SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Smp2 part b policy statements newport-usk only_final

S
Severn Estuary

This document summarizes the local coastal management plan for an area along the Severn Estuary in South Wales, including the city of Newport. It outlines 5 policy units - NEW 1 to NEW 5 - and describes the preferred coastal management policies for each over the next 100 years to balance flood risk management with nature conservation and development needs. The key drivers are international nature sites, critical infrastructure like railways and ports, and residential areas. For units NEW 1 and NEW 2, which border Newport, the preferred long-term policy is to "Hold the Line" and maintain existing flood defenses to protect properties and infrastructure. For unit NEW 3 along the River Usk, the plan shifts to "No Active Intervention" and then "Managed

Environment
1 of 17
Download to read offline
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 1 NEWPORT AND THE RIVER USK This Theme area contains the Policy Units NEW 1, NEW 2, NEW 3 NEW 4 and NEW 5. It starts on the River Ebbw (east bank) at the Maesglas railway bridge, and ends on the River Usk at Spytty Pill, north of the A48 crossing. The Key Policy Drivers in this area are: • International nature conservation sites – Severn Estuary SAC, SPA and Ramsar, River Usk SAC; • Critical infrastructure – railway line, electricity substations, docks, M4; • Residential developments – Newport and the outskirts of Newport.
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 2
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 3 Policy Unit: NEW 1 – River Ebbw (east bank) at Maesglas Railway Bridge to River Usk at the transporter bridge (west bank)
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 4 Preferred Policies to Implement the Plan: Epoch Preferred Policy Comments 0 to 20 years (2025) HTL The short term policy for this unit is Hold The Line The existing defences will come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch. HTL recommends that defences are replaced. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. The position and height of new defences should be considered in more detail by the SEFRMS. The SEFRMS will consider combined risks from the sea (SMP2 policy) and the river (CFMP policy - take actions to maintain flood risk at existing level, accepting that risks will increase over time – see Section 3.4 SMP2-CFMP interactions). Actions should take account of potential impacts in the linked Policy Unit (NEW 2) HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to Newport docks, their operation and local areas. Navigation dredging near to Newport docks is expected to continue. HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 20 to 50 years (2055) HTL The medium term policy for this unit is Hold The Line Defences are likely to have been reconstructed in the previous epoch and should be maintained. HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to Newport docks, their operation and local areas. Navigation dredging near to Newport docks is expected to continue. HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 50 to 100 years (2105) HTL The long term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Defences should be maintained. HTL will manage the risk of flooding to Newport docks, their operation and local areas. Navigation dredging near to Newport docks is expected to continue. HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. Economics Policy Unit Existing SMP1 Policy Time Period (epoch) SMP2 Assessment 0- 20 20- 50 50- 100 Preferred Plan Present Value Damages Preferred Plan Present Value Defence Costs NEW 1 HTL HTL HTL HTL £177m (NEW1-2 total) £9m (NEW1-2 total) The preferred policy is economically viable for the linked Policy Units of NEW 1 and NEW 2. The costs and damages of the preferred policy in the table above relate to actions taken in all linked policy units.
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 5 Predicted Implication of the Preferred Plan for the NEW 1 Policy Unit Time Period Management Activities Property, Land Use and Human Health Nature Conservation – including Earth Heritage, Geology and Biodiversity Landscape Character and Visual Amenity Historic Environment Amenity and Recreational Use 0 – 20 years Existing earth embankment defences are expected to come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch and will need to be replaced. Maintenance may prolong the life of defences into the next epoch. Recently replaced defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. Defences will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to existing property and land use. A HTL policy will not impact the nature conservation sites during this time period. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Defences are likely to come to the end of their serviceable life and require reconstruction in this epoch. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to the historic environment. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on the amenity value of the land. 20 – 50 years Defences are likely to have been reconstructed in the previous epoch and should be maintained. If they have not already been reconstructed, they will need to be re-built in this epoch. Defences will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to existing property and land use. A HTL policy will not impact the Usk N2K site during this time period. Potential for coastal squeeze for Severn N2K. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to the historic environment. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on the amenity value of the land 50 – 100 years An on-going maintenance programme should be established including the monitoring of shoreline erosion as sea level rise increases. Defences will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to existing property and land use. A HTL policy will not impact the Usk N2K site. Potential for coastal squeeze for Severn N2K. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to the historic environment. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on the amenity value of the land
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 6 Policy Unit: NEW 2 - River Usk at the transporter bridge (west bank) to River Usk at M4 crossing (west bank)
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 7 Preferred Policies to Implement the Plan: Epoch Preferred Policy Comments 0 to 20 years (2025) HTL The short term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. The existing defences will come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch. HTL recommends that defences are replaced. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. High ground limits the risk of flooding in some areas. The position and height of new defences should be considered in more detail by the SEFRMS. The SEFRMS will consider combined risks from the sea (SMP2 policy) and the river (CFMP policy - take actions to maintain flood risk at existing level, accepting that risks will increase over time – see Section 3.4 SMP2-CFMP interactions). Actions should take account of potential impacts in the linked Policy Unit (NEW 1). HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to residential areas of Newport. HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 20 to 50 years (2055) HTL The medium term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Defences are likely to have been reconstructed in the previous epoch and should be maintained. HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to residential areas of Newport. HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 50 to 100 years (2105) HTL The long term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Defences should be maintained. HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to residential areas of Newport. HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. Economics Policy Unit Existing SMP1 Policy Time Period (epoch) SMP2 Assessment 0- 20 20- 50 50- 100 Preferred Plan Present Value Damages Preferred Plan Present Value Defence Costs NEW 2 HTL HTL HTL HTL £177m (NEW1-2 total) £9m (NEW1-2 total) The preferred policy is economically viable for the linked Policy Units of NEW 1 and NEW 2. The costs and damages of the preferred policy in the table above relate to actions taken in all linked policy units.
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 8 Predicted Implication of the Preferred Plan for the NEW 2 Policy Unit Time Period Management Activities Property, Land Use and Human Health Nature Conservation – including Earth Heritage, Geology and Biodiversity Landscape Character and Visual Amenity Historic Environment Amenity and Recreational Use 0 – 20 years The current earth embankment defences are expected to come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch and should be replaced when appropriate. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. Limited flood risk to existing property and land use exists due to high ground where low lying ground exacerbates flood risk, defences will mitigate against potential impacts A HTL policy will not impact the nature conservation sites during this time period. Usk N2K site unaffected. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Defences are likely to come to the end of their serviceable life and require reconstruction in this epoch. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to the historic environment. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on the amenity value of the land. 20 – 50 years An on-going maintenance programme should be established including the monitoring of shoreline erosion as sea level rise increases. Limited flood risk to existing property and land use exists due to high ground where low lying ground exacerbates flood risk; defences will manage the risk of flooding to property and land. A HTL policy will not impact the nature conservation sites during this time period. Usk N2K site unaffected. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to the historic environment. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on the amenity value of the land 50 – 100 years An on-going maintenance programme should be established including the monitoring of shoreline erosion as sea level rise increases. Limited flood risk to existing property and land use exists due to high ground where low lying ground exacerbates flood risk; defences will manage the risk of flooding to property and land. A HTL policy will not impact the nature conservation sites during this time period. Usk N2K site unaffected. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to the historic environment. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on the amenity value of the land
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 9 Policy Unit: NEW 3 - River Usk (both banks) from M4 crossing to Newbridge on Usk
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 10 Preferred Policies to Implement the Plan: Epoch Preferred Policy Comments 0 to 20 years (2025) NAI The short term policy for this unit is No Active Intervention. Defences will remain in place in this epoch. Defences should be monitored to ensure they do not pose a risk to H&S under NAI or impact on CFMP policy (take actions to reduce flood risk) (see Section 3.4 on SMP2-CFMP interactions). Individual defences planned around Home Farm, Caerleon are specific to the development and do not impact on wider coastal processes. This Policy Unit is not linked to any others in terms of tidal flood risk. 20 to 50 years (2055) NAI The medium term policy for this unit is No Active Intervention. Defences are expected to come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch, leading to frequent but isolated tidal flooding of the valley, mainly of agricultural land. Historic environment assets, e.g. Caerleon will be at increased risk of impacts – mitigation and adaptation actions should be considered. Defences should be monitored to ensure they do not pose a risk to H&S under NAI or impact on CFMP policy (take actions to reduce flood risk) (see Section 3.4 on SMP2-CFMP interactions). This Policy Unit is not linked to any others in terms of tidal flood risk. 50 to 100 years (2105) MR The long term policy for this unit is Managed Realignment. New, realigned defences should be built. The position, size and materials of new defences should be considered in detail to ensure MR does not impact on CFMP policy (take actions to reduce flood risk) (see Section 3.4 on SMP2-CFMP interactions). MR manages the risk of impacts from flooding and erosion to assets behind the new defences. Land, nature conservation and historic environment features in front of the new line of defences will be at increased risk of flooding and erosion - adaptation actions should be considered and implemented. This Policy Unit is not linked to any others in terms of tidal flood risk. MR does not guarantee funding to build new realigned defences. Economics Policy Unit Existing SMP1 Policy Time Period (epoch) SMP2 Assessment 0- 20 20- 50 50- 100 Damages and Benefits Assumed Defence Works and Costs NEW 3 N/A NAI NAI MR £1M £0.4M The preferred policy is economically viable for this unit, but the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) is low. Where the BCR is low, schemes may be less likely to receive public funding and it may be necessary to find funding from other sources.
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 11 Predicted Implication of the Preferred Plan for the NEW 3 Policy Unit Time Period Management Activities Property, Land Use and Human Health Nature Conservation – including Earth Heritage, Geology and Biodiversity Landscape Character and Visual Amenity Historic Environment Amenity and Recreational Use 0 – 20 years The existing defences will remain in place with no active intervention preventing isolated flooding of agricultural land. Present defences will remain in place reducing the risk of flooding to properties and land. There will be limited impact in this epoch as the existing defence line will continue to protect the area from flood and erosion risk. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on existing landscape and visual amenity. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The established defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets. 20 – 50 years The current defences are expected to come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch, a no active intervention policy should continue. Actions may be needed to limit fluvial flooding (CFMP policy) Following failure of the defences flooding to agricultural land can be expected. No impact to national and internationally designated nature conservation sites. Failed defences and more frequent flooding will alter the existing landscape characteristics through the possible abandonment of present agricultural practices within the floodplain. Failure of the defences will increase flood risk to the historic environment. Following failure of the defences flooding to amenity and recreational assets may be increased. 50 – 100 years A Realigned defence line should be established and maintained throughout the epoch to prevent an increased flood risk. Further flood risk to residential properties and other assets is prevented by realignment of the defences. Managed realignment could offer opportunities to enhance designated sites and biodiversity. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. The area to the front of the new defence line will be subject to more frequent flooding, resulting in abandonment of present agricultural practices within the floodplain; landscape type will begin to change to intertidal. Realigned defences will protect historic environment behind new defences. Historic assets in front of realigned defences will be at risk from inundation. Impacts on historic environment and mitigation actions will need to be considered in determining realignment of defences. Further flood risk to amenity and recreational assets will be prevented by realignment of the defences.
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 12 Policy Unit: NEW 4 - River Usk (east bank) at M4 crossing to Spytty Pill (north of A48 crossing)
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 13 Preferred Policies to Implement the Plan: Epoch Preferred Policy Comments 0 to 20 years (2025) HTL The short term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. The existing defences will come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch. HTL recommends that defences are replaced. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. The position and height of new defences should be considered in more detail by the SEFRMS. The SEFRMS will consider combined risks from the sea (SMP2 policy) and the river (CFMP policy - take actions to reduce flood risk – see Section 3.4 SMP2-CFMP interactions). HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to residential, commercial and industrial assets in this and linked Policy Units (NEW5, CALD 1). HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 20 to 50 years (2055) HTL The medium term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Reconstructed defences should be maintained. Actions should not impact on CFMP policy - take actions to reduce flood risk – see Section 3.4 SMP2- CFMP interactions). HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding residential, commercial and industrial assets in this and linked Policy Units (NEW5, CALD 1). HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 50 to 100 years (2105) HTL The long term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Reconstructed defences should be maintained. Actions should not impact on CFMP policy - take actions to reduce flood risk – see Section 3.4 SMP2- CFMP interactions). HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding residential, commercial and industrial assets in this and linked Policy Units (NEW5, CALD 1). HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. Economics Policy Unit Existing SMP1 Policy Time Period (epoch) SMP2 Assessment 0- 20 20- 50 50- 100 Preferred Plan Present Value Damages Preferred Plan Present Value Defence Costs NEW 4 HTL HTL HTL HTL £1,135m (NEW4-5, CALD1 total) £37m (NEW4-5, CALD1 total) The preferred policy is economically viable for the linked Policy Units of NEW 4, NEW 5, and CALD 1. The costs and damages of the preferred policy in the table above relate to actions taken in all linked policy units.
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 14 Predicted Implication of the Preferred Plan for the NEW 4 Policy Unit Time Period Management Activities Property, Land Use and Human Health Nature Conservation – including Earth Heritage, Geology and Biodiversity Landscape Character and Visual Amenity Historic Environment Amenity and Recreational Use 0 – 20 years The existing defences are expected to come to the end of their serviceable life and will need to be replaced in this epoch. Following replacement a monitoring and maintenance programme should be established. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to existing properties and land use of this and adjacent units will be protected from increased risk of flooding and erosion. No detrimental impact from existing condition of national and internationally designated nature conservation sites. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Defences are likely to come to the end of their serviceable life and require reconstruction in this epoch. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets. 20 – 50 years The monitoring and maintenance programme should continue. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to existing properties and land use of this and adjacent units will be protected from increased risk of flooding and erosion. No detrimental impact from existing condition of national and internationally designated nature conservation sites. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets. 50 – 100 years The monitoring and maintenance programme should continue. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to existing properties and land use of this and adjacent units will be protected from increased risk of flooding and erosion. No detrimental impact from existing condition of national and internationally designated nature conservation sites. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets.
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 15 Policy Unit: NEW 5 - River Usk (East bank) at Spytty Pill (North of A48 crossing) to Uskmouth Power Station point
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 16 Preferred Policies to Implement the Plan: Epoch Preferred Policy Comments 0 to 20 years (2025) HTL The short term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. The existing defences will come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch. HTL recommends that defences are replaced. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. The position, size and materials of new defences should be considered in detail by the SEFRMS. The SEFRMS will consider combined risks from the sea (SMP2 policy) and the river (CFMP policy - take actions to reduce flood risk – see Section 3.4 SMP2-CFMP interactions). HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding residential, commercial and industrial assets in this and linked Policy Units (NEW4, CALD 1). HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 20 to 50 years (2055) HTL The medium term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Reconstructed defences should be maintained. Actions should not impact on CFMP policy (take actions to reduce flood risk - see Section 3.4). HTL will manage risk of impacts from flooding residential, commercial and industrial assets in this and linked Policy Units (NEW4, CALD 1). HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 50 to 100 years (2105) HTL The long term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Reconstructed defences should be maintained. Actions should not impact on CFMP policy (take actions to reduce flood risk - see Section 3.4). HTL will manage risk of impacts from flooding residential, commercial and industrial assets in this and linked Policy Units (NEW4, CALD 1). HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. Economics Policy Unit Existing SMP1 Policy Time Period (epoch) SMP2 Assessment 0- 20 20- 50 50- 100 Preferred Plan Present Value Damages Preferred Plan Present Value Defence Costs NEW 5 HTL HTL HTL HTL £1,135m (NEW4-5, CALD1 total) £37m (NEW4-5, CALD1 total) The preferred policy is economically viable for the linked Policy Units of NEW 4, NEW 5, and CALD 1. The costs and damages of the preferred policy in the table above relate to actions taken in all linked policy units.
The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 17 Predicted Implication of the Preferred Plan for the NEW 5 Policy Unit Time Period Management Activities Property, Land Use and Human Health Nature Conservation – including Earth Heritage, Geology and Biodiversity Landscape Character and Visual Amenity Historic Environment Amenity and Recreational Use 0 – 20 years The existing defences are expected to come to the end of their serviceable life and will need to be replaced in this epoch. Following replacement a monitoring and maintenance programme should be established. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to existing properties and land use of this and adjacent units will be protected from increased risk of flooding and erosion. A HTL policy will not impact the River Usk SAC/SSSI during this time period. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Defences are likely to come to the end of their serviceable life and require reconstruction in this epoch. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets. 20 – 50 years The monitoring and maintenance programme should continue. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to existing properties and land use of this and adjacent units will be protected from increased risk of flooding and erosion. River Usk SAC/SSSI will remain unaffected. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets. 50 – 100 years The monitoring and maintenance programme should continue. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to existing properties and land use of this and adjacent units will be protected from increased risk of flooding and erosion. River Usk SAC/SSSI will remain unaffected. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets.

More Related Content

PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements tidenham only_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements wentlooge only_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements sharpness-sev cross only_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements portishead only_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements glos-haw bridge only_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements caldicot only_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements lydney-glos only_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements cardiff only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part b policy statements tidenham only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part b policy statements wentlooge only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part b policy statements sharpness-sev cross only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part b policy statements portishead only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part b policy statements glos-haw bridge only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part b policy statements caldicot only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part b policy statements lydney-glos only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part b policy statements cardiff only_final
Severn Estuary
 

What's hot (15)

PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements glos-sharpness only_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements bristol only_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements chepstow-wye only_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements intro sections_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Smp2 part c action plan final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Appendix g preferred management approach testing final_dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Appendix i part b _hra_final_dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Appendix h economics final dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
US Navy Instruction Confirms Retirement of Nuclear Tomahawk Cruise Missile
Daniel Ross
 
PDF
Flood erosioncontrolfs4
Jeenn Cano
 
PPT
Cleaning Up Munitions
Bill Frank
 
PDF
Draft Bill to Extend SAFETEA-LU for Six Months
Ports-To-Plains Blog
 
DOC
Burns Military Bio
Robear719
 
PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements holms only_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Phases Of An Event Of Scale
Bob Prieto
 
Smp2 part b policy statements glos-sharpness only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part b policy statements bristol only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part b policy statements chepstow-wye only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part b policy statements intro sections_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part c action plan final
Severn Estuary
 
Appendix g preferred management approach testing final_dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
Appendix i part b _hra_final_dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
Appendix h economics final dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
US Navy Instruction Confirms Retirement of Nuclear Tomahawk Cruise Missile
Daniel Ross
 
Flood erosioncontrolfs4
Jeenn Cano
 
Cleaning Up Munitions
Bill Frank
 
Draft Bill to Extend SAFETEA-LU for Six Months
Ports-To-Plains Blog
 
Burns Military Bio
Robear719
 
Smp2 part b policy statements holms only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Phases Of An Event Of Scale
Bob Prieto
 
Ad

Viewers also liked (6)

PDF
Anonio viviano 3d illustration
Antonio Viviano
 
PPTX
Factibilidades
deny lama
 
PPTX
Redes inalambricas
emiliovillacisb
 
DOCX
eslam mohamed helmy
eslam helmy
 
PDF
Westhampton Dean Document
Leah Doghramji
 
PPTX
El deporte
Esteebaan23
 
Anonio viviano 3d illustration
Antonio Viviano
 
Factibilidades
deny lama
 
Redes inalambricas
emiliovillacisb
 
eslam mohamed helmy
eslam helmy
 
Westhampton Dean Document
Leah Doghramji
 
El deporte
Esteebaan23
 
Ad

Similar to Smp2 part b policy statements newport-usk only_final (20)

PDF
Smp2 part b policy statements kingston seymour only_final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Smp2 part a main report final
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Appendix d theme review final_dec2010a
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Community engagement on adaptation to sea level change
Neil Dufty
 
PDF
Appendix f policy development and appraisal final_dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
DOCX
DEIR Resiliency Plan San Tim Canyon
Brian Robey
 
PDF
backgrounder_lmfls
Jessica Shoubridge
 
PDF
Climate Change Impact On Cliff Instability And Erosion
Roger_Moore
 
PDF
NAP Expo 2015 Session III, II Ecosystem-based Adaptation in the Pacific Islands
NAP Events
 
PDF
Appendix i part a sea_final_dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Disaster risk management in cambodia
Thành Nguyễn
 
PPTX
Analysis of life cycle costs - Roseau Dam - final project
PaulaBauwens
 
DOCX
Flood management systems
CKMCforstudents
 
PDF
2012 06 Bristol Channel Strategic Coastal Group – Shoreline and Flood Risk Ma...
SevernEstuary
 
PDF
Appendix e issues and features final_dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Climate Change Adaptation Strategy
Turlough Guerin GAICD FGIA
 
PDF
Appendix j wfd assessment final_dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
PDF
Verity rollason full paper 2
slamet01
 
PDF
Climate Tipping Points and the Insurance Sector
Open Knowledge
 
PPT
2009 06 Department of Energy and Climate Change - Juliet Austin
SevernEstuary
 
Smp2 part b policy statements kingston seymour only_final
Severn Estuary
 
Smp2 part a main report final
Severn Estuary
 
Appendix d theme review final_dec2010a
Severn Estuary
 
Community engagement on adaptation to sea level change
Neil Dufty
 
Appendix f policy development and appraisal final_dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
DEIR Resiliency Plan San Tim Canyon
Brian Robey
 
backgrounder_lmfls
Jessica Shoubridge
 
Climate Change Impact On Cliff Instability And Erosion
Roger_Moore
 
NAP Expo 2015 Session III, II Ecosystem-based Adaptation in the Pacific Islands
NAP Events
 
Appendix i part a sea_final_dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
Disaster risk management in cambodia
Thành Nguyễn
 
Analysis of life cycle costs - Roseau Dam - final project
PaulaBauwens
 
Flood management systems
CKMCforstudents
 
2012 06 Bristol Channel Strategic Coastal Group – Shoreline and Flood Risk Ma...
SevernEstuary
 
Appendix e issues and features final_dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
Climate Change Adaptation Strategy
Turlough Guerin GAICD FGIA
 
Appendix j wfd assessment final_dec2010
Severn Estuary
 
Verity rollason full paper 2
slamet01
 
Climate Tipping Points and the Insurance Sector
Open Knowledge
 
2009 06 Department of Energy and Climate Change - Juliet Austin
SevernEstuary
 

Recently uploaded (20)

DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Digester Tank Wastewater Treatment Integral to biog...
AllenLin596164
 
PPTX
AUTO IRRIGATION USING GRID SYSTEM123.pptx
ajha73032
 
PPTX
RadiationSafetyPt120252026nucchemis.pptx
ChrisPatron4
 
PDF
FMM Slides For OSH Management Requirement
ssuserf062ce
 
PDF
Tree Biomechanics, a concise presentation
ssaur
 
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Anaerobic Digesters Essential for capturing and sto...
AllenLin596164
 
PPTX
Afro-Asia Literature.pptxmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
rossanthonytan1
 
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Bio CNG Plants Stores biogas.docx
AllenLin596164
 
PPTX
Minor Species of nutmeg, cinnamon and clove
Vandana472475
 
PPTX
TERI-Lighting-the-Way-to-a-Sustainable-Future.pptx
drniharikasingh26
 
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Biogas Tanks Securely store produced biogas.docx
AllenLin596164
 
PPTX
"One Earth Celebrating World Environment Day"
anandy7345
 
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Bio-gas Tanks Reliable containment for biofuel gas....
AllenLin596164
 
PPTX
NSTP1 NSTP1NSTP1NSTP1NSTP1NSTP1NSTP1NSTP
waazzii000
 
PDF
Ornithology-Basic-Concepts.pdf..........
dayanidhi8115
 
PPTX
Microbial-Pathogens-and-Parasites-Their-Impact-on-Plant-Health.pptx
SharmithaSaravanan
 
PPTX
sustainable-development in tech-ppt[1].pptx
agrawalnaman320
 
PDF
Cave Diggers Simplified cave survey methods and mapping
NoelEbrole1
 
DOCX
The Ripple Effect: Understanding Extreme Weather Patterns and Geomagnetic Dyn...
kutatomoshi
 
PPTX
Corporate Social Responsibility & Governance
mhelr0se
 
Double Membrane Roofs for Digester Tank Wastewater Treatment Integral to biog...
AllenLin596164
 
AUTO IRRIGATION USING GRID SYSTEM123.pptx
ajha73032
 
RadiationSafetyPt120252026nucchemis.pptx
ChrisPatron4
 
FMM Slides For OSH Management Requirement
ssuserf062ce
 
Tree Biomechanics, a concise presentation
ssaur
 
Double Membrane Roofs for Anaerobic Digesters Essential for capturing and sto...
AllenLin596164
 
Afro-Asia Literature.pptxmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
rossanthonytan1
 
Double Membrane Roofs for Bio CNG Plants Stores biogas.docx
AllenLin596164
 
Minor Species of nutmeg, cinnamon and clove
Vandana472475
 
TERI-Lighting-the-Way-to-a-Sustainable-Future.pptx
drniharikasingh26
 
Double Membrane Roofs for Biogas Tanks Securely store produced biogas.docx
AllenLin596164
 
"One Earth Celebrating World Environment Day"
anandy7345
 
Double Membrane Roofs for Bio-gas Tanks Reliable containment for biofuel gas....
AllenLin596164
 
NSTP1 NSTP1NSTP1NSTP1NSTP1NSTP1NSTP1NSTP
waazzii000
 
Ornithology-Basic-Concepts.pdf..........
dayanidhi8115
 
Microbial-Pathogens-and-Parasites-Their-Impact-on-Plant-Health.pptx
SharmithaSaravanan
 
sustainable-development in tech-ppt[1].pptx
agrawalnaman320
 
Cave Diggers Simplified cave survey methods and mapping
NoelEbrole1
 
The Ripple Effect: Understanding Extreme Weather Patterns and Geomagnetic Dyn...
kutatomoshi
 
Corporate Social Responsibility & Governance
mhelr0se
 

Smp2 part b policy statements newport-usk only_final

  • 1. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 1 NEWPORT AND THE RIVER USK This Theme area contains the Policy Units NEW 1, NEW 2, NEW 3 NEW 4 and NEW 5. It starts on the River Ebbw (east bank) at the Maesglas railway bridge, and ends on the River Usk at Spytty Pill, north of the A48 crossing. The Key Policy Drivers in this area are: • International nature conservation sites – Severn Estuary SAC, SPA and Ramsar, River Usk SAC; • Critical infrastructure – railway line, electricity substations, docks, M4; • Residential developments – Newport and the outskirts of Newport.
  • 2. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 2
  • 3. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 3 Policy Unit: NEW 1 – River Ebbw (east bank) at Maesglas Railway Bridge to River Usk at the transporter bridge (west bank)
  • 4. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 4 Preferred Policies to Implement the Plan: Epoch Preferred Policy Comments 0 to 20 years (2025) HTL The short term policy for this unit is Hold The Line The existing defences will come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch. HTL recommends that defences are replaced. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. The position and height of new defences should be considered in more detail by the SEFRMS. The SEFRMS will consider combined risks from the sea (SMP2 policy) and the river (CFMP policy - take actions to maintain flood risk at existing level, accepting that risks will increase over time – see Section 3.4 SMP2-CFMP interactions). Actions should take account of potential impacts in the linked Policy Unit (NEW 2) HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to Newport docks, their operation and local areas. Navigation dredging near to Newport docks is expected to continue. HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 20 to 50 years (2055) HTL The medium term policy for this unit is Hold The Line Defences are likely to have been reconstructed in the previous epoch and should be maintained. HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to Newport docks, their operation and local areas. Navigation dredging near to Newport docks is expected to continue. HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 50 to 100 years (2105) HTL The long term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Defences should be maintained. HTL will manage the risk of flooding to Newport docks, their operation and local areas. Navigation dredging near to Newport docks is expected to continue. HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. Economics Policy Unit Existing SMP1 Policy Time Period (epoch) SMP2 Assessment 0- 20 20- 50 50- 100 Preferred Plan Present Value Damages Preferred Plan Present Value Defence Costs NEW 1 HTL HTL HTL HTL £177m (NEW1-2 total) £9m (NEW1-2 total) The preferred policy is economically viable for the linked Policy Units of NEW 1 and NEW 2. The costs and damages of the preferred policy in the table above relate to actions taken in all linked policy units.
  • 5. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 5 Predicted Implication of the Preferred Plan for the NEW 1 Policy Unit Time Period Management Activities Property, Land Use and Human Health Nature Conservation – including Earth Heritage, Geology and Biodiversity Landscape Character and Visual Amenity Historic Environment Amenity and Recreational Use 0 – 20 years Existing earth embankment defences are expected to come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch and will need to be replaced. Maintenance may prolong the life of defences into the next epoch. Recently replaced defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. Defences will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to existing property and land use. A HTL policy will not impact the nature conservation sites during this time period. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Defences are likely to come to the end of their serviceable life and require reconstruction in this epoch. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to the historic environment. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on the amenity value of the land. 20 – 50 years Defences are likely to have been reconstructed in the previous epoch and should be maintained. If they have not already been reconstructed, they will need to be re-built in this epoch. Defences will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to existing property and land use. A HTL policy will not impact the Usk N2K site during this time period. Potential for coastal squeeze for Severn N2K. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to the historic environment. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on the amenity value of the land 50 – 100 years An on-going maintenance programme should be established including the monitoring of shoreline erosion as sea level rise increases. Defences will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to existing property and land use. A HTL policy will not impact the Usk N2K site. Potential for coastal squeeze for Severn N2K. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to the historic environment. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on the amenity value of the land
  • 6. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 6 Policy Unit: NEW 2 - River Usk at the transporter bridge (west bank) to River Usk at M4 crossing (west bank)
  • 7. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 7 Preferred Policies to Implement the Plan: Epoch Preferred Policy Comments 0 to 20 years (2025) HTL The short term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. The existing defences will come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch. HTL recommends that defences are replaced. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. High ground limits the risk of flooding in some areas. The position and height of new defences should be considered in more detail by the SEFRMS. The SEFRMS will consider combined risks from the sea (SMP2 policy) and the river (CFMP policy - take actions to maintain flood risk at existing level, accepting that risks will increase over time – see Section 3.4 SMP2-CFMP interactions). Actions should take account of potential impacts in the linked Policy Unit (NEW 1). HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to residential areas of Newport. HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 20 to 50 years (2055) HTL The medium term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Defences are likely to have been reconstructed in the previous epoch and should be maintained. HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to residential areas of Newport. HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 50 to 100 years (2105) HTL The long term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Defences should be maintained. HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to residential areas of Newport. HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. Economics Policy Unit Existing SMP1 Policy Time Period (epoch) SMP2 Assessment 0- 20 20- 50 50- 100 Preferred Plan Present Value Damages Preferred Plan Present Value Defence Costs NEW 2 HTL HTL HTL HTL £177m (NEW1-2 total) £9m (NEW1-2 total) The preferred policy is economically viable for the linked Policy Units of NEW 1 and NEW 2. The costs and damages of the preferred policy in the table above relate to actions taken in all linked policy units.
  • 8. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 8 Predicted Implication of the Preferred Plan for the NEW 2 Policy Unit Time Period Management Activities Property, Land Use and Human Health Nature Conservation – including Earth Heritage, Geology and Biodiversity Landscape Character and Visual Amenity Historic Environment Amenity and Recreational Use 0 – 20 years The current earth embankment defences are expected to come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch and should be replaced when appropriate. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. Limited flood risk to existing property and land use exists due to high ground where low lying ground exacerbates flood risk, defences will mitigate against potential impacts A HTL policy will not impact the nature conservation sites during this time period. Usk N2K site unaffected. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Defences are likely to come to the end of their serviceable life and require reconstruction in this epoch. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to the historic environment. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on the amenity value of the land. 20 – 50 years An on-going maintenance programme should be established including the monitoring of shoreline erosion as sea level rise increases. Limited flood risk to existing property and land use exists due to high ground where low lying ground exacerbates flood risk; defences will manage the risk of flooding to property and land. A HTL policy will not impact the nature conservation sites during this time period. Usk N2K site unaffected. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to the historic environment. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on the amenity value of the land 50 – 100 years An on-going maintenance programme should be established including the monitoring of shoreline erosion as sea level rise increases. Limited flood risk to existing property and land use exists due to high ground where low lying ground exacerbates flood risk; defences will manage the risk of flooding to property and land. A HTL policy will not impact the nature conservation sites during this time period. Usk N2K site unaffected. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to the historic environment. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on the amenity value of the land
  • 9. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 9 Policy Unit: NEW 3 - River Usk (both banks) from M4 crossing to Newbridge on Usk
  • 10. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 10 Preferred Policies to Implement the Plan: Epoch Preferred Policy Comments 0 to 20 years (2025) NAI The short term policy for this unit is No Active Intervention. Defences will remain in place in this epoch. Defences should be monitored to ensure they do not pose a risk to H&S under NAI or impact on CFMP policy (take actions to reduce flood risk) (see Section 3.4 on SMP2-CFMP interactions). Individual defences planned around Home Farm, Caerleon are specific to the development and do not impact on wider coastal processes. This Policy Unit is not linked to any others in terms of tidal flood risk. 20 to 50 years (2055) NAI The medium term policy for this unit is No Active Intervention. Defences are expected to come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch, leading to frequent but isolated tidal flooding of the valley, mainly of agricultural land. Historic environment assets, e.g. Caerleon will be at increased risk of impacts – mitigation and adaptation actions should be considered. Defences should be monitored to ensure they do not pose a risk to H&S under NAI or impact on CFMP policy (take actions to reduce flood risk) (see Section 3.4 on SMP2-CFMP interactions). This Policy Unit is not linked to any others in terms of tidal flood risk. 50 to 100 years (2105) MR The long term policy for this unit is Managed Realignment. New, realigned defences should be built. The position, size and materials of new defences should be considered in detail to ensure MR does not impact on CFMP policy (take actions to reduce flood risk) (see Section 3.4 on SMP2-CFMP interactions). MR manages the risk of impacts from flooding and erosion to assets behind the new defences. Land, nature conservation and historic environment features in front of the new line of defences will be at increased risk of flooding and erosion - adaptation actions should be considered and implemented. This Policy Unit is not linked to any others in terms of tidal flood risk. MR does not guarantee funding to build new realigned defences. Economics Policy Unit Existing SMP1 Policy Time Period (epoch) SMP2 Assessment 0- 20 20- 50 50- 100 Damages and Benefits Assumed Defence Works and Costs NEW 3 N/A NAI NAI MR £1M £0.4M The preferred policy is economically viable for this unit, but the benefit-cost ratio (BCR) is low. Where the BCR is low, schemes may be less likely to receive public funding and it may be necessary to find funding from other sources.
  • 11. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 11 Predicted Implication of the Preferred Plan for the NEW 3 Policy Unit Time Period Management Activities Property, Land Use and Human Health Nature Conservation – including Earth Heritage, Geology and Biodiversity Landscape Character and Visual Amenity Historic Environment Amenity and Recreational Use 0 – 20 years The existing defences will remain in place with no active intervention preventing isolated flooding of agricultural land. Present defences will remain in place reducing the risk of flooding to properties and land. There will be limited impact in this epoch as the existing defence line will continue to protect the area from flood and erosion risk. Limited erosion and flood risk will not impact on existing landscape and visual amenity. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The established defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets. 20 – 50 years The current defences are expected to come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch, a no active intervention policy should continue. Actions may be needed to limit fluvial flooding (CFMP policy) Following failure of the defences flooding to agricultural land can be expected. No impact to national and internationally designated nature conservation sites. Failed defences and more frequent flooding will alter the existing landscape characteristics through the possible abandonment of present agricultural practices within the floodplain. Failure of the defences will increase flood risk to the historic environment. Following failure of the defences flooding to amenity and recreational assets may be increased. 50 – 100 years A Realigned defence line should be established and maintained throughout the epoch to prevent an increased flood risk. Further flood risk to residential properties and other assets is prevented by realignment of the defences. Managed realignment could offer opportunities to enhance designated sites and biodiversity. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. The area to the front of the new defence line will be subject to more frequent flooding, resulting in abandonment of present agricultural practices within the floodplain; landscape type will begin to change to intertidal. Realigned defences will protect historic environment behind new defences. Historic assets in front of realigned defences will be at risk from inundation. Impacts on historic environment and mitigation actions will need to be considered in determining realignment of defences. Further flood risk to amenity and recreational assets will be prevented by realignment of the defences.
  • 12. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 12 Policy Unit: NEW 4 - River Usk (east bank) at M4 crossing to Spytty Pill (north of A48 crossing)
  • 13. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 13 Preferred Policies to Implement the Plan: Epoch Preferred Policy Comments 0 to 20 years (2025) HTL The short term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. The existing defences will come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch. HTL recommends that defences are replaced. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. The position and height of new defences should be considered in more detail by the SEFRMS. The SEFRMS will consider combined risks from the sea (SMP2 policy) and the river (CFMP policy - take actions to reduce flood risk – see Section 3.4 SMP2-CFMP interactions). HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding to residential, commercial and industrial assets in this and linked Policy Units (NEW5, CALD 1). HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 20 to 50 years (2055) HTL The medium term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Reconstructed defences should be maintained. Actions should not impact on CFMP policy - take actions to reduce flood risk – see Section 3.4 SMP2- CFMP interactions). HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding residential, commercial and industrial assets in this and linked Policy Units (NEW5, CALD 1). HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 50 to 100 years (2105) HTL The long term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Reconstructed defences should be maintained. Actions should not impact on CFMP policy - take actions to reduce flood risk – see Section 3.4 SMP2- CFMP interactions). HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding residential, commercial and industrial assets in this and linked Policy Units (NEW5, CALD 1). HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. Economics Policy Unit Existing SMP1 Policy Time Period (epoch) SMP2 Assessment 0- 20 20- 50 50- 100 Preferred Plan Present Value Damages Preferred Plan Present Value Defence Costs NEW 4 HTL HTL HTL HTL £1,135m (NEW4-5, CALD1 total) £37m (NEW4-5, CALD1 total) The preferred policy is economically viable for the linked Policy Units of NEW 4, NEW 5, and CALD 1. The costs and damages of the preferred policy in the table above relate to actions taken in all linked policy units.
  • 14. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 14 Predicted Implication of the Preferred Plan for the NEW 4 Policy Unit Time Period Management Activities Property, Land Use and Human Health Nature Conservation – including Earth Heritage, Geology and Biodiversity Landscape Character and Visual Amenity Historic Environment Amenity and Recreational Use 0 – 20 years The existing defences are expected to come to the end of their serviceable life and will need to be replaced in this epoch. Following replacement a monitoring and maintenance programme should be established. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to existing properties and land use of this and adjacent units will be protected from increased risk of flooding and erosion. No detrimental impact from existing condition of national and internationally designated nature conservation sites. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Defences are likely to come to the end of their serviceable life and require reconstruction in this epoch. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets. 20 – 50 years The monitoring and maintenance programme should continue. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to existing properties and land use of this and adjacent units will be protected from increased risk of flooding and erosion. No detrimental impact from existing condition of national and internationally designated nature conservation sites. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets. 50 – 100 years The monitoring and maintenance programme should continue. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to existing properties and land use of this and adjacent units will be protected from increased risk of flooding and erosion. No detrimental impact from existing condition of national and internationally designated nature conservation sites. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets.
  • 15. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 15 Policy Unit: NEW 5 - River Usk (East bank) at Spytty Pill (North of A48 crossing) to Uskmouth Power Station point
  • 16. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 16 Preferred Policies to Implement the Plan: Epoch Preferred Policy Comments 0 to 20 years (2025) HTL The short term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. The existing defences will come to the end of their serviceable life in this epoch. HTL recommends that defences are replaced. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. The position, size and materials of new defences should be considered in detail by the SEFRMS. The SEFRMS will consider combined risks from the sea (SMP2 policy) and the river (CFMP policy - take actions to reduce flood risk – see Section 3.4 SMP2-CFMP interactions). HTL will manage the risk of impacts from flooding residential, commercial and industrial assets in this and linked Policy Units (NEW4, CALD 1). HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 20 to 50 years (2055) HTL The medium term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Reconstructed defences should be maintained. Actions should not impact on CFMP policy (take actions to reduce flood risk - see Section 3.4). HTL will manage risk of impacts from flooding residential, commercial and industrial assets in this and linked Policy Units (NEW4, CALD 1). HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. 50 to 100 years (2105) HTL The long term policy for this unit is Hold The Line. Reconstructed defences should be maintained. Actions should not impact on CFMP policy (take actions to reduce flood risk - see Section 3.4). HTL will manage risk of impacts from flooding residential, commercial and industrial assets in this and linked Policy Units (NEW4, CALD 1). HTL does not guarantee funding to build or maintain current or future defences or to counter sea level rise. Economics Policy Unit Existing SMP1 Policy Time Period (epoch) SMP2 Assessment 0- 20 20- 50 50- 100 Preferred Plan Present Value Damages Preferred Plan Present Value Defence Costs NEW 5 HTL HTL HTL HTL £1,135m (NEW4-5, CALD1 total) £37m (NEW4-5, CALD1 total) The preferred policy is economically viable for the linked Policy Units of NEW 4, NEW 5, and CALD 1. The costs and damages of the preferred policy in the table above relate to actions taken in all linked policy units.
  • 17. The above provides the local details in respect of the SMP-wide policy presented in the preceding sections of this Plan document. These details must be read in the context of the wider-scales issues and policy implications, as reported therein. Severn Estuary SMP2 Review – Final Report 17 Predicted Implication of the Preferred Plan for the NEW 5 Policy Unit Time Period Management Activities Property, Land Use and Human Health Nature Conservation – including Earth Heritage, Geology and Biodiversity Landscape Character and Visual Amenity Historic Environment Amenity and Recreational Use 0 – 20 years The existing defences are expected to come to the end of their serviceable life and will need to be replaced in this epoch. Following replacement a monitoring and maintenance programme should be established. Recently constructed defences are likely to require minimal maintenance. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to existing properties and land use of this and adjacent units will be protected from increased risk of flooding and erosion. A HTL policy will not impact the River Usk SAC/SSSI during this time period. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Defences are likely to come to the end of their serviceable life and require reconstruction in this epoch. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets. 20 – 50 years The monitoring and maintenance programme should continue. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to existing properties and land use of this and adjacent units will be protected from increased risk of flooding and erosion. River Usk SAC/SSSI will remain unaffected. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets. 50 – 100 years The monitoring and maintenance programme should continue. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to existing properties and land use of this and adjacent units will be protected from increased risk of flooding and erosion. River Usk SAC/SSSI will remain unaffected. Works should take account of possible environmental impacts and the need for an EIA. Increased height of defences or change in defence construction materials will affect local landscape - increasing presence in the landscape and disrupting views. Defences will manage the risk of flooding to historic environment assets. The defences will prevent increase in present flood risk to amenity and recreational assets.