Transient overvoltages and currents: detection and measurement

APPLICATION NOTE
TRANSIENTS & OVERVOLTAGES: DETECTION AND
MEASUREMENT
UIE
August 2015
ECI Publication No Cu0139
Available from www.leonardo-energy.org

Publication No Cu0139
Issue Date: August 2015
Page i
Document Issue Control Sheet
Document Title: AN – Transients and Overvoltages: Detection and Measurement
Publication No: Cu0139
Issue: 03
Release: August 2015
Author(s): UIE
Reviewer(s): Roman Targosz, Stefan Fassbinder
Document History
Issue Date Purpose
1 June 2007 Original publication
2 February
2012
Adaptation for adoption into the GPG
3 August
2015
Review
Disclaimer
While this publication has been prepared with care, European Copper Institute and other contributors provide
no warranty with regards to the content and shall not be liable for any direct, incidental or consequential
damages that may result from the use of the information or the data contained.
Copyright© European Copper Institute.
Reproduction is authorized providing the material is unabridged and the source is acknowledged.

Page ii
CONTENTS
Contents ......................................................................................................................................................... ii
Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ 1
Introduction: Power quality monitoring ......................................................................................................... 2
Proliferation of SPDs and Electronic devices................................................................................................... 3
Purposes of power quality monitoring............................................................................................................ 4
Contractual applications.........................................................................................................................................4
Troubleshooting .....................................................................................................................................................5
Statistical surveys ...................................................................................................................................................5
Frequency range of instrumentation .............................................................................................................. 6
Low-frequency domain transients..........................................................................................................................6
General.....................................................................................................................................................6
Installation Considerations.......................................................................................................................8
High-frequency domain transients.........................................................................................................................8
Field monitoring .......................................................................................................................................9
Laboratory tests and measurements .....................................................................................................10
Wide-band current transducers .............................................................................................................10
RMS voltage envelope assessment ............................................................................................................... 12
Background...........................................................................................................................................................12
Window width and sampling rate ........................................................................................................................12
Voltage envelope..................................................................................................................................................12

Page 1
SUMMARY
This is a fifth publication in a series of Application Notes on transient overvoltages and transient currents in AC
power systems and customer installations.
For a general introduction to the subject, first read Cu0134 – Transients and Overvoltages: Introduction.
This application note provides insight into the monitoring of transient phenomena. Such a monitoring can have
various purposes: verifying contractual commitments, troubleshooting, or statistical surveys. This application
note provides a brief discussion on the technical considerations involved in each of those three different types
of monitoring.
The following section describes the measurement of transients in more detail. The generic name transients
covers a wide range of frequency spectra. Each frequency spectrum corresponds to a different kind of origin of
the transients. It can be capacitor switching surges, fuse-operating surges, inductive switching surges, lightning
surges, electrical fast transients, or electrostatic discharge events. This paper includes a discussion of
monitoring transients in the low as well as in the high frequency domain.
The last section of this application note describes a technique for comparing the recorded transients with
voltage envelope specifications provided by equipment manufacturers.

Page 2
INTRODUCTION: POWER QUALITY MONITORING
Characterizing the surge environment has been a subject of research for the last forty years. For the most part
it has been driven by increasing concern for the vulnerability of new electronic appliances to transient
overvoltages. However, practically all the transient recording campaigns conducted by major organizations
(see Annotated Bibliography Section) have been limited to the measurement of transient voltages. As
described in these archival papers, detection and recording of transients in the 1960s and 1970s were
performed by a variety of commercial and custom-made systems. Then, in the mid-eighties, disturbance
monitors took a giant step forward with the development of on-board computers with the capability of
displaying graphical representations of the disturbance. In addition to equipment malfunction or damage
concerns, the ready availability of these graphics is likely to have played an important role in bringing much
attention to what became known as Power Quality.
In the case of transients as a part of power quality issues, a new situation evolved quite independently from
the proliferation of transient-recording power quality monitors. It concerned the proliferation of SPDs, PCs,
and other electronic equipment using a DC link in their mains-connected power supply.

Page 3
PROLIFERATION OF SPDS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES
A change has been proposed in the protocol for the monitoring surges within the overall monitoring of power
quality in AC power systems. This change has become necessary because end-user power systems are no
longer what they were at the time the early surveys of transient overvoltages were conducted. Varistor-based
surge-protective devices (SPDs) have become so ubiquitous in low-voltage AC power systems that few
locations can be found where there is not some form of transient voltage limitation in effect.
Any attempt here to characterize an environment so that appropriate SPDs could then be prescribed for
specific locations based on voltage measurements would be quite misleading. What such a measurement
would yield today is no longer the surge characteristics of the monitored system as it was at the time of the
early surveys, but rather the residual voltages of whatever SPDs are installed nearby.
This situation is further complicated by the proliferation of PCs and other electronic equipment using an
intermediate DC link for power conversion. In the industrial environment, the presence of high-power
equipment can make this situation even more apparent. These intermediate DC links are powered by a
rectifier-capacitor input. When many such links are present, they can readily absorb incoming surges (unless
associated with a series reactance, not an unusual situation in variable-frequency drives).
Instead, the surge environment should be characterized by its capability of delivering a surge current into the
equipment, in particular SPDs installed separately or incorporated in vendor's equipment. A monitor that
records only voltage would create the illusion that the installation is not experiencing significant surge activity,
while in fact substantial surge currents might be involved. These surge currents can cause interference in
control circuits by the coupling of the electromagnetic field they radiate, or impose excessive stress upon SPDs
that have been incorrectly sized based on the false impression of low surge activity.
In recent years, however, power quality problems have lead to a widespread use of electronic power factor
correction on the input side of many electronc devices. While the coupling between the smoothing capacitor
and the grid is hereby void, it is particularly this electronic circuitry at the input side that makes devices
sensitive to the very transients that are now no longer absorbed by the smoothing capacitance.
The significance of making the distinction between recording current surges versus recording voltage surges is
very important for equipment designers. A decision to provide only modest surge withstand capability for an
SPD incorporated at the power port of the equipment might be made because the contemporary surveys
reveal few and then only moderate (voltage) surges. When combined with the misconception that ‘the lower
the clamping voltage, the better’ [Martzloff & Leedy, 1989], the result can be disastrous.

Page 4
PURPOSES OF POWER QUALITY MONITORING
Power quality measurements are generally undertaken for one or more of three distinct purposes:
1. Contractual applications
2. Troubleshooting applications
3. Statistical surveys applications
The following paragraphs provide a brief discussion of the technical considerations involved in making such
measurements. Legal and financial considerations are beyond the scope of this Guide. The IEC 61000-4-30
provides more detailed recommendations and normative specifications on the performance of power quality
instruments and measurements. Moreover, the IEC 62305 series provides details on wave forms,
categorisation, origin, mitigation measures of transients and a guide to risk assessment of lightning protection.
CONTRACTUAL APPLICATIONS
Power quality measurements related to contractual agreements are conducted to compare actual conditions
against those agreed to in a contract between supplier and consumer. Prior to carrying out power quality
measurements to test compliance with contract terms, reference should be made to the following list of
considerations.
1. In order to ensure that the survey results are representative of normal system conditions, the survey
should discount data at times when the supply is subject to severe disturbance resulting from:
- Exceptional weather conditions
- Third-party interference
- Acts by public authorities
- Industrial action
- Force majeure
- Power shortages resulting from external events
2. The terms specified in the contract need to be both achievable by the supplier and acceptable to the
end user. The starting point for a power quality contract should be the power quality standard or
specification currently in place. The terms of this contract should dictate power quality parameters
against which measurements can be compared.
3. Prior to the measurement survey, both parties will agree upon the measurement location, i.e. the
point on the network where measurements are to be taken. The measurement location should take
account of the need to assess power quality at the interface between the two parties and any
trouble-shooting requirements at that point or beyond.
4. Duration of the measurement survey should be set by the contract terms, with consideration given to
Item 1 above.

Page 5
TROUBLESHOOTING
Power quality-related troubleshooting is generally performed in response to operational incidents in an
installation. Consequently, there is often some pressure on obtaining results as quickly as possible, rather than
produce data of an archival or legal value. Nevertheless, this need for fast diagnosis should not lead to
premature or unfounded conclusions, but rather an in-depth understanding of the situation and circuit
behaviour. To that end, recordings showing waveforms (signatures) are a powerful tool, notwithstanding the
fact that numerical results are difficult to describe in the same accurate terms used to assess power quality in
the context of contractual or statistical assessments.
The most common graphic representation is a time-domain plot of voltage and current. Other forms, such as
histogram displays of harmonics or falling-water charts, may also occasionally be used. Common time-scales
for signatures range from 100 microseconds to 30 days. Usually an instrument determines the best time-scale
for presenting a power quality event based on the characteristics and duration of the event.
Experts use power quality signatures for many different purposes:
- To identify the cause or source of a power quality event
- To locate the cause or source of a power quality event
- To select an appropriate solution to prevent a similar power quality event from re-occurring
- To verify that a power quality solution is working properly
- To identify the specific characteristics that might cause incompatibility with a specific load
- To predict future failure mechanisms and correct problems before they arise
Although many experts can identify common power quality events from their voltage signatures alone, having
current signatures as well greatly increases the range and precision of statements that can be made about a
power quality event.
STATISTICAL SURVEYS
Power-quality related statistical surveys are generally performed for one of several different purposes:
- Benchmarking the performance of a distribution system
- Assessing the environment in which specific equipment is about to be installed
- Other purposes
A power quality monitoring programme intended to produce an estimate of system-wide power quality must
be carefully designed. Statistical calculations based on the measurements assume a random selection of
monitoring points. However, this is not practical because it requires an unreasonably large sample size to
ensure that a wide range of relevant system characteristics are represented in the sample.
A much more efficient programme can be designed by placing some simple controls on a selection of
monitoring points. This technique involves defining a set of site descriptors that comprise the most important
power quality-determining characteristics. Site descriptors must be stratified; that is, possess a small set of
discrete values. The random selection process is then constrained such that at least one monitoring point is
selected for each strata. Details of such a survey design can be found in [Markel et al., 1993].

Page 6
FREQUENCY RANGE OF INSTRUMENTATION
Under the generic name of transients, the frequency spectrum of these transients covers a wide range. Figure
29 shows the spectrum of classical surge-test waveforms. Surveys conducted since the 1960s were performed
with a variety of instruments so that the results have to be interpreted with considerable caution [Martzloff &
Gruzs, 1988].
Figure 1
The IEC classification of the electromagnetic environment (IEC 61000-2-5) suggests a classification of transient
events in the millisecond, microsecond, and nanosecond range. These time domains correspond respectively
to capacitor-switching surges and fuse-operating surges, to inductive-switching and lightning surges, and to
electrical fast transients (EFT) and electrostatic discharge (ESD) events. This Guide is concerned with the first
two of these three frequency-domain ranges; each merits some details on the postulates and instrumentation
applied in measuring the transients. The EFT and ESD measurements are typically staged test procedures
conducted in the laboratory with pre-calibrated surge generators. The first two (millisecond and microsecond
range) are conducted in the field as monitoring projects, as well as in the laboratory for research into their
propagation, immunity, and mitigation.
LOW-FREQUENCY DOMAIN TRANSIENTS
GENERAL
Monitoring of transients on distribution systems requires the use of transducers to obtain acceptable voltage
and current signals. Voltage monitoring on secondary systems can usually be performed with direct
connections but even these locations require current transformers (CTs) for acquiring the current signal.
Most available monitoring instruments intended for general power quality monitoring are designed for input
voltages up to 600 V rms and current inputs up to 5 A peak. Voltage and current transducers must be selected
to provide these signal levels. There are two important concerns which must be addressed in selecting
transducers.

Page 7
1. Signal levels – Signal levels should use the full scale of the instrument without distorting or clipping
the desired signal
2. Frequency response – This characteristic is particularly important for transient and harmonic
distortion monitoring where high frequency signals are particularly important
These considerations as well as transducers installation considerations are discussed below.
Voltage transducers (VTs) – VTs should be sized to prevent measured disturbances from inducing saturation.
For low-frequency transients, this requires the knee point of the transducer saturation curve be at least 200%
of nominal system voltage.
The frequency response of a standard metering class VT depends on the type and burden. In general, the
burden should be a very high impedance. This is generally not a problem with most monitoring equipment
available today. Most monitoring instruments present a very high impedance to the transducer. With a high
impedance burden, the response is usually adequate to at least 5 kHz.
Some substations use capacitively-coupled voltage transformers (CCVTs) for voltage transducers. These should
not be used for general power quality monitoring since there is a low voltage transformer in parallel with the
lower capacitor in the capacitive divider. This configuration results in a circuit that is tuned to the power
frequency, and will not provide accurate representation of any higher frequency components.
Measuring very high frequency components in the voltage requires a capacitive divider or pure resistive
divider: Special purpose capacitor dividers can be obtained for measurements requiring accurate
characterization of transients up to at least 1 MHz.
Current transducers (CTs) – Selecting the proper transducer for currents is more difficult. The current in a
distribution feeder changes more often and with greater magnirude than the voltage.
The proper CT current rating and turns ratio depend on the measurement objective. If fault or inrush currents
are of concern, the CT (or the current clamps, respectively) must be sized in the range of 20 to 30 times normal
load current. The same applies to the connected measurement device. This however will result in low
resolution of the load currents and inability to accurately characterize load current harmonics.
Standard metering-class CTs are generally adequate for frequencies up to 2 kHz although phase error can start
to become significant before this limit. For higher frequencies, window type CTs with a high turns ratio
(doughnut, split core, bar type, and clamp-on) should be used.
Additional desirable attributes for CTs include:
1. Large turns ratio; e.g. 2,000:5, or greater.
2. Widow-type CTs; primary wound CTs (e.g. CTs in which system current flows through a winding) may
be used, provided that the number of turns is less than five.
3. Small remnant flux, e.g. 10%, of the core saturation value.
4. Large core area. The more steel that is used in the core, the better the frequency response of the CT
5. Secondary winding resistance and leakage impedance as small as possible. This allows more of the
output signal to flow into the burden, rather than the stray capacitance and core exciting impedance.

Page 8
INSTALLATION CONSIDERATIONS
Monitoring on the distribution primary requires both voltage and current transducers. Selection of the best
combination of these transducers depends on a number of factors, including:
- Monitoring location (substation, overhead,underground, et cetera)
- Space limitations
- Ability to interrupt circuit for transducer installation
- Need for current monitoring
Existing substation CTs and VTs (with the exception of CCVTs) can usually be used for power quality
monitoring. For monitoring on distribution primary circuits, it is desirable to use a transducer that can be
installed without taking the circuit out of service. Meanwhile, transducers for monitoring both voltage and
current have been developed that can be installed on a live line.
These devices incorporate a resistive divider type VT and a window type CT in a single unit. The resistive
divider is connected from phase to ground and the output is taken from the lower resistor. This device can be
installed on the cross-arm in place of the original insulator. Initial tests indicated adequate frequency response
for these transducers, assuming careful installation and no corrosion between contacts on the split core.
However, further field experience with these units has shown that the frequency response, even at the power
frequency, might be dependent upon current magnitude, temperature, and secondary cable length. This
makes this device very difficult to use and therefore of questionable reliability for accurate power quality
monitoring in the field.
In general, all primary sites should be monitored with metering-class VTs and CTs to obtain accurate results
over the required frequency spectrum. Installation will require a circuit outage but convenient designs can be
developed for pole-top installations.
Another option for monitoring primary sites involves monitoring at the secondary of an unloaded distribution
transformer. This will give accurate results up to at least 3 kHz. This option does not help with the current
transducers, but it is possible to get by without currents at some circuit locations (e.g. end of the feeder). This
option may be particularly attractive for underground circuits where the monitor can be installed on the
secondary of a pad-mounted transformer.
Transducer requirements are much simpler for monitoring at secondary sites. Direct connection for the
voltage is possible for 120/208 V rms systems. This permits full utilization of the frequency response of the
instrument.
Currents can be monitored with either metering CTs (at the service entrance, for example), or with clamp-on
CTs (at locations within the facility). Clamp-on CTs are available in a wide range of turn ratios. The frequency
range is usually stated by the manufacturer.
HIGH-FREQUENCY DOMAIN TRANSIENTS
The nature of high-frequency instrumentation makes it necessary to distinguish between field measurements
– typically monitoring power quality parameters or troubleshooting – and laboratory measurements for
research or post-mortem purposes. In the case of field measurements, unattended monitoring is performed
with sophisticated portable instruments that include on-board processing of the recorded data, sometimes
with capability of remote downloading. Such a procedure is in sharp contrast with staged tests, generally
associated with investigations into equipment failures.

Page 9
Staged tests can involve the deliberate switching of loads and switchgear operations – known sources of
power quality problems – to assess the response of a particular power system. Another approach to staged
field tests is the deliberate injection of surges into the power system. However the opportunities for such tests
are rare because system operators are reluctant to have their facility subjected to such stresses [Martzloff,
1990].
In the case of laboratory measurements, the typical approach is to generate a transient with a surge generator
and apply it to the equipment being investigated. However, a factor that differentiates surge testing (for
immunity assessment) from other laboratory procedures involving immunity to other power quality
disturbances is the fact that the ultimate stopping point of such a test is the failure of the equipment under
test, thus making replication difficult and/or expensive.
FIELD MONITORING
On the positive side, considerable progress has been made in the availability of monitoring instruments since
the early 1980s. Portable digital units are now capable of recording a vast amount of data for displaying on a
wide screen and for detailed analysis in the lab later.
An undesirable situation is the lack of consensus – and consequently in reporting results – on what the
parameters of the transient monitoring should be. There are generally good reasons for which the researchers
set the parameters of their monitoring instruments, but they are not necessarily standardized and often not
explicitly stated in the reports.
Therefore, end-users can be left with unresolved ambiguities on reported results. They should be quite explicit
in defining the parameters when sponsoring field monitoring or staged tests. Such parameters should include
the following concepts, as presented below in the form of questions to be answered before initiating a
monitoring project. The answers may well depend on the purposes of conducting the monitoring
measurements.
Voltage vs. current measurements? – As discussed earlier in this Application Note, the proliferation of SPDs
and electronic devices has completely changed the results that a transient voltage measurement can usefully
convey in the present power systems environment. Awareness of this issue is gaining strength, but has not yet
reached the point where the desirable shift from voltage to current measurements has occurred.
Transducer and instrument response? – The high level of sophistication in the measurement instruments has
sometimes resulted in oversimplification of some parameters and led to a lack of understanding of the limits of
the reported results. Careful examination, or even cross-examination, is in order for the implicit postulates of
an instrument and/or of the document reporting the monitoring results.
Thresholds? – Setting the threshold above which a disturbance will be recorded (and reported) is a decision
that can be made by deliberate choice, or sometimes by a default setting of a power quality monitor. There
are technical, practical, and even commercial considerations involved in establishing such a threshold. If the
setting is too low, the user may be drowning in a stream of data; if it is too high, only rare events will be
detected. In some of the published surveys, a rationale is presented for this threshold setting, such as selecting
a level slightly below the level at which the equipment of interest is known to experience problems. However,
this level is not always clearly stated. This can therefore become a misleading – even if inadvertent – oversight
when pie charts are prepared that are allegedly presenting a picture of the relative share of the various types
of disturbances lumped into a pool (or stream) of all events. By manipulating the respective thresholds of
detection of the various events – either deliberately (covertly) or by default – one of these events can be
stated unquestionably as the most frequent type of disturbance and leave it to the sponsor of the
measurement to decide how to fill the blanks.

Page 10
Dead time after recording? – Some transients can involve a series of bursts separated by a shorter time than
the recovery and rearming time of the instrument processing and recording the data. The instrument is thus
not ready to effectively record the next event. In the event of a crescendo in the burst, it is possible that only
the first portion – and not the worst – of a multiple-peak event will be recorded.
Conductor combinations? – Some of the early instruments had a limited number of channels – at the extreme
only one – and the reported results of monitoring were equally limited. A review of these surveys made in the
late eighties [Martzloff & Gruzs, 1988] and even more recent papers [Pfeiffer & Graf, 1992] revealed that to
some researchers, the insulation stress was the important factor, and thus the voltage measurements were
made between line and earth. To other researchers, however, the stress on power electronic components was
the prime factor and thus the measurements were made between line and neutral. Given the different
earthing practices in place around the world, these two measurements are not comparable. More recent
instruments offer multiple channels so that either by default or by choice, the surge voltages appearing
between different combinations of conductors can be monitored. Yet some summary reports may still leave
that detail unclear.
Filtering out power frequency voltage? – This is another detail that is sometimes left unspecified because
different researchers seem to have different points of view. Some instruments inherently filter out the
fundamental power-frequency voltage and report the deviation. Other instruments measure and report the
total (instantaneous) voltage. It may be argued that when recording surge voltages in the range of kilovolts,
the difference of including or not including the instantaneous value of the fundamental (maximum of 170 V for
120-V systems, or 350 V for 230-V systems) is not a significant difference. However, for moderate surge peaks,
it would be important. If the result of the measurement is used for predicting the behaviour of a nonlinear
SPD, it is the total that counts, and filtering out the fundamental would be misleading.
LABORATORY TESTS AND MEASUREMENTS
In contrast with unattended field monitoring of transients, laboratory measurements can be performed under
close scrutiny and tests schedules can be adjusted to best fit the observed results as the test programme
progresses. It is a mistake to schedule a rigid test schedule and execute it blindly. While it might appear self-
evident that a test programme is a living organism, experience shows that for surge testing in particular, some
protocols focused on a pass/fail criterion do not allow for adjusting the test schedule. The consequence is that
useful knowledge that might be gained by closely following the test results as they progress is lost in the
process.
Another pitfall in laboratory tests focused on pass/fail is the notion that all generic products – SPDs in
particular in the context of this Guide – should be treated as equals when assessing their performance. This
notion is sometimes described under the label of black box testing and is driven by a commendable wish to
treat all candidate products evenly and fairly. However, when the circumstances do not require such uniform
(even if somewhat blind) test procedures, the test protocol might be optimized according to the intended
purpose. This consideration is particularly applicable when the tests are conducted for research purposes
rather than product qualification.
WIDE-BAND CURRENT TRANSDUCERS
Wide-band current transducers (giving a voltage signal in response to a current) make it possible to record
high-frequency transient currents. Some considerations on the use of such devices are listed below.
One major advantage of transducers based on a current transformer with integral burden (thus producing a
voltage signal) is that they provide complete isolation between the power circuit being monitored and the
monitoring instrument. Artifacts associated with ground loops are thus avoided. The current transformer is
generally constructed for one-turn primary configuration, either with a window trough which the conductor

Page 11
can be threaded, or with a split, clamp-on core. The latter offers the advantage of an easy insertion with no
interruption of power to the loads.
Current-time product (IT Max) – Magnetic cores have a flux-carrying capacity which is dependent upon their
size and upon the magnetic material used. When this capacity is reached, the core becomes saturated and the
transformer output will quickly drop to zero. This saturation can also occur if the current contains a DC
component. The current-time product, divided by the pulse width yields the maximum current which can be
measured without saturating the core.
Rise time and droop – When a current transformer is used to measure an ideal rectangular pulse, the observed
output will fall with time. The rate of this fall-off is called droop. High permeability material used in wide-band
transformers reduces this effect considerably. The voltage signal output, when displayed on an oscilloscope,
will be a faithful reproduction of the actual current waveform, within the limitations of rise time and droop
specified for the particular model used. The voltage amplitude will be related, on a linear basis, to the current
amplitude by the sensitivity in volts-per-ampere. For wide-band transformers used in recording high-frequency
transients, typical values of the rise time (10%-90%) are in the range of 2 ns to 200 ns. Typical droop values
range from 0.1% per us to 0.5% per ms.

Page 12
RMS VOLTAGE ENVELOPE ASSESSMENT
BACKGROUND
The basic reason for measuring transients is to compare measured values with those used to verify the
immunity of electrical and electronic equipment connected to the distribution system. In its continuing effort
to understand power line disturbances in relation to the reliability of sensitive electronic systems, the
information technology industry developed a voltage envelope tolerance based on a combination of test
results. Responding to a need for equipment immunity standards, these voltage envelope tolerances, now
incorporated into some IEEE Standards [IEEE Std 446], have been used as the basic reference in many power
quality assessment surveys. This subclause describes one technique used to compare the recorded transient
with one voltage envelope tolerance specification.
WINDOW WIDTH AND SAMPLING RATE
Measurement instrumentation needs a four-cycle window width of recorded data in order to analyse the
voltage envelope of wave-forms and to compare their results with the CBEMA curve specification. A minimum
sampling rate of 18 kilosamples per second is recommended to record this type of low-frequency transient to
measure intervals above 0.01 cycle. To provide reproducibility of the measurement, an anti-aliasing filter with
cut-off frequency (-3 db fourth order) at 5 kHz is recommended.
VOLTAGE ENVELOPE
The voltage envelope consists of a curve showing the severity of the disturbances as momentary rms voltage
deviations from the declared voltage that lasts a certain period of time. The declared voltage is the nominal
voltage of the power system. The root-mean-square of the sampled values is used to assess the rms voltage
envelope over an interval exceeding 0.01 cycle.
The aim of the voltage-envelope analysis is to identify a suitable time that yields the maximum Up for several
intervals T calculated with the equation above. The approach consists of finding this maximum amplitude for
several reference intervals, typically 0.01 cycle, 1 ms, 3 ms, 0.5 s, and steady-state (3 s). During a survey, many
transients are recorded and yield data for each reference interval in order to perform the statistical analysis. In
this manner, the voltage envelope analysis allows assessing the percentile of the voltage envelope of recorded
transients.

Transient overvoltages and currents: detection and measurement

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Transient overvoltages and currents: detection and measurement (20)

More from Bruno De Wachter (18)

Recently uploaded (20)

Transient overvoltages and currents: detection and measurement