SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Optimal Multicast Capacity and Delay Tradeoffs in
MANETs
ABSTRACT:
In this paper, we give a global perspective of multicast capacity and delay analysis
in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs). Specifically, we consider four node
mobility models: (1) two-dimensional i.i.d. mobility, (2) two-dimensional hybrid
random walk, (3) one-dimensional i.i.d. mobility, and (4) one-dimensional hybrid
random walk. Two mobility time-scales are investigated in this paper: (i) Fast
mobility where node mobility is at the same time-scale as data transmissions; (ii)
Slow mobility where node mobility is assumed to occur at a much slower time-
scale than data transmissions. Given a delay constraint D, we first characterize the
optimal multicast capacity for each of the eight types of mobility models, and then
we develop a scheme that can achieve a capacity-delay tradeoff close to the upper
bound up to a logarithmic factor. In addition, we also study heterogeneous
networks with infrastructure support.
EXISTING SYSTEM:
In Existing System, it was established in a static network with n nodes, there has
been tremendous interest in the networking research community to understand the
fundamental achievable capacity in wireless ad hoc networks. How to improve the
network performance, in terms of the capacity and delay, has been a central issue.
Heterogeneous networks with multicast traffic pattern were studied by existing
system. Wired base stations are used and their transmission range can cover the
whole network. One of the work in existing system studied a dense network with
fixed unit area. The helping nodes in their work are wireless, but have higher
power and only act as relays instead of sources or destinations. Other Existing
works all study static networks.
DISADVANTAGES OF EXISTING SYSTEM:
Limiting factors
Low redundancy.
PROPOSED SYSTEM:
In Proposed System, assume that at each time slot, bits can be transmitted in a
successful transmission. Mobility time scales: Two time scales of mobility are
considered in this paper:
Fast mobility: The mobility of nodes is at the same time scale as the transmission
of packets, i.e., in each time-slot, only one transmission is allowed.
Slow mobility: The mobility of nodes is much slower than the transmission of
packets, i.e., multiple transmissions may happen within one time-slot.
ADVANTAGES OF PROPOSED SYSTEM:
 The advantage of dimensional mobility lies in the fact that it is simple and
easily predictable, thus increasing the inter contact rate.
 Though nodes are limited to only moving horizontally or vertically, the
mobility range on their orbit lines is not restricted.
ALGORITHM USED:
Algorithm – Joint/Scheduling algorithm
In this algorithm, there are two types of transmissions:
1. Source-Relay(S-R) transmission and
2. Relay-Destination(R-D) transmission. Thus, when a particularly pair is
selected, there will be two conditions: S-R pair or R-D pair.
1) If node Nsend contains packet P in its relaying pool to be sent to Nreceive, and
Nsend is in the same cell as Nreceive, we call Nsend and Nreceive a R-D pair.
2) If node Nsend does not contain packet P in its relaying pool to be sent to
Nreceive, while node Nreceive does not contain packet P in its relaying pool to be
sent to Nsend, and Nsend is in the same cell as Nreceive, we call Nsend and
Nreceive a S-R pair.
MODULES:
1. SCHEDULING POLICIES
2. HETEROGENEOUS NETWORKS
3. TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE
MODULES DESCRIPTION:
SCHEDULING POLICIES
In this Module, the information about the current and past status of the
network, and can schedule any radio transmission in the current and future time
slots, similar. We say a packet is successfully delivered if and only if all
destinations within the multicast session have received the packet. In each time
slot, for each packet p that has not been successfully delivered and each of its
unreached destinations, the scheduler needs to perform the following two
functions:
1. Capture
The scheduler needs to decide whether to deliver packet to destination in
the current time slot. If yes, the scheduler then needs to choose one relay node
(possibly the source node itself) that has a copy of the packet at the beginning
of the timeslot, and schedules radio transmissions to forward this packet to
destination within the same timeslot, using possibly multi-hop transmissions.
When this happens successfully, we say that the chosen relay node has
successfully captured the destination of packet. We call this chosen relay node
the last mobile relay for packet and destination. And we call the distance
between the last mobile relay and the destination as the capture range.
2. Duplication
For a packet p that has not been successfully delivered, the scheduler
needs to decide whether to duplicate packet p to other nodes that does not
have the packet at the beginning of the time-slot. The scheduler also needs to
decide which nodes to relay from and relay to, and how.
HETEROGENEOUS NETWORKS
In this Module, All transmissions can be carried out either in ad hoc mode or
in infrastructure mode. We assume that the base stations have a same transmission
bandwidth, denoted for each. The bandwidth for each mobile ad hoc node is
denoted. Further, we evenly divide the bandwidth into two parts, one for uplink
transmissions and the other for downlink transmissions, so that these different
kinds of transmissions will not interfere with each other.
TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE
In this Module, A transmission in infrastructure mode is carried out in the
following steps:
1) Uplink: A mobile node holding packet is selected, and transmits this
packet to the nearest base station.
2) Infrastructure relay: Once a base station receives a packet from a mobile
node, all the other base stations share this packet immediately, (i.e., the delay is
considered to be zero) since all base stations are connected by wires.
3) Downlink: Each base station searches for all the packets needed in its own
sub region, and transmit all of them to their destined mobile nodes. At this step,
every base station will adopt TDMA schemes to delivered different packets for
different multicast sessions.
SYSTEM CONFIGURATION:-
HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS:-
 Processor - Pentium –IV
 Speed - 1.1 Ghz
 RAM - 512 MB(min)
 Hard Disk - 40 GB
 Key Board - Standard Windows Keyboard
 Mouse - Two or Three Button Mouse
 Monitor - LCD/LED
SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS:
• Operating system : Windows XP.
• Coding Language : C#.Net.
• Tool : VISUAL STUDIO 2008.
REFERENCE:
Jinbei Zhang, Xinbing Wang, Senior Member, IEEE, Xiaohua Tian, Member,
IEEE Yun Wang, Xiaoyu Chu, and Yu Cheng, “Optimal Multicast Capacity and
Delay Tradeoffs in MANETs”, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE
COMPUTING. 2013.

More Related Content

DOCX
Optimal multicast capacity and delay tradeoffs
DOCX
JPD1428 Multicast Capacity in MANET with Infrastructure Support
PPTX
Traffic-adaptive Medium Access Protocol
DOCX
DOTNET 2013 IEEE MOBILECOMPUTING PROJECT On the real time hardware implementa...
PDF
cluster based routing protocol for ad hoc networks
PPT
QSpiders - Good to Know Network Concepts
PPTX
Cluster based routing protocol 1
Optimal multicast capacity and delay tradeoffs
JPD1428 Multicast Capacity in MANET with Infrastructure Support
Traffic-adaptive Medium Access Protocol
DOTNET 2013 IEEE MOBILECOMPUTING PROJECT On the real time hardware implementa...
cluster based routing protocol for ad hoc networks
QSpiders - Good to Know Network Concepts
Cluster based routing protocol 1

What's hot (18)

PPTX
Geographical routing presentation
PPTX
Geographic Routing in WSN
PPTX
WSN-Routing Protocols Energy Efficient Routing
PPTX
Cluster based routing protocol
PPT
Routing ad hoc network
DOCX
IEEE 2014 DOTNET PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED PROJECTS Multicast capacity-in-manet-wi...
PPTX
Network layer
PDF
A survey of geographic routing protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
PDF
ShortPaper
PDF
Comparison of Various Unicast-Multicast Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc N...
PDF
Clustering based Time Slot Assignment Protocol for Improving Performance in U...
PPT
A Survey of Geographic Routing Protocols for Vehicular
PDF
Geographic routing protocol_in_wireless_sensor_networks
PPTX
Wsn routing protocol
PPTX
Ch 18 intro to network layer - section 3
DOCX
DOTNET 2013 IEEE MOBILECOMPUTING PROJECT Optimal multicast capacity and delay...
PPTX
Ch 18 intro to network layer - section 1
Geographical routing presentation
Geographic Routing in WSN
WSN-Routing Protocols Energy Efficient Routing
Cluster based routing protocol
Routing ad hoc network
IEEE 2014 DOTNET PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED PROJECTS Multicast capacity-in-manet-wi...
Network layer
A survey of geographic routing protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
ShortPaper
Comparison of Various Unicast-Multicast Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc N...
Clustering based Time Slot Assignment Protocol for Improving Performance in U...
A Survey of Geographic Routing Protocols for Vehicular
Geographic routing protocol_in_wireless_sensor_networks
Wsn routing protocol
Ch 18 intro to network layer - section 3
DOTNET 2013 IEEE MOBILECOMPUTING PROJECT Optimal multicast capacity and delay...
Ch 18 intro to network layer - section 1
Ad

Similar to Optimal multicast capacity and delay tradeoffs in mane ts (20)

DOCX
JAVA 2013 IEEE MOBILECOMPUTING PROJECT Optimal Multicast Capacity and Delay T...
DOCX
IEEE 2014 JAVA NETWORKING PROJECTS Optimal multicast capacity and delay trade...
DOCX
2014 IEEE JAVA NETWORKING PROJECT Optimal multicast capacity and delay tradeo...
DOCX
2014 IEEE DOTNET PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED PROJECT Multicast capacity-in-manet-wit...
DOCX
multicast capacity in manet with infrastructure support
DOCX
JPN1404 Optimal Multicast Capacity and Delay Tradeoffs in MANETs
DOCX
Optimal multicast capacity and delay tradeoffs in manets
PDF
Routing in « Delay Tolerant Networks » (DTN) Improved Routing With Prophet an...
PDF
Design Test-bed for assessing load utilising using Multicast Forwarding Appro...
PDF
Advanced delay reduction algorithm based on GPS with Load Balancing
PDF
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention (IJPSI)
PDF
Destination Aware APU Strategy for Geographic Routing in MANET
PDF
M phil-computer-science-mobile-computing-projects
PDF
M.Phil Computer Science Mobile Computing Projects
PDF
Improved routing scheme with ACO in WSN in comparison to DSDV
PDF
M.E Computer Science Mobile Computing Projects
PDF
Network layer (Unit 3) part1.pdf
DOCX
Generalized two
PDF
Mobile Relay Configuration in Data-Intensuive Wireless Sensor with Three Rout...
PDF
Paper id 36201515
JAVA 2013 IEEE MOBILECOMPUTING PROJECT Optimal Multicast Capacity and Delay T...
IEEE 2014 JAVA NETWORKING PROJECTS Optimal multicast capacity and delay trade...
2014 IEEE JAVA NETWORKING PROJECT Optimal multicast capacity and delay tradeo...
2014 IEEE DOTNET PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED PROJECT Multicast capacity-in-manet-wit...
multicast capacity in manet with infrastructure support
JPN1404 Optimal Multicast Capacity and Delay Tradeoffs in MANETs
Optimal multicast capacity and delay tradeoffs in manets
Routing in « Delay Tolerant Networks » (DTN) Improved Routing With Prophet an...
Design Test-bed for assessing load utilising using Multicast Forwarding Appro...
Advanced delay reduction algorithm based on GPS with Load Balancing
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention (IJPSI)
Destination Aware APU Strategy for Geographic Routing in MANET
M phil-computer-science-mobile-computing-projects
M.Phil Computer Science Mobile Computing Projects
Improved routing scheme with ACO in WSN in comparison to DSDV
M.E Computer Science Mobile Computing Projects
Network layer (Unit 3) part1.pdf
Generalized two
Mobile Relay Configuration in Data-Intensuive Wireless Sensor with Three Rout...
Paper id 36201515
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
O5-L3 Freight Transport Ops (International) V1.pdf
PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
PDF
Basic Mud Logging Guide for educational purpose
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
PDF
102 student loan defaulters named and shamed – Is someone you know on the list?
PDF
TR - Agricultural Crops Production NC III.pdf
PDF
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
PDF
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
PDF
FourierSeries-QuestionsWithAnswers(Part-A).pdf
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
PDF
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
PDF
Abdominal Access Techniques with Prof. Dr. R K Mishra
PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PDF
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
PPTX
Renaissance Architecture: A Journey from Faith to Humanism
PDF
3rd Neelam Sanjeevareddy Memorial Lecture.pdf
PPTX
school management -TNTEU- B.Ed., Semester II Unit 1.pptx
PPTX
BOWEL ELIMINATION FACTORS AFFECTING AND TYPES
PDF
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
O5-L3 Freight Transport Ops (International) V1.pdf
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
Basic Mud Logging Guide for educational purpose
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
102 student loan defaulters named and shamed – Is someone you know on the list?
TR - Agricultural Crops Production NC III.pdf
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
FourierSeries-QuestionsWithAnswers(Part-A).pdf
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Pharmacology of Heart Failure /Pharmacotherapy of CHF
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
Abdominal Access Techniques with Prof. Dr. R K Mishra
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
2.FourierTransform-ShortQuestionswithAnswers.pdf
Renaissance Architecture: A Journey from Faith to Humanism
3rd Neelam Sanjeevareddy Memorial Lecture.pdf
school management -TNTEU- B.Ed., Semester II Unit 1.pptx
BOWEL ELIMINATION FACTORS AFFECTING AND TYPES
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf

Optimal multicast capacity and delay tradeoffs in mane ts

  • 1. Optimal Multicast Capacity and Delay Tradeoffs in MANETs ABSTRACT: In this paper, we give a global perspective of multicast capacity and delay analysis in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs). Specifically, we consider four node mobility models: (1) two-dimensional i.i.d. mobility, (2) two-dimensional hybrid random walk, (3) one-dimensional i.i.d. mobility, and (4) one-dimensional hybrid random walk. Two mobility time-scales are investigated in this paper: (i) Fast mobility where node mobility is at the same time-scale as data transmissions; (ii) Slow mobility where node mobility is assumed to occur at a much slower time- scale than data transmissions. Given a delay constraint D, we first characterize the optimal multicast capacity for each of the eight types of mobility models, and then we develop a scheme that can achieve a capacity-delay tradeoff close to the upper bound up to a logarithmic factor. In addition, we also study heterogeneous networks with infrastructure support.
  • 2. EXISTING SYSTEM: In Existing System, it was established in a static network with n nodes, there has been tremendous interest in the networking research community to understand the fundamental achievable capacity in wireless ad hoc networks. How to improve the network performance, in terms of the capacity and delay, has been a central issue. Heterogeneous networks with multicast traffic pattern were studied by existing system. Wired base stations are used and their transmission range can cover the whole network. One of the work in existing system studied a dense network with fixed unit area. The helping nodes in their work are wireless, but have higher power and only act as relays instead of sources or destinations. Other Existing works all study static networks. DISADVANTAGES OF EXISTING SYSTEM: Limiting factors Low redundancy.
  • 3. PROPOSED SYSTEM: In Proposed System, assume that at each time slot, bits can be transmitted in a successful transmission. Mobility time scales: Two time scales of mobility are considered in this paper: Fast mobility: The mobility of nodes is at the same time scale as the transmission of packets, i.e., in each time-slot, only one transmission is allowed. Slow mobility: The mobility of nodes is much slower than the transmission of packets, i.e., multiple transmissions may happen within one time-slot. ADVANTAGES OF PROPOSED SYSTEM:  The advantage of dimensional mobility lies in the fact that it is simple and easily predictable, thus increasing the inter contact rate.  Though nodes are limited to only moving horizontally or vertically, the mobility range on their orbit lines is not restricted. ALGORITHM USED: Algorithm – Joint/Scheduling algorithm
  • 4. In this algorithm, there are two types of transmissions: 1. Source-Relay(S-R) transmission and 2. Relay-Destination(R-D) transmission. Thus, when a particularly pair is selected, there will be two conditions: S-R pair or R-D pair. 1) If node Nsend contains packet P in its relaying pool to be sent to Nreceive, and Nsend is in the same cell as Nreceive, we call Nsend and Nreceive a R-D pair. 2) If node Nsend does not contain packet P in its relaying pool to be sent to Nreceive, while node Nreceive does not contain packet P in its relaying pool to be sent to Nsend, and Nsend is in the same cell as Nreceive, we call Nsend and Nreceive a S-R pair.
  • 5. MODULES: 1. SCHEDULING POLICIES 2. HETEROGENEOUS NETWORKS 3. TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE MODULES DESCRIPTION: SCHEDULING POLICIES In this Module, the information about the current and past status of the network, and can schedule any radio transmission in the current and future time slots, similar. We say a packet is successfully delivered if and only if all destinations within the multicast session have received the packet. In each time slot, for each packet p that has not been successfully delivered and each of its unreached destinations, the scheduler needs to perform the following two functions: 1. Capture The scheduler needs to decide whether to deliver packet to destination in the current time slot. If yes, the scheduler then needs to choose one relay node (possibly the source node itself) that has a copy of the packet at the beginning of the timeslot, and schedules radio transmissions to forward this packet to destination within the same timeslot, using possibly multi-hop transmissions. When this happens successfully, we say that the chosen relay node has
  • 6. successfully captured the destination of packet. We call this chosen relay node the last mobile relay for packet and destination. And we call the distance between the last mobile relay and the destination as the capture range. 2. Duplication For a packet p that has not been successfully delivered, the scheduler needs to decide whether to duplicate packet p to other nodes that does not have the packet at the beginning of the time-slot. The scheduler also needs to decide which nodes to relay from and relay to, and how. HETEROGENEOUS NETWORKS In this Module, All transmissions can be carried out either in ad hoc mode or in infrastructure mode. We assume that the base stations have a same transmission bandwidth, denoted for each. The bandwidth for each mobile ad hoc node is denoted. Further, we evenly divide the bandwidth into two parts, one for uplink transmissions and the other for downlink transmissions, so that these different kinds of transmissions will not interfere with each other.
  • 7. TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE In this Module, A transmission in infrastructure mode is carried out in the following steps: 1) Uplink: A mobile node holding packet is selected, and transmits this packet to the nearest base station. 2) Infrastructure relay: Once a base station receives a packet from a mobile node, all the other base stations share this packet immediately, (i.e., the delay is considered to be zero) since all base stations are connected by wires. 3) Downlink: Each base station searches for all the packets needed in its own sub region, and transmit all of them to their destined mobile nodes. At this step, every base station will adopt TDMA schemes to delivered different packets for different multicast sessions. SYSTEM CONFIGURATION:- HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS:-  Processor - Pentium –IV  Speed - 1.1 Ghz  RAM - 512 MB(min)
  • 8.  Hard Disk - 40 GB  Key Board - Standard Windows Keyboard  Mouse - Two or Three Button Mouse  Monitor - LCD/LED SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS: • Operating system : Windows XP. • Coding Language : C#.Net. • Tool : VISUAL STUDIO 2008. REFERENCE: Jinbei Zhang, Xinbing Wang, Senior Member, IEEE, Xiaohua Tian, Member, IEEE Yun Wang, Xiaoyu Chu, and Yu Cheng, “Optimal Multicast Capacity and Delay Tradeoffs in MANETs”, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING. 2013.