Tools and Techniques for Quality Management

Chapter 8
Tools and Techniques for Quality
Management
By
Prof. Nazrul Islam, PhD
Canadian University of Bangladesh

After working through this Block, you
should be able to:
1. Describe three categories of tools and techniques for QM
2. Define and interpret tools used in data collection and analysis
3. Define and interpret tools used in planning.
4. Define and interpret tools used in continuous improvement
activities.
5. Describe the Deming P-D-C-A cycle and apply it to QM
situations.
6. Recount the Six Sigma approach and the DMAIC and DMADV
approaches.

Three Categories Of Tools And
Techniques For QM
1. Tools used in data collection and analysis
2. Tools used in planning.
3. Tools used in continuous improvement
activities.

Tools for Data Collection and
Interpretation
Any systematic attempt to manage quality, be it in a manufacturing or a
service activity, must rely upon data collection and interpretation to
measure progress, to guide decisions, and to enable deep understanding of
customer needs. Businesses regularly collect market and customer data
using many tools and from many sources, and it is important to evaluate
the relative quality and reliability of each data source, as it contributes data
(or information, which is sometimes described as data which have been
analyzed and interpreted) that is useful to the decision-makers in the
organization. Under the rubric of Voice of the Customer (VOC), Jeff Israel1,
the founding Principal of Satisfaction Strategies, a consulting firm
specializing in satisfaction measurement and customer-focused change,
describes the data inputs in five useful categories: customer records;
complaints; surveys; benchmarking; and transaction data. We discuss each
of these briefly.

Interpretation
1. Customer Records
Customer records of purchase history, warranty claims,
and credit information are a valuable source of
intelligence. It is important that the organization has
systems in place to collect information relating to quality
(of product or service), and to ensure that it reaches
decision makers. It is not adequate to have questions on
warranty cards, but to fail to collate the responses and
to ensure that they the reach design and marketing
groups.

Interpretation
2. Data on Complaints
Complaints are often a rich source of ideas for
continuous improvements in products or services. Some
organizations have found very innovative ways to
capture complaints from customers while they are fresh
and current. For example, British Airways has installed
video kiosks in several airports, to receive and record
customer comments. Customers with complaints are
encouraged to record them, with the assurance that
they will be reviewed by management of the company.

Interpretation
2. Data on Complaints, Contd.,
This approach has the benefit of capturing the urgency and emotion
attached to complaints, something which is difficult to capture on
surveys or customer response cards filled in later. Once again, the
best companies have systems in place to collect and analyze
complaint data, and to ensure that it is shared with decision
makers. It is, of course, important that staff working at complaint
desks (whether face-to-face, on the telephone, or online) be well
trained in responding proactively to complaints, but it is equally
important that they see it as their role to be part of the continuous
improvement system. This part of their job requires that they are
trained in data collection and summarization, so complaint data are
captured in useable forms for decision makers.

Interpretation
Some companies go out of their way to solicit complaints from
customers. For example, one of the authors recently had some
repair work done on the heating system in his home. A few
days after the service call, he received a telephone call from the
customer service department of the company enquiring into his
satisfaction with the service call. ‘Was the service technician
courteous?’ ‘Was the cost of the parts and labour reasonable?’ ‘Was
the response time acceptable?’

Interpretation
These were some of the questions asked, in a clear attempt to see
if there was any cause for complaint in the service provision. Similar
types of data collection take place through customer response cards
in hotels, restaurants, etc. All of these are attempts to collect data
to be used in continuous improvement efforts in progressive
organizations. Something as simple as the question posed by the
hotel desk clerk during checkout: ‘Was everything suitable during
your stay?’ can be an effective data collection approach – so long
as it is systematic, the data are collected and summarized, and
provided to decision makers.

Interpretation
3. Survey Data
Surveys are used by many companies, especially when exploring
new products and services, or new features for existing products
and services. Quality improvement is a key aspect of any survey
system, and questions about the quality of products and services
should be part of any survey of customers or potential customers.
Especially important is the collection of data on the relationship
between quality and price in the opinion of customers. Regular
surveys of customers are a useful tool to assist in early spotting of
trends in the marketplace, and in the perceptions of customers with
respect to the company’s standing in the marketplace.

Interpretation
3. Survey Data, Contd.,
Various types of surveys are commonly used: mail surveys;
telephone surveys; interviews; and focus groups. Each type has its
advantages and disadvantages with respect to reliability and validity
of data, with respect to cost, and with respect to the kinds of
opinions and attitudes which can be probed. Detailed discussion of
the methodology most appropriate in a given situation is beyond
the scope of this course. As a manager, you are advised to consult
with experts in survey methodologies, if you wish to gather survey
data. You could also apply the techniques and tools discussed in
your statistics course.

Interpretation
4. Benchmarking
According to Xerox, the company that pioneered the concept
of photocopying in North America, benchmarking is the
continuous process of comparing products, services, and
practices against the best in that particular activity.
Benchmarking is the process of continuously searching for
new ideas and innovations in methods, practices, procedures,
and implementing them to achieve improvement. It is not the
examination of an entire process at the same time. It is a
process of examining very narrow activities and determining
how other organizations, both within the industry and outside
of it, are performing the task.

Interpretation
4. Benchmarking, Contd.,
Benchmarking can be accomplished by looking for companies that
may be carrying out a function extremely well, no matter what their
size. This may mean examining:
(1) internal operations,
(2) competitors' procedures,
(3) methods used by other companies that are carrying out the
same function in different industries.
For example, Boeing Aircraft Company benchmarked
manufacturers of everything from computers to ships when
they were exploring ways to reduce the manufacturing cycle
time for 747 and 767 aircraft.

Interpretation
4. Benchmarking, Contd.,
Another good source for companies against which to benchmark would be
Baldrige Award winners, who have similar characteristics. Benchmarking
usually involves:
1. Identifying the portion of the process that is to be examined (what to
benchmark).
2. Determining how the process is measured, and what difficulties are
being experienced.
3. Planning the benchmarking project and receiving the resources required
to complete it.
4. Finding organizations that do that function extremely well, i.e., defining
benchmarking partners.
5. Collecting data from benchmarking partners.
6. Comparing one’s own procedures with those whose data has been
collected.
7. Making recommendations and implementing the ideas.

Interpretation
5. Transaction Data
Organizations have much data regarding transactions with their
customers, and they need to be conscious of the improvement
opportunities presented by these data. Information about
frequency and volumes of purchases by a customer over time will
possibly signal changes in that customer’s satisfaction with
products. Such patterns must be tracked and monitored, with
intervention taken when signals present themselves. A customer
who has ordered 1000 units each month for the past six months
and who now orders only 500 units must be examined carefully.
The best companies institute automatic tracking systems to alert
them to changes in customer purchase or return patterns.

Tools for Planning
The collection of customer data is, of course, only the first step in
QM. Once data are collected, they must be translated into action, if
they are to have an impact on quality. This section describes a
number of tools used in quality planning: Quality Function
Deployment (QFD); Simultaneous Engineering; and a set of Seven
Management Tools commonly grouped together.
1. Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
Quality Function Deployment (QFD), also known as The House
of Quality, is one of the best devices created to tie product and
service design decisions directly to customer wants and needs.
It has led to a host of successful breakthrough products. QFD is
designed to deploy customer input throughout the design,
production, marketing, and delivery facets of a given product or
service.

Tools for Planning
1. Quality Function Deployment, Contd.,
In a typical QFD application, a cross-functional team creates and
analyzes a matrix linking customer wants and needs to a set of
product and service design metrics that the company can then
measure and control. This matrix is sometimes called the House of
Quality, leading to the close identification of the two similarly
named tools.
Dr. John Hauser, Professor of Marketing at the MIT Sloan School of
Management, coauthored the first widely-read English paper about
this breakthrough product development technique: The House of
Quality .

Tools for Planning
Since 1966, Quality Function Deployment (QFD) has been used
worldwide in every industry and sector to:
1. Priorities spoken and unspoken customer wows, wants, and
needs;
2. Translate these needs into technical characteristics and
specifications; and
3. Build and deliver a quality product or service by focusing
everybody toward customer satisfaction.
QFD helps organizations seek out both spoken and unspoken needs,
translate these into actions and designs, and focus various business
functions toward achieving a common goal. QFD enables
organizations to exceed normal expectations and provide a level of
unanticipated excitement that generates ‘Wow!’ responses.

Tools for Planning
Professors Shigeru Mizuno and Yoji Akao developed QFD in Japan in
the late 1960s. At the time, statistical quality control, which was
introduced after World War II, had taken roots in the Japanese
manufacturing industry, and the quality activities were being
integrated with the teachings of such notable scholars as Dr. Juran,
Dr. Kaoru Ishikawa, and Dr. Feigenbaum that emphasized the
importance of making quality control a part of business
management (which eventually became known as TQC and TQM).
The purpose of Professors Mizuno and Akao was to develop a
quality assurance method that would design customer satisfaction
into a product before it was manufactured. Prior to that time,
quality control methods were primarily aimed at fixing a problem
during or after manufacturing.

Tools for Planning
The first large scale application was presented in 1966 by Kiyotaka
Oshiumi of Bridgestone Tire in Japan, which used a process
assurance items ‘fishbone’ diagram to identify each customer
requirement (effect), and to identify the design substitute quality
characteristics and process factors (causes) needed to control and
measure each of them.
In 1972, with the application of QFD to the design of an oil tanker
at the Kobe Shipyards of Mitsubishi Heavy Industry, the fishbone
diagrams grew unwieldy. Since the effects shared multiple causes,
the fishbones (Note: see Section 4 of this Block for more
information on the fishbone diagram) could be refashioned into a
spreadsheet or matrix format with the rows being desired effects of
customer satisfaction and the columns being the controlling and
measurable causes.

Tools for Planning
At the same time, Katsuyoshi Ishihara introduced the Value
Engineering principles used to describe how a product and its
components work. He expanded this to describe business
functions necessary to assure quality of the design process itself.
Merged with these new ideas, QFD eventually became the
comprehensive quality design system for both product and business
process.
The introduction of QFD to America and Europe began in 1983
when the American Society for Quality Control published Akao's
work in their journal Quality Progress, and Cambridge Research
(today Kaizen Institute) invited Akao to give a QFD seminar in
Chicago.

Tools for Planning
Together with the English publication of QFD: The Customer-Driven
Approach to Quality Planning and Deployment4 and QUALITY
FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT: Integrating Customer Requirements into
Product Design5, QFD became popular across a wide variety of
industries in the U.S. and Western Europe. In the U.S., in particular,
because of its flexibility and comprehensiveness, the methodology
was eagerly embraced by the businesses that were facing the
Japanese competition. There, new and innovative applications of
QFD were experimented by industries and businesses that were not
reached before. A survey in the mid-1990s of 400 major U.S.
companies found that almost two thirds (2/3) of them were using
QFD in some parts of the production planning process.

Tools for Planning
Japan has continued to push the envelope of QFD applications
through an on-going QFD Research Sub-Committee at the Union of
Japanese Scientists and Engineers (JUSE) as well as their annual
QFD Symposium established in 1993. They hosted the first
International Symposium on QFD and are a charter member of the
International Council for QFD.
Today, QFD continues to inspire strong interest around the world,
generating ever newer applications, practitioners and researchers
each year. Countries that have held national and international QFD
Symposium to this day include the U.S., Japan, Sweden, Germany,
Australia, Brazil, and Turkey.

Tools for Planning
QFD is quite different from other quality initiatives in that it seeks
out both ‘spoken’ and ‘unspoken’ customer requirements and
maximizes ‘positive’ quality (such as ease of use, fun, luxury) and
this is what makes the information valuable. Traditional quality
systems aim at minimizing negative quality (such as defects, poor
service). With those systems in place, the best you can get is zero
defects - which we see is not enough to strive for, especially when
products still fail to sell despite being defect-free.

Tools for Planning
What are the characteristics of QFD as a quality system?
1. QFD is a quality system that implements elements of Systems
Thinking (viewing the development process as a system) and Psychology
(understanding customer needs, what 'value' is, and how customers or end
users become interested, choose, and are satisfied, etc.).
2. QFD is a quality method of good Knowledge or Epistemology (how
do we know the needs of the customer? how do we decide what features
to include? and to what level of performance?)
3. QFD is a quality system for strategic competitiveness; it
maximizes positive quality that adds value; it seeks out spoken and
unspoken customer requirements, translates them into technical
requirements, prioritizes them and directs us to optimize those features
that will bring the greatest competitive advantage.
4. Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is the only comprehensive
quality system aimed specifically at satisfying the customer throughout
the development and business process - end to end.

Tools for Planning
2. Simultaneous (Concurrent) Engineering
Concurrent Engineering (CE) is the systematic approach to the
integrated, concurrent design of products and related processes,
including manufacturing and support. This approach is intended to
cause the developers to consider all elements of the product life
cycle, from conception through to disposal, including quality, cost,
schedule, and user requirements.
The basic tenet of CE is the integration of methodologies,
processes, human beings, tools, and methods to support product
development. CE is multi-disciplinary in that it includes aspects from
object-oriented programming, constraint programming, visual
programming, knowledge-based systems, hypermedia, database
management systems, and CAD/CAM.

Tools for Planning
2. Simultaneous (Concurrent) Engineering, Contd.,
Concurrent engineering involves the interaction of a diverse group
of individuals who may be scattered over a wide geographic range.
To enable effective and complete communication among them,
there are certain technological concepts that must also become
organized into concurrent layers. Distributed information sharing
and collaborative/cooperative work are important techniques to
maintain or exceed the current level of product development
productivity. Concurrent engineering takes advantage of shared
information and allows simultaneous focus on different phases of
the product or service development life cycle. Many existing World
Wide Web (WWW) capabilities could support a wide area CE
environment. For a CE approach to be effective, however, a strong
level of communication between the developers and end-users must
exist.

Tools for Planning
In the context of CE, a customer is both internal and external to the
development process. Each member of the CE staff is an internal
customer for intermediate products during development. CE
advocates an integrated, parallel approach to design. By paying
attention to all aspects of the design at each phase, errors are
detected prior to being implemented in the product. The integrated
design process must include a strong information sharing system,
an iterative process of redesigns and modifications, trade-off
analysis for design optimization, and documentation of all parts of
the design.

Tools for Planning
In a typical project, the role of CE is to integrate the interests of
diverse people: the designer, whose goal is to create a product or
service which meets customer needs; the production people, whose
goal is to manufacture (or implement) the product efficiently; the
marketing people, whose goal is to sell and deliver the product or
service; and the finance people, whose goal is to make a profit on
the product. All these functions (and several others) have an
interest in the product and must work together. The objective of CE
is to ensure that they do! An early example of the CE approach was
the development of the Taurus line of automobiles by Ford in the
1980s. Representatives from all the interested functions worked
closely together on Project Taurus teams, communicating regularly
and solving problems much before they could affect the results. For
example, manufacturing was able to suggest minor design changes
that would have important productivity and quality impacts.

Tools for Planning
3. Seven ‘New’ Management Tools
A set of seven management and planning tools has come to be
used widely in the improvement of quality planning efforts. The set
traces its roots to operations research in the U.S. in the post-World
War II era, but the tools have been combined and popularized as a
set by the Japanese since the mid-1980s. The tools are especially
useful in assisting managers to bring order and structure to
unstructured problems, to plan strategically, and to manage large,
complex projects. We provide here only a brief description of these
tools. For much more detail, you can refer to the many books on
the subject, listed in the References section.

Tools for Planning
3. Seven ‘New’ Management Tools, Contd.,
i. Affinity diagram: The affinity diagram is used to generate
ideas, and then organize these ideas in a logical manner. This is a
modification of traditional brainstorming methods. The first step in
developing an affinity diagram is to post the problem (or issue)
where everyone can see it. Next, team members write their ideas
for solving the problem on cards and post them below the problem.
Seeing the ideas of other members of the team helps everyone
generate new ideas. As the idea generation phase slows, the team
sorts the ideas into groups, based on patterns or common themes.
Finally, descriptive title cards are created to describe each group of
ideas.

Tools for Planning
i. Affinity diagram, Contd.,

Tools for Planning
ii. Interrelationship digraph: The interrelationship digraph
allows teams to look for cause and effect relationships between
pairs of elements. The team starts with ideas that seem to be
related (often generated from affinity diagrams) and determines if
one causes the other. If idea 1 causes idea 5, then an arrow is
drawn from 1 to 5. If idea 5 causes idea 1, then the arrow is drawn
from 5 to 1. If no cause is ascertained, no arrow is drawn. When
the exercise is finished, it is obvious that ideas with many outgoing
arrows cause things to happen, while ideas with many incoming
arrows result from other things. The items with mostly arrows going
in are long range targets and the items that have mostly arrows
going out are initial action items.

Tools for Planning
ii. Interrelationship digraph, Contd.,

Tools for Planning
iii. Tree diagram: A tree diagram assists teams in
exploring all the options available to solve a problem, or
accomplish a task. The tree diagram actually resembles
a tree when complete. The trunk of the tree is the
problem or task. Branches are major options for solving
the problem, or completing the task. Twigs are elements
of the options. Leaves are the means of accomplishing
the options.

Tools for Planning
iii. Tree diagram:

Tools for Planning
iv. Prioritization matrix: The prioritization matrix helps teams
select from a series of options based on weighted criteria. It can be
used after options have been generated, such as in a tree diagram
exercise.
A prioritization matrix is helpful in selecting which option to pursue.
The prioritization matrix adds weights (values) to each of the
selection criteria to be used in deciding between options. For
example, if you need to install a new software system to better
track quality data, your selection criteria could be as follows: cost,
lead-time, reliability, and upgrades. A simple scale, say 1 through 5,
could be used to prioritize the selection criteria being used.
Next, you would rate the software options for each of these
selection criteria and multiply that rating by the criteria weighting.

Tools for Planning
iv. Prioritization matrix, Contd.,

Tools for Planning
v. matrix diagram: The matrix diagram allows teams to describe
relationships between lists of items. It is the most widely used of the
planning tools and helps managers to address two questions: ‘Are these
data related?’ and ‘How strong is the relationship?’ It can be very useful in
facilitating an analysis of the relationship of each item in one set to all
items in the other set. This often triggers some thinking that would not
have happened if this organized approach were not used. It is also helpful
to see patterns of relationships – which items don't relate to anything and
which ones are heavy hitters?
A matrix diagram can be used to compare the results of implementing a
new manufacturing process to the needs of a customer. For example, if the
customer's main needs are low cost products, short lead times, and
products that are durable, and a change in the manufacturing process can
provide faster output, larger quantities, and more part options; then the
only real positive relationship is the shorter lead time to the faster output.
The other process outcomes – larger quantities and more options – are of
little value to the customer. This matrix diagram, relating customer needs to
changes in the manufacturing process, would be helpful in deciding which
manufacturing process to implement.

Tools for Planning
vi. Process decision program chart: The process decision program
chart is a contingency planning tool that can help a team to identify things
that could go wrong, so corrective action can be planned in advance. The
process decision program chart starts with the problem. Below this, major
issues related to the problem are listed. Below the issues, associated tasks
are listed. For each task, the team considers what could go wrong and
records these possibilities on the chart. Next, the team considers actions to
prevent things from going wrong. Finally, the team selects which preventive
actions to take from all the ones listed.

Tools for Planning
vii. Activity network diagram: The activity network diagram graphically
shows total completion time, the required sequence of events, tasks that
can be done simultaneously, and critical tasks that need monitoring. In this
respect, an activity network diagram is similar to the traditional PERT chart
used for activity measurement and planning. One of its benefits is that it
indicates which items can be done simultaneously. Another benefit is that it
makes it clear what set of activities will take the longest and where time
efficiencies can be achieved.

Tools for Continuous Improvement
We all know that quality is everyone's responsibility; however,
getting everyone to participate is difficult. People need tools to help
them identify quality problems and plan corrective action. Let's
review seven tools that are helpful in the quality management
process.
1. Check Sheet
The first and simplest tool is the check sheet. Use of check sheets
is often the first task taught to new work teams because they are
simple to use, and they encourage the use of data, rather than
impressions, in discussing processes.
A check sheet is an easy-to-understand form used to answer the
question, ‘How often are certain events happening?’ Check sheets
start the process of translating opinion into facts.

REASON WEEK 1 WEEK 2 WEEK 3 TOTAL
Illness /// // / 6
Vacation //// //// /// 11
Family Reasons / // // 5
TOTAL 8 8 6 22
A simple check sheet is shown below. It was used to record reasons
for absenteeism among employees in a work group over a period of
three weeks.
1. Check Sheet, Contd.,

1. Check Sheet, Contd.,

2. Histogram
The second tool is the histogram. It is a helpful to array data so that
patterns can be discerned visually. The histogram is a simple statistical
tool for this purpose. A histogram is a vertical bar chart
representing a tabulation of data arranged according to size.
This tabulation of data is commonly known as a frequency distribution.
The frequency distribution can take a number of shapes. A ‘normal’ or
bell-shaped curve indicates that most of the data collected are centered
on an average value. A skewed, or off-centre shape indicates that most
data are not centered around an average value, but toward either the
high or low limit of the range. Skewed data can result when a machined
diameter is running consistently toward the high end of the tolerance. A
normal distribution would result when most of the diameter readings are
near the centre of the tolerance. The wider the spread of the bar chart,
the more variability there is in the characteristic being measured. Wide
fluctuations can be indicators that a process is out of control and needs
intervention.

2. Histogram, Contd.,

3. Pareto chart
The third tool is the Pareto chart. A Pareto chart shows how frequently
various types of problems occur. The name of this tool comes from an
Italian economist, Vilfredo Pareto, who observed that 80% of the wealth
in Italy was held by 20% of the population. This Pareto Principle has
been found to apply to many physical situations, with most of the defects
being caused by a small number of factors. Identification of the 20% of
causes that relate to 80% of the defects allows managers to focus on the
important quality drivers. A Pareto chart lists the problems discovered
along the horizontal axis and the number of occurrences along the
vertical axis, with the most frequently-occurring problem listed first, and
so on. In a machining operation, a Pareto chart may indicate: Undersize
hole (two occurrences), sharp edge (two occurrences), and oversize
diameter (18 occurrences). If these are the only reasons for defective
parts, then 18/22 [2+2+18=22] = 81.8% of the defects are caused by
oversize diameters. In this case, the oversize diameter problem should
receive the highest priority.

3. Pareto chart, Contd.,

4. Cause and Effect Diagram
The fourth tool is the cause and effect diagram, or ‘fishbone’ or
‘Ishikawa’ diagram. The cause and effect diagram consists of a long
horizontal arrow with a description of the problem. Causes of the problem
are depicted as radial lines from this arrow. Causes for the ‘causes’ are then
depicted as horizontal lines from the radial lines. Additional ‘causes for the
causes’ are depicted as additional radial lines, and so forth. The completed
diagram looks like a skeleton and so is also referred to as a ‘fishbone
diagram’. A major use of the CE diagram is in brainstorming to attempt to
list all the possible causes related to a particular problem. A problem that
could benefit from a cause and effect diagram is a poorly machined finish.
Causes could be: 1) worn tool, 2) insufficient coolant, or 3) wrong cutting
feed.
Causes of the worn tool could be: a) no other tool available, b)
insufficient inspection of the part, or c) wrong tool for the application. It is
common to attempt to summarize the major causes under a small set of
categories, such as the 4 Ps in Quality Management: people; policies;
procedures; and plant.

4. Cause and Effect Diagram, Contd.,

5. Scatter Diagram
The fifth tool is the scatter diagram. A scatter diagram is another
graphic representation of the interrelation between variables, typically an
‘input’ variable and an ‘output’ variable. The horizontal axis contains
values of one variable (independent variable), while the vertical axis
shows values of the other variable (dependent variable). The relationship
between the two variables is indicated by the slope of the diagram, as
follows:
Positive correlation: as one value increases, so does the other.
Possible positive correlation: as one value increases, the other value
increases somewhat.
No correlation: the results are completely random.
Possible negative correlation: as one value increases, the other value
decreases somewhat.
Negative correlation: as one value increases, the other decreases.
Note: Correlation does not necessarily mean causality! The correlation
results could be caused by an outside factor.

5. Scatter Diagram, Contd.,

6. Control Chart
The sixth tool is the control chart. A control chart shows the variability
of a process by plotting sample measurements of a key characteristic of
the product (such as diameter of a shaft) over time. A control chart
includes a central line representing the average value, and lines
representing upper and lower control limits. There are two main types of
control charts:
X-Bar (x), showing averages of the measurements (centre of the
process); and R-Bar (r), showing ranges of the measurements in a
sample (variability about the centre of the process).
A manufacturing process is considered under control if recorded readings
are within the upper and lower control limits on the chart.

6. Control Chart, Contd.,

7. Flowchart
The seventh and last tool is the flowchart. A flowchart is a picture or
map of a process, showing the steps in sequence, for completion of an
operation. Drawing a flowchart is often a useful tool to assist team
members in understanding their role in the operation, and the
impact on others and on the operation, of their performance. Using well-
developed symbols and tools, a flowchart can depict key relationships,
decision points, resources and responsibilities of members, and can play
a powerful role in understanding, communication, and diagnosis of
problems.

7. Flowchart, Contd.,

The P-D-C/S-A Cycle
A fundamental element of Total Quality Management is continuous
improvement, particularly as applied to people, products, processes,
services and all related learning. A quality tool that embodies this
concept is the Shewhart Cycle Learning and Improvement, commonly
known as the P-D-S-A cycle. Walter Shewhart was a prominent
statistician who is considered by many as the ‘father’ of contemporary
quality control. The Bell Telephone Hawthorn Works employed Dr.
Shewhart during the 1920s. He is the founder of the SPC control chart
and the premise that harnessing and managing process variation will
result in favorable economic impact for the customer and for the
producer of products and services.
Walter Shewhart was a teacher and mentor of Dr. W. Edwards Deming.
According to Dr. Deming, Shewhart's second book, entitled Statistical
Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control9, introduced this renowned
quality tool.

The P-D-C/S-A Cycle
In the 1950's Deming proposed that business processes should be analyzed
and measured to identify sources of variations that cause products to deviate
from customer requirements. He recommended that business processes be
placed in a loop of continuous feedback so that
managers can identify and change the parts of the process that need
improvements. As a teacher, Deming popularized a version of Shewart’s
concept in a diagram to illustrate this continuous process, commonly known as
the P-D-C-A cycle for Plan, Do, Check, Act:
i. PLAN: Design or revise business process components to improve results
ii. DO: Implement the plan and measure its performance
iii. CHECK/STUDY: Assess the measurements and report the results to
decision makers
iv. ACT: Decide on changes needed to improve the process The original
Shewhart Cycle consists of a simple circle or wheel divided into four
quadrants; one for each of Plan, Do, Study (or Check), and Act. This is a way
to achieve the outcomes you desire through a heightened quality awareness.
The complete cycle can be used to determine the details of each quadrant. It
is a virtual never-ending process and is key to
achieving ‘transformation.’

The P-D-C/S-A Cycle, Contd.,
Use of the P-D-C/S-A cycle by quality practitioners
will stimulate learning and continuous improvement
of techniques, processes, services and systems.
The decisions and judgments we make must be
supported with facts that are in turn, supported by
statistical data (not opinions).

Six Sigma
Six Sigma refers to a measure of quality that strives for near
perfection. Based upon statistical concepts of variability in
product characteristics that are related to quality, and on
the quality control methodology, a six sigma standard will
tolerate no more than 3.4 defective items per one million
produced.
This number arises out of assumptions that the characteristic
being measured has a standard, normal probability
distribution, and ‘sigma’ refers to the measure of variability in
the characteristic. From the normal distribution,
approximately one item in three falls outside one standard
deviation (one sigma), and 3.4 items in one million
fall outside six standard deviations.

Six Sigma, Contd.,
Now, of course, the acceptability or not of a product is a
decision that is fundamentally made by the end-user, so the
approach is to make improvements in the process, reducing
variation, so that sigma becomes so small (and hence six
sigma becomes so small) that only a miniscule proportion of
products fall outside the six sigma limits.
The key here is continuous improvement through the use of
what has become called the Six Sigma DMAIC approach.
Six Sigma relies on tried-and-true methods that have been
around for decades.
In fact, Six Sigma discards a great deal of the complexity that
characterizes total quality management (TQM). By one
expert's count, there are more than 400 TQM tools and
techniques.

Six Sigma, Contd.,
Six Sigma takes a handful of these methods and
trains a small cadre of in-house technical leaders,
known as Six Sigma Black Belts, to a high level of
proficiency in the application of these techniques. To
be sure, some of the methods used by the Black
Belts, including up-to date computer technology, are
highly advanced. But the tools are applied within a
simple performance-improvement framework known
as DMAIC, or define-measure-analyze improve-
control, which is analogous to the Deming model
known as plan-do-study-act. The DMAIC framework
applies to existing processes that are falling below
specification.

Six Sigma, Contd.,
For the development of new products or processes at
Six Sigma levels, the accepted framework is DMADV,
or define-measure-analyze-design-verify.
General Electric, one of the pioneers of Six Sigma
(together with Motorola and Allied Signal) began
using the Six Sigma approach in 1995, and claimed
savings of $10 billion (U.S. dollars) in the first five
years.

Six Sigma, Contd.,
Five Stages of Six Sigma

Six Sigma, Contd.,
Five Stages of Six Sigma, Contd.,
1. Define the problem. Craft a problem statement, goal
statement, project charter, customer requirement, and
process map.
2. Measure the current process. Collect data on current
performance and issues.
3. Analyze the cause of issues.
4. Improve the process.
5. Control.

Six Sigma, Contd.,
DMAIC Process

Six Sigma, Contd.,
DMADV Roadmap

Six Sigma, Contd.,
The Differences between DMAIC and DMADV
DMAIC and DMADV sound very similar, don't they? The
acronyms even share the first three letters. But that's about
where the similarities stop.
MAIC Define
Measure
Analyze
Improve
Control
Define the project goals and customer (internal and
external) deliverables
Measure the process to determine current
performance
Analyze and determine the root cause(s) of the
defects
Improve the process by eliminating defects
Control future process performance

Six Sigma, Contd.,
The Differences between DMAIC and DMADV, Contd.,
When to use DMAIC?
The DMAIC methodology, instead of the DMADV methodology,
should be used when a product or process is in existence at your
company but is not meeting customer specification or is not
performing adequately.
MAIC Define
Measure
Analyze
Improve
Control
Define the project goals and customer (internal and
external) deliverables
Measure and determine customer needs and
specifications
Analyze the process options to meet the customer
needs
Design (detailed) the process to meet the customer
needs
Verify the design performance and ability to meet
customer needs

Six Sigma, Contd.,
The Differences between DMAIC and DMADV, Contd.,
When to use DMADV?
The DMADV methodology, instead of the DMAIC methodology,
should be used when:
A product or process is not in existence at your company and
one needs to be developed.
The existing product or process exists and has been optimized
(using either DMAIC or not) and still doesn't meet the level of
customer specification or Six Sigma level.

Tools and Techniques for Quality Management

Difference Between Lean and Six Sigma

Six Sigma, Contd.,
Summary
This Block has explored a wide range of tools commonly used in
quality management in manufacturing and in service
organizations. The focus has been placed on ensuring that you,
as general managers, rather than as specialists in QM,
understand the characteristics of tools and their application. Of
course, in any actual situation, you will want to call upon
technical specialists (statisticians, operations researchers, Six
Sigma Black Belts, *** etc.) to implement procedures and
processes for continuous improvement in quality. Your role as a
manager is to understand the language of quality management,
to know about the types of tools available, and to know when to
call for a technical expert! Once you have called for technical
expertise, your role and responsibility is to oversee the activities
of the experts, so as to ensure that they work towards the
achievement of organizational objectives.

Self-test
1. Explain the three categories of tools and
techniques for quality management. What tools
could be used for planning, data collection and
analysis, and for continuous improvement?
2. Why would an organization use simultaneous
engineering?
3. Describe the P-D-C-A cycle.

Tools and Techniques for Quality Management

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Tools and Techniques for Quality Management (20)

More from Nazrul Islam (13)

Recently uploaded (20)

Tools and Techniques for Quality Management