URBACT Summer University 2013 - Labs - Low Carbon Transition - Session 4
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes632 views
This document provides an overview of Session 4 of the URBACT Lab. It discusses: 1. Checking the coherence of the Local Action Plan (LAP) developed in previous sessions to ensure problems, actions, and expected results align logically. 2. Introducing a self-assessment tool to evaluate the LAP and progress. 3. Explaining an upcoming "Dragons' Den" style presentation where each group will pitch their LAP to receive feedback from other attendees. The session aims to finalize the LAPs before the end of the lab and prepare participants to monitor and assess progress in implementation.
URBACT Summer University 2013 - Labs - Low Carbon Transition - Session 4
- 1. URBACT LAB SESSION 4 Final Check
- 2. LAB 4 – FINAL CHECK URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 2 1. Feedback from the ULSG @ work 3 2. Checking coherence of the LAP 3. Thinking ahead about monitoring 4. Introducing the URBACT self-assessment tool 5. Explaining the “Dragons den”
- 3. LAB 4 – FINAL CHECK URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 3 1. Feedback from the ULSG @ work 3 2. Checking coherence of the LAP 3. Thinking ahead about monitoring 4. Introducing the URBACT self-assessment tool 5. Explaining the “Dragons den”
- 4. LAB 4 – FINAL CHECK URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 4 1. Feedback from the ULSG @ work 3 2. Checking coherence of the LAP 3. Thinking ahead about monitoring 4. Introducing the URBACT self-assessment tool 5. Explaining the “Dragons den”
- 5. WHERE ARE WE IN PLANNING CYCLE MODEL? URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 1 5 Problems Stakeholders Evidence Results Ideas Actions Resources Check Consultation Launch Problems Stakeholders Evidence Results Ideas Actions Resources Check Consultation Launch
- 6. COHERENCE OF LAP • WHY check? • WHEN check? • HOW to check… URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 6
- 7. COHERENCE OF LAP URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 7 1. 2. Expected results Problems – Needs - Opportunities 4. Results CHECK Do expected results correspond to problem? CHECK: Do action supports achievement of objective? CHECK: Do Actions contribute to achievement of results? CHECK: Do Result contribute to solve problem/address stakeholder needs? 3. Actions
- 8. 360 DEGREE COHERENCE OF LAP URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 8 Check Results Actions Sustainable and integrated social are there …? are there …? environmental are there …? are there …? economic are there …? are there …? cross-sectoral cross-thematic are there …? are there …?
- 9. COHERENCE OF LAP 1. Example where coherence was improved after checking Intended results: Expansion of space capacity for mayor functions • Housing by 10.000 m² • Hotels by 5.000 m² • Social infrastructure by 3.000 m² Conflict: Through checking it was realized that only 15.000 m² are available. Solution: Definition of a process to coordinate which function at which location is to be realized best and monitoring that the intended results per function are not exceeded. URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 9
- 10. COHERENCE OF LAP Exercise: 30 minutes In ULSG groups (staying in this lab room) check your Action Table and portfolio using the 2 tools. Deliverable: adjust plan if necessary URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 10
- 11. LAB 4 – FINAL CHECK URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 11 1. Feedback from the ULSG @ work 3 2. Checking coherence of the LAP 3. Thinking ahead about monitoring 4. Introducing the URBACT self-assessment tool 5. Explaining the “Dragons den”
- 12. PROJECT MONITORING URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 12
- 13. GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF MONITORING 1. Observing and analysing 2. Reviewing the performance- output achievement 3. Providing information to the general public and giving advisory services 4. Supporting evidence based decision making and taking corrective actions URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 13
- 14. THE URBACT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOLS URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 14
- 15. LAB 4 – FINAL CHECK URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 15 1. Feedback from the ULSG @ work 3 2. Checking coherence of the LAP 3. Thinking ahead about monitoring 4. Introducing the URBACT self-assessment tool 5. Explaining the “Dragons den”
- 16. THE URBACT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOLS: ULSG ULSG Main Headings: Frequency of meetings Organisation of ULSG Diversity of members Participation of residents, users, business… Empowerment of users, citizens Other voices Involvement of managing Authorities Leadership Animation and structure of meetings URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 16
- 17. THE URBACT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOLS: ULSG URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 17 Local Action Plan Network Completed by Instructions Indicators Score awarded out of 5 Evidence for score - why was the score given - Indications for scoring Frequency of meetings 0 score 1: LSG has few meetings (e.g. One per year) score 3: Regular meetings, no info on participation score 5: Regular and frequent meetings with high level of participation, links to meeting notes Organisation of LSG 0 score 1: not enough time, part of another meeting score 3: More time, but not well organised score 5: Enough time, well organised Diversity of LSG membership 0 score 1: ULSG dominated by public officials from municpality score 3: ULSG mostly public officials but other agencies involved score 5: Involvement of all three sectors, (public, private, civil society) Participation of residents, users of service or businesses 0 score 1: No effort made to consult with users or residents (or businesses) score 3: Some efforts are made to consult score 5: Either full involvement of users/residents/businesses in LSG meetings or specific meetings held to engage them For each indicator (row) complete the score column by entering a score between 1 and 5 where 1 is weak and 5 is strong. You can use the score criteria on the right to see what score to give.Complete the evidence column for each indicator. GOVERNANCE & DECISION MAKING Self- assessment tool for URBACT Local Support Groups put name of your city here put network name here put your name here
- 18. THE URBACT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL: ULSG URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 18
- 19. THE URBACT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL: LAP URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 19 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Process and governance Content of action plan Integrated approach Finance and project planning EU and URBACT added value
- 20. LAB 4 – FINAL CHECK URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 20 1. Feedback from the ULSG @ work 3 2. Checking coherence of the LAP 3. Thinking ahead about monitoring 4. Introducing the URBACT self-assessment tool 5. Explaining the “Dragons den”
- 21. PITCHING THE LOCAL ACTION PLANS IN LAB 5 URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 21
- 22. THE PRESENTATION • Each ULSG @work group selects 1-2 people to present the LAP in 5 minutes • The presenters can use 3 pp slides, flipchart, other media • The presentation focuses on the action table developed in Lab 3, and makes use of/reference to all portfolio materials • The presentation will be delivered to a panel of 4 representatives (1 from each of the other ULSG @work groups) and the Deputy Mayor in front of all Lab members URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 22
- 23. THE LAP PORTFOLIO • Lab 1 Problem Tree Validated Stakeholder List • Lab 2 Expected Results Evidence Enhancement Table • Lab 3 Action table • Lab 4 Presentation URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 23
- 24. CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS (SCORE EACH CRITERION FROM 1 TO 5) URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 24 Criteria Score 1. Coherence between problem, actions and results 2. Addressing the deputy mayor’s challenge 3. Feasibility 4. Integrated approach 5. Quality of presentation Total
- 25. THE PANEL • Each ULSG @work group selects one panel member (different to the LAP presenters) • Each panel member is given a role (managing authorities, private enterprises/funders, local residents...) • They listen to the presentation (5 min) • They ask questions (5 min) from the perspective of their particular role • Questions can be asked from the floor (whole Lab group) URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 25
- 26. ULSG@WORK 4 • Time • Objective: Prepare pitch • Tasks: to prepare to pitch • Tool: Portfolio+ 3 slides (written) + ???? • Deliverables: • Dragons Den pitch • 1 slide Unique Selling Proposition at lunchtime URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 26
- 27. FINAL REFLECTIONS • What have you learnt? • What will you do differently in future? URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 27
- 28. URBACT LAB 1 SESSION 4 28