SlideShare a Scribd company logo
State of the Art Seminar
Presentation on
IOT-WUSN(Wireless Underground Sensor networks )
Presented by Yohannes Bishaw
EmailJohn.fhy@gmail.com
Contents Covered
Introduction
Types of WUSN
Current technology for WUSN
WUSN design challenges
Conclusion
Application of WUSN
Communication Architecture WUSN
Introduction
The Internet of things (IoT) is the inter-networking of physical
devices, vehicles (also referred to as "connected devices" and "smart
devices"), buildings, and other items—embedded with electronics,
software, sensors, actuators, and network connectivity that enable
these objects to collect and exchange data.
Introduction…
In WUSN the node is completely underground.
 WUSN consist of wireless devices that operate below the ground
surface. These devices are buried completely under dense soil. The
main difference between WUSN and the terrestrial wireless sensor
network is the communication medium.
 Wireless Underground Sensor Networks (WUSN) have the potential to
impact a wide variety of new applications including intelligent
irrigation, soil information monitoring, etc, the internet of tings for
water-saving agriculture.
Types of WSN
Terrestrial WSN  Distributed in given area either in ad-hoc manner
Under Ground WSN Sensors buried underground , agriculture or
in cave or mines that monitors underground conditions.
Under Water WSN  Sensors are located under water.
Multimedia WSN  sensors are equipped with cameras and
microphones.
Types of WSN
Application of wireless underground sensor
network
Environmental monitoring of the water-saving agriculture
Safety detection of mine
Quality monitoring of underground facilities
Navigation of ground vehicle
Intelligent mines
Current technology for underground sensing
The current system consists of a buried sensor and a data logger on the
surface
Very useful for a variety of applications
Suffer from several shortcomings when compared to wireless
underground sensor networks
Concealment
Ease of deployment
Timeliness of data
Reliability
Coverage density
Concealment
In current systems the data loggers are deployed on surface
Communication is easier as no underground communication is
involved
Above ground equipment is vulnerable to agricultural and landscaping
equipment or unacceptable for aesthetic reasons
In WUSN the equipment is underground secure from any theft and
protected from damage
Ease of deployment
Current technology uses wired system
Tough to add new sensors or data loggers
No scalability issues with WUSN as its fully wireless
Timeliness of data
Due to wireless nature the data from sensors is forwarded in real
time to sink
In data loggers the data may be stored for later retrieval
Reliability
Current systems are fully dependent on data loggers
Data logger failure means whole network failure
WUSN eliminate the need of data logger
Each sensor can forward sensor readings independently
WUSN’s are self healing
Coverage density
Current systems require the sensor to be deployed close to the data
logger.
It results in less coverage.
WUSN eliminate the need of data logger.
Sensors can be deployed anywhere , hence increasing the coverage area.
WUSN design challenges
Power Conservation
Topology design
Antenna design
Environmental extremes
Power conservation
Underground sensor nodes require more power as attenuation is more
Difficult to recharge or replace batteries
Solar or any alternate energy form also can’t be used
Power conservation is the key
Should be implemented by using power efficient hardware and
communication protocols
Topology design
Considerations
Application-The density of sensor deployment is dictated by the
application. Security application require dense whereas soil monitoring
less dense deployment.
Power usage minimization-Power usage can be minimized by designing
a topology with a large number of short-distance hops rather than a
smaller number of long-distance hops.
Cost-Deeper and Denser deployments result in more costs. Establish
trade offs.
Underground topology
All sensor devices underground
Sink may be underground or above it
Can be single depth or multi depth
Provides maximum concealment of network
Ground air ground path can be used
Hybrid topology
Mixture of underground and aboveground sensor devices
Power intensive underground hops can be traded for less expensive
hops in a terrestrial network.
Terrestrial devices can be easily recharger or replaced
Network is not fully concealed
Antenna design
Issues to be considered
Variable requirements-Devices near the surface air interface have
different requirements from those deeper inside as they suffer from
reflection.
Size-Lower frequencies require larger antennas, this is a challenge as
sensor device size should be small.
Directionality-The antennas should be oriented for both horizontal
and vertical communication.
Environmental extremes
Underground environment is not ideal for electronic devices
Protection from water, animals, insects etc. is needed.
Devices should be resistant to pressure of people or objects moving
overhead
Communication architecture of sensor networks
Physical layer
Lower frequencies are ideal for WUSN
They face less attenuation but the antenna size becomes large
Lower frequencies result in lesser bandwidth
Due to this the data rate in WUSN is very less
Data link layer
In WUSN the focus should be on less retransmissions
Traditional link layer protocols are contention based or TDMA
based
Collision avoidance using CTS/RTS involves too much overhead
In TDMA based scheme the synchronization may be lost between
nodes
Network layer
Ad hoc routing protocols may be proactive, reactive or geographical
Both proactive and reactive are not applicable to WUSN due to
signaling overhead and synchronization issues
Geographical routing can be helpful for WUSN only in some cases
Routing protocols should be dynamic as link costs change due to
soil conditions, water etc.
Transport layer
Performs function of flow control and congestion control
Congestion control can be done by routing data to terrestrial relays
which are capable of a higher data rate
Window based mechanism for flow control may not be applicable to
WUSN as retransmissions are more
In WUSN retransmission should be less to save energy
Conclusion
We introduced the concept of WUSNs in which sensor devices are
deployed completely below ground. There e are existing applications of
underground sensing, such as soil monitoring for agriculture.
Sensor Networks are emerging as a great aid in improving agricultural
productivity, quality and resource optimization.
Very application dependent and close interaction between agriculture
scientist and ICT researchers will help.
Several challenges like underground wireless channel, less bandwidth,
power conservation etc.
Wireless underground Sensor Network based on IOT water saved agriculture

More Related Content

PPTX
Underwater Sensor wireless Network
PDF
UNDERWATER SENSORS NETWORKS
PPTX
Underwater acoustic sensor network
PPTX
Securing Underwater Wireless Communication
PPTX
Wireless sensor network applications
PDF
Wireless sensor networks for disaster managment
PPTX
Wireless sensor networks
PPTX
Wireless Sensor Networks
Underwater Sensor wireless Network
UNDERWATER SENSORS NETWORKS
Underwater acoustic sensor network
Securing Underwater Wireless Communication
Wireless sensor network applications
Wireless sensor networks for disaster managment
Wireless sensor networks
Wireless Sensor Networks

What's hot (20)

PDF
Unit 2 session1
DOC
wireless sensor network ieee
PDF
Investigation of energy efficient protocols based on stable clustering for en...
PPTX
Environmental wireless sensors networks
PPT
Applications of WSN
PPTX
Wireless sensor networks
PPTX
Wireless Sensor Networks
PPTX
Wireless sensor networks
PPTX
wsn networks
PPT
Wireless sensor network and its application
PPT
Wireless sensor network
PPTX
Wireless sensor networks
PDF
Wireless sensor network applications environment monitoring
PPTX
introduction to wireless sensor network
PPT
Wireless Sensor Networking
PPTX
wireless sensor network ppt
PPTX
Wsn unit-1-ppt
DOCX
wireless sensor network
PPTX
Infrastructure Establishment
PPT
Elec6076 wireless sensor networks
Unit 2 session1
wireless sensor network ieee
Investigation of energy efficient protocols based on stable clustering for en...
Environmental wireless sensors networks
Applications of WSN
Wireless sensor networks
Wireless Sensor Networks
Wireless sensor networks
wsn networks
Wireless sensor network and its application
Wireless sensor network
Wireless sensor networks
Wireless sensor network applications environment monitoring
introduction to wireless sensor network
Wireless Sensor Networking
wireless sensor network ppt
Wsn unit-1-ppt
wireless sensor network
Infrastructure Establishment
Elec6076 wireless sensor networks
Ad

Similar to Wireless underground Sensor Network based on IOT water saved agriculture (20)

PPTX
Wireless underground sensor networks
PDF
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
PPT
Wireless sensor network
PDF
IRJET- A Comprehensive Study in Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) using Artif...
PPTX
SINGLE HOP AND MULTI HOP WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK
PDF
PDF
Energetic Slot Allotment for Improving Interchange in Wireless Sensor Network
PDF
Analysis of CODBR and CEEDBR Protocols in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks
PDF
Analysis of CoDBR and CEEDBR protocols in underwater wireless sensor networks
PPTX
“Securing underwater wireless communication networks” 2
PPTX
WSN_Chapter _1.pptx
PPTX
SINGLE NODE ARCHITECTURE Hardware components of a sensor node.pptx
PPTX
Underwater sensor network
PPTX
Wireless-Sensor-Networks-WSNs-Architecture-and-Applications
PPTX
Wireless-Sensor-Networks-WSNs-Architecture-and-Applications.pptx
PPTX
Wireless-Sensor-Networks-WSNs-Architecture-and-Applications.pptx
PDF
Quality of Service Optimization in Realm of Green Monitoring using Broad Area...
PDF
A Review On Reactive And Proactive Wireless Sensor Networks Protocols
PDF
Oj3425062509
Wireless underground sensor networks
Welcome to International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
Wireless sensor network
IRJET- A Comprehensive Study in Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) using Artif...
SINGLE HOP AND MULTI HOP WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK
Energetic Slot Allotment for Improving Interchange in Wireless Sensor Network
Analysis of CODBR and CEEDBR Protocols in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks
Analysis of CoDBR and CEEDBR protocols in underwater wireless sensor networks
“Securing underwater wireless communication networks” 2
WSN_Chapter _1.pptx
SINGLE NODE ARCHITECTURE Hardware components of a sensor node.pptx
Underwater sensor network
Wireless-Sensor-Networks-WSNs-Architecture-and-Applications
Wireless-Sensor-Networks-WSNs-Architecture-and-Applications.pptx
Wireless-Sensor-Networks-WSNs-Architecture-and-Applications.pptx
Quality of Service Optimization in Realm of Green Monitoring using Broad Area...
A Review On Reactive And Proactive Wireless Sensor Networks Protocols
Oj3425062509
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Hybrid model detection and classification of lung cancer
PDF
August Patch Tuesday
PPTX
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
PPTX
Chapter 5: Probability Theory and Statistics
PDF
Univ-Connecticut-ChatGPT-Presentaion.pdf
PPTX
TLE Review Electricity (Electricity).pptx
PDF
DP Operators-handbook-extract for the Mautical Institute
PPTX
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
PPTX
OMC Textile Division Presentation 2021.pptx
PDF
Microsoft Solutions Partner Drive Digital Transformation with D365.pdf
PDF
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
PDF
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
PPTX
TechTalks-8-2019-Service-Management-ITIL-Refresh-ITIL-4-Framework-Supports-Ou...
PDF
Web App vs Mobile App What Should You Build First.pdf
PDF
ENT215_Completing-a-large-scale-migration-and-modernization-with-AWS.pdf
PDF
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
PDF
Hindi spoken digit analysis for native and non-native speakers
PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
PDF
From MVP to Full-Scale Product A Startup’s Software Journey.pdf
PPTX
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
Hybrid model detection and classification of lung cancer
August Patch Tuesday
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
Chapter 5: Probability Theory and Statistics
Univ-Connecticut-ChatGPT-Presentaion.pdf
TLE Review Electricity (Electricity).pptx
DP Operators-handbook-extract for the Mautical Institute
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
OMC Textile Division Presentation 2021.pptx
Microsoft Solutions Partner Drive Digital Transformation with D365.pdf
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
TechTalks-8-2019-Service-Management-ITIL-Refresh-ITIL-4-Framework-Supports-Ou...
Web App vs Mobile App What Should You Build First.pdf
ENT215_Completing-a-large-scale-migration-and-modernization-with-AWS.pdf
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
Hindi spoken digit analysis for native and non-native speakers
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
From MVP to Full-Scale Product A Startup’s Software Journey.pdf
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx

Wireless underground Sensor Network based on IOT water saved agriculture

  • 1. State of the Art Seminar Presentation on IOT-WUSN(Wireless Underground Sensor networks ) Presented by Yohannes Bishaw EmailJohn.fhy@gmail.com
  • 2. Contents Covered Introduction Types of WUSN Current technology for WUSN WUSN design challenges Conclusion Application of WUSN Communication Architecture WUSN
  • 3. Introduction The Internet of things (IoT) is the inter-networking of physical devices, vehicles (also referred to as "connected devices" and "smart devices"), buildings, and other items—embedded with electronics, software, sensors, actuators, and network connectivity that enable these objects to collect and exchange data.
  • 4. Introduction… In WUSN the node is completely underground.  WUSN consist of wireless devices that operate below the ground surface. These devices are buried completely under dense soil. The main difference between WUSN and the terrestrial wireless sensor network is the communication medium.  Wireless Underground Sensor Networks (WUSN) have the potential to impact a wide variety of new applications including intelligent irrigation, soil information monitoring, etc, the internet of tings for water-saving agriculture.
  • 5. Types of WSN Terrestrial WSN  Distributed in given area either in ad-hoc manner Under Ground WSN Sensors buried underground , agriculture or in cave or mines that monitors underground conditions. Under Water WSN  Sensors are located under water. Multimedia WSN  sensors are equipped with cameras and microphones.
  • 7. Application of wireless underground sensor network Environmental monitoring of the water-saving agriculture Safety detection of mine Quality monitoring of underground facilities Navigation of ground vehicle Intelligent mines
  • 8. Current technology for underground sensing The current system consists of a buried sensor and a data logger on the surface Very useful for a variety of applications Suffer from several shortcomings when compared to wireless underground sensor networks Concealment Ease of deployment Timeliness of data Reliability Coverage density
  • 9. Concealment In current systems the data loggers are deployed on surface Communication is easier as no underground communication is involved Above ground equipment is vulnerable to agricultural and landscaping equipment or unacceptable for aesthetic reasons In WUSN the equipment is underground secure from any theft and protected from damage
  • 10. Ease of deployment Current technology uses wired system Tough to add new sensors or data loggers No scalability issues with WUSN as its fully wireless Timeliness of data Due to wireless nature the data from sensors is forwarded in real time to sink In data loggers the data may be stored for later retrieval
  • 11. Reliability Current systems are fully dependent on data loggers Data logger failure means whole network failure WUSN eliminate the need of data logger Each sensor can forward sensor readings independently WUSN’s are self healing
  • 12. Coverage density Current systems require the sensor to be deployed close to the data logger. It results in less coverage. WUSN eliminate the need of data logger. Sensors can be deployed anywhere , hence increasing the coverage area.
  • 13. WUSN design challenges Power Conservation Topology design Antenna design Environmental extremes
  • 14. Power conservation Underground sensor nodes require more power as attenuation is more Difficult to recharge or replace batteries Solar or any alternate energy form also can’t be used Power conservation is the key Should be implemented by using power efficient hardware and communication protocols
  • 15. Topology design Considerations Application-The density of sensor deployment is dictated by the application. Security application require dense whereas soil monitoring less dense deployment. Power usage minimization-Power usage can be minimized by designing a topology with a large number of short-distance hops rather than a smaller number of long-distance hops. Cost-Deeper and Denser deployments result in more costs. Establish trade offs.
  • 16. Underground topology All sensor devices underground Sink may be underground or above it Can be single depth or multi depth Provides maximum concealment of network Ground air ground path can be used
  • 17. Hybrid topology Mixture of underground and aboveground sensor devices Power intensive underground hops can be traded for less expensive hops in a terrestrial network. Terrestrial devices can be easily recharger or replaced Network is not fully concealed
  • 18. Antenna design Issues to be considered Variable requirements-Devices near the surface air interface have different requirements from those deeper inside as they suffer from reflection. Size-Lower frequencies require larger antennas, this is a challenge as sensor device size should be small. Directionality-The antennas should be oriented for both horizontal and vertical communication.
  • 19. Environmental extremes Underground environment is not ideal for electronic devices Protection from water, animals, insects etc. is needed. Devices should be resistant to pressure of people or objects moving overhead
  • 20. Communication architecture of sensor networks
  • 21. Physical layer Lower frequencies are ideal for WUSN They face less attenuation but the antenna size becomes large Lower frequencies result in lesser bandwidth Due to this the data rate in WUSN is very less
  • 22. Data link layer In WUSN the focus should be on less retransmissions Traditional link layer protocols are contention based or TDMA based Collision avoidance using CTS/RTS involves too much overhead In TDMA based scheme the synchronization may be lost between nodes
  • 23. Network layer Ad hoc routing protocols may be proactive, reactive or geographical Both proactive and reactive are not applicable to WUSN due to signaling overhead and synchronization issues Geographical routing can be helpful for WUSN only in some cases Routing protocols should be dynamic as link costs change due to soil conditions, water etc.
  • 24. Transport layer Performs function of flow control and congestion control Congestion control can be done by routing data to terrestrial relays which are capable of a higher data rate Window based mechanism for flow control may not be applicable to WUSN as retransmissions are more In WUSN retransmission should be less to save energy
  • 25. Conclusion We introduced the concept of WUSNs in which sensor devices are deployed completely below ground. There e are existing applications of underground sensing, such as soil monitoring for agriculture. Sensor Networks are emerging as a great aid in improving agricultural productivity, quality and resource optimization. Very application dependent and close interaction between agriculture scientist and ICT researchers will help. Several challenges like underground wireless channel, less bandwidth, power conservation etc.