Not Just Gifted on Thursdays: Increasing
Differentiation through Collaborative Co-
Teaching
Presentation for the 2015 NAGC Conference
Dr. Liz Fogarty
lizfogarty.weebly.com
fogartye@ecu.edu
2
To DO List :
• Defining: Co-Teaching
• Justification for Co-Teaching
• Integrating the 7 Strategies
• Importance of Co-planning
A Working Relationship
Teacher of the Gifted Regular Ed Teacher
Text LIZFOGARTY751 to 37607 once to
join, then text your message
What is Co-Teaching?
Co-teaching is defined as two or more
teachers working together with groups
of students. They share responsibility for
planning, delivery, and assessment of
instruction, as well as the organization of
the physical space.
 Building better relationships
 Communication/Collaboration
 Co-Teaching/Co-Planning
 Use expertise of clinical teacher
 Best way to meet student needs
 Active vs. Passive
 Attitude
At the Heart of Co-Teaching…
A Short Video on
Co-Teaching
YouTube Video Created by:
Paulina Genovese, Graduate Student
East Carolina University http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq5v
MsA2_Kw
Co-Teaching is
Sharing Responsibility
Students
Co-Teaching Strategies
One Teach, One Observe
One Teach, One Assist
Station Teaching
Parallel Teaching
Supplemental Teaching
Alternative or Differentiated
Teaching
Team Teaching
Short History of Co-Teaching
 PL94-142 (Now IDEA) – Least Restrictive Environment
 SPED and General ED teacher needed to work together
 1995 – Cook and Friend – models of co-teaching
 Kansas State (1999)
 Virginia Consortium (2002)
 St. Cloud State University (2003 – 2010)
 East Carolina University (2011 – 2015)
Benefits to K-12 Students
Focus Groups (N=546)
Increased student engaged time
 Able to work in smaller groups
 Receive more individual attention
 Get questions answered faster
 Get papers and grades back faster
 Students behave better
 Fewer class disruptions (for passing out papers,
having projects checked, other housekeeping tasks)
Copyright 2011, St. Cloud State University,
Research Funded by a US Department of Education, Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant
Working with New Teachers
or Being New Yourself
Three developmental levels of teacher concerns:
1. Survival
2. Task
3. Impact
Frances Fuller (1969)
Survival Stage
The New Teacher
Focus on Self
Asking questions like…
• How am I doing?
• Will the students like me?
• Can I handle discipline
problems?
• Will I make it?
• Do others approve of my
performance?
New Teacher Concerns…
Concerns with Survival
include…
• classroom management
• mastery of content
• supervisor evaluations
• demands and limitations
of teaching
• learning to transfer their
own learning to a
classroom teaching
situation
• not knowing how to
respond to students’ needs
Stress level is high
Survival Stage
Task Stage
The New Teacher
Focus on performance
Asking questions like…
• Am I prepared for the
lesson?
• Have I chosen the right
strategy?
• Is there a better way?
• Will I get finished?
• Will I have time left over?
• How can I improve this?
Coaching
Example questions to ask …
• What did you notice about
how the students
responded to the lesson?
• What do the students need
to know next?
• What assessment method
will you use to determine
the effectiveness of the
lesson?
The Clinical Teacher
Coaching Strategies
• Assist by organizing
materials and providing
planning ideas
• Ask questions to help the
intern move to the next
stage
•Provide time management
suggestions
Keep encouraging them
Task Stage
Impact Stage
The New Teacher
Change in focus…
As confidence in teaching
grows, the intern moves
from a strong focus on
themselves and their
teaching to a focus on
instructional decisions
and student learning.
The Clinical Teacher
Coaching Strategies
• Use reflective questioning
• Peer dialogue
The New Tacher
Asking questions like…
• Are students learning?
• Are the students bored?
• Are the students
motivated?
• Am I reaching everyone?
• Is the content
appropriate for the
students?
• How can I raise
achievement levels?
Impact Stage
1-6 Reading Gains
• Woodcock Johnson III – Research Edition
• Individually administered
• Pre/Post test
• Statistically significant gains in all four years
Woodcock Johnson III
Research Edition
W Score Gains
Co-Taught
Not
Co-Taught
p
2004-2005
15.7
N=221
9.9
N=99
.001
2005-2006
24.4
N=225
18.7
N=124
.024
2006-2007
14.8
N=322
11.8
N=172
.010
2007-2008
19.6
N=245
14.8
N=182
.001
Copyright 2011, St. Cloud State University,
Research Funded by a US Department of Education, Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant
Copyright 2011, St. Cloud State University,
Research Funded by a US Department of Education, Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant
 Woodcock Johnson III – Research Edition
 Individually administered, pre/post test
 Statistically significant gains in 2 of 4 years; positive trend in
each year
1-6 Math Gains
Woodcock Johnson
III Research Edition
W Score Gains
Co-Taught
Not
Co-Taught p
2004-2005
17.2
N=221
13.9
N=99
.039
2005-2006
20.3
N=206
17.4
N=143
.075
2006-2007
14.3
N=313
12.1
N=182
.045
2007-2008
17.9
N=250
16.0
N=177
.089
Co-Teaching is an attitude of sharing
the classroom and the students!
Co-Teachers must always be thinking…
WE’RE
BOTH
TEACHING!!
Implementing Co-Teaching
One Teach,
One Assist
Team Teaching
Station Teaching
Parallel Teaching
One Teach, One Observe
One teacher has primary
instructional responsibility
while the other gathers
specific observational
information on students or
the (instructing) teacher.
One Teach, One Observe
Examples Non-examples
One teaches, one
observes students for
understanding of
directions.
One teaches, one tracks
behavior of specific
student.
One teaches, one watches
the lesson.
One teaches, one cuts out
pictures for the bulletin
board.
Advantages
Provides observation or
data collection
Provides additional
disciplinarian when
needed
One Teach, One Assist
One teacher has
primary instructional
responsibility while the
other assists students’
with their work,
monitors behaviors, or
corrects assignments.
One Teach, One Assist
Examples Non-examples
One teaches, one
becomes the “voice” for
students who are having
difficulty understanding.
One teaches, one drifts
among students checking
student work.
One teaches, one puts up
the bulletin board while
watching the lesson and
students.
One teaches, one pulls
two students to the side
for remedial work.
Advantages
Provides assistance to
students needing
additional information
or clarification
Provides feedback to
students on their work
Provides additional
disciplinarian when
needed
Station Teaching
Each teacher
instructs one of the
groups, groups
then rotate or
spend a designated
amount of time at
each station.
The co-teaching pair
divide the instructional
content into parts.
Station Teaching
Examples Non-examples
One station allows
students to play a money
math game, another is a
mock store where
students purchase items
and make change.
Both teachers are
teaching the same
concept/skill in the same
way with two small
groups.
One teacher works with
class, another tutors two
students.
Advantages
Provides active learning
format
Increases response rate
Encourages cooperation
and independence
Increases small-group
attention
Allows strategic grouping
Parallel Teaching
In this approach, each
teacher instructs half
the students.
The two teachers are
addressing the same
instructional material
using the same teaching
strategies.
Parallel Teaching
Examples Non-examples
Students are divided into
mixed ability groups, both
teachers lead a
question/answer
discussion on a specific
current event and the
impact it has on the
economy.
Students are divided into
two groups, teaching
responsibilities and tasks
are divided between two
teachers.
Students are divided by
ability, both teachers
teach a concept or skill
using different teaching
strategies.
Advantages
Provides effective review
format
Encourages student
responses
Reduces pupil-teacher
ratio for group
instruction/review
Supplemental Teaching
This strategy allows one
teacher to work with
students at their expected
grade level, while the other
teacher works with those
students who need the
information and/or
materials extended or
remediated.
Supplemental Teaching
Examples Non-examples
One works with most of the
students on proofreading their
stories, the other pulls five
students for a remedial lesson
on punctuation.
One teaches a lesson on the
Sit-Ins, the other pulls a group
of three to help research on
the computer the men
involved in the Greensboro Sit-
In and then report to the
whole class.
One teaches a small group a
remedial lesson on fractions,
while the other brings the rest
of the class outside for recess.
One’s person’s ideas prevail
regarding what will be taught
and how it will be taught.
Advantages
Provides additional
support for struggling
students
Facilitates enrichment
opportunities
Offers absent students
“catch up” time
Offers time to develop
missing skills
Keeps individuals and the
class on pace
Alternative or
Differentiated Teaching
Alternative teaching
strategies provide two
different approaches to
teaching the same
information.
The learning outcome is
the same for all students
however the avenue for
getting there is different.
Alternative or
Differentiated Teaching
Examples Non-examples
One leads a group in
predicting prior to reading
by doing a picture walk,
the other has the same
outcome with her group,
where students predict by
connecting items pulled
from a bag with the story.
One teaches fractions by
dividing chocolate bars,
the other has students
using M&Ms to calculate
their fractions.
Both teachers use the
same strategy with two
groups of students
Advantages
Offers more
individualized learning
Different learning styles
can be considered in
planning of activities
Provides possibility for
more hands-on
activities
Team Teaching
Well planned, team taught lessons,
exhibit an invisible flow of instruction
with no prescribed division of authority.
Both teachers are actively involved in
the lesson.
From a student’s
perspective, there is no
clearly defined leader, as
both teachers share the
instruction, are free to
interject information, and
available to assist students
and answer questions.
Team Teaching
Examples Non-examples
Both teachers share the
reading of a story or poem
so students hear two
voices.
Both teachers conduct a
demonstration in science,
modeling proper use of
materials and how to
follow directions.
Both teachers facilitate a
review game where one
reads all of the questions
and the other monitors
student behavior.
One teacher teaches one
subject followed by
another who teaches a
different subject.
Advantages
Promotes role and
content sharing
Facilitates appropriate
academic, social, and
help-seeking behaviors
Teaches question
asking
Provides clarification
(concepts, rules,
vocabulary, etc.)
Physical Arrangements for Co-
Teaching
Co-Planning
During Co-Planning Teachers will Work Together to Determine:
• What content to teach
• What co-teaching strategies to use and when
• Who will lead different parts of the lesson
• How to assess student learning
• The materials and resources needed for the lesson
WHY CO-TEACHING?
Co-teaching provides an excellent experience for
both teachers and p-12 students.
Clinical Teachers
• Time to provide consistent
mentoring of interns
• Host interns without giving up their
classroom
• Able to reach more students through
small group work
• Better relationship with their intern
Students
• Enhanced quality of learning for P-
12 students
• Receive more individual attention
through work in smaller groups
• Get questions answered faster and
work back sooner
• Better behavior/fewer disruptions
Creating an Environment
for Co-Teaching
Sharing Planning
The Gifted Teacher and Regular Teacher
will share:
 What content to teach
 What co-teaching strategies to use
 Who will lead different parts of the lesson
 How to assess student learning
 Materials and resources
Sharing Instruction
While Co-Teaching, the Regular Ed Teacher
and the Gifted Teacher will:
 Share leadership in the classroom
 Work with all students
 Use a variety of co-teaching strategies
 Be seen as equal partners
 Manage the classroom together
 Make changes as needed during a lesson
Sharing Assessment
While Co-Assessing, the Intern, and Clinical
Teacher will:
 Both participate in the assessment of students
 Share the workload of daily grading
 Provide formative and summative assessment for
students
 Jointly determine grades
Dr. Liz Fogarty fogartye@ecu.edu
Questions?

More Related Content

PPT
When Guided Reading Isn't Enough Guidance - Young Talented Readers
PPTX
Co-Teaching with AIG
PPTX
Co teaching 2:1 - Conceptualizing a New Model CAEP 2015 presentation
PDF
Project cooperative learning and peer tutoring in overcoming mathematics an...
PDF
Peer tutoring
PPTX
Co-Teaching: A mutually beneficial school-university partnership for preparin...
PPT
Small Class Size Debate
PPTX
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness in new teachers for nyu
When Guided Reading Isn't Enough Guidance - Young Talented Readers
Co-Teaching with AIG
Co teaching 2:1 - Conceptualizing a New Model CAEP 2015 presentation
Project cooperative learning and peer tutoring in overcoming mathematics an...
Peer tutoring
Co-Teaching: A mutually beneficial school-university partnership for preparin...
Small Class Size Debate
Developing teacher quality and effectiveness in new teachers for nyu

What's hot (20)

PPT
Collaborative assessment
PPT
Effective Teaching in Large Classes
PDF
Co teaching.crosscurrants.2014
PPTX
Response to Intervention
PPTX
The Paradigm Shift: Migrating from Teacher-Centered to Student-Centered Instr...
PPTX
How Co-Teaching Saved Student Teaching
DOCX
Module 4 application action research
PPTX
Final progression and levels
PPTX
Stem in early ed 2014
PPTX
Guiding your child on their career decision making
PDF
Peer tutoring - Online tutoring - Peer learning
PDF
Collaboration.richmond.elem 2013 rt
PPTX
Trends and innovations in teaching large classes
PPT
PPT
Co teaching presentation
PPTX
Problem-Based Learning
PPTX
Classroom Assessment Techniques
PPSX
Teaching large classes
PPTX
Action research final
PDF
Action Research - Assignment 4
Collaborative assessment
Effective Teaching in Large Classes
Co teaching.crosscurrants.2014
Response to Intervention
The Paradigm Shift: Migrating from Teacher-Centered to Student-Centered Instr...
How Co-Teaching Saved Student Teaching
Module 4 application action research
Final progression and levels
Stem in early ed 2014
Guiding your child on their career decision making
Peer tutoring - Online tutoring - Peer learning
Collaboration.richmond.elem 2013 rt
Trends and innovations in teaching large classes
Co teaching presentation
Problem-Based Learning
Classroom Assessment Techniques
Teaching large classes
Action research final
Action Research - Assignment 4
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PDF
Highly Capable Characteristics
PDF
SLC Training 2015
PPT
N U Giftedwhite2
PPT
Doing Differentiation
PPT
Nineteenth World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children
PPTX
What Gifted Students Need by Jeff Danielian
PPT
Don't Fence Me In: Mastery, Creativity and Adventure in the Education of Gif...
PDF
3 Perspectives that Fail Gifted Students
ODP
Motivating Gifted Students and Others: Updated 2/28/16
PPTX
Differentiation
PPTX
Gifted students
PPT
Slacca Myths, Realities, And Coaching 2009[1]
PPTX
Gifted:Surviving and Thriving in the Primary Years Programme
PPT
Overexcitabilitiesgifted
PPT
gifted and talented students
PPTX
Differentiating instruction for Gifted Learners
PPT
Gifted presentation 10 11
PPTX
Understanding the Unique Needs of Gifted Students
PPTX
Teacher perceptions of giftedness ppt
Highly Capable Characteristics
SLC Training 2015
N U Giftedwhite2
Doing Differentiation
Nineteenth World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children
What Gifted Students Need by Jeff Danielian
Don't Fence Me In: Mastery, Creativity and Adventure in the Education of Gif...
3 Perspectives that Fail Gifted Students
Motivating Gifted Students and Others: Updated 2/28/16
Differentiation
Gifted students
Slacca Myths, Realities, And Coaching 2009[1]
Gifted:Surviving and Thriving in the Primary Years Programme
Overexcitabilitiesgifted
gifted and talented students
Differentiating instruction for Gifted Learners
Gifted presentation 10 11
Understanding the Unique Needs of Gifted Students
Teacher perceptions of giftedness ppt
Ad

Similar to Not Just Gifted on Thursdays: Increasing Differentiation through Collaborative Co-Teaching (20)

PPT
Helping Student Teachers Through Co-Teaching Programs
DOCX
Coteaching by basudeba das
DOCX
Facilitating student learning coteaching ela
PPT
Justmeans power point
PPT
Justmeans power point
PPT
Justmeans power point
PPT
Justmeans power point
PPT
Justmeans power point
PPT
Justmeans power point
PPT
Justmeans power point
PPTX
Coteaching model1 nolan_eng
PDF
CR4YR collaboration.Aug 2013, Oct Prince Rupert
PPT
Principles of effective collaboration mm
PPT
6 methods for collaborative team teaching kyla rice
PPT
A Guide To Co Teaching
PPT
Coteaching by K. Shelp
PPT
Coteaching
PPTX
Module one presentation
PPTX
Module one presentation (1)
PDF
LIF - Inclusion - Middle Schools, Coquitlam. Oct 2014
Helping Student Teachers Through Co-Teaching Programs
Coteaching by basudeba das
Facilitating student learning coteaching ela
Justmeans power point
Justmeans power point
Justmeans power point
Justmeans power point
Justmeans power point
Justmeans power point
Justmeans power point
Coteaching model1 nolan_eng
CR4YR collaboration.Aug 2013, Oct Prince Rupert
Principles of effective collaboration mm
6 methods for collaborative team teaching kyla rice
A Guide To Co Teaching
Coteaching by K. Shelp
Coteaching
Module one presentation
Module one presentation (1)
LIF - Inclusion - Middle Schools, Coquitlam. Oct 2014

More from Liz Fogarty (20)

PPTX
Day 4 Critical Literacy for Edufest
PPTX
Day 3 Critical Literacy at Edufest 2019
PPTX
Critical Literacy for 2019 MCRR Conference
PPTX
When Guided Reading Isn't Enough Guidance
PPTX
Day 2 Talented Readers at Edufest
PPTX
Day 2 Critical Literacy for Edufest
PPTX
Day 1 Critical Literacy for Edufest
PDF
Co-Instruction Handout
PDF
Co-Planning Strategies Handout
PDF
TPRE Call for Articles for Special Issue on Co-Teaching
PDF
Co-Teaching Rubric
PPTX
Reading Buddies: A Mutually Beneficial Partnership
PDF
Dr. Dillon's Motivation presentation 2019
PPTX
Guiding Innovations in Clinical Practice by Investigating Motivation in Co-Te...
PPTX
Curriculum Compacting
PPT
Best Practices in Reading Instruction for Talented Readers
PPTX
Nagc Hothousing 2015
PDF
2015 Lagniappe Tiered Assignments
PDF
Teachingthe giftedchildgallagherrobinsoncourtrightcoltrane
PPTX
The Co-Teaching Model of Student Teaching: New Directions in Teacher Prepar...
Day 4 Critical Literacy for Edufest
Day 3 Critical Literacy at Edufest 2019
Critical Literacy for 2019 MCRR Conference
When Guided Reading Isn't Enough Guidance
Day 2 Talented Readers at Edufest
Day 2 Critical Literacy for Edufest
Day 1 Critical Literacy for Edufest
Co-Instruction Handout
Co-Planning Strategies Handout
TPRE Call for Articles for Special Issue on Co-Teaching
Co-Teaching Rubric
Reading Buddies: A Mutually Beneficial Partnership
Dr. Dillon's Motivation presentation 2019
Guiding Innovations in Clinical Practice by Investigating Motivation in Co-Te...
Curriculum Compacting
Best Practices in Reading Instruction for Talented Readers
Nagc Hothousing 2015
2015 Lagniappe Tiered Assignments
Teachingthe giftedchildgallagherrobinsoncourtrightcoltrane
The Co-Teaching Model of Student Teaching: New Directions in Teacher Prepar...

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Uderstanding digital marketing and marketing stratergie for engaging the digi...
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PPTX
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
PPTX
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
PDF
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
Uderstanding digital marketing and marketing stratergie for engaging the digi...
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
advance database management system book.pdf
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf

Not Just Gifted on Thursdays: Increasing Differentiation through Collaborative Co-Teaching

  • 1. Not Just Gifted on Thursdays: Increasing Differentiation through Collaborative Co- Teaching Presentation for the 2015 NAGC Conference Dr. Liz Fogarty lizfogarty.weebly.com fogartye@ecu.edu
  • 2. 2 To DO List : • Defining: Co-Teaching • Justification for Co-Teaching • Integrating the 7 Strategies • Importance of Co-planning
  • 3. A Working Relationship Teacher of the Gifted Regular Ed Teacher
  • 4. Text LIZFOGARTY751 to 37607 once to join, then text your message
  • 5. What is Co-Teaching? Co-teaching is defined as two or more teachers working together with groups of students. They share responsibility for planning, delivery, and assessment of instruction, as well as the organization of the physical space.
  • 6.  Building better relationships  Communication/Collaboration  Co-Teaching/Co-Planning  Use expertise of clinical teacher  Best way to meet student needs  Active vs. Passive  Attitude At the Heart of Co-Teaching…
  • 7. A Short Video on Co-Teaching YouTube Video Created by: Paulina Genovese, Graduate Student East Carolina University http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq5v MsA2_Kw
  • 9. Co-Teaching Strategies One Teach, One Observe One Teach, One Assist Station Teaching Parallel Teaching Supplemental Teaching Alternative or Differentiated Teaching Team Teaching
  • 10. Short History of Co-Teaching  PL94-142 (Now IDEA) – Least Restrictive Environment  SPED and General ED teacher needed to work together  1995 – Cook and Friend – models of co-teaching  Kansas State (1999)  Virginia Consortium (2002)  St. Cloud State University (2003 – 2010)  East Carolina University (2011 – 2015)
  • 11. Benefits to K-12 Students Focus Groups (N=546) Increased student engaged time  Able to work in smaller groups  Receive more individual attention  Get questions answered faster  Get papers and grades back faster  Students behave better  Fewer class disruptions (for passing out papers, having projects checked, other housekeeping tasks) Copyright 2011, St. Cloud State University, Research Funded by a US Department of Education, Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant
  • 12. Working with New Teachers or Being New Yourself Three developmental levels of teacher concerns: 1. Survival 2. Task 3. Impact Frances Fuller (1969)
  • 13. Survival Stage The New Teacher Focus on Self Asking questions like… • How am I doing? • Will the students like me? • Can I handle discipline problems? • Will I make it? • Do others approve of my performance? New Teacher Concerns… Concerns with Survival include… • classroom management • mastery of content • supervisor evaluations • demands and limitations of teaching • learning to transfer their own learning to a classroom teaching situation • not knowing how to respond to students’ needs Stress level is high
  • 15. Task Stage The New Teacher Focus on performance Asking questions like… • Am I prepared for the lesson? • Have I chosen the right strategy? • Is there a better way? • Will I get finished? • Will I have time left over? • How can I improve this? Coaching Example questions to ask … • What did you notice about how the students responded to the lesson? • What do the students need to know next? • What assessment method will you use to determine the effectiveness of the lesson? The Clinical Teacher Coaching Strategies • Assist by organizing materials and providing planning ideas • Ask questions to help the intern move to the next stage •Provide time management suggestions Keep encouraging them
  • 17. Impact Stage The New Teacher Change in focus… As confidence in teaching grows, the intern moves from a strong focus on themselves and their teaching to a focus on instructional decisions and student learning. The Clinical Teacher Coaching Strategies • Use reflective questioning • Peer dialogue The New Tacher Asking questions like… • Are students learning? • Are the students bored? • Are the students motivated? • Am I reaching everyone? • Is the content appropriate for the students? • How can I raise achievement levels?
  • 19. 1-6 Reading Gains • Woodcock Johnson III – Research Edition • Individually administered • Pre/Post test • Statistically significant gains in all four years Woodcock Johnson III Research Edition W Score Gains Co-Taught Not Co-Taught p 2004-2005 15.7 N=221 9.9 N=99 .001 2005-2006 24.4 N=225 18.7 N=124 .024 2006-2007 14.8 N=322 11.8 N=172 .010 2007-2008 19.6 N=245 14.8 N=182 .001 Copyright 2011, St. Cloud State University, Research Funded by a US Department of Education, Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant
  • 20. Copyright 2011, St. Cloud State University, Research Funded by a US Department of Education, Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant  Woodcock Johnson III – Research Edition  Individually administered, pre/post test  Statistically significant gains in 2 of 4 years; positive trend in each year 1-6 Math Gains Woodcock Johnson III Research Edition W Score Gains Co-Taught Not Co-Taught p 2004-2005 17.2 N=221 13.9 N=99 .039 2005-2006 20.3 N=206 17.4 N=143 .075 2006-2007 14.3 N=313 12.1 N=182 .045 2007-2008 17.9 N=250 16.0 N=177 .089
  • 21. Co-Teaching is an attitude of sharing the classroom and the students! Co-Teachers must always be thinking… WE’RE BOTH TEACHING!!
  • 22. Implementing Co-Teaching One Teach, One Assist Team Teaching Station Teaching Parallel Teaching
  • 23. One Teach, One Observe One teacher has primary instructional responsibility while the other gathers specific observational information on students or the (instructing) teacher.
  • 24. One Teach, One Observe Examples Non-examples One teaches, one observes students for understanding of directions. One teaches, one tracks behavior of specific student. One teaches, one watches the lesson. One teaches, one cuts out pictures for the bulletin board. Advantages Provides observation or data collection Provides additional disciplinarian when needed
  • 25. One Teach, One Assist One teacher has primary instructional responsibility while the other assists students’ with their work, monitors behaviors, or corrects assignments.
  • 26. One Teach, One Assist Examples Non-examples One teaches, one becomes the “voice” for students who are having difficulty understanding. One teaches, one drifts among students checking student work. One teaches, one puts up the bulletin board while watching the lesson and students. One teaches, one pulls two students to the side for remedial work. Advantages Provides assistance to students needing additional information or clarification Provides feedback to students on their work Provides additional disciplinarian when needed
  • 27. Station Teaching Each teacher instructs one of the groups, groups then rotate or spend a designated amount of time at each station. The co-teaching pair divide the instructional content into parts.
  • 28. Station Teaching Examples Non-examples One station allows students to play a money math game, another is a mock store where students purchase items and make change. Both teachers are teaching the same concept/skill in the same way with two small groups. One teacher works with class, another tutors two students. Advantages Provides active learning format Increases response rate Encourages cooperation and independence Increases small-group attention Allows strategic grouping
  • 29. Parallel Teaching In this approach, each teacher instructs half the students. The two teachers are addressing the same instructional material using the same teaching strategies.
  • 30. Parallel Teaching Examples Non-examples Students are divided into mixed ability groups, both teachers lead a question/answer discussion on a specific current event and the impact it has on the economy. Students are divided into two groups, teaching responsibilities and tasks are divided between two teachers. Students are divided by ability, both teachers teach a concept or skill using different teaching strategies. Advantages Provides effective review format Encourages student responses Reduces pupil-teacher ratio for group instruction/review
  • 31. Supplemental Teaching This strategy allows one teacher to work with students at their expected grade level, while the other teacher works with those students who need the information and/or materials extended or remediated.
  • 32. Supplemental Teaching Examples Non-examples One works with most of the students on proofreading their stories, the other pulls five students for a remedial lesson on punctuation. One teaches a lesson on the Sit-Ins, the other pulls a group of three to help research on the computer the men involved in the Greensboro Sit- In and then report to the whole class. One teaches a small group a remedial lesson on fractions, while the other brings the rest of the class outside for recess. One’s person’s ideas prevail regarding what will be taught and how it will be taught. Advantages Provides additional support for struggling students Facilitates enrichment opportunities Offers absent students “catch up” time Offers time to develop missing skills Keeps individuals and the class on pace
  • 33. Alternative or Differentiated Teaching Alternative teaching strategies provide two different approaches to teaching the same information. The learning outcome is the same for all students however the avenue for getting there is different.
  • 34. Alternative or Differentiated Teaching Examples Non-examples One leads a group in predicting prior to reading by doing a picture walk, the other has the same outcome with her group, where students predict by connecting items pulled from a bag with the story. One teaches fractions by dividing chocolate bars, the other has students using M&Ms to calculate their fractions. Both teachers use the same strategy with two groups of students Advantages Offers more individualized learning Different learning styles can be considered in planning of activities Provides possibility for more hands-on activities
  • 35. Team Teaching Well planned, team taught lessons, exhibit an invisible flow of instruction with no prescribed division of authority. Both teachers are actively involved in the lesson. From a student’s perspective, there is no clearly defined leader, as both teachers share the instruction, are free to interject information, and available to assist students and answer questions.
  • 36. Team Teaching Examples Non-examples Both teachers share the reading of a story or poem so students hear two voices. Both teachers conduct a demonstration in science, modeling proper use of materials and how to follow directions. Both teachers facilitate a review game where one reads all of the questions and the other monitors student behavior. One teacher teaches one subject followed by another who teaches a different subject. Advantages Promotes role and content sharing Facilitates appropriate academic, social, and help-seeking behaviors Teaches question asking Provides clarification (concepts, rules, vocabulary, etc.)
  • 38. Co-Planning During Co-Planning Teachers will Work Together to Determine: • What content to teach • What co-teaching strategies to use and when • Who will lead different parts of the lesson • How to assess student learning • The materials and resources needed for the lesson
  • 39. WHY CO-TEACHING? Co-teaching provides an excellent experience for both teachers and p-12 students. Clinical Teachers • Time to provide consistent mentoring of interns • Host interns without giving up their classroom • Able to reach more students through small group work • Better relationship with their intern Students • Enhanced quality of learning for P- 12 students • Receive more individual attention through work in smaller groups • Get questions answered faster and work back sooner • Better behavior/fewer disruptions
  • 41. Sharing Planning The Gifted Teacher and Regular Teacher will share:  What content to teach  What co-teaching strategies to use  Who will lead different parts of the lesson  How to assess student learning  Materials and resources
  • 42. Sharing Instruction While Co-Teaching, the Regular Ed Teacher and the Gifted Teacher will:  Share leadership in the classroom  Work with all students  Use a variety of co-teaching strategies  Be seen as equal partners  Manage the classroom together  Make changes as needed during a lesson
  • 43. Sharing Assessment While Co-Assessing, the Intern, and Clinical Teacher will:  Both participate in the assessment of students  Share the workload of daily grading  Provide formative and summative assessment for students  Jointly determine grades
  • 44. Dr. Liz Fogarty fogartye@ecu.edu Questions?

Editor's Notes

  • #2: Introductions - quick