SlideShare a Scribd company logo
DIPLOMA IN WOOD INDUSTRY


              FINAL YEAR REPORT
                   WTE 375


PARTICLEBOARD FROM OIL
      PALM FROND
NORHALIMAHTUS SAADIAH BINTI RAZALI (2009445966)
   NOOR AIN BINTI MOHD HAZAN (20094842772)
     IZZAH AZIMAH BINTI NOH (2009482646)
INTRODUCTION
PARTICLEBOARD
 panel product made by compressing small particle of wood while simultaneously
bonding them with an adhesive.
  first made in Germany in1940.
 nine types of board that are:
                     1. chips
                     2. flake
                     3. wafer
                     4. sawdust
                     5. excelsior
                     6. sliver
                     7. strand
                     8. shaving
                     9. fiber
  Particleboard can be choose to undergo either flat press or extruded press but the
most popular is flat press.
S




PECIES : OIL PALM FROND
SOURCE : UITM AGRICULTURE FARM
REASON : TO REDUCE WASTE OF OIL PALM
PROPERTIES OF PARTICLEBOARD
CHARACTERISTIC OF PARTICLEBOARD
• cheaper
• denser
• More uniform that conventional wood and
plywood
• is substituted for them when appearance
• strength are less important than cost
•The strength of the board will depend on;
        - density
        - thickness
        - layered
        - graded structure
        - adhesive
MATERIAL
• Particle come out with different sizes by using
screening machine
• wood species is oil palm
• particle sizes as a parameter:
           - 1.0 mm
           - 2.0 mm




• resin that use in producing the particleboard is
phenol formaldehyde.
• using different concentration as a parameter:
           - 7%
           - 9%
           -11%
MACHINE
•CHIPPER
 to chip large pieces of wood




• FLAKER
for cutting into desired sizes flakes from chips as
well as sliced bamboo and crushed veneer




•SCREENING
screening the flake into differences size
•OVEN
for reducing the moisture content of flake




•BALANCE
 balancing weight of PF and also balancing
weight of particle
•PARTICLEBOARD MIXER
for mixing the particle with resin




•COLD PRESS
for reducing the thickness of particle board and
consolidate the resin




•HOT PRESS
for heating and curing the resin
•ARM SAW
for trimming the edge of particle board

•TABLE SAW
To cut the particleboard for testing




•INSTRON (TESTING MACHINE)
For test the bending and internal bonding
PARICLEBOARD CALCULATION
PARTICLE BOARD CALCULATION
   for 7% phenol formaldehyde
1. Calculate total materials required per board
Target density = 600kg/m³
Thickness      = 12mm
Length x width = 35mm x 35mm

Material required per board
  = Length x Width x Thickness x Density
  = 35cm x 35cm x 1.2cm³ x 0.6g/cm³
  = 882g (at ± 10% equivalence Moisture Content)
  =801.8g (at oven died weight)
2. Calculated resin required
   Resin content = 7%
   Solid content of resin = 40.2% (as given as
   supplier)

   Amount of liquid resin required =
   [ RS/SC x Wt. per board ]+ 5%
               = (0.09/0.402 x 801.8) + 5%
               = 146.58g
3. Calculated equivalence resin content

Equivalent resin content= Liquid resin x solid content
                = 139.6 x 0.402
                = 56.12g
4. Calculate oven-dried weight of wood flakes

   Wood flakes (O/D wt.)= Material wt. – resin wt.
               = 801.8g – 56.12g
               = 745.68g
5. Calculation air-dried weight of wood required
   M.C of wood = 3%

Wood (A/D wt.)= [ Wood (O/D) x (1 + MC/100) ] + 5%
              = 745.68 x 1.03 + 5%
              = 806.45g
PARTICLE BOARD CALCULATION for
    9% phenol formaldehyde
Material required per board
= Length x Width x Thickness x Density
= 35cm x 35cm x 1.02cm³ x 0.6g/cm³

= 882g (at ± 10% equivalence Moisture Content)
=801.8g (at oven died weight)
2. Calculated resin required
       Resin content       = 9%
       Solid content of resin   = 40.2% (as given as
       supplier)

   Amount of liquid resin required
   = [ RS/SC x Wt. per board ]+ 5%
               = (0.09/0.402 x 801.8) + 5%
               = 188.48g
3. Calculated equivalence resin content
   Equivalent resin content
   = Liquid resin x solid content
                = 179.51 x 0.402
                = 72.16g
4. Calculate oven-dried weight of wood flakes

   Wood flakes (O/D wt.)= Material wt. – resin wt.
               = 801.8g – 72.16g
               = 729.64g
5. Calculation air-dried weight of wood required
   M.C of wood = 3%

   Wood (A/D wt.)
   = [ Wood (O/D) x (1 + MC/100) ] + 5%
              = 729.64 x 1.03 + 5%
              = 789.11g
PARTICLE BOARD CALCULATION for
   11% phenol formaldehyde
1. Calculate total materials required per board
Target density = 600kg/m³
Thickness       = 12mm
Length x width = 35mm x 35mm

Material required per board
= Length x Width x Thickness x Density
= 35cm x 35cm x 1.2cm³ x 0.6g/cm³
= 882g (at ± 10% equivalence Moisture Content)
=801.8g (at oven died weight)
2. Calculated resin required
   Resin content = 11%
   Solid content of resin = 40.2% (as given as
   supplier)

   Amount of liquid resin required
   = [ RS/SC x Wt. per board ]+ 5%
   = (0.11/ 0.402 x 801.8) + 5%
   = 230.37g
3. Calculated equivalence resin content
Equivalent resin content = Liquid resin x solid content
                = 219.40 x 0.402
                = 88.20g
4. Calculate oven-dried weight of wood flakes
Wood flakes (O/D wt.) = Material wt. – resin wt.
                = 801.8g – 88.20g
                = 713.6g
5. Calculation air-dried weight of wood required
   M.C of wood = 3%

Wood (A/D wt.)= [ Wood (O/D) x (1 + MC/100) ] + 5%
              = 713.6 x 1.03 + 5%
              = 771.76g
PARTICLEBOARD MANUFACTURING
Frond cleaning
 Oil palm tree                      Oil palm frond
                     process




Flaking process    Wood chip       Chipping process
Particle base on
 Wood flakes       screening process
                                             sizes




Weight the resin   weighing process       Oven dry
Matt forming
 Mixing process                    Cold press
                     process




Trimming process   particleboard   Hot press
Marking for testing   Cutting for testing   Measure the width




Thickness swelling                             Weight the
                      Measure the length
     testing                                  particleboard
Testing




Bending testing   Internal Bonding   Thickness Swelling
                       testing             testing
TESTING
MALAYSIAN   STANDARD TESTING
BENDING     : MS1787 :PART 10     :2005
IB          : MS1787 :PART 11     :2005
TS          : MS1787 :PART 6      :2005


       MOE       MOR       IB        TS


      >2000       >14     >0.45      <12
PARTICLEBOARD CUTTING SECTION FOR TESTING

•MOE
measure the resistance to bending
related to stiffness of a beam                         MOE/MOR 1


•MOR                                                   MOE / MOR 2
The index of the ultimate breaking   IB1   TS1   IB2      TS2        IB3   TS3   IB4
strength when loaded as a simple
beam                                                   MOE / MOR 3
                                     TS4   IB5   TS5       IB6     TS6     IB7   TS7
•IB
for measure the mechanical
properties of the particle board.                      MOE / MOR 4



•TS
measurement of the physical
properties of particleboard
BENDING TESTING   This testing is for measure the
                  mechanical properties of the particle
                  board.

                  Usually, this testing is for measure
                  the Modulus of Rupture (MOR) and
                  Modulus of Elasticity (MOE)

                  From this testing we can know the
                  mode of failure from testing as well as
                  for structural application requiring
                  strength and rigidity

                  For this particleboard, the testing for
                  the sample is important to determine
                  the characteristics for overall samples.
INTERNAL BONDING
                   An overall measure of the board’s
                   integrity that defines how well the
                   core material is bonded together.

                    In the standard test for IB,
                   dimension of 50mm x 50mm piece of
                   particleboard is pulled apart with
                   tension applied perpendicularly to
                   both faces.

                   IB is influence directly by board
                   density, resin content, particle
                   geometry and raw material type.
THICKNESS SWELLING
                     These types of testing usually for
                     measurement of the physical
                     properties of particleboard.

                     The Thickness Swelling and Water
                     Absorption test we soaked the sample
                     to the water.

                     Before we soaked the sample to the
                     water we must take the weight for
                     Water Absorption testing and the
                     length and diameter for Thickness
                     Swelling testing.
RESULT
GRAPH OF 1.0 MM SIZE PARTICLE
GRAPH MOR 1.0 mm
                    MOR
                 Mean     Standard
                                         17.44

                                             14
                     12.21
    10.02




7% resin cont.   9% resin cont.      11% resin cont.
GRAPH MOE 1.0 mm

                    MOE
                 Mean     Standard
                                        2306.43
                                             2000
                   1721.91
  1460.98



7% resin cont.   9% resin cont.      11% resin cont.
GRAPH IB 1.0mm
                        IB
                 Mean          Standard



                                               1.97

                        1.28
    1.12
                                                  0.45


7% resin cont.   9% resin cont.           11% resin cont.
GRAPH TS 1.0mm
            Percentage of Thickness Swelling
                   Percent (%)    Standard



    24.53
                          22.12
                                                     16.03

                                                    12




7% resin cont.        9% resin cont.         11% resin cont.
GRAPH WA 1.0mm
            Percentage of Water Absorbtion
                             Percent (%)

   133.44
                    118.92
                                     102.51




7% resin cont.   9% resin cont. 11% resin cont.
GRAPH OF 2.0MM SIZE PARTICLE
GRAPH MOR 2.0mm
                              MOR
                         Mean     Standard
                                      18.38


                                           14

                     12.6
   10.91




7% resin cont.   9% resin cont.   11% resin cont.
GRAPH MOE 2.0mm
                             MOE
                        Mean       Standard



                                     2507.96
                                          2000

  1666.99          1771.35




7% resin cont.   9% resin cont.   11% resin cont.
GRAPH IB 2.0mm
                                  IB
                         Mean          Standard


                                               1.35


                     0.70
   0.69

                                               0.45




7% resin cont.   9% resin cont.        11% resin cont.
GRAPH WA 2.0mm
                 Percentage of Water Absorbtion
                               Percent (%)


        119.76

                           116.95


                                             112.87




7% resin cont.     9% resin cont.   11% resin cont.
DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN
   2.0 MM AND 1.0MM
Differentiation MOR between Particle 1.0mm and
                            2.0mm
                                           18.38

                                                   17.44
                   12.21
                                               14
10.91
                       12.6
    10.02




 7% resin cont.   9% resin cont.      11% resin cont.
                    1.0mm          2.0mm      Standard
Differentiation MOE between Particle 1.0mm and
                              2.0mm
                                             2507.96

                      1771.35                     2306.43
1666.99                                          2000

                       1721.91
  1460.98




 7% resin cont.     9% resin cont.      11% resin cont.
                      1.0mm          2.0mm      Standard
Differentiation IB between Particle 1.0mm and 2.0mm

                                         1.97



                      1.28
  1.12
                                                1.35



0.69                      0.70
                                                0.45



7% resin cont.     9% resin cont.     11% resin cont.
                    1.0mm         2.0mm       Standard
Differantiation Percentage Thickness Swelling
              between Particle 1.0mm and 2.0mm
    31.73


                     23.46

                                           19.18

   24.53          22.12
                                              16.03
                                             12




7% resin cont.   9% resin cont.      11% resin cont.
                   1.0mm          2.0mm    Standard
Differentiation Percentage Water Absorption Particle
                     1.0mm and 2.0mm
                          1.0mm    2.0mm
  119.76           118.92
                                      112.87
    133.44
                    116.95
                                      102.51




7% resin cont.   9% resin cont.   11% resin cont.
RESULT SUMMARY
SAMPLES     MOE      MOR      IB      TS      WA
    A
 1.0mm     1460.98   10.02   1.12    24.53   133.44
  7%pf
    B
 1.0mm     1721.91   12.21   1.28    22.12   118.92
  9%pf
    C
 1.0mm     2306.43   17.44   1.97    16.03   102.51
  11%
    D
 2.0mm     1666.99   10.01   0.69    31.73   119.76
  7%pf
    E
 2.0mm     1771.35   12.60   0.70    23.46   116.95
  9%pf
    F
 2.0mm     2507.96   18.38   1.35    19.18   11.87
 11%pf
STANDARD   >2000     >14     >0.45   <12       -
DISCUSSION
PARTICLEBOARD EXPERIMENT
MYSTAT ANALYSIS
MOE
Sources         p-value
  Size           0.139
 Resin           0.000
MOR
Sources         p-value
  Size           0.483
 Resin           0.000
IB
Sources        p-value
  Size          0.000
 Resin          0.000
TS
Sources        p-value
  Size          0.000
 Resin          0.000
CONCLUSION
• The bigger size of particle the better of MOE
  and MOR.
• The smaller size of particle the better IB and
  Thickness Swelling.

More Related Content

PPTX
wood polymer composite
PPTX
FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS by sairam
PDF
FIBERGLASS PPT..pdf
PPTX
basalt rock fibre
DOCX
Report on polymer use in civil engineerinng
PPT
Frp materials
PPTX
Fiber manufacturing
wood polymer composite
FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS by sairam
FIBERGLASS PPT..pdf
basalt rock fibre
Report on polymer use in civil engineerinng
Frp materials
Fiber manufacturing

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Presentation FYP/TESIS : Properties Of Particleboard From Acacia Species Usin...
PDF
Sieve Analysis of Fine & Coarse Aggregate | Jameel Academy
PDF
Setting time test
PPT
Block 11 blending gradations 13
PDF
Sieve analysis of fine aggregates student experiment
DOCX
Sieving Final Report
PPTX
Applications of geotextiles
PPTX
PPTX
Wood Basics - Lunch & Learn
PPT
Timber ppt-1
PPTX
OSB & WOOD COMPOSITES
PPTX
Sieve analysis test report
DOCX
Sieve analysis of coarse and fine aggregate - Report
PPTX
Plywood manufacturing types uses
PPT
Lect 18-conventional asphalt mix design
PDF
Fibre Reinforced Soil
PPTX
Materials powerpoint
PPTX
influence of sand grading on strength and durability of mortar.
DOCX
8. chapter 3
Presentation FYP/TESIS : Properties Of Particleboard From Acacia Species Usin...
Sieve Analysis of Fine & Coarse Aggregate | Jameel Academy
Setting time test
Block 11 blending gradations 13
Sieve analysis of fine aggregates student experiment
Sieving Final Report
Applications of geotextiles
Wood Basics - Lunch & Learn
Timber ppt-1
OSB & WOOD COMPOSITES
Sieve analysis test report
Sieve analysis of coarse and fine aggregate - Report
Plywood manufacturing types uses
Lect 18-conventional asphalt mix design
Fibre Reinforced Soil
Materials powerpoint
influence of sand grading on strength and durability of mortar.
8. chapter 3
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Medium density fiberboard (mdf)
PPTX
PPTX
Proposal FYP degree : Evaluating The Properties of Particleboard From Acacia ...
PPTX
Timber - A Construction Material
PPTX
Commercializing kenaf core particleboard properties
PDF
Nutmeg and Betel Nut
PDF
poster bioborneo 2014
PDF
Presentatie Daan Roosegaarde tijdens Dutch Design Week 2015: Verwonderen, kop...
PDF
Low impact material technical data sheet wood fibre board
PPTX
Specifications of Wood
PDF
Presentation For APOC 2015
PPTX
specification of Stone
PPTX
Specification of glass
PPTX
Tvt plywood manufacturing process
PDF
UAV-IQ Precision Agriculture Service Introduction
PPTX
PPTX
Palm oil, killer of all of us - #SciChallenge2017
PPTX
stone ppt
PDF
Symfony簡介
PPTX
The marketing environment
Medium density fiberboard (mdf)
Proposal FYP degree : Evaluating The Properties of Particleboard From Acacia ...
Timber - A Construction Material
Commercializing kenaf core particleboard properties
Nutmeg and Betel Nut
poster bioborneo 2014
Presentatie Daan Roosegaarde tijdens Dutch Design Week 2015: Verwonderen, kop...
Low impact material technical data sheet wood fibre board
Specifications of Wood
Presentation For APOC 2015
specification of Stone
Specification of glass
Tvt plywood manufacturing process
UAV-IQ Precision Agriculture Service Introduction
Palm oil, killer of all of us - #SciChallenge2017
stone ppt
Symfony簡介
The marketing environment
Ad

Similar to PARTICLEBOARD EXPERIMENT (20)

DOCX
12. appendices
DOCX
4. list of figure
PDF
Different types of boards
PPTX
Fabrication of Particle Board from Indigenous Agricultural & Household Wastes
PPTX
Viva vorce izreen farah
PDF
Comparative Studies on Physico-Mechanical Properties of Wood Plastic Composit...
PPTX
Composite wood and Adhesives
PDF
Fabrication of Particle Boards From Rice Husk
DOCX
6. chapter 1
DOCX
Wood cement board
PDF
Session 29 ic2011 schwarzkopf
PPT
Engineered Wood Presentation
PPTX
Wood derivatives_plywood_blockboard_mdf board_partition board
PPTX
[Metropolia Student Project Seminar 24.5.] Innovative Building Materials
PDF
Araldite Catálogo Obomodulan Antala Industria (Spain).
PDF
Session 3 ic2011 migneault
PPTX
Fiber board and Particle Board
DOCX
3. table of content
PPTX
Basic_Manufacturing_Processes LECTURE 02
PPTX
Basic_Manufacturing_Processes LECTURE 02
12. appendices
4. list of figure
Different types of boards
Fabrication of Particle Board from Indigenous Agricultural & Household Wastes
Viva vorce izreen farah
Comparative Studies on Physico-Mechanical Properties of Wood Plastic Composit...
Composite wood and Adhesives
Fabrication of Particle Boards From Rice Husk
6. chapter 1
Wood cement board
Session 29 ic2011 schwarzkopf
Engineered Wood Presentation
Wood derivatives_plywood_blockboard_mdf board_partition board
[Metropolia Student Project Seminar 24.5.] Innovative Building Materials
Araldite Catálogo Obomodulan Antala Industria (Spain).
Session 3 ic2011 migneault
Fiber board and Particle Board
3. table of content
Basic_Manufacturing_Processes LECTURE 02
Basic_Manufacturing_Processes LECTURE 02

More from Izzah Noah (20)

PPTX
Negative impacts of formaldehyde release from furniture made
PPTX
Standard plank for wood lamination on khaya ivorensis
PPTX
Cara cara untuk memohon melanjutkan pelajaran ke peringkat sarjana(master
PDF
My Passion
DOCX
Mechanism of adhesion
DOCX
Lab report adherend
PPTX
Plywood
DOCX
Q&A about quality control management
DOC
resume draft sheet
DOCX
13. vita
DOCX
11. references
DOCX
10. chapter 5
DOCX
9. chapter 4
DOCX
7. chapter 2
DOCX
5. abstract
DOCX
2. approval sheet
DOCX
1.manufacturing of particle board from oil palm frond
DOCX
question and answer about quality control
DOCX
Relationship between quality and productivity
DOCX
Furniture quality
Negative impacts of formaldehyde release from furniture made
Standard plank for wood lamination on khaya ivorensis
Cara cara untuk memohon melanjutkan pelajaran ke peringkat sarjana(master
My Passion
Mechanism of adhesion
Lab report adherend
Plywood
Q&A about quality control management
resume draft sheet
13. vita
11. references
10. chapter 5
9. chapter 4
7. chapter 2
5. abstract
2. approval sheet
1.manufacturing of particle board from oil palm frond
question and answer about quality control
Relationship between quality and productivity
Furniture quality

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
ACSFv1EN-58255 AWS Academy Cloud Security Foundations.pptx
PDF
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
PDF
The Rise and Fall of 3GPP – Time for a Sabbatical?
PDF
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
PPTX
sap open course for s4hana steps from ECC to s4
PPTX
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
PDF
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
DOCX
The AUB Centre for AI in Media Proposal.docx
PDF
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis method based random forest with bat algorithm
PDF
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
PDF
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
PPTX
MYSQL Presentation for SQL database connectivity
PDF
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
PDF
Per capita expenditure prediction using model stacking based on satellite ima...
PDF
Chapter 3 Spatial Domain Image Processing.pdf
PDF
MIND Revenue Release Quarter 2 2025 Press Release
PPTX
Understanding_Digital_Forensics_Presentation.pptx
PDF
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
PDF
KodekX | Application Modernization Development
PPTX
Effective Security Operations Center (SOC) A Modern, Strategic, and Threat-In...
ACSFv1EN-58255 AWS Academy Cloud Security Foundations.pptx
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
The Rise and Fall of 3GPP – Time for a Sabbatical?
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
sap open course for s4hana steps from ECC to s4
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
The AUB Centre for AI in Media Proposal.docx
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis method based random forest with bat algorithm
Approach and Philosophy of On baking technology
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
MYSQL Presentation for SQL database connectivity
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
Per capita expenditure prediction using model stacking based on satellite ima...
Chapter 3 Spatial Domain Image Processing.pdf
MIND Revenue Release Quarter 2 2025 Press Release
Understanding_Digital_Forensics_Presentation.pptx
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
KodekX | Application Modernization Development
Effective Security Operations Center (SOC) A Modern, Strategic, and Threat-In...

PARTICLEBOARD EXPERIMENT

  • 1. DIPLOMA IN WOOD INDUSTRY FINAL YEAR REPORT WTE 375 PARTICLEBOARD FROM OIL PALM FROND NORHALIMAHTUS SAADIAH BINTI RAZALI (2009445966) NOOR AIN BINTI MOHD HAZAN (20094842772) IZZAH AZIMAH BINTI NOH (2009482646)
  • 3. PARTICLEBOARD panel product made by compressing small particle of wood while simultaneously bonding them with an adhesive. first made in Germany in1940. nine types of board that are: 1. chips 2. flake 3. wafer 4. sawdust 5. excelsior 6. sliver 7. strand 8. shaving 9. fiber Particleboard can be choose to undergo either flat press or extruded press but the most popular is flat press.
  • 4. S PECIES : OIL PALM FROND SOURCE : UITM AGRICULTURE FARM REASON : TO REDUCE WASTE OF OIL PALM
  • 6. CHARACTERISTIC OF PARTICLEBOARD • cheaper • denser • More uniform that conventional wood and plywood • is substituted for them when appearance • strength are less important than cost •The strength of the board will depend on; - density - thickness - layered - graded structure - adhesive
  • 8. • Particle come out with different sizes by using screening machine • wood species is oil palm • particle sizes as a parameter: - 1.0 mm - 2.0 mm • resin that use in producing the particleboard is phenol formaldehyde. • using different concentration as a parameter: - 7% - 9% -11%
  • 10. •CHIPPER to chip large pieces of wood • FLAKER for cutting into desired sizes flakes from chips as well as sliced bamboo and crushed veneer •SCREENING screening the flake into differences size
  • 11. •OVEN for reducing the moisture content of flake •BALANCE balancing weight of PF and also balancing weight of particle
  • 12. •PARTICLEBOARD MIXER for mixing the particle with resin •COLD PRESS for reducing the thickness of particle board and consolidate the resin •HOT PRESS for heating and curing the resin
  • 13. •ARM SAW for trimming the edge of particle board •TABLE SAW To cut the particleboard for testing •INSTRON (TESTING MACHINE) For test the bending and internal bonding
  • 15. PARTICLE BOARD CALCULATION for 7% phenol formaldehyde
  • 16. 1. Calculate total materials required per board Target density = 600kg/m³ Thickness = 12mm Length x width = 35mm x 35mm Material required per board = Length x Width x Thickness x Density = 35cm x 35cm x 1.2cm³ x 0.6g/cm³ = 882g (at ± 10% equivalence Moisture Content) =801.8g (at oven died weight)
  • 17. 2. Calculated resin required Resin content = 7% Solid content of resin = 40.2% (as given as supplier) Amount of liquid resin required = [ RS/SC x Wt. per board ]+ 5% = (0.09/0.402 x 801.8) + 5% = 146.58g
  • 18. 3. Calculated equivalence resin content Equivalent resin content= Liquid resin x solid content = 139.6 x 0.402 = 56.12g
  • 19. 4. Calculate oven-dried weight of wood flakes Wood flakes (O/D wt.)= Material wt. – resin wt. = 801.8g – 56.12g = 745.68g
  • 20. 5. Calculation air-dried weight of wood required M.C of wood = 3% Wood (A/D wt.)= [ Wood (O/D) x (1 + MC/100) ] + 5% = 745.68 x 1.03 + 5% = 806.45g
  • 21. PARTICLE BOARD CALCULATION for 9% phenol formaldehyde
  • 22. Material required per board = Length x Width x Thickness x Density = 35cm x 35cm x 1.02cm³ x 0.6g/cm³ = 882g (at ± 10% equivalence Moisture Content) =801.8g (at oven died weight)
  • 23. 2. Calculated resin required Resin content = 9% Solid content of resin = 40.2% (as given as supplier) Amount of liquid resin required = [ RS/SC x Wt. per board ]+ 5% = (0.09/0.402 x 801.8) + 5% = 188.48g
  • 24. 3. Calculated equivalence resin content Equivalent resin content = Liquid resin x solid content = 179.51 x 0.402 = 72.16g
  • 25. 4. Calculate oven-dried weight of wood flakes Wood flakes (O/D wt.)= Material wt. – resin wt. = 801.8g – 72.16g = 729.64g
  • 26. 5. Calculation air-dried weight of wood required M.C of wood = 3% Wood (A/D wt.) = [ Wood (O/D) x (1 + MC/100) ] + 5% = 729.64 x 1.03 + 5% = 789.11g
  • 27. PARTICLE BOARD CALCULATION for 11% phenol formaldehyde
  • 28. 1. Calculate total materials required per board Target density = 600kg/m³ Thickness = 12mm Length x width = 35mm x 35mm Material required per board = Length x Width x Thickness x Density = 35cm x 35cm x 1.2cm³ x 0.6g/cm³ = 882g (at ± 10% equivalence Moisture Content) =801.8g (at oven died weight)
  • 29. 2. Calculated resin required Resin content = 11% Solid content of resin = 40.2% (as given as supplier) Amount of liquid resin required = [ RS/SC x Wt. per board ]+ 5% = (0.11/ 0.402 x 801.8) + 5% = 230.37g
  • 30. 3. Calculated equivalence resin content Equivalent resin content = Liquid resin x solid content = 219.40 x 0.402 = 88.20g
  • 31. 4. Calculate oven-dried weight of wood flakes Wood flakes (O/D wt.) = Material wt. – resin wt. = 801.8g – 88.20g = 713.6g
  • 32. 5. Calculation air-dried weight of wood required M.C of wood = 3% Wood (A/D wt.)= [ Wood (O/D) x (1 + MC/100) ] + 5% = 713.6 x 1.03 + 5% = 771.76g
  • 34. Frond cleaning Oil palm tree Oil palm frond process Flaking process Wood chip Chipping process
  • 35. Particle base on Wood flakes screening process sizes Weight the resin weighing process Oven dry
  • 36. Matt forming Mixing process Cold press process Trimming process particleboard Hot press
  • 37. Marking for testing Cutting for testing Measure the width Thickness swelling Weight the Measure the length testing particleboard
  • 38. Testing Bending testing Internal Bonding Thickness Swelling testing testing
  • 40. MALAYSIAN STANDARD TESTING BENDING : MS1787 :PART 10 :2005 IB : MS1787 :PART 11 :2005 TS : MS1787 :PART 6 :2005 MOE MOR IB TS >2000 >14 >0.45 <12
  • 41. PARTICLEBOARD CUTTING SECTION FOR TESTING •MOE measure the resistance to bending related to stiffness of a beam MOE/MOR 1 •MOR MOE / MOR 2 The index of the ultimate breaking IB1 TS1 IB2 TS2 IB3 TS3 IB4 strength when loaded as a simple beam MOE / MOR 3 TS4 IB5 TS5 IB6 TS6 IB7 TS7 •IB for measure the mechanical properties of the particle board. MOE / MOR 4 •TS measurement of the physical properties of particleboard
  • 42. BENDING TESTING This testing is for measure the mechanical properties of the particle board. Usually, this testing is for measure the Modulus of Rupture (MOR) and Modulus of Elasticity (MOE) From this testing we can know the mode of failure from testing as well as for structural application requiring strength and rigidity For this particleboard, the testing for the sample is important to determine the characteristics for overall samples.
  • 43. INTERNAL BONDING An overall measure of the board’s integrity that defines how well the core material is bonded together.  In the standard test for IB, dimension of 50mm x 50mm piece of particleboard is pulled apart with tension applied perpendicularly to both faces. IB is influence directly by board density, resin content, particle geometry and raw material type.
  • 44. THICKNESS SWELLING These types of testing usually for measurement of the physical properties of particleboard. The Thickness Swelling and Water Absorption test we soaked the sample to the water. Before we soaked the sample to the water we must take the weight for Water Absorption testing and the length and diameter for Thickness Swelling testing.
  • 46. GRAPH OF 1.0 MM SIZE PARTICLE
  • 47. GRAPH MOR 1.0 mm MOR Mean Standard 17.44 14 12.21 10.02 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont.
  • 48. GRAPH MOE 1.0 mm MOE Mean Standard 2306.43 2000 1721.91 1460.98 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont.
  • 49. GRAPH IB 1.0mm IB Mean Standard 1.97 1.28 1.12 0.45 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont.
  • 50. GRAPH TS 1.0mm Percentage of Thickness Swelling Percent (%) Standard 24.53 22.12 16.03 12 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont.
  • 51. GRAPH WA 1.0mm Percentage of Water Absorbtion Percent (%) 133.44 118.92 102.51 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont.
  • 52. GRAPH OF 2.0MM SIZE PARTICLE
  • 53. GRAPH MOR 2.0mm MOR Mean Standard 18.38 14 12.6 10.91 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont.
  • 54. GRAPH MOE 2.0mm MOE Mean Standard 2507.96 2000 1666.99 1771.35 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont.
  • 55. GRAPH IB 2.0mm IB Mean Standard 1.35 0.70 0.69 0.45 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont.
  • 56. GRAPH WA 2.0mm Percentage of Water Absorbtion Percent (%) 119.76 116.95 112.87 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont.
  • 57. DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN 2.0 MM AND 1.0MM
  • 58. Differentiation MOR between Particle 1.0mm and 2.0mm 18.38 17.44 12.21 14 10.91 12.6 10.02 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont. 1.0mm 2.0mm Standard
  • 59. Differentiation MOE between Particle 1.0mm and 2.0mm 2507.96 1771.35 2306.43 1666.99 2000 1721.91 1460.98 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont. 1.0mm 2.0mm Standard
  • 60. Differentiation IB between Particle 1.0mm and 2.0mm 1.97 1.28 1.12 1.35 0.69 0.70 0.45 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont. 1.0mm 2.0mm Standard
  • 61. Differantiation Percentage Thickness Swelling between Particle 1.0mm and 2.0mm 31.73 23.46 19.18 24.53 22.12 16.03 12 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont. 1.0mm 2.0mm Standard
  • 62. Differentiation Percentage Water Absorption Particle 1.0mm and 2.0mm 1.0mm 2.0mm 119.76 118.92 112.87 133.44 116.95 102.51 7% resin cont. 9% resin cont. 11% resin cont.
  • 64. SAMPLES MOE MOR IB TS WA A 1.0mm 1460.98 10.02 1.12 24.53 133.44 7%pf B 1.0mm 1721.91 12.21 1.28 22.12 118.92 9%pf C 1.0mm 2306.43 17.44 1.97 16.03 102.51 11% D 2.0mm 1666.99 10.01 0.69 31.73 119.76 7%pf E 2.0mm 1771.35 12.60 0.70 23.46 116.95 9%pf F 2.0mm 2507.96 18.38 1.35 19.18 11.87 11%pf STANDARD >2000 >14 >0.45 <12 -
  • 68. MOE Sources p-value Size 0.139 Resin 0.000
  • 69. MOR Sources p-value Size 0.483 Resin 0.000
  • 70. IB Sources p-value Size 0.000 Resin 0.000
  • 71. TS Sources p-value Size 0.000 Resin 0.000
  • 73. • The bigger size of particle the better of MOE and MOR. • The smaller size of particle the better IB and Thickness Swelling.