SlideShare a Scribd company logo
ANS-3.5 Overview
info@gses.com
2
ANS-3.5 Topic Overview
• Introduce ANS-3.5 Working Group
• ANS-3.5-201x Project Status
• ANS-3.5 Standards Transition Status
• Q&A with ANS-3.5 Working Group
3
ANS-3.5 Standard
Working Group Membership
Officers
• Chair - Jim Florence (Cooper)
• Vice Chair - Bob Felker (Western Services Corp.)
• Secretary - Keith Welchel (Oconee)
• Editor - Butch Colby (L3 MAPPS)
• Style Editor - SK Chang (Millstone)
• Parliamentarian - Larry Vick (NRC)
4
ANS-3.5 Standard
Working Group Membership
• Bill Fraser (Westinghouse)
• Robert Goldman (Grand Gulf)
• David Goodman (Comanche Peak)
• Jody Lawter (Summer)
• George McCullough (GSE)
• Michael Petersen (Monticello/Prairie Island)
• Pablo Rey (Tecnatom – Spain)
• James Sale (North Anna)
• Frank Tarselli (Independent)
5
ANS-3.5 Working Group
Cooper Station – Nov 2014
6
ANS-3.5-201x Scope
Approved scope:
• This standard establishes the functional requirements for
full scope nuclear power plant control room simulators that
are subject to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
regulation for use in operator training and examination.
• The standard also establishes criteria for the scope of
simulation, performance, and functional capabilities of
nuclear power plant control room simulators.
• This standard does not establish criteria for the use of
simulators in operator training programs.
7
ANS-3.5-201x Project Status
Final effort:
• ANS-3.5-201x submitted to the American Nuclear Society on
01/16/14 to begin formal review process
• ANS Large Light Water Reactors Consensus (LLWRC) Committee
completed review on 03/16/14
• Public review period closed 09/10/14
• Working Group comment resolution (LLWRC & public) through
01/16/15 (last meeting in Frederick, MD)
• Expect to be published in 2015 (ANS-3.5-2015)
8
ANS-3.5-201x Project Status
What’s different in the 201x standard?
• Addressed comments from the 2009 standard review
effort
• Address next generation simulators
• Deleted/modified definitions; introduced “discrepancy”
in lieu of noticeable difference, deviation and
deficiency
• Deleted malfunction list in Section 3.1.4
9
ANS-3.5-201x Project Status
Moved verification/validation testing to Section 5: Configuration
Management
Moved assessment of deviations to Section 5
Changed Section 3.4/4.4 to “Performance Testing”
Defined testing periodicities
– Limits of simulation
– Steady-state & normal evolutions
– Malfunctions
– Physical fidelity & human factors
– Instructor station
– Real time & repeatability
10
ANS-3.5-201x Project Status
Defined testing configurations for various performance tests
(fully integrated vs. non-integrated)
No changes to scenario-based testing!!!
Section 5:
– Initial design vs. change control
– Performance benchmark (steady-state/transient testing)
– Noticeable differences
– Resolution of discrepancies
– Verification/validation testing
11
ANS-3.5-201x Project Status
Appendix B deleted; transient list deleted, steady-
state parameters moved to Section 4
Clarified that previously selected transients may be
used (for legacy plants)
Re-lettered Appendices C & D
Readability/clarity
12
ANS-3.5 Standards Adoption
History
A full history of full-scope nuclear power plant (NPP)
simulators as related to the ANSI/ANS-3.5 standards
Earliest NPP simulators were constructed upon specifications
only (through the '70s)
 General Electric (Dresden 2)
 Babcock and Wilcox (Rancho Seco)
 Combustion Engineering (Calvert Cliffs)
 Westinghouse (Zion)
 Indian Point 2 (Consolidated Edison of New York)
 TVA (Browns Ferry, Sequoyah, Watts Bar)
13
The age of utility-owned simulators began in the late'70s (ConEd –
Indian Point 2, TVA – Browns Ferry 2/Sequoyah/Watts Bar, VEPCO -
Surry).
The '80s was the time of a utility-owned simulator for every unique
reference unit.
Simulators for the new reactor phase are being purchased within the
nuclear steam supply system contract (all COLs applications are
referenced to ANS-3.5-1998).
Vogtle 3&4, Summer 2&3
New reactor phase of simulators are scheduled for delivery in order
that operators can be trained and licensed before criticality.
ANS-3.5 Standards Adoption
History
14
Decommissioned Simulators
Crystal River – April 2013
Kewaunee – May 2013
SONGS – July 2013
Vermont Yankee – December 2014
15
ANS-3.5 Transition Status
Simulators on 1985 standard
Simulators on 1993 standard
Simulators on 1998 standard
Simulators on 2009 standard
ANS-3.5 in 2013
16
ANS-3.5 Transition Status
Simulators on 1985 standard
Simulators on 1993 standard
Simulators on 1998 standard
Simulators on 2009 standard
ANS-3.5 in 2014
17
ANS-3.5 Commitments
(Incomplete data before 2006)
18
ANS-3.5 Web Pages
The ANS-3.5 web pages can be accessed via:
– www.ans.org
– https://www.usug.org/
Find:
– Scope statement
– Membership contact information
– Meeting locations
– Meeting minutes
– Link to ANS-3.5 clarifications
– How to submit clarification requests
For more information:
Go to: www.GSES.com
Call: +1 800.638.7912
Email: info@gses.com
Follow us on:
Twitter @GSESystems
Facebook.com/GSESystems

More Related Content

PDF
Project - Various Unit - Kaiwan
PPTX
RCC OT Case Studies - JYoung RCC2015
PDF
Aashto guide specifications for lrfd seismic
PPT
ASDSO NE Regional 2009 Presentation
PPT
Bridge structural foundations-and_earth_retaining_structures
PPTX
The osterberg cell static loading test
PDF
Viet Le (1) (1)
DOCX
GSG Project Experience
Project - Various Unit - Kaiwan
RCC OT Case Studies - JYoung RCC2015
Aashto guide specifications for lrfd seismic
ASDSO NE Regional 2009 Presentation
Bridge structural foundations-and_earth_retaining_structures
The osterberg cell static loading test
Viet Le (1) (1)
GSG Project Experience

What's hot (10)

PDF
Supervision of piling works, ACES, 2011, Singapore
PDF
ICDE2008, Singapore
PDF
2. Benoit Latapie - Foundations for infrastructure projects in MENA
PDF
GeoSS,18SEAGS,CTS,04062013, A
PDF
MSc Fractured Reservoirs
PPTX
Hunter Mill Road and Sunset Hills Road Study: Community Meeting #5 - Sept. 15...
PDF
Shear band test procedure
PDF
Jason Abendroth Resume_10_2015
PDF
ICDE2006, Singapore
PDF
Bullock bidirectional testing
Supervision of piling works, ACES, 2011, Singapore
ICDE2008, Singapore
2. Benoit Latapie - Foundations for infrastructure projects in MENA
GeoSS,18SEAGS,CTS,04062013, A
MSc Fractured Reservoirs
Hunter Mill Road and Sunset Hills Road Study: Community Meeting #5 - Sept. 15...
Shear band test procedure
Jason Abendroth Resume_10_2015
ICDE2006, Singapore
Bullock bidirectional testing
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Mochovce Unit 3 & 4 Full-Scope Simulator Project Key Points and Successes
PPTX
Human Performance improvement for the Turkish Energy Sector
PDF
Proposal For a Nuclear Reactor Operations Course at Purdue University
PDF
Are Your Employees Playing Games?
PPTX
Solving Refining & Petrochemicals Workforce Development Challenges with Perfo...
PPTX
Virtual Commissioning and Real-Time Training for Increasing Performance
PDF
Simulator Management: Ideas for Today and Tomorrow
PPTX
VIZRAD - Evolving Simulaton in Radiation Training
PDF
Simulation Training Post Fukushima
PPTX
Control & HMI Emulation Project
PDF
Designing a High-Fidelity Full-Scope Training Simulator for a Triple-Pressure...
PPTX
Total Training Solution - Entry2Expert
PDF
How to Improve Operator Training Throughput Using Screening & Selection
PPTX
Improving Operational Performance With Smarter, Cost-Effective Training Programs
PPTX
Multi-Unit Severe Accident Simulation
PDF
Applying Safety DNA Analytics to Enhance Your E2E Workforce Process
PPTX
Innovation in Nuclear Simulation
PDF
Process Modeling Simulation
PPTX
Implementation of Dynamic Simulation for Engineering and Human Factors
PPT
Real-Time Simulation for Design of New Nuclear Plants
Mochovce Unit 3 & 4 Full-Scope Simulator Project Key Points and Successes
Human Performance improvement for the Turkish Energy Sector
Proposal For a Nuclear Reactor Operations Course at Purdue University
Are Your Employees Playing Games?
Solving Refining & Petrochemicals Workforce Development Challenges with Perfo...
Virtual Commissioning and Real-Time Training for Increasing Performance
Simulator Management: Ideas for Today and Tomorrow
VIZRAD - Evolving Simulaton in Radiation Training
Simulation Training Post Fukushima
Control & HMI Emulation Project
Designing a High-Fidelity Full-Scope Training Simulator for a Triple-Pressure...
Total Training Solution - Entry2Expert
How to Improve Operator Training Throughput Using Screening & Selection
Improving Operational Performance With Smarter, Cost-Effective Training Programs
Multi-Unit Severe Accident Simulation
Applying Safety DNA Analytics to Enhance Your E2E Workforce Process
Innovation in Nuclear Simulation
Process Modeling Simulation
Implementation of Dynamic Simulation for Engineering and Human Factors
Real-Time Simulation for Design of New Nuclear Plants
Ad

More from GSE Systems, Inc. (13)

PPTX
Hyperspring Implementation of BWROG EP/SAG CONTE 2019
PPTX
GSE Second Simulator Address Plant Training Needs CONTE 2019
PPTX
GSE Gaining Value From Virtual Control Panels CONTE 2019
PPTX
Onyx relap5 Presentation from SCS 2019
PDF
Increasing ROI Through Simulation and the 'Digital Twin'
PPTX
Investigating Ways to Prevent Electrical Arc Flash
PPTX
GSE Performance Improvement Solutions
PDF
PSA-HD Simulator for Severe Accidents
PDF
Potential Model Changes as a Result of Fukushima
PDF
High-Fidelity Operator Training Simulator for CCGT Implemented Before Plant C...
PDF
Dynamic Simulation for HFE & Control System Design Validation
PDF
Fossil Power Simulator Efficiencies When Using Automated Testing
PDF
E-learning, 3D and Simulation for Competency Development
Hyperspring Implementation of BWROG EP/SAG CONTE 2019
GSE Second Simulator Address Plant Training Needs CONTE 2019
GSE Gaining Value From Virtual Control Panels CONTE 2019
Onyx relap5 Presentation from SCS 2019
Increasing ROI Through Simulation and the 'Digital Twin'
Investigating Ways to Prevent Electrical Arc Flash
GSE Performance Improvement Solutions
PSA-HD Simulator for Severe Accidents
Potential Model Changes as a Result of Fukushima
High-Fidelity Operator Training Simulator for CCGT Implemented Before Plant C...
Dynamic Simulation for HFE & Control System Design Validation
Fossil Power Simulator Efficiencies When Using Automated Testing
E-learning, 3D and Simulation for Competency Development

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
DP Operators-handbook-extract for the Mautical Institute
PDF
project resource management chapter-09.pdf
PPTX
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
PDF
Encapsulation_ Review paper, used for researhc scholars
PDF
Univ-Connecticut-ChatGPT-Presentaion.pdf
PDF
From MVP to Full-Scale Product A Startup’s Software Journey.pdf
PDF
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
PPTX
1. Introduction to Computer Programming.pptx
PDF
Mushroom cultivation and it's methods.pdf
PDF
Enhancing emotion recognition model for a student engagement use case through...
PPTX
cloud_computing_Infrastucture_as_cloud_p
PDF
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
PDF
Microsoft Solutions Partner Drive Digital Transformation with D365.pdf
PDF
A comparative study of natural language inference in Swahili using monolingua...
PDF
Accuracy of neural networks in brain wave diagnosis of schizophrenia
PDF
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
PPTX
TechTalks-8-2019-Service-Management-ITIL-Refresh-ITIL-4-Framework-Supports-Ou...
PDF
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
PDF
ENT215_Completing-a-large-scale-migration-and-modernization-with-AWS.pdf
DP Operators-handbook-extract for the Mautical Institute
project resource management chapter-09.pdf
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
Encapsulation_ Review paper, used for researhc scholars
Univ-Connecticut-ChatGPT-Presentaion.pdf
From MVP to Full-Scale Product A Startup’s Software Journey.pdf
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
1. Introduction to Computer Programming.pptx
Mushroom cultivation and it's methods.pdf
Enhancing emotion recognition model for a student engagement use case through...
cloud_computing_Infrastucture_as_cloud_p
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
Microsoft Solutions Partner Drive Digital Transformation with D365.pdf
A comparative study of natural language inference in Swahili using monolingua...
Accuracy of neural networks in brain wave diagnosis of schizophrenia
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
TechTalks-8-2019-Service-Management-ITIL-Refresh-ITIL-4-Framework-Supports-Ou...
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
ENT215_Completing-a-large-scale-migration-and-modernization-with-AWS.pdf

ANS-3.5 Overview

  • 2. 2 ANS-3.5 Topic Overview • Introduce ANS-3.5 Working Group • ANS-3.5-201x Project Status • ANS-3.5 Standards Transition Status • Q&A with ANS-3.5 Working Group
  • 3. 3 ANS-3.5 Standard Working Group Membership Officers • Chair - Jim Florence (Cooper) • Vice Chair - Bob Felker (Western Services Corp.) • Secretary - Keith Welchel (Oconee) • Editor - Butch Colby (L3 MAPPS) • Style Editor - SK Chang (Millstone) • Parliamentarian - Larry Vick (NRC)
  • 4. 4 ANS-3.5 Standard Working Group Membership • Bill Fraser (Westinghouse) • Robert Goldman (Grand Gulf) • David Goodman (Comanche Peak) • Jody Lawter (Summer) • George McCullough (GSE) • Michael Petersen (Monticello/Prairie Island) • Pablo Rey (Tecnatom – Spain) • James Sale (North Anna) • Frank Tarselli (Independent)
  • 5. 5 ANS-3.5 Working Group Cooper Station – Nov 2014
  • 6. 6 ANS-3.5-201x Scope Approved scope: • This standard establishes the functional requirements for full scope nuclear power plant control room simulators that are subject to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulation for use in operator training and examination. • The standard also establishes criteria for the scope of simulation, performance, and functional capabilities of nuclear power plant control room simulators. • This standard does not establish criteria for the use of simulators in operator training programs.
  • 7. 7 ANS-3.5-201x Project Status Final effort: • ANS-3.5-201x submitted to the American Nuclear Society on 01/16/14 to begin formal review process • ANS Large Light Water Reactors Consensus (LLWRC) Committee completed review on 03/16/14 • Public review period closed 09/10/14 • Working Group comment resolution (LLWRC & public) through 01/16/15 (last meeting in Frederick, MD) • Expect to be published in 2015 (ANS-3.5-2015)
  • 8. 8 ANS-3.5-201x Project Status What’s different in the 201x standard? • Addressed comments from the 2009 standard review effort • Address next generation simulators • Deleted/modified definitions; introduced “discrepancy” in lieu of noticeable difference, deviation and deficiency • Deleted malfunction list in Section 3.1.4
  • 9. 9 ANS-3.5-201x Project Status Moved verification/validation testing to Section 5: Configuration Management Moved assessment of deviations to Section 5 Changed Section 3.4/4.4 to “Performance Testing” Defined testing periodicities – Limits of simulation – Steady-state & normal evolutions – Malfunctions – Physical fidelity & human factors – Instructor station – Real time & repeatability
  • 10. 10 ANS-3.5-201x Project Status Defined testing configurations for various performance tests (fully integrated vs. non-integrated) No changes to scenario-based testing!!! Section 5: – Initial design vs. change control – Performance benchmark (steady-state/transient testing) – Noticeable differences – Resolution of discrepancies – Verification/validation testing
  • 11. 11 ANS-3.5-201x Project Status Appendix B deleted; transient list deleted, steady- state parameters moved to Section 4 Clarified that previously selected transients may be used (for legacy plants) Re-lettered Appendices C & D Readability/clarity
  • 12. 12 ANS-3.5 Standards Adoption History A full history of full-scope nuclear power plant (NPP) simulators as related to the ANSI/ANS-3.5 standards Earliest NPP simulators were constructed upon specifications only (through the '70s)  General Electric (Dresden 2)  Babcock and Wilcox (Rancho Seco)  Combustion Engineering (Calvert Cliffs)  Westinghouse (Zion)  Indian Point 2 (Consolidated Edison of New York)  TVA (Browns Ferry, Sequoyah, Watts Bar)
  • 13. 13 The age of utility-owned simulators began in the late'70s (ConEd – Indian Point 2, TVA – Browns Ferry 2/Sequoyah/Watts Bar, VEPCO - Surry). The '80s was the time of a utility-owned simulator for every unique reference unit. Simulators for the new reactor phase are being purchased within the nuclear steam supply system contract (all COLs applications are referenced to ANS-3.5-1998). Vogtle 3&4, Summer 2&3 New reactor phase of simulators are scheduled for delivery in order that operators can be trained and licensed before criticality. ANS-3.5 Standards Adoption History
  • 14. 14 Decommissioned Simulators Crystal River – April 2013 Kewaunee – May 2013 SONGS – July 2013 Vermont Yankee – December 2014
  • 15. 15 ANS-3.5 Transition Status Simulators on 1985 standard Simulators on 1993 standard Simulators on 1998 standard Simulators on 2009 standard ANS-3.5 in 2013
  • 16. 16 ANS-3.5 Transition Status Simulators on 1985 standard Simulators on 1993 standard Simulators on 1998 standard Simulators on 2009 standard ANS-3.5 in 2014
  • 18. 18 ANS-3.5 Web Pages The ANS-3.5 web pages can be accessed via: – www.ans.org – https://www.usug.org/ Find: – Scope statement – Membership contact information – Meeting locations – Meeting minutes – Link to ANS-3.5 clarifications – How to submit clarification requests
  • 19. For more information: Go to: www.GSES.com Call: +1 800.638.7912 Email: info@gses.com Follow us on: Twitter @GSESystems Facebook.com/GSESystems