SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Repeated Measures (ANOVA)
Conceptual Explanation
How did you get here?
How did you get here?
So, you have decided to use a Repeated
Measures ANOVA.
How did you get here?
So, you have decided to use a Repeated
Measures ANOVA.
Let’s consider the decisions you made to get
here.
First of all, you must have noticed the problem
to be solved deals with generalizing from a
smaller sample to a larger population.
First of all, you must have noticed the problem
to be solved deals with generalizing from a
smaller sample to a larger population.
First of all, you must have noticed the problem
to be solved deals with generalizing from a
smaller sample to a larger population.
Sample of 30
First of all, you must have noticed the problem
to be solved deals with generalizing from a
smaller sample to a larger population.
Sample of 30
First of all, you must have noticed the problem
to be solved deals with generalizing from a
smaller sample to a larger population.
Large Population of 30,000
Sample of 30
First of all, you must have noticed the problem
to be solved deals with generalizing from a
smaller sample to a larger population.
Therefore, you would determine that the
problem deals with inferential not descriptive
statistics.
Large Population of 30,000
Sample of 30
Therefore, you would determine that the
problem deals with inferential not descriptive
statistics.
Therefore, you would determine that the
problem deals with inferential not descriptive
statistics.
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Therefore, you would determine that the
problem deals with inferential not descriptive
statistics.
Inferential Descriptive
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
You would have also noticed that the problem
dealt with questions of difference not
Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of
Fit. Inferential Descriptive
You would have also noticed that the problem
dealt with questions of difference not
Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of
Fit.
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential Descriptive
Difference
You would have also noticed that the problem
dealt with questions of difference not
Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of
Fit.
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential Descriptive
Difference Relationship
You would have also noticed that the problem
dealt with questions of difference not
Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of
Fit.
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential Descriptive
DifferenceDifference Relationship
You would have also noticed that the problem
dealt with questions of difference not
Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of
Fit.
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential Descriptive
Difference Goodness of FitDifference Relationship
After checking the data, you noticed that the
data was ratio/interval rather than extreme
ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male,
female)
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential Descriptive
Difference Goodness of FitDifference Relationship
After checking the data, you noticed that the
data was ratio/interval rather than extreme
ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male,
female)
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
Ratio/Interval
Difference Relationship
After checking the data, you noticed that the
data was ratio/interval rather than extreme
ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male,
female)
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
OrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship
After checking the data, you noticed that the
data was ratio/interval rather than extreme
ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male,
female)
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship
The distribution was more or less normal rather
than skewed or kurtotic.
The distribution was more or less normal rather
than skewed or kurtotic.
The distribution was more or less normal rather
than skewed or kurtotic.
The distribution was more or less normal rather
than skewed or kurtotic.
The distribution was more or less normal rather
than skewed or kurtotic.
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
Skewed
NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship
The distribution was more or less normal rather
than skewed or kurtotic.
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
Skewed Kurtotic
NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship
The distribution was more or less normal rather
than skewed or kurtotic.
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
Skewed Kurtotic Normal
NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
DV #1
Chemistry
Test Scores
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
DV #1 DV #2
Chemistry
Test Scores
Class
Attendance
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
DV #1 DV #2 DV #3
Chemistry
Test Scores
Class
Attendance
Homework
Completed
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
Inferential Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
Skewed Kurtotic Normal
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
Skewed Kurtotic Normal
1 DV
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential
NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship
Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
Inferential Descriptive
Difference Relationship Difference Goodness of Fit
Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal
Skewed Kurtotic Normal
1 DV 2+ DV
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
IV #1
Use of Innovative
eBook
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
IV #1 IV #2
Use of Innovative
eBook
Doing Homework
to Classical Music
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
IV #1 IV #2 IV #3
Use of Innovative
eBook
Doing Homework
to Classical Music
Gender
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
IV #1 IV #2 IV #3
Use of Innovative
eBook
Doing Homework
to Classical Music
Gender
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist.
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist. Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
Skewed Kurtotic Normal
1 DV 2+ DV
Inferential
NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist. Inferential Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
Skewed Kurtotic Normal
1 DV 2+ DV
1 IV
Inferential
NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist. Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
Nominal
Skewed Kurtotic Normal
1 DV 2+ DV
1 IV 2+ IV
Inferential
NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship Difference
Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than
two or more exist. Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
Skewed Kurtotic Normal
1 DV 2+ DV
1 IV 2+ IV
Double check your
problem to see if
that is the case
Inferential
NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship Difference
There are three levels of the Independent
Variable (IV) rather than just two levels. Note –
even though repeated measures ANOVA can
analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed
using a paired sample t-test.
There are three levels of the Independent
Variable (DV) rather than just two levels. Note –
even though repeated measures ANOVA can
analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed
using a paired sample t-test.
Level 1
Before using the
innovative ebook
There are three levels of the Independent
Variable (DV) rather than just two levels. Note –
even though repeated measures ANOVA can
analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed
using a paired sample t-test.
Level 1 Level 2
Before using the
innovative ebook
Using the
innovative ebook
for 2 months
There are three levels of the Independent
Variable (DV) rather than just two levels. Note –
even though repeated measures ANOVA can
analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed
using a paired sample t-test.
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Before using the
innovative ebook
Using the
innovative ebook
for 2 months
Using the
innovative ebook
for 4 months
Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
Skewed Kurtotic Normal
1 DV 2+ DVs
2+ IVs
Inferential
NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship
2 levels 3+ levels
1 IV
Difference
The samples are repeated rather than
independent. Notice that the same class (Chem
100 section 003) is repeatedly tested.
The samples are repeated rather than
independent. Notice that the same class (Chem
100 section 003) is repeatedly tested.
Chem 100
Section 003
January
Chem 100
Section 003
March
Chem 100
Section 003
May
Before using
the innovative
ebook
Using the
innovative ebook
for 2 months
Using the
innovative ebook
for 4 months
Descriptive
Difference Goodness of Fit
Skewed Kurtotic Normal
1 DV 2+ DVs
2+ IVs
Inferential
NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval
Difference Relationship
2 levels 3+ levels
1 IV
Difference
RepeatedIndependent
If this was the appropriate path for your
problem then you have correctly selected
Repeated-measures ANOVA to solve the
problem you have been presented.
Repeated Measures ANOVA –
Repeated Measures ANOVA –
Another use of analysis of variance is to test
whether a single group of people change over
time.
Repeated Measures ANOVA –
Another use of analysis of variance is to test
whether a single group of people change over
time.
In this case, the distributions that are compared
to each other are not from different groups
In this case, the distributions that are compared
to each other are not from different groups
versus
Group 1 Group 2
In this case, the distributions that are compared
to each other are not from different groups
versus
Group 1 Group 2
In this case, the distributions that are compared
to each other are not from different groups
But from different times.
versus
Group 1 Group 2
In this case, the distributions that are compared
to each other are not from different groups
But from different times.
versus
Group 1 Group 2
Group 1 Group 1:
Two Months Later
versus
For example, an instructor might administer the
same test three times throughout the semester
to ascertain whether students are improving in
their skills.
For example, an instructor might administer the
same test three times throughout the semester
to ascertain whether students are improving in
their skills.
January February
April
Exam 1
Exam 2
Exam 3
For example, an instructor might administer the
same test three times throughout the semester
to ascertain whether students are improving in
their skills.
The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are
differences somewhere among three time
periods.
January February
April
Exam 1
Exam 2
Exam 3
For example, an instructor might administer the
same test three times throughout the semester
to ascertain whether students are improving in
their skills.
The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are
differences somewhere among three time
periods.
January February
April
Exam 1
Exam 2
Exam 3
For example, an instructor might administer the
same test three times throughout the semester
to ascertain whether students are improving in
their skills.
The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are
differences somewhere among three time
periods.
January February
April
Exam 1
Exam 2
Exam 3
Average
Score
Average
Score
Average
Score
For example, an instructor might administer the
same test three times throughout the semester
to ascertain whether students are improving in
their skills.
The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are
differences somewhere among three time
periods.
January February
April
Exam 1
Exam 2
Exam 3
Average
Score
Average
Score
Average
Score
For example, an instructor might administer the
same test three times throughout the semester
to ascertain whether students are improving in
their skills.
The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are
differences somewhere among three time
periods.
January February
April
Exam 1
Exam 2
Exam 3
Average
Score
Average
Score
Average
Score
There is a
difference but
we don’t
know where
Post hoc tests will reveal exactly where the
differences occurred.
Post hoc tests will reveal exactly where the
differences occurred.
January February
April
Exam 1
Exam 2
Exam 3
Average
Score 35
Average
Score 38
Average
Score 40
Post hoc tests will reveal exactly where the
differences occurred.
January February
April
Exam 1
Exam 2
Exam 3
Average
Score 35
Average
Score 38
Average
Score 40
There is a
statistically
significant
difference only
between Exam 1
and Exam 3
In contrast, with the One-way analysis of
Variance (ANOVA) we were attempting to
determine if there was a statistical difference
between 2 or more (generally 3 or more)
groups.
In contrast, with the One-way analysis of
Variance (ANOVA) we were attempting to
determine if there was a statistical difference
between 2 or more (generally 3 or more)
groups.
In our One-way ANOVA example in another
presentation we attempted to determine if
there was any statistically significant difference
in the amount of Pizza Slices consumed by three
different player types (football, basketball, and
soccer).
The data would be set up thus:
The data would be set up thus:
Football
Players
Pizza
Slices
Consumed
Basketball
Players
Pizza Slices
Consumed
Soccer
Players
Pizza Slices
Consumed
Ben 5 Cam 6 Dan 5
Bob 7 Colby 4 Denzel 8
Bud 8 Conner 8 Dilbert 8
Bubba 9 Custer 4 Don 1
Burt 10 Cyan 2 Dylan 2
The data would be set up thus:
Notice how the individuals in these groups are
different (hence different names)
Football
Players
Pizza
Slices
Consumed
Basketball
Players
Pizza Slices
Consumed
Soccer
Players
Pizza Slices
Consumed
Ben 5 Cam 6 Dan 5
Bob 7 Colby 4 Denzel 8
Bud 8 Conner 8 Dilbert 8
Bubba 9 Custer 4 Don 1
Burt 10 Cyan 2 Dylan 2
The data would be set up thus:
Notice how the individuals in these groups are
different (hence different names)
Football
Players
Pizza
Slices
Consumed
Basketball
Players
Pizza Slices
Consumed
Soccer
Players
Pizza Slices
Consumed
Ben 5 Cam 6 Dan 5
Bob 7 Colby 4 Denzel 8
Bud 8 Conner 8 Dilbert 8
Bubba 9 Custer 4 Don 1
Burt 10 Cyan 2 Dylan 2
The data would be set up thus:
Notice how the individuals in these groups are
different (hence different names)
A Repeated Measures ANOVA is different than a
One-Way ANOVA in one simply way: Only one
group of person or observations is being
measured, but they are measured more than
one time.
Football
Players
Pizza
Slices
Consumed
Basketball
Players
Pizza Slices
Consumed
Soccer
Players
Pizza Slices
Consumed
Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5
Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8
Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8
Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1
Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2
The data would be set up thus:
Notice how the individuals in these groups are
different (hence different names)
A Repeated Measures ANOVA is different than a
One-Way ANOVA in one simply way: Only one
group of persons or observations is being
measured, but they are measured more than
one time.
Football
Players
Pizza
Slices
Consumed
Basketball
Players
Pizza Slices
Consumed
Soccer
Players
Pizza Slices
Consumed
Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5
Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8
Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8
Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1
Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2
Notice the different times football player pizza
consumption is being measured.
Football
Players
Pizza
Slices
Consumed
Pizza Slices
Consumed
Pizza Slices
Consumed
Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5
Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8
Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8
Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1
Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2
Notice the different times football player pizza
consumption is being measured.
Football
Players
Pizza
Slices
Consumed
Before the
Season
Pizza Slices
Consumed
During the
Season
Pizza Slices
Consumed
After the
Season
Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5
Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8
Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8
Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1
Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2
Since only one group is being measured 3 times,
each time is dependent on the previous time.
By dependent we mean there is a relationship.
Since only one group is being measured 3 times,
each time is dependent on the previous time.
By dependent we mean there is a relationship.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Since only one group is being measured 3 times,
each time is dependent on the previous time.
By dependent we mean there is a relationship.
The relationship between the scores is that we
are comparing the same person across multiple
observations.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and
after-season scores have one important thing in
common:
So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and
after-season scores have one important thing in
common:
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and
after-season scores have one important thing in
common: THESE SCORES ALL BELONG TO BEN.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and
after-season scores have one important thing in
common: THESE SCORES ALL BELONG TO BEN.
They are subject to all the factors that are
special to Ben when consuming pizza, including
how much he likes or dislikes, the toppings that
are available, the eating atmosphere, etc.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
What we want to find out is – how much the
BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza
consuming sessions differ.
What we want to find out is – how much the
BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza
consuming sessions differ.
But we have to find a way to eliminate the
variability that is caused by individual
differences that linger across all three eating
sessions. Once again we are not interested in
the things that make Ben, Ben while eating pizza
(like he’s a picky eater). We are interested in the
effect of where we are in the season (BEFORE,
DURING, and AFTER on Pizza consumption.)
What we want to find out is – how much the
BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza
consuming sessions differ.
But we have to find a way to eliminate the
variability that is caused by individual
differences that linger across all three eating
sessions. Once again we are not interested in
the things that make Ben, Ben while eating pizza
(like he’s a picky eater). We are interested in the
effect of where we are in the season (BEFORE,
DURING, and AFTER on Pizza consumption.)
What we want to find out is – how much the
BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza
consuming sessions differ.
But we have to find a way to eliminate the
variability that is caused by individual
differences that linger across all three eating
sessions. Once again we are not interested in
the things that make Ben, Ben while eating pizza
(like he’s a picky eater). We are interested in the
effect of where we are in the season (BEFORE,
DURING, and AFTER on Pizza consumption.)
That way we can focus just on the differences
that are related to WHEN the pizza eating
occurred.
That way we can focus just on the differences
that are related to WHEN the pizza eating
occurred.
After running a repeated-measures ANOVA, this
is the output that we will get:
That way we can focus just on the differences
that are related to WHEN the pizza eating
occurred.
After running a repeated-measures ANOVA, this
is the output that we will get:
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices
Source
Type III
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
This output will help us determine if we reject
the null hypothesis:
This output will help us determine if we reject
the null hypothesis:
There is no significant difference in the amount
of pizza consumed by football players before,
during, and/or after the season.
This output will help us determine if we reject
the null hypothesis:
There is no significant difference in the amount
of pizza consumed by football players before,
during, and/or after the season.
Or accept the alternative hypothesis:
This output will help us determine if we reject
the null hypothesis:
There is no significant difference in the amount
of pizza consumed by football players before,
during, and/or after the season.
Or accept the alternative hypothesis:
There is a significant difference in the amount of
pizza consumed by football players before,
during, and/or after the season.
To do so, let’s focus on the value .008
To do so, let’s focus on the value .008
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
To do so, let’s focus on the value .008
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure:
Pizza slices
consumed
Source
Type III
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
To do so, let’s focus on the value .008
This means that if we were to reject the null
hypothesis, the probability that we would be
wrong is 8 times out of 1000. As you remember,
if that were to happen, it would be called a Type
1 error.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure:
Pizza slices
consumed
Source
Type III
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
To do so, let’s focus on the value .008
This means that if we were to reject the null
hypothesis, the probability that we would be
wrong is 8 times out of 1000. As you remember,
if that were to happen, it would be called a Type
1 error.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure:
Pizza slices
consumed
Source
Type III
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
But it is so unlikely, that we would be willing to
take that risk and hence reject the null
hypothesis.
But it is so unlikely, that we would be willing to
take that risk and hence we reject the null
hypothesis.
There IS NO statistically significant difference
between the number of slices of pizza
consumed by football players before, during, or
after the football season.
But it is so unlikely, that we would be willing to
take that risk and hence we reject the null
hypothesis.
There IS NO statistically significant difference
between the number of slices of pizza
consumed by football players before, during, or
after the football season.
And accept the alternative hypothesis:
And accept the alternative hypothesis:
There IS A statistically significant difference
between the number of slices of pizza
consumed by football players before, during, or
after the football season.
And accept the alternative hypothesis:
There IS A statistically significant difference
between the number of slices of pizza
consumed by football players before, during, or
after the football season.
Now we do not know which of the three are
significantly different from one another or if all
three are different. We just know that a
difference exists.
Now we do not know which of the three are
significantly different from one another or if all
three are different. We just know that a
difference exists.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Now we do not know which of the three are
significantly different from one another or if all
three are different. We just know that a
difference exists.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Now we do not know which of the three are
significantly different from one another or if all
three are different. We just know that a
difference exists.
Later, we can run what is called a “Post-hoc” test
to determine where the difference lies.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
From this point on – we will delve into the
actual calculations and formulas that produce a
Repeated-measures ANOVA. If such detail is of
interest or a necessity to know, please continue.
How was a significance value of .008 calculated?
How was a significance value of .008 calculated?
Let’s begin with the calculation of the various
sources of Sums of Squares
How was a significance value of .008 calculated?
Let’s begin with the calculation of the various
sources of Sums of Squares
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure:
Pizza slices
consumed
Source
Type III
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between
Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
We do this so that we can explain what is
causing the scores to vary or deviate.
We do this so that we can explain what is
causing the scores to vary or deviate.
• Is it error?
We do this so that we can explain what is
causing the scores to vary or deviate.
• Is it error?
• Is it differences between times (before,
during, and after)?
We do this so that we can explain what is
causing the scores to vary or deviate.
• Is it error?
• Is it differences between times (before,
during, and after)?
Remember, the full name for sum of squares is
the sum of squared deviations about the mean.
This will help us determine the amount of
variation from each of the possible sources.
Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of
squares.
Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of
squares.
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2
Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of
squares.
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2
Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of
squares.
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2
This means one pizza
eating observation for
person “I” (e.g., Ben) on
time “j” (e.g., before)
For example:
For example:
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
For example:
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
For example:
OR
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
For example:
OR
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
For example:
OR
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
For example:
OR
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
For example:
OR
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
For example:
ETC
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2
This means the
average of all of the
observations
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2
This means the
average of all of the
observations
This means one pizza
eating observation for
person “I” (e.g., Ben) on
time “j” (e.g., before)
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2
This means the
average of all of the
observations
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
This means one pizza
eating observation for
person “I” (e.g., Ben) on
time “j” (e.g., before)
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2
This means the
average of all of the
observations
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Average of All
Observations
This means one pizza
eating observation for
person “I” (e.g., Ben) on
time “j” (e.g., before)
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2
This means
sum or add
everything up
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2
This means
sum or add
everything up
This means
the average of
all of the
observations
𝑿𝑿
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2
This means
sum or add
everything up
This means
the average of
all of the
observations
This means one pizza
eating observation for
person “I” (e.g., Ben) on
time “j” (e.g., before)
Let’s calculate total sums of squares with this
data set:
Let’s calculate total sums of squares with this
data set:
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football Players Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each of these
values from the grand mean,
square the result and sum them
all up.
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each of these
values from the grand mean,
square the result and sum them
all up.
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each of these
values from the grand mean,
square the result and sum them
all up.
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2
Each
observation
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each of these
values from the grand mean,
square the result and sum them
all up.
Here is how we compute the
Grand Mean =
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each of these
values from the grand mean,
square the result and sum them
all up.
Here is how we compute the
Grand Mean =
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each of these
values from the grand mean,
square the result and sum them
all up.
Here is how we compute the
Grand Mean =
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each of these
values from the grand mean,
square the result and sum them
all up.
Here is how we compute the
Grand Mean =
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Average of All
Observations =
6.3
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each of these
values from the grand mean,
square the result and sum them
all up.
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5 -
Bob Before 7 -
Bud Before 8 -
Bubba Before 9 -
Burt Before 10 -
Ben During 4 -
Bob During 5 -
Bud During 7 -
Bubba During 8 -
Burt During 7 -
Ben After 4 -
Bob After 5 -
Bud After 6 -
Bubba After 4 -
Burt After 6 -
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each of these
values from the grand mean,
square the result and sum them
all up.
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5 -
Bob Before 7 -
Bud Before 8 -
Bubba Before 9 -
Burt Before 10 -
Ben During 4 -
Bob During 5 -
Bud During 7 -
Bubba During 8 -
Burt During 7 -
Ben After 4 -
Bob After 5 -
Bud After 6 -
Bubba After 4 -
Burt After 6 -
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2
𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each of
these values from the
grand mean, square the
result and sum them all
up.
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5 -
Bob Before 7 -
Bud Before 8 -
Bubba Before 9 -
Burt Before 10 -
Ben During 4 -
Bob During 5 -
Bud During 7 -
Bubba During 8 -
Burt During 7 -
Ben After 4 -
Bob After 5 -
Bud After 6 -
Bubba After 4 -
Burt After 6 -
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Ben Before 5 - 6.3
Bob Before 7 - 6.3
Bud Before 8 - 6.3
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3
Burt Before 10 - 6.3
Ben During 4 - 6.3
Bob During 5 - 6.3
Bud During 7 - 6.3
Bubba During 8 - 6.3
Burt During 7 - 6.3
Ben After 4 - 6.3
Bob After 5 - 6.3
Bud After 6 - 6.3
Bubba After 4 - 6.3
Burt After 6 - 6.3
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each
of these values from
the grand mean,
square the result and
sum them all up.
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5 -
Bob Before 7 -
Bud Before 8 -
Bubba Before 9 -
Burt Before 10 -
Ben During 4 -
Bob During 5 -
Bud During 7 -
Bubba During 8 -
Burt During 7 -
Ben After 4 -
Bob After 5 -
Bud After 6 -
Bubba After 4 -
Burt After 6 -
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Ben Before 5 - 6.3
Bob Before 7 - 6.3
Bud Before 8 - 6.3
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3
Burt Before 10 - 6.3
Ben During 4 - 6.3
Bob During 5 - 6.3
Bud During 7 - 6.3
Bubba During 8 - 6.3
Burt During 7 - 6.3
Ben After 4 - 6.3
Bob After 5 - 6.3
Bud After 6 - 6.3
Bubba After 4 - 6.3
Burt After 6 - 6.3
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 =
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 =
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 =
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 =
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 =
Ben During 4 - 6.3 =
Bob During 5 - 6.3 =
Bud During 7 - 6.3 =
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 =
Burt During 7 - 6.3 =
Ben After 4 - 6.3 =
Bob After 5 - 6.3 =
Bud After 6 - 6.3 =
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 =
Burt After 6 - 6.3 =
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each
of these values from
the grand mean,
square the result and
sum them all up.
Football
Players
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Ben
Bob
Bud
Bubba
Burt
Football
Players
Season
Ben Before
Bob Before
Bud Before
Bubba Before
Burt Before
Ben During
Bob During
Bud During
Bubba During
Burt During
Ben After
Bob After
Bud After
Bubba After
Burt After
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5
Bob Before 7
Bud Before 8
Bubba Before 9
Burt Before 10
Ben During 4
Bob During 5
Bud During 7
Bubba During 8
Burt During 7
Ben After 4
Bob After 5
Bud After 6
Bubba After 4
Burt After 6
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Ben Before 5 -
Bob Before 7 -
Bud Before 8 -
Bubba Before 9 -
Burt Before 10 -
Ben During 4 -
Bob During 5 -
Bud During 7 -
Bubba During 8 -
Burt During 7 -
Ben After 4 -
Bob After 5 -
Bud After 6 -
Bubba After 4 -
Burt After 6 -
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Ben Before 5 - 6.3
Bob Before 7 - 6.3
Bud Before 8 - 6.3
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3
Burt Before 10 - 6.3
Ben During 4 - 6.3
Bob During 5 - 6.3
Bud During 7 - 6.3
Bubba During 8 - 6.3
Burt During 7 - 6.3
Ben After 4 - 6.3
Bob After 5 - 6.3
Bud After 6 - 6.3
Bubba After 4 - 6.3
Burt After 6 - 6.3
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 =
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 =
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 =
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 =
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 =
Ben During 4 - 6.3 =
Bob During 5 - 6.3 =
Bud During 7 - 6.3 =
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 =
Burt During 7 - 6.3 =
Ben After 4 - 6.3 =
Bob After 5 - 6.3 =
Bud After 6 - 6.3 =
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 =
Burt After 6 - 6.3 =
Football
Players
Season Slices
of Pizza
Grand
Mean
Deviation
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each of these values from the
grand mean, square the result and sum them all
up.
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
We will subtract each of these values from the
grand mean, square the result and sum them all
up.
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
= 49.3
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
Then –
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
= 49.3
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
Then – we place the total sums of squares result
in the ANOVA table.
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
= 49.3
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
Then – we place the total sums of squares result
in the ANOVA table.
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
= 49.3
Then – we place the total sums of squares result
in the ANOVA table.
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
= 49.3
Then – we place the total sums of squares result
in the ANOVA table.
Football
Players
Season Slices of
Pizza
Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1
Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4
Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8
Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4
Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8
Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4
Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
= 49.3Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
We have now calculated the total sums of
squares. This is a good starting point. Because
now we want to know of that total sums of
squares how many sums of squares are
generated from the following sources:
We have now calculated the total sums of
squares. This is a good starting point. Because
now we want to know of that total sums of
squares how many sums of squares are
generated from the following sources:
• Between subjects (this is the variance we
want to eliminate)
We have now calculated the total sums of
squares. This is a good starting point. Because
now we want to know of that total sums of
squares how many sums of squares are
generated from the following sources:
• Between subjects (this is the variance we
want to eliminate)
• Between Groups (this would be between
BEFORE, DURING, AFTER)
We have now calculated the total sums of
squares. This is a good starting point. Because
now we want to know of that total sums of
squares how many sums of squares are
generated from the following sources:
• Between subjects (this is the variance we
want to eliminate)
• Between Groups (this would be between
BEFORE, DURING, AFTER)
• Error (the variance that we cannot explain
with our design)
With these sums of squares we will be able to
compute our F ratio value and then statistical
significance.
With these sums of squares we will be able to
compute our F ratio value and then statistical
significance.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
With these sums of squares we will be able to
compute our F ratio value and then statistical
significance.
Let’s calculate the sums of squares between
subjects.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Remember if we were just computing a one way
ANOVA the table would go from this:
Remember if we were just computing a one way
ANOVA the table would go from this:
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Remember if we were just computing a one way
ANOVA the table would go from this:
To this:
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Remember if we were just computing a one way
ANOVA the table would go from this:
To this:
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 2.669 .078
Error 29.600 8 3.700
Total 49.333 14
Remember if we were just computing a one way
ANOVA the table would go from this:
To this:
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 2.669 .078
Error 29.600 8 3.700
Total 49.333 14
All of that variability goes into the error or
within groups sums of squares (29.600) which
makes the F statistic smaller (from 9.548 to
2.669), the significance value no longer
significant (.008 to .078).
All of that variability goes into the error or
within groups sums of squares (29.600) which
makes the F statistic smaller (from 9.548 to
2.669), the significance value no longer
significant (.008 to .078).
But the difference in within groups variability is
not a function of error, it is a function of Ben,
Bob, Bud, Bubba, and Burt’s being different in
terms of the amount of slices they eat regardless
of when they eat!
All of that variability goes into the error or
within groups sums of squares (29.600) which
makes the F statistic smaller (from 9.548 to
2.669), the significance value no longer
significant (.008 to .078).
But the difference in within groups variability is
not a function of error, it is a function of Ben,
Bob, Bud, Bubba, and Burt’s being different in
terms of the amount of slices they eat regardless
of when they eat!
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average
Ben 5 4 4 4.3
Bob 7 5 5 5.7
Bud 8 7 6 7.0
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0
Burt 10 7 6 7.7
Here is a data set where there are not between
group differences, but there is a lot of difference
based on when the group eats their pizza:
Here is a data set where there are not between
group differences, but there is a lot of difference
based on when the group eats their pizza:
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average
Ben 1 5 9 5.0
Bob 2 5 8 5.0
Bud 3 5 7 5.0
Bubba 1 5 9 5.0
Burt 2 5 8 5.0
Here is a data set where there are not between
group differences, but there is a lot of difference
based on when the group eats their pizza:
There is no variability between subjects (they
are all 5.0).
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average
Ben 1 5 9 5.0
Bob 2 5 8 5.0
Bud 3 5 7 5.0
Bubba 1 5 9 5.0
Burt 2 5 8 5.0
Look at the variability between groups:
Look at the variability between groups:
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average
Ben 1 5 9 5.0
Bob 2 5 8 5.0
Bud 3 5 7 5.0
Bubba 1 5 9 5.0
Burt 2 5 8 5.0
1.8 5.0 8.2
Look at the variability between groups:
They are very different from one another.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average
Ben 1 5 9 5.0
Bob 2 5 8 5.0
Bud 3 5 7 5.0
Bubba 1 5 9 5.0
Burt 2 5 8 5.0
1.8 5.0 8.2
Here is what the ANOVA table would look like:
Here is what the ANOVA table would look like:
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 0.000 4
Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000
Error 5.600 8 0.700
Total 49.333 14
Here is what the ANOVA table would look like:
Notice how there are no sum of squares values
for the between subjects source of variability!
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 0.000 4
Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000
Error 5.600 8 0.700
Total 49.333 14
Here is what the ANOVA table would look like:
Notice how there are no sum of squares values
for the between subjects source of variability!
But there is a lot of sum of squares values for
the between groups.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 0.000 4
Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000
Error 5.600 8 0.700
Total 49.333 14
Here is what the ANOVA table would look like:
Notice how there are no sum of squares values
for the between subjects source of variability!
But there is a lot of sum of squares values for
the between groups.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 0.000 4
Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000
Error 5.600 8 0.700
Total 49.333 14
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 0.000 4
Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000
Error 5.600 8 0.700
Total 49.333 14
What would the data set look like if there was
very little between groups (by season) variability
and a great deal of between subjects variability:
What would the data set look like if there was
very little between groups (by season) variability
and a great deal of between subjects variability:
Here it is:
What would the data set look like if there was
very little between groups (by season) variability
and a great deal of between subjects variability:
Here it is:
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average
Ben 3 3 3 3.0
Bob 5 5 5 5.0
Bud 7 7 7 7.0
Bubba 8 8 8 8.0
Burt 12 12 13 12.3
Between
Subjects
In this case the between subjects (Ben, Bob, Bud
. . .), are very different.
In this case the between subjects (Ben, Bob, Bud
. . .), are very different.
When you see between SUBJECTS averages that
far away, you know that the sums of squares for
between groups will be very large.
In this case the between subjects (Ben, Bob, Bud
. . .), are very different.
When you see between SUBJECTS averages that
far away, you know that the sums of squares for
between groups will be very large.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 148.267 4
Between Groups 0.133 2 0.067 1.000 .689
Error 0.533 8 0.067
Total 148.933 14
Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between
group (seasons) average how close they are.
Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between
group (seasons) average how close they are.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average
Ben 3 3 3 3.0
Bob 5 5 5 5.0
Bud 7 7 7 7.0
Bubba 8 8 8 8.0
Burt 12 12 13 12.3
7.0 7.0 7.2
Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between
group (seasons) average how close they are.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average
Ben 3 3 3 3.0
Bob 5 5 5 5.0
Bud 7 7 7 7.0
Bubba 8 8 8 8.0
Burt 12 12 13 12.3
7.0 7.0 7.2
Between
Groups
Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between
group (seasons) average how close they are.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average
Ben 3 3 3 3.0
Bob 5 5 5 5.0
Bud 7 7 7 7.0
Bubba 8 8 8 8.0
Burt 12 12 13 12.3
7.0 7.0 7.2
Between
Groups
When you see between group averages this
close you know that the sums of squares for
between groups will be very small.
When you see between group averages this
close you know that the sums of squares for
between groups will be very small.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 148.267 4
Between Groups 0.133 2 0.067 1.000 .689
Error 0.533 8 0.067
Total 148.933 14
When you see between group averages this
close you know that the sums of squares for
between groups will be very small.
Now that we have conceptually considered the
sources of variability as described by the sum of
squares, let’s begin calculating between
subjects, between groups, and the error
sources.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 148.267 4
Between Groups 0.133 2 0.067 1.000 .689
Error 0.533 8 0.067
Total 148.933 14
We will begin with calculating Between Subjects
sum of squares.
We will begin with calculating Between Subjects
sum of squares.
To do so, let’s return to our original data set:
We will begin with calculating Between Subjects
sum of squares.
To do so, let’s return to our original data set:
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
We will begin with calculating Between Subjects
sum of squares.
To do so, let’s return to our original data set:
Here is the formula for calculating SS between
subjects.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
We will begin with calculating Between Subjects
sum of squares.
To do so, let’s return to our original data set:
Here is the formula for calculating SS between
subjects.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑋 𝑏𝑠 − 𝑋)2
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average
Ben 5 4 4 4.3
Bob 7 5 5 5.7
Bud 8 7 6 7.0
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0
Burt 10 7 6 7.7
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average
Ben 5 4 4 4.3
Bob 7 5 5 5.7
Bud 8 7 6 7.0
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0
Burt 10 7 6 7.7
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
This means the
average of between
subjects
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 -
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 -
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 -
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 -
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 -
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
This means the
average of all of
the observations
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Average of All
Observations =
6.3
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
Now we subtract each subject or person average
from the Grand Mean.
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
Now we subtract each subject or person average
from the Grand Mean.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus Grand
Mean
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3
This means the
average of all of
the observations
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
Now we subtract each subject or person average
from the Grand Mean.
This gives us the person’s average score
deviation from the total or grand mean.
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
Now we subtract each subject or person average
from the Grand Mean.
This gives us the person’s average score
deviation from the total or grand mean.Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus Grand
Mean
Deviation
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
Now we subtract each subject or person average
from the Grand Mean.
This gives us the person’s average score
deviation from the total or grand mean.
Now we will square the deviations.
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
Now we subtract each subject or person average
from the Grand Mean.
This gives us the person’s average score
deviation from the total or grand mean.
Now we will square the deviations.
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
Now we subtract each subject or person average
from the Grand Mean.
This gives us the person’s average score
deviation from the total or grand mean.
Now we will square the deviations
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before
the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
Now we subtract each subject or person average
from the Grand Mean.
This gives us the person’s average score
deviation from the total or grand mean.
Now we will square the deviations.
Then we sum all of these squared deviations.
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
Now we subtract each subject or person average
from the Grand Mean.
This gives us the person’s average score
deviation from the total or grand mean.
Now we will square the deviations.
Then we sum all of these squared deviations.
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
Now we subtract each subject or person average
from the Grand Mean.
This gives us the person’s average score
deviation from the total or grand mean.
Now we will square the deviations.
Then we sum all of these squared deviations.
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before
the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
7.1
Sum
up
Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
Now we subtract each subject or person average
from the Grand Mean.
This gives us the person’s average score
deviation from the total or grand mean.
Now we will square the deviations.
Then we sum all of these squared deviations.
Finally, we multiply the sum all of these squared
deviations by the number of groups:
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before
the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
7.1
Times 3 groups
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before
the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
7.1
Times 3 groups
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
Number of
conditions
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before
the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
7.1
Times 3 groups
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before
the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
7.1
Times 3 groups
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before
the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
7.1
Times 3 groups
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
1 2 3
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before
the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
7.1
Times 3 groups
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
1 2 3
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before
the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
7.1
Times 3 groups
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
1 2 3
𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before
the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average minus Grand
Mean
Deviation Squared
Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9
Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4
Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5
Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
7.1
Times 3 groups
Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
1 2 3
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza slices consumed
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Now it is time to compute the between groups
(seasons) sum of squares.
Now it is time to compute the between groups’
(seasons) sum of squares.
Here is the equation we will use to compute it:
Now it is time to compute the between groups’
(seasons) sum of squares.
Here is the equation we will use to compute it:
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
Let’s break this down with our data set:
Let’s break this down with our data set:
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
Let’s break this down with our data set:
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
We begin by computing the mean of each
condition (k)
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
We begin by computing the mean of each
condition (k)
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8
We begin by computing the mean of each
condition (k)
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8
We begin by computing the mean of each
condition (k)
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8
We begin by computing the mean of each
condition (k)
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2 5.0
Then subtract each condition mean from the
grand mean.
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2 5.0
Then subtract each condition mean from the
grand mean.
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2 5.0
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2 5.0
minus - - -
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2 5.0
minus - - -
Grand
Mean
6.3 6.3 6.3
Then subtract each condition mean from the
grand mean.
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2 5.0
minus - - -
Grand
Mean
6.3 6.3 6.3
equals
Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3
Then subtract each condition mean from the
grand mean.
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
Square the deviation.
𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) 𝟐
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2 5.0
minus - - -
Grand
Mean
6.3 6.3 6.3
equals
Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3
Squared
Deviation
2.2 0.0 1.8
Sum the Squared Deviations:
Sum the Squared Deviations: 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) 𝟐
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2 5.0
minus - - -
Grand
Mean
6.3 6.3 6.3
equals
Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3
Squared
Deviation
2.2 0.0 1.8
Sum
Sum the Squared Deviations: 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) 𝟐
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
Condition
Mean
7.8 6.2 5.0
minus - - -
Grand
Mean
6.3 6.3 6.3
equals
Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3
Squared
Deviation
2.2 0.0 1.8
Sum
Sum the Squared Deviations: 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) 𝟐
3.95
Sum of Squared
Deviations
Multiply by the number of observations per
condition (number of pizza eating slices across
before, during, and after).
Multiply by the number of observations per
condition (number of pizza eating slices across
before, during, and after).
3.95
Sum of Squared
Deviations
Multiply by the number of observations per
condition (number of pizza eating slices across
before, during, and after).
3.95
Sum of Squared
Deviations
Multiply by the number of observations per
condition (number of pizza eating slices across
before, during, and after).
3.95
Sum of Squared
Deviations
5
Number of
observations
Multiply by the number of observations per
condition (number of pizza eating slices across
before, during, and after).
3.95
Sum of Squared
Deviations
5
Number of
observations
Multiply by the number of observations per
condition (number of pizza eating slices across
before, during, and after).
3.95
Sum of Squared
Deviations
5
Number of
observations
19.7
Weighted Sum of
Squared Deviations
Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the
weighted sum of squared deviations.
Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the
weighted sum of squared deviations.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the
weighted sum of squared deviations.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
3.95
Sum of Squared
Deviations
5
Number of
observations
19.7
Weighted Sum of
Squared Deviations
Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the
weighted sum of squared deviations.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
3.95
Sum of Squared
Deviations
5
Number of
observations
19.7
Weighted Sum of
Squared Deviations
So far we have calculated Total Sum of Squares
along with Sum of Squares for Between
Subjects, and Between Groups.
So far we have calculated Total Sum of Squares
along with Sum of Squares along with Sum of
Squares for Between Subjects, Between Groups.
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Now we will calculate the sum of squares
associated with Error.
Now we will calculate the sum of squares
associated with Error.
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
To do this we simply add the between subjects
and between groups sums of squares.
To do this we simply add the between subjects
and between groups sums of squares.
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
To do this we simply add the between subjects
and between groups sums of squares.
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
21.333
Between Subjects
Sum of Squares
19.733
Between Groups
Sum of Squares
41.600
Between Subjects &
Groups Sum of
Squares Combined
Then we subtract the Between Subjects & Group
Sum of Squares Combined (41.600) from the
Total Sum of Squares (49.333)
Then we subtract the Between Subjects & Group
Sum of Squares Combined (41.600) from the
Total Sum of Squares (49.333)
49.333
Total Sum of Squares
41.600
Between Subjects &
Groups Sum of Squares
Combined
8.267
Sum of Squares
Attributed to Error
or Unexplained
Then we subtract the Between Subjects & Group
Sum of Squares Combined (41.600) from the
Total Sum of Squares (49.333)
49.333
Total Sum of Squares
41.600
Between Subjects &
Groups Sum of Squares
Combined
8.267
Sum of Squares
Attributed to Error
or Unexplained
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Now we have all of the information necessary to
determine if there is a statistically significant
difference between pizza slices consumed by
football players between three different eating
occasions (before, during or after the season).
Now we have all of the information necessary to
determine if there is a statistically significant
difference between pizza slices consumed by
football players between three different eating
occasions (before, during or after the season).
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
To calculate the significance level
To calculate the significance level
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
We must calculate the F ratio
We must calculate the F ratio
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Which is calculated by dividing the Between
Groups Mean Square value (9.867) by the Error
Mean Square value (1.033).
Which is calculated by dividing the Between
Groups Mean Square value (9.867) by the Error
Mean Square value (1.033).
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
=
Which is calculated by dividing the sum of
squares between groups by its degrees of
freedom, as shown below:
Which is calculated by dividing the sum of
squares between groups by its degrees of
freedom, as shown below:
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
=
Which is calculated by dividing the sum of
squares between groups by its degrees of
freedom, as shown below:
And
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
=
Which is calculated by dividing the sum of
squares between groups by its degrees of
freedom, as shown below:
And
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
=
=
Which is calculated by dividing the sum of
squares between groups by its degrees of
freedom, as shown below:
And
Now we need to figure out how we calculate
degrees of freedom for each source of sums of
squares.
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
=
=
Let’s begin with determining the degrees of
freedom Between Subjects.
Let’s begin with determining the degrees of
freedom Between Subjects.
Let’s begin with determining the degrees of
freedom Between Subjects.
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Let’s begin with determining the degrees of
freedom Between Subjects.
We take the number of subjects which, in this
case, is 5 – 1 = 4
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Let’s begin with determining the degrees of
freedom Between Subjects.
We take the number of subjects which, in this
case, is 5 – 1 = 4
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Let’s begin with determining the degrees of
freedom Between Subjects.
We take the number of subjects which, in this
case, is 5 – 1 = 4
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Average
Ben 3 3 3 3.0
Bob 5 5 5 5.0
Bud 7 7 7 7.0
Bubba 8 8 8 8.0
Burt 12 12 13 12.3
Between
Subjects
1
2
3
4
5
Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of
Freedom (df)
Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of
Freedom (df)
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of
Freedom (df)
We take the number of groups which in this case
is 3 – 1 = 2
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of
Freedom (df)
We take the number of groups which in this case
is 3 – 1 = 2
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of
Freedom (df)
We take the number of groups which in this case
is 3 – 1 = 2
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
1 2 3
Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of
Freedom (df)
We take the number of groups which in this case
is 3 – 1 = 2
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Pizza Slices Consumed
Football
Players
Before the
Season
During the
Season
After the
Season
Ben 5 4 4
Bob 7 5 5
Bud 8 7 6
Bubba 9 8 4
Burt 10 7 6
1 2 3
The error degrees of freedom are calculated by
multiplying the between subjects by the
between groups degrees of freedom.
The error degrees of freedom are calculated by
multiplying the between subjects by the
between groups degrees of freedom.
4
Between Subjects
Degrees of Freedom
2
Between Groups
Degrees of Freedom
8
Error Degrees of
Freedom
The error degrees of freedom are calculated by
multiplying the between subjects by the
between groups degrees of freedom.
4
Between Subjects
Degrees of Freedom
2
Between Groups
Degrees of Freedom
8
Error Degrees of
Freedom
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
The error degrees of freedom are calculated by
multiplying the between subjects by the
between groups degrees of freedom.
4
Between Subjects
Degrees of Freedom
2
Between Groups
Degrees of Freedom
8
Error Degrees of
Freedom
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares
is calculated by adding all of the degrees of
freedom from the other three sources.
The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares
is calculated by adding all of the degrees of
freedom from the other three sources.
4 2 8 14
The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares
is calculated by adding all of the degrees of
freedom from the other three sources.
4 2 8 14
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares
is calculated by adding all of the degrees of
freedom from the other three sources.
4 2 8 14
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
We will compute the Mean Square values for
just the Between Groups and Error. We are not
interested in what is happening with Between
Subjects. We calculated the Between Subjects
sum of squares only take out any differences
that are a function of differences that would
exist regardless of what group we were looking
at.
Once again, if we had not pulled out Between
Subjects sums of squares, then the Between
Subjects would be absorbed in the error value:
Once again, if we had not pulled out Between
Subjects sums of squares, then the Between
Subjects would be absorbed in the error value:
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Once again, if we had not pulled out Between
Subjects sums of squares, then the Between
Subjects would be absorbed in the error value:
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047
Within Groups 29.600 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Once again, if we had not pulled out Between
Subjects sums of squares, then the Between
Subjects would be absorbed in the error value:
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047
Within Groups 29.600 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Once again, if we had not pulled out Between
Subjects sums of squares, then the Between
Subjects would be absorbed in the error value:
Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047
Within Groups 29.600 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Within Groups is
another way of
saying Error
And that would have created a larger error
mean square value:
And that would have created a larger error
mean square value:
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047
Error 29.600 12 2.467
Total 49.333 14
And that would have created a larger error
mean square value:
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047
Error 29.600 12 2.467
Total 49.333 14
Which in turn would have created a smaller F
value:
Which in turn would have created a smaller F
value:
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047
Error 29.600 12 2.467
Total 49.333 14
Which in turn would have created a smaller F
value:
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047
Error 29.600 12 2.467
Total 49.333 14
=
=
Which in turn would have created a larger
significance value:
Which in turn would have created a larger
significance value:
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047
Error 29.600 12 2.467
Total 49.333 14
Which in turn would have created a larger
significance value:
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Measure: Pizza_slices
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047
Error 29.600 12 2.467
Total 49.333 14
=
=
With a larger significance value it makes it less
likely to reject the null hypothesis.
With a larger significance value it makes it less
likely to reject the null hypothesis.
It is for that reason that we calculate the
Between Subjects sums of squares and pull it
out of the error sums of squares to get an
uncontaminated error value…
With a larger significance value it makes it less
likely to reject the null hypothesis.
It is for that reason that we calculate the
Between Subjects sums of squares and pull it
out of the error sums of squares to get an
uncontaminated error value…
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
With a larger significance value it makes it less
likely to reject the null hypothesis.
It is for that reason that we calculate the
Between Subjects sums of squares and pull it
out of the error sums of squares to get an
uncontaminated error value…
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
With a larger significance value it makes it less
likely to reject the null hypothesis.
It is for that reason that we calculate the
Between Subjects sums of squares and pull it
out of the error sums of squares to get an
uncontaminated error value…
And a more accurate F value…
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
With a larger significance value it makes it less
likely to reject the null hypothesis.
It is for that reason that we calculate the
Between Subjects sums of squares and pull it
out of the error sums of squares to get an
uncontaminated error value…
And a more accurate F value…
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
…as well as a more accurate Significance value…
…as well as a more accurate Significance value…
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
…as well as a more accurate Significance value…
Therefore, we will only focus on mean square
values for Between Groups and Error:
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
…as well as a more accurate Significance value…
Therefore, we will only focus on mean square
values for Between Groups and Error:
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
As previously demonstrated, let’s continue with
our calculations by dividing the Between Groups
mean square value (9.867) by the Error mean
square value (1.033).
As previously demonstrated, let’s continue with
our calculations by dividing the Between Groups
mean square value (9.867) by the Error mean
square value (1.033).
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
As previously demonstrated, let’s continue with
our calculations by dividing the Between Groups
mean square value (9.867) by the Error mean
square value (1.033).
Which gives us an F value of 9.548
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
=
Because we are using statistical software we will
also get a significance value of .008. This means
that is we were to theoretically run this
experiment 1000 times we would be wrong to
reject the null hypothesis 8 times this incurring a
type 1 error.
Because we are using statistical software we will
also get a significance value of .008. This means
that is we were to theoretically run this
experiment 1000 times we would be wrong to
reject the null hypothesis 8 times this incurring a
type 1 error.
If we are willing to live with those odds of failure
(8 out of 1000) then we would reject the null
hypothesis.
If we had set our alpha cut off at .05 that would
mean we would be willing to take the risk of
being wrong 50 out of 1000 or 5 out of 100
times.
If we had set our alpha cut off at .05 that would
mean we would be willing to take the risk of
being wrong 50 out of 1000 or 5 out of 100
times.
If we do not get a significance value (.008) then
we could go to the F table to determine if our F
value of 9.548 exceeds the F critical value in the
F table.
This F critical value is located using the degrees
of freedom for error (8) and the degrees of
freedom for between groups (2).
This F critical value is located using the degrees
of freedom for error (8) and the degrees of
freedom for between groups (2).
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Error
df
This F critical value is located using the degrees
of freedom for error (8) and the degrees of
freedom for between groups (2).
This F critical value is located using the degrees
of freedom for error (8) and the degrees of
freedom for between groups (2).
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
BG
df
Now let’s put them together:
Now let’s put them together:
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Now let’s put them together:
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
BG
df
Error
df
Now let’s put them together:
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
BG
df
Error
df
Now let’s put them together:
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
BG
df
Error
df
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Now let’s put them together:
Now let’s put them together:
Since 9.548 exceeds 4.46 at the .05 alpha level,
we will reject the null hypothesis.
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Now let’s put them together:
Since 9.548 exceeds 4.46 at the .05 alpha level,
we will reject the null hypothesis.
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Now let’s put them together:
Since 9.548 exceeds 4.46 at the .05 alpha level,
we will reject the null hypothesis.
Once again, we only show you the table as
another way to determine if you have statistical
significance.
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14
Now let’s put them together:
Since 9.548 exceeds 4.46 at the .05 alpha level,
we will reject the null hypothesis.
Once again, we only show you the table as
another way to determine if you have statistical
significance.
That’s it. You have now seen the inner workings
of Repeated Measures ANOVA.
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
Between Subjects 21.333 4
Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008
Error 8.267 8 1.033
Total 49.333 14

More Related Content

PPTX
Tutorial parametric v. non-parametric
PPTX
Ancova and Mancova
PPTX
Factorial ANOVA
PPTX
T test, independant sample, paired sample and anova
ODP
Multiple Linear Regression II and ANOVA I
PPTX
Z-scores: Location of Scores and Standardized Distributions
PPTX
Repeated anova measures ppt
PPTX
Null hypothesis for a one-way anova
Tutorial parametric v. non-parametric
Ancova and Mancova
Factorial ANOVA
T test, independant sample, paired sample and anova
Multiple Linear Regression II and ANOVA I
Z-scores: Location of Scores and Standardized Distributions
Repeated anova measures ppt
Null hypothesis for a one-way anova

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Inferential statistics powerpoint
PPT
Experimental research design
PPTX
Non parametric presentation
PPTX
What is an independent samples-t test?
PPTX
Multiple linear regression
PPTX
Repeated Measures ANOVA
PPTX
Two-way Mixed Design with SPSS
PPTX
Repeated measures anova with spss
PPT
Descriptive statistics
PPTX
Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
PDF
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
PPT
Anova single factor
PPTX
Measures of Variability
PPT
1 ANOVA.ppt
PPTX
Null hypothesis for Wilcoxon Test
PPTX
One Way ANOVA and Two Way ANOVA using R
PPT
Anova post hoc
PPTX
Analysis Of Variance - ANOVA
PPTX
Parametric & non-parametric
PPT
regression and correlation
Inferential statistics powerpoint
Experimental research design
Non parametric presentation
What is an independent samples-t test?
Multiple linear regression
Repeated Measures ANOVA
Two-way Mixed Design with SPSS
Repeated measures anova with spss
Descriptive statistics
Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Anova single factor
Measures of Variability
1 ANOVA.ppt
Null hypothesis for Wilcoxon Test
One Way ANOVA and Two Way ANOVA using R
Anova post hoc
Analysis Of Variance - ANOVA
Parametric & non-parametric
regression and correlation
Ad

Similar to Tutorial repeated measures ANOVA (20)

PPTX
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
PPT
Reliability and validity
PPTX
What is a one way anova?
PPTX
What is a paired samples t test
DOCX
1 Crosstabs Lesson 1 Running crosstabs to test you.docx
PPTX
Experimental design cartoon part 5 sample size
PPT
Subject-Verb Agreement Presentation English
PPT
sampling experimental
PPT
experimental control
DOCX
BUS 308 Week 3 Lecture 1 Examining Differences - Continued.docx
PPTX
Levels of an independent variable (Practice Set)
PPTX
ANOVA biostat easy explaination .pptx
PPTX
Analysis of Variance
PPT
Experiment basics
PPTX
Central tendency, shape, or symmetry practice problems (2)
PPTX
Research design
PPT
Anova lecture
PPT
designs_151.ppt
PPT
One Way Anova
DOCX
Data.savQuestion.docxOver the same period, determine wheth.docx
What is a one-way repeated measures ANOVA?
Reliability and validity
What is a one way anova?
What is a paired samples t test
1 Crosstabs Lesson 1 Running crosstabs to test you.docx
Experimental design cartoon part 5 sample size
Subject-Verb Agreement Presentation English
sampling experimental
experimental control
BUS 308 Week 3 Lecture 1 Examining Differences - Continued.docx
Levels of an independent variable (Practice Set)
ANOVA biostat easy explaination .pptx
Analysis of Variance
Experiment basics
Central tendency, shape, or symmetry practice problems (2)
Research design
Anova lecture
designs_151.ppt
One Way Anova
Data.savQuestion.docxOver the same period, determine wheth.docx
Ad

More from Ken Plummer (20)

PPTX
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
PPTX
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
PPTX
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
PPTX
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
PPTX
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
PPTX
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
PPTX
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
PPTX
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
PPTX
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
PPTX
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
PPTX
Dichotomous or scaled
PPTX
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
PPTX
Skewed sample size less than 30
PPTX
Ordinal (ties)
PPTX
Ordinal and nominal
PPTX
Relationship covariates
PPTX
Relationship nature of data
PPTX
Number of variables (predictive)
PPTX
Levels of the iv
PPTX
Independent variables (2)
Diff rel gof-fit - jejit - practice (5)
Learn About Range - Copyright updated
Inferential vs descriptive tutorial of when to use - Copyright Updated
Diff rel ind-fit practice - Copyright Updated
Normal or skewed distributions (inferential) - Copyright updated
Normal or skewed distributions (descriptive both2) - Copyright updated
Nature of the data practice - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (spread) - Copyright updated
Mode practice 1 - Copyright updated
Nature of the data (descriptive) - Copyright updated
Dichotomous or scaled
Skewed less than 30 (ties)
Skewed sample size less than 30
Ordinal (ties)
Ordinal and nominal
Relationship covariates
Relationship nature of data
Number of variables (predictive)
Levels of the iv
Independent variables (2)

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
PPTX
PPH.pptx obstetrics and gynecology in nursing
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PPTX
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
PDF
Basic Mud Logging Guide for educational purpose
PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PPTX
The Healthy Child – Unit II | Child Health Nursing I | B.Sc Nursing 5th Semester
PPTX
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
PDF
3rd Neelam Sanjeevareddy Memorial Lecture.pdf
PDF
TR - Agricultural Crops Production NC III.pdf
PDF
FourierSeries-QuestionsWithAnswers(Part-A).pdf
PDF
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
PDF
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
Insiders guide to clinical Medicine.pdf
PDF
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
PDF
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
PPTX
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
PDF
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
PPH.pptx obstetrics and gynecology in nursing
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
Basic Mud Logging Guide for educational purpose
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
The Healthy Child – Unit II | Child Health Nursing I | B.Sc Nursing 5th Semester
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
3rd Neelam Sanjeevareddy Memorial Lecture.pdf
TR - Agricultural Crops Production NC III.pdf
FourierSeries-QuestionsWithAnswers(Part-A).pdf
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Insiders guide to clinical Medicine.pdf
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
Pharma ospi slides which help in ospi learning
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program

Tutorial repeated measures ANOVA

  • 2. How did you get here?
  • 3. How did you get here? So, you have decided to use a Repeated Measures ANOVA.
  • 4. How did you get here? So, you have decided to use a Repeated Measures ANOVA. Let’s consider the decisions you made to get here.
  • 5. First of all, you must have noticed the problem to be solved deals with generalizing from a smaller sample to a larger population.
  • 6. First of all, you must have noticed the problem to be solved deals with generalizing from a smaller sample to a larger population.
  • 7. First of all, you must have noticed the problem to be solved deals with generalizing from a smaller sample to a larger population. Sample of 30
  • 8. First of all, you must have noticed the problem to be solved deals with generalizing from a smaller sample to a larger population. Sample of 30
  • 9. First of all, you must have noticed the problem to be solved deals with generalizing from a smaller sample to a larger population. Large Population of 30,000 Sample of 30
  • 10. First of all, you must have noticed the problem to be solved deals with generalizing from a smaller sample to a larger population. Therefore, you would determine that the problem deals with inferential not descriptive statistics. Large Population of 30,000 Sample of 30
  • 11. Therefore, you would determine that the problem deals with inferential not descriptive statistics.
  • 12. Therefore, you would determine that the problem deals with inferential not descriptive statistics. Double check your problem to see if that is the case
  • 13. Therefore, you would determine that the problem deals with inferential not descriptive statistics. Inferential Descriptive Double check your problem to see if that is the case
  • 14. You would have also noticed that the problem dealt with questions of difference not Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of Fit. Inferential Descriptive
  • 15. You would have also noticed that the problem dealt with questions of difference not Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of Fit. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference
  • 16. You would have also noticed that the problem dealt with questions of difference not Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of Fit. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Relationship
  • 17. You would have also noticed that the problem dealt with questions of difference not Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of Fit. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive DifferenceDifference Relationship
  • 18. You would have also noticed that the problem dealt with questions of difference not Relationships, Independence nor Goodness of Fit. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of FitDifference Relationship
  • 19. After checking the data, you noticed that the data was ratio/interval rather than extreme ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male, female) Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of FitDifference Relationship
  • 20. After checking the data, you noticed that the data was ratio/interval rather than extreme ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male, female) Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Ratio/Interval Difference Relationship
  • 21. After checking the data, you noticed that the data was ratio/interval rather than extreme ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male, female) Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit OrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship
  • 22. After checking the data, you noticed that the data was ratio/interval rather than extreme ordinal (1st, 2nd, 3rd place) or nominal (male, female) Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship
  • 23. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic.
  • 24. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic.
  • 25. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic.
  • 26. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic.
  • 27. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Skewed NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship
  • 28. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Skewed Kurtotic NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship
  • 29. The distribution was more or less normal rather than skewed or kurtotic. Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Skewed Kurtotic Normal NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship
  • 30. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist.
  • 31. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. DV #1 Chemistry Test Scores
  • 32. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. DV #1 DV #2 Chemistry Test Scores Class Attendance
  • 33. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. DV #1 DV #2 DV #3 Chemistry Test Scores Class Attendance Homework Completed
  • 34. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Skewed Kurtotic Normal Double check your problem to see if that is the case NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship
  • 35. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship
  • 36. Only one Dependent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Inferential Descriptive Difference Relationship Difference Goodness of Fit Ratio/Interval Ordinal Nominal Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DV Double check your problem to see if that is the case
  • 37. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist.
  • 38. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. IV #1 Use of Innovative eBook
  • 39. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. IV #1 IV #2 Use of Innovative eBook Doing Homework to Classical Music
  • 40. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. IV #1 IV #2 IV #3 Use of Innovative eBook Doing Homework to Classical Music Gender
  • 41. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. IV #1 IV #2 IV #3 Use of Innovative eBook Doing Homework to Classical Music Gender
  • 42. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist.
  • 43. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DV Inferential NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship
  • 44. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Inferential Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DV 1 IV Inferential NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship
  • 45. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Nominal Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DV 1 IV 2+ IV Inferential NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship Difference
  • 46. Only one Independent Variable (DV) rather than two or more exist. Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DV 1 IV 2+ IV Double check your problem to see if that is the case Inferential NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship Difference
  • 47. There are three levels of the Independent Variable (IV) rather than just two levels. Note – even though repeated measures ANOVA can analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed using a paired sample t-test.
  • 48. There are three levels of the Independent Variable (DV) rather than just two levels. Note – even though repeated measures ANOVA can analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed using a paired sample t-test. Level 1 Before using the innovative ebook
  • 49. There are three levels of the Independent Variable (DV) rather than just two levels. Note – even though repeated measures ANOVA can analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed using a paired sample t-test. Level 1 Level 2 Before using the innovative ebook Using the innovative ebook for 2 months
  • 50. There are three levels of the Independent Variable (DV) rather than just two levels. Note – even though repeated measures ANOVA can analyze just two levels, this is generally analyzed using a paired sample t-test. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Before using the innovative ebook Using the innovative ebook for 2 months Using the innovative ebook for 4 months
  • 51. Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DVs 2+ IVs Inferential NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship 2 levels 3+ levels 1 IV Difference
  • 52. The samples are repeated rather than independent. Notice that the same class (Chem 100 section 003) is repeatedly tested.
  • 53. The samples are repeated rather than independent. Notice that the same class (Chem 100 section 003) is repeatedly tested. Chem 100 Section 003 January Chem 100 Section 003 March Chem 100 Section 003 May Before using the innovative ebook Using the innovative ebook for 2 months Using the innovative ebook for 4 months
  • 54. Descriptive Difference Goodness of Fit Skewed Kurtotic Normal 1 DV 2+ DVs 2+ IVs Inferential NominalOrdinalRatio/Interval Difference Relationship 2 levels 3+ levels 1 IV Difference RepeatedIndependent
  • 55. If this was the appropriate path for your problem then you have correctly selected Repeated-measures ANOVA to solve the problem you have been presented.
  • 57. Repeated Measures ANOVA – Another use of analysis of variance is to test whether a single group of people change over time.
  • 58. Repeated Measures ANOVA – Another use of analysis of variance is to test whether a single group of people change over time.
  • 59. In this case, the distributions that are compared to each other are not from different groups
  • 60. In this case, the distributions that are compared to each other are not from different groups versus Group 1 Group 2
  • 61. In this case, the distributions that are compared to each other are not from different groups versus Group 1 Group 2
  • 62. In this case, the distributions that are compared to each other are not from different groups But from different times. versus Group 1 Group 2
  • 63. In this case, the distributions that are compared to each other are not from different groups But from different times. versus Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 Group 1: Two Months Later versus
  • 64. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills.
  • 65. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills. January February April Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3
  • 66. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills. The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are differences somewhere among three time periods. January February April Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3
  • 67. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills. The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are differences somewhere among three time periods. January February April Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3
  • 68. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills. The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are differences somewhere among three time periods. January February April Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3 Average Score Average Score Average Score
  • 69. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills. The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are differences somewhere among three time periods. January February April Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3 Average Score Average Score Average Score
  • 70. For example, an instructor might administer the same test three times throughout the semester to ascertain whether students are improving in their skills. The overall F-ratio will reveal whether there are differences somewhere among three time periods. January February April Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3 Average Score Average Score Average Score There is a difference but we don’t know where
  • 71. Post hoc tests will reveal exactly where the differences occurred.
  • 72. Post hoc tests will reveal exactly where the differences occurred. January February April Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3 Average Score 35 Average Score 38 Average Score 40
  • 73. Post hoc tests will reveal exactly where the differences occurred. January February April Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3 Average Score 35 Average Score 38 Average Score 40 There is a statistically significant difference only between Exam 1 and Exam 3
  • 74. In contrast, with the One-way analysis of Variance (ANOVA) we were attempting to determine if there was a statistical difference between 2 or more (generally 3 or more) groups.
  • 75. In contrast, with the One-way analysis of Variance (ANOVA) we were attempting to determine if there was a statistical difference between 2 or more (generally 3 or more) groups. In our One-way ANOVA example in another presentation we attempted to determine if there was any statistically significant difference in the amount of Pizza Slices consumed by three different player types (football, basketball, and soccer).
  • 76. The data would be set up thus:
  • 77. The data would be set up thus: Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Basketball Players Pizza Slices Consumed Soccer Players Pizza Slices Consumed Ben 5 Cam 6 Dan 5 Bob 7 Colby 4 Denzel 8 Bud 8 Conner 8 Dilbert 8 Bubba 9 Custer 4 Don 1 Burt 10 Cyan 2 Dylan 2
  • 78. The data would be set up thus: Notice how the individuals in these groups are different (hence different names) Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Basketball Players Pizza Slices Consumed Soccer Players Pizza Slices Consumed Ben 5 Cam 6 Dan 5 Bob 7 Colby 4 Denzel 8 Bud 8 Conner 8 Dilbert 8 Bubba 9 Custer 4 Don 1 Burt 10 Cyan 2 Dylan 2
  • 79. The data would be set up thus: Notice how the individuals in these groups are different (hence different names) Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Basketball Players Pizza Slices Consumed Soccer Players Pizza Slices Consumed Ben 5 Cam 6 Dan 5 Bob 7 Colby 4 Denzel 8 Bud 8 Conner 8 Dilbert 8 Bubba 9 Custer 4 Don 1 Burt 10 Cyan 2 Dylan 2
  • 80. The data would be set up thus: Notice how the individuals in these groups are different (hence different names) A Repeated Measures ANOVA is different than a One-Way ANOVA in one simply way: Only one group of person or observations is being measured, but they are measured more than one time. Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Basketball Players Pizza Slices Consumed Soccer Players Pizza Slices Consumed Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5 Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1 Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2
  • 81. The data would be set up thus: Notice how the individuals in these groups are different (hence different names) A Repeated Measures ANOVA is different than a One-Way ANOVA in one simply way: Only one group of persons or observations is being measured, but they are measured more than one time. Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Basketball Players Pizza Slices Consumed Soccer Players Pizza Slices Consumed Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5 Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1 Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2
  • 82. Notice the different times football player pizza consumption is being measured. Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Pizza Slices Consumed Pizza Slices Consumed Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5 Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1 Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2
  • 83. Notice the different times football player pizza consumption is being measured. Football Players Pizza Slices Consumed Before the Season Pizza Slices Consumed During the Season Pizza Slices Consumed After the Season Ben 5 Ben 6 Ben 5 Bob 7 Bob 4 Bob 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bud 8 Bubba 9 Bubba 4 Bubba 1 Burt 10 Burt 2 Burt 2
  • 84. Since only one group is being measured 3 times, each time is dependent on the previous time. By dependent we mean there is a relationship.
  • 85. Since only one group is being measured 3 times, each time is dependent on the previous time. By dependent we mean there is a relationship. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 86. Since only one group is being measured 3 times, each time is dependent on the previous time. By dependent we mean there is a relationship. The relationship between the scores is that we are comparing the same person across multiple observations. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 87. So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and after-season scores have one important thing in common:
  • 88. So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and after-season scores have one important thing in common: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 89. So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and after-season scores have one important thing in common: THESE SCORES ALL BELONG TO BEN. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 90. So, Ben’s before-season and during-season and after-season scores have one important thing in common: THESE SCORES ALL BELONG TO BEN. They are subject to all the factors that are special to Ben when consuming pizza, including how much he likes or dislikes, the toppings that are available, the eating atmosphere, etc. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 91. What we want to find out is – how much the BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza consuming sessions differ.
  • 92. What we want to find out is – how much the BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza consuming sessions differ. But we have to find a way to eliminate the variability that is caused by individual differences that linger across all three eating sessions. Once again we are not interested in the things that make Ben, Ben while eating pizza (like he’s a picky eater). We are interested in the effect of where we are in the season (BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER on Pizza consumption.)
  • 93. What we want to find out is – how much the BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza consuming sessions differ. But we have to find a way to eliminate the variability that is caused by individual differences that linger across all three eating sessions. Once again we are not interested in the things that make Ben, Ben while eating pizza (like he’s a picky eater). We are interested in the effect of where we are in the season (BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER on Pizza consumption.)
  • 94. What we want to find out is – how much the BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER season pizza consuming sessions differ. But we have to find a way to eliminate the variability that is caused by individual differences that linger across all three eating sessions. Once again we are not interested in the things that make Ben, Ben while eating pizza (like he’s a picky eater). We are interested in the effect of where we are in the season (BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER on Pizza consumption.)
  • 95. That way we can focus just on the differences that are related to WHEN the pizza eating occurred.
  • 96. That way we can focus just on the differences that are related to WHEN the pizza eating occurred. After running a repeated-measures ANOVA, this is the output that we will get:
  • 97. That way we can focus just on the differences that are related to WHEN the pizza eating occurred. After running a repeated-measures ANOVA, this is the output that we will get: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 98. This output will help us determine if we reject the null hypothesis:
  • 99. This output will help us determine if we reject the null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the amount of pizza consumed by football players before, during, and/or after the season.
  • 100. This output will help us determine if we reject the null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the amount of pizza consumed by football players before, during, and/or after the season. Or accept the alternative hypothesis:
  • 101. This output will help us determine if we reject the null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the amount of pizza consumed by football players before, during, and/or after the season. Or accept the alternative hypothesis: There is a significant difference in the amount of pizza consumed by football players before, during, and/or after the season.
  • 102. To do so, let’s focus on the value .008
  • 103. To do so, let’s focus on the value .008 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 104. To do so, let’s focus on the value .008 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 105. To do so, let’s focus on the value .008 This means that if we were to reject the null hypothesis, the probability that we would be wrong is 8 times out of 1000. As you remember, if that were to happen, it would be called a Type 1 error. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 106. To do so, let’s focus on the value .008 This means that if we were to reject the null hypothesis, the probability that we would be wrong is 8 times out of 1000. As you remember, if that were to happen, it would be called a Type 1 error. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 107. But it is so unlikely, that we would be willing to take that risk and hence reject the null hypothesis.
  • 108. But it is so unlikely, that we would be willing to take that risk and hence we reject the null hypothesis. There IS NO statistically significant difference between the number of slices of pizza consumed by football players before, during, or after the football season.
  • 109. But it is so unlikely, that we would be willing to take that risk and hence we reject the null hypothesis. There IS NO statistically significant difference between the number of slices of pizza consumed by football players before, during, or after the football season.
  • 110. And accept the alternative hypothesis:
  • 111. And accept the alternative hypothesis: There IS A statistically significant difference between the number of slices of pizza consumed by football players before, during, or after the football season.
  • 112. And accept the alternative hypothesis: There IS A statistically significant difference between the number of slices of pizza consumed by football players before, during, or after the football season.
  • 113. Now we do not know which of the three are significantly different from one another or if all three are different. We just know that a difference exists.
  • 114. Now we do not know which of the three are significantly different from one another or if all three are different. We just know that a difference exists. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 115. Now we do not know which of the three are significantly different from one another or if all three are different. We just know that a difference exists. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 116. Now we do not know which of the three are significantly different from one another or if all three are different. We just know that a difference exists. Later, we can run what is called a “Post-hoc” test to determine where the difference lies. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 117. From this point on – we will delve into the actual calculations and formulas that produce a Repeated-measures ANOVA. If such detail is of interest or a necessity to know, please continue.
  • 118. How was a significance value of .008 calculated?
  • 119. How was a significance value of .008 calculated? Let’s begin with the calculation of the various sources of Sums of Squares
  • 120. How was a significance value of .008 calculated? Let’s begin with the calculation of the various sources of Sums of Squares Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 121. We do this so that we can explain what is causing the scores to vary or deviate.
  • 122. We do this so that we can explain what is causing the scores to vary or deviate. • Is it error?
  • 123. We do this so that we can explain what is causing the scores to vary or deviate. • Is it error? • Is it differences between times (before, during, and after)?
  • 124. We do this so that we can explain what is causing the scores to vary or deviate. • Is it error? • Is it differences between times (before, during, and after)? Remember, the full name for sum of squares is the sum of squared deviations about the mean. This will help us determine the amount of variation from each of the possible sources.
  • 125. Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of squares.
  • 126. Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of squares. 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2
  • 127. Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of squares. 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2
  • 128. Let’s begin by calculating the total sums of squares. 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2 This means one pizza eating observation for person “I” (e.g., Ben) on time “j” (e.g., before)
  • 130. For example: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 131. For example: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 132. For example: OR Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 133. For example: OR Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 134. For example: OR Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 135. For example: OR Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 136. For example: OR Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 137. For example: ETC Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 139. 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2 This means the average of all of the observations
  • 140. 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2 This means the average of all of the observations This means one pizza eating observation for person “I” (e.g., Ben) on time “j” (e.g., before)
  • 141. 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2 This means the average of all of the observations Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 This means one pizza eating observation for person “I” (e.g., Ben) on time “j” (e.g., before)
  • 142. 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2 This means the average of all of the observations Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Average of All Observations This means one pizza eating observation for person “I” (e.g., Ben) on time “j” (e.g., before)
  • 143. 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2 This means sum or add everything up
  • 144. 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2 This means sum or add everything up This means the average of all of the observations 𝑿𝑿
  • 145. 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑿)2 This means sum or add everything up This means the average of all of the observations This means one pizza eating observation for person “I” (e.g., Ben) on time “j” (e.g., before)
  • 146. Let’s calculate total sums of squares with this data set:
  • 147. Let’s calculate total sums of squares with this data set: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 148. To do so we will rearrange the data like so:
  • 149. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt
  • 150. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After
  • 151. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6
  • 152. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6
  • 153. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2
  • 154. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2 Each observation
  • 155. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Here is how we compute the Grand Mean = Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6
  • 156. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Here is how we compute the Grand Mean = Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6
  • 157. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Here is how we compute the Grand Mean = Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 158. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Here is how we compute the Grand Mean = Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Average of All Observations = 6.3
  • 159. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2 Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6 Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 - Bob Before 7 - Bud Before 8 - Bubba Before 9 - Burt Before 10 - Ben During 4 - Bob During 5 - Bud During 7 - Bubba During 8 - Burt During 7 - Ben After 4 - Bob After 5 - Bud After 6 - Bubba After 4 - Burt After 6 -
  • 160. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6 Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 - Bob Before 7 - Bud Before 8 - Bubba Before 9 - Burt Before 10 - Ben During 4 - Bob During 5 - Bud During 7 - Bubba During 8 - Burt During 7 - Ben After 4 - Bob After 5 - Bud After 6 - Bubba After 4 - Burt After 6 - 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2
  • 161. 𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = Σ(𝑋𝑖𝑗 − 𝑋)2 To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6 Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 - Bob Before 7 - Bud Before 8 - Bubba Before 9 - Burt Before 10 - Ben During 4 - Bob During 5 - Bud During 7 - Bubba During 8 - Burt During 7 - Ben After 4 - Bob After 5 - Bud After 6 - Bubba After 4 - Burt After 6 - Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Ben Before 5 - 6.3 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 Ben During 4 - 6.3 Bob During 5 - 6.3 Bud During 7 - 6.3 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 Burt During 7 - 6.3 Ben After 4 - 6.3 Bob After 5 - 6.3 Bud After 6 - 6.3 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 Burt After 6 - 6.3
  • 162. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6 Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 - Bob Before 7 - Bud Before 8 - Bubba Before 9 - Burt Before 10 - Ben During 4 - Bob During 5 - Bud During 7 - Bubba During 8 - Burt During 7 - Ben After 4 - Bob After 5 - Bud After 6 - Bubba After 4 - Burt After 6 - Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Ben Before 5 - 6.3 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 Ben During 4 - 6.3 Bob During 5 - 6.3 Bud During 7 - 6.3 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 Burt During 7 - 6.3 Ben After 4 - 6.3 Bob After 5 - 6.3 Bud After 6 - 6.3 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 Burt After 6 - 6.3 Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = Ben During 4 - 6.3 = Bob During 5 - 6.3 = Bud During 7 - 6.3 = Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = Burt During 7 - 6.3 = Ben After 4 - 6.3 = Bob After 5 - 6.3 = Bud After 6 - 6.3 = Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = Burt After 6 - 6.3 =
  • 163. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Ben Bob Bud Bubba Burt Football Players Season Ben Before Bob Before Bud Before Bubba Before Burt Before Ben During Bob During Bud During Bubba During Burt During Ben After Bob After Bud After Bubba After Burt After Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 Bob Before 7 Bud Before 8 Bubba Before 9 Burt Before 10 Ben During 4 Bob During 5 Bud During 7 Bubba During 8 Burt During 7 Ben After 4 Bob After 5 Bud After 6 Bubba After 4 Burt After 6 Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Ben Before 5 - Bob Before 7 - Bud Before 8 - Bubba Before 9 - Burt Before 10 - Ben During 4 - Bob During 5 - Bud During 7 - Bubba During 8 - Burt During 7 - Ben After 4 - Bob After 5 - Bud After 6 - Bubba After 4 - Burt After 6 - Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Ben Before 5 - 6.3 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 Ben During 4 - 6.3 Bob During 5 - 6.3 Bud During 7 - 6.3 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 Burt During 7 - 6.3 Ben After 4 - 6.3 Bob After 5 - 6.3 Bud After 6 - 6.3 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 Burt After 6 - 6.3 Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = Ben During 4 - 6.3 = Bob During 5 - 6.3 = Bud During 7 - 6.3 = Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = Burt During 7 - 6.3 = Ben After 4 - 6.3 = Bob After 5 - 6.3 = Bud After 6 - 6.3 = Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = Burt After 6 - 6.3 = Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3
  • 164. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1
  • 165. Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 To do so we will rearrange the data like so: We will subtract each of these values from the grand mean, square the result and sum them all up. Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 = 49.3
  • 166. Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Then – Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 = 49.3
  • 167. To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Then – we place the total sums of squares result in the ANOVA table. Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 = 49.3
  • 168. Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 To do so we will rearrange the data like so: Then – we place the total sums of squares result in the ANOVA table. Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 = 49.3
  • 169. Then – we place the total sums of squares result in the ANOVA table. Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 = 49.3
  • 170. Then – we place the total sums of squares result in the ANOVA table. Football Players Season Slices of Pizza Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben Before 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bob Before 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bud Before 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Bubba Before 9 - 6.3 = 2.7 7.1 Burt Before 10 - 6.3 = 3.7 13.4 Ben During 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob During 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Bubba During 8 - 6.3 = 1.7 2.8 Burt During 7 - 6.3 = 0.7 0.4 Ben After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Bob After 5 - 6.3 = -1.3 1.8 Bud After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 Bubba After 4 - 6.3 = -2.3 5.4 Burt After 6 - 6.3 = -0.3 0.1 = 49.3Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 171. We have now calculated the total sums of squares. This is a good starting point. Because now we want to know of that total sums of squares how many sums of squares are generated from the following sources:
  • 172. We have now calculated the total sums of squares. This is a good starting point. Because now we want to know of that total sums of squares how many sums of squares are generated from the following sources: • Between subjects (this is the variance we want to eliminate)
  • 173. We have now calculated the total sums of squares. This is a good starting point. Because now we want to know of that total sums of squares how many sums of squares are generated from the following sources: • Between subjects (this is the variance we want to eliminate) • Between Groups (this would be between BEFORE, DURING, AFTER)
  • 174. We have now calculated the total sums of squares. This is a good starting point. Because now we want to know of that total sums of squares how many sums of squares are generated from the following sources: • Between subjects (this is the variance we want to eliminate) • Between Groups (this would be between BEFORE, DURING, AFTER) • Error (the variance that we cannot explain with our design)
  • 175. With these sums of squares we will be able to compute our F ratio value and then statistical significance.
  • 176. With these sums of squares we will be able to compute our F ratio value and then statistical significance. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 177. With these sums of squares we will be able to compute our F ratio value and then statistical significance. Let’s calculate the sums of squares between subjects. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 178. Remember if we were just computing a one way ANOVA the table would go from this:
  • 179. Remember if we were just computing a one way ANOVA the table would go from this: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 180. Remember if we were just computing a one way ANOVA the table would go from this: To this: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 181. Remember if we were just computing a one way ANOVA the table would go from this: To this: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 2.669 .078 Error 29.600 8 3.700 Total 49.333 14
  • 182. Remember if we were just computing a one way ANOVA the table would go from this: To this: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 2.669 .078 Error 29.600 8 3.700 Total 49.333 14
  • 183. All of that variability goes into the error or within groups sums of squares (29.600) which makes the F statistic smaller (from 9.548 to 2.669), the significance value no longer significant (.008 to .078).
  • 184. All of that variability goes into the error or within groups sums of squares (29.600) which makes the F statistic smaller (from 9.548 to 2.669), the significance value no longer significant (.008 to .078). But the difference in within groups variability is not a function of error, it is a function of Ben, Bob, Bud, Bubba, and Burt’s being different in terms of the amount of slices they eat regardless of when they eat!
  • 185. All of that variability goes into the error or within groups sums of squares (29.600) which makes the F statistic smaller (from 9.548 to 2.669), the significance value no longer significant (.008 to .078). But the difference in within groups variability is not a function of error, it is a function of Ben, Bob, Bud, Bubba, and Burt’s being different in terms of the amount of slices they eat regardless of when they eat! Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 5 4 4 4.3 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 Burt 10 7 6 7.7
  • 186. Here is a data set where there are not between group differences, but there is a lot of difference based on when the group eats their pizza:
  • 187. Here is a data set where there are not between group differences, but there is a lot of difference based on when the group eats their pizza: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 1 5 9 5.0 Bob 2 5 8 5.0 Bud 3 5 7 5.0 Bubba 1 5 9 5.0 Burt 2 5 8 5.0
  • 188. Here is a data set where there are not between group differences, but there is a lot of difference based on when the group eats their pizza: There is no variability between subjects (they are all 5.0). Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 1 5 9 5.0 Bob 2 5 8 5.0 Bud 3 5 7 5.0 Bubba 1 5 9 5.0 Burt 2 5 8 5.0
  • 189. Look at the variability between groups:
  • 190. Look at the variability between groups: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 1 5 9 5.0 Bob 2 5 8 5.0 Bud 3 5 7 5.0 Bubba 1 5 9 5.0 Burt 2 5 8 5.0 1.8 5.0 8.2
  • 191. Look at the variability between groups: They are very different from one another. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 1 5 9 5.0 Bob 2 5 8 5.0 Bud 3 5 7 5.0 Bubba 1 5 9 5.0 Burt 2 5 8 5.0 1.8 5.0 8.2
  • 192. Here is what the ANOVA table would look like:
  • 193. Here is what the ANOVA table would look like: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 0.000 4 Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 Error 5.600 8 0.700 Total 49.333 14
  • 194. Here is what the ANOVA table would look like: Notice how there are no sum of squares values for the between subjects source of variability! Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 0.000 4 Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 Error 5.600 8 0.700 Total 49.333 14
  • 195. Here is what the ANOVA table would look like: Notice how there are no sum of squares values for the between subjects source of variability! But there is a lot of sum of squares values for the between groups. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 0.000 4 Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 Error 5.600 8 0.700 Total 49.333 14
  • 196. Here is what the ANOVA table would look like: Notice how there are no sum of squares values for the between subjects source of variability! But there is a lot of sum of squares values for the between groups. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 0.000 4 Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 Error 5.600 8 0.700 Total 49.333 14 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 0.000 4 Between Groups 102.400 2 51.200 73.143 .000 Error 5.600 8 0.700 Total 49.333 14
  • 197. What would the data set look like if there was very little between groups (by season) variability and a great deal of between subjects variability:
  • 198. What would the data set look like if there was very little between groups (by season) variability and a great deal of between subjects variability: Here it is:
  • 199. What would the data set look like if there was very little between groups (by season) variability and a great deal of between subjects variability: Here it is: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 3 3 3 3.0 Bob 5 5 5 5.0 Bud 7 7 7 7.0 Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 Burt 12 12 13 12.3 Between Subjects
  • 200. In this case the between subjects (Ben, Bob, Bud . . .), are very different.
  • 201. In this case the between subjects (Ben, Bob, Bud . . .), are very different. When you see between SUBJECTS averages that far away, you know that the sums of squares for between groups will be very large.
  • 202. In this case the between subjects (Ben, Bob, Bud . . .), are very different. When you see between SUBJECTS averages that far away, you know that the sums of squares for between groups will be very large. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 148.267 4 Between Groups 0.133 2 0.067 1.000 .689 Error 0.533 8 0.067 Total 148.933 14
  • 203. Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between group (seasons) average how close they are.
  • 204. Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between group (seasons) average how close they are. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 3 3 3 3.0 Bob 5 5 5 5.0 Bud 7 7 7 7.0 Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 Burt 12 12 13 12.3 7.0 7.0 7.2
  • 205. Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between group (seasons) average how close they are. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 3 3 3 3.0 Bob 5 5 5 5.0 Bud 7 7 7 7.0 Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 Burt 12 12 13 12.3 7.0 7.0 7.2 Between Groups
  • 206. Notice, in contrast, as we compute the between group (seasons) average how close they are. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 3 3 3 3.0 Bob 5 5 5 5.0 Bud 7 7 7 7.0 Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 Burt 12 12 13 12.3 7.0 7.0 7.2 Between Groups
  • 207. When you see between group averages this close you know that the sums of squares for between groups will be very small.
  • 208. When you see between group averages this close you know that the sums of squares for between groups will be very small. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 148.267 4 Between Groups 0.133 2 0.067 1.000 .689 Error 0.533 8 0.067 Total 148.933 14
  • 209. When you see between group averages this close you know that the sums of squares for between groups will be very small. Now that we have conceptually considered the sources of variability as described by the sum of squares, let’s begin calculating between subjects, between groups, and the error sources. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 148.267 4 Between Groups 0.133 2 0.067 1.000 .689 Error 0.533 8 0.067 Total 148.933 14
  • 210. We will begin with calculating Between Subjects sum of squares.
  • 211. We will begin with calculating Between Subjects sum of squares. To do so, let’s return to our original data set:
  • 212. We will begin with calculating Between Subjects sum of squares. To do so, let’s return to our original data set: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 213. We will begin with calculating Between Subjects sum of squares. To do so, let’s return to our original data set: Here is the formula for calculating SS between subjects. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 214. We will begin with calculating Between Subjects sum of squares. To do so, let’s return to our original data set: Here is the formula for calculating SS between subjects. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑋 𝑏𝑠 − 𝑋)2
  • 216. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 5 4 4 4.3 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 Burt 10 7 6 7.7
  • 217. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 5 4 4 4.3 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 This means the average of between subjects
  • 218. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2
  • 219. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 This means the average of all of the observations
  • 220. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again:
  • 221. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Average of All Observations = 6.3
  • 222. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean.
  • 223. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 This means the average of all of the observations
  • 224. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean.
  • 225. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean.Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4
  • 226. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Now we will square the deviations.
  • 227. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Now we will square the deviations.
  • 228. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Now we will square the deviations Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9
  • 229. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Now we will square the deviations. Then we sum all of these squared deviations.
  • 230. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Now we will square the deviations. Then we sum all of these squared deviations.
  • 231. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Now we will square the deviations. Then we sum all of these squared deviations. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Sum up
  • 232. Here is how we calculate the grand mean again: Now we subtract each subject or person average from the Grand Mean. This gives us the person’s average score deviation from the total or grand mean. Now we will square the deviations. Then we sum all of these squared deviations. Finally, we multiply the sum all of these squared deviations by the number of groups:
  • 233. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
  • 234. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 Number of conditions
  • 235. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
  • 236. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3
  • 237. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 1 2 3
  • 238. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 1 2 3
  • 239. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 1 2 3
  • 240. 𝑆𝑆 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 = 𝑘 ∗ Σ(𝑿 𝒃𝒔 − 𝑋)2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average minus Grand Mean Deviation Squared Ben 5 4 4 4.3 - 6.3 -2.0 3.9 Bob 7 5 5 5.7 - 6.3 -0.6 0.4 Bud 8 7 6 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Bubba 9 8 4 7.0 - 6.3 0.7 0.5 Burt 10 7 6 7.7 - 6.3 1.4 1.9 7.1 Times 3 groups Sum of Squares Between Subjects 21.3 1 2 3 Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza slices consumed Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 241. Now it is time to compute the between groups (seasons) sum of squares.
  • 242. Now it is time to compute the between groups’ (seasons) sum of squares. Here is the equation we will use to compute it:
  • 243. Now it is time to compute the between groups’ (seasons) sum of squares. Here is the equation we will use to compute it: 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
  • 244. Let’s break this down with our data set:
  • 245. Let’s break this down with our data set: 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
  • 246. Let’s break this down with our data set: 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 247. We begin by computing the mean of each condition (k) 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6
  • 248. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean We begin by computing the mean of each condition (k) 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
  • 249. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 We begin by computing the mean of each condition (k) 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
  • 250. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 We begin by computing the mean of each condition (k) 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2
  • 251. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 We begin by computing the mean of each condition (k) 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0
  • 252. Then subtract each condition mean from the grand mean. 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0
  • 253. Then subtract each condition mean from the grand mean. 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 minus - - -
  • 254. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 minus - - - Grand Mean 6.3 6.3 6.3 Then subtract each condition mean from the grand mean. 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
  • 255. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 minus - - - Grand Mean 6.3 6.3 6.3 equals Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3 Then subtract each condition mean from the grand mean. 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋)
  • 256. Square the deviation. 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) 𝟐 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 minus - - - Grand Mean 6.3 6.3 6.3 equals Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3 Squared Deviation 2.2 0.0 1.8
  • 257. Sum the Squared Deviations:
  • 258. Sum the Squared Deviations: 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) 𝟐
  • 259. Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 minus - - - Grand Mean 6.3 6.3 6.3 equals Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3 Squared Deviation 2.2 0.0 1.8 Sum Sum the Squared Deviations: 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) 𝟐
  • 260. Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 Condition Mean 7.8 6.2 5.0 minus - - - Grand Mean 6.3 6.3 6.3 equals Deviation 1.5 -0.1 -1.3 Squared Deviation 2.2 0.0 1.8 Sum Sum the Squared Deviations: 𝑛 ∗ Σ( 𝑋 𝑘 − 𝑋) 𝟐 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations
  • 261. Multiply by the number of observations per condition (number of pizza eating slices across before, during, and after).
  • 262. Multiply by the number of observations per condition (number of pizza eating slices across before, during, and after). 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations
  • 263. Multiply by the number of observations per condition (number of pizza eating slices across before, during, and after). 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations
  • 264. Multiply by the number of observations per condition (number of pizza eating slices across before, during, and after). 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations 5 Number of observations
  • 265. Multiply by the number of observations per condition (number of pizza eating slices across before, during, and after). 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations 5 Number of observations
  • 266. Multiply by the number of observations per condition (number of pizza eating slices across before, during, and after). 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations 5 Number of observations 19.7 Weighted Sum of Squared Deviations
  • 267. Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the weighted sum of squared deviations.
  • 268. Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the weighted sum of squared deviations. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 269. Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the weighted sum of squared deviations. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations 5 Number of observations 19.7 Weighted Sum of Squared Deviations
  • 270. Let’s return to the ANOVA table and put the weighted sum of squared deviations. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 3.95 Sum of Squared Deviations 5 Number of observations 19.7 Weighted Sum of Squared Deviations
  • 271. So far we have calculated Total Sum of Squares along with Sum of Squares for Between Subjects, and Between Groups.
  • 272. So far we have calculated Total Sum of Squares along with Sum of Squares along with Sum of Squares for Between Subjects, Between Groups. Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 273. Now we will calculate the sum of squares associated with Error.
  • 274. Now we will calculate the sum of squares associated with Error. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 275. To do this we simply add the between subjects and between groups sums of squares.
  • 276. To do this we simply add the between subjects and between groups sums of squares. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 277. To do this we simply add the between subjects and between groups sums of squares. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 21.333 Between Subjects Sum of Squares 19.733 Between Groups Sum of Squares 41.600 Between Subjects & Groups Sum of Squares Combined
  • 278. Then we subtract the Between Subjects & Group Sum of Squares Combined (41.600) from the Total Sum of Squares (49.333)
  • 279. Then we subtract the Between Subjects & Group Sum of Squares Combined (41.600) from the Total Sum of Squares (49.333) 49.333 Total Sum of Squares 41.600 Between Subjects & Groups Sum of Squares Combined 8.267 Sum of Squares Attributed to Error or Unexplained
  • 280. Then we subtract the Between Subjects & Group Sum of Squares Combined (41.600) from the Total Sum of Squares (49.333) 49.333 Total Sum of Squares 41.600 Between Subjects & Groups Sum of Squares Combined 8.267 Sum of Squares Attributed to Error or Unexplained Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 281. Now we have all of the information necessary to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between pizza slices consumed by football players between three different eating occasions (before, during or after the season).
  • 282. Now we have all of the information necessary to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between pizza slices consumed by football players between three different eating occasions (before, during or after the season). Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 283. To calculate the significance level
  • 284. To calculate the significance level Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 285. We must calculate the F ratio
  • 286. We must calculate the F ratio Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 287. Which is calculated by dividing the Between Groups Mean Square value (9.867) by the Error Mean Square value (1.033).
  • 288. Which is calculated by dividing the Between Groups Mean Square value (9.867) by the Error Mean Square value (1.033). Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 =
  • 289. Which is calculated by dividing the sum of squares between groups by its degrees of freedom, as shown below:
  • 290. Which is calculated by dividing the sum of squares between groups by its degrees of freedom, as shown below: Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 =
  • 291. Which is calculated by dividing the sum of squares between groups by its degrees of freedom, as shown below: And Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 =
  • 292. Which is calculated by dividing the sum of squares between groups by its degrees of freedom, as shown below: And Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 = =
  • 293. Which is calculated by dividing the sum of squares between groups by its degrees of freedom, as shown below: And Now we need to figure out how we calculate degrees of freedom for each source of sums of squares. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 = =
  • 294. Let’s begin with determining the degrees of freedom Between Subjects.
  • 295. Let’s begin with determining the degrees of freedom Between Subjects.
  • 296. Let’s begin with determining the degrees of freedom Between Subjects. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 297. Let’s begin with determining the degrees of freedom Between Subjects. We take the number of subjects which, in this case, is 5 – 1 = 4 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 298. Let’s begin with determining the degrees of freedom Between Subjects. We take the number of subjects which, in this case, is 5 – 1 = 4 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 299. Let’s begin with determining the degrees of freedom Between Subjects. We take the number of subjects which, in this case, is 5 – 1 = 4 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Average Ben 3 3 3 3.0 Bob 5 5 5 5.0 Bud 7 7 7 7.0 Bubba 8 8 8 8.0 Burt 12 12 13 12.3 Between Subjects 1 2 3 4 5
  • 300. Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of Freedom (df)
  • 301. Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of Freedom (df) Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 302. Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of Freedom (df) We take the number of groups which in this case is 3 – 1 = 2 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 303. Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of Freedom (df) We take the number of groups which in this case is 3 – 1 = 2 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 304. Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of Freedom (df) We take the number of groups which in this case is 3 – 1 = 2 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 1 2 3
  • 305. Now – onto Between Groups Degrees of Freedom (df) We take the number of groups which in this case is 3 – 1 = 2 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Pizza Slices Consumed Football Players Before the Season During the Season After the Season Ben 5 4 4 Bob 7 5 5 Bud 8 7 6 Bubba 9 8 4 Burt 10 7 6 1 2 3
  • 306. The error degrees of freedom are calculated by multiplying the between subjects by the between groups degrees of freedom.
  • 307. The error degrees of freedom are calculated by multiplying the between subjects by the between groups degrees of freedom. 4 Between Subjects Degrees of Freedom 2 Between Groups Degrees of Freedom 8 Error Degrees of Freedom
  • 308. The error degrees of freedom are calculated by multiplying the between subjects by the between groups degrees of freedom. 4 Between Subjects Degrees of Freedom 2 Between Groups Degrees of Freedom 8 Error Degrees of Freedom Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 309. The error degrees of freedom are calculated by multiplying the between subjects by the between groups degrees of freedom. 4 Between Subjects Degrees of Freedom 2 Between Groups Degrees of Freedom 8 Error Degrees of Freedom Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 310. The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares is calculated by adding all of the degrees of freedom from the other three sources.
  • 311. The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares is calculated by adding all of the degrees of freedom from the other three sources. 4 2 8 14
  • 312. The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares is calculated by adding all of the degrees of freedom from the other three sources. 4 2 8 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 313. The degrees of freedom for total sum of squares is calculated by adding all of the degrees of freedom from the other three sources. 4 2 8 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 314. We will compute the Mean Square values for just the Between Groups and Error. We are not interested in what is happening with Between Subjects. We calculated the Between Subjects sum of squares only take out any differences that are a function of differences that would exist regardless of what group we were looking at.
  • 315. Once again, if we had not pulled out Between Subjects sums of squares, then the Between Subjects would be absorbed in the error value:
  • 316. Once again, if we had not pulled out Between Subjects sums of squares, then the Between Subjects would be absorbed in the error value: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 317. Once again, if we had not pulled out Between Subjects sums of squares, then the Between Subjects would be absorbed in the error value: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Within Groups 29.600 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 318. Once again, if we had not pulled out Between Subjects sums of squares, then the Between Subjects would be absorbed in the error value: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Within Groups 29.600 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 319. Once again, if we had not pulled out Between Subjects sums of squares, then the Between Subjects would be absorbed in the error value: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Within Groups 29.600 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Within Groups is another way of saying Error
  • 320. And that would have created a larger error mean square value:
  • 321. And that would have created a larger error mean square value: Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Error 29.600 12 2.467 Total 49.333 14
  • 322. And that would have created a larger error mean square value: Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Error 29.600 12 2.467 Total 49.333 14
  • 323. Which in turn would have created a smaller F value:
  • 324. Which in turn would have created a smaller F value: Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Error 29.600 12 2.467 Total 49.333 14
  • 325. Which in turn would have created a smaller F value: Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Error 29.600 12 2.467 Total 49.333 14 = =
  • 326. Which in turn would have created a larger significance value:
  • 327. Which in turn would have created a larger significance value: Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Error 29.600 12 2.467 Total 49.333 14
  • 328. Which in turn would have created a larger significance value: Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Measure: Pizza_slices Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 4.000 .047 Error 29.600 12 2.467 Total 49.333 14 = =
  • 329. With a larger significance value it makes it less likely to reject the null hypothesis.
  • 330. With a larger significance value it makes it less likely to reject the null hypothesis. It is for that reason that we calculate the Between Subjects sums of squares and pull it out of the error sums of squares to get an uncontaminated error value…
  • 331. With a larger significance value it makes it less likely to reject the null hypothesis. It is for that reason that we calculate the Between Subjects sums of squares and pull it out of the error sums of squares to get an uncontaminated error value… Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 332. With a larger significance value it makes it less likely to reject the null hypothesis. It is for that reason that we calculate the Between Subjects sums of squares and pull it out of the error sums of squares to get an uncontaminated error value… Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 333. With a larger significance value it makes it less likely to reject the null hypothesis. It is for that reason that we calculate the Between Subjects sums of squares and pull it out of the error sums of squares to get an uncontaminated error value… And a more accurate F value… Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 334. With a larger significance value it makes it less likely to reject the null hypothesis. It is for that reason that we calculate the Between Subjects sums of squares and pull it out of the error sums of squares to get an uncontaminated error value… And a more accurate F value… Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 335. …as well as a more accurate Significance value…
  • 336. …as well as a more accurate Significance value… Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 337. …as well as a more accurate Significance value… Therefore, we will only focus on mean square values for Between Groups and Error: Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 338. …as well as a more accurate Significance value… Therefore, we will only focus on mean square values for Between Groups and Error: Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 339. As previously demonstrated, let’s continue with our calculations by dividing the Between Groups mean square value (9.867) by the Error mean square value (1.033).
  • 340. As previously demonstrated, let’s continue with our calculations by dividing the Between Groups mean square value (9.867) by the Error mean square value (1.033). Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 341. As previously demonstrated, let’s continue with our calculations by dividing the Between Groups mean square value (9.867) by the Error mean square value (1.033). Which gives us an F value of 9.548 Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 =
  • 342. Because we are using statistical software we will also get a significance value of .008. This means that is we were to theoretically run this experiment 1000 times we would be wrong to reject the null hypothesis 8 times this incurring a type 1 error.
  • 343. Because we are using statistical software we will also get a significance value of .008. This means that is we were to theoretically run this experiment 1000 times we would be wrong to reject the null hypothesis 8 times this incurring a type 1 error. If we are willing to live with those odds of failure (8 out of 1000) then we would reject the null hypothesis.
  • 344. If we had set our alpha cut off at .05 that would mean we would be willing to take the risk of being wrong 50 out of 1000 or 5 out of 100 times.
  • 345. If we had set our alpha cut off at .05 that would mean we would be willing to take the risk of being wrong 50 out of 1000 or 5 out of 100 times. If we do not get a significance value (.008) then we could go to the F table to determine if our F value of 9.548 exceeds the F critical value in the F table.
  • 346. This F critical value is located using the degrees of freedom for error (8) and the degrees of freedom for between groups (2).
  • 347. This F critical value is located using the degrees of freedom for error (8) and the degrees of freedom for between groups (2). Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 348. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Error df
  • 349. This F critical value is located using the degrees of freedom for error (8) and the degrees of freedom for between groups (2).
  • 350. This F critical value is located using the degrees of freedom for error (8) and the degrees of freedom for between groups (2). Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 351. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 BG df
  • 352. Now let’s put them together:
  • 353. Now let’s put them together: Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 354. Now let’s put them together: Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 BG df Error df
  • 355. Now let’s put them together: Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 BG df Error df
  • 356. Now let’s put them together: Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 BG df Error df
  • 357. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14 Now let’s put them together:
  • 358. Now let’s put them together: Since 9.548 exceeds 4.46 at the .05 alpha level, we will reject the null hypothesis. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 359. Now let’s put them together: Since 9.548 exceeds 4.46 at the .05 alpha level, we will reject the null hypothesis. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 360. Now let’s put them together: Since 9.548 exceeds 4.46 at the .05 alpha level, we will reject the null hypothesis. Once again, we only show you the table as another way to determine if you have statistical significance. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14
  • 361. Now let’s put them together: Since 9.548 exceeds 4.46 at the .05 alpha level, we will reject the null hypothesis. Once again, we only show you the table as another way to determine if you have statistical significance. That’s it. You have now seen the inner workings of Repeated Measures ANOVA. Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Subjects 21.333 4 Between Groups 19.733 2 9.867 9.548 .008 Error 8.267 8 1.033 Total 49.333 14

Editor's Notes