SlideShare a Scribd company logo
New Code Requirements for
Fenestration Energy Performance
FENBC WEBINAR
FEBRUARY 12, 2015
PRESENTED BY AL JAUGELIS
Topics covered
1. Summary of new code requirements
2. Climate Zones
3. Part 3 Buildings
4. Part 9 buildings
5. Fenestration U-values: 2015 – 2020
1. New code requirements for energy
performance of fenestration
Energy related code changes—BCBC
2012 BCBC code changes related to energy efficiency:
 Announced April 2013
 Took effect Dec. 19, 2014 (building permits)
 Changes affect all buildings (Part 3 and Part 9)
Building Code—Part 9 vs. Part 3
Part 9 of Code applies to:
 Buildings up to 3 storeys tall, with building area not
exceeding 600 m2 and used for these major
occupancies:
 Residential occupancies
 Business and personal services occupancies
 Mercantile occupancies
 Medium- and low-hazard industrial occupancies
 “If it’s new, and it’s on the ground, and it ain’t Part 9,
it’s Part 3” (oversimplification)
Energy related code changes—BCBC
 Part 9 changes
 Part 3 changes
Before Dec. 19, 2014 After Dec. 19, 2014
No energy requirements for
fenestration
New Section 9.36:
comprehensive energy
requirements include
fenestration
Before Dec. 19, 2014 After Dec. 19, 2014
ASHRAE 90.1-2007 ASHRAE 90.1-2010
or
2012 National Energy Code
for Buildings
Energy related code changes—VBBL
2014 VBBL code changes related to energy efficiency:
 Part 9 announced April 2014, took effect Jan. 1, 2015
 Part 3 changes took effect Nov. 2013
Energy related code changes—VBBL
 Part 9 changes
 Part 3 changes
Before Jan. 1 2015 After Jan. 1, 2015
No fenestration energy
requirements
One and two family
dwellings, laneway houses:
Subsection 10.2.2
Other Part 9 buildings:
No code requirement,
BCEEA applies
Before Jan. 21, 2014 After Jan. 21, 2014
ASHRAE 90.1-2007 ASHRAE 90.1-2010
or
2011 National Energy Code
for Buildings
 City of Vancouver Part 3 requirements differ from BCBC
 BCEEA only applies where there is no code provision
 BCEEA needs to be updated
 Update expected in 2015
Summary of fenestration energy requirements
2015
Part 9 buildings BCBC New Section 9.36
All Part 9 buildings
Part 9 buildings VBBL New Subsection 10.2.2
One/Two Family Dwellings ONLY
Part 3 buildings BCBC and VBBL ASHRAE 90.1-2010 or
2011 NECB
 City of Vancouver Part 3 requirements differ from BCBC
 BCEEA only applies where there is no code provision
 Needs to be updated
 Update expected in 2015
Summary of fenestration energy requirements
2015
Part 9 buildings BCBC New Section 9.36
All Part 9 buildings
Part 9 buildings VBBL New Subsection 10.2.2
One/Two Family Dwellings ONLY
Part 3 buildings BCBC and VBBL ASHRAE 90.1-2010 or
2011 NECB
2. Climate Zones
BC climate zones
 Energy performance properties are regulated with
respect to Climate Zones
 Climate Zones are based on the Heating-Degree Day
(HDD) values in the Code
 HDD called “Degree-Days Below 18°C” in Code
BC climate zones
 Energy performance properties are regulated with
respect to climate zones—but consult AHJ first!
ASHRAE 90.1 Climate Zones
(SI units)
2011 NECB and BCBC 9.36
Climate Zones (SI units)
BC climate zones
 Energy performance properties are regulated with
respect to climate zones—but consult AHJ first!
ASHRAE 90.1 Climate Zones
(SI units)
2011 NECB and BCBC 9.36
Climate Zones (SI units)
Vancouver is in
ASHRAE 90.1 Zone 5
Vancouver is in
NECB/9.36 Zone 4
3. Fenestration energy
performance
for Part 3 buildings
Fenestration on Part 3 buildings
 ASHRAE 90.1 and NECB are whole building energy
performance standards
 Both have prescriptive, trade-off, and performance
based compliance paths
 Who is responsible for compliance to these standards?
Fenestration on Part 3 buildings
 Suppliers do not comply with ASHRAE 90.1 or NECB—
architects do
 Design team chooses a compliance path for the building
 Determine type and extent of fenestration
 Determine performance requirements (U-value, SHGC)
 Specify products and performance requirements
 Suppliers (manufacturers/contractors) provide products
with specified characteristics
 Suppliers must demonstrate compliance with specified
U-value, SHGC, air leakage requirements
ASHRAE 90.1 compliance paths
All compliance paths require U-values to be determined
using NFRC 100, SHGC using NFRC 200
 Prescriptive Path
 Building Envelope Trade-off Path
 Performance Path
 AAMA methods to determine U-value are not recognized
by ASHRAE 90.1, though they may be accepted by some
consultants
NECB compliance paths
All NECB compliance paths require U-values, SHGC to
be determined using NFRC 100/200 or CSA A440.2
 Prescriptive Path
 Building Envelope Trade-off Path
 Performance Path
Supplier compliance documentation
Q: How do you show compliance with ASHRAE 90.1
U-value/SHGC requirements?
A: "permanent nameplate" or a "signed and dated
certification" by the manufacturer, installer, or supplier
based on
Supplier compliance documentation
Q: How do you show compliance with ASHRAE 90.1
U-value/SHGC requirements?
A: "permanent nameplate" or a "signed and dated
certification" by the manufacturer, installer, or supplier
based on:
 NFRC 100 test sizes
 NFRC 100 & 200 simulations
 NFRC 100 physical testing
Ratings to be "determined by a laboratory accredited by a
nationally recognized accreditation organization, such as
the National Fenestration Rating Council"
Supplier compliance documentation
Q: How do you show compliance with NECB U-value
requirements?
A: No form of documentation specified, but:
 Ratings to be based on NFRC 100 / CSA A440.2 test sizes
and test methods
Supplier compliance documentation
What about spandrels, deflection channels, “actual size
configurations”?
 NFRC 100 and CSA A440.2 do not require actual size
simulations or inclusion of deflection channels,
flashings, and similar thermal bridges
 Some designers believe these must be included, so you
may get requests for that
Supplier compliance documentation
So what is the minimum compliance documentation
you need to submit?
 Whatever is required in the specifications
 Whatever the architect or AHJ will accept
4. Fenestration energy
performance
for Part 9 buildings
City of Vancouver—Subsection 10.2.2.
Maximum fenestration U-values (one and two family
dwellings, laneway homes only):
 Windows and glass doors (sliding, hinged, folding):
1.4 W/m²•°K ( 0.25 Btu/h•ft2•°F )
 Skylights:
2.4 W/m²•°K ( 0.42 Btu/h•ft2•°F )
 “Averaging” of fenestration U-values is permitted to
allow for individual products that exceed maximums
Q: What about other products, such as opaque, partially
glazed or wood doors?
A: Not regulated at this time.
Q: What about “commercial” aluminum products such as
curtain wall?
A: Presumably treated the same as windows.
Q: Is there still a 15% fenestration to floor area limit?
A: No. It has been removed.
City of Vancouver—Subsection 10.2.2.
City of Vancouver—Subsection 10.2.2.
Compliance requirements
 See VBBL Appendix
 Products must be labeled with certified U-values as
required by BCEEA
 Certified Energy Advisers (CEAs) are being trained to
determine compliance with energy performance
requirements, including windows
 Allows P.Eng to average overall U-values at actual sizes
similar to BCEEA “flexibility provision”
 (City has discussed simplified UxA averaging as well,
not clear in Code)
New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance
VBBL Div. B, Appendix A, A-10.2.2.2
 Performance path uses whole building energy modeling
that allows departure from prescriptive requirements
Rest of BC—Section 9.36
9.36 compliance path Part 9 building type
9.36.2 Prescriptive or
Trade-off Paths
Residential occupancy, including houses
Small business, commercial,
low-hazard industrial (<300 m2)
Buildings containing both
9.36.5 Performance Path Houses
Residential buildings with common spaces
2011 NECB Non-residential occupancies (>300m2)
Medium hazard industrial
9.36 prescriptive requirements
Products covered
 Manufactured products
 Windows, doors, skylights, curtain wall, including site-
glazed and site-assembled products
 Prescriptive U-values according to climate zone
 Site-built products
 Site-built products are those to which BCBC 9.7.5 applies:
they are “products outside the scope of NAFS” *
 Site-built products can comply by having the prescriptive
glass required by Table 9.36.2.7.C.
* Based on email correspondence with Building Safety and Standards Branch. Info was
not available on date this was first presented.
Slide Updated on March 10, 2015 based
on new information from BC Building
Safety and Standards Branch
9.36 prescriptive requirements
 Manufactured products: max. U-values based on climate zone
 Exception:
9.36.2.7.(5): One door “separating conditioned from
unconditioned space” may have a U-value up to
2.6 W/m²•°K ( 0.46 Btu/h•ft2•°F )
 Site-built windows and glazed portion of doors
9.36 prescriptive requirements – site-built products
 Site-built windows and glazed portion of doors
9.36 prescriptive requirements – site-built products
 Site-built windows and glazed portion of doors
9.36 prescriptive requirements – site-built products
 Site-built windows and glazed portion of doors
9.36 prescriptive requirements – site-built products
9.36 trade-off path
Fenestration trade-off limitations
 Can only trade window for window, door for door
 Total areas of all traded windows are equal
 Traded windows must have the same orientation
 Sum of areas of all traded windows divided by their
effective thermal resistance ≤ to what they would be if
all windows complied with prescriptive U-values
 Other envelope trade-offs are permitted only when total
fenestration to wall ratio is between 15% and 17% of
above ground gross wall area
Performance path
 The performance path allows greatest design flexibility
and variation from prescriptive requirements
 Requires energy modeling to show that proposed house
is no less energy efficient than a reference house of
same size built to prescriptive requirements
 High performance (low U-value) windows will allow
larger glazed areas, free designers from prescriptive
requirements
Compliance requirements
 No specific compliance requirements identified in code
language circulated for public comment
 Presumably building officials or CEAs will be looking for
BCEEA certified U-value labels
5. Fenestration U-values
summary: 2015 – 2020
Summary of U-values: 2015 – 2020
 From Energy Star to code regulation of fenestration
U-values, there is a lot to grasp
 Helpful to view the prescriptive requirements side by
side, arranged with reference to climate zones
 ASHRAE 90.1 has detailed individual tables for each
climate zone, and for specific building types within each
zone
 ASHRAE 90.1 values in the following tables are for
Residential buildings
New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance
New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance
New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance
New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance
New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance
Zones
7B-8
Zone
C
Zone
2
VBBL
Homes
New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance
New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance
New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance
New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance
Zones
7B-8
Zone
C
Zone
2
VBBL
Homes
 rdhbe.com
Discussion + Questions
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE VISIT

More Related Content

PDF
Energy Consumption in Mid to High-rise Residential Buildings both Before and ...
PDF
Building Enclosures of the Future - Building Tomorrow's Buildings Today
PDF
Deterioration Model for Optimal Mix of TbM v CbM
PDF
Energy and Indoor Air Quality Impacts of DOAS Retrofits in Small Commercial B...
PDF
Deep Energy Retrofit of a High-Rise MURB
PDF
Energy Ratings for Windows: Balancing Energy Consumption and Thermal Comfort
PDF
Masonry Veneer Support Details: Thermal Bridging
PDF
Post Occupancy Research at the North Park Passive House
Energy Consumption in Mid to High-rise Residential Buildings both Before and ...
Building Enclosures of the Future - Building Tomorrow's Buildings Today
Deterioration Model for Optimal Mix of TbM v CbM
Energy and Indoor Air Quality Impacts of DOAS Retrofits in Small Commercial B...
Deep Energy Retrofit of a High-Rise MURB
Energy Ratings for Windows: Balancing Energy Consumption and Thermal Comfort
Masonry Veneer Support Details: Thermal Bridging
Post Occupancy Research at the North Park Passive House

What's hot (20)

PDF
Developing an Open Source Hourly Building Energy Modelling Software Tool
PDF
Re-glazing of an All Glass Tower
PPTX
High-Rise Passive House Feasibility Study
PDF
Net Zero Building Enclosure Retrofits for Houses
PDF
Energy Simulation of High-Rise Residential Buildings: Lessons Learned
PDF
Presentation on Building Enclosure Airtightness Testing in Washington State
PDF
NBEC 2014 - MURB Airtightness Study
PDF
Options for Retrofit Regulations at Time of Renovation
PPTX
AIA Chicago Presentation
PDF
Conventional Roofing Assemblies: Measuring the Thermal Benefits of Light to D...
PDF
NBEC 2014 - High Performance Retrofits
PDF
NBEC 2014 - Balcony Thermal Bridging
PPTX
Building the Future: Net Zero and Net Zero Ready
PDF
Super Insulated Building Enclosures (SEABEC 2013)
PDF
NBEC 2014 - Energy Performance of Windows
PDF
NBEC 2014 - Conventional Roofs: Measuring Impacts of Insulation Strategy and ...
PDF
Energy Efficient Building Enclosure Design Guidelines for Wood-Frame Buildings
PPTX
To Reclad or not to Reclad?
PDF
Energy Consumption in Low-Rise Wood Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings
PDF
The Problems With and Solutions for Ventilated Attics
Developing an Open Source Hourly Building Energy Modelling Software Tool
Re-glazing of an All Glass Tower
High-Rise Passive House Feasibility Study
Net Zero Building Enclosure Retrofits for Houses
Energy Simulation of High-Rise Residential Buildings: Lessons Learned
Presentation on Building Enclosure Airtightness Testing in Washington State
NBEC 2014 - MURB Airtightness Study
Options for Retrofit Regulations at Time of Renovation
AIA Chicago Presentation
Conventional Roofing Assemblies: Measuring the Thermal Benefits of Light to D...
NBEC 2014 - High Performance Retrofits
NBEC 2014 - Balcony Thermal Bridging
Building the Future: Net Zero and Net Zero Ready
Super Insulated Building Enclosures (SEABEC 2013)
NBEC 2014 - Energy Performance of Windows
NBEC 2014 - Conventional Roofs: Measuring Impacts of Insulation Strategy and ...
Energy Efficient Building Enclosure Design Guidelines for Wood-Frame Buildings
To Reclad or not to Reclad?
Energy Consumption in Low-Rise Wood Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings
The Problems With and Solutions for Ventilated Attics
Ad

Viewers also liked (11)

PPTX
Attaching Cladding with Long Screws
PDF
stone cladding
PPTX
PDF
NBEC 2014 - Flow Exponent Values and Implications for Air Leakage Testing
PDF
Carbon Neutral Apartment Retrofits
PPT
Types of Cladding Material For your Home
PDF
Cladding - Intro and types
PPTX
cladding
PPTX
7 Types of Cladding
PDF
American institute of indian studies. Lighting.
PPT
Tensile Fabric Structures
Attaching Cladding with Long Screws
stone cladding
NBEC 2014 - Flow Exponent Values and Implications for Air Leakage Testing
Carbon Neutral Apartment Retrofits
Types of Cladding Material For your Home
Cladding - Intro and types
cladding
7 Types of Cladding
American institute of indian studies. Lighting.
Tensile Fabric Structures
Ad

Similar to New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance (20)

PDF
Adoption and Compliance with Energy Codes: ASHRAE 90.1 and NECB
PPTX
2014 BCBC Envelope Compliance - ASHRAE 90.1 and NECB
PDF
Adoption and Compliance with Energy Codes - ASHRAE 90.1 and NECB
PPTX
2009 IECC: Residential Provisions
PPTX
Adoption and Compliance with Canadian Energy Codes - Lessons from BC
PPT
High performance buildings & rating tools
PDF
National Energy Code for Buildings
PDF
Scott Tallon Walker - nZEB Design Discussion Talk Dec 2017
PDF
Energy Efficient Buildings Codes
PDF
STW Sustainable/ NZEB Design Presentation - Nov 2019
PPTX
From What to How: BCBC Energy Provisions Compliance and Monitoring
PDF
Updating the 2013 Title 24 Building Efficiency Codes
PPTX
Energy efficient for part 9 buildings and city bylaws
PPTX
Energy step code
PPTX
2009 IECC: Commercial
PPTX
IECC 2009 Training
PDF
Overview of U.S. Building Energy Regulations
PPS
Ashrae Sustainability The Road To Net Zero Gcg
PPTX
Tecw students 11 0422
PDF
2008 Updates & Changes Presentation
Adoption and Compliance with Energy Codes: ASHRAE 90.1 and NECB
2014 BCBC Envelope Compliance - ASHRAE 90.1 and NECB
Adoption and Compliance with Energy Codes - ASHRAE 90.1 and NECB
2009 IECC: Residential Provisions
Adoption and Compliance with Canadian Energy Codes - Lessons from BC
High performance buildings & rating tools
National Energy Code for Buildings
Scott Tallon Walker - nZEB Design Discussion Talk Dec 2017
Energy Efficient Buildings Codes
STW Sustainable/ NZEB Design Presentation - Nov 2019
From What to How: BCBC Energy Provisions Compliance and Monitoring
Updating the 2013 Title 24 Building Efficiency Codes
Energy efficient for part 9 buildings and city bylaws
Energy step code
2009 IECC: Commercial
IECC 2009 Training
Overview of U.S. Building Energy Regulations
Ashrae Sustainability The Road To Net Zero Gcg
Tecw students 11 0422
2008 Updates & Changes Presentation

More from RDH Building Science (13)

PPTX
Window Sill Pan Flashings: Are Liquid Membranes Suitable?
PDF
Impact of Heating and Cooling of Expanded Polystyrene and Wool Insulations on...
PDF
Challenges Related to Measuring and Reporting Temperature-Dependent Apparent ...
PDF
Guideline for the Two-Dimensional Simulation of Spandrel Panel Thermal Perfor...
PDF
State of the Art Review of Unvented Sloped Wood-Framed Roofs in Cold Climates
PDF
Solutions to Address Osmosis and the Blistering of Liquid-Applied Waterproofi...
PDF
Passive House Wall Assembly Performance - A Case Study
PDF
Structural Testing of Screws Through Thick Insulation
PDF
Tall Wood Building Enclosures - A Race To the Top
PDF
Moisture Buffering and Ventilation Strategies to Control Indoor Humidity in a...
PDF
Moisture Uptake Testing for CLT Floor Panels in a Tall Wood Building in Vanco...
PDF
Airflow in Mid to High-rise Multi-Unit Residential Buildings
PDF
NBEC 2014 - Airflow in Mid to High-rise Multi-Unit Residential Buildings
Window Sill Pan Flashings: Are Liquid Membranes Suitable?
Impact of Heating and Cooling of Expanded Polystyrene and Wool Insulations on...
Challenges Related to Measuring and Reporting Temperature-Dependent Apparent ...
Guideline for the Two-Dimensional Simulation of Spandrel Panel Thermal Perfor...
State of the Art Review of Unvented Sloped Wood-Framed Roofs in Cold Climates
Solutions to Address Osmosis and the Blistering of Liquid-Applied Waterproofi...
Passive House Wall Assembly Performance - A Case Study
Structural Testing of Screws Through Thick Insulation
Tall Wood Building Enclosures - A Race To the Top
Moisture Buffering and Ventilation Strategies to Control Indoor Humidity in a...
Moisture Uptake Testing for CLT Floor Panels in a Tall Wood Building in Vanco...
Airflow in Mid to High-rise Multi-Unit Residential Buildings
NBEC 2014 - Airflow in Mid to High-rise Multi-Unit Residential Buildings

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Safety Seminar civil to be ensured for safe working.
PPT
INTRODUCTION -Data Warehousing and Mining-M.Tech- VTU.ppt
PDF
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
PDF
Influence of Green Infrastructure on Residents’ Endorsement of the New Ecolog...
PDF
EXPLORING LEARNING ENGAGEMENT FACTORS INFLUENCING BEHAVIORAL, COGNITIVE, AND ...
PPTX
Management Information system : MIS-e-Business Systems.pptx
PPTX
Sorting and Hashing in Data Structures with Algorithms, Techniques, Implement...
PPT
Total quality management ppt for engineering students
PPTX
Module 8- Technological and Communication Skills.pptx
PPTX
Artificial Intelligence
PDF
Accra-Kumasi Expressway - Prefeasibility Report Volume 1 of 7.11.2018.pdf
PDF
BIO-INSPIRED HORMONAL MODULATION AND ADAPTIVE ORCHESTRATION IN S-AI-GPT
PDF
Exploratory_Data_Analysis_Fundamentals.pdf
PDF
22EC502-MICROCONTROLLER AND INTERFACING-8051 MICROCONTROLLER.pdf
PDF
Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance Vision Paper.pdf
PDF
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
PDF
Unit I ESSENTIAL OF DIGITAL MARKETING.pdf
PPTX
CURRICULAM DESIGN engineering FOR CSE 2025.pptx
PDF
Design Guidelines and solutions for Plastics parts
PPTX
Software Engineering and software moduleing
Safety Seminar civil to be ensured for safe working.
INTRODUCTION -Data Warehousing and Mining-M.Tech- VTU.ppt
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
Influence of Green Infrastructure on Residents’ Endorsement of the New Ecolog...
EXPLORING LEARNING ENGAGEMENT FACTORS INFLUENCING BEHAVIORAL, COGNITIVE, AND ...
Management Information system : MIS-e-Business Systems.pptx
Sorting and Hashing in Data Structures with Algorithms, Techniques, Implement...
Total quality management ppt for engineering students
Module 8- Technological and Communication Skills.pptx
Artificial Intelligence
Accra-Kumasi Expressway - Prefeasibility Report Volume 1 of 7.11.2018.pdf
BIO-INSPIRED HORMONAL MODULATION AND ADAPTIVE ORCHESTRATION IN S-AI-GPT
Exploratory_Data_Analysis_Fundamentals.pdf
22EC502-MICROCONTROLLER AND INTERFACING-8051 MICROCONTROLLER.pdf
Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) Alliance Vision Paper.pdf
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
Unit I ESSENTIAL OF DIGITAL MARKETING.pdf
CURRICULAM DESIGN engineering FOR CSE 2025.pptx
Design Guidelines and solutions for Plastics parts
Software Engineering and software moduleing

New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance

  • 1. New Code Requirements for Fenestration Energy Performance FENBC WEBINAR FEBRUARY 12, 2015 PRESENTED BY AL JAUGELIS
  • 2. Topics covered 1. Summary of new code requirements 2. Climate Zones 3. Part 3 Buildings 4. Part 9 buildings 5. Fenestration U-values: 2015 – 2020
  • 3. 1. New code requirements for energy performance of fenestration
  • 4. Energy related code changes—BCBC 2012 BCBC code changes related to energy efficiency:  Announced April 2013  Took effect Dec. 19, 2014 (building permits)  Changes affect all buildings (Part 3 and Part 9)
  • 5. Building Code—Part 9 vs. Part 3 Part 9 of Code applies to:  Buildings up to 3 storeys tall, with building area not exceeding 600 m2 and used for these major occupancies:  Residential occupancies  Business and personal services occupancies  Mercantile occupancies  Medium- and low-hazard industrial occupancies  “If it’s new, and it’s on the ground, and it ain’t Part 9, it’s Part 3” (oversimplification)
  • 6. Energy related code changes—BCBC  Part 9 changes  Part 3 changes Before Dec. 19, 2014 After Dec. 19, 2014 No energy requirements for fenestration New Section 9.36: comprehensive energy requirements include fenestration Before Dec. 19, 2014 After Dec. 19, 2014 ASHRAE 90.1-2007 ASHRAE 90.1-2010 or 2012 National Energy Code for Buildings
  • 7. Energy related code changes—VBBL 2014 VBBL code changes related to energy efficiency:  Part 9 announced April 2014, took effect Jan. 1, 2015  Part 3 changes took effect Nov. 2013
  • 8. Energy related code changes—VBBL  Part 9 changes  Part 3 changes Before Jan. 1 2015 After Jan. 1, 2015 No fenestration energy requirements One and two family dwellings, laneway houses: Subsection 10.2.2 Other Part 9 buildings: No code requirement, BCEEA applies Before Jan. 21, 2014 After Jan. 21, 2014 ASHRAE 90.1-2007 ASHRAE 90.1-2010 or 2011 National Energy Code for Buildings
  • 9.  City of Vancouver Part 3 requirements differ from BCBC  BCEEA only applies where there is no code provision  BCEEA needs to be updated  Update expected in 2015 Summary of fenestration energy requirements 2015 Part 9 buildings BCBC New Section 9.36 All Part 9 buildings Part 9 buildings VBBL New Subsection 10.2.2 One/Two Family Dwellings ONLY Part 3 buildings BCBC and VBBL ASHRAE 90.1-2010 or 2011 NECB
  • 10.  City of Vancouver Part 3 requirements differ from BCBC  BCEEA only applies where there is no code provision  Needs to be updated  Update expected in 2015 Summary of fenestration energy requirements 2015 Part 9 buildings BCBC New Section 9.36 All Part 9 buildings Part 9 buildings VBBL New Subsection 10.2.2 One/Two Family Dwellings ONLY Part 3 buildings BCBC and VBBL ASHRAE 90.1-2010 or 2011 NECB
  • 12. BC climate zones  Energy performance properties are regulated with respect to Climate Zones  Climate Zones are based on the Heating-Degree Day (HDD) values in the Code  HDD called “Degree-Days Below 18°C” in Code
  • 13. BC climate zones  Energy performance properties are regulated with respect to climate zones—but consult AHJ first! ASHRAE 90.1 Climate Zones (SI units) 2011 NECB and BCBC 9.36 Climate Zones (SI units)
  • 14. BC climate zones  Energy performance properties are regulated with respect to climate zones—but consult AHJ first! ASHRAE 90.1 Climate Zones (SI units) 2011 NECB and BCBC 9.36 Climate Zones (SI units) Vancouver is in ASHRAE 90.1 Zone 5 Vancouver is in NECB/9.36 Zone 4
  • 16. Fenestration on Part 3 buildings  ASHRAE 90.1 and NECB are whole building energy performance standards  Both have prescriptive, trade-off, and performance based compliance paths  Who is responsible for compliance to these standards?
  • 17. Fenestration on Part 3 buildings  Suppliers do not comply with ASHRAE 90.1 or NECB— architects do  Design team chooses a compliance path for the building  Determine type and extent of fenestration  Determine performance requirements (U-value, SHGC)  Specify products and performance requirements  Suppliers (manufacturers/contractors) provide products with specified characteristics  Suppliers must demonstrate compliance with specified U-value, SHGC, air leakage requirements
  • 18. ASHRAE 90.1 compliance paths All compliance paths require U-values to be determined using NFRC 100, SHGC using NFRC 200  Prescriptive Path  Building Envelope Trade-off Path  Performance Path  AAMA methods to determine U-value are not recognized by ASHRAE 90.1, though they may be accepted by some consultants
  • 19. NECB compliance paths All NECB compliance paths require U-values, SHGC to be determined using NFRC 100/200 or CSA A440.2  Prescriptive Path  Building Envelope Trade-off Path  Performance Path
  • 20. Supplier compliance documentation Q: How do you show compliance with ASHRAE 90.1 U-value/SHGC requirements? A: "permanent nameplate" or a "signed and dated certification" by the manufacturer, installer, or supplier based on
  • 21. Supplier compliance documentation Q: How do you show compliance with ASHRAE 90.1 U-value/SHGC requirements? A: "permanent nameplate" or a "signed and dated certification" by the manufacturer, installer, or supplier based on:  NFRC 100 test sizes  NFRC 100 & 200 simulations  NFRC 100 physical testing Ratings to be "determined by a laboratory accredited by a nationally recognized accreditation organization, such as the National Fenestration Rating Council"
  • 22. Supplier compliance documentation Q: How do you show compliance with NECB U-value requirements? A: No form of documentation specified, but:  Ratings to be based on NFRC 100 / CSA A440.2 test sizes and test methods
  • 23. Supplier compliance documentation What about spandrels, deflection channels, “actual size configurations”?  NFRC 100 and CSA A440.2 do not require actual size simulations or inclusion of deflection channels, flashings, and similar thermal bridges  Some designers believe these must be included, so you may get requests for that
  • 24. Supplier compliance documentation So what is the minimum compliance documentation you need to submit?  Whatever is required in the specifications  Whatever the architect or AHJ will accept
  • 26. City of Vancouver—Subsection 10.2.2. Maximum fenestration U-values (one and two family dwellings, laneway homes only):  Windows and glass doors (sliding, hinged, folding): 1.4 W/m²•°K ( 0.25 Btu/h•ft2•°F )  Skylights: 2.4 W/m²•°K ( 0.42 Btu/h•ft2•°F )  “Averaging” of fenestration U-values is permitted to allow for individual products that exceed maximums
  • 27. Q: What about other products, such as opaque, partially glazed or wood doors? A: Not regulated at this time. Q: What about “commercial” aluminum products such as curtain wall? A: Presumably treated the same as windows. Q: Is there still a 15% fenestration to floor area limit? A: No. It has been removed. City of Vancouver—Subsection 10.2.2.
  • 28. City of Vancouver—Subsection 10.2.2. Compliance requirements  See VBBL Appendix  Products must be labeled with certified U-values as required by BCEEA  Certified Energy Advisers (CEAs) are being trained to determine compliance with energy performance requirements, including windows  Allows P.Eng to average overall U-values at actual sizes similar to BCEEA “flexibility provision”  (City has discussed simplified UxA averaging as well, not clear in Code)
  • 30. VBBL Div. B, Appendix A, A-10.2.2.2
  • 31.  Performance path uses whole building energy modeling that allows departure from prescriptive requirements Rest of BC—Section 9.36 9.36 compliance path Part 9 building type 9.36.2 Prescriptive or Trade-off Paths Residential occupancy, including houses Small business, commercial, low-hazard industrial (<300 m2) Buildings containing both 9.36.5 Performance Path Houses Residential buildings with common spaces 2011 NECB Non-residential occupancies (>300m2) Medium hazard industrial
  • 32. 9.36 prescriptive requirements Products covered  Manufactured products  Windows, doors, skylights, curtain wall, including site- glazed and site-assembled products  Prescriptive U-values according to climate zone  Site-built products  Site-built products are those to which BCBC 9.7.5 applies: they are “products outside the scope of NAFS” *  Site-built products can comply by having the prescriptive glass required by Table 9.36.2.7.C. * Based on email correspondence with Building Safety and Standards Branch. Info was not available on date this was first presented. Slide Updated on March 10, 2015 based on new information from BC Building Safety and Standards Branch
  • 33. 9.36 prescriptive requirements  Manufactured products: max. U-values based on climate zone  Exception: 9.36.2.7.(5): One door “separating conditioned from unconditioned space” may have a U-value up to 2.6 W/m²•°K ( 0.46 Btu/h•ft2•°F )
  • 34.  Site-built windows and glazed portion of doors 9.36 prescriptive requirements – site-built products
  • 35.  Site-built windows and glazed portion of doors 9.36 prescriptive requirements – site-built products
  • 36.  Site-built windows and glazed portion of doors 9.36 prescriptive requirements – site-built products
  • 37.  Site-built windows and glazed portion of doors 9.36 prescriptive requirements – site-built products
  • 38. 9.36 trade-off path Fenestration trade-off limitations  Can only trade window for window, door for door  Total areas of all traded windows are equal  Traded windows must have the same orientation  Sum of areas of all traded windows divided by their effective thermal resistance ≤ to what they would be if all windows complied with prescriptive U-values  Other envelope trade-offs are permitted only when total fenestration to wall ratio is between 15% and 17% of above ground gross wall area
  • 39. Performance path  The performance path allows greatest design flexibility and variation from prescriptive requirements  Requires energy modeling to show that proposed house is no less energy efficient than a reference house of same size built to prescriptive requirements  High performance (low U-value) windows will allow larger glazed areas, free designers from prescriptive requirements
  • 40. Compliance requirements  No specific compliance requirements identified in code language circulated for public comment  Presumably building officials or CEAs will be looking for BCEEA certified U-value labels
  • 42. Summary of U-values: 2015 – 2020  From Energy Star to code regulation of fenestration U-values, there is a lot to grasp  Helpful to view the prescriptive requirements side by side, arranged with reference to climate zones  ASHRAE 90.1 has detailed individual tables for each climate zone, and for specific building types within each zone  ASHRAE 90.1 values in the following tables are for Residential buildings
  • 54.  rdhbe.com Discussion + Questions FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE VISIT