I I C RA - - 16 Evolutionary Development Phase Write Scripting in Json templates (if required) I I C RA - I 17 Evolutionary Development Phase Identify TL/DEV, Plan Sprint,MoSCoW,Timebox plan* RA C C C I I 18 Evolutionary Development Phase Team Specific Sprint Meetings and daily progress update RA C C C I I 19 Evolutionary Development Phase Provide KT to Developer I C I RA - I 20 Evolutionary Development Phase Dev Kickoff call I - RA C - C 21 Evolutionary Development Phase Prepare Test cases and Test Data I C I RA - - 22 Evolutionary Development Phase Code with UI I C C C C RA 23 Evolutionary Development Phase Code with SRS Document and Unit Test I C C C C RA 24 Evolutionary Development Phase Provide Functional clarification to developers I C C RA C I 25 Evolutionary Development Phase Provide Technical clarification to developers I - RA C C C 26 Evolutionary Development Phase Review development progress in Daily Sprint calls RA I I C - C 27 Evolutionary Development Phase Release Multiple Cycles - Release Email I I C I - RA 28 Evolutionary Development Phase Test Multiple Cycles -Smoke Test Accept/Reject, Daily Bug list I I I RA - C 29 Evolutionary Development Phase End of Sprint - Retrospective Meeting, Next Sprint planning RA C C C C C 30 Evolutionary Development Phase Timebox Review Record* C C RA I I I 30 Deployment Phase Project Review Report* RA C I I I I 31 Deployment Phase Assemble Review Deploy to UAT I I C I - RA 32 Deployment Phase User Guide I C I RA - C 33 Deployment Phase Conduct UAT and get Sign-off I C I RA - - 34 Deployment Phase End User Training I C I RA - - 35 Deployment Phase Deploy to Prod I I C I - RA 36 Post - Project Phase Benefits Assessment* C RA I C - - 37 Any Phase- Evolutionary Products Business Case, Priortized Requirements List I RA C C - - 38 Any Phase- Evolutionary Products Delivery Plan, Management Approach Definition RA C C C - - 39 Any Phase- Evolutionary Products Solution Architecture Definition C A R I - - 40 Any Phase- Evolutionary Products Development Approach Definition C C RA I - - Legend: * represents Milestone products Responsible  Those who do the work to complete the task Accountable  One ultimately answerable for correctness and completion Consulted  Those whose opinions are sought Informed  Those who are kept up-to-date on progress DSDM RACI Matrix Version 4.0 RACI
Going Forward
Going Forward 1. Attempt better Sprint Cycles for UI teams 2. Sprint Progress Based Morning Reports
What we do at Meark
Presented by Meark Products Visitark Stark Inspectark Inspection Management Spark Devark Sector Specific Sector Agnostic Skillar Skill and Placements for Skilling Sector Agriark Agriculture Produce Aggregator Visitor Management Guest Houses and Halls Management Alumni and Placement for Education Sector Event Management for Education Sector
Presented by Meark Services Integration with Enterprise and National systems Robotic Process Automation Reporting and Analytics Mobile Apps in Cordova / PWA Website Development   Application Design & Development 
Our Clients and End Clients/ Users of Meark Now Anthology Talisma Corporation Pvt. Ltd TNSDC CET Maharashtra Directorate of Technical Education, Chhattisgarh  Development partners Indian Center for Social Transformation, Tech Mahindra.  Interfaces with IMD, ISRO, ICAR, DACFW, NWIC, CGWB  End users Farmers, Farm Suppliers and Buyers
Ability to see vehicles on the Maps with statuses and geocoding Vehicle Tracking RFID based Bin Tracking - Pharmacy Distribution Company
How Meark as an enterprise leverages DSDM?
How Meark as an enterprise leverages DSDM?

More Related Content

PPT
Software Project Management (lecture 3)
Syed Muhammad Hammad
 
PPT
Carol daniele
NASAPMC
 
PPTX
Stefanini.trinh
NASAPMC
 
PPT
Other software processes (Software project Management)
Ankit Gupta
 
PDF
Afrekenen met functiepunten
Nesma
 
PPTX
Software Engineering by Pankaj Jalote
Golda Margret Sheeba J
 
PPT
Lect3
Sulman Ahmed
 
PPTX
13 software metrics
University of Computer Science and Technology
 
Software Project Management (lecture 3)
Syed Muhammad Hammad
 
Carol daniele
NASAPMC
 
Stefanini.trinh
NASAPMC
 
Other software processes (Software project Management)
Ankit Gupta
 
Afrekenen met functiepunten
Nesma
 
Software Engineering by Pankaj Jalote
Golda Margret Sheeba J
 
Lect3
Sulman Ahmed
 
13 software metrics
University of Computer Science and Technology
 

What's hot (20)

PPT
Pmi, Opm3 And Cmmi Assessment Overview
Alan McSweeney
 
PPT
Business Analyst Requirements Management
Mark Borowski
 
PPTX
Process for requirement identification & development in software development
Rohana K Amarakoon
 
DOCX
process models- software engineering
Arun Nair
 
PPTX
Software Engineering- Engineering Practice
Trinity Dwarka
 
PPT
Integrating agile into sdlc presentation pmi v2
pmimkecomm
 
PDF
Spm tutorials
Vinod Kumar
 
PPTX
مدخل الى هندسة البرمجيات _ Introduction to Software Engineering
Ahmed Alageed
 
PPT
Housch
NASAPMC
 
PPT
Software process life cycles
sathish sak
 
PPTX
Sda 6
AmberMughal5
 
PDF
Software engineering
faisalwajid
 
DOCX
Notes of Software engineering and Project Management
NANDINI SHARMA
 
PPTX
Process model in SE
suranisaunak
 
PPTX
Agile architecture
Paul Preiss
 
PDF
Soft engg introduction and process models
snehalkulkarni74
 
PPT
Software Project Mangmement (Lecture 5)
Syed Muhammad Hammad
 
PPT
Requirements engineering process in software engineering
Preeti Mishra
 
PPT
Bahrs.peter
NASAPMC
 
DOC
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Mahalakshmi Seenaswamy
 
Pmi, Opm3 And Cmmi Assessment Overview
Alan McSweeney
 
Business Analyst Requirements Management
Mark Borowski
 
Process for requirement identification & development in software development
Rohana K Amarakoon
 
process models- software engineering
Arun Nair
 
Software Engineering- Engineering Practice
Trinity Dwarka
 
Integrating agile into sdlc presentation pmi v2
pmimkecomm
 
Spm tutorials
Vinod Kumar
 
مدخل الى هندسة البرمجيات _ Introduction to Software Engineering
Ahmed Alageed
 
Housch
NASAPMC
 
Software process life cycles
sathish sak
 
Sda 6
AmberMughal5
 
Software engineering
faisalwajid
 
Notes of Software engineering and Project Management
NANDINI SHARMA
 
Process model in SE
suranisaunak
 
Agile architecture
Paul Preiss
 
Soft engg introduction and process models
snehalkulkarni74
 
Software Project Mangmement (Lecture 5)
Syed Muhammad Hammad
 
Requirements engineering process in software engineering
Preeti Mishra
 
Bahrs.peter
NASAPMC
 
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Mahalakshmi Seenaswamy
 
Ad

Similar to How Meark as an enterprise leverages DSDM? (20)

PDF
Technical Webinar: By the (Play) Book: The Agile Practice at OutSystems
OutSystems
 
PPT
Cisco Systems Case Study: The Architecture Review Process Improving the IT P...
Susan Bouchard
 
DOCX
KotaSriHarsha
Sriharsha Kota
 
PPTX
LeSS Like Adoption @ SAP
Robert Briese
 
PPT
1 Ads
lcbj
 
DOCX
Sreedhar_Bandaru_M
Sridhar Bandaru
 
DOCX
Resume_Lakshmi Chaitanya_Technical Specialist_Thirdware Solutions
Lakshmi Chaitanya Arikela
 
PPT
The Big Bang - Upgrading to Banner 8.1
TJ Rains
 
DOCX
bhanu prasadTeradataDev
Bhanu Prasad
 
PPTX
Read Curriculum vitae of Shwetabh Kumar as Project Manager at Deloitte
shwetabhkumar
 
DOC
Sandeep_Pawar_CV
Sandeep Pawar
 
PDF
Resume of Shwetabh Kumar, Project Manager at Deloitte
shwetabhkumar
 
DOCX
Shibumon Manaveettil CV
Shibumon Manaveettil
 
PDF
What is performance_engineering_v0.2
Trevor Warren
 
PPT
Downloads abc 2006 presentation downloads-ramesh_babu
Hem Rana
 
DOCX
Bhanu prasad profile
Bhanu Prasad
 
DOCX
Adi CV Tech Manager
Satyanarayan Adi
 
PPTX
Dev area wip
Barbara Romina Klurfan
 
PPTX
Dev area wip
Barbara Romina Klurfan
 
PDF
Sandeep Gupta_ProductSpecialist_3.8yrs
sandeep Gupta
 
Technical Webinar: By the (Play) Book: The Agile Practice at OutSystems
OutSystems
 
Cisco Systems Case Study: The Architecture Review Process Improving the IT P...
Susan Bouchard
 
KotaSriHarsha
Sriharsha Kota
 
LeSS Like Adoption @ SAP
Robert Briese
 
1 Ads
lcbj
 
Sreedhar_Bandaru_M
Sridhar Bandaru
 
Resume_Lakshmi Chaitanya_Technical Specialist_Thirdware Solutions
Lakshmi Chaitanya Arikela
 
The Big Bang - Upgrading to Banner 8.1
TJ Rains
 
bhanu prasadTeradataDev
Bhanu Prasad
 
Read Curriculum vitae of Shwetabh Kumar as Project Manager at Deloitte
shwetabhkumar
 
Sandeep_Pawar_CV
Sandeep Pawar
 
Resume of Shwetabh Kumar, Project Manager at Deloitte
shwetabhkumar
 
Shibumon Manaveettil CV
Shibumon Manaveettil
 
What is performance_engineering_v0.2
Trevor Warren
 
Downloads abc 2006 presentation downloads-ramesh_babu
Hem Rana
 
Bhanu prasad profile
Bhanu Prasad
 
Adi CV Tech Manager
Satyanarayan Adi
 
Dev area wip
Barbara Romina Klurfan
 
Dev area wip
Barbara Romina Klurfan
 
Sandeep Gupta_ProductSpecialist_3.8yrs
sandeep Gupta
 
Ad

More from AgileNetwork (20)

PDF
ANIn Mumbai 2025 | Measuring Business Value during Agile Transformation by Pr...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
ANIn Ahmedabad 2025 | Quality as Foundation of Business Agility: How QA Enabl...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
ANIn Ahmedabad 2025 | Beyond Survival: Enabling Growth Mindset by Abhishek Bh...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Emerging patterns in Agentic AI by Bharani Su...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 Ideathon | AI Powered Microfinance Literacy Gui...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 Ideathon | Crypton- an AI driven, Quantum Resis...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Leading with Integrity in the Age of AI – A C...
AgileNetwork
 
PDF
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Workshop - Leadership in an Uncertain World: ...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | The Human Metrics of Agile: Building Resilien...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Adaptive Organizations: Built to Learn, Ready...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Workshop - Enhancing Agile Collaboration with...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | The Purpose Playbook: Building AI that Solves...
AgileNetwork
 
PDF
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | The Story of KM Implementation for enabling V...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Beyond Survival: Resilience Through Agility a...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Kanban: The Shop Floor’s Secret to Smooth Wor...
AgileNetwork
 
PDF
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Unpacking OKRs: A Guide to Strategic Sophisti...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Agility for Resilience - Adaptive Systems & C...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Redefining Customer Centricity by Aarthi Ramesh
AgileNetwork
 
PDF
ANIn Bengaluru 2025 | Workshop- Innovate For Business Agility: Idea Generatio...
AgileNetwork
 
PPTX
ANIn Bengaluru 2025 | Working Smarter: The Fusion of Agile Mindsets and AI Mi...
AgileNetwork
 
ANIn Mumbai 2025 | Measuring Business Value during Agile Transformation by Pr...
AgileNetwork
 
ANIn Ahmedabad 2025 | Quality as Foundation of Business Agility: How QA Enabl...
AgileNetwork
 
ANIn Ahmedabad 2025 | Beyond Survival: Enabling Growth Mindset by Abhishek Bh...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Emerging patterns in Agentic AI by Bharani Su...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 Ideathon | AI Powered Microfinance Literacy Gui...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 Ideathon | Crypton- an AI driven, Quantum Resis...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Leading with Integrity in the Age of AI – A C...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Workshop - Leadership in an Uncertain World: ...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | The Human Metrics of Agile: Building Resilien...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Adaptive Organizations: Built to Learn, Ready...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Workshop - Enhancing Agile Collaboration with...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | The Purpose Playbook: Building AI that Solves...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | The Story of KM Implementation for enabling V...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Beyond Survival: Resilience Through Agility a...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Kanban: The Shop Floor’s Secret to Smooth Wor...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Unpacking OKRs: A Guide to Strategic Sophisti...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Agility for Resilience - Adaptive Systems & C...
AgileNetwork
 
Agile Chennai 18-19 July 2025 | Redefining Customer Centricity by Aarthi Ramesh
AgileNetwork
 
ANIn Bengaluru 2025 | Workshop- Innovate For Business Agility: Idea Generatio...
AgileNetwork
 
ANIn Bengaluru 2025 | Working Smarter: The Fusion of Agile Mindsets and AI Mi...
AgileNetwork
 

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
The Rise and Fall of 3GPP – Time for a Sabbatical?
3G4G
 
PDF
Modernizing your data center with Dell and AMD
Principled Technologies
 
PPTX
PA Analog/Digital System: The Backbone of Modern Surveillance and Communication
AVTRON Technologies LLC
 
PDF
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
IAESIJAI
 
PDF
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
gurumoop
 
PDF
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
SOFTTECHHUB
 
PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Brian McKeiver
 
PDF
CIFDAQ's Market Insight: SEC Turns Pro Crypto
CIFDAQ
 
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25 Week I
NewMind AI
 
PDF
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
SandeepSingh286037
 
PDF
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
Serpent6
 
PDF
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis method based random forest with bat algorithm
IAESIJAI
 
PDF
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
IAESIJAI
 
PPT
Teaching material agriculture food technology
LiaRayya
 
PPTX
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
memembruh336
 
PPTX
Effective Security Operations Center (SOC) A Modern, Strategic, and Threat-In...
ReZa AdineH
 
PDF
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
30anthuong17
 
PDF
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
OmerMohamed64
 
PDF
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
SOFTTECHHUB
 
PDF
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
Jian-Hong Pan
 
The Rise and Fall of 3GPP – Time for a Sabbatical?
3G4G
 
Modernizing your data center with Dell and AMD
Principled Technologies
 
PA Analog/Digital System: The Backbone of Modern Surveillance and Communication
AVTRON Technologies LLC
 
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
IAESIJAI
 
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
gurumoop
 
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
SOFTTECHHUB
 
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Brian McKeiver
 
CIFDAQ's Market Insight: SEC Turns Pro Crypto
CIFDAQ
 
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25 Week I
NewMind AI
 
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
SandeepSingh286037
 
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
Serpent6
 
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis method based random forest with bat algorithm
IAESIJAI
 
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
IAESIJAI
 
Teaching material agriculture food technology
LiaRayya
 
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
memembruh336
 
Effective Security Operations Center (SOC) A Modern, Strategic, and Threat-In...
ReZa AdineH
 
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
30anthuong17
 
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
OmerMohamed64
 
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
SOFTTECHHUB
 
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
Jian-Hong Pan
 

How Meark as an enterprise leverages DSDM?

  • 1. Presented by Meark Enterprise Private Limited  Consulting, IT Products and Services organization established in Feb 2016.  ISO 9001 (Quality) and ISO 27001 (Information Security) certified organization Meark’s Vision To provide significant value to our clients by architecting optimized processes and systems for efficient business functioning. Sectors  Agriculture  Education and Skilling  Public sector  Retail  Banking  Insurance  Healthcare  Manufacturing Our Focus Solutions devoted to users not technologies.
  • 2. Nithya Subramaniam Managing Director Meark Enterprise Private Limited How Meark as an Enterprise Leverages DSDM? Nithya has more than 16 years of experience and is a recognized expert in the software business analysis and architecture field . She currently leads the Exploration and Engineering teams of Meark to deliver Consulting, IT Services and Products enabling clients to do business better by technology and process changes. Her earlier roles include Consultant and Senior Manager for Innovations, Campus Management Corp. Product Manager, NEC India Practice manager for Higher Education Sector , Wipro Multiple business analysis engagements in the retail sector, Wipro
  • 3. How Meark as an Enterprise Leverages DSDM? © Meark Enterprise Private Limited Document Classification: Restricted Sharing Organizers and Participants
  • 4. Presented by Agenda Why DSDM? Better Visibility Freedom to Choose Structured Reviews, No Surprises! Performance Concise Communication Going Forward © Meark Enterprise Private Limited Document Classification: Restricted Sharing Organizers and Participants
  • 6. Presented by Our Challenges One Hero Analysis Paralysis Priority Anchor The right delivery guy Over-engineering Director The Expert of Options Safe Commitmen t Owner
  • 7. Presented by Why DSDM Framework? Start-up Model to follow One ofAgile And a proven model Gain Compliance For ISO and CMMI Standards Easy to Communicate Less documentation Focus on Output DSDM (1994) Iterative and Incremental  To provide more discipline to the rapid application development . IT and Non-IT Projects Agile Manifesto (2001) Individuals and interactions  over processes and tools Working software  over comprehensive documentation Customer collaboration  over contract negotiation Responding to change  over following a plan
  • 8. Presented by What is Dynamic Systems Development Method(DSDM) Focus on the business need Deliver on time Collaborate Never compromise quality Build incrementally from firm foundations Develop iteratively Communicate continuously and clearly Demonstrate control Principles Prioritisation Technique – MoSCoW Must Have 60% Should Have 20% Could Have 20 % Won’t Have Timebox Plan Iterative 4 Week Sprints Terms of Reference Benefit Assessment 8 6 Phases
  • 9. Evolutionary Development : Exploration+ Engineering Sprints Team Structure
  • 10. Presented by DSDM Timebox A DSDM structured timebox A free format timebox
  • 12. Presented by Exploration to Engineering Execution Prioritised Requirements List - Storyboard
  • 14. Presented by Better Visibility Missed components and priorities due to definition misses. [ One board] Missed components and priorities due to definition misses. [ One board] Better visibility for planning. [Two boards – Exploration and Engineering] Better visibility for planning. [Two boards – Exploration and Engineering] PC Project Co-ordinator Before Before After After
  • 15. Freedom to Choose within the boundary
  • 16. Presented by Engineering then Exploration Sprints
  • 17. Presented by DSDM - Prioritisation Technique Prioritisation Technique – MoSCoW Must Have - 60% Should have - 20% Could have - 20 % Won’t have
  • 18. Presented by Freedom to Choose within the boundary Project Co-ordinator 1. Team’s identify component’s to built 1. Team’s identify component’s to built 1. Mark identified sprint components they choose to do for the day 1. Mark identified sprint components they choose to do for the day Before Before After After
  • 20. Meark – Exploration Sprint Sprint Exploration Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week 1 UI Story(PRL) and Wireframes SAT Meeting PA, Email TA _ _ _ UI Draft UI SAT, TL _ _ _ UI Refinement UI, SAT Meeting PA, Email TA DB Design TL/TA TL/TA UI Optimization UI, SAT Meeting PA, TA DB Review TL/TA PA Week 4 MoSCoW, Timeboxplan* PC, PA EmailTA, Developer,TL SRS Document SAT PA Engineering Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week1 Code with UI DEV, TL Prepare Test cases and Test Data SAT PA Code with SRS Document DEV, TL _ _ _ Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ _ _ Bug Fixing DEV, TL SAT Daily Buglist SAT DEV,TL Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ Test Report Draft User Guide SAT _ Retrospective Meeting, Next Sprint planning PC,ALL _ Timeboxreview record*/Project ReviewReport* SAT,PC _ Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Assemble Review Deploy to UAT TL,TA TA User Guide SAT PA Deploy to Prod/Demo TL,TA TA End User Training SAT, PA _ Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Business Case, Priortized Requirements List PA _ Solution Architecture Definition PA,TA PC DeliveryPlan, Management Approach Definition PC TA,PA Development Approach Definition TA PC Legend Reference for further reading: https://www.agilebusiness.org/ Feasibility Phase Foundations Phase Project Closure Meark - Dynamic Systems Development Method(DSDM) - SDLC Version 5.0 * represents Milestone Products SAT- Solution Analyst and Tester UI-UI Developer TL- Team Lead DEV-Developer PC- Project Co-ordinator PA- Process Architect TA- TechnicalArchitect Pre-Project Phase Terms of Reference* Feasibility Assessment (PC)* Foundation Summary(PC)* Deployment Phase Week4 Week2,3 Code Review per component by TL/Dev Weekly Code Optimization by TA Post - Project Phase Benefits Assessment DSDM Evolutionary Products (Optional) Week4 Week 2,3 Evolutionary Development Phase - Exploration + Engineering Draft Refinement Optimization Exploration States Sprint Exploration Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week 1 UI Story (PRL) and Wireframes SAT Meeting PA, Email TA _ _ _ UI Draft UI SAT, TL _ _ _ UI Refinement UI, SAT Meeting PA, Email TA DB Design TL/TA TL/TA UI Optimization UI, SAT Meeting PA, TA DB Review TL/TA PA Week 4 MoSCoWComponent List , Timeboxplan* PC, PA, TA TL, SAT Validations, Notiifcations, SRS Document SAT PA Week 2,3 Evolutionary Development Phase - Exploration + Engineering
  • 22. Presented by 100+Components – Validation List is at One place
  • 23. Presented by Structured Reviews, Yet in any Order! 1. UI multiple-changes as Issue 2. Developers work on changing UI 1. UI multiple-changes as Issue 2. Developers work on changing UI 1. UI in Exploration Sprint 2. 3 level UI reviews yield best possible design 3. Validations upfront 1. UI in Exploration Sprint 2. 3 level UI reviews yield best possible design 3. Validations upfront Before Before After After PA SAT UI
  • 24. Meark – Engineering Sprint Sprint Exploration Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week 1 UI Story(PRL) and Wireframes SAT Meeting PA, Email TA _ _ _ UI Draft UI SAT, TL _ _ _ UI Refinement UI, SAT Meeting PA, Email TA DB Design TL/TA TL/TA UI Optimization UI, SAT Meeting PA, TA DB Review TL/TA PA Week 4 MoSCoW, Timeboxplan* PC, PA EmailTA, Developer,TL SRS Document SAT PA Engineering Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week1 Code with UI DEV, TL Prepare Test cases and Test Data SAT PA Code with SRS Document DEV, TL _ _ _ Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ _ _ Bug Fixing DEV, TL SAT Daily Buglist SAT DEV,TL Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ Test Report Draft User Guide SAT _ Retrospective Meeting, Next Sprint planning PC,ALL _ Timeboxreview record*/Project ReviewReport* SAT,PC _ Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Assemble Review Deploy to UAT TL,TA TA User Guide SAT PA Deploy to Prod/Demo TL,TA TA End User Training SAT, PA _ Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Business Case, Priortized Requirements List PA _ Solution Architecture Definition PA,TA PC DeliveryPlan, Management Approach Definition PC TA,PA Development Approach Definition TA PC Legend Reference for further reading: https://www.agilebusiness.org/ Feasibility Phase Foundations Phase Project Closure Meark - Dynamic Systems Development Method(DSDM) - SDLC Version 5.0 * represents Milestone Products SAT- Solution Analyst and Tester UI-UI Developer TL- Team Lead DEV-Developer PC- Project Co-ordinator PA- Process Architect TA- TechnicalArchitect Pre-Project Phase Terms of Reference* Feasibility Assessment (PC)* Foundation Summary(PC)* Deployment Phase Week4 Week2,3 Code Review per component by TL/Dev Weekly Code Optimization by TA Post - Project Phase Benefits Assessment DSDM Evolutionary Products (Optional) Week4 Week 2,3 Evolutionary Development Phase - Exploration + Engineering Code Review Release Engineering Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week 1 Code with UI DEV, TL Prepare Test cases and Test Data SAT PA Code with SRS Document DEV, TL _ _ _ Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ _ _ Bug Fixing DEV, TL SAT Daily Bug list SAT DEV,TL Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ Test Report Draft User Guide SAT _ Retrospective Meeting, Next Sprint planning PC,ALL _ Timeboxreview record*/Project ReviewReport* SAT,PC _ Week 4 Week 2,3 Code Reviewper component by TL/Dev Weekly Code Optimization by TA Engineering States
  • 25. Presented by Structured Reviews, Yet in any Order! 1. Daily Dependency on Architect in Development 1. Daily Dependency on Architect in Development Only reviews and logic complexity requires intervention of technical architect. Only reviews and logic complexity requires intervention of technical architect. Before Before After After TA TL, DEV
  • 26. Presented by Meark -Sample Monthly Sprint Planner and Tracker Sprint Items Responsible Duratio n in Hrs Planned Work Dates Responsible Person Completion Status Overall Status Tester Confirmatio n Technical Review and Dependency Functional Review and Dependency Organization Registration Public Page - Resolving Duplicate Registration Issue CR - SCR -USR- ORS-014 Dev A 4 7 Completed Completed Completed NA Completed Manage GST and Fee – SCR -USR- ORS-012 Dev A 6 7 Completed Open Completed Completed Completed Manage Subscription – SCR-VMS–SUB -002 Dev B 24 Open Open Completed Completed Completed View Subscription Packs – Public page - SCR-VMS–SUB -002 Dev A 24 15,22,29 Completed Open Completed Completed Completed Payment Registration and Integration for Sports 2. with Receipt Generation Dev C 8 8,15,22,1 Open Open Pending Completed Completed Website update – Inclusion of New content page SCR-WES–POR -034 Dev C 4 22 Completed Completed NA NA Completed Available duration for Sprint in hours starting 1st Dec 160
  • 29. Presented by Meark – Performance - Sample View of a Month SN Key Performance Areas (KPA) Key Performance Indicator (KPI) Max Score Associate Score Associate Score Associate Score Associate Score Associate Score Sprint PerformanceProject Team Performance as determined by Quality of Sprint Deliverables or Opportunities created/capitalized. 50 30 49.5 30 42 49.5 1Deliver on Time 1a. Focus on business priorities. Guarantee Minimum Usable Subset. 1b.Always hit deadlines. Ability to stretch when work is incomplete/ required for business by self or as requested. 2a. For Dev and SAT: Occurrences of missing requirements as identified in testing/review. Pro-active scheduling of Review/UAT with Manger/customer and ensuring sign-off. Zero delays. 10 6 10 5 9 10 2Never Compromise Quality 1. Adherence to provided formats for Email Signature, Release emails. For Developer: Code Conventions, Quality of code as identified in review by TL/TA. For SAT : Quality of requirement and test document with coverage of scenarios, as reviewed by PA/PM/Client. 2. For Developer: Defects/unresolved issue re-opened by tester and manager. For SAT: Defect identified by manger/customer post system release. 10 8 10 8 8 9.5 3Embrace Change, Experiment and Learn 1a. Instances of Exploration and Implementation of new UI pattern/Technology component/ New Applications/ Application Improvements. 1b. Accept change positively and handle changing workloads in response to changing circumstances. 2a. Learning sessions participated at least 6 hrs. 2b. Learning conducted/showcased at least 1, min of 30 mins. Willingness to learn new skills, attend self-improvement training. 10 5 9.5 6 8 10 4Collaborate, Communicate Continuously and Clearly 1a. Participation is delayed/absent in meetings/ Sprint sessions. 1b. Pro-active scheduling of required reviews/meetings. Pro-active transparent communication of a) change in time, in case of delay, b) change in task from what is planned on daily/given task. Number of times follow-up email where received. 2a. Daily update in Kanban and email without follow-up. Appropriate Response for query post in email within 30 mins during work hours. Clear and independent communication without grammatical errors. When Associate/Manager is not available for immediate clarification for doubt, has mail been sent out immediately. For SAT includes: Presence in project kick-off call with TA. 2b. Early communication of leave request, permission requirement. Maximum of 2 permission per month. 10 7 10 7 8 10 5Initiatives Initiatives as recognized by the Manager 10 8 10 8 9 10 Total 100 64 99 64 84 99
  • 30. Presented by Team Performance Ratings – In Sprint too! 1. 6 months feedback meetings on 10 competencies 2. Yearly appraisals 1. 6 months feedback meetings on 10 competencies 2. Yearly appraisals 1. Monthly Feedback Emails and Awards 2. Rated based on 5 points by PA/TA 3. Yearly appraisals 1. Monthly Feedback Emails and Awards 2. Rated based on 5 points by PA/TA 3. Yearly appraisals Before Before After After Team
  • 32. Presented by DSDM – Detailed in 2 Pages Our workplan and output for each week of the month sprint and increment RACI Matrix For each output Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed
  • 33. Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Wireframes SAT Meeting PA, Email TA _ _ _ UI Draft UI SAT, TL _ _ _ UI Refinement UI, SAT Meeting PA, Email TA DB Design TL/TA TL/TA UI Optimization UI, SAT Meeting PA,Email TA DB Review TL/TA PA MoSCoW, Timeboxplan* SAT,PA EmailTA, Developer,TL _ _ _ Sprint In Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Week 1 Code with UI DEV, TL SRS Document SAT PA Code with SRS Document DEV, TL Prepare Test cases and Test Data SAT PA Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ _ _ Bug Fixing DEV, TL SAT Daily Bug list SAT DEV,TL Release emailfor testing DEV, TL, SAT _ Test Report Draft User Guide SAT _ Retrospective Meeting, Next Sprint planning PC,ALL _ Timeboxreview record*/Project ReviewReport* SAT,PC _ Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Assemble Review Deploy to UAT TL,TA TA User Guide SAT PA Deploy to Prod/Demo TL,TA TA End User Training SAT, PA _ Output Responsible Reviewer Output Responsible Reviewer Business Case, Priortized Requirements List PA _ Solution Architecture Definition PA,TA PC Delivery Plan, Management Approach Definition PC TA,PA Development Approach Definition TA PC Evolutionary Development Phase User Interface Post - Project Phase Benefits Assessment* DSDM Evolutionary Products (Optional) Week 4 Feasibility Phase Foundations Phase Project Closure Meark - Dynamic Systems Development Method(DSDM) - SDLC Version 4.0 Pre-Project Phase Terms of Reference* Feasibility Assessment (PC)* Foundation Summary (PC)* Deployment Phase Week 4 Week 2,3 Code Reviewper component by TL/Dev Weekly Code Database SN DSDM Phase Project Activities PC PA TA SAT UI TL/DEV 1 Pre-Project Phase Terms of Reference* I RA C I - - 2 Feasibility Phase Feasibility Assessment (PC)* RA C C C - - 3 Foundation Summary Foundation Summary (PC)* RA RA C C - - 4 Foundation Summary Provide Functional requirements I RA I C - - 5 Foundation Summary Delivery Plan RA C C C - - 6 Evolutionary Development Phase UI - Wireframes I A C R - - 7 Evolutionary Development Phase UI - Draft I I I AC R - 8 Evolutionary Development Phase UI- Refinement I C C AC R - 9 Evolutionary Development Phase UI - Optimization I C C AC R - 10 Evolutionary Development Phase DB Design I C RA C - - 11 Evolutionary Development Phase DB Review I C RA C - - 12 Evolutionary Development Phase Provide Component IDs (Screens/Reports/APIs) I C I RA - - 13 Evolutionary Development Phase SRS Document I C I RA - - 14 Evolutionary Development Phase Review SRS I RA I C - - 15 Evolutionary Development Phase Write SRS Requirements with DB Table names I I C RA - - 16 Evolutionary Development Phase Write Scripting in Json templates (if required) I I C RA - I 17 Evolutionary Development Phase Identify TL/DEV, Plan Sprint,MoSCoW,Timebox plan* RA C C C I I 18 Evolutionary Development Phase Team Specific Sprint Meetings and daily progress update RA C C C I I 19 Evolutionary Development Phase Provide KT to Developer I C I RA - I 20 Evolutionary Development Phase Dev Kickoff call I - RA C - C 21 Evolutionary Development Phase Prepare Test cases and Test Data I C I RA - - 22 Evolutionary Development Phase Code with UI I C C C C RA 23 Evolutionary Development Phase Code with SRS Document and Unit Test I C C C C RA 24 Evolutionary Development Phase Provide Functional clarification to developers I C C RA C I 25 Evolutionary Development Phase Provide Technical clarification to developers I - RA C C C 26 Evolutionary Development Phase Review development progress in Daily Sprint calls RA I I C - C 27 Evolutionary Development Phase Release Multiple Cycles - Release Email I I C I - RA 28 Evolutionary Development Phase Test Multiple Cycles -Smoke Test Accept/Reject, Daily Bug list I I I RA - C 29 Evolutionary Development Phase End of Sprint - Retrospective Meeting, Next Sprint planning RA C C C C C 30 Evolutionary Development Phase Timebox Review Record* C C RA I I I 30 Deployment Phase Project Review Report* RA C I I I I 31 Deployment Phase Assemble Review Deploy to UAT I I C I - RA 32 Deployment Phase User Guide I C I RA - C 33 Deployment Phase Conduct UAT and get Sign-off I C I RA - - 34 Deployment Phase End User Training I C I RA - - 35 Deployment Phase Deploy to Prod I I C I - RA 36 Post - Project Phase Benefits Assessment* C RA I C - - 37 Any Phase- Evolutionary Products Business Case, Priortized Requirements List I RA C C - - 38 Any Phase- Evolutionary Products Delivery Plan, Management Approach Definition RA C C C - - 39 Any Phase- Evolutionary Products Solution Architecture Definition C A R I - - 40 Any Phase- Evolutionary Products Development Approach Definition C C RA I - - Legend: * represents Milestone products Responsible  Those who do the work to complete the task Accountable  One ultimately answerable for correctness and completion Consulted  Those whose opinions are sought Informed  Those who are kept up-to-date on progress DSDM RACI Matrix Version 4.0 RACI
  • 35. Going Forward 1. Attempt better Sprint Cycles for UI teams 2. Sprint Progress Based Morning Reports
  • 36. What we do at Meark
  • 37. Presented by Meark Products Visitark Stark Inspectark Inspection Management Spark Devark Sector Specific Sector Agnostic Skillar Skill and Placements for Skilling Sector Agriark Agriculture Produce Aggregator Visitor Management Guest Houses and Halls Management Alumni and Placement for Education Sector Event Management for Education Sector
  • 38. Presented by Meark Services Integration with Enterprise and National systems Robotic Process Automation Reporting and Analytics Mobile Apps in Cordova / PWA Website Development   Application Design & Development 
  • 39. Our Clients and End Clients/ Users of Meark Now Anthology Talisma Corporation Pvt. Ltd TNSDC CET Maharashtra Directorate of Technical Education, Chhattisgarh  Development partners Indian Center for Social Transformation, Tech Mahindra.  Interfaces with IMD, ISRO, ICAR, DACFW, NWIC, CGWB  End users Farmers, Farm Suppliers and Buyers
  • 40. Ability to see vehicles on the Maps with statuses and geocoding Vehicle Tracking RFID based Bin Tracking - Pharmacy Distribution Company