GREEN BUILDING STRATEGIES & PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE
Download as PPTX, PDF11 likes4,521 views
The document discusses green building strategies and project management practices aimed at achieving sustainability. It defines green buildings as those designed and operated to enhance performance in environmental, economic, health, and productivity aspects. The text outlines effective communication strategies and the integration of project teams to ensure the successful delivery of sustainable construction projects within cost constraints.
GREEN BUILDING STRATEGIES & PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE
- 1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY WARANGAL GREEN BUILDING STRATEGIES & PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE By R RAGHAVENDRA ……121568 I/II M.Tech, CTM
- 2. CONTENTS: • INTRODUCTION • DEFINING GREEN BUILDING • WHY BUILD GREEN?.. • GREEN BUILDING STRATEGIES • COSTS AND PROFITABILITY • EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION TO CONTAIN COSTS • ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION • GREENING PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES • CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS • REFERENCES
- 5. DEFINING GREEN BUILDING: (1) Designed, constructed, and operated to boost environmental, economic, health and productivity performance (U.S. Green Building Council 2003) (2) The careful design, construction, operation, and reuse or removal of the built environment => energy-efficient, sustainable, high performance (McGraw-Hill Construction 2006, Green building smart market report) (3) (i) increasing the efficiency (ii) reducing impacts on human health and the environment (Cassidy 2003, White Paper on Sustainability)
- 8. COST & PROFITABILITY: A survey by McGraw Hill Construction • 54% of Respondents ( To reduce energy cost) • 24% of Respondents ( value to environment)
- 9. EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION: 9 Core Strategies: • Working collaboratively • Designing cross functionally • Design to achieve vision & solutions • Study the details and big picture • Operating under constrained schedule • Communicating in short feed back loops • A collaborative planning process • Including a multiday charrette • National Charrette Institute (NCI 2007) Working on-site • Producing a feasible plan
- 10. Green PM Approach to Construction Vs Conventional construction PHASE 1: PHASE 2: Feasibility Project need Assessment Design Initial budget and schedule Project manager Selection Zoning approval Preliminary site analysis and plan Design team Selection Design charrette Construction Document development Final site selection Government permitting Review Project bidding
- 12. BEGINNING WITH THE END IN MIND:
- 13. INTEGRATING THE PROJECT TEAM:
- 14. DESIGNING WITH THE WHOLE TEAM APPROACH:
- 15. USING BONUSES & REWARDS IN PROJECT CONTRACTING:
- 16. Greening project management practices can significantly improve the ability of a sustainable construction project to be delivered within acceptable cost constraints.
- 17. REFERENCES: • • • • • • • • • • • Cassidy, R. (2003). “WHITE PAPER ON SUSTAINABILITY.” Build. Des. Constr., 1, 1–48. Davis Langdon.(2007). “THE COST & BENEFIT OF ACHIEVING GREEN BUILDINGS”, Davis Langdon and Seah International, Sydney, Australia. Kibert, C. (2005). “SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION: GREEN BUILDING DESIGN AND DELIVERY”, Wiley, Hoboken, N.J. McGraw-Hill Construction. (2006). “GREEN BUILDING SMART MARKET REPORT: DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION INTELLIGENCE”, New York. National Charrette Institute (NCI) (2007). “WHAT IS A CHARRETTE?” (http://www.charretteinstitute.org/charrette.html)(June 3, 2007). Reed, W., and Gordon, E. (2000). “INTEGRATED DESIGN AND BUILDING PROCESS: WHAT RESEARCH AND METHODOLOGIES ARE NEEDED?” Build. Res. Inf., 28(5/6), 325–337 Sappe, R. (2007). “PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS FOR BUILDING OWNERS AND DEVELOPERS” BUILDINGS”, 101(4), 22–22. The Economist. (2004). “THE RISE OF GREEN BUILDING”, 373(8404), Special section 17–23. U.S. Green Building Council. (2006a). “BUILDING A GREENER FUTURE. SPECIAL ADVERTISING SECTION IN PARTNERSHIP WITH FORTUNE.” Fortune, March 20, S2–S14. U.S. Green Building Council. (2006b). “PROJECT PROFILE: FOSSIL RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL, FORT COLLINS, COLORADO.” USGBC 2006 Case Studies,