SEM 4 : BUILDING STRUCTURE MODULE OUTLINE

0
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (HONOURS) IN ARCHITECTURE
BUILDING | STRUCTURE
(ARC2523/BLD60103)
MODULE OUTLINE
August 2016
Image: Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Building
(https://www.engr.psu.edu/ae/thesis/portfolios/2011/jpp5060/images/structure.jpg)
Programme Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Architecture
Module BUILDING │STRUCTURE (ARC60603/ARC2323/ARC2312)
Prerequisite Building Construction 2 (ARC 2213)
Credit Hours 3
Classification Core

Building |Structure (BLD60103/ARC2523): August 2016 1
Instructor Ann See Peng (603-56295250; seepeng.ann@taylors.edu.my)
Mohd. Adib Ramli (603-56295095; MohdAdib.Ramli@taylors.edu.my)
Norita Johar (mysquad3@yahoo.com)
Module Synopsis
The module covers principles of selecting appropriate structural systems and designing elements and
structures, an introduction to structural analysis, deflections, structural design as well as the
application of structural design codes including loading codes.
Module Teaching Objectives
The teaching objective of the module is:
1. To introduce an understanding of the structural system as part of construction technology and to
be able to visualize structural loading’s action and reaction, followed by quantification through
simple mathematical analysis.
Module Learning Outcomes (MLO)
The objectives of the module are translated into a number of Module Learning Outcomes (MLO),
mapped to Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO) and Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities (TGC).
No. MLO PLO TGC
1 Identify structural systems and forces. 4
2.1
3.1
7.1
2
Identify the basic principles of soil mechanics relevant to architectural design
and practice.
4
3.2
7.1
3 Apply structural theory in designing structural elements. 4
2.2
3.2
7.1
4 Analyse loading conditions using simple mathematical calculation 4
5
Illustrate the manipulation of loading forces graphically.
4
6
Appraise the technical standards as well as structural design codes and
loading codes to be applied to building design
5
Modes of Delivery and TIMeS
This is a 3 credit hour module conducted over a period of 12 weeks. The modes of delivery will be in
the form of lectures, discussion/tutorials, and self-directed study. The breakdown of the contact hours
is as follows:
 Lecture: 2 hours per week
 Discussion/Tutorial: 2 hours per week
 Self-directed study: 5 hours per week
TIMeS will be used as a communication tool and information portal for students to access module
materials, project briefs, assignments and announcements.

Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO)*
The Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Architecture programme has as its objectives that graduates
exemplify the following Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO) that will enable them to:
No. Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO)
1
Produce designs at appropriate complexity and scales up to the schematic level using appropriate
communication tools
2
Demonstrate understanding of cultural, historical and established architectural theories, philosophies and
context
3
Demonstrate creativity, innovation and imagination and translate these into an architectural design
solution
4
Develop design to a level for regulatory application for Building Plan submission that complies to the
requirements of local authorities, including understanding of building regulations, basic building
construction and materials, environmental considerations and building services
5
Translate design into construction drawings with appropriate construction details and use established
architectural drawing convention
6 Work in a team and participate in the design process
*Source: The Manual of Accreditation for Architecture Programmes, Board of Architects Malaysia, 2013
Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities (TGC)
The teaching and learning approach at Taylor’s University is focused on developing the Taylor’s
Graduate Capabilities (TGC) in its students; capabilities that encompass the knowledge, cognitive
capabilities and soft skills of its graduates.
Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities (TGC)
1. Discipline Specific Knowledge
1.1Able to put theories into practice
1.2Understand ethicalissues in the context of the field of study
1.3 Understand professional practice within the field of study
2. Lifelong Learning
2.1 Learn independently
2.2 Locate, extract, synthesize and utilize information effectively
2.3 Be intellectual engaged
3. Thinking and Problem Solving skills
3.1 Think critically and creatively
3.2 Define and analyze problems to arrive at effective solutions
4. Communication Skills
4.1 Communicate appropriately in various settings and modes
5. Interpersonal Skills
5.1 Understand team dynamics and mobilize the power of teams
5.2 Understand and assume leadership
6. Intrapersonal Skills
6.1 Manage oneself and be self–reliant
6.2 Reflection one’s action and learning
6.3 Embody Taylor’s core values
7. Citizenship and Global Perspectives
7.1 Be aware of and form opinions from diverse perspectives
7.2 Understand the value of civic responsibility and community engagement
8. Digital Literacy
8.1 Effective use of ICT and related technology

Types of Assessments and Feedback
You will be graded in the form of formative and summative assessments. Formative assessment
involves participation in discussions and feedback sessions. Summative assessment will inform you
about the level of understanding and performance capabilities achieved at the end of the module.
No. Assessment Components Type MLO Weightage
1 Project 1: Roof Truss (week 7) Formative 1, 3, 4 30%
2 Project 2: Case Study (week 13) Formative 2, 3, 5 40%
3 Final Exam Summative All 30%
4 Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities Portfolio Summative All Pass/Fail
Total 100%
Assessment Components
1. Project 1 – Roof Truss
In the form of group, students are required to redesign the roof system of their studio 3 design.
2. Project 2 - Case Study
In the form of group, students are required to produce structural drawings of a reinforced concrete
bungalow. Then each group member is to propose their own structural calculation of beams and
columns of the building.
3. Final Exam
The final examination is designed to assess the ability of the students in solving building structures
issues from the theoretical and practical aspect.
4. Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities Portfolio (TGCP)
The Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities Portfolio is a document that collates all assessments produced
in a module and reflects a student’s acquisition of the Module Learning Outcomes and Taylor’s
Graduate Capabilities. Each student is to develop an ePortfolio, a web-based portfolio in the form
of a personal academic blog. The ePortfolio is developed progressively for all modules taken
throughout Semesters 1 to 5, and culminates with a final Portfolio in printed form produced in the
final semester. The printed Portfolio must encapsulate the acquisition of Programme Learning
Outcomes and Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities, and showcase the distinctiveness and identity of
the student as a graduate of the programme.

Marks and Grading Table
Assessments and grades will be returned within two weeks of your submission. You will be given
grades and necessary feedback for each submission. The grading system is shown below:
Grade Marks
Grade
Points
Definition Description
A 80 – 100 4.00 Excellent
Evidence of original thinking; demonstrated outstanding
capacity to analyze and synthesize; outstanding grasp of
module matter; evidence of extensive knowledge base.
A- 75 – 79 3.67 Very Good
Evidence of good grasp of module matter; critical capacity
and analytical ability; understanding of relevant issues;
evidence of familiarity with the literature.
B+ 70 – 74 3.33
Good
Evidence of grasp of module matter; critical capacity and
analytical ability, reasonable understanding of relevant
issues; evidence of familiarity with the literature.B 65 – 69 3.00
B- 60 – 64 2.67
Pass
Evidence of some understanding of the module matter;
ability to develop solutions to simple problems; benefitting
from his/her university experience.
C+ 55 – 59 2.33
C 50 – 54 2.00
D+ 47 – 49 1.67
Marginal Fail
Evidence of nearly but not quite acceptable familiarity with
module matter, weak in critical and analytical skills.
D 44 – 46 1.33
D- 40 – 43 1.00
F 0 – 39 0.00 Fail
Insufficient evidence of understanding of the module
matter; weakness in critical and analytical skills; limited or
irrelevant use of the literature.
WD - - Withdrawn
Withdrawn from a module before census date, typically
mid-semester [refer to Description 1 below].
F(W) 0 0.00 Fail
Withdrawn after census date, typically mid-semester
[refer to Description 2 below].
IN - - Incomplete
An interim notation given for a module where a student
has not completed certain requirements with valid reason
or it is not possible to finalise the grade by the published
deadline.
P - - Pass Given for satisfactory completion of practicum.
AU - - Audit
Given for a module where attendance is for information
only without earning academic credit.
Description 1: Week 3 to week 7 (inclusive) for long semester, or week 3 to week 5 (inclusive) for short semester.
A short semester is less than 14 weeks. Not applicable for audit and internship.
Description 2: After week 7 for long semester, or after week 5 for short semester. A short semester is less than
14 weeks. Not applicable for audit and internship.
Coursework Assessments and Final Examination
A student who fails to attempt all assessment components worth 20% or more, including final exam
and final presentation, will result in failing the module irrespective of the marks earned, even though
he/she has achieved 50% or more in the overall assessment. Student will not be allowed to resit the
examination (or resubmit an assessment).

Module Schedule (subject to change at short notice)
Date/Week
Lecture/Presentation Discussion/Tutorial Self-directed Study
Hours Hours Hours
29 August
Introduction
Introduction to the module
- -
Week 1 2 2 5
5 September
Introduction To Structural Design
 Types of Load
 Types of Structure
 Element of Structural Behaviour
 Basic Modes of Structural Action
- -
Week 2 2 2 5
12 September Public Holiday Project 1 discussion -
Week 3 2 2 5
19 September
Forces and Equilibrium
 Definition of forces
 Types of force
 Resolution of force
 Body in equilibrium
Project 1 discussion
Exercise
(Force Analysis)
Week 4 2 2 5
26 September
Structural Frames/Truss
 Types of Frame
 Analysis of frame
Exercise
(Truss Analysis)
Week 5 2 2 5
3 October Public Holiday - Revision
Week 6 2 2 5
10 October Project 1 Submission - Revision
Week 7 2 2 5
17 October
Type of slab
 One way (include staircase)
 Two way slab
Project 2 briefing Revision
Week 8
24 October
Beams
 Types of beams
 Reaction
 Internal Forces
Project 2 discussion Building Design
Week 9 2 2 5
Semester Break 31 October to 4 November
7 November
Analysis of beams
 Shear Force Diagram
 Bending-moment Diagram
 Deflection
Structural Framing
of the Building
Week 10 2 2 5

14 November
Column/Wall
 Types of Column
 Area method to calculate force in
Column
Structural Framing
of the Building
Week 11 2 2 5
21 November Project 2 submission Project 2 discussion
Structural analysis
of the Building
Week 12 2 2 5
28 November
Submission: TGC Portfolio
Compilation of
report
Week 13 2 2 5
5 December - - -
Week 14 2 2 5
Main References:
1. BS 8110: Part 1: 1985. British Standard: Structural Use Of Concrete. Part 1. Code Of Practice For
Design And Construction. British Standards Institution (BSI)
2. C. K. Wang.1993. Intermediate Structural Analysis. New York: Mcgraw Hill Book Company.
3. D.F Mccarthy. 2002. Essentials Of Soil Mechanics & Foundations: Basic Geotechnics, 6th Edition.
New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
4. R. C. Coates, M. G. Coutie, F. K. Kong. 1997. Structural Analysis: Third Edition. London:
Chapman & Hall
5. R. Whitlow. 2001. Basic Soil Mechanics 4th Edition. UK: Prentice Hall.
6. B. Onouye. 2005. Statics and Strength of Materials: First Edition. Upper Saddle River, New
Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Recommended References:
1. C. Liu, J.B Evett. 2000. Soil Properties: Testing, Measurement & Evaluation 4th Edition.
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
2. Chajes, A. 1990. Principles Of Structural Stability Theory: Second Edition. Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3. H. H. West .1993. Fundamentals Of Structural Analysis. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
4. L. C. Tartaglione. 1991. Structural Analysis. New York: Mcgraw Hill Book Co.
5. W.T. Marshall, H. M. Nelson. 1990. Structures, 3rd Edition. (Revised By Bhatt, P. & Nelson, H.
M.). London: Longman.
6. Yuan-Yu Hsieh, S. T. Mau. 1995. Elementary Theory Of Structures 4th Edition. Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS
Student-centered Learning
The module uses the Student-centered Learning (SCL)approach. Utilization of SCL embodies most of
the principles known to improve learning and to encourage student’s participation. SCL requires
students to be active, responsible participants in their own learning and instructors are to facilitate the
learning process. Various teaching and learning strategies such as experiential learning, problem-
based learning, site visits, group discussions, presentations, working in group and etc. can be
employed to facilitate the learning process. In SCL, students are expected to be:
 active in their own learning;
 self-directed to be responsible to enhance their learning abilities;
 able to cultivate skills that are useful in today’s workplace;
 active knowledge seekers;
 active players in a team.
Attendance and Student Participation
Attendance is compulsory. Any student who arrives late after the first half-hour of class will be
considered as absent. The lectures and tutorials will assist you in expanding your ideas and your
assessments. A minimum of 80% attendance is required to pass the module and/or be eligible for the
final examination and/or presentation.
Students will be assessed based on their performance throughout the semester. Students are
expected to attend and participate actively in class. Class participation is an important component of
every module.Your participation in the module is encouraged. You have the opportunity to participate
in the following ways:
 Your ideas and questions are welcomed, valued and encouraged.
 Your input is sought to understand your perspectives, ideas and needs in planning module
revision.
 You have opportunities to give feedback and issues will be addressed in response to that
feedback.
 Do reflect on your performance in Portfolios.
 Student evaluation on your views and experiences about the module are actively sought and used
as an integral part of improvement in teaching and continuous improvement.
Late Submission Penalty
The School imposes a late submission penalty for work submitted late without a valid reason e.g. a
medical certificate. Any work submitted after the deadline (which may have been extended) shall have
the percentage grade assigned to the work on face value reduced by 10% for the first day and 5% for
each subsequent day late. A weekend counts as one (1) day.
Individual members of staff shall be permitted to grant extensions for assessed work that they have
set if they are satisfied that a student has given good reasons.
Absenteeism at intermediate or final presentation will result in zero mark for that presentation.
The Board of Examiners may overrule any penalty imposed and allow the actual mark achieved to be
used if the late submission was for a good reason.

Plagiarism
Plagiarism, which is an attempt to present another person’s work as your own by not acknowledging
the source, is a serious case of misconduct which is deemed unacceptable by the University.
"Work" includes written materials such as books, journals and magazine articles or other papers and
also includes films and computer programs. The two most common types of plagiarism are from
published materials and other students’ works.
1. Published Materials
In general, whenever anything from someone else’s work is used, whether it is an idea, an opinion
or the results of a study or review, a standard system of referencing should be used. Examples of
plagiarism may include a sentence or two, or a table or a diagram from a book or an article used
without acknowledgement.
Serious cases of plagiarism can be seen in cases where the entire paper presented by the student
is copied from another book, with an addition of only a sentence or two by the student.
While the former can be treated as a simple failure to cite references, the latter is likely to be
viewed as cheating in an examination.
Though most assignments require the need for reference to other peoples’ works, in order to avoid
plagiarism, students should keep a detailed record of the sources of ideas and findings and ensure
that these sources are clearly quoted in their assignment. Note that plagiarism also refers to
materials obtained from the Internet too.
2. Other Students’ Works
Circulating relevant articles and discussing ideas before writing an assignment is a common
practice. However, with the exception of group assignments, students should write their own
papers. Plagiarising the work of other students into assignments includes using identical or very
similar sentences, paragraphs or sections. When two students submit papers that are very similar
in tone and content, both are likely to be penalised.
Guide for Writing References:
- http://taylorslibrary.taylors.edu.my/user_skills/user_support_students

SEM 4 : BUILDING STRUCTURE MODULE OUTLINE

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to SEM 4 : BUILDING STRUCTURE MODULE OUTLINE (20)

More from Darshiini Vig (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

SEM 4 : BUILDING STRUCTURE MODULE OUTLINE