SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Slide 5- 1
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Chapter 5
The Relational Data Model and
Relational Database Constraints
Slide 5- 3
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Chapter Outline
 Relational Model Concepts
 Relational Model Constraints and Relational
Database Schemas
 Update Operations and Dealing with Constraint
Violations
Slide 5- 4
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Relational Model Concepts
 The relational Model of Data is based on the concept of a
Relation
 The strength of the relational approach to data management
comes from the formal foundation provided by the theory of
relations
 We review the essentials of the formal relational model in
this chapter
 In practice, there is a standard model based on SQL –
this is described in Chapters 8 and 9
 Note: There are several important differences between
the formal model and the practical model, as we shall see
Slide 5- 5
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Relational Model Concepts
 A Relation is a mathematical concept based on
the ideas of sets
 The model was first proposed by Dr. E.F. Codd of
IBM Research in 1970 in the following paper:
 "A Relational Model for Large Shared Data
Banks," Communications of the ACM, June 1970
 The above paper caused a major revolution in the
field of database management and earned Dr.
Codd the coveted ACM Turing Award
Slide 5- 6
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Informal Definitions
 Informally, a relation looks like a table of values.
 A relation typically contains a set of rows.
 The data elements in each row represent certain facts that
correspond to a real-world entity or relationship

In the formal model, rows are called tuples
 Each column has a column header that gives an indication
of the meaning of the data items in that column

In the formal model, the column header is called an attribute
name (or just attribute)
Slide 5- 7
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Example of a Relation
Slide 5- 8
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Informal Definitions
 Key of a Relation:
 Each row has a value of a data item (or set of items)
that uniquely identifies that row in the table

Called the key
 In the STUDENT table, SSN is the key
 Sometimes row-ids or sequential numbers are
assigned as keys to identify the rows in a table

Called artificial key or surrogate key
Slide 5- 9
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Formal Definitions - Schema
 The Schema (or description) of a Relation:
 Denoted by R(A1, A2, .....An)
 R is the name of the relation
 The attributes of the relation are A1, A2, ..., An
 Example:
CUSTOMER (Cust-id, Cust-name, Address, Phone#)
 CUSTOMER is the relation name
 Defined over the four attributes: Cust-id, Cust-name,
Address, Phone#
 Each attribute has a domain or a set of valid values.
 For example, the domain of Cust-id is 6 digit numbers.
Slide 5- 10
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Formal Definitions - Tuple
 A tuple is an ordered set of values (enclosed in angled
brackets ‘< … >’)
 Each value is derived from an appropriate domain.
 A row in the CUSTOMER relation is a 4-tuple and would
consist of four values, for example:
 <632895, "John Smith", "101 Main St. Atlanta, GA 30332",
"(404) 894-2000">
 This is called a 4-tuple as it has 4 values
 A tuple (row) in the CUSTOMER relation.
 A relation is a set of such tuples (rows)
Slide 5- 11
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Formal Definitions - Domain
 A domain has a logical definition:
 Example: “USA_phone_numbers” are the set of 10 digit phone
numbers valid in the U.S.
 A domain also has a data-type or a format defined for it.
 The USA_phone_numbers may have a format: (ddd)ddd-dddd where
each d is a decimal digit.
 Dates have various formats such as year, month, date formatted
as yyyy-mm-dd, or as dd mm,yyyy etc.
 The attribute name designates the role played by a domain in a
relation:
 Used to interpret the meaning of the data elements corresponding
to that attribute
 Example: The domain Date may be used to define two attributes
named “Invoice-date” and “Payment-date” with different meanings
Slide 5- 12
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Formal Definitions - State
 The relation state is a subset of the Cartesian
product of the domains of its attributes
 each domain contains the set of all possible values
the attribute can take.
 Example: attribute Cust-name is defined over the
domain of character strings of maximum length
25
 dom(Cust-name) is varchar(25)
 The role these strings play in the CUSTOMER
relation is that of the name of a customer.
Slide 5- 13
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Formal Definitions - Summary
 Formally,
 Given R(A1, A2, .........., An)
 r(R)  dom (A1) X dom (A2) X ....X dom(An)
 R(A1, A2, …, An) is the schema of the relation
 R is the name of the relation
 A1, A2, …, An are the attributes of the relation
 r(R): a specific state (or "value" or “population”) of
relation R – this is a set of tuples (rows)
 r(R) = {t1, t2, …, tn} where each ti is an n-tuple
 ti = <v1, v2, …, vn> where each vj element-of dom(Aj)
Slide 5- 14
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Formal Definitions - Example
 Let R(A1, A2) be a relation schema:
 Let dom(A1) = {0,1}
 Let dom(A2) = {a,b,c}
 Then: dom(A1) X dom(A2) is all possible combinations:
{<0,a> , <0,b> , <0,c>, <1,a>, <1,b>, <1,c> }
 The relation state r(R)  dom(A1) X dom(A2)
 For example: r(R) could be {<0,a> , <0,b> , <1,c> }
 this is one possible state (or “population” or “extension”) r of
the relation R, defined over A1 and A2.
 It has three 2-tuples: <0,a> , <0,b> , <1,c>
Slide 5- 15
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Definition Summary
Informal Terms Formal Terms
Table Relation
Column Header Attribute
All possible Column
Values
Domain
Row Tuple
Table Definition Schema of a Relation
Populated Table State of the Relation
Slide 5- 16
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Example – A relation STUDENT
Slide 5- 17
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Characteristics Of Relations
 Ordering of tuples in a relation r(R):
 The tuples are not considered to be ordered,
even though they appear to be in the tabular
form.
 Ordering of attributes in a relation schema R (and
of values within each tuple):
 We will consider the attributes in R(A1, A2, ...,
An) and the values in t=<v1, v2, ..., vn> to be
ordered .

(However, a more general alternative definition of
relation does not require this ordering).
Slide 5- 18
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Same state as previous Figure (but
with different order of tuples)
Slide 5- 19
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Characteristics Of Relations
 Values in a tuple:
 All values are considered atomic (indivisible).
 Each value in a tuple must be from the domain of
the attribute for that column

If tuple t = <v1, v2, …, vn> is a tuple (row) in the
relation state r of R(A1, A2, …, An)

Then each vi must be a value from dom(Ai)
 A special null value is used to represent values
that are unknown or inapplicable to certain tuples.
Slide 5- 20
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Characteristics Of Relations
 Notation:
 We refer to component values of a tuple t by:

t[Ai] or t.Ai

This is the value vi of attribute Ai for tuple t
 Similarly, t[Au, Av, ..., Aw] refers to the subtuple of
t containing the values of attributes Au, Av, ..., Aw,
respectively in t
Slide 5- 21
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Relational Integrity Constraints
 Constraints are conditions that must hold on all valid
relation states.
 There are three main types of constraints in the relational
model:
 Key constraints
 Entity integrity constraints
 Referential integrity constraints
 Another implicit constraint is the domain constraint
 Every value in a tuple must be from the domain of its
attribute (or it could be null, if allowed for that attribute)
Slide 5- 22
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Key Constraints
 Superkey of R:
 Is a set of attributes SK of R with the following condition:

No two tuples in any valid relation state r(R) will have the
same value for SK

That is, for any distinct tuples t1 and t2 in r(R), t1[SK]  t2[SK]

This condition must hold in any valid state r(R)
 Key of R:
 A "minimal" superkey
 That is, a key is a superkey K such that removal of any
attribute from K results in a set of attributes that is not a
superkey (does not possess the superkey uniqueness
property)
Slide 5- 23
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Key Constraints (continued)
 Example: Consider the CAR relation schema:
 CAR(State, Reg#, SerialNo, Make, Model, Year)
 CAR has two keys:

Key1 = {State, Reg#}

Key2 = {SerialNo}
 Both are also superkeys of CAR
 {SerialNo, Make} is a superkey but not a key.
 In general:
 Any key is a superkey (but not vice versa)
 Any set of attributes that includes a key is a superkey
 A minimal superkey is also a key
Slide 5- 24
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Key Constraints (continued)
 If a relation has several candidate keys, one is chosen
arbitrarily to be the primary key.

The primary key attributes are underlined.
 Example: Consider the CAR relation schema:

CAR(State, Reg#, SerialNo, Make, Model, Year)

We chose SerialNo as the primary key
 The primary key value is used to uniquely identify each
tuple in a relation
 Provides the tuple identity
 Also used to reference the tuple from another tuple
 General rule: Choose as primary key the smallest of the
candidate keys (in terms of size)
 Not always applicable – choice is sometimes subjective
Slide 5- 25
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
CAR table with two candidate keys –
LicenseNumber chosen as Primary Key
Slide 5- 26
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Relational Database Schema
 Relational Database Schema:
 A set S of relation schemas that belong to the
same database.
 S is the name of the whole database schema
 S = {R1, R2, ..., Rn}
 R1, R2, …, Rn are the names of the individual
relation schemas within the database S
 Following slide shows a COMPANY database
schema with 6 relation schemas
Slide 5- 27
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
COMPANY Database Schema
Slide 5- 28
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Entity Integrity
 Entity Integrity:
 The primary key attributes PK of each relation schema
R in S cannot have null values in any tuple of r(R).

This is because primary key values are used to identify the
individual tuples.

t[PK]  null for any tuple t in r(R)

If PK has several attributes, null is not allowed in any of these
attributes
 Note: Other attributes of R may be constrained to
disallow null values, even though they are not
members of the primary key.
Slide 5- 29
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Referential Integrity
 A constraint involving two relations
 The previous constraints involve a single relation.
 Used to specify a relationship among tuples in
two relations:
 The referencing relation and the referenced
relation.
Slide 5- 30
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Referential Integrity
 Tuples in the referencing relation R1 have
attributes FK (called foreign key attributes) that
reference the primary key attributes PK of the
referenced relation R2.
 A tuple t1 in R1 is said to reference a tuple t2 in
R2 if t1[FK] = t2[PK].
 A referential integrity constraint can be displayed
in a relational database schema as a directed arc
from R1.FK to R2.
Slide 5- 31
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Referential Integrity (or foreign key)
Constraint
 Statement of the constraint
 The value in the foreign key column (or columns)
FK of the the referencing relation R1 can be
either:

(1) a value of an existing primary key value of a
corresponding primary key PK in the referenced
relation R2, or

(2) a null.
 In case (2), the FK in R1 should not be a part of
its own primary key.
Slide 5- 32
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Displaying a relational database
schema and its constraints
 Each relation schema can be displayed as a row of
attribute names
 The name of the relation is written above the attribute
names
 The primary key attribute (or attributes) will be underlined
 A foreign key (referential integrity) constraints is displayed
as a directed arc (arrow) from the foreign key attributes to
the referenced table
 Can also point the the primary key of the referenced relation
for clarity
 Next slide shows the COMPANY relational schema
diagram
Slide 5- 33
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Referential Integrity Constraints for COMPANY database
Slide 5- 34
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Other Types of Constraints
 Semantic Integrity Constraints:
 based on application semantics and cannot be
expressed by the model per se
 Example: “the max. no. of hours per employee for
all projects he or she works on is 56 hrs per week”
 A constraint specification language may have
to be used to express these
 SQL-99 allows triggers and ASSERTIONS to
express for some of these
Slide 5- 35
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Populated database state
 Each relation will have many tuples in its current relation
state
 The relational database state is a union of all the
individual relation states
 Whenever the database is changed, a new state arises
 Basic operations for changing the database:
 INSERT a new tuple in a relation
 DELETE an existing tuple from a relation
 MODIFY an attribute of an existing tuple
 Next slide shows an example state for the COMPANY
database
Slide 5- 36
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Populated database state for COMPANY
Slide 5- 37
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Update Operations on Relations
 INSERT a tuple.
 DELETE a tuple.
 MODIFY a tuple.
 Integrity constraints should not be violated by the
update operations.
 Several update operations may have to be grouped
together.
 Updates may propagate to cause other updates
automatically. This may be necessary to maintain
integrity constraints.
Slide 5- 38
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Update Operations on Relations
 In case of integrity violation, several actions can
be taken:
 Cancel the operation that causes the violation
(RESTRICT or REJECT option)
 Perform the operation but inform the user of the
violation
 Trigger additional updates so the violation is
corrected (CASCADE option, SET NULL option)
 Execute a user-specified error-correction routine
Slide 5- 39
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Possible violations for each operation
 INSERT may violate any of the constraints:
 Domain constraint:

if one of the attribute values provided for the new tuple is not
of the specified attribute domain
 Key constraint:

if the value of a key attribute in the new tuple already exists in
another tuple in the relation
 Referential integrity:

if a foreign key value in the new tuple references a primary
key value that does not exist in the referenced relation
 Entity integrity:

if the primary key value is null in the new tuple
Slide 5- 40
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Possible violations for each operation
 DELETE may violate only referential integrity:
 If the primary key value of the tuple being deleted is
referenced from other tuples in the database

Can be remedied by several actions: RESTRICT, CASCADE,
SET NULL (see Chapter 8 for more details)
 RESTRICT option: reject the deletion
 CASCADE option: propagate the new primary key value into the
foreign keys of the referencing tuples
 SET NULL option: set the foreign keys of the referencing tuples
to NULL
 One of the above options must be specified during database
design for each foreign key constraint
Slide 5- 41
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Possible violations for each operation
 UPDATE may violate domain constraint and NOT NULL
constraint on an attribute being modified
 Any of the other constraints may also be violated,
depending on the attribute being updated:
 Updating the primary key (PK):

Similar to a DELETE followed by an INSERT

Need to specify similar options to DELETE
 Updating a foreign key (FK):

May violate referential integrity
 Updating an ordinary attribute (neither PK nor FK):

Can only violate domain constraints
Slide 5- 42
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Summary
 Presented Relational Model Concepts
 Definitions
 Characteristics of relations
 Discussed Relational Model Constraints and Relational
Database Schemas
 Domain constraints’
 Key constraints
 Entity integrity
 Referential integrity
 Described the Relational Update Operations and Dealing
with Constraint Violations
Slide 5- 43
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
In-Class Exercise
(Taken from Exercise 5.15)
Consider the following relations for a database that keeps track of student
enrollment in courses and the books adopted for each course:
STUDENT(SSN, Name, Major, Bdate)
COURSE(Course#, Cname, Dept)
ENROLL(SSN, Course#, Quarter, Grade)
BOOK_ADOPTION(Course#, Quarter, Book_ISBN)
TEXT(Book_ISBN, Book_Title, Publisher, Author)
Draw a relational schema diagram specifying the foreign keys for this
schema.

More Related Content

PPT
1. UNIT - III.ppt
PPTX
ch04-The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints [Compatibi...
PDF
4 the relational data model and relational database constraints
PPTX
4-therelationaldatamodelandrelationaldatabaseconstraints-140128022150-phpapp0...
PDF
The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints
PPT
Chapter05 database sytem in computer . ppt
PDF
Chapter05 Data Base Chapter05 Data Base .pdf
1. UNIT - III.ppt
ch04-The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints [Compatibi...
4 the relational data model and relational database constraints
4-therelationaldatamodelandrelationaldatabaseconstraints-140128022150-phpapp0...
The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints
Chapter05 database sytem in computer . ppt
Chapter05 Data Base Chapter05 Data Base .pdf

Similar to ndnbfgdfgdfgModel and Relational Database Constraints.ppt (20)

PPT
Chapter05db
PPT
ENCh05.ppt
PDF
DBMS Unit-2.pdf
PPTX
Upload a presentation to download APPLICATIChapter-02 -
PPTX
ch05-The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints.ppt.pptx
PDF
ch05-The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints.pdf
PPTX
relational model.pptx
PDF
Relational Model on Database management PPT
PPT
Chapter 5: Database superclass, subclass
PPTX
Database relational model_unit3_2023 (1).pptx
PPTX
Relational Data Model and Algebra ch2.pptx
PDF
Ch3.pdf
DOCX
The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints Ch5 (Navathe 4t...
PPTX
The relational data model part[1]
PPT
vdocuments.net_copyright-2007-ramez-elmasri-and-shamkant-b-navathe-slide-7-1.ppt
PPT
sql ppt of nitj. Jalandhar proffersor mes shefali
PDF
ch07-Relational Database Design by ER- and EERR-to-Relational Mapping.pdf
PPT
Er & eer to relational mapping
PDF
5 the relational algebra and calculus
Chapter05db
ENCh05.ppt
DBMS Unit-2.pdf
Upload a presentation to download APPLICATIChapter-02 -
ch05-The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints.ppt.pptx
ch05-The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints.pdf
relational model.pptx
Relational Model on Database management PPT
Chapter 5: Database superclass, subclass
Database relational model_unit3_2023 (1).pptx
Relational Data Model and Algebra ch2.pptx
Ch3.pdf
The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints Ch5 (Navathe 4t...
The relational data model part[1]
vdocuments.net_copyright-2007-ramez-elmasri-and-shamkant-b-navathe-slide-7-1.ppt
sql ppt of nitj. Jalandhar proffersor mes shefali
ch07-Relational Database Design by ER- and EERR-to-Relational Mapping.pdf
Er & eer to relational mapping
5 the relational algebra and calculus
Ad

More from WrushabhShirsat3 (20)

PPTX
constructocvbcvbcvbcvbr-Destructor (1).pptx
PPTX
triggersstoredprocedures-190101071259.pptx
PPT
sdfsdfkjsdbusdbiusdhyusdbvyusdgusdbvusdbvyusdv
PPT
SFSDFSdfsdfsdhfhSDIUFBSDIUSDBFIUSHFDJFBSUIDdas
PPTX
hbuyvtyctycrtcfgcfgcijnuinuinunuinuinuinuin
PPT
unit-iipart-1.WDQWDQWDQWDQWDQWDQWDQWDQWDQWDppt
PPT
01_intro.pfwekfmwEKFHswfuhSWFYUGsduyfgSWY6FEWUFpt
PPT
chapter1-convehisudhiusdiudiudsiusdiuddsdshdibsdiubdsjxkjxjntionalsoftwareman...
PPT
chapter7.pptfuifbsdiufbsiudfiudfiufeiufiuf
PPT
m150c1.pptfefgefuygfiuffwefnefjufbwefbweiufwiuefiuefhiuefhwiuefhwuiefhuwiefhwiue
PPTX
xjtrutdctrd5454drxxresersestryugyufy6rythgfytfyt
PPT
jhbuhbhujnhyubhbuybuybuybbuhyybuybuybuybybyubyubybybb
PPT
dcvdhusdbsduvb0sdyvbsdyvbsdvysdvysdbvsydvdbvbyubdvbdvhvhvhvh
PPT
asdabuydvduyawdyuadauysdasuydyudayudayudaw
PPT
lecture1-intro.ppt
PPT
IntroT.ppt
PPTX
scan.pptx
PPTX
PPTX
papp01.pptx
PDF
80410172053.pdf
constructocvbcvbcvbcvbr-Destructor (1).pptx
triggersstoredprocedures-190101071259.pptx
sdfsdfkjsdbusdbiusdhyusdbvyusdgusdbvusdbvyusdv
SFSDFSdfsdfsdhfhSDIUFBSDIUSDBFIUSHFDJFBSUIDdas
hbuyvtyctycrtcfgcfgcijnuinuinunuinuinuinuin
unit-iipart-1.WDQWDQWDQWDQWDQWDQWDQWDQWDQWDppt
01_intro.pfwekfmwEKFHswfuhSWFYUGsduyfgSWY6FEWUFpt
chapter1-convehisudhiusdiudiudsiusdiuddsdshdibsdiubdsjxkjxjntionalsoftwareman...
chapter7.pptfuifbsdiufbsiudfiudfiufeiufiuf
m150c1.pptfefgefuygfiuffwefnefjufbwefbweiufwiuefiuefhiuefhwiuefhwuiefhuwiefhwiue
xjtrutdctrd5454drxxresersestryugyufy6rythgfytfyt
jhbuhbhujnhyubhbuybuybuybbuhyybuybuybuybybyubyubybybb
dcvdhusdbsduvb0sdyvbsdyvbsdvysdvysdbvsydvdbvbyubdvbdvhvhvhvh
asdabuydvduyawdyuadauysdasuydyudayudayudaw
lecture1-intro.ppt
IntroT.ppt
scan.pptx
papp01.pptx
80410172053.pdf
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
HPE Aruba-master-icon-library_052722.pptx
PDF
UNIT 1 Introduction fnfbbfhfhfbdhdbdto Java.pptx.pdf
PPTX
DOC-20250430-WA0014._20250714_235747_0000.pptx
PDF
Quality Control Management for RMG, Level- 4, Certificate
PPTX
Complete Guide to Microsoft PowerPoint 2019 – Features, Tools, and Tips"
PDF
SEVA- Fashion designing-Presentation.pdf
PPTX
Causes of Flooding by Slidesgo sdnl;asnjdl;asj.pptx
PPTX
mahatma gandhi bus terminal in india Case Study.pptx
PDF
The Advantages of Working With a Design-Build Studio
PDF
Urban Design Final Project-Site Analysis
PPT
EGWHermeneuticsffgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg.ppt
PPTX
CLASS_11_BUSINESS_STUDIES_PPT_CHAPTER_1_Business_Trade_Commerce.pptx
PPTX
LITERATURE CASE STUDY DESIGN SEMESTER 5.pptx
PPTX
Entrepreneur intro, origin, process, method
PDF
Chalkpiece Annual Report from 2019 To 2025
PPTX
joggers park landscape assignment bandra
PPTX
Wisp Textiles: Where Comfort Meets Everyday Style
PPTX
BSCS lesson 3.pptxnbbjbb mnbkjbkbbkbbkjb
PDF
YOW2022-BNE-MinimalViableArchitecture.pdf
PPT
pump pump is a mechanism that is used to transfer a liquid from one place to ...
HPE Aruba-master-icon-library_052722.pptx
UNIT 1 Introduction fnfbbfhfhfbdhdbdto Java.pptx.pdf
DOC-20250430-WA0014._20250714_235747_0000.pptx
Quality Control Management for RMG, Level- 4, Certificate
Complete Guide to Microsoft PowerPoint 2019 – Features, Tools, and Tips"
SEVA- Fashion designing-Presentation.pdf
Causes of Flooding by Slidesgo sdnl;asnjdl;asj.pptx
mahatma gandhi bus terminal in india Case Study.pptx
The Advantages of Working With a Design-Build Studio
Urban Design Final Project-Site Analysis
EGWHermeneuticsffgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg.ppt
CLASS_11_BUSINESS_STUDIES_PPT_CHAPTER_1_Business_Trade_Commerce.pptx
LITERATURE CASE STUDY DESIGN SEMESTER 5.pptx
Entrepreneur intro, origin, process, method
Chalkpiece Annual Report from 2019 To 2025
joggers park landscape assignment bandra
Wisp Textiles: Where Comfort Meets Everyday Style
BSCS lesson 3.pptxnbbjbb mnbkjbkbbkbbkjb
YOW2022-BNE-MinimalViableArchitecture.pdf
pump pump is a mechanism that is used to transfer a liquid from one place to ...

ndnbfgdfgdfgModel and Relational Database Constraints.ppt

  • 1. Slide 5- 1 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
  • 2. Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Chapter 5 The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints
  • 3. Slide 5- 3 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Chapter Outline  Relational Model Concepts  Relational Model Constraints and Relational Database Schemas  Update Operations and Dealing with Constraint Violations
  • 4. Slide 5- 4 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Relational Model Concepts  The relational Model of Data is based on the concept of a Relation  The strength of the relational approach to data management comes from the formal foundation provided by the theory of relations  We review the essentials of the formal relational model in this chapter  In practice, there is a standard model based on SQL – this is described in Chapters 8 and 9  Note: There are several important differences between the formal model and the practical model, as we shall see
  • 5. Slide 5- 5 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Relational Model Concepts  A Relation is a mathematical concept based on the ideas of sets  The model was first proposed by Dr. E.F. Codd of IBM Research in 1970 in the following paper:  "A Relational Model for Large Shared Data Banks," Communications of the ACM, June 1970  The above paper caused a major revolution in the field of database management and earned Dr. Codd the coveted ACM Turing Award
  • 6. Slide 5- 6 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Informal Definitions  Informally, a relation looks like a table of values.  A relation typically contains a set of rows.  The data elements in each row represent certain facts that correspond to a real-world entity or relationship  In the formal model, rows are called tuples  Each column has a column header that gives an indication of the meaning of the data items in that column  In the formal model, the column header is called an attribute name (or just attribute)
  • 7. Slide 5- 7 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Example of a Relation
  • 8. Slide 5- 8 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Informal Definitions  Key of a Relation:  Each row has a value of a data item (or set of items) that uniquely identifies that row in the table  Called the key  In the STUDENT table, SSN is the key  Sometimes row-ids or sequential numbers are assigned as keys to identify the rows in a table  Called artificial key or surrogate key
  • 9. Slide 5- 9 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Formal Definitions - Schema  The Schema (or description) of a Relation:  Denoted by R(A1, A2, .....An)  R is the name of the relation  The attributes of the relation are A1, A2, ..., An  Example: CUSTOMER (Cust-id, Cust-name, Address, Phone#)  CUSTOMER is the relation name  Defined over the four attributes: Cust-id, Cust-name, Address, Phone#  Each attribute has a domain or a set of valid values.  For example, the domain of Cust-id is 6 digit numbers.
  • 10. Slide 5- 10 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Formal Definitions - Tuple  A tuple is an ordered set of values (enclosed in angled brackets ‘< … >’)  Each value is derived from an appropriate domain.  A row in the CUSTOMER relation is a 4-tuple and would consist of four values, for example:  <632895, "John Smith", "101 Main St. Atlanta, GA 30332", "(404) 894-2000">  This is called a 4-tuple as it has 4 values  A tuple (row) in the CUSTOMER relation.  A relation is a set of such tuples (rows)
  • 11. Slide 5- 11 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Formal Definitions - Domain  A domain has a logical definition:  Example: “USA_phone_numbers” are the set of 10 digit phone numbers valid in the U.S.  A domain also has a data-type or a format defined for it.  The USA_phone_numbers may have a format: (ddd)ddd-dddd where each d is a decimal digit.  Dates have various formats such as year, month, date formatted as yyyy-mm-dd, or as dd mm,yyyy etc.  The attribute name designates the role played by a domain in a relation:  Used to interpret the meaning of the data elements corresponding to that attribute  Example: The domain Date may be used to define two attributes named “Invoice-date” and “Payment-date” with different meanings
  • 12. Slide 5- 12 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Formal Definitions - State  The relation state is a subset of the Cartesian product of the domains of its attributes  each domain contains the set of all possible values the attribute can take.  Example: attribute Cust-name is defined over the domain of character strings of maximum length 25  dom(Cust-name) is varchar(25)  The role these strings play in the CUSTOMER relation is that of the name of a customer.
  • 13. Slide 5- 13 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Formal Definitions - Summary  Formally,  Given R(A1, A2, .........., An)  r(R)  dom (A1) X dom (A2) X ....X dom(An)  R(A1, A2, …, An) is the schema of the relation  R is the name of the relation  A1, A2, …, An are the attributes of the relation  r(R): a specific state (or "value" or “population”) of relation R – this is a set of tuples (rows)  r(R) = {t1, t2, …, tn} where each ti is an n-tuple  ti = <v1, v2, …, vn> where each vj element-of dom(Aj)
  • 14. Slide 5- 14 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Formal Definitions - Example  Let R(A1, A2) be a relation schema:  Let dom(A1) = {0,1}  Let dom(A2) = {a,b,c}  Then: dom(A1) X dom(A2) is all possible combinations: {<0,a> , <0,b> , <0,c>, <1,a>, <1,b>, <1,c> }  The relation state r(R)  dom(A1) X dom(A2)  For example: r(R) could be {<0,a> , <0,b> , <1,c> }  this is one possible state (or “population” or “extension”) r of the relation R, defined over A1 and A2.  It has three 2-tuples: <0,a> , <0,b> , <1,c>
  • 15. Slide 5- 15 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Definition Summary Informal Terms Formal Terms Table Relation Column Header Attribute All possible Column Values Domain Row Tuple Table Definition Schema of a Relation Populated Table State of the Relation
  • 16. Slide 5- 16 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Example – A relation STUDENT
  • 17. Slide 5- 17 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Characteristics Of Relations  Ordering of tuples in a relation r(R):  The tuples are not considered to be ordered, even though they appear to be in the tabular form.  Ordering of attributes in a relation schema R (and of values within each tuple):  We will consider the attributes in R(A1, A2, ..., An) and the values in t=<v1, v2, ..., vn> to be ordered .  (However, a more general alternative definition of relation does not require this ordering).
  • 18. Slide 5- 18 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Same state as previous Figure (but with different order of tuples)
  • 19. Slide 5- 19 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Characteristics Of Relations  Values in a tuple:  All values are considered atomic (indivisible).  Each value in a tuple must be from the domain of the attribute for that column  If tuple t = <v1, v2, …, vn> is a tuple (row) in the relation state r of R(A1, A2, …, An)  Then each vi must be a value from dom(Ai)  A special null value is used to represent values that are unknown or inapplicable to certain tuples.
  • 20. Slide 5- 20 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Characteristics Of Relations  Notation:  We refer to component values of a tuple t by:  t[Ai] or t.Ai  This is the value vi of attribute Ai for tuple t  Similarly, t[Au, Av, ..., Aw] refers to the subtuple of t containing the values of attributes Au, Av, ..., Aw, respectively in t
  • 21. Slide 5- 21 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Relational Integrity Constraints  Constraints are conditions that must hold on all valid relation states.  There are three main types of constraints in the relational model:  Key constraints  Entity integrity constraints  Referential integrity constraints  Another implicit constraint is the domain constraint  Every value in a tuple must be from the domain of its attribute (or it could be null, if allowed for that attribute)
  • 22. Slide 5- 22 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Key Constraints  Superkey of R:  Is a set of attributes SK of R with the following condition:  No two tuples in any valid relation state r(R) will have the same value for SK  That is, for any distinct tuples t1 and t2 in r(R), t1[SK]  t2[SK]  This condition must hold in any valid state r(R)  Key of R:  A "minimal" superkey  That is, a key is a superkey K such that removal of any attribute from K results in a set of attributes that is not a superkey (does not possess the superkey uniqueness property)
  • 23. Slide 5- 23 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Key Constraints (continued)  Example: Consider the CAR relation schema:  CAR(State, Reg#, SerialNo, Make, Model, Year)  CAR has two keys:  Key1 = {State, Reg#}  Key2 = {SerialNo}  Both are also superkeys of CAR  {SerialNo, Make} is a superkey but not a key.  In general:  Any key is a superkey (but not vice versa)  Any set of attributes that includes a key is a superkey  A minimal superkey is also a key
  • 24. Slide 5- 24 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Key Constraints (continued)  If a relation has several candidate keys, one is chosen arbitrarily to be the primary key.  The primary key attributes are underlined.  Example: Consider the CAR relation schema:  CAR(State, Reg#, SerialNo, Make, Model, Year)  We chose SerialNo as the primary key  The primary key value is used to uniquely identify each tuple in a relation  Provides the tuple identity  Also used to reference the tuple from another tuple  General rule: Choose as primary key the smallest of the candidate keys (in terms of size)  Not always applicable – choice is sometimes subjective
  • 25. Slide 5- 25 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe CAR table with two candidate keys – LicenseNumber chosen as Primary Key
  • 26. Slide 5- 26 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Relational Database Schema  Relational Database Schema:  A set S of relation schemas that belong to the same database.  S is the name of the whole database schema  S = {R1, R2, ..., Rn}  R1, R2, …, Rn are the names of the individual relation schemas within the database S  Following slide shows a COMPANY database schema with 6 relation schemas
  • 27. Slide 5- 27 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe COMPANY Database Schema
  • 28. Slide 5- 28 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Entity Integrity  Entity Integrity:  The primary key attributes PK of each relation schema R in S cannot have null values in any tuple of r(R).  This is because primary key values are used to identify the individual tuples.  t[PK]  null for any tuple t in r(R)  If PK has several attributes, null is not allowed in any of these attributes  Note: Other attributes of R may be constrained to disallow null values, even though they are not members of the primary key.
  • 29. Slide 5- 29 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Referential Integrity  A constraint involving two relations  The previous constraints involve a single relation.  Used to specify a relationship among tuples in two relations:  The referencing relation and the referenced relation.
  • 30. Slide 5- 30 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Referential Integrity  Tuples in the referencing relation R1 have attributes FK (called foreign key attributes) that reference the primary key attributes PK of the referenced relation R2.  A tuple t1 in R1 is said to reference a tuple t2 in R2 if t1[FK] = t2[PK].  A referential integrity constraint can be displayed in a relational database schema as a directed arc from R1.FK to R2.
  • 31. Slide 5- 31 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Referential Integrity (or foreign key) Constraint  Statement of the constraint  The value in the foreign key column (or columns) FK of the the referencing relation R1 can be either:  (1) a value of an existing primary key value of a corresponding primary key PK in the referenced relation R2, or  (2) a null.  In case (2), the FK in R1 should not be a part of its own primary key.
  • 32. Slide 5- 32 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Displaying a relational database schema and its constraints  Each relation schema can be displayed as a row of attribute names  The name of the relation is written above the attribute names  The primary key attribute (or attributes) will be underlined  A foreign key (referential integrity) constraints is displayed as a directed arc (arrow) from the foreign key attributes to the referenced table  Can also point the the primary key of the referenced relation for clarity  Next slide shows the COMPANY relational schema diagram
  • 33. Slide 5- 33 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Referential Integrity Constraints for COMPANY database
  • 34. Slide 5- 34 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Other Types of Constraints  Semantic Integrity Constraints:  based on application semantics and cannot be expressed by the model per se  Example: “the max. no. of hours per employee for all projects he or she works on is 56 hrs per week”  A constraint specification language may have to be used to express these  SQL-99 allows triggers and ASSERTIONS to express for some of these
  • 35. Slide 5- 35 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Populated database state  Each relation will have many tuples in its current relation state  The relational database state is a union of all the individual relation states  Whenever the database is changed, a new state arises  Basic operations for changing the database:  INSERT a new tuple in a relation  DELETE an existing tuple from a relation  MODIFY an attribute of an existing tuple  Next slide shows an example state for the COMPANY database
  • 36. Slide 5- 36 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Populated database state for COMPANY
  • 37. Slide 5- 37 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Update Operations on Relations  INSERT a tuple.  DELETE a tuple.  MODIFY a tuple.  Integrity constraints should not be violated by the update operations.  Several update operations may have to be grouped together.  Updates may propagate to cause other updates automatically. This may be necessary to maintain integrity constraints.
  • 38. Slide 5- 38 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Update Operations on Relations  In case of integrity violation, several actions can be taken:  Cancel the operation that causes the violation (RESTRICT or REJECT option)  Perform the operation but inform the user of the violation  Trigger additional updates so the violation is corrected (CASCADE option, SET NULL option)  Execute a user-specified error-correction routine
  • 39. Slide 5- 39 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Possible violations for each operation  INSERT may violate any of the constraints:  Domain constraint:  if one of the attribute values provided for the new tuple is not of the specified attribute domain  Key constraint:  if the value of a key attribute in the new tuple already exists in another tuple in the relation  Referential integrity:  if a foreign key value in the new tuple references a primary key value that does not exist in the referenced relation  Entity integrity:  if the primary key value is null in the new tuple
  • 40. Slide 5- 40 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Possible violations for each operation  DELETE may violate only referential integrity:  If the primary key value of the tuple being deleted is referenced from other tuples in the database  Can be remedied by several actions: RESTRICT, CASCADE, SET NULL (see Chapter 8 for more details)  RESTRICT option: reject the deletion  CASCADE option: propagate the new primary key value into the foreign keys of the referencing tuples  SET NULL option: set the foreign keys of the referencing tuples to NULL  One of the above options must be specified during database design for each foreign key constraint
  • 41. Slide 5- 41 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Possible violations for each operation  UPDATE may violate domain constraint and NOT NULL constraint on an attribute being modified  Any of the other constraints may also be violated, depending on the attribute being updated:  Updating the primary key (PK):  Similar to a DELETE followed by an INSERT  Need to specify similar options to DELETE  Updating a foreign key (FK):  May violate referential integrity  Updating an ordinary attribute (neither PK nor FK):  Can only violate domain constraints
  • 42. Slide 5- 42 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Summary  Presented Relational Model Concepts  Definitions  Characteristics of relations  Discussed Relational Model Constraints and Relational Database Schemas  Domain constraints’  Key constraints  Entity integrity  Referential integrity  Described the Relational Update Operations and Dealing with Constraint Violations
  • 43. Slide 5- 43 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe In-Class Exercise (Taken from Exercise 5.15) Consider the following relations for a database that keeps track of student enrollment in courses and the books adopted for each course: STUDENT(SSN, Name, Major, Bdate) COURSE(Course#, Cname, Dept) ENROLL(SSN, Course#, Quarter, Grade) BOOK_ADOPTION(Course#, Quarter, Book_ISBN) TEXT(Book_ISBN, Book_Title, Publisher, Author) Draw a relational schema diagram specifying the foreign keys for this schema.