Open Access Initiatives on a Regional and Global Scale: EIFL, OASPA, COAR and NDLTD
3 likes1,975 views
The document outlines the open access (OA) initiatives led by EIFL, highlighting their efforts to enable access to knowledge in over 60 developing countries through training, capacity building, and policy advocacy. It details the achievements in establishing OA journals, repositories, and awareness events, as well as examples of institutional support in countries like Uganda, Zimbabwe, and Lithuania. Additionally, it presents the roles of OASPA and COAR in promoting best practices and interoperability in OA publishing and repository management.
![The University of Nairobi OA Policy
[approved in December 2012 by the
Senate members, who supported it
overwhelmingly, and signed by the Vice
Chancellor] was a result of collaboration
between the Medical Students Association
of Kenya (MSAKE), the University of
Nairobi Library and the office of DVC
Research, Production and Extension of
the University of Nairobi
Kenya (2)](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/oacairocollaborations-140427070438-phpapp02/85/Open-Access-Initiatives-on-a-Regional-and-Global-Scale-EIFL-OASPA-COAR-and-NDLTD-15-320.jpg)
Open Access Initiatives on a Regional and Global Scale: EIFL, OASPA, COAR and NDLTD
- 1. Open Access Initiatives on a Regional and Global Scale EIFL, OASPA, COAR, NDLTD Iryna Kuchma EIFL Open Access Programme Manager Open Access Days at AUC, April 27, 2014, Cairo, Egypt
- 2. EIFL
- 4. Enabling access to knowledge in over 60 developing and transition countries
- 5. Advocate nationally and internationally for the adoption of Open Access (OA) policies and mandates Empower librarians, scholars, educators and students to be OA advocates Build capacity to set up OA journals and OA repositories Offer training, support knowledge sharing, and provide expertise EIFL-OA: in action
- 6. 55,220 people trained through our campaigns in 2013 3,400+ OA journals in EIFL partner countries 680+ OA repositories 240 awareness raising, advocacy and capacity building events in 2003-2013 47 institutions adopted OA policies 38 institutions in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe received OA advocacy grants EIFL-OA in action (2)
- 7. Armenia, Belarus, Botswana, China, Estonia, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Latvia, Lesotho, Lithuania, Malawi, Moldova, Nepal, Poland, Senegal, Serbia, Slovenia, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Ukraine & Zimbabwe 2011-2014 advocacy
- 8. Dr. Muyingo, Minister of State-Higher Education in Uganda, called upon the National Council for Higher Education and Makerere University to put in place a system that ensures that all publicly funded research becomes freely and openly available – asserting that Ugandan academia cannot afford to be left behind He encouraged researchers to publish in OA journals, and institutions to consider OA publications in promotion and tenure evaluation Uganda
- 9. The Ministry of Higher and Tertiary Education of Zimbabwe and the Zimbabwe Council of Higher Education pledged to support OA and a formulation of a national OA policy was commissioned Zimbabwe
- 10. “A guiding principle for the Makerere University College of Health Sciences (MUCHS) is to make research more relevant to the world. And it's achieved via publishing an OA journal African Health Sciences, depositing publications in OA institutional repository, digitizing dissertations and making them publicly available and addressing the question whether students’ research supports evidence informed health policies and systems in Uganda.” Prof. Nelson Sewankambo, MUCHS Principal Uganda (2)
- 11. “I will publish the results of my PhD related research in an OA repository so that everyone can benefit from it.’’ Comment of a PhD student at the University of Belgrade in a questionnaire after one of the workshops where OA was presented and explained Serbia
- 12. Dr. Vilma Petrikaitė, President of Lithuanian Society of Young Researchers: “Openness has been included in our strategic plan as the most important value – as a framework for collaboration, creativity and development” She and other young researchers now consider OA as a means to assure the quality of their research Lithuania
- 13. The Lithuanian Society of Young Researchers is an active member of the national OA Working Group that also includes representatives from the Research Council of Lithuania, the Lithuanian Science Academy, the Lithuanian Research Library Consortium, the Research & Higher Education Monitoring & Analysis Center, Agency for Science, Innovation & Technology & major universities Lithuania (2)
- 14. A team of students demonstrated OA IR to 19 Chairmen of departments at Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology OA IR became a part of the University performance contract for the year 2012- 2013 thereby ensuring that there is a commitment to achieving the stated goals Kenya
- 15. The University of Nairobi OA Policy [approved in December 2012 by the Senate members, who supported it overwhelmingly, and signed by the Vice Chancellor] was a result of collaboration between the Medical Students Association of Kenya (MSAKE), the University of Nairobi Library and the office of DVC Research, Production and Extension of the University of Nairobi Kenya (2)
- 17. “OA policy, policies on IP and plagiarism have a positive impact on the capacity and visibility of the University of Nairobi research agenda” http://ow.ly/lRKpa University of Nairobi
- 18. Tanzania
- 19. Poland
- 21. Acknowledgements The work presented would not be possible without the key contribution of the OA advocacy campaigns managers & authors of EIFL-OA case studies ( http://www.eifl.net/eifl-oa-case-studies ): Jagadish Aryal (Nepal); Dr Helena Asamoah-Hassan & Richard Bruce Lamptey (Ghana); Rania M. H. Baleela (Sudan) and Pablo de Castro, GrandIR (Spain); Bożena Bednarek-Michalska and Karolina Grodecka (Poland); Natalia Cheradi (Moldova), Agnes Chikonzo (Zimbabwe); Judith Nannozi (Uganda); Reason Baathuli Nfila (Botswana); Miriam Wanjiku Ndungu (Kenya); Rosemary Otando & Evans Njoroge (Kenya); Elena Sipria-Mironov & Merit Burenkov (Estonia); Ugis Skele (Latvia); Adam Sofronijevic (Serbia), Dr Luka Šušteršič (Slovenia); Gintarė Tautkevičienė (Lithuania); Leonid Vaitsekhovich (Belarus); Kondowani Wella (Malawi); Tetiana Yaroshenko & Oleksii Vasyliev (Ukraine); supported by the Information Programme, Open Society Foundations, & Spider, the Swedish Program for ICT in Developing Regions DSV, Department of Computer & System Sciences, Stockholm University as a part of EIFL-OA programme activities
- 22. Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) oaspa.org
- 26. 1. Peer review process: All of a journal’s content, apart from any editorial material that is clearly marked as such, shall be subjected to peer review. Peer review is defined as obtaining advice on individual manuscripts from reviewers expert in the field who are not part of the journal’s editorial staff. This process, as well as any policies related to the journal’s peer review procedures, shall be clearly described on the journal’s Web site.
- 27. 2. Governing Body: Journals shall have editorial boards or other governing bodies whose members are recognized experts in the subject areas included within the journal’s scope. The full names and affiliations of the journal’s editors shall be provided on the journal’s Web site.
- 28. 3. Editorial team/contact information Journals shall provide the full names and affiliations of the journal’s editors on the journal’s Web site as well as contact information for the editorial office.
- 29. 6. Identification of and dealing with allegations of research misconduct: Publishers and editors shall take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research misconduct has occurred, including plagiarism, citation manipulation, and data falsification/fabrication, among others. In no case shall a journal or its editors encourage such misconduct, or knowingly allow such misconduct to take place. In the event that a journal’s publisher or editors are made aware of any allegation of research misconduct relating to a published article in their journal – the publisher or editor shall follow COPE’s guidelines (or equivalent) in dealing with allegations.
- 30. 10. Conflicts of interest: A journal shall have clear policies on handling potential conflicts of interest of editors, authors, and reviewers and the policies should be clearly stated.
- 31. Confederation of Open Access Repositories (COAR) www.coar-repositories.org
- 32. Our vision A global knowledge infrastructure, built upon a network of open access digital repositories will enhance the provision, visibility and use of research outputs
- 33. Factsheet COAR e.V., a registered not-for-profit association of repository initiatives, office seat: Göttingen, DE, Host: Göttingen State and University Library Founded in Ghent, Belgium, October 21, 2009 Members & Partners: more than 100 member institutions (out of over 30 countries in Asia, Europe, Northern and Latin-America); 6 partner organizations
- 34. Activities Working Group: Repository Content Promotes emerging and best practices in content recruitment Identifies and supports the development of overlay and value-added services Publication: “Incentives, Integration, and Mediation: Sustainable Practices for Populating Repositories” (Disponible en espanol)
- 35. Activities (2) Open Access Agreements and Licenses Task Force – Monitoring, evaluating and promoting the implementation of effective open access agreements and licenses New Report: “Open Access Clauses in Publishers’ Licenses – Current State and Lessons Learned” Repository Impact and Visibility Interest Group - Explores and documents existing approaches for maximizing repository visibility and develop new strategies that can be adopted around the globe
- 36. Activities (3) Working Group: Repository Interoperability Defines and promotes interoperability, standards and infrastructure policies Interoperability Roadmap: identifies emerging issues and trends for repository interoperability and determines priorities for focusing future interoperability efforts.
- 37. Activities (4) Interest Group “Usage Data and beyond” - Collecting experiences from several projects in order to standardise the transfer protocol and data format Interest Group “Controlled Vocabulary for Repository Assets” (info:eu-repo) - Establishing workflow for vocabulary maintenance & adopting mainstream web practices for vocabulary encoding
- 38. Activities (5) Working Group: Repository and Repository Networks Support and Training Facilitates a community of professionals through a global forum for the exchange of information and experiences Collects and shares training materials developed elsewhere Produces training events: webinars, workshops, etc.
- 39. Activities (6) Joint Task Force on Librarians' Competencies in support of e-Research and Scholarly Communication – outlines the competencies needed by librarians in this evolving environment (by ARL, CARL, COAR and LIBER).
- 40. Activities (7) Aligning Repository Networks Hosted an international meeting to discuss the alignment of open access repository networks across regions. Repository Observatory To help open access repositories to anticipate and respond the constant state of rapid evolution. Identify trends and future scenarios in the context of the use of repositories in research and education
- 41. Activities (8) RDA Long Tail of Research Data Interest Group Develops a set of good practices for managing research data archived in the university context.
- 42. Benefits of joining Be part of the largest unique network worldwide related to open access repositories. Enhance your institution profile and promote your events. Get visibility of your achievements, platforms or services – globally.
- 43. Benefits of joining Stay up-to-date with future trends and current best practices. Contribute to strategic developments in the repository community. Promote the role of repositories within the broader scholarly ecosystem.
- 44. Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertation (NDLTD) www.ndltd.org