Running head WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT .docx

Running head: WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT
1
WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT
2
Week 3 Assignment-Case Study
Mary Arterberry
ABS 200: Introduction to Applied Behavioral Sciences
Instructor: Amber Keele
January 20, 2018
Week 3 Assignment: Case Study Selection
The discussion will be based on case study #1 that centers on
clinical psychology (major depressive disorder). From the case
study, Joe is a victim of severe depression, a mental disorder
that has been in his family but also attributed to the harsh
situations he has been in such as losing his job, divorce and
losing custody of his children. Depression is a serious mental
disorder that is silently consuming a significant percentage of
the world. “It encompasses the mood, thoughts, and body thus
interfering with the day-to-day life of the victim” (Thiele,
Laireiter, & Baumann, 2012). Depression can be looked at
critically from a clinical psychology perspective regarding the
causes, symptoms, prevention, and treatment.
Clinical psychologists attribute depressive disorder to a number
of factors. Cochran and Rabinowitz (2010) explain that there is
no single cause of the mental condition, but it is as a result of a

combination of biochemical, genetic, psychological, and
environmental factors. This is a claim that is datable in the
clinical psychology field where other psychologists explain
some instances of depression can be as a result of a specific
factor from the list of factors provided. This aspect of
depression can be applied to Joe’s case – the fact that his
biological parents and two of his uncles were victims of
depression proves Joe’s condition is as a result of genetic
attribution of the disorder – however, “the fact that his
depression only manifested after him losing his job and being
divorced is evident that depression is caused by a combination
of factors as explained by Cochran and Rabinowitz” (2010).
The advancement of technology in the clinical psychology field
indicate that depression is a disorder of the brain. Technologies
such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) used to image the
brain reveal that parts of the brain responsible for mood, sleep,
thinking, behavior, and appetite function abnormally.
Depression is twice as common in women than in men implying
that women suffer depression and are more likely to be
depressed than men. Studies indicate that the lifecycle,
biological, and hormonal changes among other factors in women
is associated with their higher rates of depression.
Depression can be cured in many ways including medication,
herbal therapy, and psychotherapy. All the methods are
effective, but the most recommended treatment method is
psychotherapy that involves sessions between a depressed
person and a psychotherapist for a defined period. The
condition can also be managed from the victim’s perspective
and that of the family members close to the victim and friends.
“This can be done through emotional and psychological support
to the patient to help them manage the condition” (Thiele,
Laireiter, & Baumann, 2012).
It is important to understand the essentials of clinical
psychology as it pertains to depression to help in situations of
depression. For instance, clinical psychology can be used to
evaluate Joe’s mental disorder and recommend effective

treatment methods to cure his depressive illness successfully.
Unlike other clinical treatment methods, incorporating
psychologists in managing Joe’s condition is advantageous
since it would look at the broader picture and include his family
(wife and kids) in treating the condition. However, clinical
psychology is a lengthy and tedious process and requires the
cooperation of people involved to be successful. This is the
main setback of clinical psychology.
References
Cochran, S. V., & Rabinowitz, F. E. (2010). Men and
depression. In Clinical and Empirical Perspectives. Academic
Press, San Diego.
Thiele, C., Laireiter, A. R., & Baumann, U. (2012). Diaries in
clinical psychology and psychotherapy: A selective
review. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 9(1), 1-37.
Week 5 - Final Paper
Applied Psychology: From Theory to Practice Final Paper
For your Final Paper assignment, you will demonstrate your
knowledge of applied behavioral science by utilizing
summarizing information you have learned throughout this
course.
Prepare: To begin, review the case study you selected in Week
Three of the course. Remember, you must use this case study.
Pay special attention to the topic you selected and the area from
which you will draw your research on the topic as noted in the
title of the case study. For example, if you selected Case Study
#1, you would explore the topic of Major Depressive Disorder
from the clinical psychology perspective. If you selected Case
Study #5, you would explore motivation from the industrial
organizational psychology perspective.
Reflect: Next, research the chosen topic using scholarly
resources, and craft a thesis statement regarding your selected
topic. For assistance with creating a thesis statement, utilize

the Thesis Generator (Links to an external site.)Links to an
external site. tool on the Ashford University Writing Center
website. Your final paper must contain at least six peer-
reviewed journal articles, published within the past 10 years,
which are cited according to APA style as outlined in the
Ashford Writing Center. Examples of peer reviewed journals
include, but are not limited to, the Journal of Applied
Behavioral Science, Journal of Applied Behavior
Analysis, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Behavioral
Interventions, The Behavior Analyst Today, Journal of Speech-
Language Pathology & Applied Behavior Analysis,and Journal
of Behavioral Education. Additional scholarly sources (e.g.,
information from government websites and professional
association websites) may be included over and above the
required six peer-reviewed journal articles. Popular sources
(Wikipedia, Newsweek, New York Times, Psychology
Today, About.com, PsychCentral.com, etc.) are not considered
peer-reviewed sources. For further assistance in determining
whether or not a source is a peer-reviewed journal article, be
sure to access the Scholarly and Popular Resources (Links to an
external site.)Links to an external site. tutorial on the Ashford
University Library website.
Write: In a well-developed eight- to ten-page paper address the
following criteria for the case study you selected in Week
Three. See the ABS200 Case Study List located in your online
classroom to review the case studies.
· The paper must begin with a well-written introduction that
includes a succinct thesis statement. For assistance with
creating a thesis statement, utilize the Thesis Generator (Links
to an external site.)Links to an external site. tool on the Ashford
University Writing Center website.
· Your introductory paragraph must include a description of the
basic characteristics of science and a definition of applied
behavioral science and the area of psychology from which the
case study is explored.
· Identify and describe the potential source(s) and/or cause(s) of

the issue that is/are relevant to the selected case study (e.g.,
genetic, environmental, social, cultural, organizational).
· Examine the case study by applying one psychological theory
of your choice pertinent to applied behavioral science.
· Describe scientific research that is relevant to your selected
case study. Include past and current findings and note any key
changes.
· Identify and describe any relevant trends in working with your
intended population.
· Detail a suggested plan of action, including advantages and
disadvantages, for moving forward.
· Specify what you would do to build rapport with the clients in
the selected case study.
· State ethical considerations that are relevant to this case.
· You must end your paper with a conclusion that reaffirms your
thesis and include an examination of the pros and cons
(advantages and disadvantages) of utilizing at least one applied
behavioral science intervention method to address the concerns
in the scenario you selected.
The Applied Psychology: From Theory to Practice Final Paper
· Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length (not
including title and references pages) and formatted according to
APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to
an external site.)Links to an external site..
· Must include a separate title page with the following:
· Title of paper
· Student’s name
· Course name and number
· Instructor’s name
· Date submitted
· Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct
thesis statement.
· Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. View
the Critical Thinking Community (Links to an external
site.)Links to an external site. website for further assistance.
· Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis and

summarizes supporting evidence.
· Must use at least six peer-reviewed journal articles as sources,
including a minimum of four from the Ashford University
Library.
· The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible
Sources (Links to an external site.)Links to an external
site. table offers additional guidance on appropriate source
types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is
appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor.
Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a
specific source for a particular assignment.
· Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the
Ashford Writing Center.
· Must include a separate references page that is formatted
according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing
Center.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external
site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used
to evaluate your assignment.
Description:
Total Possible Score: 22.00
Organization: Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Conclusion
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Paper is logically organized with a well-written
introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion.
Proficient - Paper is logically organized with an introduction,
thesis statement, and conclusion. One of these requires
improvement.
Basic - Paper is organized with an introduction, thesis
statement, and conclusion. One or more of the introduction,
thesis statement, and/or conclusion require improvement.
Below Expectations - Paper is loosely organized with an
introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. The introduction,
thesis statement, and/or conclusion require much improvement.

Non-Performance - The introduction, thesis statement, and
conclusion are either nonexistent or lack the components
described in the assignment instructions
Defines Applied Behavioral Science and the Area of Psychology
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively defines applied
behavioral science and the area of psychology from which the
case study is explored. The definition is fully supported with
scholarly sources.
Proficient - Defines applied behavioral science and the area of
psychology from which the case study is explored. The
definition is mostly supported with scholarly sources, but minor
details are missing or unclear.
Basic - Partially defines applied behavioral science and the area
of psychology from which the case study is explored. The
definition is minimally supported with scholarly sources and
relevant details are missing or unclear.
Below Expectations - Attempts to define applied behavioral
science and the area of psychology from which the case study is
explored, however, the definitions are not supported with
scholarly sources and/or significant details are missing or
unclear.
Non-Performance - The definition is either nonexistent or lack
the components described in the assignment instructions.
Identifies and Describes Source and/or Causation
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Correctly identifies and thoroughly describes
potential source(s) and/or cause(s) of the issue presented in the
case study.
Proficient - Identifies and describes potential source(s) and/or
cause(s) of the issue presented in the case study. Minor details
are missing or inaccurate.
Basic - Identifies and partially describes potential source(s)
and/or cause(s) of the issue presented in the case study.

Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations - Identifies and attempts to describe
potential source(s) and/or cause(s) of the issue presented in the
case study: however, significant details are missing and/or
inaccurate.
Non-Performance - The identification and description of
source(s) and/or cause(s) of the issue presented in the case
study are either nonexistent or lack the components described in
the assignment instructions.
Explains the Case Study by Applying one Psychological Theory
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains the
selected case study applying one psychological theory.
Proficient - Explains the selected case study applying one
psychological theory. Minor details are missing or unclear.
Basic - Minimally explains the selected case study applying one
psychological theory. Relevant details are missing or unclear.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the selected case
study; however, one psychological theory is not applied or
significant details are missing and/or unclear.
Non-Performance - The examination is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes Scientific Research That is Relevant to the Selected
Case Study
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively describes the scientific
research that is relevant to the selected case study thoroughly
including past and current findings noting key changes.
Proficient - Describes the scientific research that is relevant to
the selected case study including past and current findings
noting key changes. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially describes the scientific research that is relevant
to the selected case study minimally including past and current
findings noting key changes. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the scientific
research that is relevant to the selected case study; however,
does not include past and current findings noting key changes
and/or significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The description of the scientific research is
nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment
instructions.
Identifies and Describes Relevant Trends in Working With the
Intended Population
Total: 1.50
Distinguished - Clearly identifies and thoroughly describes fully
relevant trends in working with the population from the selected
case study.
Proficient - Identifies and describes relevant trends in working
with the population from the selected case study. Minor details
are missing or unclear.
Basic - Identifies and minimally describes somewhat relevant
trends in working with the population from the selected case
study. Relevant details are missing or unclear.
Below Expectations - Identifies and attempts to describe trends
in working with the population from the selected case study;
however, the trends are not relevant and/or significant details
are missing and/or unclear.
Non-Performance - The identification and description of
relevant trends in working with the population from the selected
case study is nonexistent or lacks the components described in
the assignment instructions.
Details a Suggested Plan of Action
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively details a suggested plan of
action for moving forward, fully including advantages and
disadvantages.
Proficient - Details a suggested plan of action for moving
forward, including advantages and disadvantages. Minor details

are missing.
Basic - Partially details a suggested plan of action for moving
forward minimally including advantages and disadvantages.
Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to detail a suggested plan of
action for moving forward; however, does not include
advantages and disadvantages and/or significant details are
missing.
Non-Performance - The detailing of a suggested plan of action
for moving forward is nonexistent or lacks the components
described in the assignment instructions.
Specifies What can be Done to Build Rapport With Clients in
the Selected Case Study
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly specifies what can be done to build
rapport with the clients in the selected case study.
Proficient - Specifies what can be done to build rapport with the
clients in the selected case study. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially specifies what can be done to build rapport
with the clients in the selected case study. Relevant details are
missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to specify what can be done to
build rapport with the clients in the selected case study;
however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The specification of what can be done to
build rapport with the clients in the selected case study is
nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment
instructions.
Applied Ethics: Ethical Issue Recognition
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - States ethical issues when presented in a
complex, ambiguous context AND can recognize
interrelationships among the various issues.
Proficient - States ethical issues when they are presented in an

ambiguous context OR can grasp cross-relationships among the
issues.
Basic - States basic and apparent ethical issues and understands
(incompletely) the complexities or interrelationships among the
issues.
Below Expectations - States apparent ethical issues but fails to
grasp complexity or interrelationships.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 0.75
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail
the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information
necessary for a full understanding.
Proficient - Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered,
delivering enough relevant information for an adequate
understanding.
Basic - Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering
minimal information for a basic understanding.
Below Expectations - Briefly recognizes the issue to be
considered, but may not deliver additional information
necessary for a basic understanding.
Written Communication: Content Development
Total: 0.75
Distinguished - Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive
content to discover and develop sophisticated ideas within the
context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Proficient - Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover
ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a
whole.
Basic - Uses appropriate and pertinent content, but does not
apply it toward discovering or developing ideas. Overall,

content assists in shaping the written work.
Below Expectations - Uses content, though it may be unrelated
or inappropriate to the topic. Content does not contribute
toward the development of the written work, and may distract
the reader from its purpose.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.75
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and
organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and
grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to
understand.
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax
and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work
contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to
understand.
Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics,
such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few
errors, which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of
syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written
work contains major errors, which distract the reader.
APA Formatting
Total: 0.75
Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently
throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper.
However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic - Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout
the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA

formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout
difficult to distinguish as APA.
Page Requirement
Total: 0.75
Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the
required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the
required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three
quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at
least one half of the required number of correctly formatted
pages.
Resource Requirement
Total: 0.75
Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of
scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support
ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited
correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient - Uses required number of scholarly sources to
support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and
cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support
ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the
reference page are used within the body of the assignment.
Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations - Uses inadequate number of sources that
provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be
scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used
within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted

correctly.
Non-Performance -The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks
the components described in the instructions.

Running head WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT .docx

More Related Content

Similar to Running head WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT .docx (20)

More from toltonkendal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Running head WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT .docx