SlideShare a Scribd company logo
ACCEI Institute &
ACCE (I) Bangalore Center
Sustainable Engineering Series (SES)
Talk 5
2
This presentation contains general and
academic data compiled from several
sources including internet media, scholarly
articles from research field and reference
books from reputed authors. Presenter
profoundly acknowledges their contribution
and assures that this presentation is meant
only for knowledge distribution and not for
any commercial gain.
Acknowledgement
FoM values are graphically
represented to determine the
sustainability quadrant and
sustainability ranges within
which materials fall by plotting
FoM against other critical
material parameters.
Figure of Merit (FoM)
ZC = E / ρ x Cm x 1 / Ca
Finding Material Suitability using Figure of Merit (FoM)
Where:
E = Modulus of Elasticity in GPa
ρ = Density of material in Kg / m3
Cm = Cost of material per m3
Ca = Cost of construction per m2
Figure of
Merit
(FoM)
4
Built
Environment
Interactions
Construction
Materials
Embodied
Energy
Greenhouse
Gasses
I1
I2I3
I
I = I1 + I2 + I3
Synergy Effect
Sustainability Interaction Model
EE
GHGs
Material
SDI
I1= √ (ZC x EEC x TEC)
I2= √ (ZC x ECC x TEC x µ)
I3= √ (ZC x EEC x ECC x TEC)
SDI = I = I1 + I2 + I3
I1= Interaction between EE - Materials
I2= Interaction between Materials-GHG
I3= Interaction between GHG - EE
Interaction Equations
I3
I2
I1
I
Computation using
Sustainability Development Index (SDI)
 It is seen (from the previous session) that higher SDI % in case of
an individual parameter represents higher interaction value and
hence lower sustainability. SDI Methodology provide us clarity on:
 Performance of individual Sub-systems
 Overall impact of a WBS during Pre-construction
 Information in respect of selection of suitable alternative
materials from recyclability, embodied energy or embodied
carbon perspective.
 Selection of materials using the concept of Figure of Merit
 Ranking a building in terms of sustainability assessment
beyond criteria based evaluation. How do we
go about?
Establishing Baselines
 Benchmarking of buildings provide a set of measurable baseline
values that can be compared with real time performance values
of a building to be assessed for Sustainability.
 This comparison facilitates optimizing the overall performance
of a building under assessment.
 Real time performance values, as compared to baseline values,
provide an indication of sustainability level of a building in
relative terms and expresses in %.
 Buildings for Benchmarking
purpose may change from
time to time due to
improved methodologies
and technologies and
materials.
 Benchmark building
selected for comparison
should be validated or
compared with the
available data / research
Benchmark Building and the Building to be assessed
for Sustainability should belong to same typology.
Energy Performance Benchmarking Process
Input-output Metrics to Be Clearly
Defined For Comparison
As per :
ISO 21931-1; 2010;
Baseline Values to
be used while
assessing
sustainability levels
in buildings.
SUB-SYSTEMS
EE
MJ/SQM
Concrete Works 1727.97
Steel works 708.26
Block masonry 445.52
Plastering
and Mortar 17.84
Doors Wooden 60.80
Windowds Wood 98.41
Flooring 183.97
Painting 8.05
Formwork 257.45
Water Proofing 14.35
3522.62
Benchmark Building
Embodied Energy
Computation
E S TA B L I S H E D B A S E L I N E VA L U E
3522.62 MJ / m2
Benchmark Building
Embodied Carbon Computation
Sub-Systems KgCO2 / Kg
Concrete Works 180.73
Steel works 60.99
Block masonry 22.77
Plastering and Mortar 3.2
Doors Wooden 5.09
Windowds Wood 8.23
Flooring 12.25
Painting 0.74
Formwork (Conve.) 20.72
Water Proofing 1.31
316.03
E S TA B L I S H E D B A S E L I N E V A L U E
316.03 KgCO2 / m2
SDI%
Concrete Works 8.25
Steel works 44.60
Block masonry 0.83
Plastering 0.06
Doors 1.53
Windowds 2.44
Flooring 8.95
Painting 0.06
Formwork 33.18
Water Proofing 0.1
100
Benchmark Building
Interaction Value Computation
MEAN SDI of (I1+I2+I3) =
(9705.9+17122.21)/2= 13414
(from the Tabulation)
Established Baseline Values
and Validation
Embodied Energy: 3522.62 MJ / m2
Embodied Carbon: 316.03 kgCO2 / m2
Mean Interaction : 13414 / m2
LEED Certification Credits
IGBC Green Homes Certification
SDI Percentage : 100 %
14
2001: Energy Conservation Act ( ECA) 2001
2001: Establishment of IGBC with CII
2002: Formation of BEE under ECA 2001.
2006: Integrated Energy Policy Draft
2006: Ministry of Environment and Forests makes Environment
Assessment mandatory for buildings with area > 20,000 sqm.
2007: Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC)
2007: Green Rating for Integrated Habitat Assessment (GRIHA) was
adopted as the national rating system for green buildings in
India.
2008: National Action Plan on Climate Change launched; Integrated
Energy Policy 2008 approved.
2014: Announcement of Smart Cities programme
2015: Paris Agreement signed by India under UN.
2016: Announcement of First 20 Smart Cities
2016: NBC 2016 included ‘Approach to Sustainability Chapter
Bhutan, the only
Carbon Negative
Country in the World.
Antarctica is losing 150
Billion Tons of ice
every year.
A scenario and CO2
concentration maintained at
450 ppm – Blue Scenario
One matured tree will
absorb 1 ton of CO2 in its
life time of about 40 years
Burning carbon rich
coal of 1 ton, emits 3.7
tons of CO2.
1 kWh (1 Unit) is
responsible for 0.94 kg
of CO2 emission.
A scenario and CO2
concentration maintained at
450 ppm – Blue Scenario
A grown up tree gives
about 120 kg of O2 and
absorbs 25 kg of CO2 per
year
Man needs 550
liters (0.54 m3)
of O2 per day
or
0.84 kg / day
Man needs 8
matured trees to
survive for one
year.
 Residential : 17 Floors: RCC Frame
 Total Area: 25076 m2
 Envelope : SCB + Tile Cladding
 Internal Walls: SCBs
 Flooring : Vitrified + Wood+ Granite +
Natural Stone + Ceramic
 Joinery : Wood / UPVC / Ply
 Formwork : Conventional
 Water Proofing : Membrane Type
 Climatic Region: Warm + Humid
 Seismic Zone : II
 Green Rating : YES
 No alternative energy source
 RMC – M20 to M40
Salient Features:
?
SDI Analysis
Based on Real-time Data
17
Computation of EE / m2 (Tot. Area=25076 sqm)
Total
Qty
EE Total EE
Kgs MJ / kg MJ
Reinforced Concrete Cum 10800.00 0.43 1033.66 1.96 2025.97
Plain Concrete Cum 1215.00 0.05 116.29 1.96 227.92
VDF Concrete 100 mm th Cum 2510.00 0.10 240.23 1.96 470.85
Reinforcement (Fe 500) MT 986.00 0.04 39.32 21.60 849.32
Concrete Block Masonry Cum 4276.00 0.17 306.94 0.59 181.09
Plaster(CM 1:6) Cum 1179.00 0.05 82.75 1.80 148.95
Wooden Doors Cum 103.00 0.00 3.49 10.40 36.31
UPVC Windows / Doors Sqm 2810.00 0.11 1600.00 179.29
Ceramic tiling Cum 118.00 0.00 9.41 10.00 94.11
Granite Tiling Cum 22.00 0.00 2.53 11.00 27.79
Natural Slate stone Cum 178.00 0.01 17.75 2.00 35.49
Steel Works MT 210.00 0.01 10 27.10 271.00
Painting works(3 coats) Sqm 68710.00 2.74 14.32 39.24
Formwork Conventional Sqm 65198.00 2.60 229.00 595.40
Membrane Water proofing Sqm 5219.00 0.21 14.32 2.98
5185.73
PRIMARY PARAMETERS
For following items EE is in MJ / m2
Unit Qty
Qty
Per m2
Total EE = 5185.73 MJ / m 2 = 5.2 GJ / m 2
Sub-Systems
MJ /
Sqm
Concrete Works 2724.74
Steel works 1120.33
Block masonry 181.09
Plastering 148.95
Doors 36.31
UPVC
Windowds/Doors 179.29
Flooring 157.40
Painting 39.24
Formwork
Conventional 595.40
Water Proofing 2.98
5185.73
Embodied Energy Distribution
What Does It Mean?
Total EE component = 25076 m2 x 5186 MJ / Sqm = 13 Cr. MJ ( R/O)
@ 1MJ = 0.28 kWh ; = 3.64 Cr. Units & @ Rs. 8 / unit = 29.12 cr.
This Building has EE component worth 29.12 cr.
Benchmark value : 3522.62 MJ/sqm. Approximate saving 9 cr.
19
Total
Qty
EC TOT ECe
kgs CO2e/ kg kg CO2e
Reinforced Concrete Cum 10800.00 0.43 1033.66 0.205 211.90
Plain Concrete Cum 1215.00 0.05 116.29 0.205 23.84
VDF Concrete 100 mm th Cum 2510.00 0.10 240.23 0.205 49.25
Reinforcement (Fe 500) MT 986.00 0.04 39.32 1.860 73.14
Concrete Block Masonry Cum 4276.00 0.17 306.94 0.063 19.34
Plaster(CM 1:6) Cum 1179.00 0.05 82.75 0.130 10.76
Wooden Doors Cum 103.00 0.00 3.49 0.870 3.04
UPVC Windows / Doors Sqm 2810.00 0.11 87.00 9.75
Ceramic tiling Cum 118.00 0.00 9.41 0.700 6.59
Granite Tiling Cum 22.00 0.00 2.53 0.700 1.77
Natural Slate stone Cum 178.00 0.01 17.75 0.13 2.31
Steel Works MT 210.00 0.01 10 2.030 20.30
Painting works(3 coats) Sqm 68710.00 2.74 1.31 3.59
Formwork Conventional Sqm 65198.00 2.60 18.43 47.92
Membrane Water proofing Sqm 5219.00 0.21 1.31 0.27
483.75
PRIMARYPARAMETERS Unit Qty Qty / m2
For following items EC is in kgCO2e / m2
Computation of EC / m2 (Tot. Area = 25076 sqm)
Total EC = 483.75 kgCO2 / m 2
KgCO2 /
m2
Concrete Works 284.99
Steel works 93.44
Block masonry 19.34
Plastering 10.76
Doors 3.04
UPVC Windows 9.75
Flooring 10.65
Painting 3.59
Formwork 47.92
Water Proofing 0.27
483.75
Concrete Works
59%
Steel works
19%
Block masonry
4%
Plastering
2%
Doors
1%
UPVC Joinery
2% Flooring
2%
Painting
1%
Formwork
10% Water Proofing
0%
EC Distribution
What Does It Mean?
Embodied Carbon Distribution
Total EC component = 25076 m2 x 483.75 KgCO2 / Sqm = 12212012 kgCO2e
@ 1 kgCO2e = 0.94 kWh ; = 11479291.28 kWh & @ Rs. 8/ unit rate = 9.20 cr.
This Building has EC component worth 9.20 cr.
Benchmark value : 316 KgCO2 /sqm. Approximate saving 3.5 cr.
SDI%
Concrete Works 7.4
Steel works 41.5
Block masonry 0.5
Plastering 0.4
Doors 0.5
UPVC Windowds+Doors 1.3
Flooring 5.1
Painting 0.2
Formwork 43.2
Waterproofing 0.04
100.0
7%
1%
1%
1%
5%
0%
Formwork
43.2 %
Steel work
42%
SDI Distribution %
Mean Interaction Value = I = (L:16978 + H:30292) / 2 = 23635 as
compared to Benchmark value is 13414. It means that there is a
potential to reduce the impact by almost 50%.
Note: Mean Interaction Values of each subsystem are compared with
that of the whole system and SDI is expressed in %
SDI
Cluster Projects
Sustainability Classification in Buildings
Non
Sustainable
Highly
Sustainable
Moderately
Sustainable
Least
Sustainable
STANDARD
MEASURES
EE
(GJ/m2
)
EC
(kgCO2e/m2
)
SDI %
MeanValue 5.19 474.30 53.8
Standard Deviation(SD) 0.40 31.00 12.52
Variance % 7.70 6.50 23.30
Baseline Values 3.52 316.00 100.00
Range Values 4.79-5.59 443.3-505.3 41.3-66.3
Sustainability Classification of Buildings is
taken as + / - 15% with respect to Baseline
Values and Variance lines. Upper limit is
based on international computations based
on climatic regions.
EE - SUSTAINABILITY RANGE
CLUSTER OF PROJECTS URBAN SCENARIO
25
EC - SUSTAINABILITY RANGE
CLUSTER OF PROJECTS URBAN SCENARIO
26
SDI - SUSTAINABILITY RANGE
CLUSTER OF PROJECTS URBAN SCENARIO
NON
SUSTAINABLE
SUSTAINABLE
 Embedded Energies (EE + EC)
 Material Suitability
 Material Classification
 Building Classification
 Building Clusters Classification
 Larger Community / Society
Sustainability Computation of Buildings using Real Time Data: Pre-Construction Phase

More Related Content

PDF
Embedded Energies, SDIs and Sustainability Quantification
PDF
Elements of Sustainable Construction and Design Parameters
PDF
Vidyavardhaka college mysore pdf ss
PDF
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITH CONCRETE
PDF
Role of Alternative Materials in Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Buildings
PDF
Optimizing and Saving WATER in achieving Green Construction
PPTX
Concrete Industry Sustainable Construction Strategy
PDF
A comparative study on sustainable building construction with conventional re...
Embedded Energies, SDIs and Sustainability Quantification
Elements of Sustainable Construction and Design Parameters
Vidyavardhaka college mysore pdf ss
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITH CONCRETE
Role of Alternative Materials in Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Buildings
Optimizing and Saving WATER in achieving Green Construction
Concrete Industry Sustainable Construction Strategy
A comparative study on sustainable building construction with conventional re...

What's hot (20)

PPT
Introduction and sustainable development in concrete technology
PDF
An Evaluative Study on Energy Efficient Building Materials
PPTX
ROR BREEAM Refurbishment Domestic Buildings Presentation 17.05.2013
PDF
Review on Green Building Concepts & Techniques
PPTX
Denia Kolokotsa: The cool and reflective materials' contribution to nzeb. Tec...
PDF
Green Building And Low Carbon Building in Malaysia
PDF
Nordan Double Glazing WLC Study
PDF
Properties of fal g masonry blocks
PDF
Proposal to BSEEP to adopt GreenPASS Operation (CIS 20 - CIDB) as Energy Effi...
PPT
Designing Sustainable Structures
PPTX
Control CO2 emission from residential building
PDF
C25_juliananakao5 TM101206 granskat
PDF
IRJET- Compaction Characteristics of Pond Ash on Clayey Soil
PPT
Sustainability In Steel Construction
PPT
GREEN BUILDING
PDF
Green concrete for sustainable construction
PPTX
Green Building Index
PDF
Concrete waste as building material
PPTX
BEB801 - Oral Presentation
Introduction and sustainable development in concrete technology
An Evaluative Study on Energy Efficient Building Materials
ROR BREEAM Refurbishment Domestic Buildings Presentation 17.05.2013
Review on Green Building Concepts & Techniques
Denia Kolokotsa: The cool and reflective materials' contribution to nzeb. Tec...
Green Building And Low Carbon Building in Malaysia
Nordan Double Glazing WLC Study
Properties of fal g masonry blocks
Proposal to BSEEP to adopt GreenPASS Operation (CIS 20 - CIDB) as Energy Effi...
Designing Sustainable Structures
Control CO2 emission from residential building
C25_juliananakao5 TM101206 granskat
IRJET- Compaction Characteristics of Pond Ash on Clayey Soil
Sustainability In Steel Construction
GREEN BUILDING
Green concrete for sustainable construction
Green Building Index
Concrete waste as building material
BEB801 - Oral Presentation
Ad

Similar to Sustainability Computation of Buildings using Real Time Data: Pre-Construction Phase (20)

PPTX
Sustainability Assessment in Buildings-A new tool
PDF
OPTIMUM DOSAGE OF GGBFS, BROKEN CERAMIC TILES AND COPPER SLAG IN THE PRODUCTI...
PDF
IRJET- Strength and Cost Comparision of Bagasse Concrete with the Applicat...
PDF
Fib prague 2011_paper
PDF
Making Sustainability Affordable with Digital Twins
DOCX
Timber framed house life cycle investigation
PDF
Benchmark cCstomer Day 22nd September 2010 - Building Regs Presentation
PPT
Chapter 3-1 Sustainable material, concrete.ppt
PDF
Day 1 session 1: Energy Efficiency in the EU.. What's Next?
PDF
Advance Net Zero Carbon (18 Aug 2021).pdf
PDF
Methodology to estimate energy savings in buildings within ETSAP-TIAM
PDF
IRJET- CharactCharacteristic Study on Behaviour of Integral Crystalline Water...
PPTX
Energy analysis using computer aided design
PPTX
PDF
COST EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE
PDF
Guideline for Calculating CO2 Emission from Ready Mixed Concrete Production a...
PDF
Experimental Investigation on Concrete with Replacement of Coarse Aggregate b...
PPTX
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION TO REDUCE HEAT INFILTRATION THROUGH ROOF STRUCTURE
PDF
BCI Equinox 2022 - CLB Kien Truc Xanh - Ms PhanThuHang - EN
PDF
3. roland streng
Sustainability Assessment in Buildings-A new tool
OPTIMUM DOSAGE OF GGBFS, BROKEN CERAMIC TILES AND COPPER SLAG IN THE PRODUCTI...
IRJET- Strength and Cost Comparision of Bagasse Concrete with the Applicat...
Fib prague 2011_paper
Making Sustainability Affordable with Digital Twins
Timber framed house life cycle investigation
Benchmark cCstomer Day 22nd September 2010 - Building Regs Presentation
Chapter 3-1 Sustainable material, concrete.ppt
Day 1 session 1: Energy Efficiency in the EU.. What's Next?
Advance Net Zero Carbon (18 Aug 2021).pdf
Methodology to estimate energy savings in buildings within ETSAP-TIAM
IRJET- CharactCharacteristic Study on Behaviour of Integral Crystalline Water...
Energy analysis using computer aided design
COST EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE
Guideline for Calculating CO2 Emission from Ready Mixed Concrete Production a...
Experimental Investigation on Concrete with Replacement of Coarse Aggregate b...
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION TO REDUCE HEAT INFILTRATION THROUGH ROOF STRUCTURE
BCI Equinox 2022 - CLB Kien Truc Xanh - Ms PhanThuHang - EN
3. roland streng
Ad

More from Ajit Sabnis (17)

PDF
Session 11- Comparative study of design software tools acce(i) ses session 11...
PPTX
Alternative Structural System - Session 10
PDF
PLANNING AND DESIGNING OF PRECAST STRUCTURES
PDF
Composite construction by Er. SURESH RAO
PPTX
Session 5 design of rcc structural elements PROF YADUNANDAN
PPTX
DESIGNING STEEL STRUCTURES AND PEBs
PDF
Software Application for Analysis Design-Drawing with Case Studies- vadalkar
PPTX
DESIGN OF RCC ELEMENTS SESSION 5 PROF. YADUNANDAN
PPTX
Foundation Types
PPTX
How to begin and complete a good structural design of a Project
PPTX
Computation of Loads on Buildings of Different Typologies
PPTX
How to begin and complete a good structural design of a Project
PDF
Structural engineering a responsible career 27.02.2021
PPTX
Green Approach to meet energy demands of Smart Cities
PDF
ROLE OF ACADEMIA IN ACHIEVING THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS f
PDF
Approach to Sustainability: NBC 2016 Provisions
PDF
Intro to sustainable engg part 1
Session 11- Comparative study of design software tools acce(i) ses session 11...
Alternative Structural System - Session 10
PLANNING AND DESIGNING OF PRECAST STRUCTURES
Composite construction by Er. SURESH RAO
Session 5 design of rcc structural elements PROF YADUNANDAN
DESIGNING STEEL STRUCTURES AND PEBs
Software Application for Analysis Design-Drawing with Case Studies- vadalkar
DESIGN OF RCC ELEMENTS SESSION 5 PROF. YADUNANDAN
Foundation Types
How to begin and complete a good structural design of a Project
Computation of Loads on Buildings of Different Typologies
How to begin and complete a good structural design of a Project
Structural engineering a responsible career 27.02.2021
Green Approach to meet energy demands of Smart Cities
ROLE OF ACADEMIA IN ACHIEVING THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS f
Approach to Sustainability: NBC 2016 Provisions
Intro to sustainable engg part 1

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
sustainable-development in tech-ppt[1].pptx
PPTX
Concept of Safe and Wholesome Water.pptx
PPTX
ser tico.pptxXYDTRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRY
PPTX
structure and components of Environment.pptx
DOCX
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Anaerobic Digestion (AD) Plants Core Comp...
PPTX
Environmental Ethics: issues and possible solutions
DOCX
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Dairy Farm Water Ensures Clean Water for ...
PDF
Cave Diggers Simplified cave survey methods and mapping
PPTX
Importance of good air quality and different pollutants.
PPTX
Delivery census may 2025.pptxMNNN HJTDV U
PPT
PPTPresentation3 jhsvdasvdjhavsdhsvjcksjbc.jasb..ppt
DOCX
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Leachate Storage Securely Contain Landfil...
DOCX
D-360 ESG Series: Sustainable Hospitality Strategies for a Greener Future
PDF
The Role of Non-Legal Advocates in Fighting Social Injustice.pdf
PPTX
Conformity-and-Deviance module 7 ucsp grade 12
PDF
Insitu conservation seminar , national park ,enthobotanical significance
PPTX
Arugula. Crop used for medical plant in kurdistant
PDF
Bai bao Minh chứng sk2-DBTrong-003757.pdf
PPTX
Office Hours on Drivers of Tree Cover Loss
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Biogas Tanks Securely store produced biogas.docx
sustainable-development in tech-ppt[1].pptx
Concept of Safe and Wholesome Water.pptx
ser tico.pptxXYDTRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRY
structure and components of Environment.pptx
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Anaerobic Digestion (AD) Plants Core Comp...
Environmental Ethics: issues and possible solutions
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Dairy Farm Water Ensures Clean Water for ...
Cave Diggers Simplified cave survey methods and mapping
Importance of good air quality and different pollutants.
Delivery census may 2025.pptxMNNN HJTDV U
PPTPresentation3 jhsvdasvdjhavsdhsvjcksjbc.jasb..ppt
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Leachate Storage Securely Contain Landfil...
D-360 ESG Series: Sustainable Hospitality Strategies for a Greener Future
The Role of Non-Legal Advocates in Fighting Social Injustice.pdf
Conformity-and-Deviance module 7 ucsp grade 12
Insitu conservation seminar , national park ,enthobotanical significance
Arugula. Crop used for medical plant in kurdistant
Bai bao Minh chứng sk2-DBTrong-003757.pdf
Office Hours on Drivers of Tree Cover Loss
Double Membrane Roofs for Biogas Tanks Securely store produced biogas.docx

Sustainability Computation of Buildings using Real Time Data: Pre-Construction Phase

  • 1. ACCEI Institute & ACCE (I) Bangalore Center Sustainable Engineering Series (SES) Talk 5
  • 2. 2 This presentation contains general and academic data compiled from several sources including internet media, scholarly articles from research field and reference books from reputed authors. Presenter profoundly acknowledges their contribution and assures that this presentation is meant only for knowledge distribution and not for any commercial gain. Acknowledgement
  • 3. FoM values are graphically represented to determine the sustainability quadrant and sustainability ranges within which materials fall by plotting FoM against other critical material parameters. Figure of Merit (FoM) ZC = E / ρ x Cm x 1 / Ca Finding Material Suitability using Figure of Merit (FoM) Where: E = Modulus of Elasticity in GPa ρ = Density of material in Kg / m3 Cm = Cost of material per m3 Ca = Cost of construction per m2 Figure of Merit (FoM)
  • 5. Sustainability Interaction Model EE GHGs Material SDI I1= √ (ZC x EEC x TEC) I2= √ (ZC x ECC x TEC x µ) I3= √ (ZC x EEC x ECC x TEC) SDI = I = I1 + I2 + I3 I1= Interaction between EE - Materials I2= Interaction between Materials-GHG I3= Interaction between GHG - EE Interaction Equations I3 I2 I1 I
  • 6. Computation using Sustainability Development Index (SDI)  It is seen (from the previous session) that higher SDI % in case of an individual parameter represents higher interaction value and hence lower sustainability. SDI Methodology provide us clarity on:  Performance of individual Sub-systems  Overall impact of a WBS during Pre-construction  Information in respect of selection of suitable alternative materials from recyclability, embodied energy or embodied carbon perspective.  Selection of materials using the concept of Figure of Merit  Ranking a building in terms of sustainability assessment beyond criteria based evaluation. How do we go about?
  • 7. Establishing Baselines  Benchmarking of buildings provide a set of measurable baseline values that can be compared with real time performance values of a building to be assessed for Sustainability.  This comparison facilitates optimizing the overall performance of a building under assessment.  Real time performance values, as compared to baseline values, provide an indication of sustainability level of a building in relative terms and expresses in %.
  • 8.  Buildings for Benchmarking purpose may change from time to time due to improved methodologies and technologies and materials.  Benchmark building selected for comparison should be validated or compared with the available data / research Benchmark Building and the Building to be assessed for Sustainability should belong to same typology. Energy Performance Benchmarking Process
  • 9. Input-output Metrics to Be Clearly Defined For Comparison As per : ISO 21931-1; 2010; Baseline Values to be used while assessing sustainability levels in buildings.
  • 10. SUB-SYSTEMS EE MJ/SQM Concrete Works 1727.97 Steel works 708.26 Block masonry 445.52 Plastering and Mortar 17.84 Doors Wooden 60.80 Windowds Wood 98.41 Flooring 183.97 Painting 8.05 Formwork 257.45 Water Proofing 14.35 3522.62 Benchmark Building Embodied Energy Computation E S TA B L I S H E D B A S E L I N E VA L U E 3522.62 MJ / m2
  • 11. Benchmark Building Embodied Carbon Computation Sub-Systems KgCO2 / Kg Concrete Works 180.73 Steel works 60.99 Block masonry 22.77 Plastering and Mortar 3.2 Doors Wooden 5.09 Windowds Wood 8.23 Flooring 12.25 Painting 0.74 Formwork (Conve.) 20.72 Water Proofing 1.31 316.03 E S TA B L I S H E D B A S E L I N E V A L U E 316.03 KgCO2 / m2
  • 12. SDI% Concrete Works 8.25 Steel works 44.60 Block masonry 0.83 Plastering 0.06 Doors 1.53 Windowds 2.44 Flooring 8.95 Painting 0.06 Formwork 33.18 Water Proofing 0.1 100 Benchmark Building Interaction Value Computation MEAN SDI of (I1+I2+I3) = (9705.9+17122.21)/2= 13414 (from the Tabulation)
  • 13. Established Baseline Values and Validation Embodied Energy: 3522.62 MJ / m2 Embodied Carbon: 316.03 kgCO2 / m2 Mean Interaction : 13414 / m2 LEED Certification Credits IGBC Green Homes Certification SDI Percentage : 100 %
  • 14. 14 2001: Energy Conservation Act ( ECA) 2001 2001: Establishment of IGBC with CII 2002: Formation of BEE under ECA 2001. 2006: Integrated Energy Policy Draft 2006: Ministry of Environment and Forests makes Environment Assessment mandatory for buildings with area > 20,000 sqm. 2007: Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC) 2007: Green Rating for Integrated Habitat Assessment (GRIHA) was adopted as the national rating system for green buildings in India. 2008: National Action Plan on Climate Change launched; Integrated Energy Policy 2008 approved. 2014: Announcement of Smart Cities programme 2015: Paris Agreement signed by India under UN. 2016: Announcement of First 20 Smart Cities 2016: NBC 2016 included ‘Approach to Sustainability Chapter
  • 15. Bhutan, the only Carbon Negative Country in the World. Antarctica is losing 150 Billion Tons of ice every year. A scenario and CO2 concentration maintained at 450 ppm – Blue Scenario One matured tree will absorb 1 ton of CO2 in its life time of about 40 years Burning carbon rich coal of 1 ton, emits 3.7 tons of CO2. 1 kWh (1 Unit) is responsible for 0.94 kg of CO2 emission. A scenario and CO2 concentration maintained at 450 ppm – Blue Scenario A grown up tree gives about 120 kg of O2 and absorbs 25 kg of CO2 per year Man needs 550 liters (0.54 m3) of O2 per day or 0.84 kg / day Man needs 8 matured trees to survive for one year.
  • 16.  Residential : 17 Floors: RCC Frame  Total Area: 25076 m2  Envelope : SCB + Tile Cladding  Internal Walls: SCBs  Flooring : Vitrified + Wood+ Granite + Natural Stone + Ceramic  Joinery : Wood / UPVC / Ply  Formwork : Conventional  Water Proofing : Membrane Type  Climatic Region: Warm + Humid  Seismic Zone : II  Green Rating : YES  No alternative energy source  RMC – M20 to M40 Salient Features: ? SDI Analysis Based on Real-time Data
  • 17. 17 Computation of EE / m2 (Tot. Area=25076 sqm) Total Qty EE Total EE Kgs MJ / kg MJ Reinforced Concrete Cum 10800.00 0.43 1033.66 1.96 2025.97 Plain Concrete Cum 1215.00 0.05 116.29 1.96 227.92 VDF Concrete 100 mm th Cum 2510.00 0.10 240.23 1.96 470.85 Reinforcement (Fe 500) MT 986.00 0.04 39.32 21.60 849.32 Concrete Block Masonry Cum 4276.00 0.17 306.94 0.59 181.09 Plaster(CM 1:6) Cum 1179.00 0.05 82.75 1.80 148.95 Wooden Doors Cum 103.00 0.00 3.49 10.40 36.31 UPVC Windows / Doors Sqm 2810.00 0.11 1600.00 179.29 Ceramic tiling Cum 118.00 0.00 9.41 10.00 94.11 Granite Tiling Cum 22.00 0.00 2.53 11.00 27.79 Natural Slate stone Cum 178.00 0.01 17.75 2.00 35.49 Steel Works MT 210.00 0.01 10 27.10 271.00 Painting works(3 coats) Sqm 68710.00 2.74 14.32 39.24 Formwork Conventional Sqm 65198.00 2.60 229.00 595.40 Membrane Water proofing Sqm 5219.00 0.21 14.32 2.98 5185.73 PRIMARY PARAMETERS For following items EE is in MJ / m2 Unit Qty Qty Per m2 Total EE = 5185.73 MJ / m 2 = 5.2 GJ / m 2
  • 18. Sub-Systems MJ / Sqm Concrete Works 2724.74 Steel works 1120.33 Block masonry 181.09 Plastering 148.95 Doors 36.31 UPVC Windowds/Doors 179.29 Flooring 157.40 Painting 39.24 Formwork Conventional 595.40 Water Proofing 2.98 5185.73 Embodied Energy Distribution What Does It Mean? Total EE component = 25076 m2 x 5186 MJ / Sqm = 13 Cr. MJ ( R/O) @ 1MJ = 0.28 kWh ; = 3.64 Cr. Units & @ Rs. 8 / unit = 29.12 cr. This Building has EE component worth 29.12 cr. Benchmark value : 3522.62 MJ/sqm. Approximate saving 9 cr.
  • 19. 19 Total Qty EC TOT ECe kgs CO2e/ kg kg CO2e Reinforced Concrete Cum 10800.00 0.43 1033.66 0.205 211.90 Plain Concrete Cum 1215.00 0.05 116.29 0.205 23.84 VDF Concrete 100 mm th Cum 2510.00 0.10 240.23 0.205 49.25 Reinforcement (Fe 500) MT 986.00 0.04 39.32 1.860 73.14 Concrete Block Masonry Cum 4276.00 0.17 306.94 0.063 19.34 Plaster(CM 1:6) Cum 1179.00 0.05 82.75 0.130 10.76 Wooden Doors Cum 103.00 0.00 3.49 0.870 3.04 UPVC Windows / Doors Sqm 2810.00 0.11 87.00 9.75 Ceramic tiling Cum 118.00 0.00 9.41 0.700 6.59 Granite Tiling Cum 22.00 0.00 2.53 0.700 1.77 Natural Slate stone Cum 178.00 0.01 17.75 0.13 2.31 Steel Works MT 210.00 0.01 10 2.030 20.30 Painting works(3 coats) Sqm 68710.00 2.74 1.31 3.59 Formwork Conventional Sqm 65198.00 2.60 18.43 47.92 Membrane Water proofing Sqm 5219.00 0.21 1.31 0.27 483.75 PRIMARYPARAMETERS Unit Qty Qty / m2 For following items EC is in kgCO2e / m2 Computation of EC / m2 (Tot. Area = 25076 sqm) Total EC = 483.75 kgCO2 / m 2
  • 20. KgCO2 / m2 Concrete Works 284.99 Steel works 93.44 Block masonry 19.34 Plastering 10.76 Doors 3.04 UPVC Windows 9.75 Flooring 10.65 Painting 3.59 Formwork 47.92 Water Proofing 0.27 483.75 Concrete Works 59% Steel works 19% Block masonry 4% Plastering 2% Doors 1% UPVC Joinery 2% Flooring 2% Painting 1% Formwork 10% Water Proofing 0% EC Distribution What Does It Mean? Embodied Carbon Distribution Total EC component = 25076 m2 x 483.75 KgCO2 / Sqm = 12212012 kgCO2e @ 1 kgCO2e = 0.94 kWh ; = 11479291.28 kWh & @ Rs. 8/ unit rate = 9.20 cr. This Building has EC component worth 9.20 cr. Benchmark value : 316 KgCO2 /sqm. Approximate saving 3.5 cr.
  • 21. SDI% Concrete Works 7.4 Steel works 41.5 Block masonry 0.5 Plastering 0.4 Doors 0.5 UPVC Windowds+Doors 1.3 Flooring 5.1 Painting 0.2 Formwork 43.2 Waterproofing 0.04 100.0 7% 1% 1% 1% 5% 0% Formwork 43.2 % Steel work 42% SDI Distribution % Mean Interaction Value = I = (L:16978 + H:30292) / 2 = 23635 as compared to Benchmark value is 13414. It means that there is a potential to reduce the impact by almost 50%. Note: Mean Interaction Values of each subsystem are compared with that of the whole system and SDI is expressed in %
  • 23. Sustainability Classification in Buildings Non Sustainable Highly Sustainable Moderately Sustainable Least Sustainable STANDARD MEASURES EE (GJ/m2 ) EC (kgCO2e/m2 ) SDI % MeanValue 5.19 474.30 53.8 Standard Deviation(SD) 0.40 31.00 12.52 Variance % 7.70 6.50 23.30 Baseline Values 3.52 316.00 100.00 Range Values 4.79-5.59 443.3-505.3 41.3-66.3 Sustainability Classification of Buildings is taken as + / - 15% with respect to Baseline Values and Variance lines. Upper limit is based on international computations based on climatic regions.
  • 24. EE - SUSTAINABILITY RANGE CLUSTER OF PROJECTS URBAN SCENARIO
  • 25. 25 EC - SUSTAINABILITY RANGE CLUSTER OF PROJECTS URBAN SCENARIO
  • 26. 26 SDI - SUSTAINABILITY RANGE CLUSTER OF PROJECTS URBAN SCENARIO
  • 27. NON SUSTAINABLE SUSTAINABLE  Embedded Energies (EE + EC)  Material Suitability  Material Classification  Building Classification  Building Clusters Classification  Larger Community / Society