Niso virtual conf feb17 walsh
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes955 views
The document discusses the commitment to open source projects within academic institutions, emphasizing key considerations such as institutional goals, culture, and available resources. It outlines important aspects for selecting and managing open source software, including governance, project management, and quality assurance. The content aims to guide libraries and organizations in effectively engaging with and supporting open source initiatives.
Niso virtual conf feb17 walsh
- 1. A COMMITMENT TO OPEN Working on Open Source Projects in Academic Environments
- 2. Maureen P. Walsh Institutional Repository Services Librarian The Ohio State University Libraries walsh.260@osu.edu NISO Virtual Conference February 17, 2016
- 5. OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE Repository Discovery Content Management Publishing Exhibits Platforms Frameworks Applications Engines Servers Solutions Technology
- 6. OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE Buy, Build, or Borrow?
- 7. KEY CONSIDERATIONS OPEN SOURCE PROJECTS Bigger Picture On the Ground
- 8. KEY CONSIDERATIONS OPEN SOURCE PROJECTS Institutional Goals Institutional Culture Funding Opportunity Costs Intellectual Property Partnerships Staff Resources Skill Sets Capacity Turn-over Infrastructure Hardware Compatibility Support Bigger Picture On the Ground
- 9. KEY CONSIDERATIONS OPEN SOURCE PROJECTS Institutional Goals Institutional Culture Funding Opportunity Costs Intellectual Property Partnerships Staff Resources Skill Sets Capacity Turn-over Infrastructure Hardware Compatibility Support Bigger Picture On the Ground
- 10. KEY QUESTIONS OPEN SOURCE OPTIONS Community Software
- 11. KEY QUESTIONS OPEN SOURCE OPTIONS Governance model Project management Development activity Quality assurance Documentation and user support Influence and take-up Licensing Service providers Expertise required Standards Interoperability Usability Flexibility Ease of customization Scalability Infrastructure Maintenance Community Software
- 12. KEY QUESTIONS OPEN SOURCE OPTIONS Governance model Project management Development activity Quality assurance Documentation and user support Influence and take-up Licensing Service providers Expertise required Standards Interoperability Usability Flexibility Ease of customization Scalability Infrastructure Maintenance Community Software
- 13. KEY CONSIDERATIONS OPEN SOURCE PROJECT SUPPORT In-House Service Provider Hosted Contributor Member Governance
- 14. MAUREEN P. WALSH Institutional Repository Services Librarian The Ohio State University Libraries walsh.260@osu.edu