![REFERENCES
[1] D. Vamshee Krishna, B. Jagadish Chakravarthy, “RCC underpass design, Modeling and Analysis
using Parametric Study of Soil Structure Interactions”, International Journal of Advance Research, Vol. 3, Issue 8,
August 2015, ISSN:2320-9100 (Online).
[2] Ubaid Illahi, Burhan-ul-Wafa, Danish Zaffar Wani, Raqeeb Nabi Khan, “Traffic Flow Analysis &
Efficiency of Geometric Design T-Intersection-a case study”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and
Technology, Vol. 7, Issue-1, Jan-Feb 2016, ISSN: 0976-6308(Print), 0976-6316 (Online).
[3] Fani Antoniou, Dimitrios Konstantinidis, Georgios Aretoulis, Yiannis Xenidis, “Preliminary
Construction Cost Estimates for Motorway Underpass Bridges”, International Journal of Construction
Management, ISSN: 1562-3599 (Print), ISSN: 2331-2327 (Online).
[4] Mohankar R.H., Ronghe G.N., “Analysis and Design of Underpass RCC Bridge”, International
Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, Vol. 1, Issue-3, 2010, ISSN: 0976-4399.
[5] Vinayak Demane and Prof. Swapnil Cholekar, “Soil Structure Interaction of Underpass RCC Bridge”,
International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, Vol. 1, Issue 4, 2013, ISSN: 2321-3418.
[6] Mohankar R.H., Pidurkar M.D., Pathan Mohd. G., “Parametric Study of Underpass Bridge”,
International Journal of Emerging Research in Management & Technology, Vol. 4, Issue-4, April 2015, ISSN:
2278-9359.
[7] Sheik Azhar U Rehman, A. K. Duggal, “Suitability of Different Materials Used for Road Marking: A
Review”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 2, Issue 2, May 2015, ISSN: 2495-
0056 (Online), ISSN: 2395-0072 (Print).
[8] B.N.Sinha, R.P.Sharma., RCC BOX CULVERT - METHODOLOGY AND
DESIGNS INCLUDING COMPUTER METHOD, Journal of Indian Roads Congress, October-December 2009
6/27/2018
31](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/proposalofunderpassatkatapadyjunction-1-180627060428/85/UNDERPASS-DESIGN-31-320.jpg)
![[9] Dr. B.C. Punmia, Er. Ashok K. Jain, Dr. Arun K. Jain, “Soil Mechanics and Foundations”, Laxmi
Publications (P) Ltd, 16th Edition, 2005.
[10] IRC 54-1974, “Lateral and vertical clearances at underpasses for vehicular traffic”, Published by
The Indian Road Congress.
[11] IS 2720, Part 3-2, 1980, “Methods of Test for Soils -Determination of Specific Gravity of Fine,
Medium & Coarse Grained Soil”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[12] IS 2720, Part 29, 1975, “Methods of Test for Soils - Determination of Dry Density of Soils In-
Place by the Core-Cutter Method”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[13] IS 2720, Part 5, 1985, “Methods of Test for Soils – Determination of Liquid Limit and Plastic
Limit”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[14] IS 2720, Part 6, 1972, “Methods of Test for Soils – Determination of Shrinkage Factors”, Bureau
of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[15] IS 2720, Part 7, 1980, “Methods of Test for Soils - Determination of Water Content and Dry
Density Relation using Light Compaction”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[16] IS 2720, Part 12, 1981, “Methods of Test for Soils – Determination of Soil from Consolidated
Undrained Triaxial Compression Test with Measurement of Pore Water Pressure”, Bureau of Indian Standards,
New Delhi.
[17] IS 2720, Part 16, 1987, “Methods of Test for Soils – Laboratory Determination of CBR”, Bureau
of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
6/27/2018
32REFERENCES](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/proposalofunderpassatkatapadyjunction-1-180627060428/85/UNDERPASS-DESIGN-32-320.jpg)
UNDERPASS DESIGN
- 2. CONTENTS • Introduction • Objective • Methodology • Survey results • Design of road and over bridge and analysis • Estimation • Conclusion • Reference 6/27/2018 2
- 3. 6/27/2018 3
- 4. OBJECTIVES • To reduce accidents • Hassle free movement of vehicles • Safety for pedestrians • Providing space for parking of vehicles • Maintain design speed in highway • Complete utility of service roads 4 6/27/2018
- 6. SURVEY RESULTS EXISISTING PLAN OF KATPADY JUNCTION 6/27/2018 6
- 7. SURVEY RESULTS 6/27/2018 7 TOWARDS UDUPI TOWARDS MANGALORE KATPADY JUNCTION
- 9. TRAFFIC COUNT • In order to felicitate the assessment of present and future traffic demands for the development of roads traffic count is most essential. • Traffic count gives the PCU values which is used for design purposes. • The traffic count for the project was carried on the basis of IRC 9-1972 and IRC SP 19-2001. • The traffic count for the project was done from 26-2-2018 ,7am to 27-2-2018 ,7am. 6/27/2018 9
- 10. 6/27/2018 10
- 13. SOIL TEST • Specific gravity • Density of soil • Consistency limit • Optimum moisture content • Triaxial compression test • California bearing ratio 6/27/2018 13
- 14. PROPERTIES OF SOIL Specific Gravity 2.3 Dry density 1.7 g/cc Liquid limit 26% Plastic limit 24.2% Shrinkage limit 19.74% Optimum moisture content 17.438% Maximum dry density 1.748 g/cc Average cohesion value 0.3 Angle of internal friction 29˚37” Safe bearing capacity 193.4 KN/m2 CBR 5.79% 6/27/2018 14
- 15. DESIGN OF ROAD • Using IRC:37-2001 pavement is designed. • According to design • Bituminous Concrete -40mm • Dense Bituminous Macadam- 105mm • Granular Sub base course-250mm • Granular Base course – 260mm • Total Thickness of pavement is 655mm 6/27/2018 15
- 16. DESIGN OF BOX CULVERT • Load calculation I. Top Slab Grade of Concrete = 30MPA dead load = 1.43kN/m2 Grade of Steel = Fe500 live load = 18.23 kN/m2 II. Bottom Slab dead load = 30.83 kN/m2 Live Load = 51.83 kN/m2 6/27/2018 16
- 17. ANALYSIS • Analysis is done from STAAD PRO Software • Moments Top slab = 309.854 kN/m2 Bottom slab = 309.854 kN/m2 Side walls = 228 kN/m2 6/27/2018 17
- 21. REINFORCEMENT CALCULATION Top slab and bottom slab: • Provide 16mm @190mm c-c (main bars) in top portion • Provide 16mm @230mm c-c (main bars) in bottom portion • Provide 8mm @ 50mm c-c (distribution bars) Side walls • Provide 16mm @230mm c-c (main bars) • Provide 8mm @ 50mm c-c (distribution bars) 6/27/2018 21
- 22. Estimation 6/27/2018Dept. Of Civil Engineering 22
- 23. Estimation 6/27/2018Dept. Of Civil Engineering 23
- 26. 6/27/2018 26
- 27. DIMENSIONS OF PROPOSED PLAN 6/27/2018 27 Mattu Direction Mangalore Direction Udupi Direction Belman Direction
- 28. DIMENSIONS OF BOX CULVERT 6/27/2018 28
- 30. CONCLUSION If our project is implemented, • Speed of vehicles is maintained • Risk free connections in between state highway and national highway • Simplified movement of intercity traffic • Safety of pedestrians in crossing • Parking problems can be reduced • Accident reduction in junction 6/27/2018 30
- 31. REFERENCES [1] D. Vamshee Krishna, B. Jagadish Chakravarthy, “RCC underpass design, Modeling and Analysis using Parametric Study of Soil Structure Interactions”, International Journal of Advance Research, Vol. 3, Issue 8, August 2015, ISSN:2320-9100 (Online). [2] Ubaid Illahi, Burhan-ul-Wafa, Danish Zaffar Wani, Raqeeb Nabi Khan, “Traffic Flow Analysis & Efficiency of Geometric Design T-Intersection-a case study”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Vol. 7, Issue-1, Jan-Feb 2016, ISSN: 0976-6308(Print), 0976-6316 (Online). [3] Fani Antoniou, Dimitrios Konstantinidis, Georgios Aretoulis, Yiannis Xenidis, “Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates for Motorway Underpass Bridges”, International Journal of Construction Management, ISSN: 1562-3599 (Print), ISSN: 2331-2327 (Online). [4] Mohankar R.H., Ronghe G.N., “Analysis and Design of Underpass RCC Bridge”, International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, Vol. 1, Issue-3, 2010, ISSN: 0976-4399. [5] Vinayak Demane and Prof. Swapnil Cholekar, “Soil Structure Interaction of Underpass RCC Bridge”, International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, Vol. 1, Issue 4, 2013, ISSN: 2321-3418. [6] Mohankar R.H., Pidurkar M.D., Pathan Mohd. G., “Parametric Study of Underpass Bridge”, International Journal of Emerging Research in Management & Technology, Vol. 4, Issue-4, April 2015, ISSN: 2278-9359. [7] Sheik Azhar U Rehman, A. K. Duggal, “Suitability of Different Materials Used for Road Marking: A Review”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 2, Issue 2, May 2015, ISSN: 2495- 0056 (Online), ISSN: 2395-0072 (Print). [8] B.N.Sinha, R.P.Sharma., RCC BOX CULVERT - METHODOLOGY AND DESIGNS INCLUDING COMPUTER METHOD, Journal of Indian Roads Congress, October-December 2009 6/27/2018 31
- 32. [9] Dr. B.C. Punmia, Er. Ashok K. Jain, Dr. Arun K. Jain, “Soil Mechanics and Foundations”, Laxmi Publications (P) Ltd, 16th Edition, 2005. [10] IRC 54-1974, “Lateral and vertical clearances at underpasses for vehicular traffic”, Published by The Indian Road Congress. [11] IS 2720, Part 3-2, 1980, “Methods of Test for Soils -Determination of Specific Gravity of Fine, Medium & Coarse Grained Soil”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [12] IS 2720, Part 29, 1975, “Methods of Test for Soils - Determination of Dry Density of Soils In- Place by the Core-Cutter Method”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [13] IS 2720, Part 5, 1985, “Methods of Test for Soils – Determination of Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [14] IS 2720, Part 6, 1972, “Methods of Test for Soils – Determination of Shrinkage Factors”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [15] IS 2720, Part 7, 1980, “Methods of Test for Soils - Determination of Water Content and Dry Density Relation using Light Compaction”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [16] IS 2720, Part 12, 1981, “Methods of Test for Soils – Determination of Soil from Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test with Measurement of Pore Water Pressure”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [17] IS 2720, Part 16, 1987, “Methods of Test for Soils – Laboratory Determination of CBR”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. 6/27/2018 32REFERENCES