SlideShare a Scribd company logo
2
Most read
13
Most read
21
Most read
Operations Management : Line Balancing
 Line balancing is the procedure in which tasks along task the assembly line are assigned to work
station so each has approximately same amount of work.
 A workstation within an assembly line in order to meet the required production rate and to achieve
a minimum amount of idle time.
BALANCED LINE
 Promotes one piece flow
 Avoids excessive work load in some stages
(overburden)
 Minimizes wastes (over-processing, inventory,
waiting, rework, transportation, motion)
 Reduces variation
 Increased Efficiency
 Minimizes Idle time
UNBALANCED LINE
 High work load in some stages (Overburden)
 Maximizes wastes (over-processing, inventory,
waiting, rework, transportation, motion)
 High variation in output
 Restrict one piece flow
 Maximizes Idle time
 Poor efficiency
 TASK PRECEDENCE:The sequence in which tasks are performed.
 CYCLETIME:The time expressed in minutes between two simultaneous products coming off
the end of a production line.
 PRODUCTIVETIME PER HOUR:The average number of minutes a workstation is working in
an hour.
 WORKSTATION:A physical area where a worker with tools/ one or more machines, or an
unattended machines like a robot performs a particular set of task in a production line.
 WORK CENTER:A small group of identical workstations, where each workstation performs the
same set of task.
 NUMBER OF WORKSTATIONSWORKING:The amount of work done at a work centre
expressed in number of workstations.
 MINIMUM NUMBER OF WORKSTATIONS:The least number of workstation that provides the
required production.
 ACTUAL NUMBER OF WORKSTATIONS:This is the total number of workstations required on
the entire production line. It is calculated as the next higher integer of the number of
workstations working.
 UTILIZATION:The percentage of time a production line is working.
Example of Assembly-Line Balancing
Problem: An Assembly consists of the following elements as given in table below.
The production rate required is one assembly every 15 minute. Determine the
minimum no of workstations required so as to minimize the Balance- Delay. Find
Balance Delay Station-wise.
STEP 1. List the sequential relationships among tasks and then draw a precedence diagram
Task A B C D E F G H I J K L
Immediate
Predecessor
Nil A B B B B C,D G E I,F H,J K
Task Time 12 6 6 2 2 12 7 5 1 4 6 7
7 min.
12 min.
12 min
F
6 min
C
6 min
B
2 min
D
6 min
Incremental Utilisation (IU) Heuristic
A heuristic method is a procedure that can find a good feasible solution
for a given class of problems, but which is not necessarily an optimal
solution.
❖ It add tasks to a workstation in a precedence task order.
❖ To each task added to the station, operators are added when necessary, and the station
utilization is calculated by equation.
❖ Tasks are added at the used station until its utilization is 100%, or until a reduction
occurs, considering the new task and another operator when necessary.
❖ Then, a new station is considered, and the procedure is repeated on the next
workstation for the remaining tasks.
The incremental utilization heuristic is appropriate when one or
more task times is equal to or greater than the cycle time. An
important advantage of this heuristic is that it is capable of
solving line-balancing problems regardless of the length of task
times relative to the cycle time.
Operations Management : Line Balancing
Example
The back room operations of a fast food restaurant have these tasks:
If 100 burgers per hour must be prepared by the crew and 50 minutes per
hour must be prepared by the crew and 50 minutes per hour are
productive:
a.Draw a diagram of the precedence relationships.
b. Compute the cycle time per burger in minutes.
c. Compute the minimum number of workstations required.
d. How would you combine tasks into workstations to minimize idle time?
Use the incremental utilization heuristic. Evaluate your proposal.
Solution
a) Compute the cycle time per burger:
Cycle time = Productive time/ hour
Demand/ hour
= 50 minutes/hour
100 burgers/ hour
= 0.50 minute/burger
b) Compute the minimum number of workstations:
Minimum no. = Sum of task times x Demand/hour
of workstations Productive time/hour
= 5.07 minutes/burger x 100 burgers/hour
50 minutes/hour
= 0.14 workstations
Operations Management : Line Balancing
Operations Management : Line Balancing
d) Evaluation of the proposal:
Utilization= Minimum number of workstations
Actual number of workstations
= 10.14
43
= 0.2358 or 23.58 %
Longest-Task-Time
Heuristic
STEP 2. . Calculate the required workstation cycle time
CYCLE TIME = (PRODUCTION TIME PER DAY) /(OUTPUT PER DAY) = 15 minutes
STEP 3. Calculate the theoretical minimum number of workstations.
NUMBER OF WORK STATIONS = ( SUM OF TOTAL TASK TIMES) / (CYCLE TIME)
= 70 min’s / 15 min’s
= 4.67 ≈ 5 (rounded)
STEP 4. Choose a primary rule that will determine how
tasks are to be assigned to workstations
 For this example, our primary rule is to prioritize
tasks based on the largest number of following tasks.
 If there is a tie, our secondary rule is to prioritize
tasks in the order of the longest task time.
 In general, select rules that prioritize tasks
according to the largest number of followers or based on
length of time.
STEP 5. Beginning with the first workstation, assign each task, one at a time, until the sum of
the task times is equal to the workstation cycle time or until no other tasks can be assigned
due to sequence or time restrictions.
Task
Number of
Following Tasks
A 11
B 10
C or D or E 4
I,F or G 3
H or J 2
K 1
L 0
Stations Task TaskTime
(in minutes)
Number of
Following
Tasks
Remaining
Unassigned
Time
(Balance-Delay)
Feasible
Remaining
Tasks
Task with
Most
Followers
Task with
Longest
Operating
Time
Station 1 A 12 11 3 IDLE None
Station 2 B
C
D
6
6
2
10
4
4
9
3
1 IDLE
C,D,E
D,E
None
C,D,E
D,E
C
D ,E
Station 3 E
F
I
2
12
1
4
3
3
13
1
0 IDLE
F,I, G
I
None
F,I,G F
Station 4 G
H
7
5
3
2
8
3 IDLE
H, J
None
H, J H
Station 5 J
K
4
6
2
1
11
5 IDLE
K
None
Station 6 L 7 0 8 IDLE None
STEP 7. Evaluate the efficiency of the line balance.
EFFICIENCY = (SUM OF ALL TASK TIMES)/(ACTUAL NO OF
WORKSTATIONS)X(CYCLE TIME)
= (70) / (6) X (15)
= 0.778 OR 77. 78 %
 Cars for the masses
 Cost $850
 Built new plant at Highland Park, Michigan
 Ford consulted FrederickTaylor, Creator of Scientific Management
 Installation of Gravity Slides
 December 1, 1913, the first large scale assembly line was officially launched
Assembly Line- The Ford Way
 Cars 84 Steps in the assembly line
 Interchangeable parts
 Less waste and higher quality product
 Production time dropped from over 12 hours to just 93 mins
 Produced 3,08,612 cars in 1914
 Cost of ModelT dropped to $260 in 1924
 Work time was reduced from 9 to 8 hours and wages doubled to $5 a day
Assembly Line- The Ford Way
Apparel Industry
With proper implementation of line balancing it was seen that the efficiency was further
increased.
•Technical Benefits
•Economic Benefits
 Production lines were designed so that conveyor belts paced the
speed of the employees work.This arrangement wasn't
appreciated by the employees.
 Inevitable changes lead to production lines being out of balance.
 Rebalancing causes disruptions to production
THANKYOU!

More Related Content

PPTX
Line balancing
PPTX
Line balancing and heuristics
PPTX
Line balancing
PPTX
statistical process control
PPT
PPT
Line balancing and its formulation
PPTX
Assembly line balancing
PDF
Project Charter Guide
Line balancing
Line balancing and heuristics
Line balancing
statistical process control
Line balancing and its formulation
Assembly line balancing
Project Charter Guide

What's hot (20)

PPT
79971255 assembly-line-balancing
PPTX
Assembly line balancing
DOCX
Assembly Line Balancing -Example
PPTX
assembly line balancing
PPTX
Line balancing
PPT
Work Study- Methods Study
PPTX
cycle time, normal time and standard allowance
PPT
CAPACITY PLANNING
PPTX
Cellular LayOut
PPTX
Group Layout (Manufacturing Management)
PPTX
Kanban Systems
PPT
Assembly line balancing
DOC
Operation management-notes
PPT
Production Planning and Control
PPTX
Process layout operations management
PPTX
Lean vs agile manufacturing
PPT
Line balancing
PPTX
Just in time manufacturing ppt
PPT
Capacity planning
79971255 assembly-line-balancing
Assembly line balancing
Assembly Line Balancing -Example
assembly line balancing
Line balancing
Work Study- Methods Study
cycle time, normal time and standard allowance
CAPACITY PLANNING
Cellular LayOut
Group Layout (Manufacturing Management)
Kanban Systems
Assembly line balancing
Operation management-notes
Production Planning and Control
Process layout operations management
Lean vs agile manufacturing
Line balancing
Just in time manufacturing ppt
Capacity planning
Ad

Similar to Operations Management : Line Balancing (20)

PPT
Tn6 facility+layout
PPT
Tn6 facility layout
PPT
Layout10
PPTX
Line balancing
PPTX
Industrial engineeering pli
PPT
Chapter 4 product layout - 1st (3)
PPTX
Product layout in Food Industry and Line Balancing
PPT
Line Balancing In Garments Industry
PPTX
Process selection and Facility Layout Session 3 (1).pptx
PPT
industrial and production Line Balancing.ppt
PPT
Chapter5-Facility Layout_POM.ppt
PDF
79971255-assembly-line-balancing-130223195412-phpapp02.pdf
PPT
Chapter 2 line_balancing no pics
PPT
Facility Layout in production management
PPTX
Sequencing and shedulding problems for Operations management
PDF
A line in apparel
PDF
vignesh conference
DOCX
Problem 6-2A manager wants to assign tasks to workstations as .docx
PPT
Ch5 process+analysis
PPT
Ch5 process analysis
Tn6 facility+layout
Tn6 facility layout
Layout10
Line balancing
Industrial engineeering pli
Chapter 4 product layout - 1st (3)
Product layout in Food Industry and Line Balancing
Line Balancing In Garments Industry
Process selection and Facility Layout Session 3 (1).pptx
industrial and production Line Balancing.ppt
Chapter5-Facility Layout_POM.ppt
79971255-assembly-line-balancing-130223195412-phpapp02.pdf
Chapter 2 line_balancing no pics
Facility Layout in production management
Sequencing and shedulding problems for Operations management
A line in apparel
vignesh conference
Problem 6-2A manager wants to assign tasks to workstations as .docx
Ch5 process+analysis
Ch5 process analysis
Ad

More from Rohan Bharaj (20)

PPTX
Category Management | Retail Management
PPTX
Hariyali Kisaan Bazaar | Rural Retail Initiative
PPTX
Pidilite Industries | Company Analysis
PPTX
Brannigan Foods | Harvard Case
PPT
Barack Obama's Digital Media Campaign for 2012 Elections
PDF
Advertisements depicting the 11 Rasas
PPTX
Snapchat for Business owners
PPTX
Services Marketing - Transitional Intensive Care (TIC)
PPTX
Brand Identity vs Brand Image of Lakme in India
PDF
Pricing Strategies by Coca-Cola in India
DOCX
Perception of People about ban of plastic bags in India
DOCX
Digital Banking for PSU banks in India
PDF
Communication Plan of launching a Comedy TV show in Nepal and Bangaldesh
DOCX
Launching Patanjali in United Kingdom
PPTX
Brand Positioning Statement of Volvo
DOCX
Brand Identity of Mercedes Benz
PPTX
The adoption of Electrically Powered Vehicles
PDF
Business Newsletter - India in 2026
PPTX
Louis Vuitton in Japan
PPTX
New Product Development - Refrigerator (Freeza)
Category Management | Retail Management
Hariyali Kisaan Bazaar | Rural Retail Initiative
Pidilite Industries | Company Analysis
Brannigan Foods | Harvard Case
Barack Obama's Digital Media Campaign for 2012 Elections
Advertisements depicting the 11 Rasas
Snapchat for Business owners
Services Marketing - Transitional Intensive Care (TIC)
Brand Identity vs Brand Image of Lakme in India
Pricing Strategies by Coca-Cola in India
Perception of People about ban of plastic bags in India
Digital Banking for PSU banks in India
Communication Plan of launching a Comedy TV show in Nepal and Bangaldesh
Launching Patanjali in United Kingdom
Brand Positioning Statement of Volvo
Brand Identity of Mercedes Benz
The adoption of Electrically Powered Vehicles
Business Newsletter - India in 2026
Louis Vuitton in Japan
New Product Development - Refrigerator (Freeza)

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
TFEC-4-2020-Design-Guide-for-Timber-Roof-Trusses.pdf
PPTX
CH1 Production IntroductoryConcepts.pptx
PDF
Enhancing Cyber Defense Against Zero-Day Attacks using Ensemble Neural Networks
PPTX
CYBER-CRIMES AND SECURITY A guide to understanding
PDF
Embodied AI: Ushering in the Next Era of Intelligent Systems
PPTX
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
PPTX
bas. eng. economics group 4 presentation 1.pptx
PPTX
web development for engineering and engineering
PDF
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
DOCX
573137875-Attendance-Management-System-original
PPTX
OOP with Java - Java Introduction (Basics)
PPTX
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
PDF
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
PPTX
M Tech Sem 1 Civil Engineering Environmental Sciences.pptx
PDF
Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2026
PPTX
Construction Project Organization Group 2.pptx
PPTX
UNIT-1 - COAL BASED THERMAL POWER PLANTS
PPT
Project quality management in manufacturing
PDF
composite construction of structures.pdf
PPTX
Welding lecture in detail for understanding
TFEC-4-2020-Design-Guide-for-Timber-Roof-Trusses.pdf
CH1 Production IntroductoryConcepts.pptx
Enhancing Cyber Defense Against Zero-Day Attacks using Ensemble Neural Networks
CYBER-CRIMES AND SECURITY A guide to understanding
Embodied AI: Ushering in the Next Era of Intelligent Systems
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
bas. eng. economics group 4 presentation 1.pptx
web development for engineering and engineering
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
573137875-Attendance-Management-System-original
OOP with Java - Java Introduction (Basics)
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
M Tech Sem 1 Civil Engineering Environmental Sciences.pptx
Mohammad Mahdi Farshadian CV - Prospective PhD Student 2026
Construction Project Organization Group 2.pptx
UNIT-1 - COAL BASED THERMAL POWER PLANTS
Project quality management in manufacturing
composite construction of structures.pdf
Welding lecture in detail for understanding

Operations Management : Line Balancing

  • 2.  Line balancing is the procedure in which tasks along task the assembly line are assigned to work station so each has approximately same amount of work.  A workstation within an assembly line in order to meet the required production rate and to achieve a minimum amount of idle time.
  • 3. BALANCED LINE  Promotes one piece flow  Avoids excessive work load in some stages (overburden)  Minimizes wastes (over-processing, inventory, waiting, rework, transportation, motion)  Reduces variation  Increased Efficiency  Minimizes Idle time UNBALANCED LINE  High work load in some stages (Overburden)  Maximizes wastes (over-processing, inventory, waiting, rework, transportation, motion)  High variation in output  Restrict one piece flow  Maximizes Idle time  Poor efficiency
  • 4.  TASK PRECEDENCE:The sequence in which tasks are performed.  CYCLETIME:The time expressed in minutes between two simultaneous products coming off the end of a production line.  PRODUCTIVETIME PER HOUR:The average number of minutes a workstation is working in an hour.  WORKSTATION:A physical area where a worker with tools/ one or more machines, or an unattended machines like a robot performs a particular set of task in a production line.  WORK CENTER:A small group of identical workstations, where each workstation performs the same set of task.  NUMBER OF WORKSTATIONSWORKING:The amount of work done at a work centre expressed in number of workstations.  MINIMUM NUMBER OF WORKSTATIONS:The least number of workstation that provides the required production.  ACTUAL NUMBER OF WORKSTATIONS:This is the total number of workstations required on the entire production line. It is calculated as the next higher integer of the number of workstations working.  UTILIZATION:The percentage of time a production line is working.
  • 5. Example of Assembly-Line Balancing Problem: An Assembly consists of the following elements as given in table below. The production rate required is one assembly every 15 minute. Determine the minimum no of workstations required so as to minimize the Balance- Delay. Find Balance Delay Station-wise. STEP 1. List the sequential relationships among tasks and then draw a precedence diagram Task A B C D E F G H I J K L Immediate Predecessor Nil A B B B B C,D G E I,F H,J K Task Time 12 6 6 2 2 12 7 5 1 4 6 7 7 min. 12 min. 12 min F 6 min C 6 min B 2 min D 6 min
  • 6. Incremental Utilisation (IU) Heuristic A heuristic method is a procedure that can find a good feasible solution for a given class of problems, but which is not necessarily an optimal solution. ❖ It add tasks to a workstation in a precedence task order. ❖ To each task added to the station, operators are added when necessary, and the station utilization is calculated by equation. ❖ Tasks are added at the used station until its utilization is 100%, or until a reduction occurs, considering the new task and another operator when necessary. ❖ Then, a new station is considered, and the procedure is repeated on the next workstation for the remaining tasks.
  • 7. The incremental utilization heuristic is appropriate when one or more task times is equal to or greater than the cycle time. An important advantage of this heuristic is that it is capable of solving line-balancing problems regardless of the length of task times relative to the cycle time.
  • 9. Example The back room operations of a fast food restaurant have these tasks:
  • 10. If 100 burgers per hour must be prepared by the crew and 50 minutes per hour must be prepared by the crew and 50 minutes per hour are productive: a.Draw a diagram of the precedence relationships. b. Compute the cycle time per burger in minutes. c. Compute the minimum number of workstations required. d. How would you combine tasks into workstations to minimize idle time? Use the incremental utilization heuristic. Evaluate your proposal.
  • 11. Solution a) Compute the cycle time per burger: Cycle time = Productive time/ hour Demand/ hour = 50 minutes/hour 100 burgers/ hour = 0.50 minute/burger b) Compute the minimum number of workstations: Minimum no. = Sum of task times x Demand/hour of workstations Productive time/hour = 5.07 minutes/burger x 100 burgers/hour 50 minutes/hour = 0.14 workstations
  • 14. d) Evaluation of the proposal: Utilization= Minimum number of workstations Actual number of workstations = 10.14 43 = 0.2358 or 23.58 %
  • 16. STEP 2. . Calculate the required workstation cycle time CYCLE TIME = (PRODUCTION TIME PER DAY) /(OUTPUT PER DAY) = 15 minutes STEP 3. Calculate the theoretical minimum number of workstations. NUMBER OF WORK STATIONS = ( SUM OF TOTAL TASK TIMES) / (CYCLE TIME) = 70 min’s / 15 min’s = 4.67 ≈ 5 (rounded) STEP 4. Choose a primary rule that will determine how tasks are to be assigned to workstations  For this example, our primary rule is to prioritize tasks based on the largest number of following tasks.  If there is a tie, our secondary rule is to prioritize tasks in the order of the longest task time.  In general, select rules that prioritize tasks according to the largest number of followers or based on length of time. STEP 5. Beginning with the first workstation, assign each task, one at a time, until the sum of the task times is equal to the workstation cycle time or until no other tasks can be assigned due to sequence or time restrictions. Task Number of Following Tasks A 11 B 10 C or D or E 4 I,F or G 3 H or J 2 K 1 L 0
  • 17. Stations Task TaskTime (in minutes) Number of Following Tasks Remaining Unassigned Time (Balance-Delay) Feasible Remaining Tasks Task with Most Followers Task with Longest Operating Time Station 1 A 12 11 3 IDLE None Station 2 B C D 6 6 2 10 4 4 9 3 1 IDLE C,D,E D,E None C,D,E D,E C D ,E Station 3 E F I 2 12 1 4 3 3 13 1 0 IDLE F,I, G I None F,I,G F Station 4 G H 7 5 3 2 8 3 IDLE H, J None H, J H Station 5 J K 4 6 2 1 11 5 IDLE K None Station 6 L 7 0 8 IDLE None
  • 18. STEP 7. Evaluate the efficiency of the line balance. EFFICIENCY = (SUM OF ALL TASK TIMES)/(ACTUAL NO OF WORKSTATIONS)X(CYCLE TIME) = (70) / (6) X (15) = 0.778 OR 77. 78 %
  • 19.  Cars for the masses  Cost $850  Built new plant at Highland Park, Michigan  Ford consulted FrederickTaylor, Creator of Scientific Management  Installation of Gravity Slides  December 1, 1913, the first large scale assembly line was officially launched Assembly Line- The Ford Way
  • 20.  Cars 84 Steps in the assembly line  Interchangeable parts  Less waste and higher quality product  Production time dropped from over 12 hours to just 93 mins  Produced 3,08,612 cars in 1914  Cost of ModelT dropped to $260 in 1924  Work time was reduced from 9 to 8 hours and wages doubled to $5 a day Assembly Line- The Ford Way
  • 21. Apparel Industry With proper implementation of line balancing it was seen that the efficiency was further increased.
  • 23.  Production lines were designed so that conveyor belts paced the speed of the employees work.This arrangement wasn't appreciated by the employees.  Inevitable changes lead to production lines being out of balance.  Rebalancing causes disruptions to production

Editor's Notes

  • #3: The line balancing problem is to arrange the individual processing and assembly tasks at the workstations so that the total time required at each workstation is approximately the same. *If the work elements can be grouped so that all the station times are exactly equal, we have perfect balance on the line and we can expect the production to flow smoothly.