A case study of code switching in trilingual conversations

Research on Humanities and Social Sciences www.iiste.org
ISSN (Paper)2224-5766 ISSN (Online)2225-0484 (Online)
Vol.4, No.22, 2014
180
A Case Study of Code Switching in Trilingual Conversations
Asifa Qasim (Corresponding author)
PhD candidate, The University of Memphis, TN, USA
E-mail: asifaqasim@gmail.com
Zareena Qasim
Assistant Professor, Department of English, University of Sargodha
E-mail: zarinaqasim@yahoo.com
Abstract
In this paper, the codeswitching patterns in two trilingual conversations between two brothers, conducted in
Punjabi, Urdu, and, and English, have been analyzed. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of code switching in
both speakers shows that not only the two subjects are fluent in all three languages, but the use of switching is
significantly similar in both brothers across a number of features, including relative frequency of different switch
types, and the incidence of hybrid constructions involving items from two languages. The subjects appear to
display qualitatively similar patterns of intra-sentential and extra-sentential codeswitching in the trilingual mode.
Similarities in patterns of trilingual codeswitching and the language combinations, used by the two brothers,
were found due to the same linguistic, social and cultural background of the speakers.
Keywords: Code switching, Code mixing, Multilingual communication, Conversation analysis, Communicative
competence, Lexical convergence, Discourse strategies
Introduction
This case study investigates the codeswitching patterns of two Punjabi-Urdu-English trilinguals who live in
Punjab, Pakistan. Due to their having grown up in a bilingual family, in an area where Punjabi and Urdu are in
close contact, codeswitching was an inherent part of the two speakers' natural speech. Their bilingual
codeswitching eventually changed into trilingual codeswitching after they each started their schooling where
English is taught as a foreign language from grade one. An analysis of the speakers' conversation reveals the
dynamics and interaction of three languages. This paper will analyze the bilingual and trilingual codeswitches
produced by the two speakers within two conversations of 50 min each.
As seen in most of the previous studies, English is often one of the languages spoken by multilinguals,
and a tremendous amount of research can be found on multilinguals who speak English, be it as their LI, L2, L3.
The other two languages that constitute the focus of the present study, Punjabi and Urdu, are far less researched.
A broad definition of codeswitching is given by Gumperz (1982) as being 'the juxtaposition within the
same speech exchange of passages of speech belonging to two different grammatical systems or subsystems'. It
is important to remember that, more often than not, codeswitching is a sign of proficiency in several languages
rather than a lack thereof. Codeswitching speakers usually tend to use more than one language in the same
speech passage, combining their linguistic resources to better get a given message across. Some linguists use the
term 'codeswitching' to refer to switching from one language to another between sentences and 'code mixing' for
switches occurring within the same sentence or clause. However, other scholars use these two terms
interchangeably. In this paper, codeswitching is used as the overarching term for any switch between two or
more languages, and when necessary, the distinction will be made by using the terms extra-sentential (i.e. a
switch between two clauses or sentences) and intra-sentential (i.e. a switch within a clause) codeswitching.
There are numerous factors that affect codeswitching patterns. These include conversation topic,
interlocutor's linguistic repertoire, power relationship between speakers, linguistic distance, age, and relative
degree of fluency in the languages involved. As a result, variance both in the type of switching (extra-sentential
and intra-sentential switching) and the amount of use of one or the other language(s) can be observed in
codeswitchers' discourse.
Weninger (2007) investigated the language choice of multilinguals in an academic setting and found
that the power relationship between the interlocutors plays an important role in who initiates the conversation
and who determines what language is used as the base language. Similarly in this study Punjabi has been used as
the base language as the conversants are real brothers whose L1 is Punjabi and they are in an informal setting. If
the same study had been conducted in an academic/professional setting with speakers from different
backgrounds, the base language might have been Urdu or English being the national or academic/professional
languages in formal settings.
The linguistic distance between the languages involved in a conversation will also have a considerable
effect on the patterns of codeswitching. For instance, according to Muysken (2000: 11), 'perceived similarities
between the languages bilinguals speak facilitate code-switching'. In this study, the speakers use three Indo-

Vol.4, No.22, 2014
181
European languages: Punjabi, Urdu, and English. Punjabi and Urdu are closer to each other (SOV) than English
(SVO) is to either of them in terms of syntactic and morphological structures.
Case Study
This case study analyses the codeswitching patterns of two male multilinguals (brothers). From as early on as
birth, the two speakers (referred to hereafter as Z and T) were exposed to two languages: Punjabi, L1 and Urdu,
L2. They each attended an English medium school from first grade to graduation. Thus, speaking and being
understood in different languages, and even two or three languages in the same conversation, were very much a
part of the participants' daily lives. English was mainly used at school for academic purposes. Even though
neither of the two speakers received any schooling in Punjabi, it was the majority language of the community, it
was the language spoken within the family and neighbors. Urdu was the majority language of their home country
and primarily used by the speakers for functioning in the community at large. However, the status of English up
until Z and T's college years was that of a foreign language. But with the passage of time, their codeswitching
patterns may have included more English terms, not as a foreign language, but reflecting social and cultural
realities of living or having lived in a community of professionals, with high level of proficiency in English.
T works as a lawyer in an multilingual working environment and uses Punjabi as the home language. Z
works as an Accounts Officer in mainly an Urdu-English, bilingual environment, and uses Urdu as the home
language. When T and Z talk to each other, they speak Punjabi as the base language, with Urdu and English
elements sprinkled throughout their conversations. Even though the two speakers have full linguistic ability to
carry on conversations with monolingual speakers of all the three languages. The two participants speak with
each other at regular intervals (on the average thrice a week), and the recorded conversations from which the
data for this study were gathered were informal conversations. As far as the length and topic are concerned, the
two conversations were 50 min long each and T and Z spoke about politics, family, current affairs and other such
commonplace subjects. The analysis of the data is guided by the following questions:
1. What are the patterns of codeswitching in these trilingual conversations?
2. Do the two speakers converge or diverge in similar ways with regard to choice of language at the level of a
grammatical unit?
Data collection and analysis
The data for the present study are based on two Skype conversations that the participants had over a period of
two weeks. The conversations amount to a total of 100 minutes. The recordings were audio taped. After all data
collection was completed, the conversations were transcribed, and an analysis of the data followed. In the
codeswitching examples that follow, different fonts have been used in order to facilitate understanding by the
reader. The coding has been used in the following pattern:
Punjabi (Italicized)
Urdu (bolded)
English (underlined)
Due to the fact that the two speakers displayed similar patterns of codeswitching, their discourse was analyzed as
a whole. Every codeswitching instance was counted and placed in its respective language category.
Results and Discussion
As a whole, in this one hundred minutes conversation between T and Z, there were 588 instances of
codeswitching. Of these, more than half (58%) were English-Punjabi codeswitches. The other significant amount
of the codeswitches were Urdu-Punjabi (42%). The frequency of Punjabi words in T's speech is significantly
higher (62%) as compared to that of Z's speech (38%). Similarly, Urdu words are more frequently used in Z's
speech (53%) as opposed to T's speech (47%). The reason might be the use of Punjabi as a home language in T's
case and Urdu as a home language in Z's case. Although the two speakers differ in terms of frequency of lexical
codeswitching of the three languages yet they adhere to the Punjabi syntax as the base language and do not use
complete sentences of Urdu and English except a few phrases. The following table shows the frequency of
codeswitching between the two speakers.
Speaker Turns Total
Words
Punjabi
Words
%age of
Punjabi
Urdu
Words
%age of
Urdu
English
Words
%age of
English
Total 149 2732 2144 80% 246 8% 342 12%
Z 76 1099 805 38% 130 53% 164 47%
T 73 1633 1339 62% 116 47% 178 53%
Punjabi-English Codeswitching
All the English sentences used in these conversations were direct quotes (where Z referred to English-only
context twice in his conversations). For instance, when reporting what people say when they meet in the US, Z
stated: 'How 're you doin?' He talked about the intonation of people in the South of the US. He told his brother

Vol.4, No.22, 2014
182
how his name was mispronounced by Americans. He referred to an instance when he received a call for an
interview and he was addresses as: 'Can I talk to Mr. Za’heed?' (his real name is Zahid) and he was about to say
'no' when he suddenly realized that he was in the US. T used just one sentence in English in the whole
conversation when he mentioned Pakistan Airlines (PIA) as: 'Great people to cry with', to make fun of PIA's TV
advertisement which says: 'Great people to fly with.' Other than the above mentioned examples, all the instances
of English-Punjabi codeswitching were intra-sentential.
The use of English words was mostly based upon Usage frequency. Some words, expressions, or
phrases were simply more easily accessed in English due to the speakers' historically more frequent use of these
words in English as compared to Urdu or Punjabi. For instance welcome, supporter, press, petition, degree,
candidate, campaign, competition, office, weekend, provincial, application, family, knowledge, decision, warrant,
scandal, routes, collapse etc were frequently used in these conversations. The major reason is that the educated
L1 speakers of Punjabi, in Pakistan, do not usually make use of a large Punjabi vocabulary since they are not
literate in Punjabi. Urdu and English are the medium of instruction in academic institutions. So, the educated
multilingual speakers prefer to use certain vocabulary items of one language (English) to the other (regional)
languages to sound educated, sophisticated, and proficient.
The speakers also made use of English compound words like warm welcome, press conference, public
transportation, well-maintained, vote bank, tough competition, load shedding, blood pressure, eye sight, late
night, week end, provincial government, nomination papers, political affiliation. Most of these expressions are
nouns with a few exceptions of verbs. These expressions show the competence of speakers in English language.
The speakers are able enough to incorporate their linguistic and communicative competence in English while
they use their L1 as the base language.
A lexical convergence between Punjabi and English, resulting in Punjabi plurals of English nouns,
occurred when T made use of Punjabi inflections to pluralize English nouns like game+aan=gamaan (games in
Punjabi), file+aan=filaan (files), council+aan=counncilaan (Councils), assembly+ian=assemblian (assemblies),
film+aan=filmaan (films), story+ian=storian (stories), airline+aan=airlinaan (airlines). Z, however, did not use
any such pattern in his speech. T is professionally a lawyer and his profession requires him to closely interact
with clients of semi literate, monolingual, rural Punjabi background. Moreover, he uses Punjabi as a home
language so he is more flexible and proficient in Punjabi syntax than Z to the extent of blending English and
Punjabi morphology.
Finally, the speakers frequently used English vocabulary (especially jargon terms) which is considered
as common vocabulary in multilingual Pakistani society. These words do not have commonly used linguistic
equivalents in local languages. For example, election, laptop, touchpad, camera, email, zip, file, data, delete,
generator, battery, medical, record, certificate, computerized, assembly, airlines, company, specialist etc are used
across the board in all linguistic communities in Pakistan.
Urdu-Punjabi Codeswitching
The integration of Urdu in these Punjabi based conversations is more deeply rooted than just finding an
equivalent in another language, as both of the speakers have been balanced and simultaneous bilinguals in
Punjabi and Urdu. Moreover Punjabi and Urdu have the same syntax i.e. SOV. Both languages are inflectional
and have loose structure so they allow the integration of other languages at all the grammatical levels.
Interestingly, no extra-sentential codeswitching was observed in the Urdu-Punjabi codeswitching pattern.
Urdu quantifiers were preferably used by the two speakers in these conversations. Some of the
quantifiers are phonologically different while the others are completely different words. For instance, bada
(enough) is wada in Punjabi, itna (this much) is aytna in Punjabi, kitna (how much) is kitra/kin’na in Punjabi
with phonological differences. While Kafi (sufficient) is bahat in Punjabi, zaida (much) is changa in Punjabi
which indicate marked difference with no apparent similarity on the phonological level. Therefore the preference
of Urdu quantifiers to English quantifiers is deliberate rather than due to phonological similarities.
Urdu relationship terms were preferably used by both speakers. In Urdu and Punjabi, there is a wide
range of relationship terms to show maternal, paternal and in laws relations. The speakers used bhabi (bharjai,
sister in law), bhateeja (bhetreeya, nephew), bhai (bhera, brother), walid (piyo, father), damad (jawai, son in
law) despite they know the exact equivalent of these relationship terms in Punjabi. These Urdu relationship terms
are due to the superior status of Urdu as compared to Punjabi in the socio-cultural hierarchy of these two
languages.
Urdu and Punjabi collocations were used by both speakers. They made use of noun-noun collocations
for example: parha likha (literate and educated), shughal mela (fun and recreation), dhokha fraud (deception
and fraud), ghar baar (house and property), aa vanj (interaction/relationship), ookha sokha (hook or crook) and
verb-verb collocations: soch smajh (think and ponder), baat cheet (talk and dialogue).
Both speakers made use of Punjabi numeral system for instance: vee (20), yaaraan (11), panj to sat (5-
7), saat uth (7-8), challi (40). A lexical convergence between Punjabi and Urdu also occurs, resulting in Punjabi
plurals of Urdu nouns. Both speakers use Punjabi inflections to pluralize some Urdu nouns. They are most

Vol.4, No.22, 2014
183
probably familiar of the Punjabi equivalents of the same nouns which shows their preference to use Urdu nouns
for example: tasveeran (pictutres), dinaan (days), barishaan (rains), elaqean (areas), in order to sound literate
and sophisticated.
Conclusion and Implications
The codeswitching patterns between the trilingual speakers of this study are complex and revealing. The
speakers move back and forth between the monolingual, bilingual and trilingual mode as reflected in their
Punjabi-English and Punjabi-Urdu codeswitching. Even though the amount of extra-sentential codeswitching
was remarkably lower than the intra-sentential codeswitching, there is sufficient evidence in this study for the
existence of three separate linguistic systems. The findings of this study show that the speakers used Punjabi
(their L1) as the base language and Urdu and English as markers of their socio-cultural background. The data
shows that Urdu and English are integrated not only as facilitators but social markers of identity in these Punjabi
conversations. The three languages play three clearly assigned roles in these conversations (Punjabi at the
syntactic level, Urdu at the phonological and morphological level and English at the morphological level). Still
the socio-political status of each language has a decisive role in making the speakers prefer one language to the
other. The speakers' discourse was in large part a reflection of their social and cultural identity. To use Stavans
and Swisher's (2006: 215) remark regarding the codeswitching of trilinguals: 'Reconciling three language
systems entails "juggling" not only conceptual information but also linguistic and cultural information.' Thus, the
speakers in this case study brought their linguistic and cultural history into their discourse as revealed through
codeswitching.'
However, the sample size in this study was too small to establish anything with certainty. This study
found no significant differences between the two brothers with respect to the frequency of types of
codeswitching. Both of them used more intra-sentential and significantly less extra-sentential switches. It is
difficult to speculate if these patterns occur in the same way, when these speakers are in a different setting,
talking to people of different background in terms of class, gender, ethnicity, profession, and education. There is
a need to explore trilingual conversations and the codeswitching patterns that will emerge in different contexts
and speakers with diverse background.
References
Backus, A. (1996) Two in One: Bilingual Speech of Turkish Immigrants in the Netherlands. Tilburg: Tilburg
University Press.
Clyne, M. (1997). Some of the things trilinguals do. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 1, 95 – 116.
De Bot, K. (2004) The multilingual lexicon: Modeling selection and control. International Journal of
Multilingualism 1 (1), 17-32.
Dewaele, J.-M., & Pavlenko, A. (2003). Productivity and lexical richness in native and non-native speech: A
study of cross-cultural effects. In V. Cook (Ed.), The effects of the second language on the first, 120 –
141. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Edwards, M., & Gardner-Chloros, P. (2006). Compound verbs in codeswitching: Bilinguals making do?
International Journal of Bilingualism, 11, 73–91.
Gumperz, J. (1982) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Hoffman, C. (2001) The status of trilingualism in bilingualism studies. In J. Cenoz, U. Jessner and B. Hufeisen
(eds) Looking Beyond Second Language Acquisition: Studies in Tri- and Mutlilingualism, 6, 13-25.
Tübingen: Stauffenburg
Muysken, P. (2000) Bilingual Speech: A Typology of Code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993 and 1997) Duelling Languages: Grammatical Structure in Codeswitching. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Stavans, A.' and Swisher, V. (2006) Language switching as a window on trilingual acquisition. International
Journal of Multilingualism 3 (3), 193-220.
Weninger, C. (2007) Speakers' perception of code choice in a foreign language academic department. Journal of
Multilingual and Multicultural Development 28 (2), 134-151.

Business, Economics, Finance and Management Journals PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
European Journal of Business and Management EJBM@iiste.org
Research Journal of Finance and Accounting RJFA@iiste.org
Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development JESD@iiste.org
Information and Knowledge Management IKM@iiste.org
Journal of Developing Country Studies DCS@iiste.org
Industrial Engineering Letters IEL@iiste.org
Physical Sciences, Mathematics and Chemistry Journals PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Natural Sciences Research JNSR@iiste.org
Journal of Chemistry and Materials Research CMR@iiste.org
Journal of Mathematical Theory and Modeling MTM@iiste.org
Advances in Physics Theories and Applications APTA@iiste.org
Chemical and Process Engineering Research CPER@iiste.org
Engineering, Technology and Systems Journals PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems CEIS@iiste.org
Innovative Systems Design and Engineering ISDE@iiste.org
Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy JETP@iiste.org
Information and Knowledge Management IKM@iiste.org
Journal of Control Theory and Informatics CTI@iiste.org
Journal of Information Engineering and Applications JIEA@iiste.org
Industrial Engineering Letters IEL@iiste.org
Journal of Network and Complex Systems NCS@iiste.org
Environment, Civil, Materials Sciences Journals PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Environment and Earth Science JEES@iiste.org
Journal of Civil and Environmental Research CER@iiste.org
Life Science, Food and Medical Sciences PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Advances in Life Science and Technology ALST@iiste.org
Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare JBAH@iiste.org
Journal of Food Science and Quality Management FSQM@iiste.org
Journal of Chemistry and Materials Research CMR@iiste.org
Education, and other Social Sciences PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Education and Practice JEP@iiste.org
Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization JLPG@iiste.org
Journal of New Media and Mass Communication NMMC@iiste.org
Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy JETP@iiste.org
Historical Research Letter HRL@iiste.org
Public Policy and Administration Research PPAR@iiste.org
International Affairs and Global Strategy IAGS@iiste.org
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences RHSS@iiste.org
Journal of Developing Country Studies DCS@iiste.org
Journal of Arts and Design Studies ADS@iiste.org

The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open-Access hosting service and academic event management.
The aim of the firm is Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.
More information about the firm can be found on the homepage:
http://www.iiste.org
CALL FOR JOURNAL PAPERS
There are more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals hosted under the hosting platform.
Prospective authors of journals can find the submission instruction on the following
page: http://www.iiste.org/journals/ All the journals articles are available online to the
readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those
inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Paper version of the journals is also
available upon request of readers and authors.
MORE RESOURCES
Book publication information: http://www.iiste.org/book/
IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners
EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek
EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

A case study of code switching in trilingual conversations

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to A case study of code switching in trilingual conversations (20)

More from Alexander Decker (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

A case study of code switching in trilingual conversations