Nasa+evm+reference+card nov+2015

o The Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR),
Data Item Description DI-MGMT-81861 (latest version)
at http://www.acq.osd.mil/evm/resources/PG-
DIDs.shtml, is a consolidation of the Contract
Performance Report (CPR) and the Integrated Master
Schedule (IMS). See NASA IPMR Data Requirements
Description (DRD) Guide for preparation of the IPMR
DRD.
o Sample Standard Analysis Package
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT REFERENCE CARD
ScheduleSlip
Management Reserve (MR)
Cost Variance
Schedule Variance
“Actuals”
ACWPCum
“Earned”
BCWPCum
“Plan”
BCWSCum
$
EAC
Time
Now
Completion
Date
PMB
Total Allocated Budget (TAB)
BAC
Time
EFFICIENCIES
Cost Efficiency CPI = BCWP / ACWP Favorable is > 1.0, Unfavorable is < 1.0
CPI: For every $1.00 of actual cost, we earned $X worth of work planned
Schedule Efficiency SPI = BCWP / BCWS Favorable is > 1.0, Unfavorable is < 1.0
SPI: For every $1.00 of work planned (scheduled), $X worth of work was accomplished or earned.
CALCULATED ESTIMATE AT COMPLETION = Actuals to Date + [(Remaining Work) / (Performance Factor)]
Examples:
EACCPI = ACWPCUM + [ (BAC – BCWPCUM) / CPICUM ] – typically a best case
EACComposite = ACWPCUM + [ (BAC – BCWPCUM) / (CPICUM * SPICUM) ] – typically a worst case
TO COMPLETE PERFORMANCE INDEX (TCPI) § #
TCPITarget = Work Remaining / Cost Remaining = (BAC – BCWPCUM) / (Target – ACWPCUM)
TCPI: For every $1.00 of cost, estimate to earn $X worth of work planned to finish on EAC
§To Determine the TCPI for BAC or EAC ; Replace TARGET with BAC or EAC
# To Determine the Contract Level TCPI for EAC, You May Replace BAC with TAB
OVERALL STATUS*
% Schedule = (BCWSCUM / BAC) * 100
% Complete = (BCWPCUM / BAC) * 100
% Spent = (ACWPCUM / BAC) * 100
VARIANCES Positive is Favorable, Negative is Unfavorable
Cost Variance CV = BCWP – ACWP
(-)=over (+)=under budget CV % = (CV / BCWP) * 100
Schedule Variance SV = BCWP – BCWS
(-)=behind (+)=over schedule SV % = (SV / BCWS) * 100
Variance at Completion VAC = BAC – EAC
VAC % = (VAC / BAC) * 100
o NASA/SP-2012-599 EVM Implementation Handbook
o NASA/SP-2010-3406 Integrated Baseline Review (IBR)
Handbook
o NASA/SP-2010-3403 NASA Schedule Management
Handbook.
o Reporting for Non-EVM Contracts - see Appendix E
of the NASA/SP-2012-599 Earned Value Management
(EVM) Implementation Handbook for sample DRDs
o Instructions for Requesting Access to Empower
o To request the NASA Schedule Test and Assessment
Tool (STAT) application software, go to the NASA
Software Catalog at
https://software.nasa.gov/software/MFS-32602-1
EVM REPORTS (http://evm.nasa.gov/reports.html)
EVM IMPLEMENTATION HANDBOOKS (http://evm.nasa.gov/handbooks.html )
EVM REGULATIONS/REQUIREMENTS
Refer to the NASA Earned Value Management website http://evm.nasa.gov/
o OMB Circular A-11, Appendix J
o NASA NPD 7120.4D – NASA Engineering and Program/Project Management
o NPR 7120.5 – NASA Space Flight Program and Project Management Requirements - defines when EVM is
required and requires projects with EVM requirements to use an EVM system that complies with the 32 Guidelines
found in the EIA-748 Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Standard
o NPR 7120.7 – NASA Information Technology and Institutional Infrastructure Program and Project Management
Requirements
o NPR 7120.8 – NASA Research and Technology Program and Project Management Requirements
o NASA Procurement Class Deviation (PCD) 15-05, Class Deviation to NFS 1834.2, 1834.203-70, 1852.234-1,and
1852.234-2 – EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, November 10, 2015
o NASA Procurement Information Circular (PIC) 10-17, Class Deviation to NFS 1816.405-274: Award Fee Evaluation
Factors are not Directly Tied to EVM Metrics , November 15, 2010
o NASA PIC 15-06, Guidance on the Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR) for EVM, April 28, 2015
o NASA EVM Contract Requirements Checklist
o NASA/Defense Contract Management Agency Memorandum of Understanding
o NASA/SP-2010-3404 NASA Work Breakdown (WBS)
Structure Handbook
o NASA/SP2015-3708 EVM Reference Guide for Project
Control Account Managers
Work Packages Planning Packages
Control
Accounts
Summary Level
Planning Packages
Overrun
Negotiated
Contract Cost
Over Target
Baseline
Contract
Budget Base
Total Allocated Budget
Contract Price or
In-house Project Price
Performance Measurement
Baseline
Management
Reserve
Profit / Fees
(no In-house equivalent)
Authorized
Unpriced Work
Undistributed
Budget
NASA Contractor & In-house Project Hierarchy
*Note: For total contract, budget at
completion should include management
reserve and undistributed budget
ETC
Baseline Execution Index (BEI) & Hit/Miss Task % (Favorable is > 1.0, Unfavorable is < 1.0)
BEI = Total Baseline Tasks Completed / (Total Tasks with Baseline Finish On or Prior to Current Report Period)
Hit /Miss Task % = 100 * (Tasks Completed ON or PRIOR to Baseline Finish / Tasks Baselined to Finish within
Current Report Period).
1 of 2
Revised November 2015

EVM APPLICATION AND THRESHOLDSACRONYMS
ACWP Actual Cost of Work Performed – Cost actually incurred in accomplishing work performed aka Actual Cost (AC)
AUW Authorized Unpriced Work – Work formally authorized, but not yet negotiated/definitized
BAC Budget At Completion – Total budget for total project/contract thru any given level
BCWP Budgeted Cost for Work Performed – Value of completed work in terms of the work’s assigned budget aka Earned
Value (EV)
BCWS Budgeted Cost for Work Scheduled – Time-phased Budget Plan for work currently scheduled aka Planned Value (PV)
BEI Baseline Execution Index – Similar to the SPI, the metric used to indicate the efficiency with which actual work has been
accomplished when measured against the baseline. It compares the cumulative number of baselined tasks actually
completed each month to the cumulative number of baselined tasks scheduled to be completed each month. To assess
whether the tasks actually completed as planned during a current month, calculate the Hit/Miss Task %.
CA Control Account – Lowest WBS element assigned to a single focal point to plan & control scope / schedule / budget
CBB Contract Budget Base – Sum of the negotiated project/contract cost plus the estimated cost of authorized unpriced work.
It includes the PMB and MR. Customer approval is generally required to change it.
CPI Cost Performance Index – A measure of cost efficiency. Worth of work for every dollar spent. It compares BCWP to the
actual cost to perform that work (CPI = BCWP / ACWP).
CPM Critical Path Method – A sequential path of tasks in a network schedule that represents the longest overall duration
from “time now” through project completion. Any slippage of the tasks in the critical path will increase the project duration.
DRD Data Requirements Description – The document that describes the specific data required for supplier/contract
management and reporting.
EAC Estimate At Completion – Estimate of total cost for project/contract thru any given level generated by Supplier (Ktr),
PMO, DCMA, etc. = EACKtr / PMO / DCMA. The Supplier’s EAC is also known as Latest Revised Estimate (LRE).
ETC Estimate To Complete – Expected/anticipated costs needed to complete the remainder of work on project/contract.
IBR Integrated Baseline Review – A risk-based review conducted by Program/Project Management to ensure mutual
understanding between the customer and supplier of the risks inherent in the supplier’s performance measurement
baseline (PMB) and to ensure the PMB can be accomplished within the authorized schedule and budget.
IPMR Integrated Program Management Report – Consists of seven formats containing data for measuring cost and schedule
performance on Government acquisition contracts (Formats 1-5 formerly the Contract Performance Report (CPR)):
Format 1 defines cost and schedule performance data by product-oriented WBS elements.
Format 2 defines cost and schedule performance data by supplier's organization structure.
Format 3 defines changes to the Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB).
Format 4 Defines staffing forecasts.
Format 5 is a narrative report used to provide the required analysis of data contained in Formats 1-4 and 6.
Format 6 defines and contains the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS).
Format 7 defines the time-phased historical and forecast cost submission.
LOE Level of Effort – Effort of a general or supportive nature that does not produce definite end products. Examples include
supervision, program administration and contract administration.
NCC Negotiated Contract Cost – Contract Price Minus profit or fee(s). For In-house projects, the agreed to value.
OTB Over Target Baseline – Sum of CBB + additional budget approved for remaining work.
PAC Price At Completion – EAC Plus Adjusted Profit or Fee(s).
PMB Performance Measurement Baseline – The time-phased budget plan for authorized work.
PP Planning Package – Far-term effort not yet defined into WPs.
SLPP Summary Level Planning Package – Far-term contract activities not yet defined into CAs.
SPI Schedule Performance Index – A measure of schedule efficiency. It compares the BCWP to the work scheduled
(SPI = BCWP/BCWS). An index of 1.0 means the work is being performed right to the schedule. SPI > 1.0 means
that the work is ahead of schedule. SPI < 1.0 means that the work is behind schedule.
TAB Total Allocated Budget – Sum of all budgets for work on in-house project or contract = NCC, CBB, or OTB.
UB Undistributed Budget – Budget associated with specific work scope or authorized changes that have not been
assigned to a CA or lower level WBS element.
UFE Unallocated Future Expenses – Estimated cost that cannot be allocated to WBS elements due to risk and future needs.
VAC Variance at Completion – Comparison of the BAC to the EAC through any given level (expected overrun or underrun of
total costs)
WP Work Package – Near-term, detail-planned activities within control account; unit of work at level work is performed.
WBS Work Breakdown Structure – A hierarchical product-oriented division of program tasks depicting the breakdown of work
scope for work authorization, tracking, and reporting purposes.
Development/
Production
Contract
(Total
Estimated
Value)
EIA-748
EVMS
(PCD 15-
05)
NASA
EVMS
Solicitation
& Contract
Clause
(PCD15-05)
IPMR
DRD
(PIC 15-06)
WBS
DRD
Project
Cost
Report
DRD
(Non-
EVM)
Supplier
Flow
Down
(EVM)
Cost or
Incentive Type
≥ $100M
Validation
Required
Required:
NFS
1852.234-1
& NFS
1852.234-2
Required:
Formats 1, 3, 5
and 6 (IMS);
Recommended:
Formats 2, 4
and 7
Required Not
Required
Prime
contractor
responsible
for EVMS
requiremen
ts on sub-
contractors
using same
rules as
applied to
prime
contract.
Cost or
Incentive Type
$20M but
< $100M
Compliance
with
guidelines;
validation
not required
Required:
NFS
1852.234-1
& NFS
1852.234-2
with
Alternate
Required:
Formats 1, 3, 5,
and 6 (IMS);
Optional:
Formats 2, 4,
and 7
Required Not
Required
Cost or
Incentive Type
< $20M; Major
Acquisition
Non-
development
contracts
Not
required
(optional at
discretion of
PM)
Not required
unless PM
elects to
require
EVM; then
apply NFS
1852.234-1
& NFS
1852.234-2
with
Alternate
Required:
Format 6 (IMS)
Recommended:
Format 5
(Formats 1, 3
and 7 not
required unless
PM elects to
require EVM)
Required Required
If EVMS
and IPMR
not
required
Firm Fixed
Price > $20M
Not
required
Not required Required:
Format 6 (IMS);
Recommended:
Format 5
Required Not
required
Jerald Kerby, Agency EVM Program Executive & MSFC EVM Focal Point
jerald.g.kerby@nasa.gov
(256) 544-3243
EVM system compliance and use is required on all acquisitions for development designated as major in accordance with
OMB Circular A-11 and the Capital Programming Guide, and for development or production projects/contracts and
subcontracts, including those for flight and ground systems, institutional requirements (facility, information technology,
investment, etc.) valued at or greater than $20 million. The primary consideration for EVM applicability is the nature of the
work, associated risks, and the value of the effort. EVM is not recommended on Firm Fixed Price contracts or contracts
that are exclusively LOE.
Refer to the NASA Earned Value Management website at http://evm.nasa.gov/
2 of 2

Nasa+evm+reference+card nov+2015

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Similar to Nasa+evm+reference+card nov+2015 (20)

More from Dr Ezzat Mansour (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Nasa+evm+reference+card nov+2015