SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Logical Fallacies
EXIT
Continue…
A logical fallacy is a statement that contains faulty
reasoning. Don’t give your reader a reason to doubt
your information. Persuasive writing especially
requires sound logic to support opinions.
MENU
Logical Fallacies
EXIT
What’s wrong with this statement?
Either we raise taxes, or we close the city parks. It’s
that simple.
Click to see an analysis
A logical fallacy is a statement that contains faulty
reasoning. Don’t give your reader a reason to doubt
your information. Persuasive writing especially
requires sound logic to support opinions.
PREVIOUS MENU
Logical Fallacies
EXIT
This statement allows only two options while in fact there
are many alternatives that would allow the parks to remain
open. The statement is too extreme to seem reasonable.
Either we raise taxes, or we close the city parks. It’s
that simple.
A logical fallacy is a statement that contains faulty
reasoning. Don’t give your reader a reason to doubt
your information. Persuasive writing especially
requires sound logic to support opinions.
Next
PREVIOUS MENU
Common logical fallacies include the following.
Click to choose the fallacy you want to explore.
EXIT
MENU
Logical Fallacies
MENU
•Overgeneralization
•Circular reasoning
•False analogy
•Either/or reasoning
•Single cause
•False cause
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Continue…
Overgeneralization
An overgeneralization is a statement so broad that it
can easily be disproved. Look for words like all,
everyone, no one, always, never, none, when you
revise.
MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Overgeneralization
An overgeneralization is a statement so broad that it
can easily be disproved. Look for words like all,
everyone, no one, always, never, none, when you
revise.
What is the overgeneralization in this sentence?
Everyone loves the Weird Cats’ new song.
Click to see the overgeneralization
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Overgeneralization
An overgeneralization is a statement so broad that it
can easily be disproved. Look for words like all,
everyone, no one, always, never, none, when you
revise.
What is the overgeneralization in this sentence?
Everyone loves the Weird Cats’ new song.
Click to see a revision
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Overgeneralization
An overgeneralization is a statement so broad that it
can easily be disproved. Look for words like all,
everyone, no one, always, never, none, when you
revise.
Everyone loves the Weird Cats’ new song.
ORIGINAL
Many people love the Weird Cats’ new song.
REVISED
Menu
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Continue…
Logical Fallacies
Circular Reasoning
An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating
it in different words is circular reasoning.
MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Click to see the repeated idea
Circular Reasoning
An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating
it in different words is circular reasoning.
What is the repeated idea in this sentence?
We should protect endangered animals because it is
important to help threatened wildlife survive.
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Circular Reasoning
An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating
it in different words is circular reasoning.
What is the repeated idea in this sentence?
We should protect endangered animals because it is
important to help threatened wildlife survive.
Continue…
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Circular Reasoning
An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating
it in different words is circular reasoning.
How would you revise to avoid this circular reasoning?
We should protect endangered animals because it is
important to help threatened wildlife survive.
Click to see a revision
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Circular Reasoning
An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating
it in different words is circular reasoning.
We should protect endangered animals because it is
important to help threatened wildlife survive.
PREVIOUS MENU
help threatened wildlife survive.
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Circular Reasoning
An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating
it in different words is circular reasoning.
We should protect endangered animals because it is
important to
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Circular Reasoning
An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating
it in different words is circular reasoning.
We should protect endangered animals because it is
important to
PREVIOUS MENU
maintain the diversity of animal life.
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Circular Reasoning
An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating
it in different words is circular reasoning.
This revised sentence gives a specific reason why endangered
animals should be protected: to maintain the diversity of
animal life.
Menu
PREVIOUS MENU
We should protect endangered animals because it is
important tomaintain the diversity of animal life.
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Continue…
False Analogy
A false analogy is a comparison between two things
that are different in some essential way.
MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
False Analogy
A false analogy is a comparison between two things
that are different in some essential way.
What is wrong with this comparison?
Using a computer without training is like driving a car
without a license.
Click to see an analysis
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
False Analogy
A false analogy is a comparison between two things
that are different in some essential way.
This argument compares using a computer with driving a
car. The two activities do not compare in terms of the
consequences of lack of training.
Using a computer without training is like driving a car
without a license.
Menu
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Continue…
Either/Or Reasoning
An either/or fallacy is a statement suggesting that
there are only two possible ways to view a situation
or only two options to choose from.
MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Either/Or Reasoning
An either/or fallacy is a statement suggesting that
there are only two possible ways to view a situation
or only two options to choose from.
What other possibilities can you imagine for this example?
Either we build a new airport, or we watch the economy of
our community die.
Click to see an analysis
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Either/Or Reasoning
An either/or fallacy is a statement suggesting that
there are only two possible ways to view a situation
or only two options to choose from.
The economy may not thrive as it would with a new airport, but it
will probably not die.
Either we build a new airport, or we watch the economy
of our community die.
Click to see a revision
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Either/Or Reasoning
An either/or fallacy is a statement suggesting that
there are only two possible ways to view a situation
or only two options to choose from.
Either we build a new airport, or we watch the economy
of our community die.
ORIGINAL
Building a new airport will help our local economy grow.
REVISED
Menu
This revision removes the limited options and presents a more
reasonable statement.
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Continue…
Single Cause
In a single cause fallacy, the writer assumes that an
event has just one cause when there are actually
multiple causes.
MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Single Cause
In a single cause fallacy, the writer assumes that an
event has just one cause when there are actually
multiple causes.
Can you think of other possible reasons why the team might
be terrible?
Our team is terrible because our manager is terrible.
Click to see a revision
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Single Cause
In a single cause fallacy, the writer assumes that an
event has just one cause when there are actually
multiple causes.
Our team is terrible because our manager is terrible.
ORIGINAL
Our team is terrible because our manager is terrible, and too
many of our players lack the skills to compete in this
league.
REVISED
Menu
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
Continue…
False Cause
Just because one event occurred after another in
time, the first event may not have caused the second
event. Don’t let that kind of false cause reasoning
show up in your writing.
MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
False Cause
Just because one event occurred after another in
time, the first event may not have caused the second
event. Don’t let that kind of false cause reasoning
show up in your writing.
Are these two events actually connected?
The Continental Congress approved the Declaration of
Independence on July 4, 1776. As a result, British warships
arrived to attack New York Harbor eight days later.
Click to see an analysis
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
False Cause
Just because one event occurred after another in
time, the first event may not have caused the second
event. Don’t let that kind of false cause reasoning
show up in your writing.
Although it’s reasonable to assume the warships were sent
in response to the Declaration of Independence, news of the
event didn’t travel that fast. The ships were underway on
their mission to attack New York well before July 4.
The Continental Congress approved the Declaration of
Independence on July 4, 1776. As a result, British warships
arrived to attack New York Harbor eight days later.
Click to see a revision
PREVIOUS MENU
EXIT
Logical Fallacies
False Cause
Just because one event occurred after another in
time, the first event may not have caused the second
event. Don’t let that kind of false cause reasoning
show up in your writing.
The Continental Congress approved the Declaration of
Independence on July 4, 1776. As a result, British warships
arrived to attack New York Harbor eight days later.
ORIGINAL
The Continental Congress approved the Declaration of
Independence on July 4, 1776, but the British had already
decided to attack New York Harbor. The warships arrived on
July 12.
REVISED
Menu
PREVIOUS MENU

More Related Content

PDF
Fallacies
PPTX
Logical Fallacies
PPTX
Informational essay
PPT
9 Logical Fallacies
PPT
Logical fallacy examples
PPT
Logical fallacies powerpoint
PPTX
Literary Criticism: Structuralist Approach
PPTX
PPT FOR COT (4TH QUARTER).pptx
Fallacies
Logical Fallacies
Informational essay
9 Logical Fallacies
Logical fallacy examples
Logical fallacies powerpoint
Literary Criticism: Structuralist Approach
PPT FOR COT (4TH QUARTER).pptx

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Using Appropriate Grammatical Signals.pptx
PPTX
LANGUAGE OF RESEARCH, CAMPAIGN, AND ADVOCACIES.pptx
PPT
Validity of Evidence
PPT
Logical fallacies
PPTX
Types of characters
PPTX
Bias and prejudice
PPT
Symbolism
PPTX
Expressing Permission, Obligation and Prohibition using Modals.pptx
PPTX
Fallacies week7
PPTX
Types of Characters
PPTX
informative writing
PPTX
MODAL VERBS
PPTX
PAGGAWA NG DOKUMENTASYON SA FILIPINO (GABAY SA PAGGAWA).pptx
PPTX
What is Parallelism?
PPTX
PPTX
Lord of the cranes
PPT
Elements of a story English literature
PPTX
Features and characterization of one act play
PPTX
Reading_Lesson 7 Explicit and Implicit Claims in a Text
Using Appropriate Grammatical Signals.pptx
LANGUAGE OF RESEARCH, CAMPAIGN, AND ADVOCACIES.pptx
Validity of Evidence
Logical fallacies
Types of characters
Bias and prejudice
Symbolism
Expressing Permission, Obligation and Prohibition using Modals.pptx
Fallacies week7
Types of Characters
informative writing
MODAL VERBS
PAGGAWA NG DOKUMENTASYON SA FILIPINO (GABAY SA PAGGAWA).pptx
What is Parallelism?
Lord of the cranes
Elements of a story English literature
Features and characterization of one act play
Reading_Lesson 7 Explicit and Implicit Claims in a Text
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPT
Recognizing logical fallacies and emotional appeals
PPTX
7 Logical Fallacies
PDF
Mathematics in the Modern World
PPTX
Logical fallacies for english
PPT
Logical Fallacies
PPTX
Chapter 5 fallacies
PPT
Skepticism at work - Logical Fallacies. ASQ Buffalo
PDF
Sandel intro
PDF
Logical fallacies
PDF
How to Think: Introduction to Logic, Lecture 5 with David Gordon - Mises Acad...
PPTX
Logical fallacies
PDF
Logical Fallacies
PPT
Logical Fallacies Basics
PPTX
Got Logic? Critical Thinking, Logical Structures and Logical Fallacies
PPTX
Name that fallacy
PPTX
Logical fallacies
PPT
Bassham3 powerpoint lecturenotes_ch06
PPTX
Introduction to Fallacies
PDF
Logical Fallacies
PPT
Logical fallacies
Recognizing logical fallacies and emotional appeals
7 Logical Fallacies
Mathematics in the Modern World
Logical fallacies for english
Logical Fallacies
Chapter 5 fallacies
Skepticism at work - Logical Fallacies. ASQ Buffalo
Sandel intro
Logical fallacies
How to Think: Introduction to Logic, Lecture 5 with David Gordon - Mises Acad...
Logical fallacies
Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies Basics
Got Logic? Critical Thinking, Logical Structures and Logical Fallacies
Name that fallacy
Logical fallacies
Bassham3 powerpoint lecturenotes_ch06
Introduction to Fallacies
Logical Fallacies
Logical fallacies
Ad

Similar to Logical fallacies (20)

PPT
FAULTY -REASONING/logic in writing essays.ppt
PPTX
Logical Fallacies 18-05-2020.pptx
PDF
LIB440 Week 7.1
PPT
Reason Continued
PPT
Reason the final chapter
PPTX
Logical-fallacies-grade-9-englishhhh.pptx
DOCX
4 Mistakes in Reasoning The World of Fallaciesboy at chalkboar.docx
PPT
logical-reasoning-conceptualization-and-critical-thinking.ppt
PPTX
Logical fallacies and everything that needs
DOCX
ENG122 Composition II An Introduction to Logic and Syllogis.docx
PPT
Chapter 27 Evaluating Information
PDF
Logical Fallacies
PPTX
debate namagagamit sa mga pagtatalumpati
PPT
Logical Fallacies
PPTX
Critical Thinking 04 Soundness
PPTX
DOCX
ENG122 Composition II An Introduction to Logic and Syllogis.docx
DOCX
Logic & critical thinking
PDF
Week 4.1 deductive & inductive reasoning
PPT
Logical Fallacies (Argumentation and Debate).ppt
FAULTY -REASONING/logic in writing essays.ppt
Logical Fallacies 18-05-2020.pptx
LIB440 Week 7.1
Reason Continued
Reason the final chapter
Logical-fallacies-grade-9-englishhhh.pptx
4 Mistakes in Reasoning The World of Fallaciesboy at chalkboar.docx
logical-reasoning-conceptualization-and-critical-thinking.ppt
Logical fallacies and everything that needs
ENG122 Composition II An Introduction to Logic and Syllogis.docx
Chapter 27 Evaluating Information
Logical Fallacies
debate namagagamit sa mga pagtatalumpati
Logical Fallacies
Critical Thinking 04 Soundness
ENG122 Composition II An Introduction to Logic and Syllogis.docx
Logic & critical thinking
Week 4.1 deductive & inductive reasoning
Logical Fallacies (Argumentation and Debate).ppt

More from Donna Moreau (13)

PPTX
Setting presentation
PPTX
Setting presentation
POTX
What is a thesis statement
PDF
Theme lesson-2-160120134010 (1)
PPT
Summarizing practice
PPT
Summarizing lesson
PPTX
2016 2017 school year activity assembly jo mun presentation
PPTX
Donna's elements of fiction
PPT
Theme lesson-2
PPS
Persuasive strategies
PPT
Transitions
PPT
Conclusions
PPTX
Essay Introductions
Setting presentation
Setting presentation
What is a thesis statement
Theme lesson-2-160120134010 (1)
Summarizing practice
Summarizing lesson
2016 2017 school year activity assembly jo mun presentation
Donna's elements of fiction
Theme lesson-2
Persuasive strategies
Transitions
Conclusions
Essay Introductions

Logical fallacies

  • 1. Logical Fallacies EXIT Continue… A logical fallacy is a statement that contains faulty reasoning. Don’t give your reader a reason to doubt your information. Persuasive writing especially requires sound logic to support opinions. MENU
  • 2. Logical Fallacies EXIT What’s wrong with this statement? Either we raise taxes, or we close the city parks. It’s that simple. Click to see an analysis A logical fallacy is a statement that contains faulty reasoning. Don’t give your reader a reason to doubt your information. Persuasive writing especially requires sound logic to support opinions. PREVIOUS MENU
  • 3. Logical Fallacies EXIT This statement allows only two options while in fact there are many alternatives that would allow the parks to remain open. The statement is too extreme to seem reasonable. Either we raise taxes, or we close the city parks. It’s that simple. A logical fallacy is a statement that contains faulty reasoning. Don’t give your reader a reason to doubt your information. Persuasive writing especially requires sound logic to support opinions. Next PREVIOUS MENU
  • 4. Common logical fallacies include the following. Click to choose the fallacy you want to explore. EXIT MENU Logical Fallacies MENU •Overgeneralization •Circular reasoning •False analogy •Either/or reasoning •Single cause •False cause
  • 5. EXIT Logical Fallacies Continue… Overgeneralization An overgeneralization is a statement so broad that it can easily be disproved. Look for words like all, everyone, no one, always, never, none, when you revise. MENU
  • 6. EXIT Logical Fallacies Overgeneralization An overgeneralization is a statement so broad that it can easily be disproved. Look for words like all, everyone, no one, always, never, none, when you revise. What is the overgeneralization in this sentence? Everyone loves the Weird Cats’ new song. Click to see the overgeneralization PREVIOUS MENU
  • 7. EXIT Logical Fallacies Overgeneralization An overgeneralization is a statement so broad that it can easily be disproved. Look for words like all, everyone, no one, always, never, none, when you revise. What is the overgeneralization in this sentence? Everyone loves the Weird Cats’ new song. Click to see a revision PREVIOUS MENU
  • 8. EXIT Logical Fallacies Overgeneralization An overgeneralization is a statement so broad that it can easily be disproved. Look for words like all, everyone, no one, always, never, none, when you revise. Everyone loves the Weird Cats’ new song. ORIGINAL Many people love the Weird Cats’ new song. REVISED Menu PREVIOUS MENU
  • 9. EXIT Continue… Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. MENU
  • 10. EXIT Logical Fallacies Click to see the repeated idea Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. What is the repeated idea in this sentence? We should protect endangered animals because it is important to help threatened wildlife survive. PREVIOUS MENU
  • 11. EXIT Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. What is the repeated idea in this sentence? We should protect endangered animals because it is important to help threatened wildlife survive. Continue… PREVIOUS MENU
  • 12. EXIT Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. How would you revise to avoid this circular reasoning? We should protect endangered animals because it is important to help threatened wildlife survive. Click to see a revision PREVIOUS MENU
  • 13. EXIT Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. We should protect endangered animals because it is important to help threatened wildlife survive. PREVIOUS MENU help threatened wildlife survive.
  • 14. EXIT Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. We should protect endangered animals because it is important to PREVIOUS MENU
  • 15. EXIT Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. We should protect endangered animals because it is important to PREVIOUS MENU maintain the diversity of animal life.
  • 16. EXIT Logical Fallacies Circular Reasoning An attempt to prove a statement by simply repeating it in different words is circular reasoning. This revised sentence gives a specific reason why endangered animals should be protected: to maintain the diversity of animal life. Menu PREVIOUS MENU We should protect endangered animals because it is important tomaintain the diversity of animal life.
  • 17. EXIT Logical Fallacies Continue… False Analogy A false analogy is a comparison between two things that are different in some essential way. MENU
  • 18. EXIT Logical Fallacies False Analogy A false analogy is a comparison between two things that are different in some essential way. What is wrong with this comparison? Using a computer without training is like driving a car without a license. Click to see an analysis PREVIOUS MENU
  • 19. EXIT Logical Fallacies False Analogy A false analogy is a comparison between two things that are different in some essential way. This argument compares using a computer with driving a car. The two activities do not compare in terms of the consequences of lack of training. Using a computer without training is like driving a car without a license. Menu PREVIOUS MENU
  • 20. EXIT Logical Fallacies Continue… Either/Or Reasoning An either/or fallacy is a statement suggesting that there are only two possible ways to view a situation or only two options to choose from. MENU
  • 21. EXIT Logical Fallacies Either/Or Reasoning An either/or fallacy is a statement suggesting that there are only two possible ways to view a situation or only two options to choose from. What other possibilities can you imagine for this example? Either we build a new airport, or we watch the economy of our community die. Click to see an analysis PREVIOUS MENU
  • 22. EXIT Logical Fallacies Either/Or Reasoning An either/or fallacy is a statement suggesting that there are only two possible ways to view a situation or only two options to choose from. The economy may not thrive as it would with a new airport, but it will probably not die. Either we build a new airport, or we watch the economy of our community die. Click to see a revision PREVIOUS MENU
  • 23. EXIT Logical Fallacies Either/Or Reasoning An either/or fallacy is a statement suggesting that there are only two possible ways to view a situation or only two options to choose from. Either we build a new airport, or we watch the economy of our community die. ORIGINAL Building a new airport will help our local economy grow. REVISED Menu This revision removes the limited options and presents a more reasonable statement. PREVIOUS MENU
  • 24. EXIT Logical Fallacies Continue… Single Cause In a single cause fallacy, the writer assumes that an event has just one cause when there are actually multiple causes. MENU
  • 25. EXIT Logical Fallacies Single Cause In a single cause fallacy, the writer assumes that an event has just one cause when there are actually multiple causes. Can you think of other possible reasons why the team might be terrible? Our team is terrible because our manager is terrible. Click to see a revision PREVIOUS MENU
  • 26. EXIT Logical Fallacies Single Cause In a single cause fallacy, the writer assumes that an event has just one cause when there are actually multiple causes. Our team is terrible because our manager is terrible. ORIGINAL Our team is terrible because our manager is terrible, and too many of our players lack the skills to compete in this league. REVISED Menu PREVIOUS MENU
  • 27. EXIT Logical Fallacies Continue… False Cause Just because one event occurred after another in time, the first event may not have caused the second event. Don’t let that kind of false cause reasoning show up in your writing. MENU
  • 28. EXIT Logical Fallacies False Cause Just because one event occurred after another in time, the first event may not have caused the second event. Don’t let that kind of false cause reasoning show up in your writing. Are these two events actually connected? The Continental Congress approved the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. As a result, British warships arrived to attack New York Harbor eight days later. Click to see an analysis PREVIOUS MENU
  • 29. EXIT Logical Fallacies False Cause Just because one event occurred after another in time, the first event may not have caused the second event. Don’t let that kind of false cause reasoning show up in your writing. Although it’s reasonable to assume the warships were sent in response to the Declaration of Independence, news of the event didn’t travel that fast. The ships were underway on their mission to attack New York well before July 4. The Continental Congress approved the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. As a result, British warships arrived to attack New York Harbor eight days later. Click to see a revision PREVIOUS MENU
  • 30. EXIT Logical Fallacies False Cause Just because one event occurred after another in time, the first event may not have caused the second event. Don’t let that kind of false cause reasoning show up in your writing. The Continental Congress approved the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. As a result, British warships arrived to attack New York Harbor eight days later. ORIGINAL The Continental Congress approved the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, but the British had already decided to attack New York Harbor. The warships arrived on July 12. REVISED Menu PREVIOUS MENU

Editor's Notes

  • #17: GM: I don’t see enough space between to and maintain in “to maintain the diversity . . .”
  • #20: GM: I made a text change.