1. Performance Management 3rd Edition Aguinis
Solutions Manual download
https://testbankfan.com/product/performance-management-3rd-
edition-aguinis-solutions-manual/
Explore and download more test bank or solution manual
at testbankfan.com
2. We have selected some products that you may be interested in
Click the link to download now or visit testbankfan.com
for more options!.
Performance Management 3rd Edition Aguinis Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/performance-management-3rd-edition-
aguinis-test-bank/
Cost Management Measuring Monitoring and Motivating
Performance Canadian 2nd Edition Eldenburg Solutions
Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/cost-management-measuring-monitoring-
and-motivating-performance-canadian-2nd-edition-eldenburg-solutions-
manual/
Management Accounting Strategic Decision Making
Performance and Risk 2nd Edition Hunt Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/management-accounting-strategic-
decision-making-performance-and-risk-2nd-edition-hunt-solutions-
manual/
Fundamentals of Human Resource Management 7th Edition Noe
Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/fundamentals-of-human-resource-
management-7th-edition-noe-solutions-manual/
3. Personal Finance 5th Edition Jeff Madura Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/personal-finance-5th-edition-jeff-
madura-test-bank/
Issues in Financial Accounting 16th Edition Henderson
Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/issues-in-financial-accounting-16th-
edition-henderson-solutions-manual/
Mechanics of Materials 7th Edition Beer Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/mechanics-of-materials-7th-edition-
beer-solutions-manual/
Accounting Information Systems Global 13th Edition Romney
Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/accounting-information-systems-
global-13th-edition-romney-test-bank/
HDEV Canadian 2nd edition Rathus Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/hdev-canadian-2nd-edition-rathus-test-
bank/
5. Chapter 6—Gathering Performance Information
Learning Objectives
6.1 Understand why each of several basic components is included in the appraisal form.
6.2 Design effective appraisal forms.
6.3 Compute an overall employee performance score based on information found on the
appraisal form.
6.4 Select an appropriate time period to document performance as part of a performance
review.
6.5 Determine how many formal meetings are needed between the subordinate and the
supervisor to discuss performance issues.
6.6 Understand advantages and disadvantages of using supervisors, peers, subordinates, self,
and customers as sources of performance information.
6.7 Know how to deal with potential disagreements involved with different sources
evaluating the performance of the same employee.
6.8 Understand the psychological mechanisms leading to the inflation and deflation of
performance ratings.
6.9 Understand that the implementation of training programs can address intentional and
unintentional rating distortion.
6. Chapter Outline
Gathering Performance Information
Overview
1. Appraisal Forms
2. Characteristics of Appraisal Forms
3. Determining Overall Rating
4. Appraisal Period and Number of Meetings
5. Who Should Provide Performance Information
6. A Model of Rater Motivation
7. Preventing Rating Distortion Through Rater Training Programs
1. Appraisal Forms
• Major Components of Appraisal Forms (1)
o Basic employee information
o Accountabilities, objectives, and standards
o Competencies and indicators
o Major achievements and contributions
o Stakeholder input
o Employee comments
o Signatures
• Major Components of Appraisal Forms (2)
(These could be included in a separate form)
o Developmental achievements
o Developmental
• Needs
• Plans
• Goals
Why do some companies such as Sun Microsystems separate these components into two
separate forms?
Consider the forms in Figures 6.1 and 6.2. How complete are they? What components
might be missing?
2. Characteristics of Appraisal Forms
• Desirable Features of All Appraisal Forms
o Simplicity
o Relevancy
7. o Descriptiveness
o Adaptability
o Comprehensiveness
o Definitional clarity
o Communication
o Time orientation
Consider the forms in Figures 6.1 and 6.2. How do they measure up?
3. Determining Overall Rating
• Judgmental strategy
o Consider every aspect of performance
o Arrive at defensible summary
• Mechanical strategy
o Consider scores assigned to each section
o Add weighted scores to obtain overall score
Consider the form in Figure 6.3. Which kind of rating strategy would an employee prefer?
Why? Which would the supervisor prefer? Why?
• Comments section
o Challenges
• Difficult to systematically categorize and analyze
• Quality, length, and content vary
o Tools to overcome challenges
• Computer-aided text analysis (CATA) software
• Establish goals of the information provided
• Training in systematic and standardized rating skills
4. Appraisal Period and Number of Meetings
• Appraisal period
o Meetings
▪ Annual
• May not provide sufficient opportunity for supervisor/employee discussion
▪ Semi-annual
What is the benefit to Hamilton Standard Commercial Aircraft in performing semi-annual
reviews?
▪ Quarterly
Why does Synygy, Inc. perform quarterly reviews?
• Review to be completed
o Anniversary date
8. ▪ The supervisor does not have to fill out forms at the same time
▪ Cannot tie rewards to fiscal year
o Fiscal year
▪ Rewards tied to fiscal year
▪ Goals tied to corporate goals
▪ May be a burden to the supervisor, depending on the implementation
• Six Types of Formal Meetings (can be combined)
o System inauguration
o Self-appraisal
o Classical performance review
o Merit/salary review
o Development plan
o Objective setting
How does Johnsonville Foods handle these meetings?
How might a Web-based system such as the one at Central Florida Healthcare Federal
Credit Union be used to enhance the usefulness of these meetings?
5. Who Should Provide Performance Information?
Employees should be involved in selecting
• Which sources evaluate
• Which performance dimensions
When employees are actively involved
• Higher acceptance of results
• Perception that the system is fair
Firsthand knowledge of employee performance
• Supervisors
• Peers
• Subordinates
• Self
• Customers
o Supervisors
• Advantages
▪ Best position to evaluate performance vs. strategic goals
▪ Make decisions about rewards
▪ Able to differentiate among performance dimensions
▪ Viewed as the exclusive source in some cultural contexts
9. • Disadvantages
▪ Supervisor may not be able to directly observe performance
▪ Evaluations may be biased
o Peers
• Advantages
▪ Assess teamwork
• Disadvantages
▪ Possible friendship bias
▪ May be less discriminating
▪ Context effects
o Subordinates
• Advantages
▪ Accurate when used for developmental purposes
▪ Good position to assess some competencies
• Disadvantages
▪ Inflated when used for administrative purposes
▪ May fear retaliation (confidentiality is key)
How is “Tell Dell” used to improve the computer giant?
o Self
• Advantages
▪ Increased acceptance of decisions
▪ Decreased defensiveness during an appraisal interview
▪ Good position to track activities during review period
• Disadvantages
▪ May be more lenient and biased
• Suggestions to improve the quality of self-appraisals
▪ Use comparative as opposed to absolute measurement systems
▪ Allow employees to practice their self-rating skills
▪ Assure confidentiality
o Emphasize the futureCustomers (external and internal)
• Advantages
▪ Employees become more focused on meeting customer expectations
• Disadvantages
▪ Time
▪ Money
What advantages could override the disadvantages of using customer evaluations?
10. Disagreement Across Sources
• Expect disagreements
• Ensure employee receives feedback by the sources
• Assign differential weights to scores by source, depending on importance
• Ensure that employees take active roles in selecting which sources will rate which
dimensions
6. A Model of Rater Motivation (see the textbook for model)
• Types of Rating Errors
o Intentional errors
• Rating inflation
• Rating deflation
o Unintentional errors
• Due to complexity of tasks
• Motivations for Rating Inflation
o Maximize merit raise/rewards
o Encourage employees
o Avoid creating written records
o Avoid confrontation with employees
o Promote undesired employees out of the unit
o Make the manager look good to his/her supervisor
• Motivations for Rating Deflation
o Shock employees
o Teach a rebellious employee a lesson
o Send a message to employee that he/she should consider leaving
o Build a strongly documented and written record of poor performance
• Recommendations for reducing intentional rating distortion
o Have raters justify their ratings
o Have raters justify their ratings in a face-to-face meeting
7. Preventing Rating Distortion Through Rater Training Programs
Rater training programs should cover:
• Information—how the system works
o Reasons for implementing the performance management system
o Information on the appraisal form and system mechanics
• Motivation—what’s in it for me?
o Benefits of providing accurate ratings
o Tools for providing accurate ratings
11. • Identifying, observing, recording, and evaluating performance
o How to identify and rank job activities
o How to observe, record, and measure performance
o How to minimize rating errors
• How to interact with employees when they receive performance information
o How to conduct an appraisal interview
o How to train, counsel, and coach
What aspects of a good rater training program are covered in the City of Aurora, CO training
program? How could the program be improved?
Gathering Performance Information: Summary
• Appraisal Forms
• Characteristics of Appraisal Forms
• Determining Overall Rating
• Appraisal Period and Number of Meetings
• Who Should Provide Performance Information?
• A Model of Rater Motivation
• Preventing Rating Distortion Through Rater Training Programs
Review Learning Objectives
Worked Solutions for End-of-Chapter Cases
Case Study 6.1: Evaluating an Appraisal Form Used in Higher Education
Major Components of Appraisal
Forms Comments
X
Basic Employee Information
No changes are needed because more than a
sufficient amount of information is included.
Accountabilities, Objectives,
and Standards
These need to be linked to the department and
organizational mission. If they do not do this, the
employees may not realize how their contribution
fits into the organization as a whole. To
accomplish this linkage, the form should at least
provide a brief outline of the goals of the
organization or department.
X
Competencies and Indicators
No changes are needed. There are ten essential
core competencies (each includes specific
descriptions) and room for additional essential
competencies are provided for rating. Further, set
indicators are provided along with clear guidelines
that guide the evaluator in making evaluations that
are uniform across employees.
12. Major Components of Appraisal
Forms Comments
Major Achievements and
Contributions
Employees like to be recognized for their hard
work, so having a section that reminds the
manager to focus on the positives would be
helpful. This is included in the evaluation form to
the extent that the employee is evaluated on
whether or not last period’s goals were met. It
would be beneficial to also include an area where
the evaluator could include other major
achievements or contributions other than met
goals.
Developmental Achievements
This section is not present. In the absence of this
section, the negative consequence is that the rated
employees may feel that their efforts to improve
their skills are going unnoticed. This may lead to
reduced motivation.
X
Developmental Needs, Plans,
and Goals Presen`
X
Stakeholder Input
A section for supervisor’s comments is attached.
However, nothing comparable exists in the form
for other stakeholders (e.g., peers, customers).
X
Employee Comments
There is no are available for the employee.
Without this the employee does not have the
opportunity to participate in the evaluation
process, which may cause the employee to
perceive that the evaluation system is not fair,
X Approvals Present and no changes are needed.
(Suggested points: 5, [6.1])
Case Study 6.2: Judgmental and Mechanical Methods of Assigning Overall Performance
Score at The Daily Planet
There are several ways to compute the overall score using the judgmental method based on the
relative importance that raters give to each of the performance dimensions rated. But, assuming a
rater gives the same weight to each of the dimensions, the overall score would be: (2 + 4 + 5 +
2)/4 = 4.25.
Using the assigned weights, the overall performance score is 2(.25) + 4(.40) + 5(.15) + 2(.20) =
3.25. Therefore, using a mechanical method resulted in a score that is 1 point higher than using a
judgmental method. This is a very large difference considering that scores can range from 0 to 5.
As shown by the difference in scores, there is a large difference in the two ratings. This could
have implications for how bonuses are allocated, promotions are rewarded, and goals are set.
Using the judgmental method, the overall score was much lower; this means that the
organization possibly had to pay less bonuses. However, the impact on the individual could be
13. detrimental to his/her career if that person is being passed over for promotions or is setting goals
that are too easy to achieve. This could affect the supervisor who might begin to set
inappropriate goals for the employee.
(Suggested points: 5, [6.3])
Case Study 6.3: Minimizing Intentional and Unintentional Rating Errors
Note: “IE” and “UE” stand for intentional errors and unintentional errors, respectively.
IE UE Content Area Comments
X
Reasons for implementing the
performance management
system. This includes an
overview of the entire system,
its purpose, and benefits for all
employees.
This type of information will help raters realize
that their ratings are taken seriously so that they
should take them seriously. This includes
explaining what the ratings can be used for and
the importance of the accuracy of the ratings.
Thus, it should enhance raters’ motivation to
provide accurate ratings. However, this type of
information would not necessarily diminish
unintentional errors.
X
How to identify and rank job
activities. This includes
information on how to conduct
a job analysis and understand
the most important
accountabilities and
competencies.
This mainly helps prevent unintentional errors.
Raters gain a better understanding of the
important job activities and are therefore more
likely to evaluate behaviors and results
correctly.
X
How to observe, record, and
measure performance. This
may include observational
skills such as how to observe
the behaviors that really matter
and not be distracted by
behaviors unrelated to the
performance dimensions being
measured. It also includes
skills needed to fill out the
appraisal form.
This will help avoid unintentional errors
because it teaches one to record performance—
a habit that can decrease many of the cognitive
processing errors often present.
X X
Information on the appraisal
form and system mechanics.
This includes a detailed
description of the content of
the appraisal form and what
each section is intended to
measure. It also includes
information on a number of
This type of information is likely to decrease
both types of errors. First, intentional errors are
likely to be decreased because the manager will
become more comfortable with the process.
Second, it can also help decrease unintentional
errors because managers will gain a better
understanding of the different levels of
performance.
14. IE UE Content Area Comments
meetings and the expectations
regarding each participant.
X
How to minimize rating errors.
This includes steps that can be
taken to minimize
unintentional errors due to the
cognitive demands associated
with the observation and
evaluation of performance.
This targets unintentional errors and should
help minimize them.
X X
How to conduct an appraisal
interview. This includes
listening skills, communication
skills, and how to provide
feedback during the appraisal
interview. It also includes
skills on how to help the
employee create a
developmental plan.
This addresses both types of errors. First, it
addresses intentional errors because the
manager has good skills regarding how to
manage the process. Second, it helps managers
verbalize the reasons for the rating they
provided, thereby helping ratings be more
accurate, because it is difficult to justify
inaccurate ratings.
X
How to train, counsel, and
coach. This includes skills that
the supervisor needs to help
employees improve their
performance on an ongoing
basis.
This mainly addresses intentional errors
because it gives managers skills on how to
manage the process well and can decrease the
motivation to introduce politics into the
process.
(Suggested points: 5, [6.1])
Case Study 6.4: Minimizing Biases in Performance Evaluation at Expert Engineering, Inc.
1. It is possible that Demetri may intentionally inflate the ratings he gives to his fellow alumni
because he doesn’t want to confront them about areas where performance improvement is
necessary. He may worry that giving an accurate rating could jeopardize his relationship with
the “gang” whom he likes and wishes to continue to be part of. At the same time, he may
unintentionally distort the ratings that he gives to various employees, because he, as a
principal, is responsible for supervision of many engineers. It is very difficult to remember
all of the behavior and results of one’s own performance, let alone such information about
many different people. Observing information about performance, storing this information in
memory, and then recalling it when it’s time to fill out the appraisal form is a complex
cognitive task that could lead to unintentional distortions of ratings.
(Suggested points: 5, [6.8])
16. 2. Different kinds of training could assist Demetri in providing more objective appraisals,
although none of the programs can guarantee perfect results. Appraisals are inherently
subjective. The training program should provide basic information on the appraisal form and
how the system works. In addition, the benefits of accurate appraisals (“what’s in it for me?”)
and tools for providing such ratings should be provided. Demetri will need training in the
following areas:
o How to identify and rank job activities
o How to observe, record, and measure performance
o How to minimize rating errors
Finally, he will need assistance in how to interact with the engineers he supervises,
particularly when they receive performance information. Demetri needs to learn how to
conduct an appraisal interview and how to train, counsel, and coach. Training should help him
provide the supervision and performance appraisal that all of his employees need, including
the members of his alma mater.
(Suggested points: 5, [6.9])
Additional Cases and Worked Solutions
Case Study: CRB, Inc.
The following performance appraisal form was adopted by CRB, Inc., a small car restoration
business. It was filled out by Al Brown, the owner of CRB, Inc., because he has been told he
should give all of his employees an appraisal of their performance. This particular form was
given to the foreman, Robert (Bob) Jared, to complete the employee comments; Al then filled in
the supervisor comments sections.
As you review the performance appraisal form, please respond to the following questions:
1. Provide a detailed evaluation of the form. What components are necessary? What is
missing and what should be added? Is anything optional? Provide a brief explanation of
your responses.
(Suggested points: 10, .7[6.1], .3[6.2])
2. Assess the advantages and disadvantages of having the supervisor and the subordinate
complete this form.
(Suggested points: 5, [6.6])
3. Based on the information provided, what is an appropriate overall success rating for this
employee? Why?
(Suggested points: 5, [6.3])
4. How often should this form be completed and why?
(Suggested points: 3, [6.4])
17. Performance Appraisal Form1
Employee Name: Position/Title: Department: Date:
Robert Jared Foreman Paint and Auto body 6/30/12
Performance Attribute
Supervisor
Comments
Score Employee
Comments
Score
Knowledge/Know-how:
Demonstrated knowledge or
technical skills required by
position. These may include
command of professional body of
knowledge; knowledge of
organizational structure, mission,
or goals.
Strong knowledge and
technical skill.
Instinctive knowledge
of how the company can
move forward in the
industry.
3
I’ve got 25 years
experience in paint
and body shop work.
I held this company
together over the past
year.
4
Communication Skills:
Demonstrated written, listening,
and interpersonal skills. These
may include diplomacy, conflict
resolution, or presentation skills.
Good verbal skills most
of the time. Occasional
difficulty in controlling
anger has exacerbated
existing problems.
Doesn’t always do
paperwork needed in
job.
1
Good enough for this
job. Frustrations
aren’t my fault. I do
my best.
2
Work Results:
Work is thorough, accurate,
completed on time and as
planned, and is considered a
quality job.
Excellent
4
Of course.
4
Work Style:
Demonstrated good work habits.
These may include being
dependable, consistent,
independent and self-starting, and
exhibiting flexible work behavior. Excellent
4
I’m always here
before my boss and
open to whatever he
suggests. I work
weekends and do
work for free. This
entire place is a lot
cleaner and more
organized since I got
here.
4
Service Orientation:
Demonstrated courteous,
responsive, respectful behavior
toward customers, staff, and
In general, Bob does a
good job managing
relationships with
customers and staff. As
1.5 I do the best I can in
difficult
circumstances.
3
1
Adapted from an appraisal form developed by Boston College, found at
http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/hvp/c/apprais.html Accessed May 4, 2005.
18. Employee Name: Position/Title: Department: Date:
Robert Jared Foreman Paint and Auto body 6/30/12
Performance Attribute
Supervisor
Comments
Score Employee
Comments
Score
others. noted above, he needs
help managing anger
issues.
Additional Performance
Attributes:
Supervision
Contribution to overall
motivation and
performance of staff is
very good.
3
I’ve trained Dave and
brought the mechanic
and engine repair
shop into being on
my own time.
4
Overall Success Rating
Very good
2.5
Top notch
5
This performance appraisal is meant to summarize and evaluate an individual’s overall
performance for the year. Five generic performance attributes and definitions are provided for all
employees. These attributes address an individual’s knowledge, competence, and skills as
applied to one’s work. Performance attributes may be added as needed in order to customize the
form to the individual’s position. Both the supervisor and the employee should provide an
overall performance success rating using the scale below.
4—Performance far exceeds position requirements and indicates job mastery
3—Performance consistently exceeds position requirements
2—Performance meets position requirements
1—Performance does not meet position requirements
Did the employee have a work plan? Yes N
No
o
Did this employee show progress on a work plan? Yes No
Did the employee have a developmental plan? Yes N
No
o
Did this employee show progress on a developmental plan? Yes No
Supervisor Comments: (Describe the employee’s total performance for the year and substantiate
the overall success rating.)
Bob has really helped the shop get into a competitive stance. Both his own performance and his supervision have
helped us get cars out on schedule and keep good employees. He works hard while he’s here and he encourages
the rest of the staff to put in a good day’s work for a good day’s pay. He volunteers his own time and ideas to
enhance the shop. He suggested working with a radio station to refinish a car that they could give away in
exchange for providing advertising for the shop. His enthusiasm led the employees to volunteer their time on the
19. project. Everything is more organized since he got here. On the other hand, he really does need to learn how
to manage his anger. It doesn’t happen very often (maybe four times all year), but it’s frightening to watch
him lose his temper. So far there has been no violence (which would be a firing offense), but I can understand
why one customer brought in a police officer when he came back to pay his bill after Bob got angry when the
customer called him a liar. Bob’s loud angry verbal response was totally inappropriate for a business setting.
Paperwork is another area of weakness: Bob does as little as he can get away with, which leads to poor
documentation in the customer files and problems with employee pay sheets. He complained to one owner about how
the other owner didn’t purchase parts on time. That owner asked in writing for a list of parts needed to monitor
their purchase and the list still has not appeared.
Supervisor’s Signature: Alfred E. Brown Date:June 28, 2012
Employee Comments: (Describe your total performance and the two-way communication with
your supervisor throughout the year.)
I never had a work plan and don’t know what a developmental plan is. Al hired me to get this
shop back on its feet and I’ve done that. For the first time, he’s taking money home and he
has me to thank for that. Sure, I get frustrated—who wouldn’t with customers who want us to
work for free and whine that the former owner promised them this and that. Of course, he
never did anything and now we’re stuck with his broken promises and no paperwork. I do my
best with the paperwork but I get busy on the jobs. You’ve got to decide whether you want paper
or cars to go out. Al and I talk every day—I give him notes about the parts I need. Then Mary
says she wants a list … tell her to ask Al! I don’t have time to please a boss who’s never in the
shop. I’ve got too much going on with doing free and redo work and helping our employees be
great employees. It’s nice to work here most of the time. I’ve always liked working on old cars
and we do great work. The money is starting to be ok and we’re getting better equipment. We
ought to get this place really turned around this next year.
Employee’s Signature: Bob Jared Date: June 28, 2012
Answers:
1. Most forms include a combination of the following: (a) basic employee information, (b)
accountabilities, objectives, and standards, (c) competencies and indicators, (d) major
achievements and contributions, (e) developmental achievements, (f) developmental
needs, plans, and goals, (g) stakeholder input, (h) employee comments, and (i) signatures.
Note, however, that one size does not fit all, and different components are appropriate
based on the purposes of the appraisal.
This appraisal is described in the case study as perhaps the first formal appraisal that Al
Brown has done with his employees. It may be a fiscal year end appraisal or a six month
20. appraisal. Although the employee’s name, position, and department are provided, there is
no further basic employee information. Some performance attributes appear to relate to
competencies (knowledge, communication skills); some appear to be performance
standards (results, style, service orientation). The supervisor and employee comments
highlight several major achievements and contributions. The supervisor notes some
developmental needs (anger management; more consistent paperwork completion) but
there is no plan or goal to deal with these needs. There is no stakeholder input. There are
employee comments and signatures.
2. The supervisor is usually in the best position to evaluate performance in light of the
organizational goals. As the owner, Al is certainly responsible for making decisions about
any rewards associated with performance evaluation. A disadvantage is that evaluations
can be biased; some supervisors may not be able to directly observe performance.
When the employee completes the form, advantages can include increased acceptance of
decisions and decreased defensiveness during the appraisal interview. The employee is in
a very good position to track his own activities during the review period. Disadvantages
may include rating distortions such as leniency with regard to his own behaviors as well
as other intentional and unintentional biases.
3. Al and Bob agree that Bob provides strong value to the company, although Al is aware
that Bob has, on occasion, jeopardized the company with his inability to control his
anger. Bob believes that he consistently exceeds the position requirements and some of
the descriptions of his performance indicate that he has been a very valuable asset to the
company. Al notes some weaknesses that indicate “consistency” is missing; in fact,
occasional performance does not meet minimum requirements. Al’s overall rating of 2.5
may be the most objective rating.
4. At a minimum, a formal appraisal should be conducted annually. However, it would be
better to conduct formal appraisals at least semi-annually, and quarterly would be the
best. This is a busy shop, and both Al and Bob are working as supervisors with many
other duties besides supervision. They cannot count on providing equally complete and
balanced feedback to each employee on an ongoing basis. Therefore, regular formal
meetings conducted with advance thought and preparation have a much better chance of
helping each employee do his best to help the company meet its goals.
Case Study: Our Civil Service
At the State Employment Service, a number of employment counselors were hired together
during a special recruiting effort 12 years ago in 2000. They formed a cohort, went through
training together, and received graduate hours in vocational counseling together.
About a year ago, Jane Midland, the first member of the cohort to get promoted, tested into a
supervisory position at one of the Job Service Centers. Two of the eleven employees who report
to her are members of the 2000 cohort. Barb Rick and George Malloy deeply respect her abilities
and have a strong affection for her. In fact, Barb Rick has spent time at Jane’s home watching
22. who considers those Kinds of Fevers which are most commonly
epidemical in wood-land Countries.
S U C H Drugs however as are from a vegetable Production, and
abound with subtile, volatile Parts, are of Service to be exhaled into
the Air this way, both by their Fitness to join with, and cover those
venomous Spicula that are on float; and to mix with the Animal
Fluids by Respiration and Insinuation into the Pores, whereby they
convey, as it were, an Antidote, wheresoever the Poison is able to
penetrate, and which grosser Vapours can by no means do.
O F this kind are chiefly Storax, Benjamin, Frankincense, and all
the Aromatick Roots and Woods; and amongst them all, I cannot
think the Smell of Tar, Pitch, &c. is inferior in any Respects, where its
Scent is not particularly offensive. And these Things should be burnt
at such Distances of Time from each other, that the Air may be
always sensibly impregnated with them.
B U T as some have sad Apprehensions from the Air being still,
and as it were stagnant at such Times, and not without good
Reason, as it favours the Collection of poisonous Effluvia, and
aggravates an Infection; for the Prevention of which, it is proposed
at certain Intervals to fire off great Guns, and the like: I cannot but
imagine, that for this End, it would be much more effectual to let off
small Parcels of the common Pulvis Fulminans, in such Openings of a
large Town, as Squares and Market-Places; for whosoever hath been
accustomed to any Experiments with this Composition, must have
perceived a much greater Shock given to the Air by its Explosion,
than by the largest Pieces of Ordnance; insomuch that if any
Objection can lie against the Practice of this in London, should there
be Occasion, it is the crasie Condition of the City Buildings, which
perhaps may not well stand its Shocks, were they to be made with
good Quantities of it at a time.
T H E Matter likewise of this Composition in some Measure
bespeaks its Usefulness for these Purposes on other Accounts,
23. besides its Elastick Force, because it diffuses into the Air great
Quantities of that nitrous Salt, which is known to add much to its
Serviceableness in Life: And whosoever considers how much cheaper
this is to be procured, and how much easier practised than the firing
off Guns, especially in the Middle of great Towns, cannot but be
desirous to try it, in Case of such Calamities as are now with too
much Reason feared; it may not therefore be unacceptable to give
its Composition here.
℞ Sal. Nitri Partes iij. Sal. Tartari P. ij. Sulphuris P. j. optime
misceantur in Mortario, parùm tepefacto, & servetur ad usuum vase
bene obturato.
T H I S is order’d in a warm Mortar, and to be kept close,
because the Salt of Tartar is apt to imbibe a Moisture from the Air,
which hinders its Explosion. A Drachm or two put in as close a Heap
as possible upon an Iron Plate over any Fire, will in a little Time go
off with a Report and Concussion beyond that of any Gun
whatsoever; so that in a calm Season, and an infected Air, great
Services may undoubtedly be had from its frequent Practice.
A S to the curative Part in such a terrible Visitation, it cannot be
expected that Rules can be given suitable to every one’s Case but by
such as attend upon them; and the most that can be in general laid
down to this Purpose, may be collected from the preceding Treatise
of Dr. Hodges. Although as to the Choice of Alexipharmicks, they are
certainly best that are most subtile, and capable of being carried by
the Course of Circulation into the finest Recesses of the Constitution,
whereinto it is manifest the extream Subtilty of the pestilential
Poison is capable to enter: And amongst all of this Class, I take
Camphire to be much the more preferable; which therefore I would
propose not only to be repeated in proper Doses to an infected
Person, till a due Crisis is obtained, but also now and then given to
those who are well, by way of Prevention. And because some
Persons, notwithstanding what has been before said, will be pleased
24. with some general Formulæ to these Purposes, the following are
offered to be complied with, or varied, at every one’s Discretion, who
is a Judge of such Matters.
℞ Conserv. Rutæ, Flor. Rorismar. ana ℥ j. Species diambræ sine
odoratis ʒ j. Balsam. è Mechâ ʒ [ss.] pulv. Croci angl. ℈ j. Syr.
Balsam. q. s. ut F. Electuarium, cujus sum. quantitatem N. M. omni
mane, & horâ somni superbibendo Haustulum Vini albi Lisbonensis,
vel Hispanici, tepefacti. To the Night Dose of this, may be added
sometimes 2 or 3 Grains of Camphire, especially if a Person feels any
Indisposition that requires a breathing Sweat, some may perhaps
like the following better.
℞ Cons. Rutæ ℥ j. Mithrid. ℥ [ss.] Pulv. Fol. Scordij ʒ j. rad.
Contrayerv. Serpentarij Virgin. ana ʒ [ss.] Sal. volat. Viperar. Croci
angl. ana ℈ j. Syr. Balsam. q. s. ut f. Elect. sumend. codem modo.
25. Or,
℞ Confect. Tracastorij sine Melle, Mithrid. ana ℥ [ss.] Boli veri,
Terræ Japon. ana ʒ j. Castor. Salis succin. Croci angl. ana ℈ j.
Confect. Alkerm. sine odoratis q. s. ut F. Electuarium ad usum
prædictum, precipue h. somni.
B E S I D E S a precautionary Use of these with proper Diluters,
and under the Direction of those who are Judges; some Security
may possibly be had from odoriferous Substances to smell to,
especially at a Time of conversing with the infected; for which
Purpose I know of nothing so grateful and efficacious, as the Volatile
Sal Armoniac, well impregnated with the essential Oils of Aromatick
Ingredients, and as it is to be procured dry, to be kept in small
Bottles, from a careful Distillation of the common Sal Volatile
Oleosum. But if in any Cases more fetid Substances are preferable,
Compositions may be easily made of such from Rue, Featherfew,
Galbanum, Assa-fætida, and the like; for these, with some Persons
agree better than more grateful Scents.
FREQUENTLY to dissolve in the Mouth the following Lozenges,
or something like them, I also imagine may be of Service; especially
to those who are conversant in infected Places.
℞ Boli veri opt. ℥ j. Terræ Japon. ʒ ij. Coral. rub. Margarit. opt.
levigat. Flor. Benz. ana ʒ j. [ss.] ol. Cinnam. gut. xij. Sacchar. albis.
lib. j. Mucelag. Gum. Tragacanth. in aq. Rosar. Dam. q. s. form. in
Troch. ad usum prædictum. For those who like it, may be added
some Ambergrease; enough to give a light Scent of it.
P R E S E R V AT O R Y Evacuations of all kinds are much
disputed in these Cases, and not worth our particular Regard in this
Place; for thus much is plain to all who are competent Judges in
such Matters, that but very few Circumstances can justifie them;
because every Evacuation, unless that of Perspiration, gives more
Liberty for any Thing noxious without, to insinuate into the Pores, as
26. there is made thereby less Resistance to its Admission; not to say
any Thing of the Danger in such a Practice, by lessening at the same
Time the Quantities of Spirits and Strength, which cannot but be
mischievous: And particularly ought all Persons at such Times to
avoid too lax a Temper of Body; for which Purpose, these
preservatory Means just hinted at, mostly tend to astringe the
Bowels, and increase Perspiration.
F I N I S .
27. A Table of the Funerals
IN THE
Several Parishes within the Bills of
Mortality
of the City of L O N D O N ,
For the Year 1665.
No. of
Funerals
Plag.
ST. Albans Woodstreet 200 121
St. Alhallows Barkin 514 330
St. Alhallows Bread-street 35 16
St. Alhallows the Great 455 426
St. Alhallows Honey-lane 10 5
St. Alhallows the Less 239 175
St. Alhallows Lombardstreet 90 62
St. Alhallows Staining 185 112
St. Alhallows the Wall 500 356
St. Alphage 271 115
28. St. Andrew Hubbard 71 25
St. Andrew Undershaft 274 189
St. Andrew Wardrobe 476 308
St. Anne Aldersgate 282 197
St. Anne Black-Friers 652 467
St. Antholins 58 35
St. Austins 43 20
St. Bartholomew Exchange 73 51
St. Bennet Finch 47 22
St. Bennet Grace-church 57 41
St. Bennet Pauls Wharf 355 172
St. Bennet Sherehog 11 1
St. Botolph Billinsgate 83 50
Christ Church 653 467
St. Christophers 60 47
St. Clements Eastcheap 38 20
St. Dionys Back-church 78 27
St. Dunstans in the East 265 150
St. Edmunds Lombardstreet 70 36
St. Ethelborough 195 106
St. Faiths 104 70
St. Fosters 144 105
St. Gabriel Fenchurch 69 39
St. George Botolph-lane 41 27
St. Gregories by Pauls 376 232
St. Helens 108 75
St. James Dukes-place 262 190
St. James Garlickhith 189 118
St. John Baptist Walbrook 138 83
St. John Evangelist 9
St. John Zachary 85 54
St. Katherine Coleman-street 299 213
29. St. Katherine Cree-church 335 201
St. Lawrence Jewry 94 48
St. Lawrence Pountney 214 140
St. Leonard Eastcheap 42 27
St. Leonard Foster-lane 335 255
St. Magnus 103 30
St. Margaret Lothbury 100 66
St. Margaret Moses 38 25
St. Margaret New Fishstreet 114 66
St. Margaret Pattons 49 24
Sr. Mary Abchurch 99 54
St. Mary Aldermanbury 181 109
St. Mary Aldermary 105 75
St. Mary-le-Bow 64 36
St. Mary Bothaw 55 30
St. Mary Colechurch 17 6
St. Mary Hill 94 64
St. Mary Mounthaw 56 37
St. Mary Somerset 342 262
St. Mary Stainings 47 27
St. Mary Woolchurch 65 33
St. Mary Woolnoth 75 38
St. Martins Ironmonger-lane 21 11
St. Martins Ludgate 196 128
St. Martins Orgars 110 71
St. Martins Outwich 60 34
St. Martins Vintrey 417 349
St. Matthew Friday-street 24 6
St. Maudlins Milk-street 44 22
St. Maudlins Old Fish-street 176 121
St. Michael Bassishaw 253 164
St. Michael Cornhil 104 52
30. St. Michael Crooked-lane 179 133
St. Michael Queenhith 203 122
St. Michael Quern 44 18
St. Michael Royal 152 116
St. Michael Woodstreet 122 62
St. Mildred Bread-street 59 26
St. Mildred Poultrey 68 46
St. Nicholas Acons 46 28
St. Nicholas Coleabby 125 91
St. Nicholas Olaves 90 62
St. Olaves Hart-street 237 160
St. Olaves Jewry 54 32
St. Olaves Silver-street 250 132
St. Pancras Soper-lane 30 15
St. Olaves Jewry 54 32
St. Olaves Silver-street 250 132
St. Pancras Soper-lane 30 15
St. Peters Cheap 61 35
St. Peters Cornhil 136 76
St. Peters Pauls Wharf 114 86
St. Peters Poor 79 47
St. Stephens Coleman-street 560 391
St. Stephens Walbrook 34 17
St. Swithins 93 56
St. Thomas Apostle 163 110
Trinity Parish 115 79
In the 97 Parishes within the Walls, Total of the Funerals
15207; Died of the Plague 9887.
31. St. Andrew Holborn 39583103
St. Bartholomew the Great 493 344
St. Bartholomew the Less 193 139
St. Bridget 21111427
Bridewel Precinct 230 179
St. Botolph Aldersgate 997 755
St. Botolph Aldgate 49264051
St. Botolph Bishopsgate 34642500
St. Dunstans in the West 958 665
St. George Southwark 16131260
St. Giles Cripplegate 80694838
St. Olaves Southwark 47932785
St. Saviours Southwark 42353446
St. Sepulchres 45092746
St. Thomas Southwark 475 371
Trinity Minories 168 123
At the Pesthouse 159 156
In the 16 Parishes without the Walls, Total of the Funerals
41351; Died of the Plague 28888.
St. Giles in the Fields 44573216
Hackney Parish 232 132
St. James Clerkenwel 18631377
St. Katherines Tower 956 601
Lambeth Parish 798 537
St. Leonards Shoreditch 26691949
St. Magdalens Bermondsey19431363
St. Mary Newington 12721004
32. St. Mary Islington 696 593
St. Mary Whitechappel 47663855
Rotherhith Parish 304 210
Stepney Parish 85986583
In the 12 Parishes in the outer Parts, Total of the Funerals
28554; Died of the Plague 21420.
St. Clements Danes 19691319
St. Paul Covent Garden 408 261
St. Martins in the Fields 48042883
St. Mary Savoy 303 198
St. Margarets Westminster47103742
Whereof at the Pesthouse — 156
In the 5 Parishes of the City and Liberties of Westminster,
Total of the Funerals 12194; Died of the Plague 8403.
Total of the Funerals — 97306.
Died of the Plague — 68596.
Besides many, of which no Account was given by the Parish-Clerks,
and who were privately Buried.
33. FOOTNOTES:
[1] De Bello Punico.
[2] Lib. 10. Cap. 3.
[3] Tom. 1. memorab. Cent. 10.
[4] In his Scholium upon Obs. 9. Lib. 6.
[5] De Peste, Lib. 6.
[6] De Peste, Lib. 1.
[7] Præf. de Imperio Solis ac Lunæ, &c.
[8] Lib. 8. Segon. 70.
[9] Nat. Hist. of Oxfordshire, Chap. 2.
[10] De Medicin. Egypt. Lib. 1. Cap. 15.
[11] Hist. India and Brasil.
[12] De Bello Judaico, Lib. 7. Cap. 26.
[13] De Bello Civili, Lib. 2.
[14] Lib. 6. Obser. 9. and 26.
[15] Lib 1. de differ. Feb. Cap. 3. & de cibis mali & boni succi.
[16] Comment, in Lib. de natalium, text. 4.
[17] Dissert. de Peste.
[18] De montis Vesuvii Incendio.
[19] Hist. 73.
34. [20] Nat. Hist. of Oxfordshire, Chap. 3. Par. 31.
[21] Nat. Hist. Cap. 18. Sect. 4.
[22] No. 3.
[23] Vid. Epidem. and de Aere, Aquis & Locis.
[24] Vid. Comment. in Epidem. Hippocrates.
[25] Hist. Ind. & Brasil.
[26] Probl. 1.
[27] Lib. 1. Decad. 4.
[28] Lib. 15. Cap. 10.
[29] Epidem. Lib. 2 & 3. de Aere Aquis & Locis. Aph. 11.
Sect. 3.
[30] Comment. in Epidem. Lib. 3. de differ. Febr. Cap. 4. de
Temperam Lib. 1. Cap. 4.
[31] Vid. Purchas Pilgr. Lib. 6. C. 1. as also Joan. Les Hist.
Afric. Lib. 1. Cap. 1.
[32] Medicina Statica. Sect. 2. Aph. 18.
[33] Ibid. Aph. 6, and 29.
[34] Lib. 3. Epidem.
[35] De Abdit. Lib. 2. Cap. 12.
[36] Ibid.
[37] De Febr. purp. Cap. 2.
[38] Lib. 5. decad.
[39] De Antris Lethiferis, Art. 2.
[40] Loco cit.
[41] Ovid. Met. m. lib. 7.
[42] De morbis contag. lib. 2. cap. 7.
[43] De Bello Illyrico.
35. [44] De Medic. Egypt.
TRANSCRIBER’S AMENDMENTS
Transcriber’s Note: The Table of Contents was added. Blank
pages have been deleted. The illustrations may have been moved.
The first illustration, consisting of part of the original title page, has
been added. Footnotes have been moved to immediately above this
note. When the author’s preference could be determined, we have
rendered consistent on a per-word-pair basis the hyphenation or
spacing of such pairs when repeated in the same grammatical
context. The publisher’s inadvertent omissions of important
punctuation have been corrected. The publisher’s inconsistent
application of gesperrt letter spacing has been retained.
The following list indicates any additional changes. The page
number represents that of the original publication and applies in this
etext except for footnotes and illustrations since they may have been
moved.
Page Change
4 whose Spirits being manifesty[manifestly] sunk
30 from the most irrefrigable[irrefragable] Authority,
67 and their Restautation[Restauration], Confirmation, and
Vigour,
67 in a very particlar[particular] Manner,
91 Coats, being endewed[endowed] with an exquisite Sense,
107 and by whose colliquitive[colliquative] Quality
108 Some cotinued[continued] in a Profusion of Sweat
116 its Origin was from the Arteral[Arterial] and Venal
Fluids;
117 where they of themselves chrvstallize,[chrystallize] by
36. Means
127 and killed her in a[delete] about three Days
133 as the Cofiguration[Configuration] of Vessels
138 went no further than the Skin, would oftentimes
shough[slough] off
146 the Case if likewise noc[not] much better when
147 likewise brings on a dangerous
Colliquitation[Colliquatation],
152 Chapter VI[VII]
152 a pestilential Infection is extreamely[extreamly]
dangerous,
156 for if the other Sumptoms[Symptoms] do not remit
158 Meadow-sweet, Butter-Burr[Butterbur], &c.
168 Decoctions may coveniently[conveniently] be made
176 An Alexiteral[Alexiterial] Water.
186 their doing eirther[either] Injury to themselves
190 which some, however, liked better to ule[use]
204 studiously avoided all Points of Con-[delete]
Controversy;
205 admoniihes[admonishes] us to use all possible Endeavours
208 agitate the poisonous Mismata[Miasmata],
212 rosatæ [dram] ij. trcchisc[trochisc]. de rhabarb.
215 in colaturâ ad lentum B. calorenz[calorem] dissolve
Aloës
249 continued cold Rains, as likewise does
Fermelius[Fernelius]
252 that is taken Notice off[of] by Physicians
260 small Quantity of some fermening[fermenting] Substances
275 that the Antecedents to a pestilenlential[pestilential]
Fever
283 this kind are cheifly[chiefly] Storax
283 the like: I cannot but imagin[imagine], that for this
288 is plain to all who who[delete] are competent Judges
Start of text.
37. *** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK LOIMOLOGIA: OR,
AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT OF THE PLAGUE IN LONDON IN 1665
***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.
copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in
these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it
in the United States without permission and without paying
copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of
Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything
for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is
very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as
creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research.
Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given
away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with
eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject
to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
START: FULL LICENSE
39. PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or
any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.
Section 1. General Terms of Use and
Redistributing Project Gutenberg™
electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree
to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be
bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund
from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in
paragraph 1.E.8.
1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people
who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a
few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic
works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.
See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with
Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
40. 1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law
in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do
not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing,
performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the
work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of
course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™
mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely
sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated
with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this
agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached
full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge
with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the
terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must
appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™
work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears,
41. or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is
accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived
from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a
notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright
holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the
United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must
comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through
1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted
with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning
of this work.
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project
Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a
part of this work or any other work associated with Project
Gutenberg™.
42. 1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1
with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg™ License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you
provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work
in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in
the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or
expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or
a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original
“Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must
include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in
paragraph 1.E.1.
1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
provided that:
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive
from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
43. periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who
notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt
that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project
Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or
destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
Project Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in
the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90
days of receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend
considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe
and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating
the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project
44. Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may
be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to,
incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a
copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or
damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer
codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for
the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3,
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the
Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a
Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim
all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR
NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR
BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH
1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK
OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL
NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT,
CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF
YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you
discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving
it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by
sending a written explanation to the person you received the work
from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must
return the medium with your written explanation. The person or
entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide
a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work
electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to
give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in
lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may
45. demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the
problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted
by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation,
the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation,
anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with
the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the
following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or
any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission
of Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
46. computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.
It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and
donations from people in all walks of life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a
secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help,
see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
www.gutenberg.org.
Section 3. Information about the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.
The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
Section 4. Information about Donations to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
47. Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can
be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the
widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many
small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to
maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and
keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in
locations where we have not received written confirmation of
compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of
compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where
we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no
prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in
such states who approach us with offers to donate.
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
48. Section 5. General Information About
Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.
Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.
This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how
to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
49. Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.
More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge
connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and
personal growth every day!
testbankfan.com