Issue Date:
Revision:
IPv6 in Asia:
Laggards and Trends
11 July 2016
1
July 2016
Guangliang Pan
IPv6 allocations
How many allocations have been made by each RIR by year?
2
Percentage of RIR members with IPv6 in each
region
3
Global IPv6 active BGP entries
4
IPv6 capability, worldwide (weighted)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2013-10
2013-11
2013-12
2014-01
2014-02
2014-03
2014-04
2014-05
2014-06
2014-07
2014-08
2014-09
2014-10
2014-11
2014-12
2015-01
2015-02
2015-03
2015-04
2015-05
2015-06
2015-07
2015-08
2015-09
2015-10
2015-11
2015-12
2016-01
2016-02
2016-03
2016-04
2016-05
2016-06
%IPv6capable
5
6.5%? Google says 10+?
• APNIC applies a weighting function to get the total
measurements:
– Based on ITU internet population data; to adjust for sample size
anomalies worldwide
• You can consider this worldwide figure as a low-side count
– and the Google (and other) measures as a high-side count
• It’s probably somewhere in between the two
6
IPv6 capability, worldwide (weighted)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2013-10
2013-12
2014-02
2014-04
2014-06
2014-08
2014-10
2014-12
2015-02
2015-04
2015-06
2015-08
2015-10
2015-12
2016-02
2016-04
2016-06
%IPv6capable
7
CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 %
BE 53.35% CH 29.49% US 29.02% DE 28.44% PT 28.33% GR 26.77%
EE 19.34% PE 18.97% LU 17.63% JP 16.79% FI 16.76% MY 13.81%
EU 12.94% FR 12.54% BR 10.86% GB 10.78% CA 10.35% NO 9.65%
HT 9.50% NL 8.27% SG 8.23% RO 8.13% AT 7.26% CZ 6.21%
CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6%
IE 5.36% AU 4.82% HU 4.56% BO 4.35% SE 4.28% AX 4.05%
SA 3.97% BA 3.71% NZ 3.03% PL 2.86% TR 2.30% HK 1.53%
SI 1.51% LK 1.41% MT 1.34% RU 1.33% IN 1.30% KR 1.20%
TT 0.96% BT 0.86% CW 0.77% BG 0.68% CN 0.51% VN 0.50%
IT 0.49% UA 0.43% MD 0.40% DK 0.39% IL 0.36% TH 0.33%
SD 0.27% BQ 0.23% SK 0.21% LV 0.21% ZA 0.21% LT 0.21%
BW 0.17% GF 0.16% MK 0.12% TW 0.12% CL 0.12% ES 0.11%
IS 0.11% ID 0.10% TZ 0.10% GT 0.10% PA 0.10%
8
Above and below the line
IPv6 capable rate by economy
9
Emerging problem in the AP region
• Few economies in the AP region are above world-grade
IPv6 capability (green)
• Of the economies below the line, many are stagnant (red);
some are moving upward (yellow)
• Hard to quantify what quality determines ranking
10
It’s not just about
economic size;
diversity of the ISP
Is it about capital
investment, or
other reasons?
Two kinds of Internet?
• IPv4 and IPv6 can’t directly interoperate as protocols
– You can tunnel, and you can gateway but you can’t send IP packets
directly from
• 2000::/3 to 10.0.0.0/8
– The decision to proceed with IPv6 deployment implies dual-stack
operations; short or long term
– The decision to remain in IPv4 implies increasing use of CGN and
other techniques to maximize address reuse
11
There is no avoidance of extra
technology costs to continue to grow
the Internet
It looks like it on a macro scale
• There are signs that at a high-level view, the economies
investing in IPv6 are now diverging from the ones who are
staying with IPv4
– It’s not just about size, or economic capacity
• Let’s review some of the players in each ‘camp’
– Some economies with signs of significant IPv6 deployment
– Some economies with little or no sign of significant IPv6 deployment
12
IPv6 capability, worldwide (weighted)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 2013-10
2013-11
2013-12
2014-01
2014-02
2014-03
2014-04
2014-05
2014-06
2014-07
2014-08
2014-09
2014-10
2014-11
2014-12
2015-01
2015-02
2015-03
2015-04
2015-05
2015-06
2015-07
2015-08
2015-09
2015-10
2015-11
2015-12
2016-01
2016-02
2016-03
2016-04
2016-05
2016-06
%IPv6capable
13
High IPv6 capability in the Asia Pacific
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 2011-10
2011-12
2012-02
2012-04
2012-06
2012-08
2012-10
2012-12
2013-02
2013-04
2013-06
2013-08
2013-10
2013-12
2014-02
2014-04
2014-06
2014-08
2014-10
2014-12
2015-02
2015-04
2015-06
2015-08
2015-10
2015-12
2016-02
2016-04
2016-06
%IPv6capable
JP
AU
MY
SG
14
SK Telecom (Korea)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 2011-10
2011-12
2012-02
2012-04
2012-06
2012-08
2012-10
2012-12
2013-02
2013-04
2013-06
2013-08
2013-10
2013-12
2014-02
2014-04
2014-06
2014-08
2014-10
2014-12
2015-02
2015-04
2015-06
2015-08
2015-10
2015-12
2016-02
2016-04
2016-06
%IPv6capable
15
TMNET (Malaysia)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 2011-10
2011-12
2012-02
2012-04
2012-06
2012-08
2012-10
2012-12
2013-02
2013-04
2013-06
2013-08
2013-10
2013-12
2014-02
2014-04
2014-06
2014-08
2014-10
2014-12
2015-02
2015-04
2015-06
2015-08
2015-10
2015-12
2016-02
2016-04
2016-06
%IPv6capable
16
Softbank-BB, KDDI (Japan)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 2011-10
2011-12
2012-02
2012-04
2012-06
2012-08
2012-10
2012-12
2013-02
2013-04
2013-06
2013-08
2013-10
2013-12
2014-02
2014-04
2014-06
2014-08
2014-10
2014-12
2015-02
2015-04
2015-06
2015-08
2015-10
2015-12
2016-02
2016-04
2016-06
%IPv6capable
17676
2516
17
StarHub, StarHub CableVision (Singapore)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 2011-10
2011-12
2012-02
2012-04
2012-06
2012-08
2012-10
2012-12
2013-02
2013-04
2013-06
2013-08
2013-10
2013-12
2014-02
2014-04
2014-06
2014-08
2014-10
2014-12
2015-02
2015-04
2015-06
2015-08
2015-10
2015-12
2016-02
2016-04
2016-06
%IPv6capable
55430
10091
18
Telstra, Internode, Australia
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 2011-10
2011-12
2012-02
2012-04
2012-06
2012-08
2012-10
2012-12
2013-02
2013-04
2013-06
2013-08
2013-10
2013-12
2014-02
2014-04
2014-06
2014-08
2014-10
2014-12
2015-02
2015-04
2015-06
2015-08
2015-10
2015-12
2016-02
2016-04
2016-06
%IPv6capable
1221
4739
19
High IPv6 capability, selected economies
worldwide
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2011-10
2011-12
2012-02
2012-04
2012-06
2012-08
2012-10
2012-12
2013-02
2013-04
2013-06
2013-08
2013-10
2013-12
2014-02
2014-04
2014-06
2014-08
2014-10
2014-12
2015-02
2015-04
2015-06
2015-08
2015-10
2015-12
2016-02
2016-04
2016-06
%IPv6capable
US
GB
DE
BE
EC
BR
20
Top 10 by sample, US
ASN AS name IPv6
capable
IPv6
preferred
#
Samples
AS7922 Comcast Cable Communications,
Inc.
61.75% 57.28% 14304843
AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - ATT Services,
Inc.
80.57% 73.20% 8526953
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation 0.00% 0.00% 5325116
AS701 Verizon Business 0.14% 0.01% 4728691
AS20115 Charter Communications 0.10% 0.02% 3463344
AS22773 Cox Communications Inc. 17.46% 16.15% 3164061
AS22394 Verizon Wireless 89.70% 80.89% 2621733
AS209 Qwest Communications Company 0.17% 0.10% 2432793
AS20057 ATT Mobility 9.50% 9.32% 2410034
AS10796 Time Warner Cable Internet 23.30% 21.79% 1999827
21
Top 10 by sample, BE
ASN AS name IPv6
capable
IPv6
preferred
#
Samples
AS5432 BELGACOM-SKYNET-AS
Proximus NV
44.06% 42.09% 958021
AS6848 TELENET-AS Telenet N.V. 71.09% 67.94% 879004
AS12392 ASBRUTELE Brutele SC 72.96% 70.51% 237980
AS47377 MES Mobistar SA 0.20% 0.05% 56730
AS21502 Numericable S.A. 0.01% 0.01% 48287
AS2611 BELNET BELNET 13.39% 12.44% 25361
AS44944 BASE-AS BASE Company NVSA 0.45% 0.16% 22518
AS29587 SCHEDOM-AS schedom vof 0.00% 0.00% 9654
AS41756 Orascom Telecom Algeria Spa 0.00% 0.00% 8245
AS51964 ORANGE-BUSINESS-
SERVICES-IPSN
0.00% 0.00% 7811
22
Top 10 by Samples, GB
ASN AS name IPv6
capable
IPv6
preferred
#
Samples
AS5607 Sky UK Limited 51.06% 49.36% 798472
AS5089 NTL Virgin Media Limited 0.01% 0.01% 739599
AS43766 MTC-KSA-AS MTC KSA 0.00% 0.00% 676236
AS2856 British Telecommunications PLC 0.26% 0.24% 658706
AS13285 TalkTalk Communications Limited 0.00% 0.00% 173033
AS12576 ORANGE-PCS EE Limited 0.10% 0.05% 154985
AS9105 TISCALI-UK Tiscali UK Limited 0.00% 0.00% 153678
AS9009 M247 M247 Ltd 0.06% 0.02% 142583
AS60339 H3GUK Hutchison 3G UK Limited 0.09% 0.03% 97854
AS34825 ONAVO Onavo Mobile Ltd 0.01% 0.00% 90392
23
Top 10 by Samples, DE
ASN AS name IPv6
capable
IPv6
preferred
#
Samples
AS3320 DTAG Deutsche Telekom AG 50.24% 48.39% 256677
AS200185 XANDMAIL-ASN X AND MAIL SA 0.00% 0.00% 115142
AS3209 VODANET Vodafone GmbH 0.15% 0.07% 81574
AS24940 HETZNER-AS Hetzner Online
GmbH
5.86% 4.78% 65769
AS28753 Leaseweb Deutschland GmbH 39.91% 0.71% 61988
AS31334 Vodafone Kabel Deutschland
GmbH
69.06% 65.82% 59817
AS6805 Telefonica Germany GmbH
Co.OHG
0.41% 0.33% 52396
AS6830 Liberty Global Operations B.V. 58.68% 55.50% 40648
AS8972 PLUSSERVER-AS PlusServer AG 0.81% 0.05% 25969
AS29562 KABELBW-ASN Kabel BW GmbH 56.36% 53.48% 23299
24
Top 10 by samples BR
ASN AS Name IPv6
Capable
IPv6
Preferred
#
Samples
AS28573 CLARO S.A. 22.60% 20.60% 1354868
AS18881 Global Village Telecom 21.89% 20.73% 892808
AS7738 Telemar Norte Leste S.A. 3.84% 3.68% 575631
AS27699 TELEFNICA BRASIL S.A 2.26% 2.10% 419031
AS8167 Brasil Telecom SA - 2.46% 2.39% 339728
AS26615 Tim Celular S.A. 4.71% 4.60% 104354
AS26599 TELEFNICA BRASIL S.A 13.51% 13.12% 102621
AS53006 ALGAR TELECOM SA 0.05% 0.05% 62938
AS14868 COPEL Telecom S.A. 22.30% 21.73% 44573
AS22085 Claro SA 0.19% 0.04% 40324
25
Top 10 by samples, EC
ASN AS Name IPv6
Capable
IPv6
Preferred
#
Samples
AS14420 CNT EP 45.13% 43.66% 1582536
AS14522 Satnet 0.00% 0.00% 438480
AS27947 Telconet S.A 0.03% 0.03% 424395
AS27738 Ecuadortelecom S.A. 0.00% 0.00% 278140
AS23487 CONECEL 0.02% 0.01% 157551
AS19114 Otecel S.A. 0.03% 0.01% 155074
AS52257 Telconet S.A 0.01% 0.00% 135138
AS27668 ETAPA EP 0.00% 0.00% 126933
AS22724 PUNTONET S.A. 0.01% 0.01% 110372
AS28006 CNT EP 0.02% 0.01% 42226
26
Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2011-10
2011-12
2012-02
2012-04
2012-06
2012-08
2012-10
2012-12
2013-02
2013-04
2013-06
2013-08
2013-10
2013-12
2014-02
2014-04
2014-06
2014-08
2014-10
2014-12
2015-02
2015-04
2015-06
2015-08
2015-10
2015-12
2016-02
2016-04
2016-06
%IPv6capable
7922
22394
7018
21928
27
IPv6 capability, China
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2011-10
2011-12
2012-02
2012-04
2012-06
2012-08
2012-10
2012-12
2013-02
2013-04
2013-06
2013-08
2013-10
2013-12
2014-02
2014-04
2014-06
2014-08
2014-10
2014-12
2015-02
2015-04
2015-06
2015-08
2015-10
2015-12
2016-02
2016-04
2016-06
%IPv6capable
28
What we know about China
1,382,013,910 people
692,388,968 Internet users
50% penetration
1,273 ASes
10.35T GDP
IPv4 316 in BGP
337,887,232 addresses
0.24 per head
88% visible
IPv6 55 in BGP
89,167,817 M addresses
64,520 per head
1% visible
1% capability
29
Top 10 by samples, China
ASN AS Name IPv6
Capable
IPv6
Preferred
# Samples
AS4134 CHINANET-BACKBONE 0.42% 0.24% 12628000
AS4837 CHINA169-BACKBONE CNCGROUP 0.21% 0.15% 9910451
AS9808 Guangdong Mobile Communication 0.09% 0.03% 2006643
AS4812 CHINANET-SH-AP China Telecom 0.17% 0.07% 1632577
AS4808 CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP
network
1.12% 0.77% 1166552
AS56046 CMNET-JIANGSU-AP China Mobile 0.07% 0.01% 779374
AS56041 CMNET-ZHEJIANG-AP China Mobile 0.05% 0.00% 720916
AS24547 Hebei Mobile Communication 0.03% 0.00% 698409
AS17816 China Unicom IP network 0.27% 0.19% 479682
AS23724 China Telecommunications 0.14% 0.01% 317333
30
Top 10 IPv6 capability, China
ASN AS Name IPv6
Capable
IPv6
Preferred
#
Samples
AS23910 China Next Generation Internet 98.43% 92.52% 508
AS109 CISCOSYSTEMS - Cisco Systems,
Inc.
73.08% 66.59% 416
AS4538 China Ed. and Research Network 25.05% 18.81% 186951
AS7497 Computer Network Information 23.73% 22.28% 18295
AS18240 Bitone United Networks Technology 8.12% 5.65% 15153
AS4809 China Telecom Next Generation 7.38% 5.48% 16227
AS56040 China Mobile communications 6.81% 3.83% 73891
AS38019 Mobile Communication Company 3.30% 2.38% 13318
AS58466 CHINANET Guangdong province 2.79% 0.00% 11758
AS4847 China Networks Inter-Exchange 2.63% 1.99% 184230
31
AS numbers announcing IPv4 and IPv6 in
China
32
So: is this an address
distribution problem?
No! This isn’t a distribution problem
• Lets look at some history
– Growth in distinct INR holders by economy over time
– Amount of IPv4, IPv6 by INR holder count by economy over time
• What kinds of trend do we see?
IPv4 by economy by holder, various
economies
IPv4 by economy by holder, various
economies
Forms
A group
IPv4 by economy by holder
China
CN is above
average
IPv6 by economy by holder, various
economies
IPv6 by economy by holder, various
economies
Forms
A group
IPv6 by economy by holder
China compared to Mean
CN is above
average
IPv6 by economy by holder
China, compared to IPv4
Significantly
More space per
INR holder
It’s not an allocation problem
• Its clear that The RIR system and CNNIC in particular has
performed VERY WELL in maintaining equitable access to
INR
– CN INR holders hold more than the average
– CN INR holders have significantly more IPv6 holdings per end-site,
than they have IPv4 per customer/user
• There is no doubt we’ve done our job!
– But there is still much to do, encouraging IPv6
• The problem is a deployment problem not an allocation
problem
IPv4 addresses delegations worldwide
In terms of /8s, how much space did each RIR issue by year?
43
Available IPv4 /8s in each RIR
44
IPv6 Address Delegations to China
(Number of delegations by year)
45
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
2000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Suggestions
• Have your IPv6 development plan ready NOW not later
• Apply for your IPv6 addresses if you have not done so
– APNIC direct Members: One Click via MyAPNIC
– CNNIC members: Apply via CNNIC
• Send technical staff to IPv6 training
• Deploy your IPv6 network
• Provide IPv6 services to your customers
46
Acknowledgement
• Many thanks to the APNIC Research Team - Geoff Huston,
George Michaelson and Byron Ellacott for their useful
measurement data and great support to prepare this
presentation!
• For more information, please visit:
»http://labs.apnic.net/
47
Share your IPv6 stories
• APNIC Blog
– https://blog.apnic.net/
• IPv6 Deployment Survey
– http://survey.consulintel.es/index.php/175122
48
Your views matter!
49
https://survey.apnic.net
Thank you
gpan@apnic.net

More Related Content

PDF
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - SANOG Edition
PPTX
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
PDF
IPv6 - delegations, deployment and trends, SANOG 29
PPTX
Communicasia2017: IPv6 measurements
PPTX
RightsCon 2015: IPv6 for n00bs
PDF
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
PDF
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment
PPTX
IPv6 readiness among APEC TEL member economies
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - SANOG Edition
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
IPv6 - delegations, deployment and trends, SANOG 29
Communicasia2017: IPv6 measurements
RightsCon 2015: IPv6 for n00bs
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment
IPv6 readiness among APEC TEL member economies

What's hot (20)

PPTX
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
PPTX
Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?
PPTX
Increasing IPv6 deployment in Indonesia
PPTX
The $1000 Internet Exchange
PDF
IPv6 performance
PPTX
APNIC IPv4 Waiting list - AusNOG 2016
PDF
Networking The Pacific, by Jonathan Brewer [APRICOT 2015]
PPTX
APNIC Member Gathering: Myanmar
PDF
IPv6 status among ASEAN Member States
PPTX
APNIC Member Gathering, China
PPTX
The State of IPv6, PTC17
PDF
DNSSEC Measurement APTLD 71
PDF
The State of IP Addresses
PDF
Multipathed, Multiplexed, Multilateral Transport Protocols - Decoupling trans...
PDF
IPv6 deployment, India
PPTX
APNIC Update - NZNOG 2017
PDF
Measuring IPv6 ISP performance
PDF
IPv6 readiness among APEC TEL member economies
PPTX
ION Hangzhou - IPv6 in Asia: Laggards and Trends
PDF
Scaling BGP
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
Who needs IPv6...in the Pacific?
Increasing IPv6 deployment in Indonesia
The $1000 Internet Exchange
IPv6 performance
APNIC IPv4 Waiting list - AusNOG 2016
Networking The Pacific, by Jonathan Brewer [APRICOT 2015]
APNIC Member Gathering: Myanmar
IPv6 status among ASEAN Member States
APNIC Member Gathering, China
The State of IPv6, PTC17
DNSSEC Measurement APTLD 71
The State of IP Addresses
Multipathed, Multiplexed, Multilateral Transport Protocols - Decoupling trans...
IPv6 deployment, India
APNIC Update - NZNOG 2017
Measuring IPv6 ISP performance
IPv6 readiness among APEC TEL member economies
ION Hangzhou - IPv6 in Asia: Laggards and Trends
Scaling BGP
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PDF
IPv6 Deployment, where are we now? - Asia Pacific Regional Internet Governanc...
PDF
Holocaust Glossary
PPSX
Power poit m.a.pptx 2015
PPTX
PDF
Ficha de inscripción para Salseando Canarias Tour
PPTX
Victor fajardo
PDF
Bylc annual report 2009
DOC
Wie Funktioniert ein Hochregallager
PPTX
Guía básica para encontrar empleo
PPTX
U1 t1act1perspectiva.jessicavm
PDF
No Show 2012 - Mitchell Smallman - At Least Your Parents HAVE a Basement
DOCX
áNgeles en la tierra
PDF
Making your Corporate Blog a Customer Connection Hub
PPS
Caso audiencias m80
PPTX
Presentacion reciclos lean & green
PPT
Presentación Alaska Holland America
PPTX
Sor teresa de jesús baqc
PDF
Cronología de un ataque en Skype - La propagación del gusano Rodpicom
PPTX
Powering Successful Marketing Campaigns with Accurate, Safe Data
IPv6 Deployment, where are we now? - Asia Pacific Regional Internet Governanc...
Holocaust Glossary
Power poit m.a.pptx 2015
Ficha de inscripción para Salseando Canarias Tour
Victor fajardo
Bylc annual report 2009
Wie Funktioniert ein Hochregallager
Guía básica para encontrar empleo
U1 t1act1perspectiva.jessicavm
No Show 2012 - Mitchell Smallman - At Least Your Parents HAVE a Basement
áNgeles en la tierra
Making your Corporate Blog a Customer Connection Hub
Caso audiencias m80
Presentacion reciclos lean & green
Presentación Alaska Holland America
Sor teresa de jesús baqc
Cronología de un ataque en Skype - La propagación del gusano Rodpicom
Powering Successful Marketing Campaigns with Accurate, Safe Data
Ad

Similar to IPv6 trends in Asia (20)

PDF
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
PDF
IPv6 Deployment in 2022 presentation by Guangliang Pan.pdf
PDF
AP IPv6 Taskforce Economies: IPv6 Capabilty from APNIC measurements
PDF
PhNOG 2022: APNIC Update - IPv6 and RPKI
PDF
APEC TEL 56: IPv6 Deployment Update
PDF
State of IPv6 in 2018: IETF 101
PDF
An IPv6 Update
PDF
CommunicAsia 2022: Global IPv6 deployment - five years on
PDF
ION Islamabad - IPv6 - Delegations, Deployments and Trends
PDF
NZNOG 2023: IPv6 - A retrospective look
PDF
RIPE 76: Is IPv6 on for the rich?
PDF
ConnecTechAsia 2018: Global IPv6 Deployment Update
PDF
IDNIC OPM 2017: IPv6 Update
PDF
CNIRC 2023: Global and Regional IPv6 Deployment 2023
PPTX
Global IPv6 Summit Presentation - Global Deployment or Digital Divide
PDF
Where are we now? IPv6 deployment update
PDF
APNIC IPv6 Advancements, presented by Sunny Chendi
PDF
30th TWNIC OPM and 2018 TWNOG: IPv6 in Taiwan, the Asia Pacific and worldwide
PDF
IPv6: Unlocking the Potential, presented by Paul Wilson at CommunicAsia 2024
PDF
APEC TEL 64: IPv6 deployment — an APNIC update
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
IPv6 Deployment in 2022 presentation by Guangliang Pan.pdf
AP IPv6 Taskforce Economies: IPv6 Capabilty from APNIC measurements
PhNOG 2022: APNIC Update - IPv6 and RPKI
APEC TEL 56: IPv6 Deployment Update
State of IPv6 in 2018: IETF 101
An IPv6 Update
CommunicAsia 2022: Global IPv6 deployment - five years on
ION Islamabad - IPv6 - Delegations, Deployments and Trends
NZNOG 2023: IPv6 - A retrospective look
RIPE 76: Is IPv6 on for the rich?
ConnecTechAsia 2018: Global IPv6 Deployment Update
IDNIC OPM 2017: IPv6 Update
CNIRC 2023: Global and Regional IPv6 Deployment 2023
Global IPv6 Summit Presentation - Global Deployment or Digital Divide
Where are we now? IPv6 deployment update
APNIC IPv6 Advancements, presented by Sunny Chendi
30th TWNIC OPM and 2018 TWNOG: IPv6 in Taiwan, the Asia Pacific and worldwide
IPv6: Unlocking the Potential, presented by Paul Wilson at CommunicAsia 2024
APEC TEL 64: IPv6 deployment — an APNIC update

More from APNIC (20)

PPTX
APNIC Report, presented at APAN 60 by Thy Boskovic
PDF
APNIC Update, presented at PHNOG 2025 by Shane Hermoso
PDF
RPKI Status Update, presented by Makito Lay at IDNOG 10
PDF
The Internet -By the Numbers, Sri Lanka Edition
PDF
Triggering QUIC, presented by Geoff Huston at IETF 123
PDF
DNSSEC Made Easy, presented at PHNOG 2025
PDF
BGP Security Best Practices that Matter, presented at PHNOG 2025
PDF
APNIC's Role in the Pacific Islands, presented at Pacific IGF 2205
PDF
IPv6 Deployment and Best Practices, presented by Makito Lay
PDF
Cleaning up your RPKI invalids, presented at PacNOG 35
PDF
The Internet - By the numbers, presented at npNOG 11
PDF
Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and Starlink
PDF
DDoS in India, presented at INNOG 8 by Dave Phelan
PDF
Global Networking Trends, presented at the India ISP Conclave 2025
PDF
Make DDoS expensive for the threat actors
PDF
Fast Reroute in SR-MPLS, presented at bdNOG 19
PDF
DDos Mitigation Strategie, presented at bdNOG 19
PDF
ICP -2 Review – What It Is, and How to Participate and Provide Your Feedback
PDF
APNIC Update - Global Synergy among the RIRs: Connecting the Regions
PDF
Measuring Starlink Protocol Performance, presented at LACNIC 43
APNIC Report, presented at APAN 60 by Thy Boskovic
APNIC Update, presented at PHNOG 2025 by Shane Hermoso
RPKI Status Update, presented by Makito Lay at IDNOG 10
The Internet -By the Numbers, Sri Lanka Edition
Triggering QUIC, presented by Geoff Huston at IETF 123
DNSSEC Made Easy, presented at PHNOG 2025
BGP Security Best Practices that Matter, presented at PHNOG 2025
APNIC's Role in the Pacific Islands, presented at Pacific IGF 2205
IPv6 Deployment and Best Practices, presented by Makito Lay
Cleaning up your RPKI invalids, presented at PacNOG 35
The Internet - By the numbers, presented at npNOG 11
Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and Starlink
DDoS in India, presented at INNOG 8 by Dave Phelan
Global Networking Trends, presented at the India ISP Conclave 2025
Make DDoS expensive for the threat actors
Fast Reroute in SR-MPLS, presented at bdNOG 19
DDos Mitigation Strategie, presented at bdNOG 19
ICP -2 Review – What It Is, and How to Participate and Provide Your Feedback
APNIC Update - Global Synergy among the RIRs: Connecting the Regions
Measuring Starlink Protocol Performance, presented at LACNIC 43

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Internet Safety for Seniors presentation
PDF
Course Overview and Agenda cloud security
PPTX
Layers_of_the_Earth_Grade7.pptx class by
PPTX
module 1-Part 1.pptxdddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
PDF
simpleintnettestmetiaerl for the simple testint
PPTX
IPCNA VIRTUAL CLASSES INTERMEDIATE 6 PROJECT.pptx
PPTX
KSS ON CYBERSECURITY INCIDENT RESPONSE AND PLANNING MANAGEMENT.pptx
PPTX
curriculumandpedagogyinearlychildhoodcurriculum-171021103104 - Copy.pptx
PPTX
AI_Cyberattack_Solutions AI AI AI AI .pptx
PPT
415456121-Jiwratrwecdtwfdsfwgdwedvwe dbwsdjsadca-EVN.ppt
PPTX
artificialintelligenceai1-copy-210604123353.pptx
PPTX
newyork.pptxirantrafgshenepalchinachinane
PDF
Alethe Consulting Corporate Profile and Solution Aproach
PPTX
Introduction to cybersecurity and digital nettiquette
PPTX
Reading as a good Form of Recreation
PPT
12 Things That Make People Trust a Website Instantly
PPT
FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTROL PLAN- LUS.FM.MQ.OM.UTM.PLN.00014.ppt
PDF
BIOCHEM CH2 OVERVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY.pdf
PPTX
The-Importance-of-School-Sanitation.pptx
PDF
Alethe Consulting Corporate Profile and Solution Aproach
Internet Safety for Seniors presentation
Course Overview and Agenda cloud security
Layers_of_the_Earth_Grade7.pptx class by
module 1-Part 1.pptxdddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
simpleintnettestmetiaerl for the simple testint
IPCNA VIRTUAL CLASSES INTERMEDIATE 6 PROJECT.pptx
KSS ON CYBERSECURITY INCIDENT RESPONSE AND PLANNING MANAGEMENT.pptx
curriculumandpedagogyinearlychildhoodcurriculum-171021103104 - Copy.pptx
AI_Cyberattack_Solutions AI AI AI AI .pptx
415456121-Jiwratrwecdtwfdsfwgdwedvwe dbwsdjsadca-EVN.ppt
artificialintelligenceai1-copy-210604123353.pptx
newyork.pptxirantrafgshenepalchinachinane
Alethe Consulting Corporate Profile and Solution Aproach
Introduction to cybersecurity and digital nettiquette
Reading as a good Form of Recreation
12 Things That Make People Trust a Website Instantly
FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTROL PLAN- LUS.FM.MQ.OM.UTM.PLN.00014.ppt
BIOCHEM CH2 OVERVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY.pdf
The-Importance-of-School-Sanitation.pptx
Alethe Consulting Corporate Profile and Solution Aproach

IPv6 trends in Asia

  • 1. Issue Date: Revision: IPv6 in Asia: Laggards and Trends 11 July 2016 1 July 2016 Guangliang Pan
  • 2. IPv6 allocations How many allocations have been made by each RIR by year? 2
  • 3. Percentage of RIR members with IPv6 in each region 3
  • 4. Global IPv6 active BGP entries 4
  • 5. IPv6 capability, worldwide (weighted) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2013-10 2013-11 2013-12 2014-01 2014-02 2014-03 2014-04 2014-05 2014-06 2014-07 2014-08 2014-09 2014-10 2014-11 2014-12 2015-01 2015-02 2015-03 2015-04 2015-05 2015-06 2015-07 2015-08 2015-09 2015-10 2015-11 2015-12 2016-01 2016-02 2016-03 2016-04 2016-05 2016-06 %IPv6capable 5
  • 6. 6.5%? Google says 10+? • APNIC applies a weighting function to get the total measurements: – Based on ITU internet population data; to adjust for sample size anomalies worldwide • You can consider this worldwide figure as a low-side count – and the Google (and other) measures as a high-side count • It’s probably somewhere in between the two 6
  • 7. IPv6 capability, worldwide (weighted) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2013-10 2013-12 2014-02 2014-04 2014-06 2014-08 2014-10 2014-12 2015-02 2015-04 2015-06 2015-08 2015-10 2015-12 2016-02 2016-04 2016-06 %IPv6capable 7
  • 8. CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % BE 53.35% CH 29.49% US 29.02% DE 28.44% PT 28.33% GR 26.77% EE 19.34% PE 18.97% LU 17.63% JP 16.79% FI 16.76% MY 13.81% EU 12.94% FR 12.54% BR 10.86% GB 10.78% CA 10.35% NO 9.65% HT 9.50% NL 8.27% SG 8.23% RO 8.13% AT 7.26% CZ 6.21% CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6 % CC IPv6% IE 5.36% AU 4.82% HU 4.56% BO 4.35% SE 4.28% AX 4.05% SA 3.97% BA 3.71% NZ 3.03% PL 2.86% TR 2.30% HK 1.53% SI 1.51% LK 1.41% MT 1.34% RU 1.33% IN 1.30% KR 1.20% TT 0.96% BT 0.86% CW 0.77% BG 0.68% CN 0.51% VN 0.50% IT 0.49% UA 0.43% MD 0.40% DK 0.39% IL 0.36% TH 0.33% SD 0.27% BQ 0.23% SK 0.21% LV 0.21% ZA 0.21% LT 0.21% BW 0.17% GF 0.16% MK 0.12% TW 0.12% CL 0.12% ES 0.11% IS 0.11% ID 0.10% TZ 0.10% GT 0.10% PA 0.10% 8 Above and below the line
  • 9. IPv6 capable rate by economy 9
  • 10. Emerging problem in the AP region • Few economies in the AP region are above world-grade IPv6 capability (green) • Of the economies below the line, many are stagnant (red); some are moving upward (yellow) • Hard to quantify what quality determines ranking 10 It’s not just about economic size; diversity of the ISP Is it about capital investment, or other reasons?
  • 11. Two kinds of Internet? • IPv4 and IPv6 can’t directly interoperate as protocols – You can tunnel, and you can gateway but you can’t send IP packets directly from • 2000::/3 to 10.0.0.0/8 – The decision to proceed with IPv6 deployment implies dual-stack operations; short or long term – The decision to remain in IPv4 implies increasing use of CGN and other techniques to maximize address reuse 11 There is no avoidance of extra technology costs to continue to grow the Internet
  • 12. It looks like it on a macro scale • There are signs that at a high-level view, the economies investing in IPv6 are now diverging from the ones who are staying with IPv4 – It’s not just about size, or economic capacity • Let’s review some of the players in each ‘camp’ – Some economies with signs of significant IPv6 deployment – Some economies with little or no sign of significant IPv6 deployment 12
  • 13. IPv6 capability, worldwide (weighted) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2013-10 2013-11 2013-12 2014-01 2014-02 2014-03 2014-04 2014-05 2014-06 2014-07 2014-08 2014-09 2014-10 2014-11 2014-12 2015-01 2015-02 2015-03 2015-04 2015-05 2015-06 2015-07 2015-08 2015-09 2015-10 2015-11 2015-12 2016-01 2016-02 2016-03 2016-04 2016-05 2016-06 %IPv6capable 13
  • 14. High IPv6 capability in the Asia Pacific 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2011-10 2011-12 2012-02 2012-04 2012-06 2012-08 2012-10 2012-12 2013-02 2013-04 2013-06 2013-08 2013-10 2013-12 2014-02 2014-04 2014-06 2014-08 2014-10 2014-12 2015-02 2015-04 2015-06 2015-08 2015-10 2015-12 2016-02 2016-04 2016-06 %IPv6capable JP AU MY SG 14
  • 15. SK Telecom (Korea) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2011-10 2011-12 2012-02 2012-04 2012-06 2012-08 2012-10 2012-12 2013-02 2013-04 2013-06 2013-08 2013-10 2013-12 2014-02 2014-04 2014-06 2014-08 2014-10 2014-12 2015-02 2015-04 2015-06 2015-08 2015-10 2015-12 2016-02 2016-04 2016-06 %IPv6capable 15
  • 17. Softbank-BB, KDDI (Japan) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2011-10 2011-12 2012-02 2012-04 2012-06 2012-08 2012-10 2012-12 2013-02 2013-04 2013-06 2013-08 2013-10 2013-12 2014-02 2014-04 2014-06 2014-08 2014-10 2014-12 2015-02 2015-04 2015-06 2015-08 2015-10 2015-12 2016-02 2016-04 2016-06 %IPv6capable 17676 2516 17
  • 18. StarHub, StarHub CableVision (Singapore) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2011-10 2011-12 2012-02 2012-04 2012-06 2012-08 2012-10 2012-12 2013-02 2013-04 2013-06 2013-08 2013-10 2013-12 2014-02 2014-04 2014-06 2014-08 2014-10 2014-12 2015-02 2015-04 2015-06 2015-08 2015-10 2015-12 2016-02 2016-04 2016-06 %IPv6capable 55430 10091 18
  • 19. Telstra, Internode, Australia 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2011-10 2011-12 2012-02 2012-04 2012-06 2012-08 2012-10 2012-12 2013-02 2013-04 2013-06 2013-08 2013-10 2013-12 2014-02 2014-04 2014-06 2014-08 2014-10 2014-12 2015-02 2015-04 2015-06 2015-08 2015-10 2015-12 2016-02 2016-04 2016-06 %IPv6capable 1221 4739 19
  • 20. High IPv6 capability, selected economies worldwide 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2011-10 2011-12 2012-02 2012-04 2012-06 2012-08 2012-10 2012-12 2013-02 2013-04 2013-06 2013-08 2013-10 2013-12 2014-02 2014-04 2014-06 2014-08 2014-10 2014-12 2015-02 2015-04 2015-06 2015-08 2015-10 2015-12 2016-02 2016-04 2016-06 %IPv6capable US GB DE BE EC BR 20
  • 21. Top 10 by sample, US ASN AS name IPv6 capable IPv6 preferred # Samples AS7922 Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. 61.75% 57.28% 14304843 AS7018 ATT-INTERNET4 - ATT Services, Inc. 80.57% 73.20% 8526953 AS8075 Microsoft Corporation 0.00% 0.00% 5325116 AS701 Verizon Business 0.14% 0.01% 4728691 AS20115 Charter Communications 0.10% 0.02% 3463344 AS22773 Cox Communications Inc. 17.46% 16.15% 3164061 AS22394 Verizon Wireless 89.70% 80.89% 2621733 AS209 Qwest Communications Company 0.17% 0.10% 2432793 AS20057 ATT Mobility 9.50% 9.32% 2410034 AS10796 Time Warner Cable Internet 23.30% 21.79% 1999827 21
  • 22. Top 10 by sample, BE ASN AS name IPv6 capable IPv6 preferred # Samples AS5432 BELGACOM-SKYNET-AS Proximus NV 44.06% 42.09% 958021 AS6848 TELENET-AS Telenet N.V. 71.09% 67.94% 879004 AS12392 ASBRUTELE Brutele SC 72.96% 70.51% 237980 AS47377 MES Mobistar SA 0.20% 0.05% 56730 AS21502 Numericable S.A. 0.01% 0.01% 48287 AS2611 BELNET BELNET 13.39% 12.44% 25361 AS44944 BASE-AS BASE Company NVSA 0.45% 0.16% 22518 AS29587 SCHEDOM-AS schedom vof 0.00% 0.00% 9654 AS41756 Orascom Telecom Algeria Spa 0.00% 0.00% 8245 AS51964 ORANGE-BUSINESS- SERVICES-IPSN 0.00% 0.00% 7811 22
  • 23. Top 10 by Samples, GB ASN AS name IPv6 capable IPv6 preferred # Samples AS5607 Sky UK Limited 51.06% 49.36% 798472 AS5089 NTL Virgin Media Limited 0.01% 0.01% 739599 AS43766 MTC-KSA-AS MTC KSA 0.00% 0.00% 676236 AS2856 British Telecommunications PLC 0.26% 0.24% 658706 AS13285 TalkTalk Communications Limited 0.00% 0.00% 173033 AS12576 ORANGE-PCS EE Limited 0.10% 0.05% 154985 AS9105 TISCALI-UK Tiscali UK Limited 0.00% 0.00% 153678 AS9009 M247 M247 Ltd 0.06% 0.02% 142583 AS60339 H3GUK Hutchison 3G UK Limited 0.09% 0.03% 97854 AS34825 ONAVO Onavo Mobile Ltd 0.01% 0.00% 90392 23
  • 24. Top 10 by Samples, DE ASN AS name IPv6 capable IPv6 preferred # Samples AS3320 DTAG Deutsche Telekom AG 50.24% 48.39% 256677 AS200185 XANDMAIL-ASN X AND MAIL SA 0.00% 0.00% 115142 AS3209 VODANET Vodafone GmbH 0.15% 0.07% 81574 AS24940 HETZNER-AS Hetzner Online GmbH 5.86% 4.78% 65769 AS28753 Leaseweb Deutschland GmbH 39.91% 0.71% 61988 AS31334 Vodafone Kabel Deutschland GmbH 69.06% 65.82% 59817 AS6805 Telefonica Germany GmbH Co.OHG 0.41% 0.33% 52396 AS6830 Liberty Global Operations B.V. 58.68% 55.50% 40648 AS8972 PLUSSERVER-AS PlusServer AG 0.81% 0.05% 25969 AS29562 KABELBW-ASN Kabel BW GmbH 56.36% 53.48% 23299 24
  • 25. Top 10 by samples BR ASN AS Name IPv6 Capable IPv6 Preferred # Samples AS28573 CLARO S.A. 22.60% 20.60% 1354868 AS18881 Global Village Telecom 21.89% 20.73% 892808 AS7738 Telemar Norte Leste S.A. 3.84% 3.68% 575631 AS27699 TELEFNICA BRASIL S.A 2.26% 2.10% 419031 AS8167 Brasil Telecom SA - 2.46% 2.39% 339728 AS26615 Tim Celular S.A. 4.71% 4.60% 104354 AS26599 TELEFNICA BRASIL S.A 13.51% 13.12% 102621 AS53006 ALGAR TELECOM SA 0.05% 0.05% 62938 AS14868 COPEL Telecom S.A. 22.30% 21.73% 44573 AS22085 Claro SA 0.19% 0.04% 40324 25
  • 26. Top 10 by samples, EC ASN AS Name IPv6 Capable IPv6 Preferred # Samples AS14420 CNT EP 45.13% 43.66% 1582536 AS14522 Satnet 0.00% 0.00% 438480 AS27947 Telconet S.A 0.03% 0.03% 424395 AS27738 Ecuadortelecom S.A. 0.00% 0.00% 278140 AS23487 CONECEL 0.02% 0.01% 157551 AS19114 Otecel S.A. 0.03% 0.01% 155074 AS52257 Telconet S.A 0.01% 0.00% 135138 AS27668 ETAPA EP 0.00% 0.00% 126933 AS22724 PUNTONET S.A. 0.01% 0.01% 110372 AS28006 CNT EP 0.02% 0.01% 42226 26
  • 27. Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2011-10 2011-12 2012-02 2012-04 2012-06 2012-08 2012-10 2012-12 2013-02 2013-04 2013-06 2013-08 2013-10 2013-12 2014-02 2014-04 2014-06 2014-08 2014-10 2014-12 2015-02 2015-04 2015-06 2015-08 2015-10 2015-12 2016-02 2016-04 2016-06 %IPv6capable 7922 22394 7018 21928 27
  • 29. What we know about China 1,382,013,910 people 692,388,968 Internet users 50% penetration 1,273 ASes 10.35T GDP IPv4 316 in BGP 337,887,232 addresses 0.24 per head 88% visible IPv6 55 in BGP 89,167,817 M addresses 64,520 per head 1% visible 1% capability 29
  • 30. Top 10 by samples, China ASN AS Name IPv6 Capable IPv6 Preferred # Samples AS4134 CHINANET-BACKBONE 0.42% 0.24% 12628000 AS4837 CHINA169-BACKBONE CNCGROUP 0.21% 0.15% 9910451 AS9808 Guangdong Mobile Communication 0.09% 0.03% 2006643 AS4812 CHINANET-SH-AP China Telecom 0.17% 0.07% 1632577 AS4808 CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP network 1.12% 0.77% 1166552 AS56046 CMNET-JIANGSU-AP China Mobile 0.07% 0.01% 779374 AS56041 CMNET-ZHEJIANG-AP China Mobile 0.05% 0.00% 720916 AS24547 Hebei Mobile Communication 0.03% 0.00% 698409 AS17816 China Unicom IP network 0.27% 0.19% 479682 AS23724 China Telecommunications 0.14% 0.01% 317333 30
  • 31. Top 10 IPv6 capability, China ASN AS Name IPv6 Capable IPv6 Preferred # Samples AS23910 China Next Generation Internet 98.43% 92.52% 508 AS109 CISCOSYSTEMS - Cisco Systems, Inc. 73.08% 66.59% 416 AS4538 China Ed. and Research Network 25.05% 18.81% 186951 AS7497 Computer Network Information 23.73% 22.28% 18295 AS18240 Bitone United Networks Technology 8.12% 5.65% 15153 AS4809 China Telecom Next Generation 7.38% 5.48% 16227 AS56040 China Mobile communications 6.81% 3.83% 73891 AS38019 Mobile Communication Company 3.30% 2.38% 13318 AS58466 CHINANET Guangdong province 2.79% 0.00% 11758 AS4847 China Networks Inter-Exchange 2.63% 1.99% 184230 31
  • 32. AS numbers announcing IPv4 and IPv6 in China 32
  • 33. So: is this an address distribution problem?
  • 34. No! This isn’t a distribution problem • Lets look at some history – Growth in distinct INR holders by economy over time – Amount of IPv4, IPv6 by INR holder count by economy over time • What kinds of trend do we see?
  • 35. IPv4 by economy by holder, various economies
  • 36. IPv4 by economy by holder, various economies Forms A group
  • 37. IPv4 by economy by holder China CN is above average
  • 38. IPv6 by economy by holder, various economies
  • 39. IPv6 by economy by holder, various economies Forms A group
  • 40. IPv6 by economy by holder China compared to Mean CN is above average
  • 41. IPv6 by economy by holder China, compared to IPv4 Significantly More space per INR holder
  • 42. It’s not an allocation problem • Its clear that The RIR system and CNNIC in particular has performed VERY WELL in maintaining equitable access to INR – CN INR holders hold more than the average – CN INR holders have significantly more IPv6 holdings per end-site, than they have IPv4 per customer/user • There is no doubt we’ve done our job! – But there is still much to do, encouraging IPv6 • The problem is a deployment problem not an allocation problem
  • 43. IPv4 addresses delegations worldwide In terms of /8s, how much space did each RIR issue by year? 43
  • 44. Available IPv4 /8s in each RIR 44
  • 45. IPv6 Address Delegations to China (Number of delegations by year) 45 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
  • 46. Suggestions • Have your IPv6 development plan ready NOW not later • Apply for your IPv6 addresses if you have not done so – APNIC direct Members: One Click via MyAPNIC – CNNIC members: Apply via CNNIC • Send technical staff to IPv6 training • Deploy your IPv6 network • Provide IPv6 services to your customers 46
  • 47. Acknowledgement • Many thanks to the APNIC Research Team - Geoff Huston, George Michaelson and Byron Ellacott for their useful measurement data and great support to prepare this presentation! • For more information, please visit: »http://labs.apnic.net/ 47
  • 48. Share your IPv6 stories • APNIC Blog – https://blog.apnic.net/ • IPv6 Deployment Survey – http://survey.consulintel.es/index.php/175122 48

Editor's Notes

  • #34: So I want to explore if this is a problem in any sense, we can see in the address distribution function. Is this something in our core mission we’ve got wrong?
  • #35: What I’ve done is to examine the history of how membership and address assignment has gone, and how we stack up in IPv4 and IPv6 in terms of access to resources.
  • #36: Here you can see a sample of economies worldwide, and the calculated average for all economies. The graph is the amount of IPv4 per holder. And it has formed a group at between 10,000 and around 1,000,000 Ips per holder. That’s two decimal orders of magnitude difference. If you’re on the low side, you have a significant disadvantage on these numbers
  • #37: Here you can see a sample of economies worldwide, and the calculated average for all economies. The graph is the amount of IPv4 per holder. And it has formed a group at between 10,000 and around 1,000,000 Ips per holder. That’s two decimal orders of magnitude difference. If you’re on the low side, you have a significant disadvantage on these numbers
  • #38: Well.. China isn’t on the low side. You did a very good job of IPv4 distribution, and its equitably come out that CN on average has above the mean worldwide. You are still facing the problem of only 100,000 Ips per holder, so there is a real issue here in the face of IoT and multiple always on devices.
  • #39: SO now lets look in IPv6. And again, it forms a group
  • #40: SO now lets look in IPv6. And again, it forms a group
  • #41: And again, China is in the lucky position of being above average. You have a significant advantage here, in terms of how much IPv6 is already distributed.
  • #42: So finally for this comparison, if you look at the older history in V4, its clear China has done well: the historical allocations were well managed, and the new IPv6 allocations have been well managed. You guys did ok!
  • #43: So, this isnt an allocation problem. Its not about access, its about deployment. Its about who is using the IPs
  • #50: Survey closes 5 August. Four opportunities to win prizes of an Apple Watch Sport or a Microsoft Surface Pro 4.