SlideShare a Scribd company logo
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
E-ISSN: 2321 – 4767 P-ISSN: 2321 - 4759
www.ijmsi.org Volume 3 Issue 7 || November. 2015 || PP-40-44
www.ijmsi.org 40 | Page
Probabilistic diameter and its properties.
Dr. Ayaz Ahmad
Reader,Deptt. of Mathematics Millat College, Darbhanga, BIHAR, PIN;846004
Abstract: In this paper ,we discuss on probabilistic diameter and some of its basic properties.
Key Words: Probabilistic diameter, Probabilistic distance, Distribution function.
I. Introduction
Probabilistic metric spaces were first introduced by K. Menger in 1942 and reconsidered by him in the early
1950’s B. Schweizer and A. Sklar have been studying these spaces, and have developed their theory in depth. In
probabilistic metric spaces the notion of distance between two points x and y is replaced by a distribution
function Fxy. Thus, the distance between points as being probabilistic with Fxy(t) representing the probability that
the distance between x and y is less than t.
Definition: 1.1. Let (S, F,T) denote a Menger space with a continuous t-norm and A be a nonempty subset of S.
The function DA, defined by
DA (x) =







)(
,
tFInfSup pq
Aqpxt
, is called the probabilistic diameter of A.
Properties of the probabilistic diameter.
Defenition.1.2.A nonempty subset A of S is bounded if Supx DA(x) = 1,
semi-bounded if 0 < Sup DA(x) < 1, and unbounded if DA = 0.
P1 ) The function DA is a distribution function
P2 ) If A is a nonempty subset of S, then DA = H if and only if A consists of a single point.
P3 ) If A and B are nonempty subsets of S and A

B, then DA

DB.
Theorem.1.3. If A and B are two nonempty subsets of S such that A  B = ,
then DAUB(x + y)T(DA(x), DB(y))…………. (1.1)
Proof. Let x and y be given. To establish (1.1) we first show that
))(),(()(
,,,
yFInfxFInfTyxFInf pq
Bqp
pq
Aqp
pq
BAqp 


………… (1.2)
There are two distinct cases to consider:
Case (1).
)()(
,
yxFInfyxFInf pq
Bq
AP
pq
BAqp



………………(1.3)
Now for any triple of points p,q and r in S, we have
Fpq(x + y) T(Fpr(x), Frq(y)).
Taking the Infimum of both sides of this inequality as p ranges over A, q ranges over B and r ranges over A  B
BAr
Bq
Ap
rqprpq
BAqp
yFxFTInfyxFInf



 )).(),(()(
,
However, since T is continuous and non decreasing ,we obtain,








)(),()(
,,,
yFrqInfxFInfTysFInf
Bqr
pr
Arp
pq
BAqp
.
Case (2).
)()(
,
yxFInfyxFInf pq
Bq
Ap
pq
BAqp



.
In this case of the equalities,
)()(
,,
yxFInfyxFInf pq
Aqp
pq
BAqp


Or
Probabilistic diameter and its properties
www.ijmsi.org 41 | Page
)()(
,,
yxFInfyxFInf pq
Bqp
pq
BAqp


must hold. If the first equality holds, we
have








)(),()(
,,
yHxFInfTyxFInf pq
Aqp
pq
BAqp








)(),(
,,
yFInfxFInfT pq
Bqp
pq
Aqp
The same argument works for the second equality.
This establishes (1.2.).
Finally using the fact that the rectangle
{(s, t): 0
ytx  0,
}
is contained in the triangle {(s, t): s, t 0, s + t < x + y},
the inequality (1.2) and the continuity of T. we have
DAB(x+y) =








)(
,
tsFInfSup pq
BAqpyxtS










)(
,
txFInfSup pq
BAqp
yt
xS






















)(,)(
,,
tFInfSupsFInfSupT pq
Bqpvt
pq
AqpXS
= T(DA(x), DB(y)).
Theorem.1.4. If A is a nonempty subset of S, then DA = D A
, where A denotes the closure of A in the ε – λ
topology on S.
Proof. Since A
A
, if follows from property P1 that DA A
D
.
Let  > 0 be given. In view of the uniform continuity of  with respect to the Levy metric L there exists an
ε > 0 and a λ > 0 such that for any four points p1, p2, p3 and p4 in S, L(Fp1p2, Fp3p4) < 
When ever Fp1p3 (ε) > 1 – λ and Fp2p4(ε) > 1 – λ.
Next, with each point P and A associate a point P(
p
) in A such that
Fp
   pp
> 1 – λ.
Then, in view of the above for any pair of points
p
and
q
A,
L(F
ppF
qqpp ),()(
) < .
In particular, for all t we have, F
)()(
)()(
tFt
qpqqpp
 
.
Let A
= {p(
):) App 
. Then since A 
A,
 

))(()()(
,,
tqqppInftFInf
Aqp
qP
AqP
=




)()(
,,
tFInftFInf pq
Aqp
pq
Aqp
.
Now, taking the suprimum for t < x of the above inequality yields
D
 













)()()(
,,
tFInfSuptFInfSupx pq
Aqpxt
qp
Aqpxt
A
=







)(
,
tFInfSup pq
Aqpxt 
- = DA (x - -) -
Since the above inequality is valid for all  and,
since DA is left continuous.
It follows that A
D
(x) DA(x).Hence A
D
(x) = DA(x),
Probabilistic diameter and its properties
www.ijmsi.org 42 | Page
Hence, the proof is complete.
Definition.1.5. Let A and B be nonempty subsets for S. The probabilistic distance between A and B is the
function FAB defined by
FAB(x) =





















)(,)( tFSupInftFSupInfTSup pq
BpBq
pq
BqApxt
……… (1.4)
The following are the properties of FAB.
P4. FAB is a distribution function.
P5. If A and B are nonempty subsets of S, then FAB = FBA.
P6. If A is a nonempty subset of S, then FAA = H.
Theorem.1.6. If A and B are nonempty subsets of S, then FAB = F BA
.
Proof. It is sufficient to show that FAB = F BA
since this result together with property P5 yields.
Hence, FAB = FA
BAABABB
FFF 
.
Now, we first show that
BBSinceFF ABBA
 .
for all t,













)()( tFSupInftFSupInf
qp
ApBq
pq
ApBq
………….. (1.5)
Let  > 0 be given. The argument given in the proof of Theorem( 1.4) establishes that for each point
Bq 
,
there exists a point q(
q
) in B such that for all t,
  )()( tFtF qpqqp
 
.
Let B = {q(
q
) :
Bq 
}. Since B 
B we have,
)()()( tFSuptSuptFSup pq
BqBq
qp
Bq 


 )(tFSup pq
Bq

.
Consequently,














)()(sup tFSupInftFInf pq
BpAp
qp
BqAp

.
Now ,taking the supremum on t < x of the above inequality,yields for any ,
f(x)
 































)()( tFSupInfSuptFSupInfSup
qp
BqApxx
pq
BqApxt
df
=


















)()( xgdftFSupInfSup
qp
BqAqxt
.
since both f and g are left-continuous and  is arbitrary, it follows that
f(x)  g(x). This together with (1.2.5), and the continuity of T yields.
FAB(x) = 


































)(,)( yFSupInfSuptFSupInfSupT pq
ApBqxt
pq
BqApxt






































)(,)( tFSupInfSuptFSupInfSupT
qp
ApBqxt
qp
BqApxt
=
)()(,)( xFtFSupInftFSupInfTSup
BAqp
ApBq
qp
BqApxt






















.
A similar argument shows that F BA
 FAB.
Theorem.1.7. If A and B are nonempty subsets of S,
Probabilistic diameter and its properties
www.ijmsi.org 43 | Page
then FAB = H, if and only if
BA 
.
Proof. Suppose FAB = H and let ε > 0 be given. Then
1 = FAB (ε) = T 


































)(,)( tFSupInfSuptFSupInfSup pq
ApBqt
pq
BqApt 
=






















)()( 

pq
ApBq
pq
ApBqt
FSupInftFSupInfSup
.
So that for any q  B and every λ > 0 there exists a point p in A for which Fpq (ε) > 1 – λ. Consequently, q is an
accumulation point of A and we have B
 A . A similar argument shows that A
B
. Conversely, suppose
BA 
.
Then in view of P6 and Theorem 1.7
We have, FAB = AABA
FF 
= H.
Theorem.1.8. If A, B and C are nonempty subsets of S, then for any x and y FAB (x - y)

T(FAC(x),
FBC(y)).
Proof. Let u and v be given. Then for any triple of points p, q and r in S we have Fpq(u+v)

T(Fpr(u), Fqr(v)).
Making use of the continuity and monotonicity of T we have the following inequality :
















)(),()( vFSupInfuFSupTvuFSup qr
BqCr
pr
Cr
pq
Bq 
.
Consequently,


























)(,)()( vFSupInfuFSupInfTvuFSupInf rq
BqCr
pr
CrAp
pq
BqAp
.
Similarly,


























)(,)()( vFSupInfuFSupInfTvuFSupInf rq
CqBr
pr
ArCp
pq
AqBp
Therefore, since T is associative,
we have




















)_(,)( vuFSupInfvuFSupInfT pq
AqBr
pq
BrAp























)(,)( uFSupInfuFSupInfTT pr
ApCr
pr
CrAp
,
 T 





















)(,)( vFSupInfvFSupInf qr
BqCr
qr
CrBq
.
So, we have FAB(x+ y) =












,)( vuFSupInfTSup pq
BqApyxvu












)( vuFSupInf pq
ApBq
























)(,)( vuFSupInfvuFSupInfTSup pq
BqBq
pq
BqAp
yv
xu
=T 





















,)(,)( uFSupInfuFSupInfTSup pr
ApCr
pr
CrApxu
Probabilistic diameter and its properties
www.ijmsi.org 44 | Page
 





















)(,)( uFSupInfuFSupInfTSup qr
BpCr
qr
CrBpyv
=T(FAC(x), FBC(y)).
References:
[1] R. Egbert, Cartesian products of statistical metric spaces, Amer. Math. Soc. Notices 10 (1963), 266-267.
[2] V. Istratescu and I. Vaduva, Products of statistical metric spaces (Romanian), Acad. R. P. Romine Stud. Cerc. Mat. 12 (1961),
567-574.
[3] K. Menger, Statistical metrics, Proc. Nat. Acad. Of Science. U.S.A. 28 (1942), 535-537.
[4] K.Menger, Probabilistic geometry, Pro. Nat. Acad. Of Science. U.S.A. 37 (1951), 226-229.
[5] K.Menger, Geometrie generale (Chap. VII), Memorial des Sciences Mathematiques, No. 124, Paris 1954.
[6] B. Schweizer, Equivalence relations in probabilistic metric spaces, Bulletin of the Polytechnic Inst. Of Jassy 10 (1964), 67-70.
*******

More Related Content

PDF
Congruence Lattices of A Finite Uniform Lattices
PDF
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
PDF
The Chase in Database Theory
PDF
Functionalanalysis ejemplos infinitos
PDF
PaperNo10-KaramiHabibiSafariZarrabi-IJCMS
PDF
InvolveSubmission
PDF
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
PDF
project
Congruence Lattices of A Finite Uniform Lattices
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
The Chase in Database Theory
Functionalanalysis ejemplos infinitos
PaperNo10-KaramiHabibiSafariZarrabi-IJCMS
InvolveSubmission
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
project

What's hot (19)

PDF
γ Regular-open sets and γ-extremally disconnected spaces
PPT
Pc9-1 polar coordinates
PDF
bT-Locally Closed Sets and bT-Locally Continuous Functions In Supra Topologic...
PDF
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
PDF
PaperNo1-ErshadYousefiHabibi-IJMS
PPTX
Unit 1: Topological spaces (its definition and definition of open sets)
PPT
Introduction To Polar Coordinates And Graphs
PDF
Note on closed sets in topological spaces
PDF
(𝛕𝐢, 𝛕𝐣)− RGB Closed Sets in Bitopological Spaces
PDF
LPS talk notes
PDF
Boolean Programs and Quantified Propositional Proof System -
PDF
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
PDF
Hamilton-Jacobi equations and Lax-Hopf formulae for traffic flow modeling
PPTX
Topology M.Sc. 2 semester Mathematics compactness, unit - 4
PDF
Polytopes inside polytopes
PPTX
Applied Calculus Chapter 1 polar coordinates and vector
 
PDF
Congruence Distributive Varieties With Compact Intersection Property
PDF
Computational logic First Order Logic_part2
γ Regular-open sets and γ-extremally disconnected spaces
Pc9-1 polar coordinates
bT-Locally Closed Sets and bT-Locally Continuous Functions In Supra Topologic...
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
PaperNo1-ErshadYousefiHabibi-IJMS
Unit 1: Topological spaces (its definition and definition of open sets)
Introduction To Polar Coordinates And Graphs
Note on closed sets in topological spaces
(𝛕𝐢, 𝛕𝐣)− RGB Closed Sets in Bitopological Spaces
LPS talk notes
Boolean Programs and Quantified Propositional Proof System -
Reciprocity Law For Flat Conformal Metrics With Conical Singularities
Hamilton-Jacobi equations and Lax-Hopf formulae for traffic flow modeling
Topology M.Sc. 2 semester Mathematics compactness, unit - 4
Polytopes inside polytopes
Applied Calculus Chapter 1 polar coordinates and vector
 
Congruence Distributive Varieties With Compact Intersection Property
Computational logic First Order Logic_part2
Ad

Viewers also liked (7)

PDF
An Improved Regression Type Estimator of Finite Population Mean using Coeffic...
PPTX
EphGEE: Ephemeral Gully Erosion Estimator - Dabney
PDF
Ali, Redescending M-estimator
DOCX
Ali Redescending M-Estimator
PDF
PAC-Bayesian Bound for Gaussian Process Regression and Multiple Kernel Additi...
PDF
Econometrics Lecture Notes : Chapter 1
PDF
Econometrics notes (Introduction, Simple Linear regression, Multiple linear r...
An Improved Regression Type Estimator of Finite Population Mean using Coeffic...
EphGEE: Ephemeral Gully Erosion Estimator - Dabney
Ali, Redescending M-estimator
Ali Redescending M-Estimator
PAC-Bayesian Bound for Gaussian Process Regression and Multiple Kernel Additi...
Econometrics Lecture Notes : Chapter 1
Econometrics notes (Introduction, Simple Linear regression, Multiple linear r...
Ad

Similar to Probabilistic diameter and its properties. (20)

PDF
Course material mca
PDF
mathes probabality mca syllabus for probability and stats
PPT
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
PDF
Appendix to MLPI Lecture 2 - Monte Carlo Methods (Basics)
PDF
PTSP PPT.pdf
PDF
Introduction to Discrete Probabilities with Scilab - Michaël Baudin, Consort...
PDF
Probability cheatsheet
PDF
11.[29 35]a unique common fixed point theorem under psi varphi contractive co...
PDF
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
PDF
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
PDF
week01, the language of propositional logic.pdf
PDF
Real Analysis II (Measure Theory) Notes
PDF
Random Variable
PDF
Unique fixed point theorems for generalized weakly contractive condition in o...
PDF
17-recursive-definitions-and-structural-induction.pdf
PPT
Discrete probability
PDF
Probability and Entanglement
PDF
E42012426
PPT
PDF
Probability Cheatsheet.pdf
Course material mca
mathes probabality mca syllabus for probability and stats
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Appendix to MLPI Lecture 2 - Monte Carlo Methods (Basics)
PTSP PPT.pdf
Introduction to Discrete Probabilities with Scilab - Michaël Baudin, Consort...
Probability cheatsheet
11.[29 35]a unique common fixed point theorem under psi varphi contractive co...
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
week01, the language of propositional logic.pdf
Real Analysis II (Measure Theory) Notes
Random Variable
Unique fixed point theorems for generalized weakly contractive condition in o...
17-recursive-definitions-and-structural-induction.pdf
Discrete probability
Probability and Entanglement
E42012426
Probability Cheatsheet.pdf

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Introduction to Cardiovascular system_structure and functions-1
PPTX
C1 cut-Methane and it's Derivatives.pptx
PPT
POSITIONING IN OPERATION THEATRE ROOM.ppt
PDF
. Radiology Case Scenariosssssssssssssss
PPTX
Pharmacology of Autonomic nervous system
PPTX
2. Earth - The Living Planet Module 2ELS
PDF
CHAPTER 3 Cell Structures and Their Functions Lecture Outline.pdf
PDF
SEHH2274 Organic Chemistry Notes 1 Structure and Bonding.pdf
PPTX
POULTRY PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENTNNN.pptx
PPTX
Fluid dynamics vivavoce presentation of prakash
PPTX
ognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based approaches, coping skills trai...
PPTX
Vitamins & Minerals: Complete Guide to Functions, Food Sources, Deficiency Si...
PDF
Placing the Near-Earth Object Impact Probability in Context
PPTX
cpcsea ppt.pptxssssssssssssssjjdjdndndddd
PDF
CAPERS-LRD-z9:AGas-enshroudedLittleRedDotHostingaBroad-lineActive GalacticNuc...
PPTX
7. General Toxicologyfor clinical phrmacy.pptx
PPTX
Overview of calcium in human muscles.pptx
PPTX
Classification Systems_TAXONOMY_SCIENCE8.pptx
PPTX
ECG_Course_Presentation د.محمد صقران ppt
PPTX
2Systematics of Living Organisms t-.pptx
Introduction to Cardiovascular system_structure and functions-1
C1 cut-Methane and it's Derivatives.pptx
POSITIONING IN OPERATION THEATRE ROOM.ppt
. Radiology Case Scenariosssssssssssssss
Pharmacology of Autonomic nervous system
2. Earth - The Living Planet Module 2ELS
CHAPTER 3 Cell Structures and Their Functions Lecture Outline.pdf
SEHH2274 Organic Chemistry Notes 1 Structure and Bonding.pdf
POULTRY PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENTNNN.pptx
Fluid dynamics vivavoce presentation of prakash
ognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based approaches, coping skills trai...
Vitamins & Minerals: Complete Guide to Functions, Food Sources, Deficiency Si...
Placing the Near-Earth Object Impact Probability in Context
cpcsea ppt.pptxssssssssssssssjjdjdndndddd
CAPERS-LRD-z9:AGas-enshroudedLittleRedDotHostingaBroad-lineActive GalacticNuc...
7. General Toxicologyfor clinical phrmacy.pptx
Overview of calcium in human muscles.pptx
Classification Systems_TAXONOMY_SCIENCE8.pptx
ECG_Course_Presentation د.محمد صقران ppt
2Systematics of Living Organisms t-.pptx

Probabilistic diameter and its properties.

  • 1. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI) E-ISSN: 2321 – 4767 P-ISSN: 2321 - 4759 www.ijmsi.org Volume 3 Issue 7 || November. 2015 || PP-40-44 www.ijmsi.org 40 | Page Probabilistic diameter and its properties. Dr. Ayaz Ahmad Reader,Deptt. of Mathematics Millat College, Darbhanga, BIHAR, PIN;846004 Abstract: In this paper ,we discuss on probabilistic diameter and some of its basic properties. Key Words: Probabilistic diameter, Probabilistic distance, Distribution function. I. Introduction Probabilistic metric spaces were first introduced by K. Menger in 1942 and reconsidered by him in the early 1950’s B. Schweizer and A. Sklar have been studying these spaces, and have developed their theory in depth. In probabilistic metric spaces the notion of distance between two points x and y is replaced by a distribution function Fxy. Thus, the distance between points as being probabilistic with Fxy(t) representing the probability that the distance between x and y is less than t. Definition: 1.1. Let (S, F,T) denote a Menger space with a continuous t-norm and A be a nonempty subset of S. The function DA, defined by DA (x) =        )( , tFInfSup pq Aqpxt , is called the probabilistic diameter of A. Properties of the probabilistic diameter. Defenition.1.2.A nonempty subset A of S is bounded if Supx DA(x) = 1, semi-bounded if 0 < Sup DA(x) < 1, and unbounded if DA = 0. P1 ) The function DA is a distribution function P2 ) If A is a nonempty subset of S, then DA = H if and only if A consists of a single point. P3 ) If A and B are nonempty subsets of S and A  B, then DA  DB. Theorem.1.3. If A and B are two nonempty subsets of S such that A  B = , then DAUB(x + y)T(DA(x), DB(y))…………. (1.1) Proof. Let x and y be given. To establish (1.1) we first show that ))(),(()( ,,, yFInfxFInfTyxFInf pq Bqp pq Aqp pq BAqp    ………… (1.2) There are two distinct cases to consider: Case (1). )()( , yxFInfyxFInf pq Bq AP pq BAqp    ………………(1.3) Now for any triple of points p,q and r in S, we have Fpq(x + y) T(Fpr(x), Frq(y)). Taking the Infimum of both sides of this inequality as p ranges over A, q ranges over B and r ranges over A  B BAr Bq Ap rqprpq BAqp yFxFTInfyxFInf     )).(),(()( , However, since T is continuous and non decreasing ,we obtain,         )(),()( ,,, yFrqInfxFInfTysFInf Bqr pr Arp pq BAqp . Case (2). )()( , yxFInfyxFInf pq Bq Ap pq BAqp    . In this case of the equalities, )()( ,, yxFInfyxFInf pq Aqp pq BAqp   Or
  • 2. Probabilistic diameter and its properties www.ijmsi.org 41 | Page )()( ,, yxFInfyxFInf pq Bqp pq BAqp   must hold. If the first equality holds, we have         )(),()( ,, yHxFInfTyxFInf pq Aqp pq BAqp         )(),( ,, yFInfxFInfT pq Bqp pq Aqp The same argument works for the second equality. This establishes (1.2.). Finally using the fact that the rectangle {(s, t): 0 ytx  0, } is contained in the triangle {(s, t): s, t 0, s + t < x + y}, the inequality (1.2) and the continuity of T. we have DAB(x+y) =         )( , tsFInfSup pq BAqpyxtS           )( , txFInfSup pq BAqp yt xS                       )(,)( ,, tFInfSupsFInfSupT pq Bqpvt pq AqpXS = T(DA(x), DB(y)). Theorem.1.4. If A is a nonempty subset of S, then DA = D A , where A denotes the closure of A in the ε – λ topology on S. Proof. Since A A , if follows from property P1 that DA A D . Let  > 0 be given. In view of the uniform continuity of  with respect to the Levy metric L there exists an ε > 0 and a λ > 0 such that for any four points p1, p2, p3 and p4 in S, L(Fp1p2, Fp3p4) <  When ever Fp1p3 (ε) > 1 – λ and Fp2p4(ε) > 1 – λ. Next, with each point P and A associate a point P( p ) in A such that Fp    pp > 1 – λ. Then, in view of the above for any pair of points p and q A, L(F ppF qqpp ),()( ) < . In particular, for all t we have, F )()( )()( tFt qpqqpp   . Let A = {p( ):) App  . Then since A  A,    ))(()()( ,, tqqppInftFInf Aqp qP AqP =     )()( ,, tFInftFInf pq Aqp pq Aqp . Now, taking the suprimum for t < x of the above inequality yields D                )()()( ,, tFInfSuptFInfSupx pq Aqpxt qp Aqpxt A =        )( , tFInfSup pq Aqpxt  - = DA (x - -) - Since the above inequality is valid for all  and, since DA is left continuous. It follows that A D (x) DA(x).Hence A D (x) = DA(x),
  • 3. Probabilistic diameter and its properties www.ijmsi.org 42 | Page Hence, the proof is complete. Definition.1.5. Let A and B be nonempty subsets for S. The probabilistic distance between A and B is the function FAB defined by FAB(x) =                      )(,)( tFSupInftFSupInfTSup pq BpBq pq BqApxt ……… (1.4) The following are the properties of FAB. P4. FAB is a distribution function. P5. If A and B are nonempty subsets of S, then FAB = FBA. P6. If A is a nonempty subset of S, then FAA = H. Theorem.1.6. If A and B are nonempty subsets of S, then FAB = F BA . Proof. It is sufficient to show that FAB = F BA since this result together with property P5 yields. Hence, FAB = FA BAABABB FFF  . Now, we first show that BBSinceFF ABBA  . for all t,              )()( tFSupInftFSupInf qp ApBq pq ApBq ………….. (1.5) Let  > 0 be given. The argument given in the proof of Theorem( 1.4) establishes that for each point Bq  , there exists a point q( q ) in B such that for all t,   )()( tFtF qpqqp   . Let B = {q( q ) : Bq  }. Since B  B we have, )()()( tFSuptSuptFSup pq BqBq qp Bq     )(tFSup pq Bq  . Consequently,               )()(sup tFSupInftFInf pq BpAp qp BqAp  . Now ,taking the supremum on t < x of the above inequality,yields for any , f(x)                                  )()( tFSupInfSuptFSupInfSup qp BqApxx pq BqApxt df =                   )()( xgdftFSupInfSup qp BqAqxt . since both f and g are left-continuous and  is arbitrary, it follows that f(x)  g(x). This together with (1.2.5), and the continuity of T yields. FAB(x) =                                    )(,)( yFSupInfSuptFSupInfSupT pq ApBqxt pq BqApxt                                       )(,)( tFSupInfSuptFSupInfSupT qp ApBqxt qp BqApxt = )()(,)( xFtFSupInftFSupInfTSup BAqp ApBq qp BqApxt                       . A similar argument shows that F BA  FAB. Theorem.1.7. If A and B are nonempty subsets of S,
  • 4. Probabilistic diameter and its properties www.ijmsi.org 43 | Page then FAB = H, if and only if BA  . Proof. Suppose FAB = H and let ε > 0 be given. Then 1 = FAB (ε) = T                                    )(,)( tFSupInfSuptFSupInfSup pq ApBqt pq BqApt  =                       )()(   pq ApBq pq ApBqt FSupInftFSupInfSup . So that for any q  B and every λ > 0 there exists a point p in A for which Fpq (ε) > 1 – λ. Consequently, q is an accumulation point of A and we have B  A . A similar argument shows that A B . Conversely, suppose BA  . Then in view of P6 and Theorem 1.7 We have, FAB = AABA FF  = H. Theorem.1.8. If A, B and C are nonempty subsets of S, then for any x and y FAB (x - y)  T(FAC(x), FBC(y)). Proof. Let u and v be given. Then for any triple of points p, q and r in S we have Fpq(u+v)  T(Fpr(u), Fqr(v)). Making use of the continuity and monotonicity of T we have the following inequality :                 )(),()( vFSupInfuFSupTvuFSup qr BqCr pr Cr pq Bq  . Consequently,                           )(,)()( vFSupInfuFSupInfTvuFSupInf rq BqCr pr CrAp pq BqAp . Similarly,                           )(,)()( vFSupInfuFSupInfTvuFSupInf rq CqBr pr ArCp pq AqBp Therefore, since T is associative, we have                     )_(,)( vuFSupInfvuFSupInfT pq AqBr pq BrAp                        )(,)( uFSupInfuFSupInfTT pr ApCr pr CrAp ,  T                       )(,)( vFSupInfvFSupInf qr BqCr qr CrBq . So, we have FAB(x+ y) =             ,)( vuFSupInfTSup pq BqApyxvu             )( vuFSupInf pq ApBq                         )(,)( vuFSupInfvuFSupInfTSup pq BqBq pq BqAp yv xu =T                       ,)(,)( uFSupInfuFSupInfTSup pr ApCr pr CrApxu
  • 5. Probabilistic diameter and its properties www.ijmsi.org 44 | Page                        )(,)( uFSupInfuFSupInfTSup qr BpCr qr CrBpyv =T(FAC(x), FBC(y)). References: [1] R. Egbert, Cartesian products of statistical metric spaces, Amer. Math. Soc. Notices 10 (1963), 266-267. [2] V. Istratescu and I. Vaduva, Products of statistical metric spaces (Romanian), Acad. R. P. Romine Stud. Cerc. Mat. 12 (1961), 567-574. [3] K. Menger, Statistical metrics, Proc. Nat. Acad. Of Science. U.S.A. 28 (1942), 535-537. [4] K.Menger, Probabilistic geometry, Pro. Nat. Acad. Of Science. U.S.A. 37 (1951), 226-229. [5] K.Menger, Geometrie generale (Chap. VII), Memorial des Sciences Mathematiques, No. 124, Paris 1954. [6] B. Schweizer, Equivalence relations in probabilistic metric spaces, Bulletin of the Polytechnic Inst. Of Jassy 10 (1964), 67-70. *******