IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storied Building with Floating Column

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 07 Issue: 01 | Jan 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2020, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.34 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 1244
Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied Building with Floating Column
Shivam Wankhade1, Prof. M. Shahezad2, Dr.N.W.Ingole3
1PG student, Civil Engg. Department, PRMIT & R, Badnera, SGBAU University, Maharashtra, India.
2Professor, Civil Engg. Department, PRMIT & R, Badnera, SGBAU University, Maharashtra, India.
3Professor, Civil Engg. Department, PRMIT & R, Badnera, SGBAU University, Maharashtra, India.
----------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - In recent times, multi-storey buildings in urban
cities are required to have column free space due to shortage
of space, population and also for aesthetic and functional
requirements. For this buildings are provided with floating
column at one or more storey. In the seismic region the
construction of these floating columns are highly
disadvantages. The earthquake forces that are developed at
different floor levels in a building need to be carried down
along the height to the ground by shortest path. Deviation or
discontinuity in this load transfer path results in poor
performance of the building. The object of present work is to
study the behaviour of multistorey buildings having floating
column under various seismic forces. For this purpose three
cases of multi-storey buildings are considered having 12
storey, 14 storey and 16 storey. All three cases are considered
having floating column at 8th storey and also analysed for
zone II, zone III, zone IV and zone V by using software ETABS
2017. Observation shows that the provision of floatingcolumn
is advantageous in increases FSI of the building but is a risky
factor and increases the vulnerability of the building. It is
observed from the analysis that lateral displacement and
storey drift of building increases from lower to higher zones
because the magnitude of intensity will be more for higher
zones. This analysis work provides a beneficial help on the
parameter lateral displacement and storey drift in the
multistorey building having floating column.
Key Words Floating column, Seismic analysis, Lateral
displacement, Storey Drift, ETABS 2017.
1. INTRODUCTION
A column is said to be a vertical member starting from
foundation and transferring the load to the bottom level.
When a vertical element ends at its lower level and rests on
beam which is horizontal member that is floating column. It
act as a point load on the beam and the load transfers by
these beams to the column below it. Theoretically these
types of structures can be analysed and designed. This is
widely used in high storied buildings for both commercial
and residential purpose. These buildingareconsideredto be
safe under gravity loads and are designed only for gravity
loads not for seismic loads. Hence these buildings may be
unsafe in seismic prone areas. When these floating columns
are employed in buildings in seismic prone areas, the entire
earthquake of the system is shared by the column or the
shear wall without considering any contribution from
floating columns. Many urban multistoreybuildingsinIndia
today have open first storey as an unavoidablefuture. Thisis
primarily being adopted to accommodate parking or
reception lobbies in the first storey. Whereas the total
seismic base shear as experienced by a building during an
earthquake is dependent on its natural period, the seismic
force distribution is dependent on the distribution of
stiffness and mass along the height. The behavior of a
building during earthquakes depends criticallyonitsoverall
shape, size and geometry, in addition to how the earthquake
forces are carried to the ground. Buildings that have fewer
columns or walls in a particular storey or with unusuallytall
storey tend to damage or collapse which is initiated in that
storey. Many buildings with an open groundstoreyintended
for parking collapsed or were severely damaged in Gujarat
during the 2001 Bhuj earthquake. Buildings with columns
that hang or float on beams at an intermediate storeyand do
not go all the way to the foundation, have discontinuities in
the load transfer path.
2. OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
1. To study the behavior of multistorey buildings having
floating column under earthquake excitations.
2. To compare the behavior of multistorey buildings with
floating columns under different seismic zone.
3. To find whether the structure is safe or unsafe with
floating column when built in seismically active areas.
4. Find out the effect on different designparametersunder
seismic effects due to presence of floating column.
5. Design of building with floating column using ETABS
2017.
6. To compare the results of all the models as obtained.

3. METHODOLOGY
For analysis and study purpose multi-storey building that is
G+12, G+14, G+16 buildings are consider and themodels are
developed as multi-storey building with floating column
where these floating column are present at 8th story of the
building analysing it at different zones as zone II tozoneVas
per codal provisions. Response spectrumanalysisisadopted
which shows best result.
4. MODEL DESCRIPTION
Three cases of residential buildingsareconsidered.Incase-I,
total 12 storeys are provided with building area 21mx 21m.
In case-II, total 14 storeys are provided with building area
21m x 21m. In case-III, total 16 storeys are provided with
building area 21m x 21m. For all cases floating column
provided from 8th storey. To study the behaviour the
response parameters selected are lateral displacement and
story drift. All the cases are assumed to be located in zone II,
zone III, zone IV, zone V. Height of each storey is kept 3.0m
and other concerned data is given in tabular form in table -1
Table -1: Building Description
No. of Storey G+12 G+14 G+16
Beam
Diamension
Zone II to IV
230mm X
450mm
Zone II to III
230mm X
450mm
Zone II to V
300mm X
700mm
Zone V
300mm X
700mm
Zone IV to V
300mm X
700mm
Column
Diamension
Zone II to IV
300mm X
750mm
Zone II to III
300mm X
750mm
Zone II to V
450mm X
900mm
Zone V
450mm X
900mm
Zone IV to V
450mm X
900mm
Thickness of
Slab
150mm 150mm 150mm
Seismic Zone II to V II to V II to V
Type of Soil Medium Medium Medium
Frame Type SMRF SMRF SMRF
Response
Reduction
Factor
5 5 5
Importance
Factor
1.2 1.2 1.2
Time Period 0.707 0.824 0.942
Live load 3 KN/m2 3 KN/m2 3 KN/m2
Floor Finish 1KN/m2 1KN/m2 1KN/m2
Wall load on
exterior beam
12KN/m 12KN/m 12KN/m
Wall load on
Interior beam
6KN/m 6KN/m 6KN/m
Grade of
Concrete
M30 M30 M30
Grade of Steel Fe500 Fe500 Fe500
Case I :
In case I building area of 21m x 21m is taken. The is of
(G+12) configuration, having story height of 3m. The size of
beam are taken as 230mm x 450mm and column are taken
as 300mm x 750mm throughout the height of building. For
the overall building the dimensionof beam,columnaresame
in both X and Y direction. Floating column are present at 8th
story of the building analysing it at different zones as zone II
to zone V as per codal provisions. For zone V building
members are failed to withstand for the applied gravityload
and lateral loads. So another building consideringforzoneV
is created by changing the dimensionof memberto makethe
building to withstand for the applied gravity loads and
lateral loads. For this model all beam dimensions are taken
as 300mm x 700mm and for columndimensionsaretakenas
450mm x 900mm.
Case II :
In case II building area of 21m x 21m is taken. The is of
to zone V as per codal provisions. For zone IV and V building
and lateral loads. So another buildingconsideringforzoneIV
and zone V is created by changing the dimension of member
to make the building to withstand for the applied gravity
loads and lateral loads. For this model all beam dimensions
are taken as 300mm x 700mm and for column dimensions
are taken as 450mm x 900mm.

Case III:
In case III building area of 21m x 21m is taken. The is of
to zone V as per codal provisions. For all zones building
and lateral loads. So another building considering for all
zones is created by changing the dimension of member to
make the building to withstand for the applied gravity loads
and lateral loads. For this model all beam dimensions are
taken as 300mm x 700mm and for column dimensions are
taken as 450mm x 900mm.
Fig - 1 Plan of Building with Floating Column at 8th Floor
Fig -2 3D View of Building
Fig -3 Elevation of 12 storey building with floating column

Fig -4 Elevation of 14 Storey Building with Floating
Column
Fig -5 Elevation of 16 Storey Building with Floating
Column
5. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Response spectrum analysis is carriedoutonall thecasesfor
all seismic zones. The results are presented in the form of
graphs.
5.1 Lateral Displacement
Story displacement is the lateral movement of the structure
caused by lateral force. The deflected shape of a structure is
most important and most clearly visiblepointofcomparison
for any structure. Graph is plottedbytakingdisplacement as
the abscissa and the storey level as the ordinate for different
cases in the transverse and longitudinal direction. As per
code IS 456 : 2000 clause 20.5 page 33, displacement should
not be greater than total height of the structure by H/500.
Graph- 5.1 Storey displacement in X-direction for 12
storey building with floating Column
Graph- 5.2 Storey displacement in Y-direction for 12
storey building with floating Column

storey building with floating column
5.2 Storey Drift
Story drift is the relative displacement of the floor and
calculated as the difference of deflections of the floors at the
top and bottom of the story under a difference of deflections
of the floors at the top and bottom of the story under
consideration. According to IS1893:2016 (part I),maximum
limit for storey drift with partial load factor 1.0 is 0.004
times of storey height. Here for 3m height and load factor of
1.5, through maximum drift will be 12 mm.
Graph- 5.7 Inter storey drift in X-direction for 12 storey
building with floating column
Graph- 5.8 Inter storey drift in Y-direction for 12 storey

5.3 Fundamental Time Period
Fundamental time period is the time taken bythe building to
undergo a cycle of to and fro movement. The mode of
oscillation with smallest natural frequency(and largest
natural period) is called fundamental mode, the associated
natural period iscalledthefundamental timeperiod.Usually,
natural periods of 1 to 20 storey normal reinforced concrete
and steel buildings are in the range of 0.05 - 2.00 sec. In this
study fundamental time period determined from model
analysis. The variation offundamental timeperiodofvarious
models are as follows:
Model 1 : G+12 Building with floating column.
Model 1: G+12 Building with floating column.
Model 1: G+12 Building with floating column.
Graph- 5.13 Variation of Fundamental Time Period of
three model.
6. CONCLUSIONS
Within the scope of present work following conclusions are
drawn:
1. In all models storey drift and displacement values are
less for lower zone and it goes on increase for higher
zone because the magnitude of intensity will be more
for higher zone.

2. In zone V 12 storey building model, zone IV and V 14
storey building models and all zones 16 storey
building models displacement values crosses the
maximum permissible limit. Hence it is advised to
increase size of beam and column to reduce
displacement values.
3. For all cases displacement value is more for casesinY-
direction(RSY) when compared to cases inX-direction
(RSX).
4. The storey drift and displacement is more for floating
column buildings because as thecolumnsare removed
the mass gets increased and hence drift alsoincreases.
5. Drift value for all cases are safe within maximum
permissible limit and follow around similarpathalong
storey height with maximum value lying somewhere
near about middle storey.
6. The taller building have larger fundamental time
period and also fundamental time period of building
increase with increase in mass. Fundamental time
period of buildings reduce with increase in stiffness.
7. Fundamental time period of floating column building
is greater than normal building.
The final conclusion is that do not prefer to constructfloating
column buildings. With increase in dimensionsofallmember
also it getting more displacement than normal building and
cost for construction also increased. So avoid constructing
floating column for higher storey.
7. FUTURE SCOPE
1. Further it should study for floating column at
various position of building.
2. Floating column in irregular geometry.
3. Research can also be done on steel floating column.
4. Design and estimation of building is necessary used
for improvingtheseismic performanceofstructure.
5. The reaction at footing level is to be investigated
and modified for present study.
REFERENCES
[1] Arpit Shrivastav, Aditi Patidar, ‘Seismic Analysis of
Multistorey Building having Floating Column’, SSRG-
IJCE - Vol.05 ISSN:2348-8352.
[2] Kandukuri Sunitha, Mr. Kiran Kumar Reddy, ‘Seismic
Analysis of Multistorey Building having Floating
Column by using Tabs’, IJETSR-Vol.04 pp.933-943
[3] Deekshitha.R, Dr.H.S.Sureshchandra,, ‘Seismic Analysis
of Multistorey Building with and without Floating
Column’, IRJET - Vol.04 pp.2546-2550.
[4] Isha Rohilla, S.M. Gupta, Babita Saini, , ‘Seismic response
of Multistory Irregular Building with Floating Column’,
IJRET - Vol.04 pp.506-518.
[5] A.P. Mundada, S.G. Sawdatkar,, “Comparative seismic
analysis of Multistory Building with and without
Floating Column”, International Journal of Current
Engineering and Technology -Vol. 04 pp.3395-3400.
[6] Srikanth M.K., Yogeendra R. Holebagilu,(2014),“Seismic
response of complex buildings with floatingcolumnsfor
zone II and zone V”, IJOER- Vol.02 pp.1-11
[7] Keerthigowda B.S., Syed Tajoddeen, “Seismic analysisof
Multistory Building with floating column”, 1st annual
conference on innovations and developments in civil
engineering pp.528-535
[8] Sabari S, Praveen J.V., “Seismic analysis of multistory
building with floating column”, International Journal of
civil and Structural Engineering Research-Vol.02 pp12-
23.
[9] Sreekanth G.N., Pradeep K.R., Arunakanthi E,,"Seismic
Analysis of a Normal Building and Floating Column
Building", IJERT-Vol.03 pp981-987.
[10] Prerna Nautiyal, Saleem Akhtar, Geeta Batham,“Seismic
response evaluation of RC frame building with floating
column considering different soil conditions”. IJOER-
Vol.04 pp.10-15
[11] IS 456:2000 Plain and reinforced concrete code of
practice.
[12] IS 1893(Part 1): 2016 Criteria for earthquake resistant
design of structures part 1 general provisions and
buildings (fifth revision) bureau of Indian standards
new Delhi.
[13] IS 13920:2016 Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete
structures subjected to seismic forces-code of practice.
(dead load).
[14] IS 875 (Part 1)-1987 Ductile detailing of reinforced
concrete structures subjected to seismic forces-code of
practice. (live load )
[15] Agarwal Pankaj, Srikhande Manish (2009), Earthquake
resistant design of structures, PHI learning private
limited, New Delhi.

IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storied Building with Floating Column

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storied Building with Floating Column (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storied Building with Floating Column