SEM 6 : PORTFOLIO MODULE OUTLINE

Architectural Portfolio (GRA60203 / ARC3732 / ARC3733) 1 | P a g e
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (HONOURS) IN ARCHITECTURE
ARCHITECTURAL PORTFOLIO
(GRA60203/ARC3732/ARC3733)
MODULE OUTLINE
August 2017
Image: Transposition, lorenzo mattozzi architecture portfolio© (2010)

Programme Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Architecture
Module ARCHITECTURAL PORTFOLIO (GRA60203/ARC3732/ARC3733)
Prerequisite Architectural Design Studio 5 (ARC60306/ARC3117)
Credit Hours 3
Classification Core Elective
Instructors Ahmad Nazmi Anuar (AhmadNazmi.MohamedAnuar@taylors.edu.my)
Nicholas Ng (nicholasngkw@gmail.com; NicholasKhoonWu.Ng@taylors.edu.my)
Ar. Teoh Way Keat (Teohwaykeat@gmail.com)
Module Synopsis
The portfolio is the single most important document, record, and indication of the standard,
competency, and interests of the individual designer/architect/student. It is locally, nationally, and
internationally used for entry into design/architecture programs, postgraduate study, and for entry
into the profession and private practice.
The module will assist students in preparing and presenting their portfolios both verbally and visually.
The module will be presented in the form of a studio with lectures, workshops, tutorials, student
presentations, critiques, and class discussions.
The portfolio is a reconciliation of all streams within the program, (architecture design studios,
technology and building environment studies, cultural, artistic and social studies, communication and
professional studies) and is intended as a holistic mean of assessment of a student’s achievements; it
should be in no means construed as a remedial class, a purely graphics or packaging exercise, or a
reassessment of past design studios.
The student will demonstrate through the verbal and visual presentation of the portfolio that he/she
can consciously determine a direction for his/her work, and assume responsibility for his/her
continuing education.
SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING AND DESIGN
Centre for Modern Architecture Studies in Southeast Asia

Module Teaching Objectives
The teaching objectives of the module are:
1. To introduce and discuss various approaches for the presentation of works in the format of a
portfolio.
2. To introduce proficiencies and skills required in the production and design of a personal
portfolio.
3. To aid the development of and enhance a student’s individual design statement and
conceptualization skills.
4. To develop the student’s ability to understand and exercise discernment in the selection
process of materials to be included in their portfolio
Module Learning Outcomes (MLO)
The objectives of the module are translated into a number of Module Learning Outcomes (MLO),
mapped to Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO) and Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities (TGC).
No. MLO PLO TGC
1 Develop and distinguish a personal design statement and direction 2
2.3
3.1
7.1
2
Strategize and organize the necessary resources (effective time
management, application of software, etc.) for the production of a
personal portfolio
1
2.2
3.2
4.1
3
Produce a compiled document of works that succinctly highlights
the student’s personal design statement, acquired skills and
intellectual capacities
5
1.3
4.1
Modes of Delivery and TIMeS
This is a 3 credit hour module conducted over a period of 12 weeks. The modes of delivery will be in
the form of lectures, discussion/tutorials, and self-directed study. The breakdown of the contact hours
is as follows:
 Lecture: 1 hour per week
 Discussion/Tutorial: 4 hours per week
 Self-directed study: 4.5 hours per week
TIMeS will be used as a communication tool and information portal for students to access module
materials, project briefs, assignments and announcements.

Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO)*
The Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Architecture programme has as its objectives that graduates
exemplify the following Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO) that will enable them to:
No. Programme Learning Outcomes (PLO)
1
Produce designs at appropriate complexity and scales up to the schematic level using
appropriate communication tools
2
Demonstrate understanding of cultural, historical and established architectural theories,
philosophies and context
3
Demonstrate creativity, innovation and imagination and translate these into an architectural
design solution
4
Develop design to a level for regulatory application for Building Plan submission that
complies to the requirements of local authorities, including understanding of building
regulations, basic building construction and materials, environmental considerations and
building services
5
Translate design into construction drawings with appropriate construction details and use
established architectural drawing convention
6 Work in a team and participate in the design process
*Source: The Manual of Accreditation for Architecture Programmes, Board of Architects Malaysia, 2013

Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities (TGC)
The teaching and learning approach at Taylor’s University is focused on developing the Taylor’s
Graduate Capabilities (TGC) in its students; capabilities that encompass the knowledge, cognitive
capabilities and soft skills of its graduates.
Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities (TGC)
1. Discipline Specific Knowledge
1.1 Able to put theories into practice
1.2 Understand ethical issues in the context of the field of study
1.3 Understand professional practice within the field of study
2. Lifelong Learning
2.1 Learn independently
2.2 Locate, extract, synthesize and utilize information effectively
2.3 Be intellectual engaged
3. Thinking and Problem Solving skills
3.1 Think critically and creatively
3.2 Define and analyze problems to arrive at effective solutions
4. Communication Skills
4.1 Communicate appropriately in various settings and modes
5. Interpersonal Skills
5.1 Understand team dynamics and mobilize the power of teams
5.2 Understand and assume leadership
6. Intrapersonal Skills
6.1 Manage oneself and be self–reliant
6.2 Reflection one’s action and learning
6.3 Embody Taylor’s core values
7. Citizenship and Global Perspectives
7.1 Be aware of and form opinions from diverse perspectives
7.2 Understand the value of civic responsibility and community engagement
8. Digital Literacy
8.1 Effective use of ICT and related technology

Types of Assessment and Feedback
You will be graded in the form of formative and summative assessments. Formative assessment
involves participation in discussions and feedback sessions. Summative assessment will inform you
about the level of understanding and performance capabilities achieved at the end of the module.
Assessment Plan
No. Assessment Components Type MLO
Weightag
e
1
Assignment 1A: Portfolio Draft: -Curation,
Creating Convention, Packaging
Formative 2
50%
Assignment 1B: Personal Design Statement Formative 1
Portfolio Draft Submission Summative 2, 3
2
Portfolio Final Submission Summative
1 - 3 50%
Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities Portfolio Summative
Total 100%
Assessment Components
1. Assignment 1 consists of 2 (Two) parts: – 50%
A. : Portfolio Draft: Curation, Creating Convention & Packaging (30%)
B. : Personal Design Statement (20%)
Assignment 1A (Portfolio Draft: Curation, Creating Convention & Packaging): -
Curating and Idea Mapping: As a ‘Curator’ of your own work, you are required to reconcile your
work of all streams within the program (architecture design studios, technology and building
environment studies, cultural, artistic and social studies, communication and professional studies)
and select the best FOUR projects to represent your personal direction and design approach.
Creating Convention: You are required to create a suitable format, size and graphic convention
which will display your work effectively and translate your Personal Design Statement clearly.
Assignment 1B (Personal Design Statement): -
A Personal Design Statement is ONE A4 page that should be well written and intended to
summarize the overall experiences of learning in the course and abilities to determine your
personal values and direction in architecture. The word count for the paper is 400 words (max).

2. Final Project Submission (Complete Portfolio): – 50%
Students are required to showcase your final portfolio visually.
3. Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities Portfolio (TGCP)
The Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities Portfolio is a document that collates all assessments produced
in a module and reflects a student’s acquisition of the Module Learning Outcomes and Taylor’s
Graduate Capabilities. Each student is to develop an ePortfolio, a web-based portfolio in the form
of a personal academic blog. The ePortfolio is developed progressively for all modules taken
throughout Semesters 1 to 3, and culminates with a final Portfolio in printed form produced in the
final semester. The printed Portfolio must encapsulate the acquisition of Programme Learning
Outcomes and Taylor’s Graduate Capabilities, and showcase the distinctiveness and identity of the
student as a graduate of the programme.

Marks and Grading Table
Assessments and grades will be returned within two weeks of your submission. You will be given
grades and necessary feedback for each submission. The grading system is shown below:
Grade Marks
Grade
Points
Definition Description
A 80 –100 4.00 Excellent
Evidence of original thinking; demonstrated
outstanding capacity to analyze and synthesize;
outstanding grasp of module matter; evidence of
extensive knowledge base.
A- 75 – 79 3.67 Very Good
Evidence of good grasp of module matter; critical
capacity and analytical ability; understanding of
relevant issues; evidence of familiarity with the
literature.
B+ 70 – 74 3.33
Good
Evidence of grasp of module matter; critical
capacity and analytical ability, reasonable
understanding of relevant issues; evidence of
familiarity with the literature.
B 65 – 69 3.00
B- 60 – 64 2.67
Pass
Evidence of some understanding of the module
matter; ability to develop solutions to simple
problems; benefitting from his/her university
experience.
C+ 55 – 59 2.33
C 50 – 54 2.00
D+ 47 – 49 1.67
Marginal
Fail
Evidence of nearly but not quite acceptable
familiarity with module matter, weak in critical and
analytical skills.
D 44 – 46 1.33
D- 40 – 43 1.00
F 0 – 39 0.00 Fail
Insufficient evidence of understanding of the
module matter; weakness in critical and analytical
skills; limited or irrelevant use of the literature.
WD - - Withdrawn
Withdrawn from a module before census date,
typically mid-semester. [refer to Description 1
below].
F(W) 0 0.00 Fail
Withdrawn after census date, typically mid-
semester.
[refer to Description 2 below].

IN - - Incomplete
An interim notation given for a module where a
student has not completed certain requirements
with valid reason or it is not possible to finalise
the grade by the published deadline.
P - - Pass Given for satisfactory completion of practicum.
AU - - Audit
Given for a module where attendance is for
information only without earning academic credit.
Description 1: Week 3 to week 7 (inclusive) for long semester, or week 3 to week 5 (inclusive) for
short semester. A short semester Is less than 14 weeks. Not applicable for audit and internship.
Description 2: After week 7 for long semester, or after week 5 for short semester. A short semester is
less than 14 weeks. Not applicable for audit and internship.
Module Schedule (subject to change at short notice)
Date/Week
Lecture/Presentation Discussion/Tutorial
Self-directed
Study
Hours Hours Hours
Tuesday,
29th
August
Intro to Module Outline and
Briefing of Assignments
Intro to Assignment 1: Curation of
Projects and Personal Design
Statement
In-class Discussion:
Curation of
projects
Curating works
Week 1 1-1/2 2-4 4.5
Tuesday,
5th
September
(Week 02 Friday:
Last day to
add/drop a
module)
The Art of Branding & BIG
Picture/Idea
Mapping of idea and direction
What is the right
format to present
my folio & idea
mapping?
Curating works,
setting up
framework for
portfolio
Week 2 1-1/2 2-4 4.5
Tuesday,
12th
September
Introduction to Graphics
Convention and Packaging
Design principles and theory of
graphics convention
Presentation
Setting up
framework and
format for
portfolio
Week 3 1-1/2 2-4 4.5

Date/Week
Self-directed
Study
Hours Hours Hours
Tuesday,
19th
September
Architecture Trajectory and Self
Identity
Personal design statement
What is your
‘Personal Design
Statement’
Reading and
writing
Week 4 2-4 4.5
Tuesday
26th
September
Submission: Assignment 1A & 1B
Tutorial
Presentation and
Critique
Final Portfolio
Week 5 1-1/2 2-4 4.5
Tuesday,
3rd
October
Professional Graphics &
Packaging Workshop
Adobe InDesign / Illustrator /
Photoshop
Adobe In-design /
Illustrator
workshop
Final Portfolio
Week 6 2 2 4.5
Tuesday,
10th
October
(Week 07 Friday:
Last day for
subject/module
withdrawal with
WD grade)
Packaging Workshop
Photoshop
ACTIVITY WEEK
Questions for
Week 8
Week 7 2 2 4.5
16th
to 20th
October
Non-Contact
Week
Mid-Semester Break
Tuesday,
24th
October
Who are we looking in the
workforce?
Reviewer / Professional Architect
Talk
Question and
Answer with
reviewer
Final Portfolio
Week 8 1-1/2 2-4 4.5
Tuesday,
31st
October
Packaging Workshop
Photoshop
Adobe In-design /
Illustrator
workshop
Final Portfolio
Week 9 1-1/2 2-4 4.5

Date/Week
Self-directed
Study
Hours Hours Hours
Tuesday,
7th
November Tutorial / Workshops
Final layout and
format
Final Portfolio
Week 10 1-1/2 2-4 4.5
Tuesday,
14th
November
(Week 11 Friday:
Online Course
Evaluation and
Last day for
subject/module
withdrawal with F
(W) grade)
Tutorial / Workshops
Final layout and
format
Final Portfolio
Week 11 1-1/2 2-4 4.5
Tuesday
21st
November
(Week 12 Friday:
Last day for
Online Course
Evaluation)
Final Submission
Studio 6 Final
Layout
TGC Portfolio
Week 12 1-1/2 2-4 4.5
Week 13 - - -
Week 14 - - -
*Studio 6 Submission and
Presentation
Week 15 - - -
Tuesday,
19th
December
Final Submission (Studio 6
included) and TGC Portfolio
- TGC Portfolio
Week 16 - - 7
Note: The Module Schedule above is subject to change at short notice.
Week 02 Friday: Last day to add/drop a module
Week 07 Friday: Last day for subject/module withdrawal with WD grade
Week 11 Friday: Online Course Evaluation and Last day for subject/module
withdrawal with F (W) grade
Week 12 Friday: Last day for Online Course Evaluation

References
Main References:
1. Caldwell, Cath, 2010. Winning Portfolios for Graphic Designers. Barron's Educational Series, Incorporated.
2. Cynthia L, Boran, 2009. Designing a Digital Portfolio (2nd Edition). New Riders, United States.
3. Damdi, 2010. Portfolio Vol 1-5. Damdi Publishing Co, Seoul, Korea.
4. Keller, Maura, 2010. Design Matters - Portfolios 01. Rockport, United States.
5. Luescher, Andreas, 2010. The Architect’s Portfolio. Routledge, New York.
6. Taylor, Fig, 2010. How to create a portfolio and get hired. Laurence King, London.
Secondary References:
Packaging
1. Anb, 2010. Card Board Book. anb, Singapore.
2. Sandu, 2009. New Packing. Sandu, Singapore.
Graphics
3. Ambrose, Gavin, 2011. Approach & Language. AVA, Switzerland.
4. Angus Hyland & Steven Bateman. 2011. Symbol. Laurence King, London.
5. Index Book, SL. 2010. Basic Identity. Index Book, SL. Spain.
6. Index Book, SL. 2011. Basic Brochures. Index Book, SL. Spain.
7. PIE Books, 2009. Informational Diagram Collection. PIE Books, Tokyo.
8. Vivian Lei, Artpower, 2011. Blank: A Book on Printing. Artpowe, Hong Kong.
GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS
Student-centered Learning
The module uses the Student-centered Learning (SCL) approach. Utilization of SCL embodies most of
the principles known to improve learning and to encourage student’s participation. SCL requires
students to be active, responsible participants in their own learning and instructors are to facilitate
the learning process. Various teaching and learning strategies such as experiential learning, problem-
based learning, site visits, group discussions, presentations, working in group and etc. can be
employed to facilitate the learning process. In SCL, students are expected to be:
 active in their own learning;
 self-directed to be responsible to enhance their learning abilities;
 able to cultivate skills that are useful in today’s workplace;
 active knowledge seekers;
 active players in a team.
Attendance and Student Participation
Attendance is compulsory. Any student who arrives late after the first half-hour of class will be
considered as absent. The lectures and tutorials will assist you in expanding your ideas and your
assessments. A minimum of 80% attendance is required to pass the module and/or be eligible for the
final examination and/or presentation.

Students will be assessed based on their performance throughout the semester. Students are
expected to attend and participate actively in class. Class participation is an important component of
every module. Your participation in the module is encouraged. You have the opportunity to
participate in the following ways:
 Your ideas and questions are welcomed, valued and encouraged.
 Your input is sought to understand your perspectives, ideas and needs in planning module
revision.
 You have opportunities to give feedback and issues will be addressed in response to that
feedback.
 Do reflect on your performance in Portfolios.
 Student evaluation on your views and experiences about the module are actively sought and used
as an integral part of improvement in teaching and continuous improvement.
Late Submission Penalty
The School imposes a late submission penalty for work submitted late without a valid reason e.g. a
medical certificate. Any work submitted after the deadline (which may have been extended) shall have
the percentage grade assigned to the work on face value reduced by 10% for the first day and 5%
for each subsequent day late. A weekend counts as one (1) day.
Individual members of staff shall be permitted to grant extensions for assessed work that they have
set if they are satisfied that a student has given good reasons.
Absenteeism at intermediate or final presentation will result in zero mark for that presentation.
The Board of Examiners may overrule any penalty imposed and allow the actual mark achieved to be
used if the late submission was for a good reason.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism, which is an attempt to present another person’s work as your own by not acknowledging
the source, is a serious case of misconduct which is deemed unacceptable by the University.
"Work" includes written materials such as books, journals and magazine articles or other papers and
also includes films and computer programs. The two most common types of plagiarism are from
published materials and other students’ works.
1. Published Materials
In general, whenever anything from someone else’s work is used, whether it is an idea, an opinion
or the results of a study or review, a standard system of referencing should be used. Examples of

SEM 6 : PORTFOLIO MODULE OUTLINE

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Similar to SEM 6 : PORTFOLIO MODULE OUTLINE (20)

More from Darshiini Vig (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

SEM 6 : PORTFOLIO MODULE OUTLINE