SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Dr. A. Meher Prasad Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras email: prasadam@iitm.ac.in MASONRY CODES OF PRACTICE
ACI 530-02 / ASCE 5-02 / TMS 402-02  Minimum requirements for structural design and  Construction of masonry unit. Allowable Stress Design (ASD) Limit State Design (LSD) IBC 2000 NZS 4230: Part 1: 1990 Eurocode 6: Design of Masonry Structures IS: 1905 - 1987 Masonry Codes of Practice
Design Philosophies Working Stress Method (WSM) Ultimate Load Method (ULM) Limit States Method (LSM)
Design Philosophies … “ Limit states design” is supposed to be the most rational design philosophy.  Why?
Design Philosophies Working stress method ( WSM) - Behaviour under ‘service loads’    - All uncertainties accommodated in ‘factors of safety’    applied to material strengths Ultimate load method  (ULM)   - Behaviour under ‘ultimate loads’    - All uncertainties accommodated in ‘load factors’ WSM attempts to ensure adequate safety under service loads, while ULM attempts to ensure adequate safety under extreme loads. WSM does not investigate behaviour beyond service loads, ULM does not guarantee serviceability under service loads.
WSM and ULM WSM attempts to ensure adequate safety under service loads,   while ULM attempts to ensure adequate safety under extreme loads. WSM does not investigate behaviour beyond service loads,   ULM does not guarantee serviceability under service loads.
Limit States Method (LSM) A  limit state  is a state of impending  failure , beyond which a structure ceases to perform its intended function satisfactorily, in terms of either  strength  or  serviceability ; i.e., it either  collapses  or becomes  unserviceable .   Unlike  WSM , which bases calculations on service load conditions alone, and unlike  ULM , which bases calculations on ultimate load conditions alone,  LSM  aims for a comprehensive and rational solution to the design problem, by considering  safety  at ultimate loads and  serviceability  at working loads . LSM is described as a  ‘semi-probabilistic’ method   or a  ‘Level I reliability’ method
Strength Design Model pdf S n R n R  and  S  are independent random variables Probabilistic approach: nominal / characteristic values (deterministic) Moral:  There is always a risk of failure.   No structure is 100% safe! R      S     Structure will survive! R  <  S     Structure will fail!
F s   =  R n   /  S n P f   = Prob [ R   <  S ] Reliability = Probability of survival   = 1 - Probability of failure pdf S n R n Deterministic measure of safety: Probabilistic measure of safety: f S   ( s ) f R   ( r ) =  Prob
 R k       S k Load and Resistance Design (LRFD) Format Design Resistance     Design Load Effect     S n R n  S n   =   R n Load factor > 1 (‘overloading’) Resistance factor < 1 (‘understrength’)  (ULM format)  (WSM format)
Partial load and material safety factors Ultimate limit states – partial load factors: UL = 1.5 (DL + LL) UL = 1.5 (DL + QL) or (0.9DL + 1.5 QL) UL = 1.2 (DL + LL + QL) Note :  It is not correct to apply 33.3% increase in  allowable stress in WSM when only DL and QL  are involved! Ultimate limit states – material safety factors : Concrete:  = 1.5   Steel:  = 1.15
Design Philosophies Empirical Design Formulae for the design developed by experience Not a design analysis for sizing and proportioning  masonry elements For simple structures still being continued in ACI 530 – 02 and to some extent in IBC 2000 Imposes severe limitation on building height proportions IS 1905 – mixes empirical with allowable stress design
Design Philosophies ... Allowable Stress Design All uncertainties are accommodated in Factor of safety applied to material strength Under working loads, the stress developed in a member must be less than the permissible stress For URM, tensile stress in masonry is less than allowable limits and for RM, tensile stress neglected ACI follows this for URM and RM In IS code applies only to URM Does not find place in Eurocode, NZS 4230
Design Philosophies . . . Limit State Design Adopted by ACI, IBC 2000 and New Zealand  codes Proportion masonry members such that Design strength  ≥ Required strength where, Design strength = Nominal strength     φ     φ   is the strength reduction factor Required strength is computed from design  load combinations of building code
Eurocode - 6  Limit state design for Collapse and  Serviceability Partial safety factors for loads and  materials  are specified separately  instead of strength reduction factor Partial safety factor for loads depends  on the load combinations Partial safety factor for materials  depends on the type of masonry unit  and the failure mode
Assumptions in LSD and LRFD Strain continuity between reinforcement, grout and  masonry Max Compressive strain  ε mu  ≈ 0.0035 for clay material     ≈  0.0025 for concrete (CMU)     ≈   0.008 confined masonry ( NZ) Stress in steel, f s   = E s ε  ≤ f y   = f y  for  ε  ≥  ε y  (   =  f y /  E s )
Flexural strength is  assessed by neglecting tensile  strength of masonry But deflections assessed by including tensile strength   Masonry stress uniform over hatched block  0.8 f m  (ACI)  0.85f m  (IBC)   Assumptions in LSD and LRFD Equivalent rectangular masonry stress distribution Equivalent rectangular masonry stress distribution for confined masonry according to NZS
ACI  (f a  / F a )    1 f a   = Calculated compressive stress  F a  = Allowable compressive strength    = 0.25 f m  R Capacity reduction factor for slenderness Accounts for material uncertainties Axial Compression - ASD
R  = 1 – (h/40t) 2  for h/t  ≤ 29 R = (20t/h) 2     for h/t > 29 P ≤ ¼ P e  where Slenderness can affect capacity either as a result of inelastic buckling or because of additional bending moment Axial Compression - ASD
IS 1905 :1987:  a stress reduction factor k s  which depends on slenderness ratio and eccentricity of load (Table 9 of Code) Slenderness effects on axial compression Axial Compression - ASD
Image is not clear The previous fig is the same….
Slenderness ratio for different Eccentricities
Reinforced Masonry Axial Compression - ASD ACI 530-02 IBC 2000, NZS:4230: Part 1 ,  Eurocode 6, IS: 1905-1987 No Provisions have been given
Maximum  h/t Ratio There is no directly specified limit to the h/t ratio. It is indirectly specified through the check against Euler’s buckling formula ACI 530-02 IS: 1905-1987 Maximum h/t ratio depends on the storey height and type of mortar used. IBC 2000, NZS:4230: Part 1 ,  Eurocode 6 No Provisions have been given
Flexural stress due to eccentricity of axial loading application of horizontal loads such as wind and  earthquake loads ACI:   A member subjected to pure flexure only  Allowable bending compressive stress, F b  = 0.33 f m Calculated f b    F b Axial compression with flexure: ASD
Interaction formula Very conservative Axial compression with flexure: ASD
Axial compression with flexure: ASD Significance of M/Vd v  factor
IS 1905:1987 Bending compressive and tensile stresses Permissible value for bending compressive stress is increased by 25% and then reducing it for eccentric loading causing flexure. Permissible loads for 3 eccentric values e < t/24 t/24 < e < t/6 e > t/6 Applied moment converted into equivalent eccentricity Axial compression with flexure: ASD
 
e < t/24 t/24 < e < t/6 e > t/6 Axial compression with flexure: ASD
Axial compression with flexure  Flexure and Axial Wall Loading Interaction Diagram Reinforced Masonry
Design for Shear – ASD ACI 530-02 Shear stress shall not exceed either of  0.125  , 0.83MPa  or v+0.45N v /A n IBC 2000, NZS:4230: Part 1 ,  Eurocode 6 No Provisions have been given IS: 1905-1987 Permissible shear stress is given by: F v  = 0.1 +  /6  < 0.5MPa Un Reinforced Masonry
If shear reinforcement is not provided ACI 530-02 For flexural members, For shear walls, a. M/Vd v  < 1, F v  = 0.028[4-M/Vd v ] < (0.55-0.31M/Vd v )MPa b. M/Vd v  > 1, F v  =0.083  < 0.24MPa F v  = 0.083  < 0.35MPa, IBC 2000, NZS:4230: Part 1 ,  Eurocode 6, IS: 1905-1987 No Provisions have been given Design for Shear – ASD Reinforced Masonry
ACI 530-02 For flexural members, Fv = 0.25  < 1.03MPa For shear walls, a. M/Vd v  < 1, Fv = 0.042[4-M/Vdv]  < (0.82-0.031M/Vdv)MPa b. M/Vd v  > 1, Fv = 0.125  < 0.52MPa If shear reinforcement is provided Design for Shear – ASD Reinforced Masonry
IS: 1905-1987 Permissible shear stress is given by: Fv = 0.1 +  /6  <  0.5MPa IBC 2000, NZS:4230: Part 1 ,  Eurocode 6 No Provisions have been given ASD format If shear reinforcement is provided Design for Shear – ASD Reinforced Masonry
IS 1905:1987:   Shear Masonry load bearing walls also act as shear walls to resist in plane lateral loads. Shear failure in URM are: (3 modes) Diagonal tension cracks from through mortar and masonry units Design for Shear – ASD
 
Design for Shear – ASD Sliding occurs along a straight crack of horizontal bed joints While specifying Mohr coulomb type  failure criterion  Stepped cracks form, alternating from head joint to bed joint  depends on bond pattern of masonry
IS 1905:1987:   takes care of sliding failure by specifying permissible shear stress URM Average axial stress not more than 2.4 MPa
Allowable shear for reinforced walls
 
 
Capacity Design for strength of flanged wall
Effective Shear Areas
LSD
AXIAL COMPRESSION - LSD Un Reinforced Masonry: ACI 530-02 IS: 1905-1987, NZS:4230: Part 1  IBC 2000 Eurocode 6 Charactersistic Compressive strength of Masonry is Maximum compressive strain is limited to 0.002 No Provisions are given
Reinforced Masonry: ACI 530-02 Eurocode 6, IS: 1905-1987 No Provisions are given AXIAL COMPRESSION - LSD IBC 2000 NZS:4230: Part 1
AXIAL COMPRESSION WITH FLEXURE - LSD Un Reinforced Masonry: ACI 530-02,  IBC 2000, NZS:4230: Part 1, IS 1905- 1987  No Provisions are given Eurocode 6 1. Design Md equals   2. In case of vertical load,   increases to 3. Lateral resistance
AXIAL COMPRESSION WITH FLEXURE - LSD Reinforced Masonry: ACI 530-02 2. For walls with factored axial stress < 0.2f m , 1. For walls with factored axial stress < 0.05f m , and SR > 30 shall be designed as above with walls having t min =150mm. 3.  at extreme fiber is 0.0035 for clay masonry and  0.002 for concrete masonry.
AXIAL COMPRESSION WITH FLEXURE - LSD Reinforced Masonry: IBC 2000 1. For wall design against out-of-plane loads, all values are same as of the ACI code, except 2.  is the same as in the ACI code. NZS:4230: Part 1 1.  is 0.0025 for unconfined concrete masonry and 0.008 for confined concrete masonry Eurocode 6 For singly reinforced rectangular c/s subjected to bending only IS 1905- 1987 No provisions
DESIGN FOR SHEAR - LSD Un Reinforced Masonry: ACI 530-02 Nominal shear strength can be obtained from code section 3.3.4 IBC 2000 Nominal shear strength can be obtained from code section 2108.10.4.1 Eurocode 6 1. F v  = 0.1 +0.4 2. V n  = F v tl c /  IS: 1905-1987,  NZS:4230: Part 1 No Provisions
DESIGN FOR SHEAR - LSD Reinforced Masonry: ACI 530-02 1. V n  = V m  + V s 2. When M/Vd v  < 0.25, V n  < (0.083) 6A n   When M/Vd v  > 1.00, V n  < (0.083) 4A n   For M/Vd v  value between 0.25 and 1.00, V n  may be interpolated IBC 2000 Nominal shear strength is same as in the ACI code. 2. If shear wall failure mode is in flexure, M n  shall be at least 1.5M cr for fully grouted wall or 3M cr  for partially grouted wall.
DESIGN FOR SHEAR - LSD Reinforced Masonry: NZS:4230: Part 1 1. Shear strength is given in section 7.3.2.1 2. Minimum value of A v  = 0.15 b w s/f y 3.  4. Required area of shear friction reinforcement is Eurocode 6 1. Ignoring shear reinforcement: 2. Taking shear reinforcement into account: IS: 1905-1987 No Provisions

More Related Content

PPTX
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
PPTX
Problems on simply supported beams
PPTX
Shear Stress Distribution For Square Cross-section
PPTX
Wind loading
PPT
PDF
Lecture 1 design loads
PDF
Design philosophies
PDF
Hormigón Fotocatalitico FORTE
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Problems on simply supported beams
Shear Stress Distribution For Square Cross-section
Wind loading
Lecture 1 design loads
Design philosophies
Hormigón Fotocatalitico FORTE

What's hot (20)

PPT
Earned value
PDF
Mechanical Vibrations Theory and Applications 1st Edition Kelly Solutions Manual
PPTX
Singly reinforced beam ast - over reinforced
PPTX
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
PPTX
Singly reinforced beam design
PDF
Chapter 4-internal loadings developed in structural members
PDF
Single Degree of Freedom Systems
PDF
ME6603 - FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
PDF
Analysis of beam by plastic theory-part-I,
PPTX
Bending Stress In Beams
PPTX
Golden Section method
PPT
Energy method
PDF
Simplified notes of calculate Wind & Snow loads based on CYS EC1
PPTX
Relation between load shear force and bending moment of beams
PPT
Lecture 4 5 Urm Shear Walls
PDF
Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagram
PDF
Torsion of Non Circular Bars Saint Venants Theory
PPT
Trusses The Method Of Sections
PPTX
Seismic Analysis of regular & Irregular RCC frame structures
PDF
Lecture 2 principal stress and strain
Earned value
Mechanical Vibrations Theory and Applications 1st Edition Kelly Solutions Manual
Singly reinforced beam ast - over reinforced
ANALYSIS & DESIGN OF G+3 STORIED REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING
Singly reinforced beam design
Chapter 4-internal loadings developed in structural members
Single Degree of Freedom Systems
ME6603 - FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
Analysis of beam by plastic theory-part-I,
Bending Stress In Beams
Golden Section method
Energy method
Simplified notes of calculate Wind & Snow loads based on CYS EC1
Relation between load shear force and bending moment of beams
Lecture 4 5 Urm Shear Walls
Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagram
Torsion of Non Circular Bars Saint Venants Theory
Trusses The Method Of Sections
Seismic Analysis of regular & Irregular RCC frame structures
Lecture 2 principal stress and strain
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PDF
Risk evaluation according to standards cristina de hc tsuha
PDF
staad Reidar eurocode
PDF
Scia Engineer Eurocodes
PPTX
Analysis of Confined Masonry part 2
PPT
Krishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry walls
PDF
06 ec2 ws_frank_geotechnics
PPT
Ahmad measuremenr reliability and validity
PPTX
Analysis of Confined Masonry part 1
PPTX
Difficulty Index, Discrimination Index, Reliability and Rasch Measurement Ana...
PDF
Rcs1-Chapter2-Standards
PDF
Passage du bael à l'eurocode 2
PDF
Seismic assessment of buildings accordance to Eurocode 8 Part 3
DOC
shear strength of soil
PDF
Lecture 11 Shear Strength of Soil CE240
PPTX
Wall types
PPTX
REINFORCEMENT CONCRETE chapter 1
PDF
Class 6 Shear Strength - Direct Shear Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
PDF
CSI ETABS & SAFE MANUAL: Slab Analysis and Design to EC2
PPTX
PPTX
Wall type
Risk evaluation according to standards cristina de hc tsuha
staad Reidar eurocode
Scia Engineer Eurocodes
Analysis of Confined Masonry part 2
Krishna final overall ppt (2) eccentrically loaded masonry walls
06 ec2 ws_frank_geotechnics
Ahmad measuremenr reliability and validity
Analysis of Confined Masonry part 1
Difficulty Index, Discrimination Index, Reliability and Rasch Measurement Ana...
Rcs1-Chapter2-Standards
Passage du bael à l'eurocode 2
Seismic assessment of buildings accordance to Eurocode 8 Part 3
shear strength of soil
Lecture 11 Shear Strength of Soil CE240
Wall types
REINFORCEMENT CONCRETE chapter 1
Class 6 Shear Strength - Direct Shear Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
CSI ETABS & SAFE MANUAL: Slab Analysis and Design to EC2
Wall type
Ad

Similar to Masonry Code Of Practice Amp (20)

PDF
RCC Unit 003 (1).pdf
PDF
04-LRFD Concept (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
PDF
PPT5-BridgeLoadpdfload and load distribution
PPT
state-method.ppt
PDF
PPT
Limit state method
PDF
Lec.5 strength design method rectangular sections 1
PDF
DESIGN OF RC STRUCTURES.pdf
PDF
Technical_Report_STEEL_FRAMED_BUILDING-Seismic_Analysis.pdf
PPTX
RCC DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN BASICS.pptx
PPTX
Concept of ‘fatigue’ in welded steel
PPT
Design of steel structure (CE5G)-compression member.ppt
PDF
255877339-Creep-and-Fatigue.pdf
PDF
Reliability and LRFD Specification شرح الكود المصرى للأحمال ECP-201_ Ch.2 _...
DOCX
2 marks Question with Answer for Design of Reinforced Cement Concrete Elements
PDF
Comparison of Seismic Resistance of Moment Resisting RC Building using Shear ...
PDF
IRJET- Effect of Viscous Dampers on Response Reduction Factor for RCC Frame u...
PDF
Ch3 Design Considerations (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. M...
PPTX
Tub_Girder_Draft_Linked
PPTX
analysis of aircraft & aerospace structures.pptx
RCC Unit 003 (1).pdf
04-LRFD Concept (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
PPT5-BridgeLoadpdfload and load distribution
state-method.ppt
Limit state method
Lec.5 strength design method rectangular sections 1
DESIGN OF RC STRUCTURES.pdf
Technical_Report_STEEL_FRAMED_BUILDING-Seismic_Analysis.pdf
RCC DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN DESIGN BASICS.pptx
Concept of ‘fatigue’ in welded steel
Design of steel structure (CE5G)-compression member.ppt
255877339-Creep-and-Fatigue.pdf
Reliability and LRFD Specification شرح الكود المصرى للأحمال ECP-201_ Ch.2 _...
2 marks Question with Answer for Design of Reinforced Cement Concrete Elements
Comparison of Seismic Resistance of Moment Resisting RC Building using Shear ...
IRJET- Effect of Viscous Dampers on Response Reduction Factor for RCC Frame u...
Ch3 Design Considerations (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. M...
Tub_Girder_Draft_Linked
analysis of aircraft & aerospace structures.pptx

More from Teja Ande (20)

PPT
Numerical Methods
PPT
Sdof
PPT
Response Spectrum
PPT
Mdof
PPT
Ground Excited Systems
PPT
Approximate Methods
PPT
Base Excited Systems
PDF
Sam Session
PDF
Lesson14 Exmpl
PDF
Lesson14
PDF
Lesson10
PDF
Lesson9 2nd Part
PDF
Lesson8
PDF
Lesson9
PDF
Lecture 13 Building Populations
PDF
Lesson1
PDF
Lecture 11 Performance Based Evaluation
PPT
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
PDF
Lecture 10 Urm Out Of Plane Walls Part 2
PDF
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
Numerical Methods
Sdof
Response Spectrum
Mdof
Ground Excited Systems
Approximate Methods
Base Excited Systems
Sam Session
Lesson14 Exmpl
Lesson14
Lesson10
Lesson9 2nd Part
Lesson8
Lesson9
Lecture 13 Building Populations
Lesson1
Lecture 11 Performance Based Evaluation
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls
Lecture 10 Urm Out Of Plane Walls Part 2
Lecture 6 7 Rm Shear Walls

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Architecting across the Boundaries of two Complex Domains - Healthcare & Tech...
PDF
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
PPTX
Programs and apps: productivity, graphics, security and other tools
PDF
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
PPTX
Effective Security Operations Center (SOC) A Modern, Strategic, and Threat-In...
PDF
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25 Week I
PDF
MIND Revenue Release Quarter 2 2025 Press Release
PDF
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
PPT
“AI and Expert System Decision Support & Business Intelligence Systems”
PDF
The Rise and Fall of 3GPP – Time for a Sabbatical?
PPTX
Spectroscopy.pptx food analysis technology
PDF
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
PDF
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
PDF
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf
DOCX
The AUB Centre for AI in Media Proposal.docx
PDF
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
PDF
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
PPTX
sap open course for s4hana steps from ECC to s4
PPT
Teaching material agriculture food technology
Architecting across the Boundaries of two Complex Domains - Healthcare & Tech...
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
Programs and apps: productivity, graphics, security and other tools
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
Effective Security Operations Center (SOC) A Modern, Strategic, and Threat-In...
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25 Week I
MIND Revenue Release Quarter 2 2025 Press Release
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
“AI and Expert System Decision Support & Business Intelligence Systems”
The Rise and Fall of 3GPP – Time for a Sabbatical?
Spectroscopy.pptx food analysis technology
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf
The AUB Centre for AI in Media Proposal.docx
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
sap open course for s4hana steps from ECC to s4
Teaching material agriculture food technology

Masonry Code Of Practice Amp

  • 1. Dr. A. Meher Prasad Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras email: prasadam@iitm.ac.in MASONRY CODES OF PRACTICE
  • 2. ACI 530-02 / ASCE 5-02 / TMS 402-02 Minimum requirements for structural design and Construction of masonry unit. Allowable Stress Design (ASD) Limit State Design (LSD) IBC 2000 NZS 4230: Part 1: 1990 Eurocode 6: Design of Masonry Structures IS: 1905 - 1987 Masonry Codes of Practice
  • 3. Design Philosophies Working Stress Method (WSM) Ultimate Load Method (ULM) Limit States Method (LSM)
  • 4. Design Philosophies … “ Limit states design” is supposed to be the most rational design philosophy. Why?
  • 5. Design Philosophies Working stress method ( WSM) - Behaviour under ‘service loads’ - All uncertainties accommodated in ‘factors of safety’ applied to material strengths Ultimate load method (ULM) - Behaviour under ‘ultimate loads’ - All uncertainties accommodated in ‘load factors’ WSM attempts to ensure adequate safety under service loads, while ULM attempts to ensure adequate safety under extreme loads. WSM does not investigate behaviour beyond service loads, ULM does not guarantee serviceability under service loads.
  • 6. WSM and ULM WSM attempts to ensure adequate safety under service loads, while ULM attempts to ensure adequate safety under extreme loads. WSM does not investigate behaviour beyond service loads, ULM does not guarantee serviceability under service loads.
  • 7. Limit States Method (LSM) A limit state is a state of impending failure , beyond which a structure ceases to perform its intended function satisfactorily, in terms of either strength or serviceability ; i.e., it either collapses or becomes unserviceable . Unlike WSM , which bases calculations on service load conditions alone, and unlike ULM , which bases calculations on ultimate load conditions alone, LSM aims for a comprehensive and rational solution to the design problem, by considering safety at ultimate loads and serviceability at working loads . LSM is described as a ‘semi-probabilistic’ method or a ‘Level I reliability’ method
  • 8. Strength Design Model pdf S n R n R and S are independent random variables Probabilistic approach: nominal / characteristic values (deterministic) Moral: There is always a risk of failure. No structure is 100% safe! R  S  Structure will survive! R < S  Structure will fail!
  • 9. F s = R n / S n P f = Prob [ R < S ] Reliability = Probability of survival = 1 - Probability of failure pdf S n R n Deterministic measure of safety: Probabilistic measure of safety: f S ( s ) f R ( r ) = Prob
  • 10.  R k   S k Load and Resistance Design (LRFD) Format Design Resistance  Design Load Effect  S n R n  S n =  R n Load factor > 1 (‘overloading’) Resistance factor < 1 (‘understrength’)  (ULM format)  (WSM format)
  • 11. Partial load and material safety factors Ultimate limit states – partial load factors: UL = 1.5 (DL + LL) UL = 1.5 (DL + QL) or (0.9DL + 1.5 QL) UL = 1.2 (DL + LL + QL) Note : It is not correct to apply 33.3% increase in allowable stress in WSM when only DL and QL are involved! Ultimate limit states – material safety factors : Concrete: = 1.5 Steel: = 1.15
  • 12. Design Philosophies Empirical Design Formulae for the design developed by experience Not a design analysis for sizing and proportioning masonry elements For simple structures still being continued in ACI 530 – 02 and to some extent in IBC 2000 Imposes severe limitation on building height proportions IS 1905 – mixes empirical with allowable stress design
  • 13. Design Philosophies ... Allowable Stress Design All uncertainties are accommodated in Factor of safety applied to material strength Under working loads, the stress developed in a member must be less than the permissible stress For URM, tensile stress in masonry is less than allowable limits and for RM, tensile stress neglected ACI follows this for URM and RM In IS code applies only to URM Does not find place in Eurocode, NZS 4230
  • 14. Design Philosophies . . . Limit State Design Adopted by ACI, IBC 2000 and New Zealand codes Proportion masonry members such that Design strength ≥ Required strength where, Design strength = Nominal strength  φ φ is the strength reduction factor Required strength is computed from design load combinations of building code
  • 15. Eurocode - 6 Limit state design for Collapse and Serviceability Partial safety factors for loads and materials are specified separately instead of strength reduction factor Partial safety factor for loads depends on the load combinations Partial safety factor for materials depends on the type of masonry unit and the failure mode
  • 16. Assumptions in LSD and LRFD Strain continuity between reinforcement, grout and masonry Max Compressive strain ε mu ≈ 0.0035 for clay material ≈ 0.0025 for concrete (CMU) ≈ 0.008 confined masonry ( NZ) Stress in steel, f s = E s ε ≤ f y = f y for ε ≥ ε y ( = f y / E s )
  • 17. Flexural strength is assessed by neglecting tensile strength of masonry But deflections assessed by including tensile strength Masonry stress uniform over hatched block 0.8 f m (ACI) 0.85f m (IBC) Assumptions in LSD and LRFD Equivalent rectangular masonry stress distribution Equivalent rectangular masonry stress distribution for confined masonry according to NZS
  • 18. ACI (f a / F a )  1 f a = Calculated compressive stress F a = Allowable compressive strength = 0.25 f m R Capacity reduction factor for slenderness Accounts for material uncertainties Axial Compression - ASD
  • 19. R = 1 – (h/40t) 2 for h/t ≤ 29 R = (20t/h) 2 for h/t > 29 P ≤ ¼ P e where Slenderness can affect capacity either as a result of inelastic buckling or because of additional bending moment Axial Compression - ASD
  • 20. IS 1905 :1987: a stress reduction factor k s which depends on slenderness ratio and eccentricity of load (Table 9 of Code) Slenderness effects on axial compression Axial Compression - ASD
  • 21. Image is not clear The previous fig is the same….
  • 22. Slenderness ratio for different Eccentricities
  • 23. Reinforced Masonry Axial Compression - ASD ACI 530-02 IBC 2000, NZS:4230: Part 1 , Eurocode 6, IS: 1905-1987 No Provisions have been given
  • 24. Maximum h/t Ratio There is no directly specified limit to the h/t ratio. It is indirectly specified through the check against Euler’s buckling formula ACI 530-02 IS: 1905-1987 Maximum h/t ratio depends on the storey height and type of mortar used. IBC 2000, NZS:4230: Part 1 , Eurocode 6 No Provisions have been given
  • 25. Flexural stress due to eccentricity of axial loading application of horizontal loads such as wind and earthquake loads ACI: A member subjected to pure flexure only Allowable bending compressive stress, F b = 0.33 f m Calculated f b  F b Axial compression with flexure: ASD
  • 26. Interaction formula Very conservative Axial compression with flexure: ASD
  • 27. Axial compression with flexure: ASD Significance of M/Vd v factor
  • 28. IS 1905:1987 Bending compressive and tensile stresses Permissible value for bending compressive stress is increased by 25% and then reducing it for eccentric loading causing flexure. Permissible loads for 3 eccentric values e < t/24 t/24 < e < t/6 e > t/6 Applied moment converted into equivalent eccentricity Axial compression with flexure: ASD
  • 29.  
  • 30. e < t/24 t/24 < e < t/6 e > t/6 Axial compression with flexure: ASD
  • 31. Axial compression with flexure Flexure and Axial Wall Loading Interaction Diagram Reinforced Masonry
  • 32. Design for Shear – ASD ACI 530-02 Shear stress shall not exceed either of 0.125 , 0.83MPa or v+0.45N v /A n IBC 2000, NZS:4230: Part 1 , Eurocode 6 No Provisions have been given IS: 1905-1987 Permissible shear stress is given by: F v = 0.1 + /6 < 0.5MPa Un Reinforced Masonry
  • 33. If shear reinforcement is not provided ACI 530-02 For flexural members, For shear walls, a. M/Vd v < 1, F v = 0.028[4-M/Vd v ] < (0.55-0.31M/Vd v )MPa b. M/Vd v > 1, F v =0.083 < 0.24MPa F v = 0.083 < 0.35MPa, IBC 2000, NZS:4230: Part 1 , Eurocode 6, IS: 1905-1987 No Provisions have been given Design for Shear – ASD Reinforced Masonry
  • 34. ACI 530-02 For flexural members, Fv = 0.25 < 1.03MPa For shear walls, a. M/Vd v < 1, Fv = 0.042[4-M/Vdv] < (0.82-0.031M/Vdv)MPa b. M/Vd v > 1, Fv = 0.125 < 0.52MPa If shear reinforcement is provided Design for Shear – ASD Reinforced Masonry
  • 35. IS: 1905-1987 Permissible shear stress is given by: Fv = 0.1 + /6 < 0.5MPa IBC 2000, NZS:4230: Part 1 , Eurocode 6 No Provisions have been given ASD format If shear reinforcement is provided Design for Shear – ASD Reinforced Masonry
  • 36. IS 1905:1987: Shear Masonry load bearing walls also act as shear walls to resist in plane lateral loads. Shear failure in URM are: (3 modes) Diagonal tension cracks from through mortar and masonry units Design for Shear – ASD
  • 37.  
  • 38. Design for Shear – ASD Sliding occurs along a straight crack of horizontal bed joints While specifying Mohr coulomb type failure criterion Stepped cracks form, alternating from head joint to bed joint depends on bond pattern of masonry
  • 39. IS 1905:1987: takes care of sliding failure by specifying permissible shear stress URM Average axial stress not more than 2.4 MPa
  • 40. Allowable shear for reinforced walls
  • 41.  
  • 42.  
  • 43. Capacity Design for strength of flanged wall
  • 45. LSD
  • 46. AXIAL COMPRESSION - LSD Un Reinforced Masonry: ACI 530-02 IS: 1905-1987, NZS:4230: Part 1 IBC 2000 Eurocode 6 Charactersistic Compressive strength of Masonry is Maximum compressive strain is limited to 0.002 No Provisions are given
  • 47. Reinforced Masonry: ACI 530-02 Eurocode 6, IS: 1905-1987 No Provisions are given AXIAL COMPRESSION - LSD IBC 2000 NZS:4230: Part 1
  • 48. AXIAL COMPRESSION WITH FLEXURE - LSD Un Reinforced Masonry: ACI 530-02, IBC 2000, NZS:4230: Part 1, IS 1905- 1987 No Provisions are given Eurocode 6 1. Design Md equals 2. In case of vertical load, increases to 3. Lateral resistance
  • 49. AXIAL COMPRESSION WITH FLEXURE - LSD Reinforced Masonry: ACI 530-02 2. For walls with factored axial stress < 0.2f m , 1. For walls with factored axial stress < 0.05f m , and SR > 30 shall be designed as above with walls having t min =150mm. 3. at extreme fiber is 0.0035 for clay masonry and 0.002 for concrete masonry.
  • 50. AXIAL COMPRESSION WITH FLEXURE - LSD Reinforced Masonry: IBC 2000 1. For wall design against out-of-plane loads, all values are same as of the ACI code, except 2. is the same as in the ACI code. NZS:4230: Part 1 1. is 0.0025 for unconfined concrete masonry and 0.008 for confined concrete masonry Eurocode 6 For singly reinforced rectangular c/s subjected to bending only IS 1905- 1987 No provisions
  • 51. DESIGN FOR SHEAR - LSD Un Reinforced Masonry: ACI 530-02 Nominal shear strength can be obtained from code section 3.3.4 IBC 2000 Nominal shear strength can be obtained from code section 2108.10.4.1 Eurocode 6 1. F v = 0.1 +0.4 2. V n = F v tl c / IS: 1905-1987, NZS:4230: Part 1 No Provisions
  • 52. DESIGN FOR SHEAR - LSD Reinforced Masonry: ACI 530-02 1. V n = V m + V s 2. When M/Vd v < 0.25, V n < (0.083) 6A n When M/Vd v > 1.00, V n < (0.083) 4A n For M/Vd v value between 0.25 and 1.00, V n may be interpolated IBC 2000 Nominal shear strength is same as in the ACI code. 2. If shear wall failure mode is in flexure, M n shall be at least 1.5M cr for fully grouted wall or 3M cr for partially grouted wall.
  • 53. DESIGN FOR SHEAR - LSD Reinforced Masonry: NZS:4230: Part 1 1. Shear strength is given in section 7.3.2.1 2. Minimum value of A v = 0.15 b w s/f y 3. 4. Required area of shear friction reinforcement is Eurocode 6 1. Ignoring shear reinforcement: 2. Taking shear reinforcement into account: IS: 1905-1987 No Provisions